Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez

7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 1/13

NOTICE

&

DEMAND

TO RETRACT & CORREC'T

DEFAMATORY

SLANDEROUS LIBELOUS STA|I'EMENTS

OF

Nicklas

Hoffman

&

Richard

Rodriguez OR BE SUBJEC'I'

TO

COURT

ACTION

FOR DEFAMATION

OF

CHARACTER

SLANDER & I,IBEL CALIF.

CIVI CODE

SI'CI'I'ON

43-44

Courtney

Gillespie &

Melody Gillespie

C/O:

PO Box,

P.O.

Box

8323;

Porterville,

Porterville, Californi

a

[

93257

|

RE,:

TO: Nicklas Hoffman &

Richard

Rodriguez

1831 N.

Lime

Street,

Tulare County,

California,

93257

;

[NEAR

PORTERVILLEI

Notice

&

Demand to

lletract

& Correct

DE,FAMATORY

S'[A'I-IIME

NT S

AGAI

N S'['

Courtney

& Melody Gillespie;

&

TO

CEASE,

&

DH,SIST

YOIJR

DE,ITAM{TION

OF

CIIARACTER

AT'IACKS AGAINS'I'

Courtney

& Melody Gillespie

Pursuant

to

CALIF. CIVIL

CODE

SECT.

$$

48a

TO:

Nicklas

Hoffman & Richard

Rodriguez

1831 N.

Lime

Street.

Tulare

Countv

California.

near

Porterville California

;

We have recently discovered in

June

12,,2015 the following

Defamatory

statements

madc by

you

in

the

world

wide web,

the

'internet'

published

& broadcast

on

youtube.com.;

We

are hereby

demanding that you immediately

&

forthwith

retract,

&

correct thc

falsc

defamatory matter cited &

quoted

below by

which

you

have

publiclv

defamed us, slandered

us,

Iibeled us, damaging

our

image,

character

reputation & standing

with

our

friends, in

the

Church,

the

community,

& among

our

piersl

If

you

fail

to do

so

we will

file

a Court

Action in

the

Tulare County Superior

Court

for damages

pursuant

to the

California

Law

on

Character Defamation,

Slander

& Libel, which

Law

is sot

out

here

below at the end of

this

Notice

and

Demand.

l. Nicklas

Hoffmun & Richard

Rodriguez,

vou

are lterebv

given

Notice

of

tlte Demands

of Courtney

& Melodv

Gillesnie,

nursuant

to Culi€ornia

Civil Cocle

Section

48s, that

vou

immediatelv

retract

&

conect

the

following

Defamatorv

false

ststements

which

are

highlighted

in

vellow,

which

vou

made in

tlte

following

broadcssts,

(l)

From

the YOUTUBE.COM

Video

titled

"Savc

our

family Ranch,

the

Story"

publishcd

on

July

13, 2014, the

inserted

description

of the video

oowe

are

going

to

lose our ranch

unless

we

pay

a

$

20,000

uniust Judgment bv

Oc

"



See m

o

re

at http :

//nicklas

arthur.wordpress.co

m/2

0

2.

"Hind

sight tells

me now that

this

is when I should have

pressed

them

and initiated eviction

if

they refused.I

could

have

saved

myself

years

of

anguish tens of thousands of

dollars

Richard,

well,

maybe,

but

I

could

never have

guessed

what

they

really had in

mind."

(10:56)

3.

ooWhen

they

did appear for

the

final

date, they feigned

that they were

still

interested

in

purchasing

the

West

half

of the

property.

Of

course

they

knew

there was

no

way

the

Church

was

going

to award

them half

of the

property

for

free on

a technicality. They did default

on the

Church Mediated

agreement."

(12:08)

Richard

Rodriguez,

his

partner

in

the

clip

then

asks

Hoffman:

o'What

did they

do

next?"

(12:10)

Hoffman

answers:

ooWell

myAhab

and Jczabcl

and I

call them

Ahab

and Jezabel here

because

it

takes

me

back

to that

biblical

story

where

Ahab

looked

over his

fence and saw his Neighbors vineyard and he wanted

it

for his own

garden

and his

neighbor

wouldn't

sell

it

to

him,

so

he

went crying

to his

wife

Jezabel,

now

they were

the King and

Queen

of

Israel, so Jezabel

said

don't

worry

about

it honey,

I

got

it

all

in

hand,

and

she

used

the law to convict

the owner

of the

property

of blasphemy

had

him

stoned

to

death,

and she

took

the

property

and

gave

it

to

her husband

Ahab

. But

fortunately,

my

Ahab

and Jezabel

aren't

king

and

queen

of

anything

,

ok

(laughing)

so,

I

don't

have to

worry

for

my life,

I

don't

think,

at

least

I

hope

not.

Um,

anyway, my

Ahab

and Jczabcl had

a

different

tactic

in mind

than

having

it

mediate

by

the

Church.

They would

take the

entire

property

from

us

by this technicality

of state

law,

in her

own

words

from

the

transcript

of

our

eviction

action the

California

law is very

clear on

that,

and the Civil

Code

is,

when

a

good

faith

payment

is

tendered and

rejected,

it

is a debt

forgiven, when

I tried

to refund their monep

and

canceled

the

note,

according

to

her

understanding

I

gave

them the

property,

and

I have

discovered

that that

was

their intent

the whole

time

they

stayed

on the

property,

because

the

property

and

family

because information from

our

property

and

family trust

files

that

I

kept

in

my

office and went missing

from my

office about

two

thousand six or seven, showcd

up

in

some of their

pleadings

and

there's

no other way

they could

have had

that

information unless

they

took

those

files.

But I

have

to admit,

I

was

totally

clueless, until

they

showcd

thcir

hostility."

(14:22)

4.

"When

I insisted

that the electrician

he

hired cease

and desist Mr. G assaulted

me

knocking

me

down in

the

gateway

and, and

when I tried to stand

back

up

he hit me

with

the

gate

again

knocking

me

down in

the

gravel

approach. I then called the

Sheriff

notified

him that

he

could

not

disconnect

my house from

the service.

His

workers, they

didn't

see anything,

and

Mr.

(i.

said I

swung at him

first.

So

as

far

as

an assault charge

it

was his

word

against mine.

Ilut

for

me

that

was the last

straw, Richard,

because the

church

mediation has

no cnforccmcnt

arm

I

then decided

to file an eviction

suit.

(15:44)

5. Richard

stated:

'oHow

did

that

eviction

go

?" Hoffman:

"

..".,.""

they

successfully

muddied the

waters

so

much

that

the Judge decided

to

deny

relief

on

a

technicalit5r,"..."

6.

"I

was no threat to them, contrarily

Mr. G

had

actually

assaulted

me."

7.

('They

now use the secured

possession

of the south

120 feet

of

my

property

as a launching

pad

from

which to

exdcute

their

plan

to

destrqy

me, my

family

and

my

livelihood in

order

to take

the

property

away

from

us.

Uh

their

plan

was to

have me

thrown in

jail,

on

gun

charges

then

move

into my

house, I'd

be

in

jail,I'd

get

out of

jail,

and

they'd

be

in my

house,

what



could

I do, I'd

have

to

try

to

go

at

law

to

get

'em,

but

I

would

be

destitute

because

all

mv work

is

here

on the

property,

and

you

know,I

need

my

equipment

and

my

and

for my internet

business.

I'd have

nothing

you

know

but

this

was

their

plan,

and they

told this

to a neighbor,

and

when the neighbor,

of

course they

put

it

in friendly terms,

what a scoundrel

I

was, and how

they had

a

right

to

do

these

things to

me,

when a

neighbor

asked them where

my family,

thev

coldly

replied

that they

can

live in

a motel,

so I'd

get

out

of

jailr

l'd be

in a

motel, my

children

would

be

in

foster

care, and

we would be

destitute,

with

nothing

on the street, nice

people

hu

?

When they

asked me

to take them in,

wow, thatrs heavy

."

(21235)

8.

Richard

Rodriguez

asks:

"So

what's

happened

during

the three

years

?"

Hoffman says:

*

Well in

the meantime

they

had

sabotaged my

phone

and DSL lines

finally

sevcring

thom

completely

then

they

destroyed

my

electric

service causing me

to

have

an almost one month

lapse

in service

this

in

an

attempt

to

destroy us

financially

so that

we

could

no longer

afford

to

fight

them

in

Court. They

\ilere

successful.

I lost all my syndicated

production

accounts

simply

because

I

could not

provide

reliable service.

And

how

this works,

is I

produced

radio

programs

on the

internet

and then

they

went out

to

Nation wide

to

short

wave and

AM

FM affiliates

and

I

got

all

the

advertising

when

I can no longer

provide

those accounts I didn't

get

the

advertising

anymore,

so

I

couldntt

still

air

the broadcast,

but

you

know,

so

when I lost

themo because

I

couldn't

provide reliable

service,

with

them

went

most

of my

earnings, oh, my

meager savings

were

exhausted

quickly

I notified my

Lawyer in January

of

2013 that I

could

no longer

afford

to

pay

him anything.

He

told

me

that he would finish

the

quiet

title

only, as

it

was

unlikely that

the

court would allow him

to drop the case anyway, ah, we

are now

surviving

on about

$1000

dollars

per

month in

donations

per programs

that

I don't

get

paid

for and don't have

national

syndication,

so

it's all donation

based.

Ah,

with

the

downturn in

the economy,

to

me it

seems

impossible

to

replace

the

accounts

I lost.o'

9. Richard

says:

"So

how

did

the

new

Judge

work out ?"

Hoffman says:

'6Well,

had

a history

with

him,

um,

if

we

go

back to

the

incident

where

they

cut off the

electricity because we

had mutual

restraining

Orders, he

had violated

the

restraining order

on several occasions.

Um,

we

iust

didn't

bother,like,

when

he

cut the phone lines,

finally

and

all

the

sabotage, we

can't

prove

these things,

you

know,

because

we had no witnesses, and ah, a

restraining

orders,

you

know,

contempt

of

court

on a

restraining

order is

quasi

criminal,

so the

burden

of

proof

is

absolute

you

have to

have

witnesses,

so we couldnrt

do

anything,

when he cut the

electricity ol'1,

the

circumstances

arose

where

he

would not allow

us, he

would not

leave

the

location

where

my

utilities

came into

the

property,

so

we

got

an emergency hearing,

you

know

you

can

get,

in a

day

or

so, before

this same

Judge, the new

Judge on the case, and he

denied us, uh, to

order

Mr.

Gillespie

to refrain from

interfering

getting

our

a,

restoring, allowing

us

to

restore,

our

electric

service

so

he

denied

that,

he

didn't

seem

to care

you

know,

that

me,

my

adult

retarded

son,

my

daughter,

and

a,

you

were here at that time,

you

came

to

the

property

just

a month

before that,

and

he

didn't

seem

to

mind

that

we

went

a

month

without

electricity because

we

told

him

that

it would

be

a

month or

more,

because

that's

what

SC was

telling

me

beforc

thcy

can schedule,

to retrench

the service,

400 feet down the

road

to

install

new

service,

in

front of

the

house,

then

connect us

up,

ok,

um,

so, anyway,

he

denied

that, so

that

was my

history with

that Judge."

10.

lloffman

stated:"'But

uh, nope, thatrs ngt

what

happened, um, he decided, this new

Judge

decidedo

balancing

the equities meant

that

I

would

pay

80

per

cent of

all electricity bills

incurred

by them for the

entire

ten

year

period,

they

would

get

15

thousand

for

work

they



never did

on

our

property,

which

supposedly

added value. Ah, they would only

pay

is 250

pcr

month

for rent,

but

we

would

get

nothing

for damages, legal

expenses, and

all

of

our

loses.

So

this

when it

was all balanced

out,

put

us

into

debt to them,

for

almost

twenty

thousand dollars,

here,

the decision,

was

that, my family,

we were the

iniured

party,

yet,

we had

to

pay

them

twenty

thousand

dollars,

for the

privilege

of being iniured

by them.

So

now

what could I

do?

So

now I have

ninety

days

to

come up

with

the

money,

before

they

begin

legal

action, to

force

sale of home,

in

order to

collect on

that, which I'm

sure they

will

do, because they have

filed

at

least

six

other law

suits against

me,

my lawyer,

other

family

members, and

even

business

associates

are named

as co-defendants in these law suits.'o

Richard

statcs:

"Sounds

like they

are

intent

on continuing

the campaign, and do

you

think

the

first

Judge

would

have

seen

things

differently

?

Nicklas:

"Ya,I

believe

the

first.Iudge would

havc

rcndcrcd

an

cntirely different

decision,

um, unfortunately,

you

know, they

wore him

out,

with I

think

fivc

recusals,

and

a,

and

for what

ever

reason

I

can't

blame

him for

not

wanting

to continuc

with

the case, I

didn't want to

continue,

you

know,

yes

I believe he

would

havc rcndcrcd an cntircly

different decision,

but

an appeal

would

mean more

years

in court, morc

in lcgal fccs,

than

thc

twenty

thousand

dollar

Judgment

against

us."

11..

Hoffman

stated:

"I

hope

we can

raise the money by

telling

people

our

story,

um, any extra

donations, we collect

will

go

to legal accounting

and

other

loses,

because

the

loses

havc already

been about

forty

thousand

in

actual out

of

pocket

loses, including

legal and

damages

that

wefve

incurred to this time,

and add to

that

the

twenfy

thousand

we have to

pay

themo thats

sixfy thousand dollars total loss, that was what they

wanted to steal

from

me

in

the beginning,

and so

they

have damaged

me

that

much,

but

they

still

want

the

property.

its amazing,

but

I

just

don't

understand

how

they

justiff

all

this in their

mind,

uh,

you

know this

is

the

short

version

of the story.

These

people

have

caused

so much

anguish and

distress

to all

of

us

if

you

can only

give

a

few

dollars,

please

help

us,I,

I

pray

that,

you

never have to, anyone out

there,

that

you

never have

to,

you

never have such

friends

in

your

life

that

could

betray

you

as

these

people

have

us,

if

anyone

wants

the long

version

perhaps

it

would

make

a

good

human

interest,

or a

terror movie

of a sort,

ah I have

some

good

ideas atrout

that

too, ah,

please

contact

us

for

further

details

and

proof,

and

thank you Richard

for

being

here

with

me.o'

(end

of first

youtube.com

clip)

FROM

THE 2nd YOUTUBE.COM

Ctip Titted:

'oSave

our Ranch update"

published

on

July

1612014

;

12.

Hoffman

states

at

4z16:

('In

the

by

and

by

he

offered

to

purchase

half the

property,

and we

had

a

written agreement

for

that,

and

he broke the agreement.

But

he decided to

set

me up

set up

circumstances

whereby

he

could

steal the

property

from us on a technicality.".."But

I

did

ask them in 2009

to

leave the

properfy,

and

thats when

they let

their hostilities

bc

known

against me and

my

family and

they've

done

everything they

could

to, ah,

destroy

me and my

family,

first

Amendment Radio.net

and

all

of my

work, in

order to,

ah,

you know cripple

us

financially,

so they could

have

their

way

with

us

in court,

so call

them

my Ahab

and Jezabel"

..."" So in the same way,

this man's

wife

,

because

she's

a legal

activist

and

you

know shc

does,

what a

you

call t]rat..

legal work"...."

"and

she

decided

that,

um, they could build

a case, even

if

they had

to build

it

from

scratch,

by

fqlsiffing

evidence

and

other

things,

which

they

did to set me up for, to

use a, um, what

you

call

it,

a technicality

of

lawn to steal

the

property

from me, and the

technicality of

law,

works

like

this"r..."" lf

someone sells

you

a

piece

of



property

and

you

begin

to

make

payments

on the

property

for a

year,

however if the

person

selling it

decides that

they

want

the

property

back, because the

railroads

coming

through,

right,

they realize,

oh,I

made

a

mistake,

the

railroads

coming

through, now this

property's

going

to be

worth

ten

times what it was,

so they

refuse

to

take

payments,

so they can

foreclose

on

you,

so that's what

the

technicality

is

in

the

law for,

so, she

thought

she

would fabricatc

evidence, in

order to

take

advantage of

this technicality

so

that they could

take the

property

from

me,

right,

and

that

would

be evil, if

someone

sold

you

a

piece

of

property

and they camc

back

after you

made

a

year or

ten years of payments on

it,

and refuse to

take

payments

o

because

then it

says,

if

they refuse

to take

payments,

then

that

means

that

the debt is

forgiven,

under that

circumstance,

rightt'

Richard

says:

t'thats

correct

"Nicklas

says:

"So

they

tried

to

fabricate

evidence

and

build

a case but

it

didn't work,

but they

dragged us

through

the

court

by

misusing

and abusing

court

procedure.,

and rules, ah

for

more

than, well it's

been

five

years

now. They

also misused

the court

and

procedures

to maintain

possession

of the

south

l2ll

fcet

of my

properfy

so that

they could launch

their campaign to destroy

me,

they've done a

lot

of

evil

things

to

me."

(17:08)

"These

are

some of the

things,

and worse

things

they've

done,

you

know,

cutting,

sabotaging

our internet

connection, and

phone

lines,

continually,

over

a couple

year

period,

finally severing

them

completely,

so that we were without

service,

almost

a

wcek

before the telephone

company

came

out

quickly

and

retrenched 600

feet

down the

road

to my

studio

here,

and replaced

my

lines, now

I

have

back

up

cable

internet

too,

so

I'm

very

secure

now,

in my

connection, and

a

keeping my

work

going.

They

also continually

messed

with

my

electricity, shutting it

off.

Because

my

services were

brought in at the corner

of the

property

closest to

where the

services

were and they

went underground

to my

house from

there

so

because

they

had

possession,

absolute

possession

of

that

portion given

to

them by

misusc

of the

court

system um,

they were able

to

harass

us

in that way

and sabotage, and then they

finally

uh, cut off our

electricity all

together,

about a month

after

you

arrived on

the

property."..".."

(22:40\

66I

spied a bucket

truck

out

there,

with electrician for

southern California

Edison

technician",

do

you

remember

what

he

said

?" Richard:

tt

He said

your power got

shut oI1,

discontinued"..

Nicklas

stated:

"

Yao

the

power got

discontinued, he shut

it

off because

of

non

payment

of the

power

bill,

because these

people

had taken over and had

possession

of my

property they

also

had control

thru

a

fictitious

entity

of the

electric

utilities

service

"

(12:34).

And they

thought

it also

made

their case look

better

because then

they could

get

reimbursed

and have

some kind

of

claim

against me.

"

(23:55)

13.

(32:20):

...".."he

breached

the contracto

but

then

came up with

a

technicality

whereby

they

were

going

to steal

the

property

from

me.

'o

(32:28)

"

Then they started

putting

together

,

constructing

false

evidence.

Q2234)

"We

filed

a

quiet

title which they knew

they

couldn't"

Nicklas asks

Richard Rodriguez:

"Am

I

a

liar

Richard",(etc) Richard

says:

"everything

hc

says

is

true"156Mr.

Gillespie had

demolished the

service

panel

and

SCE

wouldn't

hook it

up until

we

got

it cleared

by the County

and had a

permit

and

all that"

got

it

signed

off by

the county again,,"

'0..."..""

even

though it

would

cost us

$4000

dollars

and

take

over a

month to

get

our electricity

hooked back

up by trenching

400

feet down the

road."

"I

was

without

electricity

for

over three

weeks"

ttl

lost all my

production

accountstt

"the

computers

got

all

messed

up

because

of the bad

electricity

from the

generators"

..."

"two

generators

running continually"

forfy

dollars

worth

of

gas

a

day"..""

God

provided

three thousand

dollars

ten days

before the

power

went off'

(al:00)

So I

iust

held onto

it"..".."

we

did

have the funds

to

pay

for

the services

that

I already installe

d

and

paid

for,

to

hhve

them installed

again.".."and

having to face trumped up

gun

charges on

several occasions

"..

'obeing

watched continually"

"so

they

trumped

up this thing

where

I

shot

their friend

in

the eye,

and she

actually

swore

out

an

affidavit

saying

that this

actually

5



happened"ooand

you

know,

for

me

the

temptation

was

to retaliate in

kind, a, to

go

over thcre, and

murder

them,

and

things like

that,

you

know

cause

you

have

these

feelings.".."and

tempted to

fabricate

evidence,

or

whatever"...."

because I may

not

get

a

million

dollar multi million dollar

book

and

movie

deals

now

for

writing lies, I

certainly

canrt

get

it for

writing

the

truth,

but my

true reward

is beyond

what

any of

these

people

will ever

achieve, they

will lose

everything,

when

the

true resurrection

or their life

comes

to

an end

which ever comes

first."

(46:00-fQ

"They're

wise in

the ways of

evil

in

screwing

people

over,

inn

using

the

court

system"

"wise

evil

men rulc

the

world,

OK'

(a8:30-38).

From

YOUTUBE.COM Video

titled:

*PRTV

082714b"

published

August

28,2014,

from

Cross

theBoarder.org

14.

Nicklas Hoffman

states:

o'I

think

I've

got

like two

thousand

six

hundred dollars

raiscd on

linc

and then

offline I've

probably

raised a little more

than two thousand dollars."

15. From YOUTUBE.COM

Video

6'Ranch

Update

2"

published

on

August

2,2014,

at

33:20:

"It

adds

up

quickly

when

you

have people

that

iust

attack

and

attack,

I

mean,

you know

I

think

at least twelve

(12)

law suits, then they

attack

my

lawyer,

attack

my friend, attack

my

business associates,

cut

off

my

phone,

and

just

try

to destroy

thc work

that

I'm

doing

hcrc

becoming Satan's

puppets

that's

all they

are to

me is Satan's

puppets."

16.

"..""..so

I'm

going

to

give

what I have

on

that

date,

and then

they're

going

to

drag

mc

into

court for the rest of

it,

so I have

to

keep

paying

them

until

its

done."..."...

I think the

only

reason

they

asked

for

the

ninety

days

is

so

they

could

figure out a way to

stay

(45:20) I

mean,

I

think

their life

would be

over if they

couldn't

you

know carry out

Satan's

plan

to destroy me

and

my

family and the

work

that

I'm

doing

here. Actually, these

people

are

that

delusional

thnt

they

think

that

this

is

their

lifes

mission" Rodriguez

chimes in

("Ya"

IIoITman continucs:

"

They've

been

doing this

for

five years now and of

course

you know,

God

has

allowed them

to

come so far but

no

further,

well anyway

(45:43)

At

45247 Richard Rodriguez says:

"I

scc

thcl'

are

some

very delusional

people.

I

seen

their true

colors though,

yes

I

have." At 45:55

IlolTman

says

"Yes,

and

they

lie

at the

drop

of a

hat

man, therers

not

a

problem,

Rodriguez

chimes

in

"Quick"l

Hoffman

says:

"They

count,I

mean they, that's why,I'm

iust

amazed

at

the Judges

decision

but

see

the

Judge is

not

God

he's

probably

not

a

Godly

man,

if

any of the .Iudges

are

Free

Masons itrs

probably

that Judge"..."

he had to

put

them off the

property,

even

though

he

did favor

these

evil

people

by

giving

themo

you

know a Judgment that

they

weren't cntitled

to.'o Rodriguez

says:

66

Thats

Right";

Hoffman

says:

otHe

went

against

the evidence,

or

he

may

have

just

not liked

me,

or

the

way

I looked,

you

know,

it

poulda'

iust

come

down to

that,

ah, hc

could

just

trusted them

more

than

he

trusted

me,

or

because

they,

throw,

they slung

so

much

mud, that

some

of

it

stuck,

you know,

and

he

was

influenced by

the,

because he

probablv

thought by

the

volume

of

their

accusations

against

me

that

certainly

there

must

be some

truth

to it, ah

even though,

the

evidence

was

contrary,

because

you

know,

and

that's

the advantage

that

the

evil

have over

us, in the world,

is

that

they

are

allowed

to

bare

false witness

against

their neighbor, whereas we keep his commandments,

and it doesn't

matter

if

wc

hatc

our

neighbor or they're

trying

to destroy

us us, we still

can not repay

evil for evil,

because

if

I would

bare false witness against

them

and

start

making

false accusations

against

thcm that

would bc

repaying

evil for

evil, but it

gives

our

adversaries

an advantage

in

the systoms

of

mcn,

but nol

(;



before the

Judge and the court that really

matters,

the cloud of witnesses

that

ovcrsccs

us all,

and the real court, and

the real trial

that

I should say,

that's

going

on daily

and

is

bcing

plaved

out

in all our

lives,

because we're all

on trial

for our whole

lives, and

that's anothcr

thing that

I've been realizing

going

through

this court system thing,

is

that

we

are

in

trial evcryday

and

there are a

cloud

of witnessesrwe have a

Jury,

only,

there's only

this one that's

going

to

makc

a

decision,

and

that

is

the

great

King Judge

of us

all,

and

that

is

Jeshua,

Jcsus.

ltichard

Rodriguez

states: I

know there's

going

to be a

lot of work

to

be done over

there,

thcy.iust,

thcv

thrashed

that

place". Nicklas

says:

"ya.

Richard

says:

"

You

know

what

I

mean,

clearly.

.f

unk

everywheret'

Nicklas

says:

'o

lt's a mess, but that's

the least of

our

problems."

Richard

says:

"

Yar I

know".."

Nicklas

states:

'6

But I

don't

want

to

be tied

to these

people,

I'd

rathcr

cut'em

Ioose

as soon as

possible,

because they need to

go

on

with

their

life,

and

dcal

with thc

rcal

problems

that they

have because Satan's. had

control

over

them

for so

long, that, a,

I'm

surc

that

a

lot

of

that

is

being

played

out

in

their

flcsh,

you

know,

physical problems

and so

f'orth,

and their own family's

going

to hell in a hand basket,

I

can

see

it,

but

they can't,

bccausc

thcy

can't

even see

the road they're

on" Richard says

"Post

this on

your

face book,

sharc

it,

we

nccd

to

get

as

many

shares

as

we can,

you

know it's not share'n

as

much,

but

sharc

this, uho

youcaring.com

save

the

ranch,

then

Nicklas

states,

o'OK

I'll

put

the

link

in

thcro oncc

again

and

paste

it

and

then we

go

send,

and

it's

in

there

once

again,

so

ya,

please,

uh, do

it

thrce or

four

times

during

the week.

Ok that's

all

we have

time for,

I'm

Nicklas

Arthur,

with

Richard,

signing off.

FROM YOUTUBE.COM

Video

titled:

"RANCH

UPDATE

2

Published

August

2,2014,

at 33:55:

17.

Nicklas Hoffman

states:

o'Anyway

speaking

of

miracles"..."If these

people repented and

withdrew

their complaints

and

withdrew

the

lien

against

our

ranch, that

would

bc a miraclc,

O.K"..."that

would be the best miracle of a11"..."

if they repent

theytre

not my

enemy any

more.o'

That's

right

if

they

repent

of the

evil they've

done,

and truly repent

turn

their

lives

around

and said

we

were led

astray

ah,

whatever,

that would

be

probably

the

best

miracle

so

perhaps

all

of

you

can,

when

you're praying

for

me and

my ranch,

and God

to smitetem,

father,

so we

would like to see

them

repent,

that

would be the best thing of

all,

because

at

one

time they

at least,

pretended

to be

my friends

you

know, I

knew they

pretended

for

a long

time, while

they were

making

other

plans

(36:18)

At

38:38

Nicklas

stated

"They

made

false

accusations

against

me

and

then when

I

went

into

it,

it

was

the

same

Judge

that took

over the

case during

the last ten

percent

and

turned

thc

wholc

thing around, and awarded

the restraining order,

in California

if

you get

a

restraining Order

you

lose

your

second amendment

gun

Rights,

you

have none, and

thats why they

went

about

to

build

gun

charges

against

me,

because they

knew

I

had

formerly at

one

time

had

a

twenty two

caliber

rifle,

that

I

was supposed

to have had and then

see my

posse$sion would bring

in Federal

gun

charges"..."

and I

would definitely

go

to

jail,

and

that

was what

they

were

trying

to

construct

against

me on

the gun charges

they

didn't just

try

once,

they

tried

twice,

and they

failed

twicc."

18. Iloffman

said:

*They

said I shot

not

with

a bee

bee

gun,

but

with

a

high

powered

pellct

gun,

Brent

Wade,

that

belonged

to

you,

that

you

had on, that

I

wouldn't

allow

you

to

have on

my

ranch

so

you pu

it

on consignment.

So

they constructed

a

story

of me

using

that

pcllet

rifle

and

shooting a

womhn

in

the

face

with

it. T\ey

actually

got

a

woman to

sign

a

complaint

and

lie,

saying

that

it

actually

happened,

but it

never happened.

Just

look at what

they

did

with

the

quiet

title

putting

it

off

for

four

years,

so this

is the

diabolical

plan

that these

people

tried

to



execute

against me, and

why

it

took so long not to mention

using

RICO

statutes." Thev tricd

numerous

times

to

get

the

County

Prosecutor

to

come

after

me,

and the City

Prosecutor, of the

local

town

to come

after

me, and the

City

prosecutor,

of the

local town to

come

after

mc, thcy

had

priorities

because

they

couldn't

keep

their

story

straight and

you

know,

and they

had

no

evidence

that

I

was

involved in

any

criminal activity,

I

mean, because

I don't have

any

priors,

I'vc

never

been

arrested

in

my life,

never been

charged

with

a

crime kind

of

difficult

to

go

from

there, to

get

me

as

the

God

father of

racketeering, as the

Godfather

of

Tulare

County.

I

don't

think

the

County

Prosecutor was

buying

it

,

so

these

are the

kind

of attacks,

I'm

iust

glad

that

Satan was using these

weaker

people

against

me,

didn't

have

any

big timc Jesuit,

you

know

coming

after

me,

like they did after

Tony

Alamo

and

others"...".."

From

the

YOUTUBE.COM

video

title

*TEMPLE

MOUNT

Maybe

Wrong

Location"

Feb. 11,2015

19. at

39:29

Nicklas

Hoffman

states:

"But

then they

hired a lawyer

for a day

to cxaminc

mc,

this

guys

kind

of

like

a bull dog,

OK,

and

a

apparently

I know more

than their

bulldog

knows,

because

I

knew

that

he

couldn't

ask me

personal

questions"

at 39:55

Nicklas

says:

"Ilut

their

Lawyer

has

little

honor

as

far

as

I'm

concerned,

he's

just

a

paid bulldog,

for

thc

day, bccausc

they

like

to

be

their own attorney,

so anyway

I

hope he

got'em

real

good

on

fees,

ya".

(40:15).

20. Hoffman

says:

"another

thing

I found out,

you

know

how Paypal,

shut

us

down, and

I

had

to

refund all

of the

help,

the

funds

that

people

were,

giving,

um I found

out

that,

they

complainedo

because their

lawyer

brought

up

the

page

in

the

conference

room

there

when they were

grilling

me and when I told

them,

cause

he

says

well where

is this

money

at, and I

told

him that

it

got

shut

down

and I had

to refund all

those funds, and

immediately

I know by

looking

at

their

face, uh, faces, that they

had

complained,

and had

the

thing shut

down,

didn't

quitc

put

it

together before that,

yao

it

was cause they accepted

that

immediately without

question,

they

already knew

it,

that's what

I discovered and

that they were

responsible

fbr

shutting

down

thc

go

fund

me

thing

that

we

had

going there at,

like

I

said

I

had

to refund

most of

those,

all

of the

ones that

came

from

pay

pal,

I

had

to

refund,

and I

don't think

I've

got, got

a few of

those

back

so

I do have a

little

bit

of

money

a

couple

thousand

dollars

put

up

for this, that

people

gave

itrs

still sitting there but its nol

gonna

be

enough

,

so as

soon as this

thing

is done

we'll

see

whatrs

left

and

hopefully

werll

get

a Judgment

against

them

but

its unlikely

like I

said the

Judge

seems very

biased

but

if he

does

his

true

job,

I

think

that

I have damages

coming against

them,

that

we

couldn't

get

the

Quiet

Title Equity

thing"..."it

doesn't mean

I

wouldn't rathcr

have been before the other

Judge,

which

they recused 3

or 4 timcs, to stall,

and

that.ludge

finally

died,

that's

one

of the

reasons he became,

he had terminal canccr

and

hc dicd, and

so

this the

new

judge

also

the

head Judge, of the

whole coutrt

house,

picked

up thc

casc evcn

though

the

original

Judge

had

found

us to

be

the

injured

party,

some

how they

got rcwardcd

for

injuring

us,

and now we

have

to

pay them doesn't make

sense,

but

when

you

undcrstand,

that

their effort

to fragment the

case by

the

recusals

and

delays,

and finally

getting anothcr

Judge,

which

was

what

they

hoped fon

but he

had

to

die

because

the

rccusals didn't

work,

and

uh

it

fractured

the case, so

much

that,

ya,

they

were

able to

get

something

with

the

new

Judge

that

the

other

the

original

Judge

would

ncver have

given

them,

cause

hc

alrcady

statcd

that they had

nb

right

to those things

under

the

contract

that

was

in disputc."...

21. June

17r2015 on

Prophecy Realify

program

on

http://firstamendmcntradio.nct

starting

at

tl



16:09, Nicklas Hoffman

stated:

"I

have been

under attack for

seven

years,

oh

yes

and

I havc

to

admit,

I

got

to the

root

of

this

attack

and

it's from

those

evil

people

that

tried

to steal

my land and

destroy

me

and

they began

the

whole thing

by

enraging

other

people.

. .

it all startcd

with

going

to

the

party

and I should have

hidden

the horses

that

were in bad shape,

anyway

it

all startcd

with

the same

people

and

their

agenda

to

destroy

me and

my family and

the

work

that wc

arc

doing

here

at

any

cost

regardless

. .

.

2102:

Nicklas

Hoffman continues:

"who

do I

think

she

was

working

for?

No, I

think

she had

her

own

agenda.

The

woman they

sicced

on

me,

of

course

the they

that

sicced

hcr

on

me is

thc

cabal,

this

small cabal of

people

that

are still

attacking

me over

here. They called

the

. .

.of

course

she ha

a

horse

rescue

ranch in Tulare, not in Tulare,

Exeter

California

and she

is a liar, and she's

willing

to

bare

false

witness against

me,

so

that's the

worse

kind

of

liar,

'cause

thc commandmcnt

specifically

says

'Thou

shalt not

bear false witness

against thy

neighbor

and

she

had no

compunction about bearing

false witness

against me, and

anyway, she

workcd

lbr hcrsclf,

and

it

was a

good

event

for her

to

raise funds.

CALIFORNIA

LAW OI{ DEFAMATIOI{

OF

CHARACTER\

SLANDE,R &

LIBELCIVI

CODE SECTIOI\

43-53.7

43. Besides the

personal

rights

mentioned

or

recognized

in

the

Government

Code,

every

person

has, subiect

to the

qualifications

and

restrictions

provided

by

law,

the

right of

protection

from bodily

restraint

or

harm, from

personal

insult,

from defamation,

and

from

iniury

to

his

personal relations.

44.

Defamation

is

effected

by either

of the

following:

(a)

Libel.

(b)

Slander.

45.

Libel

is

a

false and

unprivileged

publication

by

writing,

printing,

picture,

effigy,

or othcr

fixed

representation to

the

eye, which

exposes

any

person

to

hatred, contcmpt,

ridiculc, or

obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or

avoided, or

which

has a tendcncy

to

in.iurc

him

in

his

occupation.

45a.

A

libel which

is

defamatory

of the

plaintiff

without the

necessity

of

explanatory matter,

such as

an inducement,

innuendo or

other extrinsic

fact, is

said to be a

libel on its face.

Defamatory

language

not libelous

on

its

face is

not

actionable unless

the

plaintiff

alleges and

proves

that he has suffered

special

damdge

as

a

proximate

result thereof.

Special

damage

is defined

in

Section

48a

of

this

code.

46. Slander

is

a

false and unprivileged

publication, orally

uttered,

and also

communications

by radio or

any

mechanical

or

othcr

mcans

which:

l. Charges any

person

with

crime,

or with

having

been

indicted,

convicted,

or

punished

for

crime;

2. Imputes in him the

present

existence

of an infectious,

q



contagious,

or

loathsome

disease;

3.

Tends

directly to

injure

him in respect

to his office,

profession,

trade or

business,

either by

imputing to him

general

disqualification

in

those respects

which

the office

or

other

occupation

peculiarly

requires,

or by

imputing

something

with

reference

to

his office,

profession,

trade, or business

that

has

a

natural

tendency

to

lessen

its

profits;

4.

Imputes

to

him

impotence

or

a

want

of

chastity;

or

5. Which, by natural consequence, causes

actual damage.

47. A

privileged publication

or broadcast is one

made:

(a)

In the

proper

discharge

of

an

official

duty.

(b)

In any

(1) legislative

proceeding,

(2)

judicial

proceeding,

(3)

in

any

other

official

proceeding

authorized by

law,

or

(4)

in

the

initiation or

course of any

other

proceeding

authorized

by law and

reviewable

pursuant

to Chapter

2

(commencing

with

Section

1084)

of

'I'itle

I of

Part

3 of

the

Code

of

Civil

Procedure,

except

as follows:

(1)

An allegation

or averment

contained

in any

pleading or

affidavit filed in

an

action

for

marital

dissolution or

legal

separation

made of or

concerning

a

person

by or

against

whom

no

affirmative

relief

is

prayed

in

the

action shall

not be

a

privileged

publication

or

broadcast

as to

the

person

making

the

allegation

or

averment

within the

meaning

of

this

section

unless

the

pleading

is

verified or affidavit

sworn to,

and

is made

without

malice,

by

one

having

reasonable and

probable

cause for believing

the

truth of

the

allegation

or averment

and unless the

allegation or

avermcnt

is

material

and

relevant to the

issues

in

the action.

(2)

This subdivision does not

make

privileged

any

communication

made in

furtherance

of an act of

intentional destruction

or

alteration

of

physical

evidence

undertaken

for

the purpose

of

depriving a

party

to litigation

of the

use of

that

evidence,

whether

or

not

the content of the

communication

is the subject

of

a

subsequent

publication

or

broadcast

which

is

privileged

pursuant

to

this

section. As used

in this

paragraph,

"physical

evidence"

means

cvidence

specified

in

Section

250

of the

Evidence Code

or

evidence

that is

property

of any type

specified

in Chapter 14

(commencing

with

Section 2031.010) of

Title

4

of

Part

4 of the Code of

Civil

Procedure.

(3)

This subdivision does not

make

privileged

any

communication

made in a

iudicial

proceeding

knowingly

concealing

thc

existence

of

an insurance

policy

or

policies.

(4)

A recorded

lis

pendens is

not

a

privileged publication

unless

it

identifies

an

action

previously

filed

with

a court

of

competent

jurisdiction

which

affects the

title

or

right of

possession

of

real

property,

as

authorized or

required by

law.

(c)

In

a communication,

without

malice, to

a

person intercsted

therein,

(1)

by one who is also

interested,

or

(2)

by

one

who

stands

in

such a

relation to the

person

interested

ai

to afford

a reasonable

ground

for

supposing

the motive

for the

communication

to be

10



innocent,

or

(3)

who is requested

by

the

person

interested

to

give

the

information.

This

subdivision

applies

to and

includes

a

communication

concerning

the

job

performance

or

qualifications

of an

applicant for

employment, based upon credible evidence, made

without

malice, by

a current

or

former

employer of the

applicant

to, and upon

request

of, one

whom

the

employer

reasonably

believes

is

a

prospective

employer

of the

applicant. This subdivision

authorizes

a

current

or

former

employer,

or the employer's

agent,

to

answer

whether

or not

the employer

would rehire

a

current or former

employee.

This subdivision

shall not apply

to

a communication

concerning

the speech or activities

of an

applicant

for

employment

if

the

speech

or activities

are

constitutionally

protected,

or

otherwise

protected

by

Section

527.3

of the Code

of Civil

Proccdurc

or any other

provision

of law.

(d)

(1)

By

a

fair

and true report in,

or

a

communication

to,

a

public

journal,

of

(A)

a

judicial,

(B)

legislative,

or

(C)

other

public

official

proceeding,

or

(D)

of anything said

in

the course

thereof,

or

(E)

of

a verified charge

or complaint

made

by

any

person

to

a

public official,

upon

which

complaint

a

warrant

has been issued.

(2)

Nothing in

paragraph

(1)

shall

make

privileged

any

communication

to a

public

journal

that does

any of

the

following:

(A)

Violates

Rule

5-120 of

the

State

Bar Rules of

Professional

Conduct.

(B)

Breaches

a

court

order.

(C)

Violates any

requirement

of

confidentiality

imposed

by

law.

(e)

By a

fair and

true report

of

(1)

the

proceedings

of

a

public

meeting,

if

the

meeting was lawfully

convened

for a lawful

purpose

and open to

the

public,

or

(2)

the

publication

of the

matter

complained

of was

for

the

public

benefit.

48.

In

the

case

provided

for in

subdivision

(c) of

Section

47,

malice is not

inferred from

the

communication.

48a. 1.

In any

action for damages for

the

publication

of a libel in

a

newspaper,

or

of

a

slander by radio

broadcast,

plaintiff

shall

recover no

more

than

special damages unless

a correction

be demanded

and be

not

published

or

broadcasto

as hereinafter

provided.

Plaintiff

shall

serve upon

the

publisher,

at the

place

of

publication

or

broadcaster

at the

place

of

broadcast,

a

written

notice

speciffing

the

statements claimed

to

be

libelous

and demanding

that

thg same be

corrected. Said

notice

and demand

must

be served

within

20 days

after

knowledge of the

publication

or

broadcast of the statements claimed

to be

libelous.

2. If a correction be

demanded within said

period

and bc

not

published

or

broadcast

in

substantially

as conspicuous

a

manner in

said

newspaper

or

on said

broadcasting station

as were

the

statements

claimed

to

be

libeloirs,

in a regular issue thereof

published

or

broadcast

within

three weeks

after

such service,

plaintiff,

if he

pleads

and

proves

such

notice,

demand and

failure

to correct,

and if

1.1



his

cause

of action

be maintained, may recover

general,

special

and

exemplary

damages;

provided

that

no

exemplary

damages

may

be

recovered

unless the

plaintiff

shall

prove

that

defendant

made the

publication

or broadcast

with actual

malice and then only

in

the

discretion

of the

court or

jury,

and

actual

malice shall

not

be

inferred or

presumed

from

the

publication

or

broadcast.

3.

A

correction

published

or

broadcast in

substantially

as

conspicuous

a

manner

in

said newspaper

or

on said

broadcasting

station as

the statements

claimed

in

the

complaint

to he libelous,

prior

to

receipt

of

a

demand therefor, shall

be

of the

same forcc

and

effect as though

such

correction

had been

published

or

broadcast

within

three

weeks

after

a demand

therefor.

.

4.

As used herein,

the

terms

"general

damagesr"

"special

damagesr"

"exemplary

damages" and

"actual

malicer" are defined as

follows:

(a)

"General

damages"

are

damages

for loss of

reputation,

shame,

mortification

and

hurt

feelings;

(b)

"Special

damages" are

all

damages

which

plaintiff

alleges

and

proves

that he

has

suffered in

respect

to his

property,

business,

trade,

profession

or occupation,

including

such

amounts of money

as

the

plaintiff

alleges and

proves

he has expended as

a

result

of the

alleged

libel,

and

no

otherl

(c)

"Exemplary

damages" are damages

which

may

in

the

discretion of

the

court

orjury

be recovered in

addition to

general

and special

damages for

the

sake of

example and by

way

of

punishing

a defendant

who has made the

publication

or

broadcast

with

actual

malice;

(d)

"Actual

malice"

is

that

state

of mind arising

from

hatrcd

or

ill will

toward

the

plaintiff; provided,

however,

that

such a state

of

mind

occasioned by a

good

faith

belief on the

part

of the

defendant

in

the truth

of the

libelous

publication

or

broadcast

at

the

time

it

is

published or

broadcast

shall not

constitute

actual

malice.

48.5.

(1)

The owner, licensee

or operator

of

a

visual

or

sound

radio broadcasting station

or network of

stations,

and the agents

or

cmployees

of any such owner,

licensee

or operatorrshall

not be

liable for

any damages for

any

defamatory

statement

or

matter

published

or uttered

in or

as a

part

of a

visual or

sound

radio

broadcast

by

one

other

than

such owner,

licensee

or

operator,

or

agent or

employee thereof,

if

it

shall

be

alleged and

proved

by

such

owner,

licensee

or

operator,

or

agent

or

employee

thereof,

that such

owner,

licensee

or operator, or

such agent

or

employee,

has

exercised

due care

to

prevent

the

publication

or utterance

of such

statement

or matter in

such broadcast.

(2)lt

any

defamatory

statement

or matter

is

published

or

uttered

in or as a

part

of

a broadcast

over the

facilities

of

a

network

of

visual or

sound

radio

broadcasting

stations,

the owner,

licensee or

operator

of any such

station, or network

of

'stations,

and

the agents

or

employees

thereof, other

than

the owner, licensee

or opcrator of

the station, or

nefwork

of stations, originating such

broadcast, and

12



the

agents

or

employees

thereof,

shall in

no event be liablc

for

any

damages

for

any such

defamatory

statement

or

matter.

(3)

In no

event, howcver,

shall

any owner, licensce

or

operator

of

such

station

or network

of

stations,

or the agents or employces

thereof,

be

liable

for any

damages for any

defamatory

statement

or

matter

published

or uttered,

by

one

other than

such

owner, licensee

or

operator,

or

agent

or

employee thereof,

in

or as a

part

of

a

visual or

sound

radio

broadcast

by or

on

behalfofany

candidate

for

public

office,

which

broadcast

cannot be censored

by

reason of the

provisions

of federal

statute

or

regulation

of the Federal

Communications

Commission.

(a)As

used

in this

Part 2rthe

terms

"radior"

"radio

broadcast,"

and

"broadcastr"

are

defined

to include

both visual

and sound

radio

broadcasting.

(5)

Nothing

in

this

section

contained

shall deprive

any such

owner,

licensee

or

operator,

or

the agent

or

employee

thereof,

of any

rights

under any

other

section of

this Pnrt

2.

Dated

.Iune

18,

20Ls

Melody

illesp

spre

j

G

1:l

Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez

Documents

Transcript of Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez