Localization and Assessment of Epileptic Foci A new method using Wavelet Packets
description
Transcript of Localization and Assessment of Epileptic Foci A new method using Wavelet Packets
Localization and Assessment of Epileptic FociA new method using Wavelet Packets
With
Itai Doron, Eden Rephaeli (TAU)
Oren Sagher – Dep. Of Neurosurgery, Univ. of Michigan Health System Leo V. Towle – Dep. Of Neurology, Univ. of Chicago Hospitals
Eshel Ben-Jacob (TAU)
Tomer Gazit (BIU & TAU)
Epilepsy Workshop, Michigan, May 9
Outline
• Introduction – the localization problem
• The method • Results
• New insights and conclusions
Voltage
Time
Invasive Recordings - Subdural EEG (ECoG)Invasive Recordings - Subdural EEG (ECoG)
1-3 weeks recordings
Invasive Recordings – Depth ElectrodesInvasive Recordings – Depth Electrodes
1-3 weeks recordings
The Challenge:The Challenge:
Inter-ictal
(before the seizure)
Onset
Ictal
(The seizure)
Localization and assessment of the Epileptic foci
Delta: <3.5 Hz
Theta: 3.5-7 Hz
Alpha: 7-13 Hz
Beta: 13-30 Hz
Gamma: >30 Hz
The Classical Frequency Bands
The Big Picture
Fre
qu
en
cy
0 HZ
42 HZ
Similarity
In all successful surgeries, the method detected the correct foci
Time-Frequency Analysis – Some Math
The Fourier Transform
Time basis Frequency basis
Time Frequency
Voltage Power
Time
Fre
que
ncy
Signal
Time-Frequency
plane
Beyond Fourier Transform
Time-Frequency Analysis
Wavelets
A “mother wavelet”is a function located in time and frequency.
The Mexican Hat
s
ut
ssu 1),(
The function is dilated and time-shifted to form a set of basis functions:
The Coiflet
Binary tree Wavelet basis
The Wavelet Transform
70
31
32
11
12
13
4
98
234567
(70)36
(31)23
(32)13
11
12
(13)9
4
9
8
2
3
4
5
6
7
Wavelet Packet DecompositionMaximum Information
Best Basis
“Shannon Information” Like
Doron et al. Time-Invariant Person Specific Frequency Templates in Human Brain Activity,PRL. 96 (2006)
3/16 1/16 2/16 4/16
Quantifying the Similarity
ji
ji ji
ji
nnn nn
nnW
PP
PPjiS
,),max(
),min(),(
Wn
n
n
nn MMP
Inter-Ictal Analysis: Similarity Matrices
3224544748 6 884072 8 463856556461607674777578737969685958525143455057444933667034424153261827282011 3 12 1 9 22 2 21193536 4 8314 7 8425178237 5 71868562801310672963153981873123306516
32245447486
8840728
4638565564616076747775787379696859585251434550574449336670344241532618272820113
1219
222
211935364
83147
84251782375
71868562801310672963153981873123306516
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
746879818017677569636261937165594645537770383224233022142131158629434136555456 6 7 13571944 5 202835338547 8 891287494034768452481688 2 501166907891 3 1826 1 6092272510 9 7358835139 4 7264378242
74687981801767756963626193716559464553777038322423302214213115862943413655545667
135719445
2028353385478
8912874940347684524816882
5011669078913
18261
60922725109
73588351394
7264378242
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Type I
Type II
Type I
Type II
80
100
120
140
160
18040 60
80 100 120 140 160
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
G3
G4
G10
G11
G5
G12
G6
G15
G16
G13
G17
G22
G7
G23
G18
G29
G24
G14
G19
G30
G25
G31
G20
G26
G32
G21
G27
G33
G28
G34
L1
R1
G35
L2
L3
R2
L4
R3
L5
R4
L6
R5
L7
L8
R6R7
R8
Type I - Comparison
Failed – the focus could not be removed
G5
G4
G6
G3
G7
G14
G2
G13
G8
G12
G15
G1
G11
G16
G10
G20
G22
G21
G9
G19
G18
G17
G23
G24
G27
G28
G29
G30
G26
G25
G31
G32
G37
G36
G35
G38
G34
G33
G39
G40
G44
G43
G45
G42
G46
G41
G47
G48
G51
G52
G53
G54
G50
G49
G55
G56
G61
G59
G60
G58
G57
G62
G63
G64
Type II- Comparison
6
8
10
12
14
161011
1213
1415
1617
185
10
15
20
25
PG 64
PG 63PG 56
PG 62PG 55
PG 61PG 54
PG 48
PG 60
PG 47
PG 53
LT 8
PG 46
LT 7
PG 40
PG 59PG 52
PG 45
PG 39
LT 6
PG 38
PG 58
PG 32
PG 51PG 44
PG 31
PG 37
LT 5
AST 8
PG 50
PG 24
PG 43
PG 30
PG 57
PG 36
PG 23
PG 29
AST 7
PG 42PG 49
LT 4
PG 22
PG 35
PG 16
PG 28
PG 15
PG 41
PG 21
PG 34
PG 8
AST 6
PG 27
PG 14
PG 20
PG 7
LT 3
PG 33
PG 13
PG 26
PST 4
PG 19
PG 6
PG 12
PG 25
AST 5
LT 2
PG 5
PG 18PG 11
AST 4
LT 1
PG 4
PST 3
PG 17PG 10
PG 3
AST 3RD 4
AST 1AST 2
PG 9PG 2
PST 2
RD 3
RD 2
PG 1
RD 1
PST 1
LD 4
LD 3
LD 2
LD 1
140
150
160
170
18060
80
100
120
140
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
8
16
7
24
6
32
15
40
48
23
5
14
31
39
4
47
22
13
3
30
38
21
46
12
2
11
29
20
45
37
1
19
10
28
36
44
9
27
18
35
43
26
17
34
42
25
33
41
Partially successful
SuccessfulPartially successful
Failed
LT8
RT8
LT7
RT7
LT6
RT6
LT5
RT5
LT4
RT4
LT3
RT3
LT2
RT2
LI6LI5LA6
LT1
LI4
RT1
LI3
LA5
RA6
RI5
RI6
LI2
RI4
RA5
LA4
RI3
RI2
RI1
LA3
LI1
RA4
LA2
RA3
LA1
RA2
RA1
Results - 11 Patients
Type I Type II
7 Patients 4 Patients
6 successful surgeries
1 Failed (Focus could not be removed)
1 successful surgery
3 Non-successful
In all the successful surgeries the resected zones matched the predicted foci
In all the non-successful surgeries One (or more) predicted focus was not resected
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
46
810
1214
1618
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8PT 9
PT 1PT 10
PT 17
PT 18
PT 2
PT 19
PT 25
PT 11
PT 27
PT 33
PT 26
PT 34
PT 35
PT 3
PT 42
PT 28
PT 43
PT 36
PT 41
PT 12
PT 20
PT 44
PT 4
PT 37
PT 29
PT 45
PT 21
PT 13
PT 5
PT 46
PT 38
PT 30
PT 22
PT 14
PT 6
PT 47
PT 39
PT 31
PT 23
PT 15
PT 48
PT 7
PT 40
PT 32
PT 24
ST 7
PT 16
ST 8
ST 6
PT 8
ST 5
AT 8
ST 4
SF 64
ST 3
SF 56
AT 7
ST 2
SF 63
SF 55
AT 6
ST 1AT 1
SF 62
SF 54
AT 5
AT 2AT 3
SF 53
SF 61
AT 4
SF 52
SF 60
SF 51
SF 59
SF 50
SF 58
SF 49SF 57
Type I
Type II
Looking Ahead
Early Warning Epilepsy Pace-Maker
The Iron Age
The patient survived the surgery
The Middle Ages
Can we do better?
Scalp EEG
Dynamics of Multiple Foci – For type II
Summary
New methods for: Localization and Assessments of Epileptic Foci
3. New insights
2. Satisfying agreement with surgery results
1. Identification of two Types of Seizure Dynamics
We do not seek:The “world best method”
and not to replace the Epileptologists
We hope that one day The methods will be used for diagnostics
Thank you