Lehrevaluation Quality and Usability Seminar SS17 · Lehrevaluation Quality and Usability Seminar...
24
Lehrevaluation Quality and Usability Seminar SS17 Naderi, Schmidt, Zadtootaghaj, Weiss August 31, 2017 Contents 1 General questions about the course 2 1.1 I am a student of ............................. 2 1.2 I attend the course as... .......................... 2 1.3 I attend the course... ........................... 3 1.4 So far I have completed that much percent of the courses required for my degree... ................................... 3 1.5 The required knowledge was... ...................... 4 1.6 In did not have knowledge regarding: ................... 4 1.7 The proportion of the appointments I was present is approximately ... .. 5 1.8 I was not always present, because: .................... 5 1.9 The weekly expenditure of time i required for this course in addition to lectures and excercises is approximately ... ................. 6 1.10 Compared with other courses this course was... ............. 6 2 Theoretical part / Course 7 2.1 The amount of content to learn in this course was... ........... 7 2.2 The pace of the lecture was... ....................... 7 2.3 The course gave me an actual overview of the topic. .......... 8 2.4 The lecturer could raise interest in the topic. ............... 8 2.5 Everything was presented in an understandable way ........... 9 2.6 Interdisciplinary connections were obvious. ................ 9 2.7 Questions were answered in an understandable way . ........... 10 2.8 Examples helped to understand. ..................... 10 2.9 The practical relevance of the substance was recognizable. ....... 11 2.10 The use of media (computer presentation, blackboard, slide images) was adequate. .................................. 11 3 Practical part 12 3.1 The level of the exercises was... ...................... 12 3.2 The exercises built on the lecture. .................... 12 3.3 The exercises helped to understand the subject. ............. 13 3.4 I actively participated in the group work. ................. 13 4 Practical part / Support 14 4.1 The tutor was well skilled in the topic. .................. 14 4.2 Questions were answered by the tutor in an understandable way . .... 14 5 Practical part / Discussion 15 5.1 Discussions helped to understand the subject. .............. 15 6 Practical part / Independent work 16 6.1 The assessments were understandable. .................. 16 1
Transcript of Lehrevaluation Quality and Usability Seminar SS17 · Lehrevaluation Quality and Usability Seminar...
Lehrevaluation Quality and Usability Seminar SS17
Naderi, Schmidt, Zadtootaghaj, Weiss
August 31, 2017
Contents
1 General questions about the course 21.1 I am a student of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.2 I attend the course as... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.3 I attend the course... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.4 So far I have completed that much percent of the courses required for my
degree... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.5 The required knowledge was... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41.6 In did not have knowledge regarding: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41.7 The proportion of the appointments I was present is approximately... . . 51.8 I was not always present, because: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51.9 The weekly expenditure of time i required for this course in addition to
lectures and excercises is approximately... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61.10 Compared with other courses this course was... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2 Theoretical part / Course 72.1 The amount of content to learn in this course was... . . . . . . . . . . . 72.2 The pace of the lecture was... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72.3 The course gave me an actual overview of the topic. . . . . . . . . . . 82.4 The lecturer could raise interest in the topic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82.5 Everything was presented in an understandable way . . . . . . . . . . . 92.6 Interdisciplinary connections were obvious. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92.7 Questions were answered in an understandable way. . . . . . . . . . . . 102.8 Examples helped to understand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102.9 The practical relevance of the substance was recognizable. . . . . . . . 112.10 The use of media (computer presentation, blackboard, slide images) was
adequate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3 Practical part 123.1 The level of the exercises was... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123.2 The exercises built on the lecture. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123.3 The exercises helped to understand the subject. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133.4 I actively participated in the group work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4 Practical part / Support 144.1 The tutor was well skilled in the topic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144.2 Questions were answered by the tutor in an understandable way. . . . . 14
5 Practical part / Discussion 155.1 Discussions helped to understand the subject. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6 Practical part / Independent work 166.1 The assessments were understandable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1
7 Test 177.1 I am planning the following time for exam preparation: . . . . . . . . . 177.2 For the exams I am learning in a group. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8 Course Summary 188.1 The presented topics were consistent with the courses description. . . . 188.2 The goals of this course were... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188.3 They were recognizable/ not recognizable, because: . . . . . . . . . . . 198.4 The accompanying material (book, script, . . . ) was... . . . . . . . . . . 198.5 The accompanying material was helpful/ not helpful, because: . . . . . 198.6 The following topics should be discussed more extensively: . . . . . . . 198.7 The following topics should be discussed less extensively: . . . . . . . . 198.8 I liked particularly: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198.9 I disliked particularly: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208.10 I believe that the topics are useful for my future study / work. . . . . . 208.11 Further comments or requests: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208.12 Following this course, my interest in this subject: . . . . . . . . . . . . 218.13 My interest increased/ decreased because: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218.14 Compared to other courses the quality of this course was... . . . . . . . 228.15 I would recommend this course. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228.16 I would recommend/ not recommend this course, because: . . . . . . . 228.17 Further comments: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238.18 My overall impression of the course: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238.19 Is there something important that was not asked in this survey? . . . . 23
2
1 General questions about the course
1.1 I am a student of
Other (0)
Informatik Ma. (3)
Tech. Inf. Ma. (1)
Kommunikation und Sprache Ma. (1)
Medieninformatik (1)
1.2 I attend the course as...
elective subject (5)
compulsory subject (1)
3
1.3 I attend the course...
Other
because it was recommended to me
because my friends also attend it
because i need a Certificate of Achievements ('Schein')
because of the lecturer
because of special interest in the topic
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
• Brauch nen Seminar
1.4 So far I have completed that much percent of the coursesrequired for my degree...
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
%
4
1.5 The required knowledge was...
completely present not present
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1.6 In did not have knowledge regarding:
• Most of the topics but that was the idea of the seminar.
• Linux, konkrete Algorithmen und statistische Verfahren
• Keine wirklichen Kenntnisse notig.
5
1.7 The proportion of the appointments I was present is approxi-mately...
90 92 94 96 98 100
%
1.8 I was not always present, because:
• Presentation dates
• Krankheit
6
1.9 The weekly expenditure of time i required for this course inaddition to lectures and excercises is approximately...
4 6 8 10 12 14
h
1.10 Compared with other courses this course was...
less work−intensive equal more work−intensive
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
7
2 Theoretical part / Course
2.1 The amount of content to learn in this course was...
too much appropriate too small
0
1
2
3
4
2.2 The pace of the lecture was...
too fast appropriate too slow
0
1
2
3
4
5
8
2.3 The course gave me an actual overview of the topic.
yes partially no
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2.4 The lecturer could raise interest in the topic.
almost always almost never
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
9
2.5 Everything was presented in an understandable way
almost always almost never
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2.6 Interdisciplinary connections were obvious.
almost always almost never
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
10
2.7 Questions were answered in an understandable way.
almost always almost never
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.8 Examples helped to understand.
almost always almost never
0
1
2
3
4
11
2.9 The practical relevance of the substance was recognizable.
almost always almost never
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2.10 The use of media (computer presentation, blackboard, slideimages) was adequate.
almost always almost never
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
12
3 Practical part
3.1 The level of the exercises was...
too high appropriate too low
0
1
2
3
4
3.2 The exercises built on the lecture.
almost always almost never
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
13
3.3 The exercises helped to understand the subject.
almost always almost never
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.4 I actively participated in the group work.
almost always almost never
0
1
2
3
4
14
4 Practical part / Support
4.1 The tutor was well skilled in the topic.
almost always almost never
0
1
2
3
4
5
4.2 Questions were answered by the tutor in an understandableway.
almost always almost never
0
1
2
3
4
5
15
5 Practical part / Discussion
5.1 Discussions helped to understand the subject.
almost always almost never
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
16
6 Practical part / Independent work
6.1 The assessments were understandable.
almost always almost never
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
17
7 Test
7.1 I am planning the following time for exam preparation:
●
0 5 10 15 20
h
7.2 For the exams I am learning in a group.
almost always almost never
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
18
8 Course Summary
8.1 The presented topics were consistent with the courses de-scription.
completely not at all
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
8.2 The goals of this course were...
recognizable partially recognizable not recognizable
0
1
2
3
4
19
8.3 They were recognizable/ not recognizable, because:
• Because they were stated since the beginning of the course
• Ich glaube die Lernziele haben sich im Laufe der Veranstaltung geandert. Ich dachte,dass wir tatsachlich Synthese betreiben werden. Allerdings haben wir wochenlangdamit verbracht MARYTTS zum Laufen zu bringen. Das war teilweise sehr frustri-erend.
8.4 The accompanying material (book, script, . . . ) was...
helpful partially helpful not helpful
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
8.5 The accompanying material was helpful/ not helpful, because:
• No learning material provided
• Teilweise geht Taylor zu sehr ins Detail, ohne die Grundideen verstandlich zu erklaren(vgl. Kapitel 15). Das ist aber stark vom Kapitel abhangig. Manche sind ganz gut.
8.6 The following topics should be discussed more extensively:
• No Content
8.7 The following topics should be discussed less extensively:
• well being / fun and enjoyment
8.8 I liked particularly:
• serious games / rewards/ user classification / GAP analysis
• Der Dozent war flexibel und hat die Aufgaben entsprechend des Feedbacks derTeilnehmer angepasst.
• Die Kombination der Praxis und Theorie. Man lernt wie das Bauen eine Stimmefunktioniert und fuhrt dies auch Praktisch durch.
20
8.9 I disliked particularly:
• N/A
• Nicht gut organisiert bzw. nicht ausreichend durchdacht.
• Installierung des benotigten Programms war ein krampf.
8.10 I believe that the topics are useful for my future study /work.
yes partially no
0
1
2
3
4
5
8.11 Further comments or requests:
• N/A
• Falls ein TTS Seminar wiederholt wird, ware es evtl. gunstiger MARYTTS in denComputer Pools vorzuinstallieren und dann wirklich in die Tiefe zu gehen.
21
8.12 Following this course, my interest in this subject:
increased not influenced reduced
0
1
2
3
4
8.13 My interest increased/ decreased because:
• It increased because it’s a current trend in the industry today.
• Es ist verstandlich und Interessant. Der Scope lasst sich beliebig verandern. Es lasstsich wenn notig beliebig weit ins detail gehen. Zudem ist das Grundverstandnis auchkein Hexenwerk.
22
8.14 Compared to other courses the quality of this course was...
higher equal lower
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
8.15 I would recommend this course.
yes partially no
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
8.16 I would recommend/ not recommend this course, because:
• N/A
23
• s.o.
• Spannend und es fuhlt sich nicht nach Arbeit an, diesen Kurs zu besuchen.
8.17 Further comments:
• N/A
8.18 My overall impression of the course:
very good very bad
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
8.19 Is there something important that was not asked in thissurvey?
• N/A
24
