Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Solar array design Life in the...

22
Carnegie Mellon Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Solar array design Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 J. Teza Carnegie Mellon University

Transcript of Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Solar array design Life in the...

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar array design

Life in the Atacama Design ReviewDecember 19, 2003

J. TezaCarnegie Mellon University

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar Panel - requirements

Provide energy through day of mission (full sun) plus charge battery for night operation

Light weight

Robust

Low wind profile

Easily removable

Transportation, safety, access

Minimum shadowing

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar Panel - design

Emcore ATJ cells Efficiency > 23%

Panel area: less than 2.5 m2 ModularEase of assembly / disassemblySimplify design and fabricationSpares

Orientation Fixed – simplicity, can’t demonstrate gain of pointed panel offsets complexity and losses of actuationHorizontal – simplicity, symmetry, lower wind profile

Can this design provide sufficient power?

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Simulation

Schedule load over typical mission day

Simulate insolation for location and time

Matlab simulation of sun position, airmass attenuation, integrated over wavelength

Compared insolation against SBDART and Atacama 03 field data (error < 6% for insolation > 300 W/m2)

Model system energy• cell efficiency (empirical)• panel area• MPPT efficiency

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Simulation – activity schedule

Activity

• Components

Power

(W)

Hibernation

• Core CPU 5

Plan

• Hotel 120

Traverse

• Locomotion

• Hotel250

120

Fluorescence

• Locomotion

• Hotel & science

100

120

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Simulation – Atacama – 2 m2 panel

Date: 9/1/04

Date: 9/30/04

Insolation vs. time Panel Power vs. time Battery Energy vs. time

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Simulation – Atacama – 2.5 m2 panel

Date: 9/1/04

Date: 9/30/04

Insolation vs time Panel Power vs time Battery Energy vs time

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Simulation – Atacama - Results

Date Panel area (m2)

Panel energy / day

(Wh)

Margin

(Wh)

9-1 2 2863 69

9-1 2.5 3579 785

9-30 2 3467 673

9-30 2.5 4335 1541

Load energy / day : 2794 Wh

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar panel – configurations

Cells per module 6 x 16 = 96 6 x 16 = 96 8 x 20 = 160

Modules 8 9 6

Panel – total cells 768 864 960

Effective area (m2) 2.04 2.30 2.55

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar panel – design strawman

6 modules

160 cells / module

dimensions: 58 cm x 85 cm

20 cells per string yielding 46 volts at MPP

8 cells parallel yield 2.8 A Isc max at 1000 W/m2

Panel

effective area 2.5 m2

geometric area 2.62 m2

Power from panel • 1000 W/m2 and 23.4% efficiency • 97.5 W / module• 585 W total

Weight estimate: 8 kg total

(including cell encapsulation, lamination and wiring)

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar panel – issues

Schedule

design finalization

diode procurement

fabrication

Spares

Testing

Pittsburgh sun in spring insufficient

Arizona testing before shipment limited

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar – power trackers

PurposeElectrically couple solar array to battery / DC busOperate at or near maximum power point of solar array

VendorsBrusa / Solectria – analog, complex, geared for lead acidAERL – buck converter with temperature dependent model of panel IV characteristic (not a true MPPT), simpleBiel – digital controlled, efficient, solar race technologyOthers – typically not suitable for this application• Consumer; designed for lead acid (Morningstar)

Reliability, do not support Li technologies, not flexible• Industrial; designed for lead acid (Trace)

Over built - do not support Li technologies

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar power point tracker – Biel MPPT

Biel School of Engineering and Science (Switzerland)

NG Maximum Power Point Tracker

Boost converter

Tracks maximum power point

Power capacity 800 W

Can bus interface

Issues – reliability, support, programming

Cost $780

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Action items

Solar array

Finalize design

Procure bypass diodes

Fabrication detailing

Power tracker

Finalize solar panels and power system parameters

Procure

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar power point tracker – Biel MPPT

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar power point tracker – Biel MPPT

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Insolation – Atacama 03 field data

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Insolation – Atacama 03 field data

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Insolation – Atacama 03 field data

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Insolation – Atacama 03 field data - summary

Average available energy per day: 6335 Wh/m2/day

Std dev: 212 Wh/m2/day

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar panel – cell response

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Solar panel – Cells

InGaP/GaAs/Ge cell with Si bypass diode

Cell dimensions: 4 cm x 6.9 cm (nominal)

Cell area, effective : 26.6 cm2

Cell area, geometric: 27.3 cm2