Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

15
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Law Enforcement Section

description

 

Transcript of Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Page 1: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Utah Division of Wildlife Resources

Law Enforcement Section

Page 2: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Law Enforcement Section

• Utah’s statewide deer management plan specifically directs the Division to, “Support law enforcement efforts to educate the public concerning poaching and reduce illegal taking of deer.”

Page 3: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Law Enforcement SectionWhat is our role in wildlife

management?

– We enforce regulations in support of DWR management practices and Wildlife Board policy

– We level the playing field and ensure equal access to the state’s wildlife

– We protect the investment of Utah sportsmen

– We protect vital wildlife habitat

Page 4: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Utah Division of Wildlife Resources

In recent years, Wildlife officers have seen a surge in deer poaching cases involving significant overlimits.

Page 5: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

West Desert (Vernon Unit) Tooele County

• Case Number 2009-000966– Four subjects were reported to have been illegally taking mule

deer from the West Desert (Skull Valley, Stansbury and Cedar Mountain Ranges) for over 20 years. 

– Subjects primarily killed mature buck mule deer beginning in November until the deer shed their antlers. 

– The group would “take turns“ killing deer.  After the deer were killed, the antlers were often sawed off, hidden and retrieved at a later date. 

– It is also believed that the subjects would use other persons permits to illegally take wildlife during open season. 

Page 6: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

West Desert (Vernon Unit) Tooele County

– Several search warrants have been served at various locations.  Over 90 animals were seized, including Mule Deer, Antelope and Elk. 

– Currently, six individuals face numerous felony counts including: 

• The RICO ACT

• Wanton Destruction of Protected Wildlife

• Aiding / Assisting Wanton Destruction of Protected Wildlife

• Tampering With Witnesses

•  Obstruction of Justice

Page 7: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Diamond Valley Washington County

• Case Number 2009-000885

– DWR officers were contacted by a concerned citizen regarding suspected deer poaching near diamond valley.

– DWR Officers ultimately confirmed five poached deer (4 does and a buck) at Esplin Vineyard.

– Five individuals were arrested and charged with wanton destruction of protected wildlife for their involvement in the case.

Page 8: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Sand Mountain (Vernon Unit) Juab County

• Case Number 2008- 120101– Resulted from call to UTiP Hotline

– Four individuals were ultimately charged with multiple felony counts of Wanton Destruction of Protected Wildlife

– Deer were being killed at night on winter range

– 17 buck deer heads were seized as a result of the investigation

Page 9: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Panguitch Deer Case Garfield County

• Case Number 2009-000308– Case resulted after receiving a call from a concerned citizen

– Two individuals were charged with killing nine deer and two pronghorn

Page 10: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Trends

– Winter Ranges targeted and buck/doe ratios affected

– Deer are often shot and left to be later retrieved

– All cases were brought to our attention by concerned citizens

– In some cases multiple generations of the same family were involved

Page 11: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Strategies

– Decrease social acceptance of poaching – increased emphasis on outreach. We strive to increase voluntary compliance

– Prioritized placing officers in vacant districts and added personnel where possible, i.e. Book Cliffs

– We will better define the role of our investigators and focus them on the most egregious violators

– Further working to streamline administrative processes to maximize patrol time

– Work to increase patrol efforts on targeted winter ranges, addressing any threats to vulnerable, wintering deer

– Explore opportunities to create a public safety awareness campaign in an effort to reduce car/deer collisions

Page 12: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Additional Efforts

– Habitat Protection • OHV Enforcement in regard to habitat

destruction has been prioritized in field patrol efforts

• We prioritize enforcement of road closures on DWR wildlife management areas to minimize impacts upon vulnerable wintering deer

• OHV education is an integral part of our online antler-gathering education course

Page 13: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Additional Efforts

– DWR conservation officers continue to assist other sections in the completion of their mission by assisting with non-enforcement duties

Page 14: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting

Our Impact

– Wildlife management practices on trophy units could not be successful without the protection that we provide.

– We deter potential violators and ensure equal opportunity to the state’s wildlife

– We serve as partners with ethical sportsmen in protecting their investment

– We work to ensure adequate habitat to support vulnerable deer herds

Page 15: Law Enforcement — Dec. 2010 Board Meeting