Land Market Monitoring: Beyond Land Supply Gerrit-Jan Knaap Professor and Director National Center...
-
Upload
alban-barton -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Land Market Monitoring: Beyond Land Supply Gerrit-Jan Knaap Professor and Director National Center...
Land Market Monitoring: Beyond Land Supply
Gerrit-Jan KnaapGerrit-Jan KnaapProfessor and DirectorProfessor and Director
National Center for National Center for Smart Growth Research and Smart Growth Research and
EducationEducationUniversity of MarylandUniversity of Maryland
Monitoring InfrastructureMonitoring Infrastructure
Points, lines, and polygonsPoints, lines, and polygons
The concept of service capacityThe concept of service capacity
The concept of capacity consumptionThe concept of capacity consumption
MonitoringMonitoringSchool Systems and PlansSchool Systems and Plans
StreetsSchools
Possible Routes
10 Minute Walk Area0.50 Mile Area
I74Future school
0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Miles
N
Monitoring School Monitoring School Systems and PlansSystems and Plans
Leal Elementary SchoolEXISTING PLANNED
CAPACITY 300 300ENROLLMENT 270 270COMMITED 10PROJECTED -60
AVAILABLE 30 90Units in students
MonitoringMonitoringPark Systems and PlansPark Systems and Plans
StreetsParksI74Streets within buffer zoneO.5 mile buffer of parks
N
0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Miles
Monitoring Park Monitoring Park Systems and PlansSystems and Plans
King (Neighborhood)Park
FACILITY ACRES PLAYGROUNDSWIMMING POOL
PICNIC AREA ………
SUPPLY 4.6 1 0 2 ………CAPACITY 4600 ………SERVICE POPULATION 3000 ………
AVAILABLE 1600 ……… NRPA Standard = 1acre/1000populataion, 1/2 mile Service Area
#
#
#
##
#
##
#
#
##
#
#
#
StreetsI74
SewersInterceptorsCollectors
# Pumping Stations
N
0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Miles
EXISTING PLANNEDCAPACITY 750,000 750,000IN USE 189,000 189,000COMMITTED 443,000 279,000PROPOSAL 252,000
AVAILABLE 118,000 30,000
EXISTING PLANNEDCAPACITY 750,000 750,000IN USE 189,000 189,000COMMITTED 443,000 279,000PROPOSAL 252,000
AVAILABLE 118,000 30,000
EXISTING PLANNEDCAPACITY 750,000 750,000IN USE 189,000 189,000COMMITTED 443,000 279,000PROPOSAL 252,000
AVAILABLE 118,000 30,000
EXISTING PLANNEDCAPACITY 750,000 750,000IN USE 189,000 189,000COMMITTED 443,000 279,000PROPOSAL 252,000
AVAILABLE 118,000 30,000
EXISTING PLANNEDCAPACITY 750,000 750,000IN USE 189,000 189,000COMMITTED 443,000 279,000PROPOSAL 252,000
AVAILABLE 118,000 30,000
EXISTING PLANNEDCAPACITY 750,000 750,000IN USE 189,000 189,000COMMITTED 443,000 279,000PROPOSAL 252,000
AVAILABLE 118,000 30,000
Monitoring Sewer Monitoring Sewer Systems and PlansSystems and Plans
EXISTING PLANNEDCAPACITY 750,000 750,000IN USE 189,000 189,000COMMITTED 443,000PROJECTED 531,000
AVAILABLE 118,000 30,000Units in Gallons per day
MonitoringMonitoringRoad Systems and PlansRoad Systems and Plans
.-,74
(/45
(/150
StreetsArterial StreetsUS HighwaysI74I74 Ramps N
0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Miles
Monitoring Road Monitoring Road Systems and PlansSystems and Plans
Lincoln Avenue between Lincoln Avenue between Pennsylvania and FloridaPennsylvania and Florida
EXISTING PLANNED WIDTH 55 55TRIP CAPACITY 15,000 15,000IN USE 14,000 14,000COMMITTED 0PROJECTED 2000
AVAILABLE 1000 -1000Units in Average Daily Trips
Monitoring Monitoring Residential Land MarketsResidential Land Markets
Population, Acres, Housing units,Population, Acres, Housing units,
Annexations, building permits, zone Annexations, building permits, zone changeschanges
Days of inventoryDays of inventory
Residential Development, 1996 - 2000Residential Development, 1996 - 2000
1996 34,076 1532.517 278.54 257.44 709.25 78.679 … 14.384 14,214 6,546 1581 1312 47751997 34,243 1612.779 278.78 259.77 710.04 153.98 … 15.830 14,301 6,564 1589 1340 48081998 34,872 2202.526 279.29 643.3 717.16 303.13 … 15.830 15,017 6,589 1591 1373 54641999 2212.151 280.91 648.66 717.94 304.78 … 16.030 15,090 6,624 1593 1373 55002000 4152.482 2221.125 282.17 653.1 718.96 307.18 … 16.591 15,191 6,662 1593 1378 5558
5-Yr Growth Rate 8.99% 0.26% 30.74% 58.08%0.27% 0.15% 1.01% 3.28%3.07% 1.37% 0.35%
YearPopula
tionDeveloped
AcresDeveloped
Residential AcresMOR Acres
R-1 Acres
R-2 Acres
R-3 Acres
R-4 Acres …
…
10 + Units
Housing Units
One Unit
2-4 Units
5-9 Units
Residential Vacant Tracts, 1996 - 2000Residential Vacant Tracts, 1996 - 2000
Year Acres Tracts Acres Tracts Acres Tracts1996 748.884 85 610.256 17 138.628 681997 740.965 79 604.312 17 136.653 621998 776.860 44 616.881 22 159.979 221999 771.123 45 612.795 23 158.328 222000 761.663 46 604.620 24 157.043 22
Total Additions 399.947 6 195.108 2 204.839 4Total Consumption 275.160 14 107.742 7 167.418 7Net Subtraction -124.787 8 -87.366 5 -37.421 3Annual Consumption Rate 68.790 3.5 26.936 1.75 41.854 1.75Largest Annual Consumption 197.570 11 107.742 7 89.828 4Years of Inventory 7.405 14.688 2.718
Total S/F M/F
Residential Vacant Lots, 1996 - 2000Residential Vacant Lots, 1996 - 2000
…Year Acres Lots Acres Lots Acres Lots Acres Lots Acres Lots … Acres Lots
1996 -50.527 246 8.256 24 -95.888 66 19.358 93 6.211 18 … 2.988 131997 -50.510 257 8.014 23 -93.222 84 19.515 96 5.247 15 … 1.542 81998 134.002 471 11.634 34 80.938 259 18.371 96 13.654 44 … 1.542 81999 132.821 463 10.009 29 79.657 249 17.589 92 16.360 56 … 1.342 72000 132.717 473 8.754 25 83.393 269 17.358 91 15.252 55 … 0.781 5
Total Additions 306.176 369 4.127 13 195.373 289 1.635 11 104.652 54 … 0.000 0Total Consumption 32.857 139 3.629 12 16.091 80 3.635 14 5.536 19 … 2.207 8Net Subtraction -273.319 -230 -0.498 -1 -179.282 -209 2.000 3 -99.116 -35 … 2.207 8Annual Consumption Rate 8.214 34.75 0.907 3.00 4.023 20.00 0.909 3.50 1.384 4.75 … 0.552 2.00Largest Annual Consumption 9.954 41 1.625 5 5.367 27 1.440 5 2.393 9 … 1.446 5Years of Inventory 16.157 9.649 20.730 19.100 11.021 … 1.415
Total R-1 R-2 R-3 MORR-4
Housing Starts, Maryland CountiesHousing Starts, Maryland Counties
Sources: Census and National Association of Homebuilders Sources: Census and National Association of Homebuilders
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
Year
Bu
ildin
g P
erm
its
Anne Arundel County
Baltimore City
Baltimore County
Calvert County
Carroll County
Cecil County
Charles County
Frederick County
Harford County
How ard County
Montgomery County
Prince George's County
Queen Anne's County
St. Mary's County
Talbot County
Washington County
Housing Starts, RegionsHousing Starts, Regions
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
Year
Bu
ildin
g P
erm
its
United States
Northeast Region
Midw est Region
South Region
West Region
Sources: Census and National Association of Homebuilders Sources: Census and National Association of Homebuilders
Metro Median Sales Price of Single Family Homes Metro Region in Inflation Adjusted
$: 1969 - 1999
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
Year
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
Calendar Year
Me
dia
n S
ale
s P
rice
in
199
8 $
amount
UGBCreated
FunctionalPlan Approved
Monitoring Housing PricesMonitoring Housing Prices
Existing Single Family Home Existing Single Family Home Prices, RegionsPrices, Regions
Source: National Association of Homebuilders Source: National Association of Homebuilders
$50,000
$70,000
$90,000
$110,000
$130,000
$150,000
$170,000
$190,000
$210,000
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Med
ian
Exi
stin
g H
om
e P
rice
, 200
1$
United States
Northeast Region
Midw est Region
South Region
West Region
New Single Family Home Prices, New Single Family Home Prices, RegionsRegions
Source: Census New Residential Sales IndexSource: Census New Residential Sales Index
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$160,000
$180,000
$200,000
$220,000
$240,000
$260,000
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
Med
ian
New
Ho
me
Pri
ce, 2
001$
United States
Northeast Region
Midw est Region
South Region
West Region
House Price IndexHouse Price Index
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
ytd
9/20
02
Ind
ex V
alu
e
United States
South Atlantic Division
Maryland
Virginia
District of Columbia
Baltimore MSA
Washington MSA
Source: Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) Source: Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO)
Existing Single Family Home Existing Single Family Home Prices, Maryland CountiesPrices, Maryland Counties
Sources: Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. and National Association of Sources: Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. and National Association of Homebuilders Homebuilders
$50,000
$70,000
$90,000
$110,000
$130,000
$150,000
$170,000
$190,000
$210,000
$230,000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Med
ian
Exi
stin
g H
om
e P
rice
, 200
1$
South Region
Maryland
Baltimore City
Anne Arundel County
Baltimore County
Calvert County
Carroll County
Cecil County
Charles County
Frederick County
Harford County
How ard County
Montgomery County
Prince George's County
Queen Anne's County
St. Mary's County
Talbot County
Washington County
Monitoring Rents Monitoring Rents Table 1Share of Renter Households Paying Excess or Severe Cost Burdens, 1990Cleveland PMSA
Renter Income (as a % of HAMFI)0-30% 30-50% 50-80%
Excess Cost Burden (paying over 30% of income for housing)Entire metropolitan area 74% 70% 33%Central city only 73% 57% 16%Suburbs only 77% 81% 42%
Severe Cost Burden (paying over 50% of income for housing)Entire metropolitan area 58% 21% 3%Central city only 55% 10% 1%Suburbs only 66% 30% 4%
Source: 1990 Census as reported in the CHAS database, 1993.
Monitoring AffordabilityMonitoring Affordability
A. Share of Renter Households Paying Excess or Severe Cost BurdensBy Income, 1992 and 1996Cleveland PMSA
$1 to $9,999 $10,000 to $19,999 $20,000 to $29,999
1992, Share paying over:30% of income 71% 54% 21%50% of income 46% 10% 3%
1996, Share paying over:30% of income 72% 73% 28%50% of income 51% 21% 3%
Source: American Housing Survey for the Cleveland Metropolitan Area, 1992 and 1996
Note: Percentages are calculated excluding those paying 100% or more of incomefor housing.
B. HAMFI Income Limits for the Cleveland Metropolitan Area4 person family
Income of Families and Primary Individuals
Monitoring Housing SupplyMonitoring Housing Supply
Table 3Housing Supply MeasuresCleveland PMSA, 1992 and 1996
1992 1996 2000Fair Market Rent Levels (2 bedroom unit)* 480 510 619
Share of Units Renting for less than $500** 1992 19962 Bedroom Units--Metropolitan Area 65% 45%All Units-Cleveland 89% 75%All Units-Rest of Cuyahoga Co. 54% 33%
Median rents 1992 19962 Bedroom Units--Metropolitan Area 449$ 519$ All Units-Cleveland 343$ 402$ All Units-Rest of Cuyahoga Co. 486$ 567$
Sources: HUD User Web Site and American Housing Survey for the ClevelandMetropolitan Area, 1992 and 1996
*Prior to 1995, FMRs were calculated at the 45th percentile of the distribution.They are now calculated at the 40th percentile.
**Percentages are calculated excluding those paying no cash rent.
Monitoring Housing “Match”Monitoring Housing “Match”
Table 4Rental Housing MismatchCleveland PMSA
Income as a Share of the HAMFI Threshold30% or less 50% or less 80% or less
Entire metropolitan area 0.76 1.37 1.66Central city only 0.85 1.50 1.43Suburbs only 0.56 1.17 1.92
(1) Street Design and (1) Street Design and Circulation Systems:Circulation Systems:
• Int_ConnectivityInt_Connectivity – ratio of the – ratio of the number of street intersections number of street intersections versus the sum of intersections versus the sum of intersections and cul-de-sacs (Criterion, 1999);and cul-de-sacs (Criterion, 1999);
Internal ConnectivityInternal Connectivity
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Year
Int_
Con
nect
ivity
_Cla
ckm
as_O
R
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Year
Int_
Co
nn
ecit
ivit
y_M
ult
no
mah
_OR
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Year
Int_
Co
nn
ecti
vity
_Was
hin
gto
n_O
R
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Year
Int_
Co
nn
ecti
vity
_Mo
ntg
om
ery_
MD
(1) Street Design and (1) Street Design and Circulation Systems Circulation Systems (Continued):(Continued):
• Ext_ConnectivityExt_Connectivity – median – median distance between Ingress/Egress distance between Ingress/Egress (access) points in feet (Criterion, (access) points in feet (Criterion, 1999); 1999);
(1) Street Design and Circulation (1) Street Design and Circulation Systems (Continued):Systems (Continued):
• Blocks_PeriBlocks_Peri – median value of perimeter – median value of perimeter of the blocks in a neighborhood; of the blocks in a neighborhood;
• BlocksBlocks – number of blocks divided by – number of blocks divided by number of housing units;number of housing units;
(1) Street Design and Circulation (1) Street Design and Circulation Systems (Continued):Systems (Continued):
• Length_Cul-De-Sac_ StLength_Cul-De-Sac_ St – median value – median value of length of cul-de-sac streets; of length of cul-de-sac streets;
• Rt_Cul-De-Sac_UnitsRt_Cul-De-Sac_Units – proportion of – proportion of housing units that are located by the housing units that are located by the Cul-De-Sacs in a neighborhood;Cul-De-Sacs in a neighborhood;
(2) Pedestrian Walkability (2) Pedestrian Walkability Characteristics:Characteristics:
• Ped_ComPed_Com – percentage of SFR units – percentage of SFR units within walkable distance of within walkable distance of commercial uses; commercial uses;
• Ped_TransitPed_Transit – percentage of SFR units – percentage of SFR units within walkable distance of transit within walkable distance of transit stations; stations;
(3) Land-use Characteristics:(3) Land-use Characteristics:
• Mix Mix – actual area of commercial, – actual area of commercial, industrial and public land uses in the industrial and public land uses in the neighborhood divided by number of neighborhood divided by number of housing units in a neighborhood; housing units in a neighborhood;
(3) Land-use Characteristics (3) Land-use Characteristics (Continued):(Continued):
• Lot_sizeLot_size – the median value of the area of – the median value of the area of lot size in square foot in a neighborhood;lot size in square foot in a neighborhood;
• Pop_Denisty – Pop_Denisty – the number ofthe number of households households divided by the area of the neighborhood;divided by the area of the neighborhood;
• SFRDU_DensitySFRDU_Density – SFR housing units – SFR housing units divided by the area of the neighborhood; divided by the area of the neighborhood;
(4) Accessibility (4) Accessibility Characteristics: Characteristics:
• ComdisComdis – distance in feet to the – distance in feet to the nearest commercial use;nearest commercial use;
• BusdisBusdis – distance in feet to the – distance in feet to the nearest bus station; nearest bus station;
• ParkdisParkdis – distance in feet to the – distance in feet to the nearest park; nearest park;
Urban Form Measurements (Unit of measurements)
Forest Glen
Orenco Station
Trend of changes Price Premium of Orenco
(1) Street Design and Circulation Systems:
Internal Connectivity_Beta 1.22 1.45Decreased until 1990, then
reversed+
External Street Connectivity (feet between access points) 569 1016
Increased all the time +
Length_Street (feet) 95 204 No change +
Block Perimeter (feet) 3365 830Increased until 1991, then
reversed+
Number of Blocks per Housing Unit 0.026 0.15
Decreased until 1992, then reversed
+
Median Length of Cul-De-Sacs (feet) 203 106
Decreased all the time +
(2) Density:
Lot Size (Square feet) 86753500
Decreased all the time -
Floor Space (Square feet) 1911 1648 Increased all the time -
Pop_Density (#person/acre) 2.02 2.62No change -
DU_Density (#Units/acre) 5.14 11.93
Increased all the time, but expedited after 1990
-
Urban Form Measurements (Unit of measurements)
Forest Glen
Orenco Station
Trend of changes Price Premium of Orenco
(3) Land Use Mix:
Entropy Index Including SFR area (1 = evenly distributed) 0.20 0.37
No change -
Entropy Index Excluding SFR area (1 = evenly distributed) 0.20 0.30
No change +
(4) Accessibility Characteristics:
Median Linear Distance to Nearest Commercial Use (feet) 3184 834
Decreased until 1990, then reversed
-
Median Distance to Nearest Park (feet) 1267 873
Decreased all the time +
(5) Pedestrian Walkability:
Percent of SFR Units within ¼-Mile Network Distance of Commercial Use 4 78
Decreased until 1990, then reversed
+
Percent of SFR Units within ¼-Mile Network Distance of Bus Stops 34 100
Decreased until 1993, then reversed
-
Better Information leads to Better Information leads to Better Land Management Better Land Management
DecisionsDecisions Infrastructure CapacityInfrastructure Capacity Housing Market IndicatorsHousing Market Indicators
Prices, Starts, VacancyPrices, Starts, Vacancy Urban FormUrban Form
Connectivity, Land Use, Density, Connectivity, Land Use, Density, AccessibilityAccessibility
Better Decisions leads to Better Better Decisions leads to Better Urban EnvironmentsUrban Environments