LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

14
LID and Policy: LID and Policy: Sustainable Sustainable Development Practices Development Practices What is Stopping Us? What is Stopping Us? Jon Barsanti Jr Jon Barsanti Jr Masters in City and Regional Planning Masters in City and Regional Planning BA Interdisciplinary Study in Biology and Chemistry BA Interdisciplinary Study in Biology and Chemistry [email protected] [email protected] 919.943.1915 919.943.1915 Who Who Developers Policy Makers Designers Decision Makers (Municipal/County) Why Why Competitive Advantage (Others are not Doing it) It is good for the economy, good for the community, and good for the environment Others are Doing It; Can do It Better Others are doing it and if I/We don’t adopt/adapt I/We will lose out to other communities/developers

description

A look at what and who is holding back LID and LEED developments. Looks at the returns on investments and the benefits to the ecosystem by changing our thinking towards where and how we develop

Transcript of LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

Page 1: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

LID and Policy: LID and Policy:

Sustainable Sustainable

Development PracticesDevelopment Practices

What is Stopping Us?What is Stopping Us?

Jon Barsanti JrJon Barsanti Jr

Masters in City and Regional PlanningMasters in City and Regional Planning

BA Interdisciplinary Study in Biology and ChemistryBA Interdisciplinary Study in Biology and Chemistry

[email protected]@alumni.unc.edu

919.943.1915919.943.1915

WhoWho

Developers

Policy

MakersDesigners

Decision Makers (Municipal/County)

WhyWhy

Competitive Advantage (Others are not Doing it)

It is good for the economy,

good for the community,

and good for the environment

Others are Doing It; Can

do It Better

Others are doing it and if

I/We don’t adopt/adapt I/We will lose out to other

communities/developers

Page 2: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

WhyWhy

NotNot

New Way of Doing Business

Perceived Costs

Elected

Official

Resistance

New Way to Design

New Way of Developing Land/

Approving Plans

LandUse

Transportation WaterQuantity/Water Quality

All Development Occurs in All Development Occurs in

a Watersheda Watershed

All Land Uses have a Water ProfileAll Land Uses have a Water Profile

Undeveloped Land can be valuableUndeveloped Land can be valuable

LID & LEED can improve Water LID & LEED can improve Water

Quality and Quantity; Cost LessQuality and Quantity; Cost Less

Need to view RunNeed to view Run--off as a Resourceoff as a Resource

Page 3: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

All Development Occurs All Development Occurs

in a Watershedin a Watershed

Three Parts:

Watershed Critical Areas

Watershed Protected Areas

Remainder of the Watershed

Barriers:

• “Highest and Best Use of the Land;”

• One person’s/community’s out-flow is another’s intake

Wetlands are more than Wetlands are more than

Undevelopable LandUndevelopable Land

Wetlands are nature’s filtration system

Wetlands manage volume and sediment load

Wetlands are key to wildlife habitat preservation

Barrier: Wetland is undevelopable; Can fill and replace, although manufactured is not as good as natural

Stream Buffers Impact Development Stream Buffers Impact Development

Developments Impact Stream Developments Impact Stream

BuffersBuffers

Stream Buffers protect encroachment on ecosystem by

development

Stream Buffers Protect development from

encroachment by ecosystem (e.g. floods.)

Barriers: Inconsistent setbacks between communities;

Vertical versus Horizontal Setbacks

Page 4: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

All Land Uses have a All Land Uses have a

Pollutant/VolumePollutant/Volume ProfileProfile

From Kimberly Brewer’s Presentation to the TJCOG Smart Growth Committee

ftp://ftp.tjcog.org/pub/tjcog/regplan/smrtgrow/devwq.pdf

Volume of water flow

Nutrients

Temperature of water flowing off the land

Toxins

Bacteria

All Land Uses have a All Land Uses have a

Pollutant/VolumePollutant/Volume ProfileProfile

Data from A Nutrient Credit Trading Framework for the Jordan Lake Watershed: Using Market-Based Mechanisms to Make Watershed Restoration More Cost-Effective

http://www.cfra-nc.org/documents/FinalReport-FullReport_000.pdf

Sources Land-Use Contribution to N Load

Contribution to P Load

Residential (SF) 14%29% 12%

Residential (MF) 1%

Agriculture 20% 36% 51%

Forest 56% 19% 15%

Commercial/ Industrial

3% 9% 6%

Other 6% 7% 16%

http://www.cwp.org/Resource_Library/Center_Docs/PWP/ELC_PWP36.pdf

Soil Compaction Occurs in almost all situations

How much is reversible?

Page 5: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

http://www.cwp.org/Resource_Library/Center_Docs/PWP/ELC_PWP36.pdf2.652.65QuartziteQuartzite

2.22.2Concrete PavementConcrete Pavement

1.6 to 2.11.6 to 2.1ROW and Building Pads ROW and Building Pads

(95% Compaction)(95% Compaction)

1.5 to 1.81.5 to 1.8ROW and Building Pads ROW and Building Pads

(85% Compaction)(85% Compaction)

1.8 to 2.01.8 to 2.0Athletic FieldsAthletic Fields

1.8 to 2.01.8 to 2.0Urban Fill SoilsUrban Fill Soils

1.5 to 2.01.5 to 2.0Crushed Rock Parking LotCrushed Rock Parking Lot

1.5 to 1.91.5 to 1.9Urban LawnsUrban Lawns

1.6 to 2.01.6 to 2.0Glacial TillGlacial Till

1.0 to 1.21.0 to 1.2Organic Silts/ClaysOrganic Silts/Clays

1.2 to 1.51.2 to 1.5Silt LoamsSilt Loams

1.3 to 1.41.3 to 1.4SiltSilt

1.41.4Silty sandsSilty sands

1.1 to 1.31.1 to 1.3Sandy SoilSandy Soil

1.01.0CompostCompost

0.2 to 0.30.2 to 0.3PeatPeat

Surface Bulk Surface Bulk

Density (g/cc)Density (g/cc)Undisturbed Soil Type or Urban Undisturbed Soil Type or Urban

ConditionCondition

Table 1: Comparison of Bulk Density for undisturbed Table 1: Comparison of Bulk Density for undisturbed

Soils and Common Urban Conditions (Compiled from Soils and Common Urban Conditions (Compiled from

various sources)various sources)

Reversing Compacted SoilsReversing Compacted Soils

• Soil Amendments

• Compost Amendments

• Reforestation

• Timehttp://www.cwp.org/Resource_Library/Center_Docs/PWP/ELC_PWP37.pdf

Benefits of Compost Benefits of Compost

AmendmentsAmendments

Compost Amendments Can:

• Increase Porosity

• Reduce Peak Flows

• Produce Thicker lawns

• Reduce Fertilizer Applications and Watering Needs

• Create better lawns, faster

http://www.epa.gov/ednnrmrl/publications/reports/epa600r00016/epa600r00016.pdf EPA/600/R-00/016

Page 6: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

Impacts of Compost Impacts of Compost

AmendmentsAmendmentsCompost Amendments May:

• Increase Concentrations of N and • Decrease Total N & P

• Amendments can be tilled or applied

directly and reseeded.

• 2:1 ratio soil to compost tilled to at least 12 inches

• Construction compaction can reach 24 inches

http://www.epa.gov/ednnrmrl/publications/reports/epa600r00016/epa600r00016.pdf EPA/600/R-00/016

Barriers: It takes time and money to measure predevelopment conditions and

post-development conditions

Cost to amend soil decreases, per lot, as area amended increases

Other perspectives on Other perspectives on

Compost AmendmentsCompost Amendments

LID Can Improve Water LID Can Improve Water

Quality & Water QuantityQuality & Water Quantity

How we develop

Where we develop (and where we do not)

What we do with the Run-off (Pipe or Percolate)

Page 7: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

LID Can Improve Water LID Can Improve Water

Quality & Water QuantityQuality & Water Quantity

http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/water_resource.htm http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/water_density.htm

LID Can Improve Water LID Can Improve Water

Quality & Water QuantityQuality & Water Quantity

http://www.jordancove.uconn.edu/jordan_cove/publications/final_report.pdf

• Impacts on Land Start At the Grading Stage

• Fertilizers can have an impact on water quality, even in LID Neighborhoods

• Volume and Peak Flows were

kept at predevelopment levels.

• Need to Control Compaction,

Minimize Soil Disturbance, and have on-site supervision.

LID Can Improve Water LID Can Improve Water

Quality & Water QuantityQuality & Water Quantity

http://www.nahb.org/fileUpload_details.aspx?contentID=112936

Negatively Impacts water-related

ecosystems

• Impacts water Quality through

• Impervious Surfaces

• Introduction of Contaminants

• Site Location of Development relative to natural features

Page 8: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

LID Can Improve Water LID Can Improve Water

Quality & Water QuantityQuality & Water Quantity

http://www.nahb.org/fileUpload_details.aspx?contentID=112936

National Association of Home-Builders has a large amount of information regarding costs and benefits of Low Impact Development

Perceived Barrier: It costs more and does not provide a benefit to the builder

Actual Barrier: Educating the entire community to the value versus costs of LID (Lower Stormwater Costs, more land can be developed; cost savings to the community, etc.)

LID Can Improve Water LID Can Improve Water

Quality & Water QuantityQuality & Water Quantity

http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/lid/costs07/documents/reducingstormwatercosts.pdf

… (In) the vast majority of cases,significant savings were realized due to:

• reduced costs for site grading and preparation,

• stormwater infrastructure, site paving, and landscaping.

• Total capital cost savings ranged from 15to 80 percent when LID methods were used...

LID Can Improve Water LID Can Improve Water

Quality & Water QuantityQuality & Water Quantity

http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/lid/costs07/documents/reducingstormwatercosts.pdf

Page 9: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

LID Can Improve Water LID Can Improve Water

Quality & Water QuantityQuality & Water Quantity

Managing stormwater in Pierce County: Kensington Estates case study sheds light on low impact development

http://www.djc.com/news/en/11135654.html

• Site Design was 103 Lots on 24 Acres

• Conventional Site Design required 270,000 Cu Ft of

Stormwater Facilities

• LID Required 55,000 cu ft of stormwater facilities

• 62% of land was saved as open space

• Cost Savings of 20% to the Developer

• 10% More units were able to be built than conventional design would have allowed.

LID: How do we define LID: How do we define

conservation/disturbedconservation/disturbed

Type of Residential Type of Residential

DevelopmentDevelopmentDisturbed Disturbed

SpaceSpaceOpen SpaceOpen Space Conserved SpaceConserved Space

Low Density Low Density

(e.g. 1 unit/2a)(e.g. 1 unit/2a)Could be entire Could be entire

sitesiteYes Yes –– may be may be

yardyardNoNo

ClusterCluster Could Be entire Could Be entire

sitesiteFragmentedFragmented NoNo

Open SpaceOpen Space 50% or less50% or less 50% or More50% or More Open Space can Open Space can

be undevelopablebe undevelopable

ConservationConservation Less than 50%Less than 50% More than 50% More than 50% Undevelopable Undevelopable

area excludedarea excluded

Barrier(s): How each is defined varies by community/county

Need to change thinking from Need to change thinking from

stormwater as waste to stormwater as waste to

stormwater as resource.stormwater as resource.

http://waterparadigm.org/indexen.php?web=./home/homeen.html http://www.onthecommons.org/media/pdf/original/OurWaterComonsOctober2008English.pdf

Barrier: Need to change the way we think about water

Page 10: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

Need to change thinking from Need to change thinking from

stormwater as waste to stormwater as waste to

stormwater as resource.stormwater as resource.

http://www.clemson.edu/restoration/events/past_events/sc_water_resources/t4_proceedings_presentations/t4_zip/zimmer.pdf

http://www.coe.neu.edu/environment/DOCUMENTS/Wingspread%20Final%20Report.pdf

Barrier: We cannot solve our problems at the same level of thinking that created them

We need a new way of looking at our water quality and water quantity problems

Need to change from Need to change from

Environment or Economy to Environment or Economy to

Environment & EconomyEnvironment & Economy

http://www.coe.neu.edu/environment/DOCUMENTS/Wingspread%20Final%20Report.pdf

“An urban area is an ecological system wherein humans, habitat,

transportation and water infrastructure, and terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna exist in symbiosis and interdependence.

Urban fresh waters are the lifeline for ecological and economical sustainability, yet the fresh water resources are being impaired to a point

that the integrity of urban waters has been damaged by excessive development and overuse….”

Need to Change thinking from Need to Change thinking from

stormwater as waste to stormwater as waste to

stormwater as resourcestormwater as resource..

http://www.coe.neu.edu/environment/DOCUMENTS/Wingspread%20Final%20Report.pdf

The concept of the Cities of the Future, the fifth paradigm of urbanization… is a paradigm of integration

• Future, and existing, urban developments will accommodate

landscape, drainage, transportation and habitat infrastructure systems

• Cities will be resilient to extremehydrological events and pollution

• There will be an optimal balance between recreation, navigation and other economic uses of water.

Page 11: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

Need to make sure ordinances Need to make sure ordinances

do not prohibit LID AND that do not prohibit LID AND that

they allow LID practices.they allow LID practices.

SESSION LAW 2009-243

HOUSE BILL 749

“…. No State, county, or local building code or regulation shall prohibit the use of cisterns to provide water for flushing toilets and for outdoor irrigation. Asused in this subsection....”

All Development Impacts Water Quality

Highest use versus the best use of the land

Wetlands and stream buffers are undervalued

One community’s outflow is another

community’s intake

Reducing usage of drinking water for irrigation and toilets

Water is Water Water is Water

Paradigm ShiftParadigm Shift

Barriers to Implementing Barriers to Implementing

LEED Across the RegionLEED Across the RegionSimilar to Implementing LID

“Everybody knows….” it costs more.

http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=2908

Page 12: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

Barriers to Implementing Barriers to Implementing

LEED Across the RegionLEED Across the Region•

Sometimes, its is not about the costs (price,)

rather it is really playing up the benefits

http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=2908

Barriers to Implementing Barriers to Implementing

LEED Across the RegionLEED Across the Region

Cost premiums ranging from ZERO% to 6.27%

Energy Savings from

23% to 50%

Water Savings from Zero to 78%

http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=2908

Case Study: Residential Case Study: Residential

DevelopmentDevelopment

http://pdfserve.informaworld.com/316990__914017852.pdf

• 73 Projects

• Range Under 5 Acres to Over

100 Acres

• Utilization of LEED techniques

depend on points awarded and cost to develop

• Gold and Platinum Certified Utilize Green Technologies and Green Construction

• Platinum tend to include

affordable housing and Habitat/wetland restoration

Page 13: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

Photograph: Chuck Burton AP May 5, 2010 News and Observer

Halted construction fills N.C. waterways with silt BY PAGE IVEY - The Associated Press

"When all the plants have grown up, you

don't actually see any of the green plastic. It's just a lush green environment on top of the pond, so in theory there's a habitat for fish, frogs, wildlife as well." Ryan Winston

Our Floating Future?Our Floating Future?• Research by NC State University and Bill Hunt

• Being Tested in City of Durham – Hillendale Golf Course and Museum of Life and Science

• Originated in Montana (2000)

• Costs: $30/sq ft

• Benefit: “natural”removal of Phosphorus and Nitrogen using wetland/bog plants

News and Observer – 4/14/2010

Barriers to Implementing Barriers to Implementing

LID Across the RegionLID Across the Region

Need to look at Decentralized solution for a Decentralized problem

Our ordinances hold us back

“Everybody knows….”

Maintaining it after it is built

Page 14: LID LEED and Policy August 2010 (final) (handouts)

ConclusionConclusionWe have a new resource

We can ‘sing from the same songbook.’

We can customize our solutions to meet the requirements of our

communities and our region.

We can have a Win-Win-Win for the consumer, the developer, and the community.

If we ‘only’ apply to new construction, existing conditions

will ‘only’ not get worse.

Jon Barsanti Jr.Jon Barsanti Jr.

[email protected]@alumni.unc.edu

919.943.1915919.943.1915

Presentation available atPresentation available athttp://www.slideshare.net/JonBarsantiJrhttp://www.slideshare.net/JonBarsantiJr