Lep class presentation-4-v002

11
March 9, 2015 CLASS PRESENTATION 4 Chief Food Officers

Transcript of Lep class presentation-4-v002

Page 1: Lep class presentation-4-v002

March 9, 2015

CLASS PRESENTATION 4

Chief Food

Officers

Page 2: Lep class presentation-4-v002

Agenda

Market sizing 2

Competition 1

Lessons learned 3

Page 3: Lep class presentation-4-v002

Limited Competition from Rivals and Entrants

Rivalry +  Few comparable firms +  Industry growth +  Sustainable competitive advantage

Supplier Power

+  Low concentration and low differentiation +  Potentially strong distribution channel -­‐  Strong business impact

Substitutes +  No alternatives with comparable performance

Buyer Power

+  Low concentration ±  Low switching costs +  Differential advantage

New Entrants

-­‐  Low entry barriers ±  Medium capital requirement -­‐  Global players with EoS and experience +  Scalability of our business model

Rivalry

Low

Substitutes

Low

Buyers

Low

Suppliers

Low

New Entrants

Medium Subject of further analysis

COMPETITION | MARKET SIZING | LESSONS LEARNED

Page 4: Lep class presentation-4-v002

SWOT: YUM NEXT DOOR

WEAKNESSES

-­‐  Difficulty in ensure food quality at delivery

-­‐  Customers may not see the differentiation

STRENGTHS

+  Great food variety

+  Customer relationship

+  Usability & automation

+  Leveraging network effects as first movers

+  Economies of scale

OPPORTUNITIES

+  Trend towards mobile

+  Internationalization

THREATS

-­‐  Few entrance barriers

-­‐  Entrants w/ higher performance & scalable business models

-­‐  Portuguese consumer behavior (?)

COMPETITION | MARKET SIZING | LESSONS LEARNED

Page 5: Lep class presentation-4-v002

SWOT: Food Ordering Portugal

WEAKNESSES

-­‐  Long delivery times

-­‐  Poor usability

-­‐  Little automization

-­‐  Poor variety

-­‐  Poor online marketing

STRENGTHS

+  Partnerships

+  Coverage and established customer basis

+  Brand (e.g. Telepizza)

OPPORTUNITIES

+  Leverage customer basis and partner network to go digital

THREATS

-­‐  Seasonality

-­‐  Entrants w/ higher performance & scalable business models

COMPETITION | MARKET SIZING | LESSONS LEARNED

Page 6: Lep class presentation-4-v002

SWOT: Online Food Ordering International

WEAKNESSES

-­‐  Little differentiation

-­‐  Minimum order values

STRENGTHS

+  Economies of scale

+  Global footprint

+  Partnerships & variety

+  Fast delivery

+  Mobile applications

+  Advertising

OPPORTUNITIES

+  Further internationalization

+  Further leverage advertising for growth

+  Mobile commerce growth

THREATS

-­‐  Dependence on restaurants for delivery

-­‐  High reliance on fast-food but changing consumption trends

COMPETITION | MARKET SIZING | LESSONS LEARNED

Page 7: Lep class presentation-4-v002

SWOT: Restaurant Listings Portugal

WEAKNESSES

-­‐  Only information, no transaction

-­‐  Dependence on advertising revenue

STRENGTHS

+  Broad variety of restaurants

+  Usability (customized site, filters, easy search)

+  Credibility and trust

OPPORTUNITIES

+  Online market

+  Internationalization

+  New services (online booking and ordering)

+  Consulting services for additional revenue

THREATS

-­‐  Competition, e.g.from websites offering delivery or booking

-­‐  Seasonality

COMPETITION | MARKET SIZING | LESSONS LEARNED

Page 8: Lep class presentation-4-v002

Market Sizing: Top – Down

TAM  §  CS1:  Students,  Internet  access:  351k  §  CS2:  Professionals,  18-­‐55  years,  high  educa?on,  Internet  access:  2.157  m  

SAM  §  CS1:  Students,  Internet  access:  108k  §  CS2:  Professionals,  18-­‐55  years,  high  educa?on,  Internet  access:  329k  

SOM  §  CS1:  Students,  Internet  access:  11k  §  CS2:  Professionals,  18-­‐55  years,  high  educa?on,  Internet  access:  33k  

2.5m  

437k  

44k  

COMPETITION | MARKET SIZING | LESSONS LEARNED

Geography:  Lisbon  

Market  Share:  10%  

Sources: INE, PORDATA, Census 2011

Page 9: Lep class presentation-4-v002

Market Sizing: Google Keyword Planner

COMPETITION | MARKET SIZING | LESSONS LEARNED

   Traffic Source Traffic % Telepizza (100%) Zomato (100%) Tripadvisor (25%) NoMenu (100%) Total

TAM Brand Search 40% 165,000 12,100 18,500 6,600 202,200

Direct 40% 165,000 12,100 18,500 6,600 202,200

Referral 20% 82,500 6,050 9,250 3,300 101,100

    100% 412,500 30,250 46,250 16,500 505,500

Food-related Search           4,900

Total             510,400

SAM Brand Search 40% 74,000 9,900 6,750 3,600 94,250

Direct 40% 74,000 9,900 6,750 3,600 94,250

Referral 20% 37,000 4,950 3,375 1,800 47,125

  185,000 24,750 16,875 9,000 235,625

Food-related Search           1,960

Total             237,585

Explanation §  Total: traffic on major brands and

through food-related keywords §  Portugal as TAM, Lisbon area as SAM §  Traffic % based on own assumptions

using indications from Alexa §  Search traffic estimations from Google

Keyword Planner

Page 10: Lep class presentation-4-v002

Lessons Learned

COMPETITION | MARKET SIZING | LESSONS LEARNED

§  Customers – problems - solutions

§  Hypothesis testing

§  Competitor analysis: 5 Forces & SWOT

§  Customer segmentation

§  Market sizing and traffic estimation

Page 11: Lep class presentation-4-v002

Thank you! Visit us at: catolicalisbonentrepreneurs.wordpress.com