March 25, 2009 Iviewit Intel Corporation SEC Complaint Regarding Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel...

8/9/2019 March 25, 2009 Iviewit Intel Corporation SEC Complaint Regarding Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel Shareholders

1/35

Page 1 of 8

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

I-VIEW-IT HOLDINGS INC.

I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Eliot I. BernsteinFounder & Inventor

Direct Dial: (561) 245-8588


SEC Chairperson Mary ShapiroSEC Office of Chief Accountant

SEC Office of International Affairs

SEC Office of International Enforcement AssistanceSEC Division of Enforcement

SEC Office of Internet Enforcement

SEC Division of Corporate Finance

SEC Division of Corporate Finance Chief Accountant's Office ( CF-OCA )

Federal Bureau of Investigation – White Collar Crime Unit

Complaint by Letter:

SEC Complaint Center100 F Street NE,

Washington, D.C. 20549-0213Complaint by Telefax: 703-813-6965

Complaint by Email: [email protected]

Re: Complaint - Regarding Intel Corporation and Possible Trillion Dollar

Fraud on Intel Shareholders and Others

Intel Corporate Mailing Address

2200 Mission College Blvd.

Santa Clara, CA 95054-1549Intel Phone Numbers as of March 23, 2009: (408) 765-8080 MAIN NUMBER (800) 321-

4044 FAX: (408) 765-9904BBS: WEB SITE: http://www.intel.com FTP SITE: ftp://ftp.intel.com

TO: SEC Chairperson Mary Shapiro; SEC Office of Chief Accountant; Head of SEC

Office's of International Affairs, SEC International Enforcement Assistance, SECDivision of Enforcement, SEC Office of Internet Enforcement, SEC Division of

Corporate Finance, SEC Division of Corporate Finance Office of Chief Accountant, FBI


2/35

SEC COMPLAINT INTEL CORPORATION Page 2 of 8


Re: Complaint - Regarding Intel Corporation and Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel

Shareholders and Others

Iviewit Holdings, Inc./Iviewit Technologies, Inc.

2753 N.W. 34th St. Boca Raton, Florida 33434-3459

(561) 245.8588 (o) / (561) 886.7628 (c) / (561) 245-8644 (f)[email protected] - www.iviewit.tv

White Collar Crime Division and Any and All Compliance Division Heads and Related

Offices:

I, Eliot Bernstein, of 2753 NW 34th

Street, Boca Raton, Florida 33434 as theOriginal Owner and Inventor of key "backbone technologies" for video and imaging as

further described herein, am filing this formal complaint against Intel Corporation ( Intel

) with United States headquarters located at 2200 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Ca,95054-1459, and bring to your attention ongoing investigations involving multiple

federal offices around the country as well as International investigations pertinent in this

matter.

Intel is a primary wrongdoer as a named defendant in a presently pending Trillion

Dollar international RICO conspiracy lawsuit1 involving the theft and fraud of my

Intellectual Property rights as further set out herein. In addition to liabilities claimed in

this lawsuit, are separate direct primary liabilities and obligations from signed agreementsincluding Non Disclosure’s, Strategic Partner Agreements and Licensing Agreements.

Further, on information and belief Intel corporate management including at least the

President, Paul S. Otellini and corporate counsel Bruce D. Sewell, and Stephen R.Rodgers are also involved in an ongoing and undisclosed massive international Fraud

against the Intel shareholders and investors.

Upon information and belief, the frauds include but are not limited to the failure

to disclose both the lawsuit and the Intellectual Property infringements in direct violationof various SEC laws and rules including but not limited to FASB No. 5 requirements for

disclosing liabilities and more. Merely one claim in this lawsuit involves the attemptedMurder upon my family by an Iraqi style car bombing that blew up three vehicles in

addition to mine during the early phases of the high stakes corporate theft and fraud ofmy Intellectual Property rights. Notably, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin referred to thisas a case involving Murder that has also been marked as legally “related” by Scheindlin

to an ongoing Federal Whistleblower case2.

1 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket – (08-4873-cv) Bernstein, et al. v

Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee et al., on appeal fromUSDC - Souhern District NY (07cv11196) Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First DepartmentDisciplinary Committee, et al.2 (07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT, other related

cases:(08cv4053) Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.(07cv11612) Esposito v The State of New York, et al.,(08cv00526) Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.,(08cv02391) McKeown v The State of New York, et al.,(08cv02852) Galison v The State of New York, et al.,(08cv03305) Carvel v The State of New York, et al., and,(08cv4438) Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.


3/35








In summary, dating back to 1998-1999 at the time the inventions were discovered,

I had Signed Non Disclosure Agreements, Strategic Alliance Agreements and Licensing

Arrangements, including Agreements that were at the time in legal review for R3D

relating to the USE of my proprietary rights in inventions which were hailed as the "HolyGrail" of the internet. The technologies were deemed the “Holy Grail” by multiple

experts under signed NDA’s as it permitted full screen full frame rate video previouslythought impossible and zoom and pan imaging technologies which removed pixel

distortion. The stolen technologies are now commonly found on virtually all digital

imaging and video hardware and software. These signed agreements were amongst

hundreds of signed agreements with many Fortune 1000 Companies. After signingAgreements with Real 3D, Inc. ( R3D ), a company whose ownership was composed of

Lockheed Martin ( 70% ), Intel ( 20% ) and Silicon Graphics Inc. ( 10% ), Intel later took

over complete ownership of R3D of Orlando Florida.

In the subsequent months thereafter, a series of critical events occurred including but not limited to the discovery of fraudulent patent applications and the discovery of

fraudulent corporations, the corporate frauds were discovered by Arthur Andersen duringan audit for the largest investor in the companies Crossbow Ventures of W. Palm Beach

Florida. Nearly two-thirds of the Crossbow funds were secured through SBIC loans from

the Small Business Administration making the SBA the largest investor in thetechnologies and companies. On information and belief, the SBA Inspector General’s

office is conducting an ongoing investigation into these and other matters please refer to

the SBA Inspector General’s office to obtain relevant information.

As you will see by the letter and petition to the 44th

US President, Barack Hussein

Obama II, found @

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf

and also sent to US Attorney General Eric Holder, I was then directed by Harry I. Moatz,

Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office of Enrollment and

Discipline to file charges with the Commissioner of Patents claiming Fraud Upon theUSPTO, my companies and myself. This led to the Suspension of certain Intellectual

Properties while investigations remain ongoing; please refer to Moatz and the

Commissioner of Patents office to obtain relevant information. In addition, Moatzdirected me to seek Congressional Legislation to obtain an Act of Congress to correct the

falsified Oaths on my Intellectual Properties submitted by my former legal counsel at the

law firms of Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Schlissel, Foley & Lardner and Proskauer Rose.

An Act of Congress is necessary to make the changes in inventors, owners and assigneesthat are fraudulent, for which we have sought aid from The Honorable Senator Dianne

Feinstein who remains working through her offices regarding such.


4/35








These backbone technologies which were stolen in 1998-1999 have since been

used throughout the United States and across the globe throughout the entire value chain

of content creation and distribution of video and images for both software and hardware

in the transmission of Digital Video and Imaging across all spectrums, including, theInternet, Television, DVD, HD DVD, Micro Processing Chips, as well as, a mass of

applications for Defense, Flight & Space Simulation, including on the Hubble SpaceTelescope (providing a deeper view into time) and on virtually all Medical Imaging

Devices, and more. In fact, members of R3D and Intel were some of the earliest

champions of the value of the technologies claiming they were “Priceless” and were

valued in the hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars over the life of the IntellectualProperties, having transformed the world of digital imaging and video that now are

considered part of daily life.

Intel was one of the earliest players in this scheme and has continued to not only

defraud myself and the other rightful owners of the technologies, including EllenDeGeneres and Alanis Morissette, but has simultaneously defrauded the Intel's

shareholders and investors for years by failing to report and disclose the liabilities withfull knowledge of their binding obligations regarding the technologies. These frauds and

failures by the Intel management team have continued despite multiple communications

over several years that have gone directly to the President of Intel, Mr. Paul S. Otelliniand their Corporate Counsel Mr. Bruce D. Sewell and Steven R. Rodgers and continue

despite the knowledge of the signed Agreements.

At this time, however, as noted in my Feb. 2009 letter to the Office of the USPresident Barack Hussein Obama II and the US Attorney General Eric Holder, I wish to

bring to your direct attention the identities of several federal offices already involved in

this ongoing national and international Intellectual Properties theft and fraud.Investigations that will aid and facilitate the SEC with background information for the

proper performance of complete investigations by the SEC allowing for information

sharing with these agencies, some of the key offices are as follows:

1. Glenn A. Fine, Office of Inspector General of the US Department of Justice

2. Harry Moatz, Director, OED of the USPTO

3. H. Marshall Jarrett, Office of Professional Responsibility of the FBI

4. A complete list of Federal, State & International Actions can be found @http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/INVESTIGATIONS%20MASTER.htm.

Please note that I provide the SEC and the various Office and Division heads this

background solely as a starting point for full and proper investigations of Intel and related

parties in this matter and that I remain personally available to provide further informationas necessary. It should be noted that a wealth of the history of these matters is available


5/35








at my website www.iviewit.tv including links to the current federal complaint filed in the US

Court of Appeals 2nd

Circ., the complaint filed with the US District Court – Southern

District of New York, links to the hundreds of signed NDAs, Strategic Alliance

Agreements, License Agreements and more.

It should be further noted that Intel failed to even Disclose the liabilities, even as a

Footnote, in their Annual Reports signed by Ernst & Young for both calendar years 1999thru 2007 despite the fact that they had engaged in specific communications and / or

received specific communications from 1999-2009 regarding the outstanding obligations

and liabilities associated with Intel's improper use and infringement of my IntellectualProperty rights. See attached emails of 2006-2009 and Intel Annual Statements of 2006-

2007.

Not only did Intel later acquire in whole the R3D company which was intimately

involved in the early phases of this matter and under signed agreements with mycompany, but specific members of Intel/ R3D staff were present during key meetings in

the early phases and otherwise involved in these matters including but not limited to,

Lawrence Palley (Director of Business Development @ Intel), Gerald W. Stanley(Chairman of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer @ R3D), David Bolton

(Corporate Counsel @ R3D & Lockheed Martin), Steven A. Behrens (Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer @ R3D), Rosalie Bibona (Program Manager @ R3D), TimothyP. Connolly (Director, Engineering @ R3D), Richard Gentner (Director of Scalable

Graphics Systems @ R3D), Connie Martin (Director, Software Development @ R3D),

Diane H. Sabol (Director and Corporate Controller Finance & Administration @ R3D),Rob Kyanko (Intel), Michael Silver (@ ?), Ryan Huisman (@ R3D), Matt Johannsen (@

R3D), Hassan Miah (@ Intel), Dennis Goo (Manager, Digital Home Content for the

Americas @ Intel), Rajeev Kapur (Chief of Staff, Enterprise Product Group @ Intel) and

Kostas Katsohirakis (Business Development Manager @ Intel).

Moreover, as expressly indicated to Intel, the suit presently in litigation in the US

Second Circuit Court of Appeals is but one of many forums where these matters may be pursued such as other federal courts within the United States and a variety of forums

abroad as well. As the Intellectual Property crimes are investigated and the IP removed

from its current Suspension status3 by the USPTO of course, those claims will be further

pursued as Intel is well aware of. Thus, it is submitted that part of this review andinvestigation by the SEC should likely involve prior transactions such as the purchase

and sale of R3D and related transactions.

Several of the following links will also provide additional background

information:

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/08/justice-dept-widens-patentgate-probe.html

3 http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/USPTO%20Suspension%20Notices.pdf


6/35








http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2008/11/breaking-news.html

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2008/04/ny-ethics-scandal-tied-to-international.html

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/08/justice-dept-widens-patentgate-probe.html

Thank you in advance for your time, effort

and consideration of these matters,

________________________Eliot I. Bernstein

Founder & Inventor

Iviewit Technologies, Inc.

cc & ec:

Ernst & Young – Accountancy for Intel

The Honorable John Conyers Jr. ~ Chairman, House Judiciary Committee

The Honorable Glenn Fine ~ Inspector General, United States Department of

Justice

John J. Doll ~ Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property andActing Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office - Deputy Under

Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the

United States Patent and Trademark Office

The Honorable Harry I. Moatz ~ Director, Office of Enrollment & Discipline,United States Patent & Trademark Office

Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. ~ Attorney General, United States

The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein

Andrew Cuomo ~ Attorney General of New York State, State of New YorkOffice of the Attorney General

Charlie Crist, Governor, State of Florida

CNN; MSNBC; FOX; NY TIMES; Washington Post; LA Times; Miami Herald;


7/35


8/35








Other Select Media and Political Contacts

Intellectual Property Interest Holders and Iviewit former Shareholders

Enclosure(s) – All Uniform Resource Locators incorporated in entirety by reference herein.

Exhibit 1 – Intel Correspondences

cmb


9/35








Exhibit 1 – Intel Correspondences


10/35

From: Eliot I. Bernstein [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eliot I. BernsteinSent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 1:33 PMTo: Paul S. Otellini, President and Chief Executive Officer @ Intel Corporation

([email protected]); D. Bruce Sewell, Senior Vice President - General Counsel @ IntelCorporation ([email protected]); Steven R. Rodgers, Vice President and Associate GeneralCounsel Legal and Corporate Affairs, Director Litigation @ Intel Corporation

([email protected])Cc: 'Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire'; 'Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. - Jackoway TyermanWertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris'; 'Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.'; 'MarcR. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.'; 'Andrew R. Dietz @ Rock-It Cargo USA IncorporatedLA'; 'Barry Becker @ Rock-It Cargo USA, Inc.'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'Subject: IVIEWIT URGENT - 3 Hour Good Faith Window of Opportunity

I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Surf with Vision

Dear Mssrs Otellini, Sewell & Rodgers:

As you are all directly aware, a number of good faith attempts to resolve outstanding business matters have been made over the years including very recent communications

offering for a limited time to enter into an Agreement to Agree on resolving outstanding

legal liabilities stemming from the ongoing litigation and Intellectual Property

infringements through intelligent, responsible business agreements.

At this time, however, despite being referred by Mr. Otellini's office to key Management

personnel at Intel such as Mr. Stephen Rodgers, Director of Litigation, no returncommunication or even phone call has been received. I can only presume at this time

that this means that the present Intel Management is choosing to forego responsible

business agreements while simultaneously disregarding FASB accounting and other SEC

accounting requirements and laws.

I have enclosed my Letter to the SEC that will be transmitted via fax, email and direct

mail at 3 pm EST today unless some action is taken by Intel to resolve these mattersthrough a business and licensing arrangement. As you will all note, the SEC letter

references all of your names, as well as prior communications with Intel Management,and a host of Intel representatives previously involved in these matters.

If I have not heard from Intel by 3 pm EST time today, this next step in adversarial

actions will be taken instead of the amicable, responsible, sound business path to resolvethese matters as I have offered.

Thank you,


11/35

Eliot I. BernsteinInventor


2753 N.W. 34th St.

Boca Raton, Florida 33434-3459(561) 245.8588 (o)

(561) 886.7628 (c)

(561) 245-8644 (f)[email protected]

www.iviewit.tv

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This message and any attachments are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. SS 2510-2521.

This e-mail message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the

sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message or call (561) 245-8588. If you are the intended recipient but donot wish to receive communications through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.


12/35

From: Eliot I. Bernstein [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 7:07 PM

To: Paul S. Otellini, President and Chief Executive Officer @ Intel Corporation([email protected]); Steven R. Rodgers, Vice President and Associate General Counsel Legaland Corporate Affairs, Director, Litigation @ Intel Corporation ([email protected])Cc: '[email protected]'; Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire ([email protected]); MicheleM. Mulrooney Esq. - Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris([email protected]); Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.; Marc R. GarberEsq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C. ([email protected]); 'Andy Dietz'; 'Barry Becker'Subject: FW: URGENT 24 HR Iviewit Demand Letter for Intellectual Property Infringement &Lawsuit Liability Exposure

Dear Mr. Otellini and Mr. Rodgers ~ please accept this courtesy copy of an email DEMANDLETTER relating to a liability to Intel of ONE TRILLION DOLLARS for PATENT INFRINGEMENT

AND A FEDERAL LAWSUIT YOUR COMPANY IS NAMED IN. I have sent information regardingthis matter to your corporate counsel for delivery to you and had wished that prior to more formalactions on my part you would have called regarding the information in the letter addressed to youin the attached PDF file. Upon calling your offices today for such confirmation, I was referredback to counsel who has not returned a timely call. If you I do not hear back from your offices byMonday at 3pm EST I will infer that Intel has choose not to discuss these matters other than withFederal authorities. Thank you ~ Eliot Bernstein

From: Eliot I. Bernstein [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 3:48 PMTo: 'Sewell, Bruce'Cc: '[email protected]'; 'Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire'; 'Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. -Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris'; 'Marc R. Garber Esq. @ FlasterGreenberg P.C.'; 'Andy Dietz'; 'Barry Becker'; 'Guy Iantoni'Subject: RE: URGENT 24 HR Iviewit Demand Letter for Intellectual Property Infringement &Lawsuit Liability Exposure

Bruce ~ I appreciate your empathy both personally and on behalf of Intel and look forward to atimely response from the appropriate parties mentioned in my letters. ~ Eliot

I VIEW IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Surf with Vision


13/35

Eliot I. Bernstein

InventorIviewit Technologies, Inc.

2753 N.W. 34th St.


(561) 886.7628 (c)(561) 245-8644 (f)[email protected]

www.iviewit.tv

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This message and any attachments are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. SS 2510-2521.



sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message or call (561) 245-8588. If you are the intended recipient but do

not wish to receive communications through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.

From: Sewell, Bruce [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 2:48 PMTo: Eliot I. BernsteinCc: [email protected]; 'Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire'; 'Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. -Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris'; 'Marc R. Garber Esq. @ FlasterGreenberg P.C.'; 'Andy Dietz'; 'Barry Becker'Subject: RE: URGENT 24 HR Iviewit Demand Letter for Intellectual Property Infringement &Lawsuit Liability Exposure

Dear Mr. Bernstein,

I am indeed sorry that you feel anyone has threatened your family. Suchan belief is in no way a game and on that point we can certainly agree.Of course neither Intel not any individual connected with Intel has anyknowledge of such a matter.

Thank you for your letter. We will consider the points you have raisedand take the appropriate action.

Best regards,

Bruce Sewell

From: Eliot I. Bernstein [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 10:23 AMTo: Sewell, Bruce


14/35

Cc: [email protected]; 'Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire'; 'Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. -Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris'; 'Marc R. Garber Esq. @ FlasterGreenberg P.C.'; 'Andy Dietz'; 'Barry Becker'

Subject: URGENT 24 HR Iviewit Demand Letter for Intellectual Property Infringement & LawsuitLiability Exposure


Surf with Vision

Dear Mr. Sewell, please read the attached PDF file which we demand you forward to theCEO and COB of Intel with the attached letter to them within the timeframe of 24 hours

outlined in the letter. Thank you



2753 N.W. 34th St.


(561) 886.7628 (c)

(561) 245-8644 (f)[email protected]

www.iviewit.tv







15/35


16/35


17/35


18/35


19/35


20/35


21/35


22/35


23/35


24/35


25/35

From: Eliot I. Bernstein [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 7:13 PMTo: Paul S. Otellini, President and Chief Executive Officer @ Intel Corporation([email protected]); Steven R. Rodgers, Vice President and Associate General Counsel Legaland Corporate Affairs, Director, Litigation @ Intel Corporation ([email protected])

Subject: FW: FEDERAL COMPLAINT SERVICE Docket No. 08-4873-cv FINAL SIGNED BRIEFPLAINTIFF-APPELLANT BERNSTEIN USCA 2nd Circ 13988ll.pdf - Adobe Acrobat Professional

From: Eliot I. Bernstein [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 11:23 PMTo: D. Bruce Sewell, Senior Vice President - General Counsel @ IntelCorporation([email protected])Cc: Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire ([email protected]); Marc R. Garber Esq. @ FlasterGreenberg P.C.; Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. - Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer AustenMandelbaum & Morris ([email protected])Subject: FEDERAL COMPLAINT SERVICE Docket No. 08-4873-cv FINAL SIGNED BRIEF

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT BERNSTEIN USCA 2nd Circ 13988ll.pdf - Adobe Acrobat Professional

D. Bruce Sewell and Lawrence S. Palley,

Please accept the following as service of my Brief in the USCA 2nd

Circ. as INTEL

CORPORATION and Lawrence S. Palley, Director of Business Development are namedDefendants in these matters. Please report this liability to all proper regulatory agencies,

shareholders, and liability carriers. Thank you, Eliot Bernstein

From: Eliot I. Bernstein [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 7:05 PMTo: Deborah Holmes, Deputy Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; Pro SeCases @ United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; Civil Cases @ United States Court

of Appeals for the Second CircuitCc: Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire; Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.; MicheleM. Mulrooney Esq. - Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris; 'Andy Dietz';Barry Becker @ Rock-It Cargo USA, Inc.; [email protected]; 'Guy Iantoni'; Frank Brady @ ExposeCorrupt CourtsSubject: Docket No. 08-4873-cv FINAL SIGNED BRIEF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT BERNSTEIN USCA2nd Circ 13988ll.pdf - Adobe Acrobat Professional

I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Surf with Vision Dear Deborah,

I have enclosed, per our conversations and your instructions, a PDF copy of my FINAL

SIGNED BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT BERNSTEIN USCA 2nd Circ forDocket No. 08-4873-cv. I have also sent the document via US Mail as you specified and

thus this electronic communication and the mailed copy should constitute a timely filing.

I have attached in the document the following,

1. US Postmaster Certified Letter Receipts showing the same Document as attachedherein has been mailed and postmarked with the date Friday, February 27

th 2009,

2. A signed Electronic Notification Agreement,


26/35

3. A Signed Anti-Virus Certification Form of which a virus check was performed,

4. A Signed Notice of Appearance Form and5. A Signed Brief.

If you need additional information, please feel free to contact me.



2753 N.W. 34th St.Boca Raton, Florida 33434-3459

(561) 245.8588 (o)

(561) 886.7628 (c)(561) 245-8644 (f)[email protected]

www.iviewit.tv

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This message and any attachments are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. SS 2510-2521.





From: Eliot I. Bernstein [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 7:13 PMTo: D. Bruce Sewell, Senior Vice President - General Counsel @ IntelCorporation([email protected]); Paul S. Otellini, President and Chief Executive Officer @Intel Corporation ([email protected]); Steven R. Rodgers, Vice President and AssociateGeneral Counsel Legal and Corporate Affairs, Director, Litigation @ Intel Corporation([email protected])Cc: Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire ([email protected]); Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. -Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris ([email protected]);Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.; Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.([email protected]); 'Andy Dietz'; 'Barry Becker'; '[email protected]'Subject: INTEL DEFENDANT IN FEDERAL LAWSUIT

Please see the attached Amended Complaint wherein Intel is a Named Defendant in a Trillion

Dollar Lawsuit. Please report this liability to all proper regulatory agencies, shareholdersand liability carriers. Thank you, Eliot Bernstein


27/35


Surf with Vision

Eliot I. Bernstein

InventorIviewit Technologies, Inc.

2753 N.W. 34th St.


(561) 886.7628 (c)

(561) 245-8644 (f)

[email protected] www.iviewit.tv


This e-mail message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privilegedmaterial. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the



- - - - - Or i gi nal Message- - - - -

From: El i ot I van Ber nst ei n [ mai l t o: i vi ewi t @i vi ewi t . t v]Sent : Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10: 54 AM To: ' D. Br uce Sewel l ( bruce. sewel l @i nt el . com) ' ;' l ar r y. pal l ey@i nt el . com'Subj ect : Br uce I nt el and Lar r y Pal l ey ar e named def endant s i n a f eder all awsui t

Dear Br uce,

Bot h I ntel and Lawr ence Pal l ey are named def endants i n t he at t achedf ederal compl ai nt . Pl ease not i f y any l i abi l i t y carr i ers of t hi sacti on.

Thank you,

El i ot I . Bernstei nFounder & I nvent orI vi ewi t Technol ogi es, I nc.I vi ewi t Hol di ngs, I nc.39 Li t t l e AveRed Bl uf f , Cal i f or ni a 96080- 3519( 530) 529- 4110 (o)( 530) 526- 5751 ( c)


28/35

i vi ewi t @i vi ewi t . t vwww. i vi ewi t . t v

THI S MESSAGE AND I TS EMBEDDED FI LES I NCORPORATED HEREI N CONTAI NI NFORMATI ON THAT I S PROPRI ETARY AND CONFI DENTI AL PRI VI LEGEDI NFORMATI ON. I F YOU ARE NOT THE I NTENDED RECI PI ENT, YOU ARE PROHI BI TEDFROM READI NG, OPENI NG, PRI NTI NG, COPYI NG, FORWARDI NG, OR SAVI NG THI SMAI L AND I TS ATTACHMENTS. PLEASE DELETE THE MESSAGE AND I TS EMBEDDEDFI LES WI THOUT READI NG, OPENI NG, PRI NTI NG, COPYI NG, FORWARDI NG, ORSAVI NG THEM, AND NOTI FY THE SENDER I MMEDI ATELY AT ( 530) 529- 4110. I F

YOU ARE THE I NTENDED RECI PI ENT, YOU ARE PROHI BI TED FROM FORWARDI NG THEMOR OTHERWI SE DI SCLOSI NG THESE CONTENTS TO OTHERS, UNLESS EXPRESSLYDESI GNATED BY THE SENDER. THANK YOU!

From: P. Stephen Lamont [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 8:14 PMTo: Sewell, BruceCc: Eliot I. Bernstein; Caroline P. Rogers Esq.; Andrew Dietz; Simon, David; Rodgers, Steve RSubject: RE: Email to Paul S. Otellini

Mr. Sewell:

Thank you for your quick response on behalf of Intel, and, of course, Iviewit will abide by yourwishes and communicate directly with you in the immediate future. Iviewit has the reputation inthe community for creating those solutions necessary for the benefit of our children and ourchildren's children.

Moreover, and perhaps this was not made clear in my previous email, but Iviewit's irritation stemsmore from the fact that contracts were walked away from in 1999, whereby Iviewit presented toReal 3D, taught them how to scale video and zoom on images without pixelation and for deliveryover low bandwidth networks (clearly, we later found that such solutions apply to all networks atany higher bandwidth), witnessed Real 3D's validation of same, executed NDA's and alliancecontracts with Real 3D, saw the acquisition by Intel with the promise that they would abide bysuch confidentialities and contracts, then saw the then Intel employees halt any furthercommunication. Second to this issue would be my recent discussion with SSG and DHGconcerning Viiv, where you may know better than I what future business emphasis may besteered for this platform.

Additionally, grant it, I was not a participant, as I only assumed my post in December 2001, but atthis point may I suggest a reverse chronological approach that might bring us to the heart of thematters in a quicker fashion:

• I have attached my email of December 12 to Rajeev Kapur (SSG) and David Vogel (DHG);

• Attached v-cards for those SSG and DHG employees concerned;

• Mutual production of executed Iviewit and Real 3D contracts that Intel assumed;

• Mutual production of Iviewit and Real 3D NDA's that Intel assumed; and

• As Intel is intimately familiar with its just past Managing Director in the Intel Capital Group,Hassan Miah, a discussion with Mr. Miah, as to what Iviewit is and what Iviewit does (v-cardattached for your convenience), and a discussion with former head of Real 3D, GeraldStanley, is in order (contact information unknown to Iviewit).


29/35

Iviewit looks forward to your response to this proposed approach and working together with Intelon these matters, and hopefully my friends in SSG and DHG; as should be clear from the emailhistory attached, it is not Iviewit's style nor interest in a quick payment, but keeping our eye on thereal prize, 105 million U.S. digital households, together.

Email of December12, 2006.pdf...

Hassan Miah Rajeev Kapur Kostas Katsohirakis David S Law David Vogel

Best regards,

P. Stephen LamontChief Executive Officer

Iviewit Technologies, Inc.39 Little AvenueRed Bluff, Cal. 96080Tel: 914-217-0038Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] URL: www.iviewit.tv

THIS MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES INCORPORATED HEREINBY REFERENCE CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PROPRIETARY ANDCONFIDENTIAL,PRIVILEGED INFORMATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM READING, OPENING, PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING,OR SAVING THIS MAIL AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES. PLEASE DELETETHE MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES WITHOUT READING,

OPENING, PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING, OR SAVING THEM, AND NOTIFY THESENDER IMMEDIATELY AT 530.526.5750. IF YOU ARE THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU

ARE PROHIBITED FROM FORWARDING THEM OR OTHERWISE DISCLOSING THESECONTENTS TO OTHERS, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SENDER.

-----Original Message-----From: Sewell, Bruce [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 6:28 PMTo: [email protected] Cc: Rodgers, Steve R; Simon, DavidSubject: Email to Paul S. Otellini

Dear Mr. Lamont,

Given the nature of the allegations contained in your e-mail to Mr. Otellini dated March 6, 2007, Ihave been asked to respond to you on behalf of Intel Corporation.

Intel treats the use of third party intellectual property very seriously. We endeavor to investigateand resolve any legitimate claim of unlicensed use that is brought to our attention. At the sametime we are frequently a target for spurious or premature claims by individuals or companies


30/35

hoping for a quick nuisance payment. In order to properly characterize and respond to yourassertions I must ask you to provide us with some more pertinent information about the nature ofthe intellectual property you believe you own and the basis for your claim that certain Intelproducts may infringe those rights. Specifically, please provide the following information at yourconvenience so that we may properly analyze your claims:

the number, date of issuance, and ownership for each patent or patents that you believe Intel hasinfringed;each claim, including the claim number and a brief description of the specific claim language, thatyou believe Intel has infringed;each Intel product that you allege infringes the patents and claims identified in answers #1 and#2;a brief description of the structures or methods within each product identified in answer #3 thatyou allege to be infringing;a brief statement regarding the basis for your belief that the Intel products are infringing, i.e.,describe the documentation or testing that you rely upon as the foundation for your allegations;and,the names of the individuals within DHG and SSG with whom you have already communicatedregarding the technology or the intellectual property rights that are the subject of your allegations,including a copy of the "December 12, 2006 email to DHG and SSG" referenced in your most

recent note.Receipt of this preliminary information will enable Intel to investigate and analyze your claims.Your failure to provide any of the information requested will delay the point at which we caneffectively begin our investigation.

For the immediate future please communicate directly with me rather than with Mr. Otellini or anyother executives within the company. As this matter progresses I may ask you to work with otherlawyers either inside Intel or retained on behalf of Intel.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

Bruce SewellSenior Vice PresidentGeneral CounselIntel Corporation

From: P. Stephen Lamont [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 11:38 AMTo: Arena, Marise GCc: Caroline P. Rogers Esq.; Andrew Dietz; Eliot I. BernsteinSubject: Email to Paul S. OtelliniImportance: High

Dear Mr. Otellini:By way of introduction, I am CEO of Iviewit Holdings, Inc., and its subsidiaries, affiliates, andrelated parties, where we have designed and developed video frame manipulation techniquesand image overlay systems for the encoding, delivery of, and rendering/decoding of, whencombined with other proprietary technologies, DVD quality video across all transmission networksand viewable on all display devices with the value propositions of lower bandwidth, processing,and storage requirements than other solutions than do not utilize Iviewit techniques and systems;Hassan Miah was an early on looker and termed Iviewit solutions "Holy Grail" technologies, and atagline we have used more than once.


31/35

Since October 2006, we have been in touch with Intel's Digital Home Group through the SSGpeople when it became clear that the Intel G695 Express Chipset, and any other chipsetdesigned for the Viiv platform, probably through the chipset functions of, including but not limitedto, Clear Video processing, overlaps our patent pending claims filed in 2000 in rendering fullscreen, full frame rate video encoded by your major motion picture studio partners who, uponinformation and belief, have all adopted Iviewit's patent ending video scaling and image overlaytechniques. Moreover, we have waited patiently for an answer to the implications of myDecember 12, 2006 email to DHG and SSG, specifically advising them that Intel, in the renderingof full screen, full frame rate Iviewit encoded video from your studio partners on including but notlimited to the Viiv platform, is directly infringing on our proprietary rights. Since their answer hasnot been forthcoming in almost 90 days, I can only assume that Intel is continuing to render suchvideo in blatant disregard for Iviewit's patent pending claims and in direct, disregard for Iviewit'sproprietary rights.Moreover, the issue is more serious than outlined above, and as we have discussed that it ismathematically impossible to deliver DVD quality, full screen, full frame rate video, in less thanideal bandwidth, storage, and processing power conditions without overlapping Iviewit'sproprietary rights, and since Iviewit management began discussions with representatives of Real3D, Inc. some years ago we have watched our techniques drive across your product groups,including but not limited to microprocessors and chipsets for home entertainment PCs, andembedded consumer electronics designs such as digital televisions, video recorders, and set-top

boxes. Since Intel acquired the Real 3D business in 1999, pursuant to Iviewit/Real 3D contractsand confidentiality agreements, therefore, Intel has consistently conducted these unauthorizeduses on the aforementioned products, without limitation, learned in prior business discussionswith executed contracts, confidentiality agreements, and such.Of course, it is Iviewit's goal to resolve the situation of the unauthorized use of Iviewit techniquesembodied in prior Iviewit/Real 3D contracts and agreements in the easiest and most seamlessway possible, prior to my shareholders pushing me to an edge I would rather not walk upon atthis time, but will do so if the need be.Please let us know when you are available for a conversation with our Founder, Eliot Bernstein,and myself at your earliest convenience.

Best regards,P. Stephen Lamont

Chief Executive OfficerIviewit Technologies, Inc.39 Little AvenueRed Bluff, Cal. 96080Tel: 914-217-0038Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] URL: www.iviewit.tv THIS MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES INCORPORATED HEREINBY REFERENCE CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PROPRIETARY ANDCONFIDENTIAL,PRIVILEGED INFORMATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM READING, OPENING, PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING,OR SAVING THIS MAIL AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES. PLEASE DELETETHE MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES WITHOUT READING,

OPENING, PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING, OR SAVING THEM, AND NOTIFY THESENDER IMMEDIATELY AT 530.526.5750. IF YOU ARE THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM FORWARDING THEM OR OTHERWISE DISCLOSING THESECONTENTS TO OTHERS, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SENDER.

From: P. Stephen Lamont [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:35 PM


32/35

To: Caroline P. Rogers Esq.; Andrew Dietz

Cc: Eliot I. Bernstein

Subject: Intel Email and Advanced Royalty Agreement -- Comments Requested

Importance: High

David/Raj,

We have waited patiently for an answer to the implications of my December 12, 2006 email,specifically advising you that Intel, in the rendering of full screen, full frame rate Iviewit encodedvideo from your studio partners on including but not limited to the Viiv platform, is directlyinfringing on our proprietary rights. Since your answer has not been forthcoming in more than 60days, I can only assume that you are continuing to render such video in blatant disregard forIviewit's patent pending claims and in direct, disregard for Iviewit's proprietary rights. Therefore,unfortunately, Iviewit must demand that you CEASE AND DESIST rendering such Iviewitencoded scaled video and imaging according to our claims, else we must follow-up on the issuein due course.

Moreover, the issue is more serious than outlined above, and as we have discussed it ismathematically impossible to deliver DVD quality, full screen, full frame rate video, in less thanideal bandwidth, storage, and processing power conditions without overlapping Iviewit's

proprietary rights, and since Iviewit management began discussions with representatives of Real3D, Inc. some years ago we have watched our techniques drive across your product groups,including but not limited to microprocessors and chipsets for home entertainment PCs, andembedded consumer electronics designs such as digital televisions, video recorders, and set-topboxes. Since Intel acquired the Real 3D business in 1999, pursuant to Iviewit/Real 3D contractsand confidentiality agreements, therefore, you must similarly CEASE AND DESIST theseunauthorized uses on the aforementioned products, without limitation, learned in prior businessdiscussions.

Please take notice that this is advise of a future complaint seeking permanent injunction, and thatthe previous offer of license is withdrawn, and is substituted in its entirety by the attachedagreement, executable only for 30 days post hence, else Intel must CEASE AND DESIST the useof rendering full screen, full frame rate video and image overlays where an image can be zoomed

upon and panned without pixelation from Intel products, and please advise if anything will preventyou from accepting our demand, in which case we will file suit shortly thereafter complaining ofbreach of prior confidential disclosures and our attached offer will be deemed withdrawn;certainly, as a public company governed by the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, you haveperfect record keeping of those 1999 discussions and the agreements signed thereunder.

Finally, I await timely execution of the attached and your request of wire transfer instructions,where Iviewit is firmly committed to protecting its proprietary rights against any and all knowingand willful breaches of its confidential disclosures and disregard of recent advise and discussions.

viewit_Intel_Advanced Royalty...

Best regards,

P. Stephen LamontHead BoyHogwarts School of Witchcraft & Wizardry666 Professor Dumbledore LaneSurrey, UK


33/35

Tel: 914-217-0038Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] URL: www.iviewit.tv THIS MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES INCORPORATED HEREINBY REFERENCE CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PROPRIETARY ANDCONFIDENTIAL,PRIVILEGED INFORMATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM READING, OPENING, PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING,OR SAVING THIS MAIL AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES. PLEASE DELETETHE MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES WITHOUT READING,OPENING, PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING, OR SAVING THEM, AND NOTIFY THESENDER IMMEDIATELY AT 530.526.5750. IF YOU ARE THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU

ARE PROHIBITED FROM FORWARDING THEM OR OTHERWISE DISCLOSING THESECONTENTS TO OTHERS, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SENDER.

P. Stephen LamontFrom: P. Stephen Lamont [[email protected]]Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:38 AMTo: Vogel, David; Kapur, Rajeev

Cc: Katsohirakis, Kostas; Law, David SSubject: RE: Answers to Your QuestionsSensitivity: ConfidentialDave,Thanks for your timely update, and it is much appreciated. Moreover, what we have generallydiscussed up until now consists of: what Iviewit is, what Iviewit does, who benefits and at whatmagnitudes, and what is the end result.Furthermore, when one would scratch the surface of this discussion, what shows through wouldbe the fact that from 2000 to 2001, Iviewit was introduced, presented to, and signed NDA's withsix out of the seven of the major studios (Disney was the exception). Following along, again withthe exception of Disney, all the studio executives, technical and non-technical, marveled at whatthe Iviewit techniques did to the encoding solutions of their raw video and began to useIviewit techniques (evidenced by a Warner Bros email offered post NDA); other prospective

partners began to use it as well (did you ever wonder why the free download of Windows MediaEncoder defaults to a 320x240 frame size, the first essential characteristic of the Iviewittechniques?). Therefore, upon information and belief, I submit that what you areseeing from your studio partners (Iviewit's prospective partners under NDA) is video encodedaccording to the Iviewit techniques.So, where does that leave us as prospective partners? Secondly, and I am trying to choose mywords very carefully at this point in respect of what has been and will continue to be a muchappreciated, collegial discussion especially when my acquaintance with Raj and Kostas is takeninto account, it is that any issued patent or patent application for enabling, backbone technologysuch as Iviewit's contains claims on all ends. More specifically, once Iviewit files "Petitions toMake Special" (as a result of the aforementioned unauthorized uses) those continued patentapplications are going to include claims to scaled video on the content creation side(studios/others), claims to scaled video on the transmission of such (pick a transmission network),and claims to scaled video on the client side (pick a device) that scales the video back tofull screen; for a small sum, Iviewit has the power to file these petitions, with the cost of only 100or so man hours, in an instant.Third, I have petitioned our board that issued patents are only as good as the resources in placeto defend, and that is where a big device partner comes into play. As a result, the offer I began toextend in my initial October 29 email consists of a partner to license and assist in the defense ofenabling, backbone entertainment technology in the digital home. In return, what Iviewit has tooffer is an MFN license, a share of past and future recovered royalties, a piece of Iviewit equity,and, perhaps, an option to buy the Iviewit IP. In the case of the Digital Home Group, if thediscussion followed along these lines from MFN to shared royalties to Iviewit equity to ownership


34/35

of the Iviewit IP, then the guessing game is over for what platform is going to dominate the futuredigital home, a very good case, if not a definite bet, would be made for an Iviewit enabled Viivplatform whether it is embedded in a PC or a STB or a DTV -- "ensur[ing] a quality end-to-endexperience for the consumer" to the exclusion of all others. Respectfully, I would also submit thatthis partnership will take a big step towards quelling the critics and nay Sayers comments whoclamor for a more proprietary Viiv platform; including an Iviewit enabled proprietary Intel codecinto the equation some years out might be second step in any MOU.Fourth, in light of the upcoming holiday season, I can hold the exclusive offer open up to andincluding January 15, and I think a good starting place would be comments on the AdvancedRoyalty Agreement attached to my November 27 email; you have excellent references in place inHassan Miah, Gregory Thagard, and Gerald Stanley, and post NDA I can introduce Eliot I.Bernstein, Iviewit's Founder and Principal Inventor.Lastly, I have appreciated and will continue to appreciate the collegial, supportive discussion thathas taken place, and the fact that any platform or device that renders scaled video back to fullscreen is overlapping Iviewit's claims will be placed on the back burner, and I would look forwardto keeping all our eyes on the prize: 105 million U.S. households!Best regards,P. Stephen LamontChief Executive OfficerIviewit Technologies, Inc.

From: P. Stephen Lamont [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 4:08 PMTo: Eliot BernsteinCc: 'Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esq.'; 'Andy Dietz'Subject: RE: INTEL IMPLICATED IN BABY'S BRAIN DAMAGE & MURDER PLOT

Sensitivity: Confidential

Again, I am so, so sorry to hear this...we'll be here for you should you need emotional support,you did a hell of a job for me.

Best regards,

P. Stephen LamontHead Boy -- Hogwarts School of Witchcraft & WizardryTel: 914-217-0038Email: [email protected]; pstephenlamont@mycingu lar.blackberry.netURL: www.iviewit.tv

-----Original Message-----From: Eliot Bernstein [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 4:03 PMTo: [email protected]

Cc: 'Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esq.'; 'Andy Dietz'Subject: RE: INTEL IMPLICATED IN BABY'S BRAIN DAMAGE & MURDER PLOTImportance: High

Sensitivity: Confidential

greatly appreciated but it is not your problem and those that have caused it either way will have topay, one way or another. as the next steps to really test out danny they are not things we will


35/35

subject him too at the moment until further signs are present as they are painful and complicatedlung tests, etc.

Respectfully yours,

Eliot I. BernsteinInventorE [email protected] V (530) 526-5750F (530) 529-4110Iviewit Technologies, Inc.Iviewit Holdings, Inc.39 Little AveRed Bluff, California 96080-3519http://www.iviewit.tv

THIS MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED FILES INCORPORATED HEREIN MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT ISPROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL PRIVILEGED INFORMATION OF iviewit holdings, inc. and its subsidiaries. IF YOU ARE NOTTHE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM OPENING, PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING, OR SAVING THIS

MAIL AND ITS ATTACHMENTS. PLEASE DELETE THE MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED FILES WITHOUT OPENING,

PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING, OR SAVING THEM, AND NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY AT 530-526-5750. IFYOU ARE THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM FORWARDING THEM OR OTHERWISE DISCLOSING

THESE CONTENTS TO OTHERS, UNLESS EXPRESSLY DESIGNATED BY THE SENDER. THANK YOU!

From: P. Stephen Lamont [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 8:44 AMTo: Eliot Bernstein

Subject: RE: INTEL IMPLICATED IN BABY'S BRAIN DAMAGE & MURDER PLOTSensitivity: Confidential

I am so, so sorry to hear that. If I can be of any help with medical referrals, please feel free to callon me. As a starter, Dr. Young at Johns Hopkins Medical Center is the best neurosurgeon in theworld, and I may be able to move a new patient up on his schedule through my neurosciencecontacts there.

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont

Head Boy -- Hogwarts School of Witchcraft & WizardryTel: 914-217-0038Email: [email protected]; pstephenlamont@mycingu lar.blackberry.netURL: www.iviewit.tv

March 25, 2009 Iviewit Intel Corporation SEC Complaint Regarding Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel...

Documents

Transcript of March 25, 2009 Iviewit Intel Corporation SEC Complaint Regarding Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel...