Lean Six Sigma Group Lean Six Sigma Define Phase Tollgate Review.
Lean Six Sigma Management Orientation
-
Upload
ashton-conway -
Category
Documents
-
view
32 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Lean Six Sigma Management Orientation
1
Lean Six Sigma Management Orientation
Linda Lyons –Director, Center for University Learning & KSU’s Customer Service Champion
Victor Kane – KSU Associate Professor Department of Mathematics and Statistics
2
Orientation Overview
• Customer Service Initiative• What is Lean Six Sigma?• Origin of Lean Six Sigma• Employee Training • Project Essentials• Supervisor’s Role for Successful Projects• Process Improvement Organizational Model• Quality Awards Focused on Process Improvement
3
Customer Service State Initiative
In 2006, Governor Sonny Perdue launched the “Customer Service Improvement” initiative to assist in achieving the goal of making Georgia the best-managed state in the country.
It was the Governor’s desire that this initiative serve as both a catalyst and a vehicle to create a change in our culture towards providing better customer service across all areas of service in the state.
4
The Governor’s initiative is anchored in five commitments to our customers:
HelpfulCourteousAccessibleResponsiveKnowledgeable
5
• In coordination with the Governor's Customer Service Initiative, Chancellor Davis mandated that every USG campus is to implement a plan for improving customer service.
• Each institution has Customer Service Champion to manage/promote the Governor’s initiative.
• Plans are developed each FY with identified units.
• Outline clear and measurable ways to track the campus' progress toward improved customer service.
6
BOR’S STRATEGIC PLAN: Goal Six: Increase efficiency, working as a SystemChallenge:The USG will implement systematic process improvement efforts across the campuses in order to promote effectiveness.
Action:Establish a process improvement initiative
Activities for Implementation:• Implement a Lean Six Sigma training program• Implement process improvement efforts.
7
KSU Customer Service Mission
Kennesaw State University is dedicated to providing top customer service to our students and other KSU
constituents by diligently listening to our customers’ concerns, being proficient and knowledgeable in our
job duties, and demonstrating a willingness to go above the customers’ expectations when addressing
customers’ issues and interests.
8
KSU Customer Service Initiative
KSU-focused programs and activities include:Customer Service Improvement Program - LSSCustomer Service Training/Certificate ProgramCustomer Service CouncilCustomer Service Inspector Program (CSI)Shining Star Award ProgramChancellors/ Governors Award Program NominationsAnnual KSU Customer Service Recognition Luncheon
9
KSU Unit Participation
The following units at Kennesaw have participated in the CS Improvement Program:
The Office of Student Financial Aid – FY “07 “, “09”, “10”Business Services and KSU Bookstore – FY “08”Continuing Education – FY “09”Plant Operations/ Facilities - FY “10”Office of the Registrar - FY “10”
10
KSU Awards/Recognitions
The following units at Kennesaw have participated in the CS Improvement Program:
The Office of Student Financial Aid – FY “07 “, “09”, “10”Business Services and KSU Bookstore – FY “08”Continuing Education – FY “09”Plant Operations/ Facilities - FY “10”Office of the Registrar - FY “10”
Chancellor’s Customer Service Awards 2007
Outstanding Customer Service Institution of the Year Outstanding Customer Service Leadership Gold Award – Linda Lyons Outstanding Customer Service Improvement Gold Award – Coles College of Business Outstanding Customer Service Improvement Silver Award – New Hires Online Project
2008 Outstanding Customer Service Institution of the Year Joseph Greene Champion of the Year Award – Linda Lyons Outstanding Customer Service Improvement Bronze Award – KSU Bookstore Outstanding Customer Service Individual Bronze Award – Dr. Charles Aust Outstanding Customer Service Team Bronze Award – Enrollment Services Communication Center
2009 Outstanding Customer Service Leadership Award - Honorable Mention – Kim West, KSU Registrar Outstanding Customer Service Team Gold Award – KSU’s Customer Service Council
11
KSU Awards/Recognitions
The following units at Kennesaw have participated in the CS Improvement Program:
The Office of Student Financial Aid – FY “07 “, “09”, “10”Business Services and KSU Bookstore – FY “08”Continuing Education – FY “09”Plant Operations/ Facilities - FY “10”Office of the Registrar - FY “10”
Chancellor’s Customer Service Awards 2007
Outstanding Customer Service Institution of the Year Outstanding Customer Service Leadership Gold Award – Linda Lyons Outstanding Customer Service Improvement Gold Award – Coles College of Business Outstanding Customer Service Improvement Silver Award – New Hires Online Project
2008 Outstanding Customer Service Institution of the Year Joseph Greene Champion of the Year Award – Linda Lyons Outstanding Customer Service Improvement Bronze Award – KSU Bookstore Outstanding Customer Service Individual Bronze Award – Dr. Charles Aust Outstanding Customer Service Team Bronze Award – Enrollment Services Communication Center
2009 Outstanding Customer Service Leadership Award - Honorable Mention – Kim West, KSU Registrar Outstanding Customer Service Team Gold Award – KSU’s Customer Service Council
Governor’s Commendation for Customer Service Excellence 2008
Kennesaw State University Linda Lyons, Director, Center for University Learning The Office of Student Financial Aid
2009 Linda Lyons, ,Director, Center for University Learning Dr. Theresa Johnston, Director of Collegiate Recovery Center
2010 Dr. Michael Sanseviro, Interim Dean, Student Success and Director of Residence Life
12
13
QUESTIONS?
14
What is Lean Six Sigma?
• Definition – Lean Six Sigma is an improvement methodology for reducing cost through improving products and services related to customer satisfaction.
• Observation – the methodology used in Lean Six Sigma is not new, but a disciplined evolution of approaches used in Quality Control during the 20th century.
15
Why Consider Lean Six Sigma?
• Jack Welch – CEO GE (1981-2001) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNMULFcLuIM
“I see a Six Sigma company as a company whose management understands that variation is evil….”
• Ewy and Gmitro (2009) “Process Management in Education”
http://www.asq.org/quality-press/display-item/index.pl?item=E1352
“Six Sigma is a process improvement methodology used by process managers to create breakthrough improvements.”
16
Origin of Lean Six SigmaStart Year Author(s) Label Unique Characteristics
1920s Shewhart SPC Process Monitoring by Statistical Process Control 1926+ Juran Top management is responsible for quality, improvement
projects, Pareto principle, etc. 1947+ Deming 14
Points Many lectures in Japan addressing: 1) management responsibility 2) understanding variation
1949 Ohno TPS Toyota Production System (forerunner of Lean); uses Kaizen teams, JIT inventory, flows, waste elimination & cycle time reduction
1950+ Taguchi Robust Design
Developed methods to make product and process designs more robust to outside influences.
1950 JUSE Deming Prize
Award for best quality companies; Administered by Japanese Union of Scientists and Engineers
1951 Figenbaum TQC Total Quality Control: uses company-wide approach of methods from Deming, Juran, Cosby & Ishikawa
Six Sigma Tool/Process Lean Six Sigma Tools/Process
17
Six Sigma BeginsStart Year Author(s) Label Unique Characteristics 1962 Ishikawa QC
Circles Quality Control Circles in Japan – employee groups working on improvements using 7 statistical tools
1979 Crosby Quality is Free book established concepts zero defects goal & cost of nonconformance is large
1980 NBC White Paper
Television documentary “If Japan Can, Why Can’t We?” featured Deming and launched American quality revolution. Many Deming lectures followed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHvnIm9UEoQ
1984 U.S. Navy TQM Total Quality Management company-wide approach to quality: uses Deming, Juran, Crosby & Ishikawa ideas. Based on many TQC principles. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pd_uRGy5RKY
1987 Bill Smith Six Sigma
Motorola CEO Bob Galvin launches Six Sigma program. DMAIC problem solving addressing defects and variability using projects involving small teams focusing on internal processes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxCeeUqrfs4
Video Links: 1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHvnIm9UEoQ 2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pd_uRGy5RKY 3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxCeeUqrfs4
18
Lean Six Sigma BeginsStart Year Author(s) Label Unique Characteristics 1988 Motorola wins MBNQA 1988 Krafcik Lean Sloan article “Triumph of the Lean Production System” based on
TPS principles. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQspf3q12mo
1993 Allied Signal (Honeywell) CEO Larry Bossidy launches SS program 1996 GE CEO Jack Welch launches SS program Mid
1990+ Lean
Six Sigma
Companies such as Allied Signal and Maytag combined two improvement approaches TPS and Six Sigma.
1999 NIST MBNQA added Education and Health Care categories 2001 U. of WI
Stout Wins MBNQA in Education Category, graduate (8,000 students)
http://www.baldrige.nist.gov/PDF_files/UWStout_Application_Summary.pdf
2005 Richland College
Wins MBNQA in Education Category, 2 year (3500 students) http://www.baldrige.nist.gov/PDF_files/Richland_College_Application_Summary.pdf
Links: 1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQspf3q12mo 2) http://www.baldrige.nist.gov/PDF_files/UWStout_Application_Summary.pdf 3) http://www.baldrige.nist.gov/PDF_files/Richland_College_Application_Summary.pdf
19
Key Elements of Lean Six Sigma
1) Cost and Service Improvement Focus2) Process Based Analysis with DMAIC 3) Project Based Organization4) Team Oriented with Employee Training Levels• White, Yellow, Green, Black Belt• Master Black Belt, Champion
4) Data Driven with Key Measures Defined5) Customer Satisfaction Measures
20
Key Lean Six Sigma Tools
1) DMAIC Problem Solving ProcessDefine→Measure⇄Analyze→Improve→Control2) Data Analysis (7 basic statistical tools)3) Process Mapping with Flows of Everything4) Process Monitoring and Capability5) Team Discussion Methods (7 team tools)6) Many Statistical Methods7) Lean flow and Cycle Time Focus
21
Six Sigma Assumptions
• All work is accomplished using a process.• Every process has inputs (X’s) with outputs
(Y’s) which relate to customer satisfaction.• Every process has value-added activities that
transform X’s to Y’s. The goal of a project is to discover the critical X’s and optimize them to obtain the best level of Y’s.
22
Process Flowchart Basics• Six Sigma principle: All work in an organization is performed in
a process. See video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6Aqg7CKRa8
• Consequence: After defining targeted measures to improve, the first step in improvement is detailed definition of processes.
Start
InputsData or Information
Value-Added Activity - 1
MCustomer
Satisfaction
M=MeasuresProcess performance metricsCounts, times, measures
Value-Added Activity – 2A Outputs End
Value-Added Activity – 2B
Customer Use
MM
M
M
AlternatePath
Step 1Correct
?Y
Rework
M
M
23
Process Map ExamplePurchase Balsa
Airplane
Unwrap package without damaging any part.
Find Possible Sources of
Different Brand ofBalsa Airplanes
Inventory Parts per Instructions orSelf-Developed
Checklist
Checklist of Parts
All Parts Present?N
Assemble Tail Wing and Rudder
Y
Assemble Main Wing
X1=Fuselage
Weight KIV
Test Flight ok?
N
End
KIV'sX2=Main Wing Center PositionX3=Tail Wing Center PositionX4=Distance from Nose to Front of Main WingX5=Total Assembled Weight
Measure Y1=Distance
Y2=TimeY
CTQ Variables in Bold
24
Common Six Sigma Metrics
1) Defects per Time Period ( Items not correct the first time)2) First Time Through - % of products/services with no changes,
adjustments, etc.3) Rework - % of units in that require some change4) Cycle Time – time required to complete a process5) Wait Time – time customer waits for service6) Yield – number units entering process versus number exiting
25
Lean Six Sigma Improvement Strategies
1) Defect Focus – what is not done right the first time?2) Process Definition Analysis and Simplification3) Find and Optimize Process Key Measures that
impact defects & customer satisfaction. Reduce variation. Cost improvement is an outcome.
4) Rationalize Flows of Material & Information (Lean)5) Standardize Work Methods (Lean)6) Error Proof Process Steps 7) Benchmark Similar Processes
26
KSU Training for CSI
• White Belt (6 hours)
Identifying Improvement Opportunities Using Lean Six Sigma (DMAIC) Variability Reduction Identifying Customers Teamwork Essentials
• Yellow Belt (18 hours)
Business Process Reengineering DMAIC Phases Simple Statistical Tools
27
CSI Learning to Date
• Defining a useful project is the most important step in DMAIC.
• A process map can be difficult when processes are not systematically defined.
• Data in a usable form is usually not available on how a process is performing.
• Trained personnel cannot work in a vacuum and be successful. They will need team member support.
• Periodic supervisor updates are motivating.
28
Project Essentials
•Define is the first step in DMAIC. This is the most difficult phase. It is said that a “Well defined problem is half solved”.• To assist in project definition a Project Charter can be used. Template:
http://www.6sigma.us/user/Six%20Sigma%20Project%20Charter%20Template%20v1.doc
• Key elements to start a project definition:1) Practical problem description and measures2) Objective – What does success look like?3) Scope with organizational boundaries4) Time commitment authorized for each team member5) Schedule for updates
29
Supervisory Roles
1) Select Right People for Training2) Identify Area Needing Improvement3) Brainstorm Key Measures (e.g., processing time,
rework time, number of complaints/calls, etc.)4) Review Team Membership to Ensure Needed
Skills and Interfaces are Represented.5) Set Boundaries for Project Activity6) Brainstorm Benchmarking Opportunities7) Meet with Team Periodically
30
Organizational Perspective
• What is the “Big Picture”?• What are interrelationships?
Process Management Improvement System – DMAICTeam-Based Improvement StrategyData Based Key MeasuresCustomer Focus, etc.
• Is there a model to represent how the entire organization might function?
31
1Leadership
2Strategic Planning
3Customer
and Market Focus
6 Process
Management
5 Human Resource
Focus
7Organizational
Results
4Measurement, Analysis, and Knowledge Management
Organizational Profile:Environment, Relationships, and Challenges
Criteria Framework: A Systems Perspective
32
Historical Perspective
o Baldrige established in 1987 to recognize U.S. organizations for quality and performance achievements
o Established as a diagnostic tool for self- and third-party assessments
o 70+ nations have Baldrige-based award processeso 40 states have Baldrige-based award processeso Initial focus was on the manufacturing industryo Currently many sectors: business, industry, government,
EDUCATION, healthcare, and nonprofito Video: http://www.baldrige.nist.gov/Video/Getting_Results/index.html
33
Baldrige Education Winners
• Baldrige has adapted Performance Criteria to education. http://www.quality.nist.gov/Education_Criteria.htm
• U. Of Wisconsin – Stout : Wins MBNQA (2001) , graduate (8,000 students)
http://www.baldrige.nist.gov/PDF_files/UWStout_Application_Summary.pdf
• Richland College – Dallas, Texas: Wins MBNQA (2005), 2 year (3500 students)
http://www.baldrige.nist.gov/PDF_files/Richland_College_Application_Summary.pdf
34
Baldrige and Lean Six Sigma
It must be emphasized that NO specific process improvement system is required by Baldrige criteria. A relevant criteria question is:
6.2 Work Processes: How do you design, manage, and improve your key organizational work processes?
Note 2 states: “… your organization might implement approaches such as PDCA…ISO standards, Six Sigma, or Lean….”
Application of criteria to smaller organizations requires flexibility.
35
Baldrige Validated Criteria- 89 QuestionsSome Validation Evidence
• Benefits compared to social cost exceed 207:1 - A. N. Link and J.T. Scott (2006) , “An Economic Evaluation of the Baldrige National Quality Program,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15, 83-100.
• Award winners significantly outperformed control group (38-46%) – K. B. Hendricks and V. R. Singhal (2001), “The Long-Run Stock Price Performance of Firms with Effective TQM Programs,” Management Sciences, 47, 359-368.
• Award winners outperformed control group on operating income (48%) - K. B. Hendricks and V. R. Singhal (1997), “Does Implementing an Effective TQM Program Actually Improve Operating Performance? …,” Management Sciences, 43, 1258-1274.
• Baldrige winners were better than control group by a factor of 2 on key financial measures.- K. B. Hendricks and V. R. Singhal (1999), “The Financial Rewards from TQM,” American Ceramic Society Bulletin, 78, 89-93.
• TQM and superior financial results were found to covary. K. M. York and C. E. Miree (2004), “Causation or Covariation: an Empirical Re-examination of the Link Between TQM and Financial Performance,” Journal of Operations Management 22 (2004) 291–311
• 1994-2003 award recipients underperformed S&P 500 by -18% to +36% from announcement date to December 2004. MBNQA Website.
• Up to 2001 Award winners beat S&P 500 returns by 300-600% (8 years), This trend was reversed in 2002 and 2003, the last years studied. http://baldrige.nist.gov/Stock_Studies.htm.
36
Summary – Performance Excellence and Lean Six Sigma
• Jim Collins in Good to Great (2001) analyzes 11 great companies selected based on stock performance. His team found 6 concepts that made them unique. One concept “a culture of discipline” describes several Baldrige/TQM-like characteristics.
• Clearly, there is no agreement on everything organizations should do to achieve Greatness or Performance Excellence.
• Criteria have slight annual changes to reflect best practices. Inputs vary- Enron Scandal (2001): Ethical Behavior in Leadership- Hurricane Katrina (2005): Disaster Planning
• Some common themes related to Lean Six Sigma in most approaches are:- Customer Focused Products and Services- Process Model for Value-Added Work Activity- Continuous Improvement of Processes- Data-Based Decision Making
• Lean Six Sigma is a useful approach that supports most models for superior organizational performance.
What is Georgia Oglethorpe Award Process, Inc.?• Public-private partnership (1997)
Mission – Leading Georgia’s Organizations
to Improve Performance
Vision – Georgia Outperforming the World!• Modeled after the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria and Award Process
http://www.georgiaoglethorpe.org/
38
Georgia Focus Recognition
Step 1
Georgia Progress Award
Step 2
Georgia Oglethorpe Award
Step 3
Three Step Process
Maturity andRecognitionOptions
Baldrige Award(For those eligible.)
39
Thank You!!
May your processes be productive and satisfy your customers….