Liberi v Taitz - Decl of Lisa Liberi Doc 483

8/2/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Decl of Lisa Liberi Doc 483

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/liberi-v-taitz-decl-of-lisa-liberi-doc-483 1/119

Declaration of Lisa Liberi 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Philip J. Berg, EsquirePennsylvania I.D. 9867LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Telephone: (610) 825-3134E-mail: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LISA LIBERI, et al

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ORLY TAITZ, et al,

Defendants.

:::

:::::::::::::

:

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER:

8:11-cv-00485-AG (AJW)

DECLARATION OF LISA LIBERI

Date of Hearing: April 23, 2012Time of Hearing: 10:00 a.m.Location: Courtroom 10D

Declaration of Lisa Liberi

I, Lisa Liberi am over the age of 18 and am a party to the within action. I

have personal knowledge of the facts herein, and if called to do, I could and would

competently testify. I am making this Declaration under the penalty of perjury of

the Laws of the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746.

1. In or about November 2008, Orly Taitz began calling Mr. Berg’s

office. Mr. Berg asked that I return her call, which I did. Orly Taitz was seeking

assistance with the filing of a U.S. Supreme Court Writ of Cert for a case that was

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 483 Filed 03/22/12 of 117 Page ID#:11792




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

never properly filed in a Trial Court. I declined any assistance to Orly Taitz and

her legal endeavors. Orly Taitz wanted Mr. Berg to sponsor her in the U.S

Supreme Court, and stated attorney’s lie regarding the length of time they had

known each other all the time. Mr. Berg declined Orly Taitz’s requests.

2. I never met or talked with Neil Sankey, Todd Sankey, Sankey

Investigations, Inc. or the Sankey Firm, Inc., nor had I ever heard of them prior to

the events leading up to the within lawsuit. The Sankey Firm and Todd Sankey

allowed Neil Sankey to harm me and my family and cause these serious damages

by allowing Neil Sankey to utilize Todd Sankey and the Sankey Firm, Inc.’s log-in

credentials to Accurint, LexisNexis, Choicepoint and their other data broker

accounts and portray himself as a Private Investigator with the Sankey Firm. My

husband and I cannot fix the damages caused by the Sankey Firm owned and

operated by Todd Sankey.

3. Shortly after Mr. Berg and I declined assistance to Orly Taitz, Orly

Taitz used the power of the Internet stating she was going to take Mr. Berg down

and to do so she was going to destroy and get rid of me. Orly Taitz has admitted

this in Court filings; see DN’s 190-3, p. 20 through 190-25, pp. 896-985 and DN

190-27, p. 1043.





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. Orly Taitz through Neil Sankey and the Sankey Firm, Inc. began

putting out a “supposed” criminal record which they stated was my “rap” sheet. I

ignored this as I thought it was nothing more than a bully’s school yard tactic.

5. On or about April 17, 2009 I received a call from Evelyn Adams on

my cell phone. Mrs. Adams informed me that Orly Taitz had put out a documen

called “dossier #6”, that contained my full my name, Social Security number, date

of birth and my husband’s private information. I explained to Mrs. Adams that I

had just left a medical appointment and asked her to send me a copy via email. I

told Mrs. Adams I would call her when I returned home.

6. Once I returned home, I had several emails with the “dossier #6”

attached from several people I knew. Orly Taitz had sent this dossier with my

private data via mass email repeatedly; posted it on her website and all over the

Internet; through mass emailing; postal mailing; presentments during American

grand juries; hand delivered; Taitz during her radio and print interviews was

instructing third parties to download dossier #6 from her website and further

distribute; filed it in other unrelated cases; Taitz also posted it on repubix.com and

oilforimmigration.com where it is still published; sent it through RSS feeds, posted

it on Social network sites (Facebook); tweeted it, and even sent it internationally. I

read Orly Taitz’s dossier #6 and it contained several false statements, allegations

and emails from Neil Sankey at the Sankey Firm, Inc. This was the first time I had





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

heard of any of the Sankey Defendants, see DN 190-3, pp. 220-233; DN 190-4, pp

234-246; DN 190-10, pp. 473-488; and DN 190-24, pp. 938-942. This document

also appears in the docket numerous times in previous filings.

7. The first email I saw was from Mr. Sankey for the Sankey Firm, Inc

to Lisa Ostella and Orly Taitz dated March 16, 2008. This email from Mr. Sankey

contained a “supposed” article about me that had been altered to include “She has

an extensive criminal record going back to the 90's.” This was untrue. See Docket

Number [“DN” or “DN’s”] 57, pp. 6-8; DN 146-5, p. 17, ¶38; DN 144-1, p

11,¶15; DN 190-1, p. 1; DN 190-3, pp. 210, 211, 213; DN 190-24, pp. 921-937

and DN 231, pp. 22-25, 86-90, ¶¶ 63, 69, 216, 218-225.

8. The next email was to a reporter at World Net Daily, Bob Unruh

dated April 10, 2008. In this email it contained a partial of my old Social Security

number and my full current Social Security number, my date of birth and my name

with my middle name misspelled. This email also contained my husband’s name

date of birth and Social Security number. In fact, Mr. Sankey with the Sankey

Firm listed a second Social Security number Mr. Sankey stated my husband was

using and that my husband was on parole, both of which were untrue. The emai

also contained other names, Social Security numbers and dates of birth of people

my husband and I knew. This email with Orly Taitz’s dossier #6 has been filed

with the court several times; see DN’190-3, pp. 213 and 227.





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9. Mr. Sankey with the Sankey Firm sent Orly Taitz two (2) emails on

April 13, 2008, the first with the subject “Berg’s PayPal” stating “ It comes as no

surprise to learn that the link to a Visa donation to Berg, (as opposed to Paypal)

has been removed ”, see DN 190-3, pp. 227-228. This explained the false

assertions and stories by Orly Taitz that my husband had two (2) credit card

accounts set up on Mr. Berg’s website and that my husband and I were stealing

from Mr. Berg. Of course, this was untrue. This false story later changed to my

husband had a PayPal account set up on Mr. Berg’s website, which was also

untrue.

10. We have since learned that the visa lin that they refer to accusing me

of having other accounts was, was in fact a virtual terminal set up by Geoff Staples

for Linkpoint. The virtual terminal was hosted by Geoff Staples with Hostricity

11. The second email on this date was a forward of what Mr. Sankey had

sent to the reporter, Bob Unruh on April 10, 2008 with my private data, and private

data of my husband’s with a note to Orly Taitz stating “ Here is the Liberi stuff you

requested. This is also what I sent to Bob Unruh”, see DN 190-3, p. 226.

12. At this point, with Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey from the Sankey Firm

obtaining and publicizing my private data and that of my husband’s I had to take

web hosting, see DN 146-4, p. 3, paragraph 8.





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Orly Taitz stated she had Neil Sankey conduct background reports and Mr. Sankey

discovered that Lisa Ostella and I were the same person and had stolen

approximately $10,000.00 dollars from her. This was untrue, but this is how Orly

Taitz justified running background and credit reports on me.

15. On May 28, 2009, Mr. Sankey as a private investigator with the

Sankey Firm went on Plains Radio with hosts Edgar and Caren Hale, Defendants

in the Texas portion of this case. Mr. Sankey stated I had been charged with 200

felony counts; was in violation of my probation, was committing fraud; that I was

not a paralegal; that I was selling and reselling the same house; that I had been

convicted of identity theft; that I had been convicted of manipulating credit and

law enforcement reports; and other false statements. Mr. Hale also confirmed on

this radio show that Mr. Sankey had given my private data to Mr. Hale and his

wife. Mr. Hale, based on the information he had been provided by his guest, Neil

Sankey with the Sankey Firm, was discussing a loan I had taken out. The only

way Mr. Sankey and his hosts would have known about the loan I had just

procured was by accessing my credit reports, which Mr. Sankey did not have any

legal basis to obtain. Additionally, Edgar Hale and Neil Sankey were posting my

signature they removed from our Court filings in this case all over the Internet.

See DN 57, filed June 11, 2009 at pages 10-11. A copy of this radio transcript is

on file with this Court; see DN 190-24, pp. 921-937.





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

16. Also during the May 28, 2009 interview of Neil Sankey as a Private

Investigator for the Sankey Firm, Mr. Sankey stated that Lisa Ostella was the one

who ordered the backgrounds on Mr. Berg and I. Shortly thereafter, forged and

altered emails appeared on Orly Taitz’s website bearing Plaintiff Ostella’s email

address to substantiate Mr. Sankey’s false statements.

17. The consumer reports Mr. Sankey using the Sankey Firm’s log in

credentials received included reports from Accurint and LexisNexis. These reports

run by the Sankey Firm, Inc. were on my husband and I both. The reports contain

our names, addresses (every address we ever resided at), my maiden name, Social

Security numbers, dates of birth, cell phone numbers, cell phone carriers,

properties we used to own, our income, property valuations, parents names

addresses, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and the names, addresses,

Social Security numbers, dates of birth, of each and every relative, including

brother-in-laws, and friends. The reports also contain tax liens, bankruptcies

judgments, and other data. These reports even contained information about my

deceased sister.

18. We did not have any idea how Mr. Sankey had obtained mine and my

husband’s private data; and my credit report. At no time had I given any of these

people authorization to obtain any of my private data, that of my husband’s or my





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

credit reports. I always believed and expected that my credit reports and private

data would remain confidential as required by our laws.

19. In June 2009, Orly Taitz posted on her website and told individuals

that I had murdered my sister, she was calling for forensic people, coroners and

summonsing her supporters to contact the Santa Fe Police Department and file

reports against me. Taitz obtained the information that I had a deceased sister from

the reports provided to her by the Sankey Firm, see DN 112; and DN 190-10, pp.

452-457.

20. In or about March 2011, Orly Taitz posted on her website a filing she

had made in the U.S.D.C., District of Columbia. In said document, she stated Mr

Sankey had lost his subscriptions to LexisNexis, ChoicePoint and Accurint.

21. We then began researching articles written by Neil Sankey where he

stated he used LexisNexis, Accurint, ChoicePoint and Intelius to obtain his reports.

22. Neil Sankey as a private investigator with the Sankey Firm assisted

Orly Taitz in carrying her threats out against us. Neil Sankey called the Santa Fe

Probation office, proclaiming to work for Orly Taitz, and stated that they were

“victims” in the case for which I was on probation. Neil Sankey then asked for the

physical address of the probation office.





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

23. Thereafter, Neil Sankey and Orly Taitz sent a stack of paperwork that

included forged and altered emails, where they fraudulently input my AOL email

address, in attempts to have me violated.

24. Neil Sankey’s false accusations about me were reported by him to the

Santa Fe Probation Office through the course of 2-1/2 years, repeatedly. Neil

Sankey also filed criminal reports against me based on his false allegations with

the Santa Fe Police Department.

25. Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey as a private investigator for the Sankey

Firm were summonsing their followers and supporters to file complaints against

me with the San Bernardino County Probation; San Bernardino County District

Attorney’s Office; San Bernardino County Grand Jury; Santa Fe Probation

Department; Santa Fe Police Department; the Attorney Generals of New Mexico

and California, see DN 190-22, pp. 864-867; DN 190-21, pp. 842-845; DN 190-19

pp. 744-748; DN 190-18, pp. 682-693, 700-716; DN 190-16, pp. 629-631; DN

190-10, pp. 452-457; DN 190-7, pp. 395-398; and many others.

26. Neil Sankey as a private investigator for the Sankey Firm, Orly Taitz

and Linda Sue Belcher on their behalf filed false complaints against me with the

Social Security Administration and the New Mexico Taxation.

27. As a result of the above, I had probation appear at my home twice; I

had to meet with the Social Security Administration; and had to talk with the NM





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Taxation; and to Captain Wiggins with the Santa Fe Police Department. In fact

Captain Wiggins was contacted by the Secret Service regarding Taitz harassment

and false allegations against me. I was again cleared of all false allegations. Rose

BobChak, Region Manager of the Santa Fe Probation Department appeared at my

home and stated that Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey were harassing their department

and filing complaints against her and the probation officers because they would not

arrest me. Ms. BobChak stated they did not have grounds to arrest me, that the

allegations made by Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey did not have any merit.

28. I also had strange men appearing at my home, looking in my

windows, my phones were scrambled, my telephone was ringing off the hook, I

was receiving death threats, my family and I were threatened that if we did not

drop the suit against Orly Taitz we would all be meeting our maker very soon.

29. All the time, Neil Sankey by and through the Sankey Firm utilized his

credentials as a private investigator to lend his false allegations credence.

30. In or about July 2010, Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey began publishing a

family picture of mine that my family didn’t even have. The family photo was

taken at our church in Santa Fe in the summer of 2006, as a way for the church to

raise monies. I did not like the pictures, so I never provided them to anyone.

31. After my sister had passed away, I was trying to put a family album

together for my parents. I used the family portrait to scan onto my computer to





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

learn how to use our scanner, thus my family portrait was located on the desktop of

my computer.

32. Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey claimed they received my family portrait

which was of me, my husband and my son, from John Mark Allen. Mr. Allen was

never given this picture, and I find it hard to believe Mr. Allen would want a

picture that my husband was in.

33. In or about 2000, my child’s biological father, John Mark Allen, was

convicted of crimes against my son and me. Restraining orders were put in place, I

was provided a new Social Security number by the Social Security Administration

so Mr. Allen could not track us. My son, husband and I were also in the Safe at

Home program through the California Secretary of State.

34. In 2002, I was granted permission from the family court in our

paternity suit to relocate my minor son to the state of New Mexico. The protective

orders were continued through my son graduating high school. We moved to

Santa Fe and used a governmental agency in Albuquerque, NM so Mr. Allen could

visit his son, again all of which was protected.

35. Neil Sankey through the Sankey Firm has admitted that he sought out

Mr. Allen, and provided our information to him, further endangering me and my

family. Neil Sankey has filed this with the Court in affidavit form, see DN 57, p





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9; DN 136-1, pp. 26-30; DN 143-1, p. 3,¶5; DN 231, pp. 43-44, ¶111; and DN 391-

4, p. 3, ¶6.

36. During this time, Neil Sankey was also emailing Deputy District

Attorney James Secord about me, sending pictures and false statements in attempts

to have me jailed on violations of probation.

37. On March 8, 2011, approximately two weeks before I was finished

with probation, when Neil Sankey, as a private investigator for the Sankey Firm

and Orly Taitz’s false law enforcement and false probation reports failed, they filed

a Petition for Emergency Revocation of Probation against me in the San

Bernardino County Superior Court, Rancho Cucamonga Division in case number

FWV-028000, see EXHIBIT “A”.

38. I learned of Neil Sankey, through the Sankey Firm and Orly Taitz’s

filing from a phone call I received about 6:00 p.m. on or about March 10, 2011

stating I had to be in California the next morning for a hearing. Ms. Moore stated

that Orly Taitz had filed an Emergency Petition to revoke my probation. I asked

Ms. Moore if she had a copy and she stated no, she was not served with anything

and had just learned of it by receiving a call from the Court. I told Ms. Moore I

would call her back.

39. I immediately contacted my attorney, Dean Picl, and told him about

the call. I expressed my concerns with obtaining a flight so late. Mr. Picl stated I





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

would not need to be there, and stated he would call me back. Mr. Picl called Ms

Moore and the Court. Luckily, he was correct; I did not have to attend, but he did.

40. I emailed the Santa Fe Probation Office and informed them of the call

I received from Ms. Moore. I asked if they had a copy of whatever Mr. Sankey

and Orly Taitz had filed with the Court, and learned they didn’t have it either. I

was informed however, that Orly Taitz had again sent a stack to them a few days

before, accusing me of all types of crimes. I was told that no merit was found in

any of Taitz and/or Sankey’s allegations.

41. The Court had asked for a probation report, which they received. The

report stated that I had complied and never been a problem on probation. The

report further stated that Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey’s allegations had been

investigated by the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office; San

Bernardino County Probation Office; San Bernardino County Counsel; and the

Santa Fe Probation office and no violations were found. In other words, Orly Taitz

and Neil Sankey’s reports against me were meritless. The Court stated I was in

compliance and closed the case. Due to the confidential nature of this document, I

will be happy to provide a copy of this report to the Court under seal.

42. Orly Taitz published all the hearings on the Internet and was calling

for people to attend the hearings with her and Neil Sankey, and to complain against





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

me to the Court that I was in violation of probation. See DN’s 190-22, pp. 876-

884.

43. Three Court hearings took place on March 8, 11, and 15, 2011 that

Mr. Sankey was present for. I was again cleared of all false allegations by these

Defendants.

44. After the court hearing on the 15th of March, Orly Taitz and Neil

Sankey went to the District Attorney’s Office to file complaints against the

probation officers in California who attended the hearings, as they did not get what

they wanted, see DN 190-23, pp. 885-894.

45. In Sankey and Taitz’s Petition to Revoke my probation, they accused

me of “uttering and forging” an affidavit of an African Interview1; suborning

perjury from my mother; forging subpoenas2 in Taitz’s name; Social Security

Fraud; Internal Revenue Fraud; Repeated Malicious and Egregious Fraud on the

Court; Attempted Extortion3; Liberi defamed multiple individuals; Liberi claimed

to be an innocent paralegal working for an attorney in Pennsylvania; Liberi

1 The Affidavit they were accusing me of forging was an affidavit prepared and signed by BishopRon McCrae in Pennsylvania, who conducted a telephonic interview with an individual inAfrica.

2 The subpoenas pertained to the subpoenas prepared by Plaintiff Lisa Ostella on behalf of OrlyTaitz, the same subpoenas that Orly Taitz was accusing Lisa Ostella of forging. See DN 386filed September 21, 2011, p. 6, ¶12 and Exhibit “3”, DN 386-2, pp. 2 through 56; and the Court’sDecember 20, 2010 Transcript, DN 162, p. 126, lines 9-25, pp. 127-128, lines 1-25, and p. 129lines 1-22

3 Orly Taitz claims I extorted money from her because I filed suit against her.





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

claimed she was an innocent woman not convicted of a crime; Liberi committed

fraud on the court; Liberi colluded with three (3) other felons, Charles Edward

Lincoln, III; Lucas Smith; and Larry Sinclair 4; that Liberi assisted Ostella in

locking Taitz out of her website; Liberi set up an account in the name of Brent

Liberi and was receiving the monies being donated to Philip J. Berg, Esquire;

Liberi manually handled a website and merchant accounts for attorney Philip J

Berg; Liberi entered into a scheme with attorney Philip J. Berg and set up a

merchant account under the name of “her husband, Brent Liberi”;Donations were

diverted to the account in the name of Brent Liberi therefore the Internal Revenue

Service and Social Security Administration were defrauded; and Liberi is a

vexatious litigant. All of which Neil Sankey as a Private Investigator for the

Sankey Firm and Orly Taitz knew was untrue and falsified.

46. With the above filing, Taitz and Mr. Sankey included altered and

forged documents where Geoff Staples email address was removed and my AOL

email address, [email protected], was fraudulently input to appear that I received

and sent the emails, which I didn’t. The header information to the email is below

each email and shows Geoff Staples at [email protected] and

[email protected] was the one who sent and received the

4 Charles Edward Lincoln, III was Taitz’s Law Clerk and “lover” who sued Taitz in YourHonor’s Court; Lucas Smith and Larry Sinclair were witnesses of Taitz’s in Keyes v. Obama

before Judge Carter, who notified Judge Carter that Taitz suborned perjury from them.





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

emails. This has been filed with the court several times, see DN 145; DN’s 146

through 146-9; and DN 178-4, pp. 205-220.

47. When Mr. Sankey and Orly Taitz did not get their way with the court

in their Malicious prosecution and Abuse of Process against me, Orly Taitz posted

all over the Internet that four (4) additional charges had been filed against me, that

she didn’t know when the trial would be, but she would keep her supporters

updated. See DN 190-23, pp. 885-894.

48. Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey as a private investigator for the Sankey

Firm, Inc. owned and operated by Todd Sankey were fully aware their statements

and allegations against me were false; and filed and asserted these false statements

and allegations with malice in attempts to harm me. Orly Taitz threatened to

destroy me and get rid of me, which Neil Sankey as a private investigator for the

Sankey Firm, Inc. was fully aware and assisted her in her tasks.

49. Due to the continued stress caused by these Defendants, paramedics

had to come to my homes several times and I ended up going in tachycardia5

spending time in the hospital, having extensive cardiac testing and having to go

through enhanced External Counterpulsation [“EECP”] twice, all of which has

been extremely expensive.

5 Although I have had heart attacks and been through open heart surgery, this was the first time Ihad ever gone into or experienced tachycardia.





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50. In addition, with the posting of my name, address, Social Security

number, date of birth, mother’s maiden name, father’s name, my maiden name and

my other confidential information as well as that of my husband, we have been

receiving notices for credit cards and other credit accounts that were fraudulently

opened. I just learned a mortgage was opened using my private data, others have

attempted to obtain my credit reports, we have suffered full identity theft, and will

continue as a result of millions of individuals, including internationally, even if I

applied for a new Social Security number, all these people and businesses have all

my private information needed to call the Social Security Administration and

obtain my new Social Security number.

51. I had taken a signature loan out for my son’s first year of college. This

was the loan discussed on the Plains Radio show with Neil Sankey. Since Nei

Sankey through the Sankey Firm and Orly Taitz has continually published all my

private data, and the identity theft, I was unable to secure loans for my son’s

second and third year of college.

52. I’ve had people call into my utility companies claiming to be me

providing my private data and scheduling my gas to be turned off.





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I declare under the penalty of perjury of the Laws of the United States and

the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 22nd day of March, 2012 in the State of New Mexico.

Lisa Liberi, Declarant





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28EXHIBIT “A”

20




Declaration of Lisa Liberi

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT “B”

115




Home Charges Actions Minutes Probation

Case Report Fine Info Images

Case Number:

Defendant 1 of 1

Case FWV028000 Defendant 1608112 LIBERI, LISA R

Related Cases On Calendar

This Defendant Does Not Have Any Other Cases With Future Hearings Scheduled.

Actions On Case

Action Date Action Text Disposition Hearing Type Image

04/15/2011 CERT COPY OF M/O AT ATTY P/U BIN

03/15/2011 8:30

AM DEPT. R7PROBATION REVIEW HEARING - Minutes DISPOSED

03/15/2011 PROBATION OFFICER'S MEMO FILED 03/15/2011.

03/15/2011LETTER DATED 03/14/2011 RECEIVED FROM

GEOFFREY STAPLES RE: IMPACT STATEMENT

03/11/2011 8:30


03/11/2011 PROBATION OFFICER'S MEMO FILED 03/11/2011.

03/08/2011 8:30


03/08/2011DEMAND FOR EMERGENCY REVOC OF PROB HRG

RCVD

028000 - Actions - San Bernardino Main http://openaccess.sb-court.org/OpenAccess/CRIMINAL/actionlist

3/21/2012

116




Home Charges Actions Minutes Probation

Case Report Fine Info Images

Case Number:

Case FWV028000 Defendant 1608112 LIBERI, LISA RDefendant 1 of 1

Action:

Case FWV028000 Defendant 1608112 LIBERI, LISA R

Action: PROBATION REVIEW HEARING Date: 03/15/2011 Time: 8:30 AMDivision: R7 Hearing Status: DISPOSED

SHAHLA S SABET, J-JUDGE

CLERK: TERA SORENSEN

CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER: RV-REGINA VEGA CSR# RV-12612

BAILIFF G DECKER

-

APPEARANCES

DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JAMES SECORD PRESENT.

ATTORNEY DEAN PICL (COURT APPOINTED) PRESENT.PURSUANT TO SECTION 977 PC, COUNSEL PRESENT WITHOUT DEFENDANT.

-

PROBATION OFFICER ADRIENNE MOORE PRESENT.

-

PROCEEDINGS

ACTION CAME ON FOR PROBATION REVIEW HEARING

COURT HAS READ AND CONSIDERED PROBATION MEMO DATED 03/14/2011

-

THE COURT FINDS THE DEFENDANT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PROBATION.

COURT ORDERS PROBATION TO CONTINUE ON SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

-

CUSTODY STATUS

CASE CUSTODY - PROBATION.

PROBATION OFFICE NOTIFIED.

============= MINUTE ORDER END ================

PREVIOUS MINUTES PRINTED.

CASE CLOSED.

028000 - Minutes - San Bernardino Main http://openaccess.sb-court.org/OpenAccess/CRIMINAL/minute.as

3/21/2012

117




Liberi, et al Plaintiffs Cert of Svc re Liberi Declaration 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Philip J. Berg, Esquire (PA I.D. 9867)E-mail: [email protected]

LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Telephone: (610) 825-3134 Fax: (610) 834-7659 Attorney in pro se and for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LISA LIBERI, et al,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ORLY TAITZ, et al,Defendants.

:

::::::::::

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER:8:11-cv-00485-AG (AJW)

PLAINTIFFS CERTIFICATE OF

SERVICE

I, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, hereby certify a true and correct copy of Declaration of

Lisa Liberi in support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment against Defendants

Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc.; and Certificate of Service was served through

the ECF filing system this 22nd

day of March 2012 upon the following:

Marc Steven Colen, Esq.Law Offices of Marc Steven Colen

5737 Kanan Road, Ste. 347

Agoura Hills, CA 91301Email: [email protected]

Served via the ECF Filing System

Attorney for Defendants: Todd Sankey; and The Sankey Firm, Inc.

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 483-1 Filed 03/22/12 Page 1 of 2 Page ID#:11909



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

Orly Taitz29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, Suite 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688Email: [email protected] and

Email: [email protected] via the ECF Filing System

Attorney for Defendant Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc.

Kim Schumann, Esquire

Jeffrey P. Cunningham, EsquirePeter Cook, Esquire

SCHUMANN, RALLO & ROSENBERG, LLP

3100 Bristol Street, Suite 400

Costa Mesa, CA 92626Email: [email protected]

Served via the ECF Filing System

Attorney for Defendants Orly Taitz; Orly Taitz, Inc.; and Law Offices of Orly Taitz

James F McCabe

Morrison & Foerster

425 Market St

San Francisco, CA 94105-2482Email: [email protected]

Served via the ECF Filing SystemAttorney for Defendants:

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 483-1 Filed 03/22/12 Page 2 of 2 Page ID#:11910

Liberi v Taitz - Decl of Lisa Liberi Doc 483

Documents

Transcript of Liberi v Taitz - Decl of Lisa Liberi Doc 483