Learning in Art Museums: Engagement With Art

download Learning in Art Museums: Engagement With Art

If you can't read please download the document

  • date post

  • Category


  • view

  • download


Embed Size (px)


Part of a panel at AERA 2013 on Learning in Art Museum. Other panelists were: Betsy DiSalvo, Georgia Tech, Karen Knutson, UPCLOSE at U. Pittsburgh, and Sarah Schultz, Walker Art Center with Palmyre Pierroux as Discussant.

Transcript of Learning in Art Museums: Engagement With Art

  • 1. Learning in Art Museums: Engagement With Art Maria Mortati Independent Exhibit Developer San Francisco, CA | AERA 2013

2. FORMALInteractive Galleries, Contemporary Wing, Baltimore Museum of ArtCenter for Creative Connections, Dallas Museum of ArtChildrens Creativity MuseumFort Collins Museum of Discovery 3. INFORMALThe Great Calculation, Exhibit & EventsThe Giant Hand Machine Project @ The Hammer MuseumThe San Francisco Mobile MuseumDesire Trails Public Program, Headlands Center for the Arts 4. Museum experience Vatican MuseumMuseum experience Open Field at the WalkerMuseum experience Experiments in Engagement 5. Engagement Platforms at Art Museums Through the art and artistsWith the art or collections Civically Engaged Participatory Art Center for Creative Connections, Dallas Museum of Art Interactive galleries at the Baltimore Museum of Art Queens Museum and art projects that address local social and political issues (Tania Bruguera) Participatory Art Open Field at the Walker Art Center, Portland Art Museums Shine a Light Socially Practice projects 6. Dallas Museum of ArtTHE CENTER FOR CREATIVE CONNECTIONS (C3) 7. C3 is a 12,000 sq ft dedicated space for different types of participation. It was about working an institutions content in multiple ways. 8. Gallery as Lab: we went back to the original statement and interpreted it as the theme 9. What they bring to the table: The Framework for Engaging Art Observers Are somewhat comfortable looking at art, have the most limited backgrounds in art and art history, least comfortable talking about art. They tend to prefer a guided experience at the museum, may be new to art viewing and just beginning to experience it. Participants Stronger knowledge of and interest in art. Enjoy learning and the social aspects of their experiences and have strong interest in connecting with works of art in a variety of ways, including through music, dance, dramatic performances, and readings. Independents Individuals in this group like to view a work of art independently, without explanations or interpretation. These visitorsare confident about their knowledge and seek intense interactions with art. Independents are often practicing artists. The group is less likely to use interpretative resources during their visit. Enthusiasts Are confident, enthusiastic, knowledgeable and comfortable looking at all types of art. These visitors actively participate in a wide variety of museum programming, they are the most emotionally affected by art, and are most interested in the artist materials and techniques, and in explaining the meaning of a work to a friend. They frequently use the museum and are most likely to be members. 10. Irvine Foundation ReportSource: Getting In On the Act, Understanding Participatory Arts Practices 11. Initial Definitions of Visitor Activity in C3 As we begin to think of how to define a spectrum for activity, we could consider in this way: Responding to a prompt or question about a work of art Reflecting on a work of art in an active way: visitor makes or does something that mimics or reflects the idea of an artwork Inventing something inspired by a C3 prompt or by simply having the environment and tools to do so 11/14/11C3#3 Concept Phase Interim Presentation11 12. What outcomes do we want to have? Engagement with art, its ideas and the cultural community surrounding our visitors and museum. How can we put ourselves in the position of addressing the relevance of an object in our contemporary world? 13. Exhibit Planning Outline1. Select a variety of objects that offer deep engagement 2. Use of an object's inherent entry points: and develop interactives tailored to them 3. Variety of activities for our demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, learning styles, FEA) 4. Modular exhibit approach with a gallery layout revised to mesh architecture with activity 5. Connect to current events in the contemporary world 14. Object vs. Theme-based Methodology 15. An Emerging Spatial Language 16. A new criteria for selecting objects emerges: 1. Ripe for visitor engagement fosters curiosity depth: potential for rich content breadth: allows for entry points across a diverse audience potential for community interaction connects with the contemporary world today lets us play with the subjectivity of art 2. Diverse across the Museum Collection showcases the diversity of the collection 3. Diverse across the Gallery there are visual dynamics amongst all works of art at any given time 4. Able to be on loan for an adequate period of time 17. New Contemporary Wing - Interactive GalleriesBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART 18. Interactives & Conceptual Art This is a place where art museums battle participation- where there can be an outright rejection of participation. These projects highlight the potential and problems of such an approach. 19. Starting with Spatial EvaluationTwo new galleries: one a hallway to an elevator, the other, a small space off the atrium yet prominently featured in the architecture of the wing, flanked by the main galleries 20. Gallery 1: Open Studio This gallery became a space that explored the creative practice of a single artist through a variety of media, activities, and programs The artist we were opening with was Sarah Oppenheimer, who was producing a large, permanent installation that transected the entire wing of the museum. 21. Sarah Oppenheimer, W-120301, 2012 22. Sarah Oppenheimer, W-120301, 2012 23. Sarah Oppenheimer drawings 24. Research into the artists influences 25. Hands-on prototypes to get at the essence of playing with the grid of a building 26. Sketchbooks to let visitors try the artists approach on, surrounded by other contextual materials. 27. Gallery 2: The Big Table Initially, this gallery was going to be where visitors could dive deep and engage with the concept of one work of art and one artist. Things dont always work out as planned. 28. We began with a work in the collection that could fit in the gallery, and have a visual in it that would provide a hook for visitors to play with.Mel Bochner, Optic Chiasma 29. Front-end prototyping and evaluation 30. Magnet Activity Engaged for a few minutes and went to other activity Used the magnets to stack, slide, but not exclusively to mimic the painting Visitors looked at the work of art while completing the activity Liked that the activity was interactive Did not understand the connection between the questions and activity 31. Drawing Activity High dwell time Worked socially or in isolation Drawings were varied and arrangements were varied Visitors liked seeing what other visitors had drawn, and those drawings were also a helpful indication that they were allowed to sit and draw in the Museum. Visitors did not approach, and/or look at the work of art, although a few interviewees later said they noticed it. 32. Drawing Activity, #2Worked out the conceptual and physical issues around space and perspective, and allowing visitors to move the pieces around, while keeping the drawing element front and center. 33. Starting Over 34. Working with a concept across contemporary art, vs. a work of art Finding local experts to collaborate with and realize the visionBaltimore Museum of Art 35. Baltimore Museum of Art and Post Typography 36. Pages deep letterform drawings 37. What do you think the possibilities are for children, art, and museum experiences?THANK YOU. MARIA@MORTATI.COM WWW.MORTATI.COM