Leadership

21
o r g a n i z a t i o n a l b e h a v i o r stephen p. robbins e l e v e n t h e d i t i o n

description

 

Transcript of Leadership

Page 1: Leadership

o r g a n i z a t i o n a l b e h a v i o r

o r g a n i z a t i o n a l b e h a v i o r

stephen p. robbins

e l e v e n t h e d i t i o n

e l e v e n t h e d i t i o n

Page 2: Leadership

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIORORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIORS T E P H E N P. R O B B I N SS T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S

E L E V E N T H E D I T I O NE L E V E N T H E D I T I O N

W W W . P R E N H A L L . C O M / R O B B I N SW W W . P R E N H A L L . C O M / R O B B I N S© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook

PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook

Chapter 11Chapter 11

Basic Approaches to Leadership

Page 3: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–3

What Is Leadership?What Is Leadership?

Leadership

The ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals.

Management

Use of authority inherent in designated formal rank to obtain compliance from organizational members.

Page 4: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–4

Trait TheoriesTrait Theories

Leadership TraitsLeadership Traits::

• Ambition and energyAmbition and energy

• The desire to leadThe desire to lead

• Honest and integrityHonest and integrity

• Self-confidenceSelf-confidence

• IntelligenceIntelligence

• High self-monitoringHigh self-monitoring

• Job-relevant Job-relevant knowledgeknowledge

Leadership TraitsLeadership Traits::

• Ambition and energyAmbition and energy

• The desire to leadThe desire to lead

• Honest and integrityHonest and integrity

• Self-confidenceSelf-confidence

• IntelligenceIntelligence

• High self-monitoringHigh self-monitoring

• Job-relevant Job-relevant knowledgeknowledge

Traits Theories of Leadership

Theories that consider personality, social, physical, or intellectual traits to differentiate leaders from nonleaders.

Page 5: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–5

Trait TheoriesTrait Theories

LimitationsLimitations::

• No universal traits found that predict No universal traits found that predict leadership in all situations.leadership in all situations.

• Traits predict behavior better in “weak” Traits predict behavior better in “weak” than “strong” situations.than “strong” situations.

• Unclear evidence of the cause and effect Unclear evidence of the cause and effect of relationship of leadership and traits.of relationship of leadership and traits.

• Better predictor of the appearance of Better predictor of the appearance of leadership than distinguishing effective leadership than distinguishing effective and ineffective leaders.and ineffective leaders.

LimitationsLimitations::

• No universal traits found that predict No universal traits found that predict leadership in all situations.leadership in all situations.

• Traits predict behavior better in “weak” Traits predict behavior better in “weak” than “strong” situations.than “strong” situations.

• Unclear evidence of the cause and effect Unclear evidence of the cause and effect of relationship of leadership and traits.of relationship of leadership and traits.

• Better predictor of the appearance of Better predictor of the appearance of leadership than distinguishing effective leadership than distinguishing effective and ineffective leaders.and ineffective leaders.

Page 6: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–6

Behavioral TheoriesBehavioral Theories

• Trait theory:Trait theory:Leaders are born, not made.Leaders are born, not made.

• Behavioral theory:Behavioral theory:Leadership traits can be taught.Leadership traits can be taught.

• Trait theory:Trait theory:Leaders are born, not made.Leaders are born, not made.

• Behavioral theory:Behavioral theory:Leadership traits can be taught.Leadership traits can be taught.

Behavioral Theories of Leadership

Theories proposing that specific behaviors differentiate leaders from nonleaders.

Page 7: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–7

Ohio State StudiesOhio State Studies

Initiating Structure

The extent to which a leader is likely to define and structure his or her role and those of sub-ordinates in the search for goal attainment.

Consideration

The extent to which a leader is likely to have job relationships characterized by mutual trust, respect for subordinate’s ideas, and regard for their feelings.

Page 8: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–8

University of Michigan StudiesUniversity of Michigan Studies

Employee-Oriented Leader

Emphasizing interpersonal relations; taking a personal interest in the needs of employees and accepting individual differences among members.Production-Oriented Leader

One who emphasizes technical or task aspects of the job.

Page 9: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–9

The Managerial

Grid(Blake and Mouton)

The Managerial

Grid(Blake and Mouton)

E X H I B I T 11–1E X H I B I T 11–1

Page 10: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–10

Scandinavian StudiesScandinavian Studies

Development-Oriented Leader

One who values experimentation, seeking new ideas, and generating and implementing change.Researchers in Finland and Sweden question whether there are only two dimensions (production-orientation and employee-orientation) that capture the essence of leadership behavior. Their premise is that in a changing world, effective leaders would exhibit development-oriented behavior.

Page 11: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–11

Contingency TheoriesContingency Theories

Fiedler’s Contingency Model

The theory that effective groups depend on a proper match between a leader’s style of interacting with subordinates and the degree to which the situation gives control and influence to the leader.

Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) Questionnaire

An instrument that purports to measure whether a person is task- or relationship-oriented.

Page 12: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–12

Fiedler’s Model: Defining the SituationFiedler’s Model: Defining the Situation

Leader-Member Relations

The degree of confidence, trust, and respect subordinates have in their leader.

Position Power

Influence derived from one’s formal structural position in the organization; includes power to hire, fire, discipline, promote, and give salary increases.

Task Structure

The degree to which the job assignments are procedurized.

Page 13: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–13

Findings from Fiedler ModelFindings from Fiedler Model

E X H I B I T 11–2E X H I B I T 11–2

Page 14: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–14

Cognitive Resource TheoryCognitive Resource Theory

Research Support:

• Less intelligent individuals perform better in leadership roles under high stress than do more intelligent individuals.

• Less experienced people perform better in leadership roles under low stress than do more experienced people.

Research Support:

• Less intelligent individuals perform better in leadership roles under high stress than do more intelligent individuals.

• Less experienced people perform better in leadership roles under low stress than do more experienced people.

Cognitive Resource Theory

A theory of leadership that states that stress can unfavorably affect a situation and that intelligence and experience can lessen the influence of stress on the leader.

Page 15: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–15

Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory

Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory

Situational Leadership Theory (SLT)

A contingency theory that focuses on followers’ readiness.

Leader: decreasing need for support and supervisionLeader: decreasing need for support and supervision

Follower readiness: ability and willingness

Follower readiness: ability and willingness

Unable andUnable andUnwillingUnwilling

Unable butUnable butWillingWilling

Able andAble andWillingWilling

DirectiveDirective High Task and Relationship High Task and Relationship OrientationsOrientations

Supportive Supportive Participative Participative

Able andAble andUnwillingUnwilling

MonitoringMonitoring

Page 16: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–16

Path-Goal TheoryPath-Goal Theory

Path-Goal Theory

The theory that it is the leader’s job to assist followers in attaining their goals and to provide them the necessary direction and/or support to ensure that their goals are compatible with the overall objectives of the group or organization.

Page 17: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 11–17

The Path-Goal TheoryThe Path-Goal Theory

E X H I B I T 11–4E X H I B I T 11–4

Page 18: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12–18

Beyond Charismatic Leadership Beyond Charismatic Leadership

Level 5 Leaders– Possess a fifth dimension—a paradoxical blend

of personal humility and professional will—in addition to the four basic leadership qualities of individual capability, team skills, managerial competence, and the ability to stimulate others to high performance.

– Channel their ego needs away from themselves and into the goal of building a great company.

Page 19: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12–19

Transactional and Transformational LeadershipTransactional and Transformational Leadership

• Contingent Reward

• Management by Exception (active)

• Management by Exception (passive)

• Laissez-Faire

• Charisma

• Inspiration

• Intellectual Stimulation

• Individual Consideration

Transactional Leaders

Leaders who guide or motivate their followers in the direction of established goals by clarifying role and task requirements.

Transformational Leaders

Leaders who provide individualized consideration and intellectual stimulation, and who possess charisma.

Page 20: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12–20

Characteristics of Transactional LeadersCharacteristics of Transactional Leaders

E X H I B I T 12–4E X H I B I T 12–4

Contingent Reward: Contracts exchange of rewards for effort, promises rewards for good performance, recognizes accomplishments.

Management by Exception (active): Watches and searches for deviations from rules and standards, takes corrective action.

Management by Exception (passive): Intervenes only if standards are not met.

Laissez-Faire: Abdicates responsibilities, avoids making decisions.

Source: B. M. Bass, “From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision,” Organizational Dynamics, Winter 1990, p. 22. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. American Management Association, New York. All rights reserved.

Page 21: Leadership

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12–21

Characteristics of Transformational LeadersCharacteristics of Transformational Leaders

E X H I B I T 12–4 (cont’d)E X H I B I T 12–4 (cont’d)

Charisma: Provides vision and sense of mission, instills pride, gains respect and trust.

Inspiration: Communicates high expectations, uses symbols to focus efforts, expresses important purposes in simple ways.

Intellectual Stimulation: Promotes intelligence, rationality, and careful problem solving.

Individualized Consideration: Gives personal attention, treats each employee individually, coaches, advises.