March 7, 2016 - AdH - Campus management + Lessons from · PDF file3/3/2011 ·...
Transcript of March 7, 2016 - AdH - Campus management + Lessons from · PDF file3/3/2011 ·...
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 1)
Campus Management + BK City as a test case
for international campus trends
Dr. ir. Alexandra den Heijer associate professor Faculty of Architecture,
Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Netherlands
hand-out of this presentation: http://managingtheuniversitycampus.nl/
downloads 2 IMBE research area | RE&H | TU Delft
The built environment can support innovation in technology campuses by using strategies that support the process of knowledge creation and diffusion in two ways. First, the design strategies of technology campuses can be used to -deliberately- accommodate in close proximity various users, whose activities and knowledge are close in relation. Second, the management strategies of technology campuses can be used to optimise such proximity while creating the opportunities for users to share activities and therefore, to strength the closeness of such relations.
Nowadays, universities, governments and industry increasingly build or expand technology campuses to encourage innovation for economic growth and development. With that assertion in mind, which has not been actually demonstrated to be true, technology campuses are built with similar characteristics: they are large-scale, clustered and (quasi)isolated built environments.
palo alto, usa eindhoven,nl
ithaca, usa
enschede,nl
cambridge, uk daejeon, kr
singapore, sg tsukuba, jp cambridge/boston, usa
espoo/helsinki, fi hsinchu, tw
beijing, cn
sendai, jp
berlin, de
shenzhen, cn
coimbra, pt
sittard-Geleen, nl
taichung, tw
amsterdam, nllisbon, pt
grenoble, fr
barcelona, es
tainan, tw
aachen, de
bremen, decottbus, dekansai/kyoto, jp
shanghai, cn
leiden, nl perth, au
côte d’azur, fr
novosibirsk, ru
munich,de
the triangle, usa zurich, ch
delft, nl
guildford, uk
2011$PhD$“Managing$the$$university$campus”$
2014$European$campus$
28$countries$$
2016$Technology$campuses$in$ci@es$
CONTENT Lessons for / from BK city
BK city is “new old” building of the Faculty of Architecture, after the fire in 2008
PHYSICAL definition of “campus”
city city
campus
campus
city buildings
buildings
buildings
buildings
the)“campus”)is)defined)as)the)(collecFon)of))buildings)and)land,)used)for)university)or)universityKrelated)funcFons))
FUNCTIONAL definition of “campus”
ACADEMIC: EDUCATION &
RESEARCH
RETAIL & LEISURE
RELATED BUSINESS
RESIDENTIAL
INFRASTRUCTURE
• ACADEMIC classrooms, library, offices, laboratories, lecture halls, ...
• RESIDENTIAL student housing, hotels, ...
• RELATED BUSINESS start-ups, incubators, industry, ...
• RETAIL & LEISURE sports, restaurants, cafes, ...
• INFRASTRUCTURE
proposition (PhD defence)
The campus of the future is a city
El)campus)del)futuro)es)una)ciudad.)))Le)campus)de)l'avenir)est)une)ville.)))Der)Campus)der)ZukunS)ist)eine)Stadt.))Kampus)budoucnosF)je)město.))FramFdens)campus)är)en)stad.))De)campus)van)de)toekomst)is)een)stad.))
Alexandra)den)Heijer)
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 2)
Campus model A The campus competes with the city – “new town development”
city
campus ACADEMIC: EDUCATION &
RESEARCH
RETAIL & LEISURE
RELATED BUSINESS
RESIDENTIAL
INFRASTRUCTURE
Campus model B Network university ! “UniverCity”
city
campus
ACADEMIC: EDUCATION &
RESEARCH
RETAIL & LEISURE
RELATED BUSINESS
RESIDENTIAL
INFRA-STRUCTURE
buildings buildings
Why study abroad? Reasons (not) to go)
reasons$to$go$1. academic)reputaFon ) )25%)
K)professors,)programme,))teaching)method,)rankings)))))
2. country)/)city)/)culture )24%))))
3. career)development ) )18%)K)employability,)learning)the)language,))personal/intercultural)relaFons)))))
4. university)services ) )17%)
5. social)life ) ) ) )11%)K)quality)of)life,)friends,)love))
reasons$not$to$go$1. academic)reputaFon ) ) )58%)
K)English)language)skills)of)staff,))workload)
2. city)/)culture) ) ) ) )18%)K)lack)of)integraFon)
3. social)life ) ) ) ) )10%)K)lack)of)organised)events)
4. university)services ) ) )10%)
source:)European)study)choice)pla`orm)“Study)Portals”)(2012))
PROPOSITIONS Students* become tourists – Cherish the European academic heritage
• location in inner city • heritage buildings: culture & industry • density of people • good public space • sense of place
city buildings
buildings
buildings
buildings
* and knowledge workers (professors, young potentials, ...))
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 3)
heritage$buildings$K)expensive)to)maintain)K)high)energy)costs))+)locaFon)historic)inner)city)+)users)accept)more)defects)+)reKuse)is)sustainable)+)unique)qualiFes)for)branding))!)business)case:)K)university)acFviFes)more)flexible)K)intensify)use)to)increase)benefits)/)m2))to)cover)the)(high))costs)/)m2)
FIRE)–)foto’s)
May)13,)2008)
$Movie$–$“The$unforgeEable$fire”$
Teletekst)–)bezoek)minister)
Emergency$$management$$<$3$days$$aIer$the$fire$
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 4)
2008 relocate >3000 students > 800 staff members in < 6 months use the opportunity of a crisis: implement radical changes irony: ultimate case study for research
ASSIGNMENT: relocate 3300 students and > 800 employees DEADLINE: renovate 32.000 m2< 6 months + new construction 4.000 m2 < next 6 months
Found a ‘new’ building within 10 days source photo: Municipality of Delft, 1925
sustainable = re-use
What we started with in June 2008…
luch`oto)gebouw)
Phase$1$J$EAST:$)16.000)m2)gfa)in)use)September)2008)
Phase$2$J$WEST:$)16.000)m2)gfa)in)use)November)2008)
Phase$3$–$GLASS$HOUSES:$)4.000)m2)gfa)new)in)use)May)2009)
Undergraduates < 4 months after fire Project ready < 1 year
TU)DelS)K)Faculty)of)Architecture))and)the)Built)Environment)
Architecture)(A))–)Urbanism)(U))–)Architectural)Engineering)+)Technology)(AE+T))–)Management)of)the)Built)Environment)(MBE)))!)chair)Real)Estate)Management)
MBE)
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 5)
LESSONS #1 Design the building as a city – keep the best places public, intensify use: density of people
Design the building as a city
important)are:)K)density)of)people)K)acknowledge)#)visitors)K)keep)best)places)public))
)K)orientaFon,)logical)floorplan)K)sense)of)place:)heritage)K)branding:)showroom,)legacy))
LESSONS #2 Reduce m2 - trade quantity for quality of space
42.000 m2
32.000 m2
inspiring
attractive
social
safe
healthy
Maslov (translated for) learning and working environment
Hierarchy of needs
original source (adapted): Blyth, A., & Worthington, J. (2001/2008), Managing the brief - for better design. London: Spon Press.
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 6)
WirtschaSsuniversität)(WU))Wien)design:)Zaha)Hadid)Architects,)2013)
Private)!)Public)space)
LESSONS #3 Invest in visible quality – “window dressing” / “distractions”
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 7)
Reducing$m2,$but$improving…$$$ $ $Quality$of$place$(interior$design)$
La Chaise&Screen,Charles&Ray Eames, 1948
Armchair, Ib Kofod-Lar-sen, ± 1950
LCM, Charles&Ray Eames, 1945 LCW, Charles&Ray Eames, 1945 Stool 60, Alvar Aalto,1933
Low Table Set, Frank Gehry,1972
LTR Table, Charles&RayEames, 1950
Revolt chair, Friso Kramer,1953
MedaMorph, Alberto Meda,2006
MedaPro+, Alberto Meda,1998
Chair, W.H. Gispen, 1929-1930
Metal Side Table,Ronan&Erwan Bouroullec,
Daybed, George Nelson, 1948 Nelson Tables, GeorgeNelson, 1960
Chair, unknown,1900-1910
EA108, Charles&Ray Eames,1958
Folding chair Dafne, RinaldiGastone, 1980
EA124, Charles&Ray Eames,1958
Elephant Stool, Sori Yanagi,1954
Armchair, G. Th Rietveld,1927
Elliptical Table ETR, Charles&Ray Eames, 1951 Gueridon, Jean Prouvé, 1949 Fauteuil, N.K. Roerichl,1904
EM Table, Jean Prouvé, 1950
Freeform Sofa, Isamu Noguchi, 1946 Armchair, Han Pieck, 1946-1948 Joyn, Ronan&Erwan Bouroullec, 200244 45
source: BK city guide – see http://www.bk.tudelft.nl/bkcity - photos & furniture by VITRA - http://www.vitra.com
foto)Arie)Graafland)
foto)Oranje)tribune)+)Lensveld)prijs?)
LESSONS #4 Embrace academic history – use heritage for branding
Reducing$m2,$but$improving…$$$ $ $Quality$of$place$(cultural$heritage)$
Reducing$m2,$but$improving…$$$ $ $Quality$of$life$(campus$&$city)$
Campus of the future: - more quality, less quantity - new life for old buildings (photo: Maastricht)
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 8)
InternaFonal)references:)K )Heidelberg)K )Uppsala)K )Sorbonne)/)Paris)K )Glasgow)K )Gent)
Uppsala,)Sweden)
Paris,)France) Heidelberg,)Germany)
Glasgow,)UK)city city
campus
campus city buildings
buildings
buildings
buildings
from:$hEp://www.bbc.com/news/businessJ26925463$$“Online$students$can’t$help$being$sociable”$(April$9,$2014)$$It$was$a$revolu@on$moving$higher$educa@on$from$bricks$to$clicks…$and$now$it's$started$to$go$back$to$bricks$again.$)Online)university)providers,)which)offered)people)the)chance)to)study)from)home,)are)turning)full)circle)by)creaFng)a)network)of)learning)centres)where)students)can)meet)and)study)together.))Instead)of)demolishing)the)dusty)old)classrooms)of)academia,)the)online)university)revoluFon)is)responsible)for)opening)some)new)ones.))Coursera,)a)major)CaliforniaKbased)provider)of)online)courses,)is)creaFng)an)internaFonal)network)of)"learning)hubs",)where)students)can)follow)these)virtual)courses)in)realKlife,)bricks)and)mortar)seungs.))They're)scheduled)and)arranged)online,)with)the)only)vital)ingredients)being)a)laptop,)wiKfi)and)somewhere)to)talk.)
“The)typical)compleFon)rate)for)a)MOOC)is)about)5%)to)10%.))For)MOOC)students)(“Moocers”))a4ending)learning)hubs,)the)compleFon)rates)are)between)30%)and)100%.”))Source:)Coursera))(7)mln)students))
luch`oto)campus) LESSONS #5 Avoid individual territory (“no names on the door”)
John 1,0 Dion 0,8
Gerard 1,0 (0,8)
Fred 1,0 Loes 0,6
Eva-C. 1,0
Monika 0,3 + Fridjof 0,4 (+)
Barbara 0,8
Erwin 1,0 Steffen 1,0 Guido 1,0
Jeroen B. 0,8
Marie-Therese 0,4 Andre 0,6
Everaert 0,5
Koos 1,0 (0,8)
SECRETARIAAT - Angie
- Anuschka - Laura
- Shanti
Ceciel 0,9
Marja 0,8 Jildou 0,9
“Cellular office symbolic for cellular research”
MSc-lab
MSc-lab - 50%
Leentje 1,0 Ellen 1,0 Louis 1,0 Ezra 1,0
Peter-Paul 1,0 Ruud B. 1,0 Rein dG 0,4 Casper 0,2 Stojanovic
Hans W. 0,8
Ada 0,8
Clarien 0,8 + UD Housing Management
Wout 1,0 (0,8) Ineke 0,6
“on a busy day: less than 20% of the desks
is occupied”
source: various utilization studies
LESSONS #6
Implement flexible concepts – mixed use – but avoid standardization and “open plan”
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 9)
Changing)the)academic)office) Office)space)
K )no)individual)territory)K )12)m2)usable)per)Se))!)became)more)aSer)design)process)K )acFvity)related)concept))a. SILENT)ROOMS)b. LIVING)ROOMS)c. MEETING)ROOMS)
K)formal)/)informal)d. TEAM)OFFICES)
Library:)quiet)place)to)study)Space types on campus, example NL
sanitary3% storage
10%
special storage2%
office33%
support10%
restaurant4%
education16%
specific, incl. laboratories
21%
residential1%
SFmulate)social)interacFon)&)intellectual)interacFon)
Campus of the future: - intensive and flexible use of high quality facilities
… at our Faculty of Architecture & the Built Environment …
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 10)
LESSONS #7
Make it feel like home – “home away from home”
photos: DUWO
Community)building)
LESSONS #8
Allow students + staff to decorate their working environment
STUDIO space Sept 1, 2008 Sept 4, 2008
Sept 18, 2008 Sept 18, 2008
Studio)space)
K )student)back)at)the)faculty)K )6)m2)usable)per)workplace))K !)became)less)aSer)decision)process))K )tables)are)assigned)to)groups)of)students))per)semester)(no)permanent)territory))K )smart)use)of)space)(by)smart)scheduling))
CREATE)“HOME)AWAY)FROM)HOME”)
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 11)
LESSONS #9
Make it a showroom with the best products of students + staff
LESSONS #10 Make sure people can see each other work for security, community building, serendipity ! innovation
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 12)
Campus of the future: - transparency of processes to inspire and learn from each other
Campus of the future: - transparency of processes: to support image of faculties and university
students)and)academic)staff)sharing)workspace)!))reducing)the)footprint,)improving)interacFon)
Alexandra)den)Heijer) 07/03/16)
h4p://www.managingtheuniversitycampus.nl) 13)
LESSONS #1 Design the building as a city #2 Reduce m2 - trade quantity for quality of space #3 Invest in visible quality – “window dressing” / “distractions” #4 Embrace academic history – use heritage for branding #5 Avoid individual territory (“no names on the door”) #6 Implement flexible concepts – mixed use – but avoid standardization and “open plan” #7 Make it feel like home – (“home away from home”) #8 Allow students + staff to decorate their working environment #9 Make it a showroom (with the best products of students + staff) #10 Make sure people can see each other work (for security, community building, serendipity ! innovation)
hand-out of this presentation: http://managingtheuniversitycampus.nl/
downloads 2 IMBE research area | RE&H | TU Delft
The built environment can support innovation in technology campuses by using strategies that support the process of knowledge creation and diffusion in two ways. First, the design strategies of technology campuses can be used to -deliberately- accommodate in close proximity various users, whose activities and knowledge are close in relation. Second, the management strategies of technology campuses can be used to optimise such proximity while creating the opportunities for users to share activities and therefore, to strength the closeness of such relations.
Nowadays, universities, governments and industry increasingly build or expand technology campuses to encourage innovation for economic growth and development. With that assertion in mind, which has not been actually demonstrated to be true, technology campuses are built with similar characteristics: they are large-scale, clustered and (quasi)isolated built environments.
palo alto, usa eindhoven,nl
ithaca, usa
enschede,nl
cambridge, uk daejeon, kr
singapore, sg tsukuba, jp cambridge/boston, usa
espoo/helsinki, fi hsinchu, tw
beijing, cn
sendai, jp
berlin, de
shenzhen, cn
coimbra, pt
sittard-Geleen, nl
taichung, tw
amsterdam, nllisbon, pt
grenoble, fr
barcelona, es
tainan, tw
aachen, de
bremen, decottbus, dekansai/kyoto, jp
shanghai, cn
leiden, nl perth, au
côte d’azur, fr
novosibirsk, ru
munich,de
the triangle, usa zurich, ch
delft, nl
guildford, uk
2011$$PhD$thesis$
2014$European$campus$
2016$Technology$campuses$in$ci@es$
OPTIONAL$Movie$–$“The$making$of$BK$city”$$online$version$see:$hEp://managingtheuniversitycampus.nl/caseJbkJcity$$