MANAGING TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY IN CHINA
description
Transcript of MANAGING TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY IN CHINA
Globelics Academy 2007
EVIDENCE FROM THE SOLAR
PHOTOVOLTAIC INDUSTRY
MANAGING TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOR RENEWABLE
ENERGY IN CHINA
Nicoletta MarigoCentre for Environmental Policy - Imperial College, [email protected]
OUTLINE
Objectives: what is this study about?
Gaps and relevance: why is this study potentially interesting?
Practical implications/challenges
Methodology and analytical framework
Preliminary results
WHAT IS THIS STUDY ABOUT? (Objectives and questions)
An empirical investigation of if, to what extent and how Chinese firms involved in one renewable energy (RE) technology: solar photovoltaic (PV), build up technological capabilities (TC): only TC necessary to adopt and assimilate externally developed technology or something more?
CAN THEY INNOVATE?
How advanced are the TC the Chinese PV industry is building up?
Have these TC been evolving through time and how?
What is driving the industry to develop and improve its TC?
What potential does China have to compete at the forefront of
innovation with the main international players?
WHY IS THIS POTENTIALLY INTERESTING? (gaps in the literature + overall relevance)
Developing countries (Dcs) as end-user rather than producers of technology: do we know enough about “indigenous technological effort”?
TC literature tend to focus on traditional industries (REF): opportunity to study TC in a high-tech new wave technology (Mytelka 2004) non traditional industry
RE specific IS literature exists but applied to EU only (Jacobsson et al., 2002; Jacobsson and Johnson, 2000; Foxon et al. 2005): anything different in DCs?
Indicators: do trade data + input/output measures offer a robust enough view of innovation in firms?
Conventional wisdom: China’s high-tech production is not very high-tech nor very Chinese! (Rosen, 2003; Steinfeld 2004)
PV needs innovation to drive down costs: what contribution from China? Market diffusion, cheaper technology thanks to cheap labour, more?
SOME PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
• Technology specific study: PV technology knowledge
• Measurement/study of: (a) the TC complexity (b) determinants of TC both with reference to PV
• Development of a customised questionnaire
• Collection of data at the firm + national level
• Identification of firms and actors + mapping of the IS for PV
SOLAR PV PRODUCTION CHAIN
PV is an high-tech industry with labour intensive steps along the production line
Modules
Feedstock
Wafers
PV productsPV systems
Cells
Technology intensive
Labour intensive
Focus of the analysis
COMMERCIAL MATURITY OF PV TECHNOLOGIES RELATIVE TO MARKET PENETRATION
R&D Pre-commercial Fully commercialDemonstration Supported commercial
Technology maturity by “stage”
Market penetration(indicative)
Thin-film amorphous
Conventional Mono-Si
and poly-Si
Thin-film CIS
Thin-film CdTe
High efficiency cells under concentration
Organic PV
93% of market share
METHODOLOGY
Analytical framework
Empirical analysis
Literature review IS for RES (Jacobsson and Johnson 2000; Foxon, et
al. 2005; Christiansen and Buen, 2002)
TC in firms in DCs (Lall, 1992; Romijn, 1999; Bell and Pavitt, 1995; Forbes and Wield, 2002)
In-depth interviews with key PV experts in Europe
Questionnaire survey (firm) Fieldwork in China to interview a sample of PV
wafer, cells & module producers
Semi-structured interviews (national) Chinese PV R&D representatives, policy
makers, NGOs, international organisations promoting PV in China (GEF, UNDP, WB, IT power, GTZ5; Forbes and Wield, 2002)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
The whole PV production chain, from the most technological-intensive activities (i.e. wafer production) to the least (i.e. module assembly and system installation) is present in China
Manufacturers are planning to expand their business to the most high-tech activities of the value chain
All firms have progressed well beyond basic operational capabilities
All firms perform in-house R&D, ~ 5-10% of total annual turnover is for R&D
Some firms have design capabilities & have patented their innovations
TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES
Company In-house
R&D Collaborative
R&D R&D expenditure (% of tot turnover)
Personnel in R&D (% of tot labour force)
Own patents
Licensing own patents
A 10-15% 10% B More than 50% 40% C 10% ?? ?? D 10% 6% E 5% 6-7 people ?? ?? F 3-5% 15% G less than 10% 3% ?? H ?? 6% ?? ??
PRELIMINARY RESULTS (2)
Well consolidated domestic tradition of experimenting with (early ‘60) and producing (early ‘70s), even on a small scale, silicon solar cells
and modules.
New entrepreneurs (early ‘00s): strong R&D background + higher education abroad (in some cases) + can count on existing local expertise.
Knowledge is created primarily through in-house activities by companies at all levels on the production line. In-house R&D plays a strategic role in enhancing firms’ TC and competitiveness.
R&D in several universities and national research institutes but mainly in conventional silicon technologies.
KNOWLEDGE BASE
PRELIMINARY RESULTS (3) ACTORS, IS AND INTERACTIONS
Adapted from: ICEPT and E4Tech, 2003
PV process equipment (predominantly international)
Project developers & installers
Universities
NDRC
Wafer/Cell/module developers
CREIA
REDP(GEF/World Bank/NDRC)
Provincial institutions
local agenciesto develop and implement a training programs
GTZMunicipalities
International on-grid markets (80% of Chinese production is exported)
Domestic off-grid rural market
Niche application markets
Research institutes/Chinese academy of science
Other countries’ governments
Facilitation
Innovators
Demand
Policy support
Influence
Knowledge
Funding
ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK
TC complexity
Internal External PV specific Educational/professional
background of manager
Nature of ownership
Firm size
Skill of workforce
Technological effort• R&D expenditure• Acquired licences• Learning by operating• Staff training• Acquisition of external
expertise• Search for new tech.
knowledge outside firm
Interactions with other agents
• Customers• Suppliers• Training institutions• R&D institutions• Industry associations• Intern. Org. for TC building
Proximity advantage
Institutional support (innovation specific)
Institutional support (PV specific policies for mkt development)
Strategies for cost reduction
• Increase efficiency• Material saving innovation• New non-Si PV tech.
Det
erm
inan
ts
- General economic climate- Degree of competition- Market structure- Government policies for foreign trade, fiscal and monetary measures- Government investment in R&D- Government expenditure on technical education
Romijn and Albaladejo, 2000
STUDY OF TECHNOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY
Process engineering Product engineering
Ba
sic Simple routine (Experience
based)
Debugging, balancing, quality control preventive maintenance,
assimilation of process technology
Assimilation of product design, minor adaptation to
market needs
Inte
rme
dia
te
Adaptive Duplicative (Search based)
Equipment stretching, process adaptation and cost saving,
licensing new technology
Product quality improvement, licensing and assimilating new imported product technology
Ad
van
ced
Innovative Risky (Research based)
In-house process innovation, basic research
In-house product innovation, basic research
De
gre
e o
f c
om
ple
xit
y
Lall's framework
FunctionsProduction
COLUMNS: represent firm-level TC by functionsROWS: represent firm-level TC by level of difficulty
Made specific for PV
Lall, 1992
QUESTIONNAIRE’S STRUCTURE
Entrepreneurial history
General Info about the company
Process
Product manufacturing
R&D Competition
Government support
Inputs to technological development
Relations with suppliersRelations with customers
Relations with universities (Cooperative R&D)
Obstacles and view for future development
Manpower skill Export and prices
INNOVATION CAPABILITIES: A DEFINITION AND NOTIONS
The ability to make substantial improvements and modification to existing technologies and even to generate completely new production process and products
““ ““
(Romijn and Albaladejo 2000; Mani 2003)
Two notions of innovation (Romijn 2002):(a) Effort to advance the technological frontier(b) Efforts to catch up or crawl along at some considerable distance
Skills required for (b) are generally less demanding then those required for (a)
Implications for the study of TC
AN INNOVATION SYSTEM APPROACH
system failures that constrain the RE sources' path can be identified and policies to allow the correct functioning of the
system can hopefully be identified.
Innovation as both an individual (at the firm level) and a collective act. Its success depends on the quality and correct functioning of the
whole system
Productive process
No.firms surveyed
Tot no. firms in productive
process (2004/early 2005)
% of population surveyed relative to Tot
no. of firms in that productive process
Tot. production capacity for productive process, MWp (2004/early 2005)
Significance of firms surveyed in terms of production capacity
(%) Wafer 3 7 42.9 71.5 12.6 Cell 5 7 71.4 199 94.0 Module 7 22 31.8 255 76.9
Population surveyed relative to total firms operating in that specific productive process and their significance in terms of production capacity
0
250
500
750
10001250
1500
1750
2000
2250
Feedstock Wafer Cells Modules
MW
p
2004
2005
2008
Fig. 1 China's PV production capacity along the manufacturing chain in2004, 2005 and 2008
425 MWp: EU cell productioncapacity in 2004
Source: compiled from data obtained from author’s interviews in China, May-July 2005. Data for EU capacity obtained from www.iea-pvps.orgNote 1: feedstock production capacity has been calculated assuming that 11 ton/MWp will be needed by 2008Note 2: the estimate for module production capacity was done by assuming the same rate of growth as solar cells between 2005 and 2008
Beijing
Nigbo
Suzhou
Shanghai
Wuxi
Baoding
Beijing
Nigbo
Suzhou
Shanghai
Wuxi
Baoding
FIELDWORK LOCATIONS
PHOTOVOLTAIC: WHAT IS IT?
Solar cell, or photovoltaic (PV) cell, is a semiconductor device, which, in the presence of sunlight is capable of generating usable electrical energy
Solar cells have many applications. Well suited to power remote areas where there is no electricity grid. Used also in Earth orbiting satellites, handheld calculators, remote radiotelephones, water pumping applications, etc. Solar cells (in the form of modules or solar panels) are appearing on building roofs
where they are connected through an inverter to the electricity grid Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photovoltaic#Manufacture_and_devices
Operation of a basic PV cell
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/solarcells.htm
DETAIL OF S&E DEGREES
ALL 1st UNIV.
DEGREES TOTAL S&E DEGREES
% OF S&E DEGREES ON TOT 1st UNIV.
DEGREES Natural
sciences
Social & behavioural
sciences Engineering
Total, all regions
6,781,885 2,649,460 39 917,721 872,629 868,340
Brazil 245,401 78,049 32 32,556 27,421 18,072
China 440,935 322,769 73 59,804 67,611 195,354
EU 1,908,967 439,171 23 182,089 122,390 134,692
Hong Kong 11,362 5,425 48 2,370 1,233 1,822
India 750,000 176,036 23 147,036 NA 29,000
Japan 532,436 350,535 66 32,718 214,377 103,440
Malaysia 10,511 4,760 45 1,685 2,198 877
South Korea 204,390 91,296 45 29,527 16,624 45,145
Taiwan 87,421 34,722 40 12,911 5,173 16,638
United States 1,199,579 384,674 32 144,441 185,263 60,914
RATIO OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING DEGREES IN SELECTED COUNTRIES, 2002
So
ur c
e:
Na
tion
al S
c ie
nce
Bo
ard
(2
00
2)
In China S&E degrees represent 73% of total first university degrees
DOCTORAL S&E DEGREES EARNED BY CHINESE STUDENTS AT HOME AND USA UNIVERSITIES, 1987-1999
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Nu
mb
er o
f d
egre
es
Within Chinese universities
Within U. S universities
Growing capacity for advanced S&E education: more
students prefer to take PhD in China
Decline of foreign scientists in the United States might well accelerate: "… applications from foreign graduate students to research universities [in the USA] are down by a quarter […] partly because of the federal government's tightening of visas after the 2001 terrorist attacks" (New York Time, 2004).
So
urc
e:
Na
tion
al S
cie
nce
Bo
ard
(2
00
2)
R&D EXPENDITURE AND INTENSITY (R&D EXPENDITURE AS % OF GDP)
Worrying trends in R&D investment and innovation in Europe: growth rate of R&D intensity has been declining since 2000 and is now close to zero. Europe is on track to miss the objective it set itself to boost spending on R&D from 1,9
to 3% by 2010.
China’s R&D intensity (1.31% of GDP in 2003), grew at about 10% per China’s R&D intensity (1.31% of GDP in 2003), grew at about 10% per year between 1997 and 2002year between 1997 and 2002.. If these trends in the EU and China continue, China will be spending the same amount of GDP on research as the EU in 2010 – about 2.2%.
Europe is becoming a less attractive place to carry out research: US investment has been growing at a much greater rate in areas outside the EU –
about 8% per year in the EU and 25% per year in China.
http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/05/968&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
HYPOTHESIS AND EXPECTATIONS
[1][1] If China’s high-tech exports is dominated by parts and accessories for finished PV products
China will be present in module assembly and solar PV installation only
[2][2] If Chinese companies remain incapable of serious high-tech production without a foreigner partner
There probably will be a number of joint venture to allow Chinese
companies to acquire the necessary technology
[3][3] If China is strong in parts and accessories for finished products
There will be mainly basic capability to do limited product and process modification,
[4][4] If China comparative advantage is on cheap labour activities
Competition will be on the basis of heavy discounting
FINDINGS FROM INTERVIEWS WITH CHINESE PV FIRMS (May-July 2005) (1)
The whole PV production chain, from the most technological-intensive activities (i.e. wafer production) to the least (i.e. module assembly and system installation) is present in China. However the industry is currently un-balanced and production capacity is mainly concentrated in module production.
Figure 2, China's PV production chain (2004)
64 MWp
120 MWp
15 MWp5 MWp
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Feedstock Wafers Cells Modules
Ca
pa
cit
y (
MW
p)
Source: personal communication, Wang Sicheng, Beijing Jike Energy New Tech. Dev. Co., 29 May 2005.
Figure 2, China's PV production chain (2004)
64 MWp
120 MWp
15 MWp5 MWp
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Feedstock Wafers Cells Modules
Ca
pa
cit
y (
MW
p)
Source: personal communication, Wang Sicheng, Beijing Jike Energy New Tech. Dev. Co., 29 May 2005.
FINDINGS FROM INTERVIEWS WITH CHINESE PV FIRMS (May-July 2005) (2)
However, if you ask to the companies producing modules and cells what is the importance they attach to the other activities along the production chain in terms of future investment, the answer is:
cells, wafers and, in two cases, feedstock production (i.e. to the most technology intensive activities of the solar industry supply chain
Figure 1, China's PV cell current and expected production capacity
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
MW
p
Japan's production capacity (2004)
Germany's production capacity (2004)
Source: own data collected during fieldwork in China (May-July 2005)
Figure 1, China's PV cell current and expected production capacity
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
MW
p
Japan's production capacity (2004)
Germany's production capacity (2004)
Source: own data collected during fieldwork in China (May-July 2005)
FINDINGS FROM INTERVIEWS WITH CHINESE PV FIRMS (May-July 2005) (3)
All the sampled firms have progressed well beyond basic operational capabilities and are strengthening their in-house R&D effort.
Some are able to design key equipment in the production line to meet their own production and product requirements.
All are able to customise products to meet the particular needs of export markets (on average 70-80% of domestic production is exported) and are successfully improving product quality by increasing solar cell efficiency and obtaining international manufacturing and product performance certifications.
There are no joint venture. There used to be 2, but since 2003 the companies are entirely domestic.
All are planning to expand their business to the most technology intensive activities of the solar industry supply chain (i.e. wafer and cell production).
These findings seem not to confirm prevailing widely-held assumptions that firms in China are concentrated primarily in low-end commodity manufacturing and tend to compete on the basis of heavy discounts because they are advantaged by an immense pool of cheap labour. Furthermore the evidence seems not to confirm the common view that developing countries are not associated with the dynamic use of technology because of the high risks involved or because they continue to employ and reproduce technologies that are generated elsewhere.
FINDINGS FROM INTERVIEWS WITH CHINESE PV FIRMS (May-July 2005) (4)
WHAT CHINA ALREADY DID FOR US
16th century1151Explosive
11901050Compass
(Gutenberg's Bible) 1456868Printed book
1709851Porcelain
1150105Paper
582 A.D.1300 B.C. Silk
Europe/AmericaChina
China’s technological contribution to the West
CHINA’S R&D SPENDING
http://www.reed-electronics.com/eb-mag/article/CA610433?pubdate=7%2F1%2F2005#It's%20the%20incentives
Chinese Yuan were converted at the official Bank of China exchange rate, 8.28 Yuan per US dollar
Source: Ministry of science and technology, People’s Republic of China
LEADERS POTENTIAL LEADERS
DYNAMIC ADOPTERS MARGINALISED
Rank Country Rank Country Rank Country Rank Country
1 Finland (2 hubs) 20 Italy 39 South Africa (1 hub) 64 Nicaragua
2 USA (13 hubs) 24 Hong Kong 40 Thailand 65 Pakistan
4 Japan (2 hubs) 27 Portugal 43 Brazil (2 hubs) 68 Kenya
5 S. Korea (1 hub) 29 Poland 45 China (3 hubs) 70 Tanzania
7 UK (4 hubs) 30 Malaysia 51 Tunisia (1 hub) 71 Sudan
11 Germany (3 hubs) 37 Chile 63 India (1 hub) 72 Mozambique
The technology achievement index introduced by the UN aims to capture how well a country is creating and diffusing technology and building a human skill base
THE UNDP’S TECHNOLOGICAL ACHIEVEMNT INDEX
Developing countries, like China, India, Thailand and Brazil are considered dynamic adopters of technology
Source: UN Human Development Report 2001
R&D INTENSITY IN THE EU, CHINA, JAPAN AND USA IN 2003
htt
p:/
/ep
p.e
uro
sta
t.c
ec
.eu
.in
t/c
ac
he
/IT
Y_
OF
FP
UB
/KS
-NS
-05
-00
2/E
N/K
S-N
S-0
5-
00
2-E
N.P
DF