Khawar Kazmi. Thrombosis LipidsInflammation Thrombus Platelets and thrombin Quiescent Plaque Plaque...
-
Upload
marilyn-adams -
Category
Documents
-
view
230 -
download
0
Transcript of Khawar Kazmi. Thrombosis LipidsInflammation Thrombus Platelets and thrombin Quiescent Plaque Plaque...
Thrombosis
LipidsInflammation
Thrombus
Plateletsand thrombin
QuiescentPlaque
Plaque rupture
PATHOGENESISACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
• Oxygen
• Pain relief
• Beta blockers
• Nitrates
Supportive Specific
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMEOptimal Management
It is crucial to ensure prompt recognition and rapid delivery of care
• Anti Platelets
• Anti Coagulants
Clopidogrel Early use in all cases as benefit in all risk
categories with or without revascularization*
Loading dose 300 vs. 600mg# Reloading in NSTMI prior to PCI No benefit in stable angina+
*CURE, CREDO Trials#ARMYDA-2 Trial+CHARISMA Trial
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMEOptimal Management
DUAL ANTI PLATLET
Clopidogrel Resistance
Resistance vs. Treatment Failure: “NONRESPONSE”
Definite entity but wide variation (4 – 30%) Variable response to ADP Genetic Variability Positive interaction with Omega 3*
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMEOptimal Management
*J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMEOptimal Management
Data on PPI plus Clopidogrel show inconsistent risk of adverse outcome
Meta Analysis show no increased risk of CV events or mortality Ailment Pharmacol Ther.
2010
Clopidogrel and PPIs •Adding PPI to Clopidogrel increases re-hospitalization for MI/ stenting•Subgroup analysis reveals significant risk specifically with pantaprazole Arch Intern Med. 2010
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMEOptimal Management
Clopidogrel : Duration and cessation
• Halting Clopidogrel in ACS patients more than double risk of death / MI within 90 days vs. 91 – 360 days
• Tapering may help but more research needed Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010
• Similar rates of cardiac death, MI regardless of stopping clopidogrel after 12 months•Trend towards higher rates of MI, Stroke, or all cause death with prolonged dual therapy•Under powered study does not provide definite answer to issue of optimal duration
N Engl J Med. 2010
PRASUGREL More effective esp. in patients with
Clopidogrel Non Response Better primary efficacy endpoint (9.9 vs. 12.1%.. Triton- TIMI 38) Increased Bleeding including life
threatening (2.4 vs. 1.8%)But mainly in patients with H/O stroke or TIA,
patients >75 years and those with body weight <60kg
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMEOptimal Management
Ticagrelor
Ticagrelor more effective than Clopidogrel without increasing bleeding*
Lowers CV death, MI, Stroke vs. Clopidogrel in STEMI
Antiplatelet effect of Ticagrelor kicks in more rapidly than high dose Clopidogrel**
Ticagrelor improves platelet inhibition regardless of initial Clopidogrel response***
Urgent bypass pts on prior Ticagrelor have better survival than those on Clopidogrel*
*PLATO Trial. Lancet 2010 ** The ONSET/OFFSET Study ***Respond Study. Circulation 2010
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMEOptimal Management
CILOSTAZOL
Triple therapy lowers platelet response on VerifyNow assay but
Results do not translate to lower ischemic events in DES patients
CILON- T trial
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMEOptimal Management
LMWH vs. UFH
Enoxaparin vs. Foundaparinaux
Bivalirudin vs. GPIIb/IIIa plus
Heparin
Anticoagulants
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMEOptimal Management
Benefit-to-Risk Ratio of Antithrombotics in UA/NSTEMI in the Last Decade: Increased Efficacy at the Price of Increased Bleeding
16-20% 12-15% 8-12% 6-10% 4-8%Death
/ M
I
Bleeding
1988ASA
1992ASA+
Heparin
1998 ASA+
Heparin+Anti-
GPIIb/IIIa
2003ASA+
LMWH +Clopidogrel +Intervention
Major Bleeding is Associated with an Increased Risk of Hospital Death in ACS
Patients
Moscucci et al. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1815-23
GRACE Registry in 24,045 ACS patients
40
*After adjustment for comorbidities, clinical presentation and hospital therapies**p<0.001 for differences in unadjusted death rates
OR (95% CI) 1.64 (1.18 to 2.28*)
0
Overall ACS UA NSTEMI STEMI
10
20
30 **
****
**
5.1
18.6
3.0
16.1
5.3
15.3
7.0
22.8
In-h
os
pit
al d
ea
th (
%)
In hospital major bleeding Yes
No
Strong, Independent Association Between Bleeding and Death, MI and Stroke
OutcomeMajorBleed
No MajorBleed
Hazard (Adjusted)
P-Value
Death 60/470(12.8%)
833/33676(2.5%)
5.37(3.97-7.26)
<0.0001
MI46/436(10.6%)
1375/33710(4.1%)
4.44(3.16-6.24)
<0.0001
Stroke12/469
(2.6%)
187/33677
(0.6%)
6.46
(3.54-11.79)<0.0001
Eikelboom JW et al. Circulation 2006;114(8):774-82.
N = 34,126
OASIS Registry, OASIS-2, CURE
In Patients with UA/NSTEMI
1. Fondaparinux was as effective as enoxaparin in reducing the composite of death, MI or refractory ischemia at day 9
2. Fondaparinux significantly reduced the risk of death by 17% compared with enoxaparin at day 30 and this benefit was maintained at 6 months
3. Fondaparinux was associated with a significant 48% reduction in the risk of major bleeding versus enoxaparin
4. Consistent results were observed in every subgroup examined
5. Fondaparinux consistently reduced the rate of major bleeding irrespective of renal function and baseline risk
6. The lower rate of bleeding in fondaparinux-treated patients translated into a lower mortality rate
OASIS 5 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1464-76
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMEOptimal Management
Bivalirudin
• Bivalirudin alone compared to heparin and GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors resulted in comparable rates of MI and stent thrombosis, with significantly reduced rates of major bleeding and mortality(all cause and cardiac)
At 2 years•36% reduction in major bleeding and 25% reduction in reinfarction• 41% reduction in cardiac mortality and 25% reduction in all cause mortality•But the benefits were variable among the sub groups HORIZON AMI Trial
2007 AHA/ACC UA/NSTEMI Guidelines: Recommendation for Anticoagulation
Class I Recommendationsa) For patients in whom an invasive strategy is selected,
regimens with established efficacy include fondaparinux, enoxaparin, UFH or bivalirudin
b) For patients in whom a conservative strategy is selected, regimens with established efficacy include fondaparinux, enoxaparin or UFH
c) In patients in whom a conservative strategy is selected and who have an increased risk of bleeding, fondaparinux is preferable.
JACC 2007;50 (7):e1-157 LOA B for fonda and bivalirudin; A for enoxaparin or UFH