LAPALALA SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT€¦ · km north of Vaalwater and 80 km west of Mokopane, Lephalale...
Transcript of LAPALALA SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT€¦ · km north of Vaalwater and 80 km west of Mokopane, Lephalale...
LAPALALA SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT
BASELINE TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY AND BIODIVERSITY SENSITIVITY
ASSESSMENT
December 2016
Prepared for: Peter Velcich NuLeaf Planning and Environmental PostNet Suite 168 Private Bag X 844 Silverton 0127
Prepared by: Author: Reviewers:
ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 Duncan McKenzie Dr Rob Palmer (Nepid Consultants) Warren McCleland (Ecorex)
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
2 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................... 3
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... 3
EIA REGULATIONS SPECIALISTS REPORT CHECKLIST .................................................................. 4
ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 5
TERMINOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 5
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 6
2. TERMS OF REFERENCE ................................................................................................................. 7
3. STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................................ 8
4. METHODS ........................................................................................................................................... 10
4.1 FLORA ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 4.2 FAUNA ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 4.3 SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................... 11 4.3 ASSUMPTIONS, LIMITATIONS AND KNOWLEDGE GAPS .............................................................................. 12
4.3.1 Seasonality ........................................................................................................................................ 12 4.3.2 Overlooked Species ......................................................................................................................... 12
5. BIODIVERSITY BASELINE DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................... 13
5.1 FLORA ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 5.1.1 National Vegetation Types .............................................................................................................. 13 5.1.2 Limpopo Province Biodiversity Conservation Assessment ........................................................ 13 5.1.3 Descriptions of Development Sites ............................................................................................... 14 5.1.4 Confirmed Conservation-Important Flora ..................................................................................... 18 5.1.5 Potentially Occurring Plant Species of Conservation Concern ................................................. 19
5.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA ................................................................................................................................. 20 5.2.1 Mammals ........................................................................................................................................... 20 5.2.2 Birds ................................................................................................................................................... 21 5.2.3 Reptiles .............................................................................................................................................. 22 5.2.3 Frogs .................................................................................................................................................. 22
6. SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................. 23
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 25
8. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 26
9. APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................................... 28
APPENDIX 1. CHECKLIST OF FLORA RECORDED DURING FIELDWORK ............................................................ 28 APPENDIX 2. LOCALITIES OF CONFIRMED CONSERVATION-IMPORTANT PLANT SPECIES ................................ 31 APPENDIX 3. POTENTIALLY OCCURRING PLANT SPECIES OF CONSERVATION CONCERN................................ 32 APPENDIX 4. CHECKLIST OF FAUNA CONFIRMED DURING FIELDWORK ............................................................ 33 APPENDIX 5. POTENTIALLY OCCURRING FAUNA OF CONSERVATION CONCERN .............................................. 38 APPENDIX 6. DUNCAN MCKENZIE CV ............................................................................................................. 42 APPENDIX 7. SPECIALIST DECLARATION FORM ............................................................................................... 43 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ................................................................................................................... 44
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
3 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
List of Tables Table 1. Sensitivity Drivers and Scores used to assess the sensitivity of the proposed development sites. ..................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 2. Plant species of conservation importance recorded during fieldwork ........................................ 18 Table 3. Sensitivity of South West sites to biodiversity / development conflict......................................... 23
List of Figures Figure 1. Location of proposed developments of the Lapalala Wilderness School ................................... 9 Figure 2. Selected photos from the proposed Staff Housing complex ....................................................... 15 Figure 3. Selected photos from the proposed School site ........................................................................... 16 Figure 4. Vegetation Associations within the two proposed development sites ....................................... 17 Figure 5. Photo of Elaeodendron transvaalense ........................................................................................... 19 Figure 6. Map of the Sensitivity categories of the two Sites ........................................................................ 24
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
4 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
EIA REGULATIONS SPECIALISTS REPORT CHECKLIST
page 06
page 42
page 43
page 06
page 10
page 10
page 23
page 25
page 24
page 12
page 13
page 25
page 25
page 25
page 25
page 25
X n/a
X n/a
none
(ii) if the opinion is that the proposed activity or portions thereof should be authorised, any avoidance,
management and mitigation measures that should be included in the EMPr, and where applicable, the closure
plan;
(o) a description of any consultation process that was undertaken during the course of preparing the specialist
report;
(p) a summary and copies of any comments received during any consultation process and where applicable all
responses thereto; and
(q) any other information requested by the competent authority.
(j) a description of the findings and potential implications of such findings on the impact of the proposed activity,
including identified alternatives on the environment;
(k) any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr;
(l) any conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation;
(m) any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or environmental authorisation;
(n) a reasoned opinion-
(i) as to whether the proposed activity or portions thereof should be authorised; and
(i) a description of any assumptions made and any uncertainties or gaps in knowledge;
(1) A specialist report prepared in terms of the 2014 Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations must contain-
(a) details of-
(i) the specialist who prepared the report; and
(ii) the expertise of that specialist to compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae;
(b) a declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be specified by the competent authority;
(c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared;
(d) the date and season of the site investigation and the relevance of the season to the outcome of the assessment;
(e) a description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or carrying out the specialised process;
(f) the specific identified sensitivity of the site related to the activity and its associated structures and infrastructure;
(g) an identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers;
(h) a map superimposing the activity including the associated structures and infrastructure on the environmental
sensitivities of the site including areas to be avoided, including buffers;
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
5 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
ABBREVIATIONS LEMA Limpopo Environmental Management Act (No. 7 of 2003)
mamsl Metres Above Mean Sea Level
NEMBA ToPS National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act Threatened
or Protected Species (No. 10 of 2004)
NFA National Forest Act (No. 30 of 1998)
PRECIS National Herbarium Pretoria (PRE) Computerised Information
System
SABAP2 Southern African Bird Atlas Project 2
TERMINOLOGY Alien Introduced from elsewhere: neither endemic nor indigenous.
Biodiversity The structural, functional and compositional attributes of an area,
ranging from genes to landscapes.
Degraded An ecosystem that is a poor ecological state, usually through
impacts such as invasion by alien plants, severe overgrazing, poor
burning regimes, etc. These systems still contain a moderate
proportion of indigenous flora.
Geophyte Plants that produce their growth points from organs stored below
the ground, an adaption to survive frost, drought and / or fire.
Riparian Pertaining to the river bank.
Transformed Transformed ecosystems are no longer natural and contain little or
no indigenous flora. Examples include agricultural lands,
plantations, urban areas, etc.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
6 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
1. INTRODUCTION Lapalala Wilderness School, currently situated within the 45 000 ha Lapalala Wilderness
between Modimolle and Lephalale in west-central Limpopo Province, has been ear-marked
for relocation due to current proposed developments within the reserve. These include re-
introducing dangerous game and selling freehold title stands. The proposal is to move the
school, which has been running for more than 30 years, to a site immediately south of the
reserve outside the formally protected area. Two areas are planned for development: a staff
housing complex and the school itself.
ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC was appointed by Peter Velcich of NuLeaf Planning &
Environmental to conduct the terrestrial ecology study for a Basic Assessment Report
(BAR), which would provide a basis for assessing potential impacts of the project on
terrestrial ecology and guide the design and location of additional planned infrastructure. The
study comprised flora and vertebrate fauna (mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs). The two key
deliverables were a baseline terrestrial ecology survey and an integrated Biodiversity Value
Assessment.
The Terrestrial Ecologist for this study was Duncan McKenzie, who has been involved in
over 70 Environmental Impact Assessments in South Africa and seven other countries in
Africa over the last nine years. A brief CV is included in Appendix 6 and a signed Declaration
of Independence in Appendix 7.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
7 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
2. TERMS OF REFERENCE
A. Conduct an assessment of the terrestrial vertebrate fauna and flora at each development
site, which will include the following:
o Brief description of vegetation associations at each site;
o Description of faunal assemblages within the vicinity of each site (mammals, birds,
reptiles and frogs);
o Emphasis will be placed on locating species of conservation importance (Red Data,
endemic, and / or protected).
B. Assessment of the Biodiversity Value of the vegetation units represented, which will
comprise:
o Assessment of conservation importance and functional importance of each
vegetation association.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
8 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
3. STUDY AREA
The proposed development is situated on Portion 1 and 2 of the farm Frischgewaagd 649
LR, approximately 4 km from the South Gate of Lapalala Wilderness and approximately 50
km north of Vaalwater and 80 km west of Mokopane, Lephalale Local Municipality, Limpopo
Province (Figure 1). The two proposed sites cover an area of 3.1 hectares.
The study area is within the quarter-degree grid 2328 CD at an elevation range between
1120 and 1170 mamsl. The topography of the staff quarters and school areas is generally
flat. The proposed school is situated in close proximity to the Lephalala River which drains
into the Limpopo River.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
9 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Figure 1. Location of proposed developments of the Lapalala Wilderness School
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
10 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
4. METHODS
The fieldwork component of this project was approached as a Rapid Biological Assessment,
with the aim being to balance a limited field time budget with the need for relative scientific
accuracy. Both of the proposed development sites were surveyed on foot using boundaries
supplied by NuLeaf.
4.1 Flora
Desktop Vegetation communities were identified prior to fieldwork using Google™ Earth imagery.
Red Data plant species listed for the quarter-degree grid 2328 CD, in which the study area is
situated in, and surrounding grids in the PRECIS database from the South African National
Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), was used to produce a list of the most likely threatened
species, which was searched for during fieldwork.
Fieldwork Fieldwork was conducted over one day in October 2016. Each of the two proposed
development sites was surveyed on foot using centre-point co-ordinates supplied by NuLeaf.
These were pre-loaded onto a Garmin 62s GPS and were used to delimit the area in which
to search for any conservation-important species of flora and fauna as listed under the
Limpopo Environmental Management Act (No. 7 of 2003), National Forests Act (No. 30 of
1998), National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (No. 10 of 2004) Threatened
and Protected Species Lists (GG Notice 256, 2015) and the various national Red Data Lists.
The location of any species found was recorded using the GPS. Plants were listed according
to each of the vegetation communities identified during the desktop phase.
4.2 Fauna
Desktop
Lists of conservation-important mammals, birds, reptiles and frogs potentially occurring
within the project area were prepared using data from Friedmann & Daly (2004), the
Southern African Bird Atlas Project 2 http://sabap2.adu.org.za/, Taylor et al. (2015), Minter et
al. (2004), Bates et al. (2014) and from the Lapalala Management Plan (2016 update). The
above data were captured mostly at a quarter-degree spatial resolution, but were refined by
excluding species unlikely to occur within the study area, due to unsuitable habitat
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
11 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
characteristics (e.g. altitude and land-use). Potential occurrence of fauna in the study area
was predicted based on knowledge of known habitat requirements of each species.
Fieldwork
Birds were surveyed by slowly walking through each of the vegetation types at each
development site. Birds were identified audially and visually using Bushnell 10x42 binoculars
and habitat utilisation notes made for each species. Frequent stops were made in order to
observe species that could not be observed by walking through vegetation (e.g. skulking
undergrowth species). Mammals, reptiles and frogs were recorded incidentally as they were
encountered during the ground and aerial surveys through direct evidence (sightings) and
indirect evidence (spoor, dung). No nocturnal searches were performed.
4.3 Sensitivity Assessment
The overall ecological sensitivity of the two proposed development sites was assessed
against seven Sensitivity Drivers on a sensitivity matrix. A score between zero and five is
given for each of the Drivers with zero indicating an absent or not applicable impact and five
that of a very high or confirmed one. These scores are summed and the average calculated
and compared to the sensitivity values reflected in Table 1. Scores of four or higher indicate
options with a high sensitivity, those of three with moderate sensitivity and scores of below 2
with low sensitivity. These scores are indicative of the potential biodiversity / infrastructure
development conflict, with higher scores indicating potentially high conflict. Most favourable
sites are those with lower potential for conflict.
Table 1. Sensitivity Drivers and Scores used to assess the sensitivity of the proposed
development sites.
SENSITIVITY DRIVERS SCORES
Current Ecological State 0 = Absent / Not applicable
Potential to Support Biodiversity 1 = Very low / Negligable
Potential to Support Red-Listed Species 2 = Low
Potential for Negative Associated Impacts 3 = Moderate
Irreplaceability of Natural Habitat 4 = High
Relative Size of Impact Footprint 5 = Very High / Confirmed
Presence of Unique Habitat / Taxa
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
12 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
4.3 Assumptions, Limitations and Knowledge Gaps
4.3.1 Seasonality
The assessment was based on a single field survey in early summer only, during a period of
sustained high temperatures and little recent rainfall. It is likely that many plants which flower
at other times of the year as well as plants that would normally have flowered after spring /
early summer rains are underrepresented. Due to the small size of each of the proposed
footprints within the study area this is not seen as a major limitation.
4.3.2 Overlooked Species
Certain plant species, particularly geophytes, will only flower in seasons when conditions are
optimal and may thus remain undetected, even over a survey that encompasses several
seasons. Other plant species may be overlooked because of very small size and / or
extreme rarity. A sampling strategy will always represent merely a subset of the true diversity
of the study area. However, the level of sampling effort for this study was appropriate for the
objectives of the study.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
13 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
5. BIODIVERSITY BASELINE DESCRIPTION
5.1 Flora
5.1.1 National Vegetation Types According to Mucina & Rutherford (2006), the study area is situated within the Waterberg
Mountain Bushveld vegetation type, which is in the Central Bushveld Bioregion of the
Savanna Biome. This vegetation type is described briefly below, based on the account in
Mucina & Rutherford (2006).
Waterberg Mountain Bushveld
Waterberg Mountain Bushveld is located in the foothills, escarpment and tablelands of the
Waterberg Mountains between Lephalale, Marken and Bela-Bela in the north-western region
of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Vegetation structure comprises low to mid-high woodland
that is dominated by deciduous, broad-leaved tree species, and has a grass-dominated
herbaceous layer. Soils are mostly sandstone, subordinate conglomerate, siltstones and
shale of the Kransberg Subgroup. Dominant canopy species within this vegetation type
include Burkea africana, Combretum apiculatum, Acacia caffra and Acacia robusta. Other
commonly recorded tree species include Heteropyxis natalensis, Combretum molle,
Pseudolachnostylis maprouneifolia and Terminalia sericea. Common shrubs include
Dichrostachys cinerea, Euclea crispa and Olea capensis. Waterberg Mountain Bushveld was
assessed by Mucina & Rutherford (2006) as Least Threatened because of a low level of
transformation (3%) and because 9% of the protection target of 24% is conserved in
Marakele National Park and Moepel Nature Reserve.
The study area is not situated in any floristic centres of endemism, which are areas that have
an unusually high number of plants unique to that area (Van Wyk & Smith, 2001) and is not
within any listed Threatened Ecosystem (Notice 1002 of Government Gazette 34809, 9
December 2011).
5.1.2 Limpopo Province Biodiversity Conservation Assessment
While the Terrestrial Ecosystem Status of the vegetation types in the study area is Not
Currently Threatened, the Limpopo Province Biodiversity Conservation Assessment
classifies most of the study area and general surroundings as a Critical Biodiversity Area 1
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
14 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
(CBA1), although the area itself is not included in an officially recognised protected area
(Desmet et al., 2013). CBA1’s are described as Irreplaceable Sites that are required to
meet biodiversity pattern and/or ecological processes targets. The primary land
management objective for CBA1’s is to maintain them in a natural state with limited or no
biodiversity loss and to rehabilitate degraded areas to a natural or near natural state.
Compatible land uses for these areas include conservation activities such as eco-tourism
and extensive game farming (Desmet et al., 2013).
5.1.3 Descriptions of Development Sites Vegetation communities were identified at each site on the basis of distinctive vegetation
structure (grassland, woodland, thicket, etc.), floristic composition (dominant and diagnostic
species) and position in the landscape (mid-slopes, terrace, crest, etc.). The vegetation
communities at each of the two development sites are described briefly below. The total flora
species list is presented in Appendix 1.
5.1.3.1 Staff Housing Site
The proposed staff housing site is situated on the second terrace above the Lephalale River
and consists of untransformed woodland (Figure 4). One untransformed vegetation type is
located within the site (Figure 2):
i. Terminalia sericea – Combretum zeyheri Low Mid-Dense to Closed Woodland
This is the only vegetation community within the proposed staff housing complex. Vegetation
structure is Low Mid-Dense to Closed Woodland (sensu Edwards, 1983) with Terminalia
sericea and Combretum zeyheri being the dominant large trees in the canopy. Other
common trees include Combretum apiculatum subsp. apiculatum, Commiphora schimperi
and Peltophorum africanum. The shrubs Euclea natalensis subsp. angustifolia,
Dichrostachys cinerea subsp. africana and Ximenia americana var. microphylla are
dominant below the canopy. Grasses are represented by Aristida adscensionis, Eragrostis
sp. and Loudetia simplex. Herbs were mostly dormant at the time of the survey but Jatropha
zeyheri and Raphionacme velutina were visible.
Thirty-three species (56 % of the entire list) were recorded from the proposed staff housing
site (Appendix 1) although a wet season survey would significantly increase this total with
the addition of herbaceous species. One species of conservation concern was recorded,
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
15 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
namely Elaeodendron transvaalense which is listed as Near Threatened and is protected
under the National Forests Act (No. 30 of 1998). One small plant was located (Figure 5).
Three individuals of another conservation-important species, Sclerocarya birrea subsp.
caffra, were located. This tree is also protected under the National Forests Act (No. 30 of
1998, Table 2).
Figure 2. Selected photos from the proposed Staff Housing complex
5.1.3.2 New Lapalala School Site
The site for the proposed new Lapalala School is on the first terrace above the Lephalale
River, c. 500 m north east of the proposed staff village (Figure 1). One vegetation community
is present within the development impact area:
i. Acacia karroo – Eragrostis curvula Short Mid-dense to Closed Woodland
This vegetation community occurs on old lands on sandy sediments and contains a low
diversity of plants. Vegetation structure is Short Mid-dense to Closed Woodland (sensu
Edwards, 1983, Figure 3). Dominant canopy trees include Acacia karroo and Olea europaea
subsp. africana while Terminalia sericea and Acacia nigrescens occurred in lower
abundance. Common shrubs found include Euclea crispa, Diospyros lycioides subsp.
lycioides and Dichrostachys cinerea subsp. africana. The grasses Eragrostis curvula and
Pogonarthria squarrosa were dominant on the ground layer. Herbs were not visible during
the survey.
Thirty-three species (56 % of the entire list) were recorded from the proposed school site
(Appendix 1) although a wet season survey would increase this total slightly with the addition
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
16 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
of herbaceous species. One species of conservation concern was recorded: the tree
Elaeodendron transvaalense is listed as Near Threatened and is protected under the
National Forests Act (No. 30 of 1998) (Appendix 2). One large tree was located growing on a
termitarium and its locality is indicated in Figure 4. In addition, a single Boscia albitrunca
(protected under the National Forests Act No. 30 of 1998) and a few Spirostachys africana
(protected under the Limpopo Environmental Management Act No. 7 of 2003) were located
(Table 2).
Figure 3. Selected photos from the proposed School site
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
17 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Figure 4. Vegetation Associations within the two proposed development sites
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
18 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
5.1.4 Confirmed Conservation-Important Flora
One plant species located within the boundaries of the two proposed development sites is
considered to be of conservation concern as defined by Raimondo et al. (2009)1, namely the
tree Elaeodendron transvaalense, which is listed as Near Threatened and is described in
more detail below:
i. Transvaal Saffron Elaeodendron transvaalense (Burtt Davy) R.H.Archer
Transvaal Saffron is a small to medium-sized evergreen tree occurring in northern and
eastern South Africa, and further afield through Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe,
Mozambique and Zambia. The species is heavily harvested in South Africa for traditional
medicine and some sub-populations have declined as a result; as such it has been assessed
as Near Threatened (Williams et al., 2008a). One large tree was located on a large
termitarium in the proposed school site (Figure 5).
Three trees confirmed during fieldwork are protected under the National Forests Act (No. 30
of 1998): Boscia albitrunca, Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra and Elaeodendron
transvaalense and one tree (Spirostachys africana) is protected under the Limpopo
Environmental Management Act (No. 7 of 2003, Table 2).
Table 2. Plant species of conservation importance recorded during fieldwork
Taxa Growth Form
Red
data
Pro
tecte
d
Sta
ff H
ou
sin
g
Sch
oo
l
Family Anacardiaceae
Sclerocarya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro tree NFA r
Family Capparaceae
Boscia albitrunca (Burch.) Gilg & Gilg-Ben. tree NFA r
Family Celastraceae
Elaeodendron transvaalense (Burtt Davy) R.H.Archer tree NT NFA r
Family Euphorbiaceae
Spirostachys africana Sond. tree LEMA r
TOTAL 4 1 4 1 3
NT = Near Threatened r = rare
NFA = National Forests Act
LEMA = Limpopo Environmental Management Act
1 Raimondo et al. (2009) regard species of conservation concern to include those with a status of Declining, Near
Threatened and Data Deficient, and threatened species with a status of Vulnerable, Endangered and Critically Endangered.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
19 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Figure 5. Photo of Elaeodendron transvaalense
5.1.5 Potentially Occurring Plant Species of Conservation Concern
An additional 17 plant species of conservation concern have been recorded from the quarter
degree grid 2328 CD and surrounding grids (Appendix 3), of which only one species has a
moderate chance of occurring, namely Drimia sanguinea, which is dealt with below. None of
these are considered to be threatened as defined by Raimondo et al. (2009).
Snake-root Drimia sanguinea (Schinz) Jessop
This is another species confined to southern Africa, occurring from western Free State and
Northern Cape through northern South Africa to Namibia, Botswana and Zimbabwe. Snake-
root is a well-known highly poisonous species which has resulted in large-scale mortality in
livestock in the past. It is also one of the most widely traded species in traditional medicine
markets and populations have declined by 20-25% as a result; the species has therefore
been assessed as Near Threatened (Williams et al., 2008b). This is a deciduous plant and
may have been dormant in the study area during fieldwork.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
20 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
5.2 Terrestrial Fauna
5.2.1 Mammals
The study area, although not situated within a formally protected area, is situated adjacent to
the 45 000 hectare Lapalala Wilderness reserve. A few large mammals were recorded within
the study area but based on limited observations it appears as if the area is primarily used
for cattle grazing. Located within the savanna biome, the study area potentially has high
mammal diversity although many of these would be small mammals such as rodents,
insectivores and bats. Most of the larger, threatened mammal species such as White
Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum), Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) and Roan (Hippotragus
equinus) would have been extirpated many years ago and a few species are now only likely
as vagrants. Nine mammal species were recorded during fieldwork within the study area
during fieldwork (Appendix 4). Of these, one is considered to be threatened: Hippopotamus
(Hippopotamus amphibius), which has been assessed as Vulnerable. At least one
Hippopotamus was observed in the adjacent Lephalale River. One additional species is
classified as Near Threatened: Brown Hyaena (Parahyaena brunnea). Territorial pasting by
a hyaena was observed near the proposed School Site. This is a small greasy deposit
placed on grass stalks from a secretion from the anal gland that is used in olfactory
communication1. Four of the confirmed species are protected either under the National
Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (No. 10 of 2004) Threatened and Protected
Species Lists (GG Notice 256, 2015) or the Limpopo Environmental Management Act (No. 7
of 2003, Appendix 4).
Thirty-five additional conservation-important mammals potentially occur within the general
vicinity of the proposed development footprints (Appendix 6). Of the 19 species with a
moderate or high likelihood of occurring within the study area, only two are considered to be
of conservation concern2, both of which are classified as Near Threatened (Appendix 6).
One of these is a carnivore, namely Honey Badger (Mellivora capensis), while one species is
a small bat (Rusty Bat, Pipistrellus rusticus). Both of these species could potentially occur
anywhere in natural habitat in the study area but due to the small size of each proposed
development footprint probably only as occasional visitors. The rest of the potentially
occurring species are either classified as Data Deficient, meaning that not enough data were
1 Estes, 1995 2 The same approach as Raimondo et al. (2009) has been followed here regarding species of conservation concern (i.e. those with a status of Declining, Near Threatened and Data Deficient, and threatened species with a status of Vulnerable, Endangered and Critically Endangered)
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
21 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
available in order to assess their Red Data status1, or have a low likelihood of occurrence. It
is probable that at least a few Data-Deficient species do occur, particularly shrews in the
genera Crocidura and Suncus. Ten potentially occurring species with a moderate or higher
likelihood of occurrence are protected either under the Threatened and Protected Species
Lists (GG Notice 256, 2015) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act
(No. 10 of 2004) or the Limpopo Environmental Management Act (No. 7 of 2003) (Appendix
6).
5.2.2 Birds
5.2.2.1 Species richness
Of the nine biomes in Southern Africa, the savannah biome supports the highest diversity of
bird species within the sub-region. The study area, situated within the quarter-degree grid
2328 CD, has only had 122 species recorded to date by the second Southern African Bird
Atlas Projects (SABAP2)2. This total does depend on the number of checklists submitted to
the project and the remoteness of the area has resulted in very few submissions to the
project. Fifty-three species were confirmed to occur in the study area during fieldwork
(Appendix 4), a reasonable total considering the dry conditions prevailing during fieldwork.
Further sampling in the wet season would produce moderately more species. Insufficient
time was spent within the two proposed development areas to sample birds using the
Mackinnon sampling method and therefore no assemblages will be described.
5.2.2.3 Species of Conservation Concern
Fifteen threatened3 or Near Threatened bird species potentially occur within the general
vicinity of the study area (Appendix 4). None of these were recorded during fieldwork. Two
of the potentially occurring species with a moderate or high likelihood of occurring in the
vicinity of Lapalala are threatened species, one of which is classified as Endangered and
one as Vulnerable (Appendix 6). Martial Eagle Polemaetus bellicosus (Endangered) and
Lanner Falcon Falco biarmicus (Vulnerable) may occasionally forage over the study area
although no breeding habitat is present for either species. The remaining potentially
1 Friedman & Daly, 2004 2http://sabap1.adu.org.za/sabap_site_summary.php?autoSite=SABAP&QDGC=2328CDaccessed
24/11/2016 3 Threatened species are those with a status of Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
22 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
occurring species are wetland or grassland species and little habitat is present within the
study area for them or they have very low reporting rate in the area or are unrecorded from
the area and therefore unlikely to occur.
5.2.3 Reptiles
Sixty-two species of reptiles have been recorded from the entire degree grid 2328, as listed
on the Reptile Atlas of Southern Africa website (http://vmus.adu.org.za/vm_sp_list.php), in
Bates et al. (2014). Three potentially occurring species are species of conservation concern:
Orange-throated Flat Lizard (Platysaurus monotropis) is classified as Endangered, Nile
Crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) is classified as Vulnerable and is listed as Vulnerable under
the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (No. 10 of 2004) Threatened and
Protected Species Lists (GG Notice 256, 2015) and Southern African Python (Python
natalensis) is listed as Protected under the National Environmental Management:
Biodiversity Act (No. 10 of 2004) Threatened and Protected Species Lists (GG Notice 256,
2015, Appendix 6). Nile Crocodile has a Low likelihood of occurring within the adjacent
Lephalale River due to disturbance. The flat lizard has a Low likelihood of occurrence due to
occurring further north than Lapalala and the python has a High likelihood of occurring
anywhere within the study area although due to the small size of the area, it is likely to only
occur irregularly. Only two reptile species were recorded during fieldwork (Appendix 4).
However, a dedicated reptile survey using pitfall traps and drift fences, as well as additional
nocturnal surveys, would be needed to adequately sample this fauna group.
5.2.3 Frogs
Twenty-two species of frogs have been recorded from the degree grid 2328
(http://vmus.adu.org.za/vm_sp_list.php) and in Minter et al, 2004. None are threatened or
protected. No frog species were recorded during fieldwork although additional nocturnal
surveys during the wet season would result in at least a few species.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
23 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
6. SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT
The ecological sensitivity of the two proposed development sites were assessed on a
sensitivity matrix as indicated in Table 33 below. The score for each site is indicative of the
potential biodiversity / infrastructure development conflict, with higher scores indicating
potentially high conflict. Most favourable sites are those with lower potential for conflict. The
sensitivity of each site is presented spatially in Figure 6.
Table 3. Sensitivity of South West sites to biodiversity / development conflict
SENSITIVITY DRIVERS
DEVELOPMENT SITES
Sta
ff H
ou
sin
g
Sch
oo
l
Current Ecological State 3 2
Potential to Support Biodiversity 3 2
Potential to Support Red-Listed Species 2 2
Potential for Negative Associated Impacts 2 3
Irreplaceability of Natural Habitat 2 1
Relative Size of Impact Footprint 1 1
Presence of Unique Habitat / Taxa 2 2
SCORE 15 13
AVERAGE 2 2
0 = Absent / Not applicable
1 = Very low / Negligible
2 = Low
3 = Moderate
4 = High
5 = Very High / Confirmed
Both sites in the study area were rated as having Low Sensitivity. These are sites where
considerable loss in biodiversity has occurred either through bush encroachment or bush
clearing, overgrazing or old agricultural lands. Species diversity is low although one Near
Threatened and four protected plant species were confirmed in the two sites. The potential
to support threatened fauna species is also low to moderate, despite the confirmed presence
of Brown Hyaena and Hippopotamus in adjacent areas.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
24 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Figure 6. Map of the Sensitivity categories of the two Sites
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
25 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The terrestrial ecology of two potential development sites was assessed over a one-day
period in October 2016. The proposed sites are all situated within Waterberg Mountain
Bushveld which is not considered to be threatened. However, the Limpopo Province
Biodiversity Conservation Assessment classifies the study area and general surroundings as
a Critical Biodiversity Area 1 (CBA1), an area deemed to be Irreplaceable. No threatened
plant species were confirmed during fieldwork but one Near Threatened and four species
protected either under the Limpopo Environmental Management (Act No. 7 of 2003) or the
National Forests Act (No. 30 of 1998) were recorded. No threatened plant species
potentially occur. In total, 59 plant species were recorded from the two sites. One threatened
fauna species was recorded: Hippopotamus, although in the adjacent Lephalale River and
not from within the two sites. In addition, one Near Threatened species was also confirmed:
Brown Hyaena. Four confirmed species are protected either under the Limpopo
Environmental Management (Act No. 7 of 2003) or the National Environmental Management:
Biodiversity Act Threatened or Protected Species (No. 10 of 2004). Two threatened species
have a moderate or high likelihood of occurring within the study area: Martial Eagle
(Endangered) and Lanner Falcon (Vulnerable).
Based on this sensitivity assessment, the following recommendations can be made:
i. All infrastructure at the School Site to be situated outside of the riparian zone and
above the 1/100 year floodline of the Lephalale River.
ii. Prior to any construction at any of the sites, an experienced botanist should conduct
a walk-through of these sites during the wet season (Dec-Apr), marking each plant
species of conservation concern to be avoided or that may need to be relocated prior
to any site clearance activity taking place.
iii. All proposed roads to contain adequate stormwater drainage and erosion control
measures, especially in the area between the two proposed development sites where
the road is currently in a bad condition.
iv. Wherever possible, tall trees should be left unharmed, whether protected by law or
not.
Provided the recommendations suggested in this report are followed, there is no objection to
the proposed development in terms of the terrestrial ecosystems of the study area.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
26 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
8. REFERENCES
Bates, M.F., Branch, W.R., Bauer, A.M., Burger, M., Marais, J., Alexander, G.J. & de Villiers,
M.S. (eds), 2014. Atlas and Red Data List of the Reptiles of South Africa, Lesotho
and Swaziland. Suricata 1. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
DEAT. 2011. National List of Threatened Terrestrial Ecosystems in South Africa. National
Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (Act 10 of 2004). Government Gazette.
Desmet, P. G., Holness, S., Skowno, A. & Egan, V.T. (2013). Limpopo Conservation Plan
v.2: Technical Report. Contract Number EDET/2216/2012. Report for Limpopo
Department of Economic Development, Environment & Tourism (LEDET) by
ECOSOL GIS.
Development, Environment & Tourism (LEDET) by ECOSOL GIS. Edwards, D. 1983. A
broad-scale structural classification of vegetation for practical purposes. Bothalia
14:705-712.
Estes, Richard D. 1995. The Behaviour Guide to African Mammals. Russel Friedman Books,
Halfway House.
Friedmann, Y. & Daly, B. (editors). 2004. Red Data Book of the Mammals of South Africa: A
Conservation Assessment. CBSG Southern Africa, Conservation Breeding Specialist
Group (SSC / IUCN), Endangered Wildlife Trust. South Africa.
Minter, L.R., Burger, M., Harrison, J.A., Braack, H.H., Bishop, P.J. & Kloepfer, D.2004. Atlas
and Red Data Book of the Frogs of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. SI/MAB
Series No.9. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
Mucina, L. and Rutherford, M.C. (eds) 2006. The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and
Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
O’Dea, N., Watson, J.E.M. & Whittaker, R.J. 2004. Rapid assessment in conservation
research: a critique of avifaunal assessment techniques illustrated by Ecuadorian
and Madagascan case study data. Diversity and Distributions 10:55-63.
Raimondo, D., Von Staden, L., Foden, W., Victor, J.E., Helme, N.A., Turner, R.C., Kamundi,
D.A. & Manyama, P.A. (eds) 2009. Red List of South African Plants 2009. Strelitzia
25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
Taylor, M.R., Peacock, F., Wanless, R.W. (eds). 2015. The Eskom Red Data Book of Birds
of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Birdlife South Africa, Johannesburg.
Van Wyk, A. E. & Smith, G. F. 2001. Regions of floristic endemism in southern Africa: A
review with emphasis on succulents. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
27 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Williams, V.L., Raimondo, D., Crouch, N.R., Cunningham, A.B., Scott-Shaw, C.R., Lötter, M.
& Ngwenya, A.M. 2008a. Elaeodendron transvaalense (Burtt Davy) R.H.Archer.
National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants version 2015.1. Accessed on
2016/11/23.
Williams, V.L., Raimondo, D., Crouch, N.R., Brueton, V.J., Cunningham, A.B., Scott-Shaw,
C.R., Lötter, M. & Ngwenya, A.M. 2008b. Drimia sanguinea (Schinz) Jessop.
National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants version 2015.1. Accessed on
2016/11/23.
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
28 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
9. APPENDICES
Appendix 1. Checklist of Flora recorded during fieldwork
Taxa Growth Form
Red
data
Pro
tecte
d
Sta
ff H
ou
sin
g
Sch
oo
l
Family Anacardiaceae
Lannea discolor (Sond.) Engl. tree r
Ozoroa paniculosa (Sond.) R.& A.Fern. var. paniculosa tree r
Sclerocarya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro tree NFA r
Searsia leptodictya (Diels) T.S.Yi, A.J.Mill. & J.Wen forma leptodictya tree r
Family Apocynaceae
Raphionacme velutina Schltr. herb r
Sarcostemma viminale (L.) R.Br. subsp. viminale succulent r
Family Asparagaceae
Asparagus buchananii Baker dwarf shrub r
Family Boraginaceae
Ehretia rigida (Thunb.) Druce subsp. nervifolia Retief & A.E.van Wyk shrub r
Family Burseraceae
Commiphora schimperi (O.Berg) Engl. tree r
Family Cactaceae
* Opuntia stricta Haw. succulent r r
Family Capparaceae
Boscia albitrunca (Burch.) Gilg & Gilg-Ben. tree NFA r
Family Celastraceae
Elaeodendron transvaalense (Burtt Davy) R.H.Archer tree NT NFA r
Maytenus albata (N.E.Br.) E.Schmidt bis & Jordaan tree r
Family Combretaceae
Combretum apiculatum Sond. subsp. apiculatum tree f
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
29 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Combretum hereroense Schinz tree r
Combretum zeyheri Sond. tree f
Terminalia sericea Burch. ex DC. tree d u
Family Dracaenaceae
Sansevieria hyacinthoides succulent r
Family Ebenaceae
Diospyros lycioides Desf. subsp. lycioides shrub u
Euclea crispa (Thunb.) Gürke subsp. crispa tree u
Euclea linearis Zeyh. ex Hiern dwarf shrub r
Euclea natalensis A.DC. subsp. angustifolia F.White shrub r
Family Euphorbiaceae
Jatropha zeyheri Sond. herb r
Spirostachys africana Sond. tree LEMA r
Family Fabaceae
Acacia caffra (Thunb.) Willd. tree r
Acacia erubescens Welw. ex Oliv. tree
Acacia karroo Hayne tree d
Acacia nigrescens Oliv. tree u u
Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Delile subsp. kraussiana (Benth.) Brenan tree r
Acacia robusta Burch. subsp. clavigera (E.Mey.) Brenan tree r
Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn. subsp. africana Brenan & Brummitt tree r u
Peltophorum africanum Sond. tree r u
Pterocarpus rotundifolius (Sond.) Druce subsp. rotundifolius tree r
Schotia brachypetala Sond. tree r
Family Malvaceae
Dombeya rotundifolia (Hochst.) Planch. var. rotundifolia tree r
Grewia bicolor Juss. var. bicolor shrub r
Grewia flava DC. shrub u
Grewia flavescens Juss. shrub r
Waltheria indica L. dwarf shrub r
Family Olacaceae
Ximenia americana L. var. microphylla Welw. ex Oliv. shrub r
Family Oleaceae
Olea europaea L. subsp. africana (Mill.) P.S.Green tree f
Family Pedaliaceae
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
30 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Harpagophytum zeyheri Decne. subsp. zeyheri herb r
Family Poaceae
Aristida meridionalis Henrard grass u
Aristida adscensionis L. grass f
Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees grass f
Eragrostis sp. grass u
Heteropogon contortus (L.) Roem. & Schult. grass r r
Loudetia simplex (Nees) C.E.Hubb. grass u
Panicum maximum Jacq. grass u
Pogonarthria squarrosa (Roem. & Schult.) Pilg. grass r u
Family Portulacaceae
Talinum caffrum (Thunb.) Eckl. & Zeyh. herb r
Family Rhamnaceae
Ziziphus mucronata Willd. subsp. mucronata tree r
Family Rubiaceae
Pyrostria hystrix (Bremek.) Bridson shrub r
Family Sinopteridaceae
Pellaea calomelanos (Sw.) Link var. calomelanos fern r
Family Strychnaceae
Strychnos madagascariensis Poir. tree r
Family Velloziaceae
Xerophyta retinervis Baker dwarf shrub r
Family Verbenaceae
Lippia javanica (Burm.f.) Spreng. dwarf shrub r
Family Viscaceae
Viscum combreticola Engl. parasite r r
Family Vitaceae
Rhoicissus revoilii Planch. climber r
TOTAL 59 1 4 33 33
NT = Near Threatened d = dominant
NFA = National Forests Act f = frequent
LEMA = Limpopo Environmental Management Act u = uncommon
r = rare
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
31 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Appendix 2. Localities of confirmed conservation-important plant species
Species Site No. Threat Status
Protected Status
Latitude Longitude
Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra Staff Housing 1 NFA -23.94208 28.36278
Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra Staff Housing 1 NFA -23.94243 28.36302
Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra Staff Housing 1 NFA -23.94270 28.36304
Elaeodendron transvaalense Staff Housing 1 NT NFA -23.93672 28.36407
Spirostachys africana School 1 LEMA -23.93642 28.36410
Boscia albitrunca School 1 NFA -23.93777 28.36483
Elaeodendron transvaalense School 1 NT NFA -23.93717 28.36420
Elaeodendron transvaalense School 1 NT NFA -23.93713 28.36398
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
32 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Appendix 3. Potentially occurring plant species of conservation concern
Species Family Red Data
Status Habitat Likelihood Reason
Justicia minima Acanthaceae Rare Rocky riverbeds Low Unsuitable habitat
Boophone disticha Amaryllidaceae Declining Wide habitat tolerance Low All suitable habitat searched
Crinum macowanii Amaryllidaceae Declining Grassland Low Unsuitable habitat
Crinum stuhlmannii Amaryllidaceae Declining Savanna and grassland in sandy soils
Low Marginal distribution, unsuitable habitat
Brachystelma inconspicuum Apocynaceae Rare Open quartzitic grassland
Low Unsuitable habitat
Ilex mitis var. mitis Aquifoliaceae Declining Forest Low Unsuitable habitat
Elaeodendron transvaalensis Celastraceae Near
Threatened Woodland, often on rocky slopes
Confirmed
Euphorbia louwii Euphorbiaceae Rare Sandstone ridges Low Occurs to the north of the study area
Euphorbia waterbergensis Euphorbiaceae Rare Quartzitic ridges in bushveld
Low All suitable habitat searched
Acacia erioloba Fabaceae Declining Arid plains savanna Low Unsuitable habitat
Gunnera perpensa Gunneraceae Declining Wetlands Low Unsuitable habitat
Drimia altissima Hyacinthaceae Declining Rocky grassland Low All suitable habitat searched
Drimia sanguinea Hyacinthaceae Declining Rocky grassland and savanna
Moderate Some suitable habitat present
Eucomis autumnalis subsp. clavata
Hyacinthaceae Declining Wide habitat tolerance Low Marginal distribution, unsuitable habitat
Hypoxis hemerocallidea Hyacinthaceae Declining Wide habitat tolerance Low Some suitable habitat present
Ansellia africana Orchidaceae Declining Savanna Low All suitable habitat searched
Adenia gummifera var. gummifera
Passifloraceae Declining Forest and thicket Low Marginal distribution, unsuitable habitat
Freylinia tropica Scrophulareaceae Rare Streambanks Low Unsuitable habitat
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
33 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Appendix 4. Checklist of fauna confirmed during fieldwork
Common Name Scientific Name Red Data
En
dem
ic
Pro
tecte
d:
Nati
on
al
Pro
tecte
d:
Pro
vin
cia
l
Bro
ad
-leav
ed
Wo
od
lan
d
Aca
cia
Wo
od
lan
d
Mammals
ORDER: PRIMATES
Family Cercopithecidae (Old World monkeys)
Vervet Monkey Chlorocebus pygerythrus x
ORDER: LAGOMORPHA
Family Leporidae (rabbits and hares)
Scrub Hare Lepus saxatilis x
ORDER: CARNIVORA
Family Hyaenidae (hyaenas)
Brown Hyaena Parahyaena brunnea NT NEMBA
(PR) LEMA
x
ORDER: TUBULIDENTATA
Family Orycteropodidae (Aardvark)
Aardvark Orycteropus afer NEMBA
(PR) LEMA
x
ORDER: PERRISODACTYLA
Family Equidae (horses)
Plains / Burchell's Zebra Equus quagga burchellii NEMBA
(PR)
x
ORDER: CETARTIODACTYLA
Family Hippopotamidae (hippopotamus)
Hippopotamus Hippopotamus amphibius VU* LEMA x
Family Bovidae (cattle & antilopes)
Kudu Tragelaphus strepsiceros x
Gemsbok Oryx gazella x
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
34 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Waterbuck Kobus ellipsiprymnus x
Subtotal 9 2 0 3 3 2 7
Birds
ORDER: GALLIFORMES
Family Phasianidae (pheasants, fowl and allies)
Crested Francolin Dendroperdix sephaena x
ORDER: PELECANIFORMES
Family Threskiornithidae (ibises and spoonbills)
Hadeda Ibis Bostrychia hagedash x
Family Ardeidae (herons and bitterns)
Western Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis x
ORDER: ACCIPITRIFORMES
Family Accipitridae (kites, hawks and eagles)
Black-chested Snake Eagle Circaetus pectoralis x
ORDER: COLUMBIFORMES
Family Columbidae (pigeons and doves)
Red-eyed Dove Streptopelia semitorquata x
Laughing Dove Spilopelia senegalensis x
Emerald-spotted Wood Dove Turtur chalcospilos x x
ORDER: CUCULIFORMES
Family Cuculidae (cuckoos)
Diederik Cuckoo Chrysococcyx caprius x
Red-chested Cuckoo Cuculus solitarius x
ORDER: CAPRIMULGIFORMES
Family Caprimulgidae (nightjars)
Rufous-cheeked Nightjar Caprimulgus rufigena x
ORDER: APODIFORMES
Family Apodidae (swifts)
African Palm Swift Cypsiurus parvus x
ORDER: COLIIFORMES
Family Coliidae (mousebirds)
Red-faced Mousebird Urocolius indicus x x
ORDER: CORACIIFORMES
Family Coraciidae (rollers)
Purple Roller Coracias naevius x
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
35 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Lilac-breasted Roller Coracias caudatus x
Family Alcedinidae (kingfishers)
Brown-hooded Kingfisher Halcyon albiventris x
Family Meropidae (bee-eaters)
European Bee-eater Merops apiaster x x
ORDER: BUCEROTIFORMES
Family Upupidae (hoopoes)
African Hoopoe Upupa africana x
ORDER: PICIFORMES
Family Lybiidae (African barbets)
Yellow-fronted Tinkerbird Pogoniulus chrysoconus x
Black-collared Barbet Lybius torquatus x
ORDER: PASSERIFORMES
Family Malaconotidae (bushshrikes)
Orange-breasted Bushshrike Chlorophoneus sulfureopectus x
Black-backed Puffback Dryoscopus cubla x x
Southern Boubou Laniarius ferrugineus x
Family Laniidae (shrikes)
Southern Fiscal Lanius collaris x
Family Oriolidae (figbirds and orioles)
Black-headed Oriole Oriolus larvatus x
Family Dicruridae (drongos)
Fork-tailed Drongo Dicrurus adsimilis x
Family Paridae (tits and chickadees)
Southern Black Tit Parus niger x
Family Alaudidae (larks)
Rufous-naped Lark Mirafra africana x
Family Pycnonotidae (bulbuls)
Dark-capped Bulbul Pycnonotus tricolor x x
Yellow-bellied Greenbul Chlorocichla flaviventris x
Family Hirundinidae (swallows and martins)
Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica over over
Lesser Striped Swallow Cecropis abyssinica over
Red-breasted Swallow Cecropis semirufa over
Family Macrosphenidae (crombecs and African warblers)
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
36 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Long-billed Crombec Sylvietta rufescens x
Family Cisticolidae (cisticolas and allies)
Rattling Cisticola Cisticola chiniana x x
Neddicky Cisticola fulvicapilla x
Tawny-flanked Prinia Prinia subflava x
Bar-throated Apalis Apalis thoracica x
Grey-backed Camaroptera Camaroptera brevicaudata x
Family Zosteropidae (white-eyes)
Cape White-eye Zosterops virens x
Family Sturnidae (starlings)
Cape Glossy Starling Lamprotornis nitens x
Violet-backed Starling Cinnyricinclus leucogaster x
Family Turdidae (thrushes)
Kurrichane Thrush Turdus libonyanus x
Family Muscicapidae (chats and Old World flycatchers)
White-browed Scrub Robin Erythropygia leucophrys x x
Grey Tit-Flycatcher Myioparus plumbeus x
Cape Robin-Chat Cossypha caffra x
Family Nectariniidae (sunbirds)
Amethyst Sunbird Chalcomitra amethystina x
White-bellied Sunbird Cinnyris talatala x x
Family Passeridae (Old World sparrows)
Southern Grey-headed Sparrow Passer diffusus x
Family Ploceidae (weavers and widowbirds)
Southern Masked Weaver Ploceus velatus x
Red-headed Weaver Anaplectes rubriceps x
Family Motacillidae (wagtails and pipits)
Bushveld Pipit Anthus caffer x
Family Fringillidae (finches and canaries)
Yellow-fronted Canary Crithagra mozambica x x
Family Emberizidae (buntings and New World sparrows)
Golden-breasted Bunting Emberiza flaviventris x
Subtotal 53 0 0 0 0 30 33
Reptiles
Family Scincidae (skinks)
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
37 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Variable Skink Trachylepis varia x
Family Lamprophiidae (African snakes) x
Short-snouted Grass Snake Psammophis brevirostris
Subtotal 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
NT = Near Threatened
VU = Vulnerable
NFA = National Forests Act
LEMA = Limpopo Environmental Management Act
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
38 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Appendix 5. Potentially occurring fauna of conservation concern
Common Name Scientific Name
Red
Data
Pro
tecte
d
Habitat Likelihood Reason
Mammals
Cheetah Acinonyx jubatus VU NEMBA
(VU) Wide variety of habitats Low
May occasionally wander through
Cape Clawless Otter Aonyx capensis LEMA Rivers and streams Moderate Suitable habitat present adjacent to the study area
South African Hedgehog Atelerix frontalis NT LEMA Arid grassland and savanna Low Limited suitable habitat present
African Civet Civettictis civetta LEMA Wide variety of habitats High Suitable habitat present
Blue Wildebeest Connochaetes taurinus NEMBA
(PR) Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
Reddish-grey Musk Shrew Crocidura cyanea DD Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
Tiny Musk Shrew Crocidura fuscomurina DD Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
Lesser Red Musk Shrew Crocidura hirta DD Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
Peters’ Musk Shrew Crocidura silacea DD Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
Spotted Hyaena Crocuta crocuta NT NEMBA
(PR) Wide variety of habitats Low Low density
Short-snouted Elephant-shrew Elephantulus brachyrhynchus DD Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
Burchell's Zebra Equus quagga burchelli NEMBA
(PR) Wide variety of habitats Confirmed
Black-footed Cat Felis nigripes NEMBA
(PR) Open grassland and shrubland Low
Limited suitable habitat present
African Wild Cat Felis silvestris LEMA Wide variety of habitats High Suitable habitat present
Southern Lesser Galago Galago moholi LEMA Savanna High Suitable habitat present
Yellow-spotted Rock Hyrax Heterohyrax brucei LEMA Rocky woodland Low No suitable habitat present
Hippopotamus Hippopotamus amphibius VU LEMA Wetlands Confirmed
Botswana Long-eared Bat Laephotis botswanae VU Savanna, rocky outcrops Low No known roosts in South Africa
Single-striped Grass-Mouse Lemniscomys rosalia DD Woodland with tall grass Low Unsuitable habitat
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
39 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Serval Leptailurus serval NT NEMBA
(PR) Grassland, wetlands Low
Limited suitable habitat present
African Wild Dog Lycaon pictus EN NEMBA
(EN) Wide variety of habitats Low
May occasionally wander through
Honey Badger Mellivora capensis NT LEMA Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
Forest Shrew Myosorex varius DD Wide variety of habitats Low Edge of distribution range
Klipspringer Oreotragus oreotragus LEMA Rocky woodland Low No suitable habitat present
Aardvark Otycteropus afer NEMBA
(PR) Wide variety of habitats Confirmed
Bat-eared Fox Otocyon megalotis LEMA Semi-desert, arid woodland and grassland
Low Unsuitable habitat present
Thick-tailed Greater Galago Otolemur crassicaudatus LEMA Moist woodland and forest Moderate Suitable habitat present
Leopard Panthera pardus NT NEMBA
(PR) Wide variety of habitats Low
May occasionally wander through
Brown Hyaena Parahyaena brunnea NT NEMBA
(PR) Wide variety of habitats Confirmed
Rusty Bat Pipistrellus rusticus NT Savanna, riparian forest, tree dwelling Moderate Suitable habitat present
African Weasel Poecilogale albinucha DD Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
Jameson’s Red Rock Rabbit Pronolagus randensis LEMA Rocky slopes in savanna Low No suitable habitat present
Aardwolf Proteles cristatus LEMA Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
Steenbok Raphicerus campestris LEMA Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
Sharpe's Grysbok Raphicerus sharpei NT NEMBA
(PR) Broad-leaved Woodland Low No suitable habitat present
Mountain Reedbuck Redunca fulvorufula LEMA Grassland and open woodland on slopes
Moderate Limited suitable habitat present
Ground Pangolin Smutsia temminckii VU NEMBA
(VU) Wide variety of habitats Low Increasingly rare species
Bushveld Gerbil Tatera leucogaster DD Woodland, thicket Moderate Suitable habitat present
Cape Fox Vulpes chama NEMBA
(PR) Open grassland and shrubland Low
Limited suitable habitat present
Subtotal 39 22 28
Birds
Tawny Eagle Aquila rapax EN NEMBA
(EN) Savanna Low
Unsuitable habitat and very rare in area
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
40 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Verreauxs' Eagle Aquila verreauxii VU Mountains and surrounding vegetation Low Unsuitable habitat present
Abdim's Stork Ciconia abdimii NT Open arid woodland and grassland Low Unsuitable habitat present
Black Stork Ciconia nigra VU Forages in wetlands and breeds on cliffs
Low Unsuitable habitat present
European Roller Coracias garrulus NT Savanna Moderate Suitable habitat present
Lanner Falcon Falco biarmicus VU Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
Red-footed Falcon Falco vespertinus NT Arid savanna and grasslands Low No suitable habitat present
White-backed Vulture Gyps africanus EN NEMBA
(EN) Savanna Low Low density
Cape Vulture Gyps coprotheres EN NEMBA
(EN) Mountains and surrounding vegetation Low Low density
Marabou Stork Leptoptilos crumeniferus NT Wetlands, savanna Low Limited suitable habitat present, disturbance
Denham’s Bustard Neotis denhami VU NEMBA
(VU) Grassland Low No suitable habitat present
Martial Eagle Polemaetus bellicosus EN NEMBA
(EN) Wide variety of habitats Moderate Suitable habitat present
African Finfoot Podica senegalensis VU Rivers with over-hanging vegetation
Low Limited suitable habitat present
Secretarybird Sagittarius serpentarius VU Open savanna and grassland Low No suitable habitat present
Lappet-faced Vulture Torgos tracheliotos EN NEMBA
(EN) Savanna Low Low density
Subtotal 15 15 6
Reptiles
Nile Crocodile Crocodylus niloticus VU NEMBA
(VU) Waterbodies Low Unsuiatble habitat present
Orange-throated Flat Lizard Platysaurus monotropis EN Sandstone outcrops Low Only known from a very small area to the NE of the study area
Southern African Python Python natalensis NEMBA
(PR) Wide variety of habitats, but usually near water or rocky outcrops
High Suitable habitat present
Subtotal 3 2 2
TOTAL 57 39 36
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) Nov 2016
41 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
EN = Endangered
VU = Vulnerable
NT = Near-threatened
DD = Data Deficient
PR = Protected
NEMBA = National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
42 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Appendix 6. Duncan McKenzie CV
Name: Duncan Robert McKenzie
Profession: Terrestrial Ecologist
Date of Birth: 9 Nov 1977
Name of Firm: ECOREX Consulting Ecologists cc
Position in Firm:Ecologist
Years with firm: 8
Nationality: South African
Qualifications :
N.Dip. [Nature Conservation]
N.Cert. [Nature Guiding]
UNISA, RSA
Drumbeat Academy, RSA
2007
2004
Membership in Professional Societies:
BirdLife South Africa
Animal Demography Unit, University of Cape Town
Botanical Society of South Africa
Languages :
Speaking Reading Writing
English (home): Excellent Excellent Excellent
Afrikaans: Good Good Good
isiZulu: Good Fair Fair
Spanish: Fair Fair Fair
Countries of Work Experience : Botswana, Lesotho, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland,
Zimbabwe (Guiding). South Africa, Mozambique, DRC, Mali, Lesotho, Tanzania, Swaziland, Sierra Leone
(Consulting Ecologist)
OVERVIEW OF EXPERIENCE
9 years’ experience in specialist species identification, conducting baseline surveys, data analysis and
report writing in various biomes in southern Africa, particularly savannah, forest and grassland biomes
2 years experience game reserve management (KwaZulu-Natal)
5 years’ experience (part time) of wetland delineation and management
2 years experience of plant propagation and use for rehabilitation
Specialist knowledge of identification of vascular plants
Specialist knowledge of identification of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians
SABAP2 Regional Co-ordinator: Mpumalanga
Member of the Kwa-Zulu-Natal Bird Rarities Committee
Employment Record:
2007 - present ECOREX Ecologist
2005 - 2006 Iglu (London, UK) Specialist Travel Agent
1997 - 2005 Duncan McKenzie Bird Tours Owner, Specialist Guide
2001 KZN Wildlife District Conservation Officer, Reserve
Manager
1999 - 2001 Institute of Natural Resources Part-time Horticulturalist and Rehabilitation
Officer
1997-2001 Mondi Wetlands Project Part-time Field Assistant and Regional Co-
ordinator
1996-1997 Natal Parks Board Ranger
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
43 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
Appendix 7. Specialist Declaration Form
10.4 The Specialist Note: Duplicate this section where there is more than one specialist. I …Duncan McKenzie…, as the appointed specialist hereby declare/affirm the correctness of the information provided as part of the application, and that I:
in terms of the general requirement to be independent (tick which is applicable):
X other than fair remuneration for work performed/to be performed in terms of this application, have no business, financial, personal or other interest in the activity or application and that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity; or
am not independent, but another EAP that is independent and meets the general requirements set out in Regulation 13 has been appointed to review my work (Note: a declaration by the review specialist must be submitted);
have expertise in conducting specialist work as required, including knowledge of the Act, regulations and any guidelines that have relevance to the proposed activity;
will ensure compliance with the EIA Regulations 2014;
will perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the application;
will take into account, to the extent possible, the matters listed in regulation 18 of the regulations when preparing the application and any report, plan or document relating to the application;
will disclose to the proponent or applicant, registered interested and affected parties and the competent authority all material information in my possession that reasonably has or may have the potential of influencing any decision to be taken with respect to the application by the competent authority or the objectivity of any report, plan or document to be prepared by myself for submission to the competent authority (unless access to that information is protected by law, in which case I will indicate that such protected information exists and is only provided to the competent authority);
declare that all the particulars furnished by me in this form are true and correct;
am aware that it is an offence in terms of Regulation 48 to provide incorrect or misleading information and that a person convicted of such an offence is liable to the penalties as contemplated in section 49B(2) of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act 107 of 1998).
Signature of the specialist ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC Name of company 05/12/2016 Date
LAPALALA SCHOOL TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY STUDY & BIODIVERSITY VALUE ASSESSMENT (ECOREX)
Nov 2016
44 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected]
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
We declare that we have been appointed as independent consulting ecologists with no
affiliation with or vested financial interests in the proponent, other than for work performed
under the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010. We have no conflicting
interests in the undertaking of this activity and have no interests in secondary developments
resulting from the authorisation of this project. Remuneration for our services by the
proponent is not linked to approval by any decision-making authority responsible for
authorising this development. A specialist declaration form has been completed and included
in Appendix 3.
W.L.McCleland 05 December 2016
D.R. McKenzie 05 December 2016