KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10

KPI Difference Between RAN12.0and RAN10.0

Issue 01

Date 2009-12-25

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

Copyright © Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Trademarks and Permissions

and other Huawei trademarks are trademarks of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All other trademarks and trade names mentioned in this document are the property of their respective holders. Notice The purchased products, services and features are stipulated by the contract made between Huawei and the customer. All or part of the products, services and features described in this document may not be within the purchase scope or the usage scope. Unless otherwise specified in the contract, all statements, information, and recommendations in this document are provided "AS IS" without warranties, guarantees or representations of any kind, either express or implied. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Every effort has been made in the preparation of this document to ensure accuracy of the contents, but all statements, information, and recommendations in this document do not constitute the warranty of any kind, express or implied.

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.

Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian, Longgang Shenzhen 518129 People's Republic of China

Website: http://www.huawei.com

Email: [email protected]

Issue 01 (2009-12-25) Huawei Proprietary and Confidential Copyright © Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd

iii

http://www.huawei.com/

mailto:[email protected]

KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10.0 Contents


v

Contents

1 KPI Addition...............................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 E-FACH RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell) ....................................................................................................1-1 1.2 EFACH Traffic Volume.................................................................................................................................1-1 1.3 CS over HSPA RAB Setup Success Ratio.....................................................................................................1-2 1.4 Cell Unavailability duration ..........................................................................................................................1-2 1.5 HSDPA Unavailability duration ....................................................................................................................1-3 1.6 HSUPA Unavailability duration ....................................................................................................................1-3 1.7 Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2D)..................................................................................1-4 1.8 PS Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell) ..........................................................................................................1-4 1.9 CS Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell)..........................................................................................................1-5 1.10 CS RAB Setup Success Ratio (RNC)..........................................................................................................1-5 1.11 PS RAB Setup Success Ratio (RNC) ..........................................................................................................1-6 1.12 HSDPA 64QAM RAB Setup Success Ratio................................................................................................1-6 1.13 HSDPA MIMO RAB Setup Success Ratio..................................................................................................1-7 1.14 HSDPA DC RAB Setup Success Ratio .......................................................................................................1-7 1.15 HSDPA MIMO64QAM RAB Setup Success Ratio ....................................................................................1-8 1.16 Mean Number of MBMS Users ..................................................................................................................1-8 1.17 Mean Number of HSDPA Users..................................................................................................................1-9 1.18 Mean Number of HSUPA Users..................................................................................................................1-9 1.19 Mean Number of E-FACH Users ..............................................................................................................1-10 1.20 Mean Number of Users for CS Over HSPA ..............................................................................................1-10 1.21 Mean Number of Users for HSDPA 64QAM............................................................................................1-11 1.22 Mean Number of Users for HSDPA MIMO..............................................................................................1-11 1.23 Mean Number of Users for HSDPA MIMO64QAM.................................................................................1-12 1.24 Mean Number of users for HSUPA 16QAM.............................................................................................1-12 1.25 PS Service Drop Ratio (RNC)...................................................................................................................1-13

2 KPI Modification........................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Counter names were changed........................................................................................................................2-1

2.1.1 Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell) ......................................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 RRC Setup Success Ratio (Cell.Service) .............................................................................................2-1 2.1.3 AMR RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell) ................................................................................................2-2 2.1.4 PS RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell) ....................................................................................................2-2

Contents KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10.0

vi Huawei Proprietary and Confidential Copyright © Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd

Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

2.1.5 Congested Cell Ratio ...........................................................................................................................2-3 2.1.6 Soft Handover Overhead (RNC)..........................................................................................................2-3 2.1.7 Soft Handover Success Ratio (RNC) ...................................................................................................2-3 2.1.8 Soft Handover Success Ratio (Cell).....................................................................................................2-4 2.1.9 Softer Handover Success Ratio (RNC) ................................................................................................2-4 2.1.10 Softer Handover Success Ratio (Cell)................................................................................................2-4 2.1.11 Service Cell Change Success Ratio with SHO (H2H) .......................................................................2-5 2.1.12 H2D Channel Handover Success Ratio..............................................................................................2-5 2.1.13 D2H Channel Handover Success Ratio..............................................................................................2-5 2.1.14 Intra-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (RNC) ......................................................................2-5 2.1.15 Intra-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2H).......................................................................2-6 2.1.16 Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (RNC) ......................................................................2-6 2.1.17 Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (Cell)........................................................................2-6 2.1.18 Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2H).......................................................................2-7 2.1.19 CS W2G Inter-RAT Handover Out Success Ratio (RNC) .................................................................2-7 2.1.20 PS W2G Inter-RAT Handover Out Success Ratio (RNC)..................................................................2-7 2.1.21 SRNC Relocation Success Ratio........................................................................................................2-7 2.1.22 TRNC Relocation Success Ratio........................................................................................................2-8 2.1.23 E-DCH Soft Handover Success Ratio................................................................................................2-8 2.1.24 E-DCH Service Cell Change Success Ratio with SHO .....................................................................2-9 2.1.25 E-DCH Service Cell Change Success Ratio with Inter-HHO ............................................................2-9 2.1.26 E2D Channel Handover Success Ratio ..............................................................................................2-9 2.1.27 D2E Channel Handover Success Ratio ..............................................................................................2-9 2.1.28 E-DCH to DCH Handover Success Ratio (with Inter HHO) ...........................................................2-10 2.1.29 HSUPA W2G Inter-RAT Handover Out Success Ratio....................................................................2-10 2.1.30 AMR Call Drop Ratio ......................................................................................................................2-10 2.1.31 VP Call Drop Ratio ..........................................................................................................................2-11 2.1.32 HSUPA Service Drop Ratio .............................................................................................................2-11

2.2 Counters were changed ...............................................................................................................................2-11 2.2.1 Average CPU Load.............................................................................................................................2-11 2.2.2 CS Service Drop Ratio.......................................................................................................................2-12 2.2.3 Average UL BLER for CS Service.....................................................................................................2-12 2.2.4 Mean Number of CS Users (RNC) ....................................................................................................2-12 2.2.5 Mean Number of CS Users (Cell) ......................................................................................................2-13 2.2.6 UL Traffic Volume of QoS Classes ....................................................................................................2-13 2.2.7 DL Traffic Volume of QoS Classes ....................................................................................................2-14 2.2.8 MBMS Service Throughput...............................................................................................................2-15 2.2.9 Radio Network Unavailability ...........................................................................................................2-15 2.2.10 HSDPA Service Drop Ratio .............................................................................................................2-16

2.3 The formula was changed............................................................................................................................2-16 2.3.1 AMR Traffic Drop Ratio (RNC) ........................................................................................................2-16 2.3.2 AMR Traffic Drop Ratio (Cell)..........................................................................................................2-16

KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10.0 Contents


vii

2.3.3 VP Traffic Drop Ratio (RNC) ............................................................................................................2-17 2.3.4 VP Traffic Drop Ratio (Cell)..............................................................................................................2-17

3 KPI Deletion ...............................................................................................................................3-1 3.1 DL RLC Average Retransmission Ratio........................................................................................................3-1 3.2 MBMS Service Channel Number..................................................................................................................3-1

KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10.0


ix

Keywords

RAN, KPI, Performance Management

Abstract

The purpose of this document is given a list of the RAN KPI definition difference between RAN12.0 and RAN10.0, the difference types including addition, modification and deletion.

List of abbreviations:

Abbreviation Full Spelling

PM Performance Management

KPI Key Performance Indicator

RAN Radio Access Network

HSDPA High Speed Downlink Packet Access

HSDSCH High Speed Downlink shared channel

RAT Radio Access Technology

E-FACH Enhance-Forward Access Channel

DC Dual Cell

MIMO Multiple Input Multiple Output

KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10.0 1 KPI Addition


1-1

1 KPI Addition

1.1 E-FACH RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell) E-FACH RAB Setup Success Ratio KPI Name

CELL Measurement Scope

E-FACH RAB Setup Success Ratio=(Successful PS RAB Setup on Formula E-FACH /Attempts of PS RAB Setup on E-FACH )*100%

Associated Counters

E-FACH RAB Setup Success Ratio=(VS.RAB.SuccEstPS.EFACH/VS.RAB.AttEstPS.EFACH)*100%

Notes The RNC level KPI is calculated by aggregating all the cell counters.

Change reason： New feature evaluating

1.2 EFACH Traffic Volume

Impact: None

KPI Name E-FACH Traffic Volume


Number of Downlink MAC PDU Bytes for traffic on the E-FACH over ce

Formula the Iub Interfa

Associated Counters

VS.CRNCIubBytesEFACH.Tx

Notes Unit: byte

Change reason：New feature evaluating

1 KPI Addition KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10.0

1-2 Huawei Proprietary and Confidential Copyright © Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd

Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

Impact: None

1.3 CS over HSPA RAB Setup Success Ratio CS over HSPA RAB Setup Success Ratio KPI Name

This KPI can be used to evaluate the RAB setup success ratio of the CS over HSPA service in a RNC or a cluster.

Description

CS over HSPA RAB Setup Success Ratio=(CS over HSPA RAB Setup Success/CS over HSPA RAB Setup Attempt)*100%

Formula

Associated Counters ab

.CS.Conv)*100%

CS over HSPA RAB Setup Success Ratio=(VS.HSPA.RAB.SuccEstab.CS.Conv/VS.HSPA.RAB.AttEst

Notes The RNC level KPI is calculated by aggregating all the cell counters.


1.4 Cell Unavailability duration

Impact: None

Cell Unavailability duration KPI Name

This KPI can be used to evaluate accumulated unavailability duration of ult in a measurement period

Description the cell caused by system fa

Formula unavailability duration of a cell caused by system fault in the RNC

Associated Counters

ailTime.SysVS.Cell.Unav

Notes Unit: s

Change reason：Updates for Cell evaluating

Impact: None



1-3

1.5 HSDPA Unavailability duration KPI Name HSDPA Unavailability duration

This KPI can be used to evaluate accumulated the HSDPA service unavailability duration of the cell caused by system fault in a measurement period.

Description

HSDPA service unavailability duration of a cell caused by system fault in the RNC.

Formula

VS.Hsdpa.UnavailTimeAssociated Counters

Unit: s Notes


Impact: None

1.6 HSUPA Unavailability duration KPI Name HSUPA Unavailability duration


HSUPA service unavailability duration of a cell caused by system fault in the RNC

Formula

VS.Cell.HSUPA.UnavailTime Associated Counters

Unit: s Notes


Impact: None



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

1.7 Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2D) KPI Name Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2D)


Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2H)=(H2H Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success/H2H Inter-frequency Hard Handover Attempt)*100%

Formula

Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2D)=(VS.HSDPA.HHO.H2D.SuccOutInterFreq/VS.HSDPA.HHO.H2D.AttOutInterFreq)*100%

Associated Counters

None Notes

Change reason：Updates for HSDPA evaluating

Impact: None

1.8 PS Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell) KPI Name PS Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell)


PS Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell) =PS RRC Setup Success Ratio(Cell)*PS RAB Setup Success Ratio(Cell)*100%

Formula

Associated Counters

PS Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell)= [(RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgBkgCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgItrCall+ RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmBkgCall+ RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmItrCall)/(RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgBkgCall+ RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgInterCall+ RRC.AttConnEstab.TmBkgCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.TmInterCall)]*PS RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell)*100%

None Notes

Change reason：Updates for KPI evaluating

Impact: None



1-5

1.9 CS Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell) KPI Name CS Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell)


CS Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell) =CS RRC Setup Success Ratio(Cell)*CS RAB Setup Success Ratio(Cell)*100%

Formula

Associated Counters

CS Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell) =[(RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgConvCall+ RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmConvCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.EmgCall)/ (RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgConvCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.TmConvCall)+ RRC.AttConnEstab.EmgCall)]*CS RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell)*100%

Notes The RNC level KPI is calculated as follows: [(RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgConvCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmConvCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.EmgCall)/ (RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgConvCall+ RRC.AttConnEstab.TmConvCall+ RRC.AttConnEstab.EmgCall)]*CS RAB Setup Success Ratio (RNC)*100%


Impact: None

1.10 CS RAB Setup Success Ratio (RNC) KPI Name CS RAB Setup Success Ratio (RNC)

RNC Measurement Scope

CS RAB Setup Success Ratio=(CS RAB Setup Success/CS RAB Setup Attempt)*100%

Formula

CS RAB Setup Success Ratio (RNC)=[(VS.RAB.SuccEstabCS.Conv.RNC+VS.RAB.SuccEstabCS.Str.RNC)/(VS.RAB.AttEstabCS.Conv.RNC+VS.RAB.AttEstabCS.Str.RNC)]*100%

Associated Counters

None Notes



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)


Impact: None

1.11 PS RAB Setup Success Ratio (RNC) KPI Name PS RAB Setup Success Ratio (RNC)

RNC Measurement Scope

Formula PS RAB Setup Success Ratio (RNC)=(PS RAB Setup Success/ PS RAB Setup Attempt)*100%

Associated Counters

PS RAB Setup Success Ratio (RNC)=[(VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Bkg.RNC+VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Str.RNC+ VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Conv.RNC+VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Int.RNC) /(VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Conv.RNC+VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Bkg.RNC+ VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Int.RNC+VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Str.RNC)]*100%

None Notes


Impact: None

1.12 HSDPA 64QAM RAB Setup Success Ratio KPI Name HSDPA 64QAM RAB Setup Success Ratio


HSDPA 64QAM RAB Setup Success Ratio=(HSDPA 64QAM RAB Setup Success/HSDPA 64QAM RAB Setup Attempt)*100%

Formula

Associated Counters

HSDPA 64QAM RAB Setup Success Ratio=(VS.HSDPA.RAB.64QAM.SuccEstab /VS.HSDPA.RAB.64QAM.AttEstab)*100%

The RNC level KPI is calculated by aggregating all the cell counters Notes


Impact: None



1-7

1.13 HSDPA MIMO RAB Setup Success Ratio KPI Name HSDPA MIMO RAB Setup Success Ratio


HSDPA MIMO RAB Setup Success Ratio=(HSDPA MIMO RAB Setup Success/HSDPA MIMO RAB Setup Attempt)*100%

Formula

Associated Counters

HSDPA MIMO RAB Setup Success Ratio=(VS.HSDPA.RAB.MIMO.SuccEstab /VS.HSDPA.RAB.MIMO.AttEstab)*100%

The RNC level KPI is calculated by aggregating all the cell counters Notes


Impact: None

1.14 HSDPA DC RAB Setup Success Ratio KPI Name HSDPA DC RAB Setup Success Ratio


HSDPA DC RAB Setup Success Ratio=(HSDPA DC RAB Setup Success/HSDPA DC RAB Setup Attempt)*100%

Formula

HSDPA DC RAB Setup Success Ratio=(VS.HSDPA.RAB.DC.SuccEstab/VS.HSDPA.RAB.DC.AttEstab)*100%

Associated Counters

The RNC level KPI is calculated by aggregating all the cell counters. Notes


Impact: None



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

1.15 HSDPA MIMO64QAM RAB Setup Success Ratio KPI Name HSDPA MIMO64QAM RAB Setup Success Ratio


HSDPA MIMO64QAM RAB Setup Success Ratio=(HSDPA MIMO64QAM RAB Setup Success/HSDPA MIMO64QAM RAB Setup Attempt)*100%

Formula

HSDPA MIMO64QAM RAB Setup Success Ratio=(VS.HSDPA.RAB.MIMO64QAM.SuccEstab/VS.HSDPA.RAB.MIMO64QAM.AttEstab)*100%

Associated Counters

The RNC level KPI is calculated by aggregating all the cell counters. Notes


Impact: None

1.16 Mean Number of MBMS Users KPI Name Mean Number of MBMS Users


Formula Mean number of MBMS users in PTP channel in a cell Mean number of MBMS users in PTM channel in a cell

Associated Counters

VS.MBMS.PTP.UE.Channel0.Mean.Cell; VS.MBMS.PTM.UE.Channel0.Mean.Cell; VS.MBMS.PTP.UE.Channel1.Mean.Cell; VS.MBMS.PTM.UE.Channel1.Mean.Cell; VS.MBMS.PTP.UE.Channel2.Mean.Cell; VS.MBMS.PTM.UE.Channel2.Mean.Cell; VS.MBMS.PTP.UE.Channel3.Mean.Cell; VS.MBMS.PTM.UE.Channel3.Mean.Cell; VS.MBMS.PTP.UE.Channel4.Mean.Cell; VS.MBMS.PTM.UE.Channel4.Mean.Cell

None Notes

Change reason：Updates for MBMS evaluating

Impact: None



1-9

1.17 Mean Number of HSDPA Users KPI Name Mean Number of HSDPA Users


Mean Number of HSDPA Users in a Cell Formula

VS.HSDPA.UE.Mean.CellAssociated Counters

The KPI should be collected at busy hour. Notes

Change reason： Updates for KPI evaluating

Impact: None

1.18 Mean Number of HSUPA Users KPI Name Mean Number of HSUPA Users


Mean Number of HSUPA Users in a cell Formula

VS.HSUPA.UE.Mean.CellAssociated Counters



Impact: None



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

1.19 Mean Number of E-FACH Users KPI Name Mean Number of E-FACH Users


Mean Number of Users that in cell E-FACH state Formula

VS.EFACHUEs Associated Counters



Impact: None

1.20 Mean Number of Users for CS Over HSPA KPI Name Mean Number of Users for CS Over HSPA


Mean Number of Users for CS Over HSPA in a cell. Formula

VS.HSPA.UE.Mean.CS.Conv.Cell Associated Counters



Impact: None



1-11

1.21 Mean Number of Users for HSDPA 64QAM KPI Name Mean Number of Users for HSDPA 64QAM


Mean Number of Users for HSDPA 64QAM in a cell. Formula

VS.HSDPA.64QAM.UE.Mean.CellAssociated Counters



Impact: None

1.22 Mean Number of Users for HSDPA MIMO KPI Name Mean Number of Users for HSDPA MIMO


Mean Number of Users for HSDPA MIMO in a cell. Formula

VS.HSDPA.MIMO.UE.Mean.CellAssociated Counters



Impact: None



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

1.23 Mean Number of Users for HSDPA MIMO64QAM KPI Name Mean Number of Users for HSDPA MIMO64QAM


Mean Number of Users for HSDPA MIMO64QAM in a cell. Formula

VS.HSDPA.MIMO64QAM.UE.Mean.CellAssociated Counters



Impact: None

1.24 Mean Number of users for HSUPA 16QAM KPI Name Mean Number of users for HSUPA 16QAM


Mean Number of users for HSUPA 16QAM in a cell. Formula

VS.HSUPA.16QAM.UE.Mean.CellAssociated Counters



Impact: None



1-13

1.25 PS Service Drop Ratio (RNC) KPI Name PS Service Drop Ratio (RNC)


PS Service Drop Ratio (RNC)=(PS RAB Abnormal Release/PS RAB Release)*100%

Formula

Associated Counters

PS Service Drop Ratio (RNC)=[VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.RNC/(VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.RNC+VS.RAB.NormRel.PS.RNC)]*100%

None Notes


Impact: None

KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10.0 2 KPI Modification


2-1

2 KPI Modification

2.1 Counter names were changed 2.1.1 Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell)

vice)*{[(VS.RAB.SuccEstabCS.Conv+VS.RAB.SuccEstabCS.Str)+(VS.RAB.SuccEPS.Conv+VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Str+VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Inter+VS.RAB.SuccEstabP

+VS.RAB.AttEstabCS.Str)+(VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.ConvAttEstabPS.Inter+VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Bkg]}*100%

(Cell.Service)*{[(VS.RAB.SuccEstabCS.Conv+VS.RAB.SuccEstabCS.Str)+(VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Int+VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.

ttEstabCS.Conv+VS.RAB.AttEstabCS.Str)+(VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Conv+tr+VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Int+VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Bkg]}*100%

None.

2.1.2 RRC S .Service)

.AttConnEstab.TmConvCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.TmStrCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.TmInterCall+RRC.AttCon

tab.TmBkgCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.EmgCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.Unknown+RRC.AttC

From

Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell)

=RRC Setup Success Ratio (Cell.SerstabS.Bkg)]/[(VS.RAB.AttEstabCS.Conv+VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Str+VS.RAB.

To

Radio Access Success Ratio (Cell)

=RRC Setup Success Ratio

stabPS.Conv+VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Str+VS.RAB.SuccEBkg)]/[(VS.RAB.AVS.RAB.AttEstabPS.S

Change reason：Several counter names were changed.

Impact:

etup Success Ratio (CellFrom

RRC Setup Success Ratio (Cell.Service)

=[(RRC.SuccConnEstab.OgConvCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgStrCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgItrCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgBkgCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgSubCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmConvCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmStrCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmItrCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmBkgCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.EmgCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.Unkown+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OgHhPrSig+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OgLwPrSig+RRC.SuccConnEstab.CallReEst+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmHhPrSig+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmLwPrSig)/(RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgConvCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgStrCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgInterCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgBkgCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.OgSubCall+RRC

nEs

2 KPI Modification KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10.0


Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

onnEstab.OgHhPrSig+RRC.AttConnEstab.OgLwPrSig+RRC.AttConnEstab.CallReEst+RR

RRC.AttConnEstttConnEstab.TmInterCall+RRC.AttC

ConnEstab.Unknown+RRC.AttPrSig+RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgLwPrSig+RRC.AttConnEstab.CallReEst+

RRC.AttConnEstab.TmHhPrSig+RRC.AttConnEstab.TmLwPrSig)]*100%

None.

2.1.3 AMR RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell) m

AMR RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell)

=(VS.RAB.SuccEstabCS.AMR/VS.RAB.AttEstab.AMR)*100%

.

None.

2.1.4 PS RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell)

+VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Str+VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Inter+VSttEstabPS.Conv+VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Str+VS.RAB.Att

tr+VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Int+VS..Bkg)/(VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Conv+VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Str+VS.RAB.Att

EstabPS.Int+VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Bkg)]*100%


C.AttConnEstab.TmHhPrSig+RRC.AttConnEstab.TmLwPrSig)]*100%

To

RRC Setup Success Ratio (Cell.Service)

=[(RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgConvCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgStrCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgItrCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgBkgCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgSubCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmConvCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmStrCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmItrCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmBkgCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.EmgCall+RRC.SuccConnEstab.Unkown+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgHhPrSig+RRC.SuccConnEstab.OrgLwPrSig+RRC.SuccConnEstab.CallReEst+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmHhPrSig+RRC.SuccConnEstab.TmLwPrSig)/(RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgConvCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgStrCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgInterCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgBkgCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgSubCall+ab.TmConvCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.TmStrCall+RRC.AonnEstab.TmBkgCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.EmgCall+RRC.AttConnEstab.OrgHh


Impact:

Fro

AMR RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell)

=(VS.RAB.SuccEstab.AMR/VS.RAB.AttEstab.AMR)*100%

To

Change reason：The counter name was changed

Impact:

From

PS RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell)

=[(VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Conv.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Bkg)/(VS.RAB.AEstabPS.Inter+VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Bkg)]*100%

To

PS RAB Setup Success Ratio (Cell)

=[(VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.Conv+VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.SRAB.SuccEstabPS



2-3

Impact: None.

2.1.5 Conge ell Ratio

=(The Number Of Cells,In Which VS.LCC.OverCongNumUL>0 or LCC.OverCongNumDL>0 On Busy Hour/The Total Number Of Cells In RNC)*100%

=(The Number Of Cells,In Which VS.LCC.OLC.UL.Num>0 or VS.LCC.OLC.DL.Num>0 )*100%

unter names were changed.

2.1.6 Soft Handover Overhead (RNC)

S.SHO.AS.1+VS.SHO.AS.2Softer+VS.SHO.AS.2Soft+VS.SHO.AS.3Soft2Softer+VS.SHO.AS.3Soft+VS.SHO.AS.3Softer+VS.SHO.AS.4+VS.SHO.AS.5+VS.SHO.AS.6)-1}*

%

S.SHO.AS.2Soft.RNC+VS.SHO.AS.3Soft2Softer.RNC+VS.SHO.AS.3Soft.RNC+VS.SHO.AS.3Softer.RNC+VS.SHO.AS.4.RNC+VS.SHO.AS.5.RNC+VS.SHO.AS.6.RN


2.1.7 Soft Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

S.SHO.Succ/VS.SHO.Att.RNC)*100%

sted CFrom

Congested Cell Ratio

VS.

To

Congested Cell Ratio

On Busy Hour/The Total Number Of Cells In RNC

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

From

Soft Handover Overhead (RNC)

={[VS.SHO.AS.1+(VS.SHO.AS.2Softer+VS.SHO.AS.2Soft)*2+(VS.SHO.AS.3Soft2Softer+VS.SHO.AS.3Soft+VS.SHO.AS.3Softer)*3+VS.SHO.AS.4*4+VS.SHO.AS.5*5+VS.SHO.AS.6*6]/(V

100

To

Soft Handover Overhead (RNC)

={[VS.SHO.AS.1.RNC+(VS.SHO.AS.2Softer.RNC+VS.SHO.AS.2Soft.RNC)*2+(VS.SHO.AS.3Soft2Softer.RNC+VS.SHO.AS.3Soft.RNC+VS.SHO.AS.3Softer.RNC)*3+VS.SHO.AS.4.RNC*4+VS.SHO.AS.5.RNC*5+VS.SHO.AS.6.RNC*6]/(VS.SHO.AS.1.RNC+VS.SHO.AS.2Softer.RNC+V

C)-1}*100%

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

From

Soft Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

=(V

To

Soft Handover Success Ratio (RNC)



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

=(VS.SHO.Succ.RNC/VS.SHO.Att.RNC)*100%

Change reason：The counter name was changed.

2.1.8 Soft Handover Success Ratio (Cell)

ESide+SHO.SuccRLDelUESide)/(SHO.AttRLAddUESide+SHO.AttRESide)]*100%

dd+VS.SHO.SuccRLDel)/(VS.SHO.AttRLAdd+VS.SHO.AttRLDel)]*


2.1.9 Softer Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

S.SoHo.Succ/VS.SoHO.ASU.AttRNC)*100%

%


2.1.10 Softer Handover Success Ratio (Cell)

+VS.SoHO.ASU.SuccRlDel)/(VS.SoHO.ASU.AttRLAdd+VSAttRlDel)]*100%

)/(VS.SoHO.AttRLAdd+VS.SoHO.AttRLD


Impact: None.

From

Soft Handover Success Ratio (Cell)

=[(SHO.SuccRLAddULDelU

To

Soft Handover Success Ratio (Cell)

=[(VS.SHO.SuccRLA100%

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

From

Softer Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

=(V

To

Softer Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

=(VS.SoHO.Succ.RNC/VS.SoHO.Att.RNC)*100

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

From

Softer Handover Success Ratio (Cell)

=[(VS.SoHO.ASU.SuccRLAdd.SoHO.ASU.

To

Softer Handover Success Ratio (Cell)

=[(VS.SoHO.SuccRLAdd+VS.SoHO.SuccRLDelel)]*100%

Change reason：Co



2-5

Impact: None.

2.1.11 Servi ll Change Success Ratio with SHO (H2H)

S.HSDPA.SHO.CellChg.SuccOut/VS.HSDPA.SHO.CellChg.AttOut)*100%

DPA.SHO.ServCellChg.AttOut)*100%


2.1.12 H2D nel Handover Success Ratio

S.HSDPA.ChR.HSDSCHtoDCH/VS.HSDPA.ChR.HSDSCHtoDCH.Att)*100%

0%


2.1.13 D2H nel Handover Success Ratio

S.HSDPA.ChR.DCHtoHSDSCH /VS.HSDPA.ChR.DCHtoHSDSCH.Att)*100%

0%


2.1.14 Intra- ency Hard Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

ce CeFrom

Service Cell Change Success Ratio with SHO (H2H)

=(V

To

Service Cell Change Success Ratio with SHO (H2H)

=(VS.HSDPA.SHO.ServCellChg.SuccOut/VS.HS

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

ChanFrom

Channel Handover Success Ratio (H2D)

=(V

To

H2D Channel Handover Success Ratio

=(VS.HSDPA.H2D.Succ/VS.HSDPA.H2D.Att)*10

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

ChanFrom

Channel Handover Success Ratio (D2H)

=(V

To

D2H Channel Handover Success Ratio

=(VS.HSDPA.D2H.Succ/VS.HSDPA.D2H.Att)*10

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

frequFrom

Intra-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

=(VS.HHO.Succ.IntraFreq.RNC)/(VS.HHO.Att.IntraFreq.RNC)*100%

ntraFreq.RNC)*100%


2.1.15 Intra- ency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2H)

S.HSDPA.HHO.SuccOutIIntraFreq/VS.HSDPA.HHO.AttOutIIntraFreq)*100%

A.HHO.H2H.SuccOutIntraFreq/VS.HSDPA.HHO.H2H.AttOutIntraFreq)*100


2.1.16 Inter- ency Hard Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

S.HHO.InterFreq.Succ.RNC/VS.HHO.InterFreq.Att.RNC)*100%

erFreq.RNC)*100%


2.1.17 Inter- ency Hard Handover Success Ratio (Cell)

S.HHO.InterFreq.SuccOut/VS.HHO.InterFreq.AttOut)*100%

FreqOut)*100%

To

Intra-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

=(VS.HHO.SuccIntraFreq.RNC)/(VS.HHO.AttI

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

frequFrom

Intra-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2H)

=(V

To

Intra-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2H)

=(VS.HSDP%

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

frequFrom

Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

=(V

To

Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

=(VS.HHO.SuccInterFreq.RNC/VS.HHO.AttInt

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

frequFrom

Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (Cell)

=(V

To

Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (Cell)

=(VS.HHO.SuccInterFreqOut/VS.HHO.AttInter



2-7

Change reason：Counter names were changed.

2.1.18 Inter- ency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2H)

S.HSDPA.HHO.SuccOutInterFreq/VS.HSDPA.HHO.AttOutInterFreq)*100%

=(VS.HSDPA.HHO.H2H.SuccOutInterFreq/VS.HSDPA.HHO.H2H.AttOutInterFreq)*100


2.1.19 CS W nter-RAT Handover Out Success Ratio (RNC)

S.IRATHO.SuccCSOut.RNC/VS.IRATHO.AttCSOut.RNC)*100%

ttOutCS.RNC)*100%


2.1.20 PS W nter-RAT Handover Out Success Ratio (RNC)

S.IRATHO.SuccPSOutUTRAN.RNC/VS.IRATHO.AttPSOutUTRAN.RNC)*100%

THO.AttOutPSUTRAN.RNC)*100%


2.1.21 SRNC Relocation Success Ratio

Impact: None.

frequFrom

Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2H)

=(V

To

Inter-frequency Hard Handover Success Ratio (H2H)

%

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

2G IFrom

CS Inter-RAT Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

=(V

To

CS W2G Inter-RAT Handover Out Success Ratio (RNC)

=(VS.IRATHO.SuccOutCS.RNC/VS.IRATHO.A

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

2G IFrom

PS Inter-RAT Handover Success Ratio (RNC)

=(V

To

PS W2G Inter-RAT Handover Out Success Ratio (RNC)

=(VS.IRATHO.SuccOutPSUTRAN.RNC/VS.IRA

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

From



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

SRNC Relocation Success Ratio

=[(VS.SRELOC.SuccExec.UEInvCS.RNC+VS.SRELOC.SuccExec.UEInvPS.RNC+VS.SRELOC.SuccExec.UENonInvCS.RNC+VS.SRELOC.SuccExec.UENonInvPS.RNC)/(RELOC.AttPrepUEInvolCS+RELOC.AttPrepUENotInvolCS+RELOC.AttPrepUEInvolPS+RELOC.AttPrepU

tInvolPS)]*100%

ENotInvolCS+RELOC.SuccPrepUEInvolPS+RELOC.SuccPrepUE

Counters were changed.

2.1.22 TRNC Relocation Success Ratio

volPS+RELOC.AttResAllocUENotInvolCS+RELOttResAllocUENotInvolPS)]*100%

lCS+RELOC.SuccResAllocUEInvo0%


2.1.23 E-DCH Soft Handover Success Ratio

S.HSUPA.EDCH.SHO.Succ/VS.HSUPA.EDCH.SHO.Att)*100%

ttOut)*100%


ENo

To

SRNC Relocation Success Ratio

=[(VS.SRELOC.SuccExecUEInvolCS+VS.SRELOC.SuccExecUEInvolPS+VS.SRELOC.SuccExecUENonInvolCS+VS.SRELOC.SuccExecUENonInvolPS)/(RELOC.SuccPrepUEInvolCS+RELOC.SuccPrepUNotInvolPS)]*100%

Change reason：

Impact: None.

From

TRNC Relocation Success Ratio

=[(VS.TRELOC.SuccExec.UEInv+VS.TRELOC.SuccExec.UENotInv)/(RELOC.AttResAllocUEInvolCS+RELOC.AttResAllocUEInC.A

To

TRNC Relocation Success Ratio

=[(VS.TRELOC.SuccExecUEInvol+VS.TRELOC.SuccExecUENotInvol)/(RELOC.SuccResAllocUEInvolCS+RELOC.SuccResAllocUENotInvolPS+RELOC.SuccResAllocUENotInvolPS)]*10

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.

From

E-DCH Soft Handover Success Ratio

=(V

To

E-DCH Soft Handover Success Ratio

=(VS.HSUPA.SHO.SuccOut/VS.HSUPA.SHO.A

Change reason：Co

Impact: None.



2-9

2.1.24 E-DCm

ll Change Success Ratio with SHO .ServCellChg.SuccOut/VS.HSUPA.SHO.ServCellChg.AttOut)*100%

t: None.

2.1.25 E-DC o with Inter-HHO

CH Service Cell Change Success Ratio with Inter-HHO

.InterFreq.NoChR.Att)*100%

nter-HHO

.E2E.SuccOutInterFreq/VS.HSUPA.HHO.E2E.AttOutInterFreq)*100

t: None.

2.1.26 E2D C o

CH to DCH Handover Success Ratio (Intra Cell)

CH.Succ/VS.HSUPA.ChR.IntraCell.EDCHtoDCH.At

.Succ/VS.HSUPA.E2D.Att)*100%

t: None.

2.1.27 D2E C o

H to E-DCH Handover Success Ratio (Intra Cell)

H Service Cell Change Success Ratio with SHO Fro

E-DCH Service Cell Change Success Ratio with SHO=(VS.HSUPA.SHO.ServCellChg.Succ/VS.HSUPA.SHO.ServCellChg.Att)*100%

To

E-DCH Service Ce=(VS.HSUPA.SHO


Impac

H Service Cell Change Success RatiFrom

E-D

=(VS.HSUPA.HHO.InterFreq.NoChR.Succ/VS.HSUPA.HHO

To

E-DCH Service Cell Change Success Ratio with I

=(VS.HSUPA.HHO%


Impac

hannel Handover Success RatiFrom

E-D

=(VS.HSUPA.ChR.IntraCell.EDCHtoDt)*100%

To

E2D Channel Handover Success Ratio

=(VS.HSUPA.E2D


Impac

hannel Handover Success RatiFrom

DC



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

=(VS.HSUPA.ChR.IntraCell.EDCHtoDCH.Succ/VS.HSUPA.ChR.IntraCell.EDCHtoDCH.At

D2E Channel Handover Success Ratio

e reason：Counter names were changed.

2.1.28 E-DCH to DCH Handover Sum

100%

ndover Success Ratio (with Inter HHO)

eq)*100

2.1.29 HSUPA W2G Inter-RAT Handover Out Success Ratio

S.HSUPA.IRATHO.SuccOutPSUTRAN/VS.HSUPA.IRATHO.AttOutPSUTRAN)*100%

-RAT Handover Out Success Ratio

OutPSUTRAN/VS.IRATHO.HSUPA.AttOutPSUTRAN)*100


2.1.30 AMR Call D

S.RAB.Loss.CS.AMR/(VS.RAB.Loss.CS.AMR+VS.RAB.Loss.CS.Norm.AMR)]*100%

tio

t)*100%

To

=(VS.HSUPA.D2E.Succ/VS.HSUPA.D2E.Att)*100%

Chang

Impact: None.

ccess Ratio (with Inter HHO) Fro

E-DCH to DCH Handover Success Ratio (with Inter HHO)

=(VS.HSUPA.ChR.InterFreq.EDCHtoDCH.Succ/VS.HSUPA.ChR.InterFreq.EDCHtoDCH.Att)*

To

E-DCH to DCH Ha

=(VS.HSUPA.HHO.E2D.SuccOutInterFreq/VS.HSUPA.HHO.E2D.AttOutInterFr%


Impact: None.

HSUPA Inter-RAT Handover Success Ratio (WCDMA to GPRS)

=(V

To

HSUPA W2G Inter

=(VS.IRATHO.HSUPA.Succ%

Chang

Impact: None.

rop Ratio From

AMR Call Drop Ratio

=[V

To

AMR Call Drop Ra



2-11

=[VS.RAB.AbnormRel.A%

MR/(VS.RAB.AbnormRel.AMR+VS.RAB.NormRel.AMR)]*100


2.1.31 VP C op Ratio

.Conv64K+VS.Norm.Rel.CS.Conv.RB.64)]

.AbnormRel.CS64+VS.RAB.NormRel.CS64)]*100%


2.1.32 HSUP

PA Service Drop Ratio

norm/(VS.HSUPA.RAB.Loss.Abnorm+VS.HSUPA.RAB.Loss.

HSUPA Service Drop Ratio

=[VS.HSUPA.RAB.AbnormRel/(VS.HSUPA.RAB.AbnormRel+VS.HSUPA.RAB.Normel+VS.HSUPA.HHO.E2D.SuccOutIntraFreq+VS.HSUPA.HHO.E2D.SuccOutInterFre

q+VS.HSUPA.E2F.Succ+VS.HSUPA.E2D.Succ)]*100%

were changed.

2.2 Counte2.2.1 Average CPU Lo

=VS.SPU.CPULOAD.MEAN

To

Chang

Impact: None.

all DrFrom

VP Call Drop Ratio

=[VS.RAB.Loss.CS.Conv64K/(VS.RAB.Loss.CS*100%

VP Call Drop Ratio

=[VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS64/(VS.RAB

Chang

Impact: None.

A Service Drop Ratio From

HSU

=[VS.HSUPA.RAB.Loss.AbNorm+VS.HSUPA.ChR.IntraCell.EDCHtoDCH.Succ+VS.HSUPA.ChR.IntraFreq.EDCHtoDCH.Succ+VS.HSUPA.ChR.InterFreq.EDCHtoDCH.Succ+VS.HSUPA.ChR.EDCHtoFACH.Succ)]*100%

To

R

Change reason：Counter names

Impact: None.

rs were changed ad

From

Average CPU Load



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

Average CPU Load=VS.XPU.CPULOAD.MEAN

e reason：The counter name was changed.

2.2.2 CS Serm

atio

el.CS+VS.RAB.NormRel.CS)]*100%


2.2.3 Averag for CS Service

ech Service UL Average BLER（KPI Name）：

64

VS.UlBler.AMR

VS.ULBler.CS64

rvice was changed, the counter for CS64 was changed;

2.2.4 Mean Number of CS Users (RNC)

earers(RNC) (KPI Name)

Chang

Impact: None.

vice Drop Ratio Fro

CS Service Drop Ratio

=[(VS.RAB.Loss.CS.Abnorm+VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF)/(VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF+VS.RAB.Loss.CS.Abnorm+VS.RAB.Loss.CS.Norm)]*100%

To

CS Service Drop R

=[VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS/(VS.RAB.AbnormR

Chang

Impact: None.

e UL BLERFrom

Spe

VS.ULBlerAMR

VS.ULBlerCSRT.

To

Average UL BLER for CS Service（KPI Name）：

Change reason：The counter name for AMR seservice

Impact: None.

From

DL Traffic of Typical Radio B

VS.AMR.RB.DL.12.2；

VS.RB.DLConvCS.64.RNC

To



2-13

Mean Number of CS Users (RNC) (KPI Name)

+VS.RB.AMR.DL.7.4.RNC+VS.RB.AMR.DL.7.95.RNC+VS.RB.AMR.

VS.RB.CS.Conv.DL.64.RNC

he counters with other bit rates of the AMR were added.

ions.

2.2.5 Mean Users (Cell)

Traffic of Typical Radio Bearers(Cell) (KPI Name):

.2+VS.RB.AMR.DL.10.2+VS.RB.AMR.DL.7.95+VS.RB.AMR.DL.7.4+VS.RB.AMR.DL.6.7+VS.RB.AMR.DL.5.9+VS.RB.AMR.DL.5.15+VS.RB.AMR.DL.4.75);

VS.RB.CS.Conv.DL.64

e counters with other bit rates of the AMR were added.

ever in the same conditions.

2.2.6 UL Tra oS Classes

；

L.128.Thruput

(VS.RB.AMR.DL.4.75.RNC+VS.RB.AMR.DL.5.15.RNC+VS.RB.AMR.DL.5.9.RNC+VS.RB.AMR.DL.6.7.RNCDL.10.2.RNC+VS.RB.AMR.DL.12.2.RNC);

Change reason：The KPI name was changed, tservice

Impact: The value may be greater than ever in the same condit

Number of CSFrom

DL

VS.AMR.Ctrl.DL12.2

VS.RB.DLConvCS.64

To

Mean Number of CS Users (Cell) (KPI Name):

(VS.RB.AMR.DL.12

Change reason：The KPI name was changed, thservice

Impact: The value may be greater than

ffic Volume of QFrom

(VS.AMR.Ctrl.UL12.2)*12.2K

VS.PS.Str.UL.64.Thruputt；

VS.PS.Int.UL.64.Thruput；




VS.PS.bkg.UL.64.Thruput；

VS.PS.bkg.U

VS.PS.bkg.UL.144.Thruput；

VS.PS.bkg.UL.384.Thruput

To



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

(VS.RB.AMR.UL.12.2*12.2K+VS.RB.AMR.UL.10.2*10.2K+VS.RB.AMR.UL.7.95*7.95k+VS.RB.AMR.UL.7.4*7.4K+VS.RB.AMR.UL.5.9*5.9K+VS.RB.AMR.UL.5.15*5.15K+VS.R

*60};

e reason：The counters with other bit rates of the AMR service were added.

than ever in the same conditions.

2.2.7 DL Traffic Volume of QoS Classes

K;

L.128.Thruput;

.2K+VS.RB.AMR.DL.10.2*10.2K+VS.RB.AMR.DL.7.95*7.95k+VS.RB.AMR.DL.5.9*5.9K+VS.RB.AMR.DL.5.15*5.15K+VS.RP*60};

B.AMR.UL.4.75*4.75K)*{SP

VS.PS.Str.UL.64.Traffic；

VS.PS.Int.UL.64.Traffic；




VS.PS.Bkg.UL.64.Traffic；



VS.PS.Bkg.UL.384.Traffic

Chang

Impact: The value may be greater

From

(VS.AMR.Ctrl.DL12.2)*12.2

VS.CS.Conv.DL.64.Thruput;

VS.PS.Str.DL.64.Thruput;



VS.PS.Int.DL.64.Thruput;




VS.PS.bkg.DL.64.Thruput;

VS.PS.bkg.D

VS.PS.bkg.DL.144.Thruput;

VS.PS.bkg.DL.384.Thruput

To

(VS.RB.AMR.DL.12.2*12VS.RB.AMR.DL.7.4*7.4K+B.AMR.DL.4.75*4.75K)*{S

VS.CS.Conv.DL.64.Traffic;



2-15

VS.PS.Str.DL.64.Traffic;



VS.PS.Int.DL.64.Traffic;




VS.PS.Bkg.DL.64.Traffic;



VS.PS.Bkg.DL.384.Traffic

Change reason：The counters with other bit rates of the AMR service were added.

er in the same conditions.

2.2.8 MBMSm

ell;

ell

eanThroughput;


Impact: None.

2.2.9 Radio m

Total Number Of Cells In RNC*{SP*60})*100%

navailability Ratio=(VS.Cell.UnavailTime.Sys>)/(The Total Number Of

Change reason：The counter was changed.

Impact: The value may be greater than ev

Service Throughput Fro

VS.MBMS.PTM.MeanThroughput.C

VS.MBMS.PTP.MeanThroughput.C

To

VS.MBMS.PTM.M

VS.MBMS.PTP.MeanThroughput

Network Unavailability Fro

Radio Network Unavailability Ratio

=(VS.Cell.UnavailTime.OM)/(The

To

Radio Network UCells In RNC*{SP*60})*100%

Impact: None.



Issue 01 (2009-12-25)

2.2.10 HSDPm

PA Service Drop Ratio

uccOutInterFreq)]*100

SDPA Service Drop atio=[(VS.HSDPA.RAB.AbnormRel)/(VS.HSDPA.RAB.AbnormRel+VS.HSDPA.RAB.

NormRel+VS.HSDPA.H2D.Succ+VS.HSDPA.H2F.Succ+VS.HSDPA.HHO.H2D.SuccOutIntraFreq+VS.HSDPA.HHO.H2D.SuccOutInterFreq)]*100%

hanged.

2.3 The formula was changed 2.3.1 AMR T NC)

R.DL.5.15.RNC+VS.RB.AMR.DL.5.9.RNC+VS.7.4.RNC+VS.RB.AMR.DL.7.95.RNC+VS.RB.AM

0.2.RNC+VS.RB.AMR.DL.12.2.RNC)*{SP}/60]/(VS.RAB.AbnormRel.AMR.RNC)

were changed.

act: More accurate to evaluate the KPI.

2.3.2 AMR Tr

.DL.10.2+VS.RB.AMR.DL.7.95+VS.RB.AMR.DL.7DL.5.9+VS.RB.AMR.DL.5.15+VS.RB.AMR.DL.4.7

}/60]/VS.RAB.AbnormRel.AMR

A Service Drop Ratio Fro

HSD

=[(VS.HSDPA.RAB.Loss.Abnorm.NonRF+VS.HSDPA.RAB.Loss.RF)/(VS.HSDPA.RAB.Loss.Abnorm.NonRF+VS.HSDPA.RAB.Loss.RF+VS.HSDPA.RAB.Loss.Norm+VS.HSDPA.RAB.Loss.InActivity+VS.HSDPA.ChR.HSDSCHtoDCH+VS.HSDPA.ChR.HSDSCHtoFACH+VS.HSDPA.HHO.H2D.SuccOutIntraFreq+VS.HSDPA.HHO.H2D.S%

To

HR

Change reason：The counters were c

Impact: None.

raffic Drop Ratio (RFrom

AMR_TDR=(VS.AMR.RB.DL.12.2*60)/∑(VS.RAB.Loss.CS.AMR)

To

AMR Traffic Drop Ratio (RNC)

=[(VS.RB.AMR.DL.4.75.RNC+VS.RB.AMRB.AMR.DL.6.7.RNC+VS.RB.AMR.DL.R.DL.1

Change reason：The formula was changed, all the counter names

Imp

affic Drop Ratio (Cell)From

AMR_TDR=(VS.AMR.Ctrl.DL12.2*60)/VS.RAB.Loss.CS.AMR

To

AMR Traffic Drop Ratio (Cell)

=[(VS.RB.AMR.DL.12.2+VS.RB.AMR.4+VS.RB.AMR.DL.6.7+VS.RB.AMR.5)*{SP



2-17

Change reason：The formula was changed, all the counter names were changed.


2.3.3 VP Tra NC) From

B.CS.Conv.DL.64.RNC*{SP}/60)/(VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS64.RNC)

ere changed.


2.3.4 VP Tra ell) From

VP_TDR=(VS.RB.DLConvCS.64 )/VS.RAB.Loss.CS.Conv64K

To

VP Traffic Drop Ratio (Cell)

=(VS.RB.CS.Conv.DL.64*{SP}/60)/VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS64

Change reason：The formula was changed, all the counter names were changed.

Impact: More accurate to evaluate the KPI.

Imp

ffic Drop Ratio (R

VP_TDR =(VS.RB.DLConvCS.64.RNC*60)/∑(VS.RAB.Loss.CS.Conv64K)

To

VP Traffic Drop Ratio (RNC)

=(VS.R

Change reason：The formula was changed, all the counter names w

Imp

ffic Drop Ratio (C

*60

KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10.0 3 KPI Deletion


3-1

3 KPI Deletion

3.1 DL RLChange reason：The counters were deleted.

nt services.

3.2 MBMS Service Channel Number Change reason：Deleted for semantic error.It was replaced by the new KPI of Mean Number of MBMS Users.

Impact: None.

C Average Retransmission Ratio

Impact: None, this KPI can be divided into differe

KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10

Documents

Transcript of KPI Difference Between RAN12.0 and RAN10