jyoti bajpai.pdf
Transcript of jyoti bajpai.pdf
1
1.0 Introduction
In vitro techniques have opened new doors in crop improvement. Several tissue
culture techniques have been developed in recent years that have commercial application
to a wide range of crops. In vitro techniques are used to screen large number of
genotypes at their early growth stages for various stresses. This technique is preferred
over field experiments because in these experiment -
1. environment is controlled
2. results are more accurate and reproducible
3. require less time and space
4. can be conducted at any time of year
Various types of biotic and abiotic stresses create a hazard to agriculture. These
stresses cause huge damage to crops and reduce economic profit all over the world. So to
increase crop productivity development of stress tolerant plants and genotypes are of
great importance. Traditional breeding methods and proper weed management strategies
play an important role in crop improvement. The conventional breeding techniques are
being used to incorporate desirable genes by intergeneric and interspecific hybridization
into the crops to induce stress tolerance. But little success has been achieved by
conventional breeding methods and they are not enough to provide desirable results
mainly due to the time and labor requirements (Purohit et al., 1998). Various methods
used for increasing and stabilizing production of black gram have helped in developing
varieties resistant to disease and pests, with other desirable agronomic traits. However,
genetic improvement of black gram by conventional breeding methods has met with
limited success due to the lack of sufficient and satisfactory level of genetic variability
within germplasm (Jaiwal and Gulati, 1995). Biotechnological techniques can address
the serious problems of crop improvement for sustainable agriculture due to short time in
which results become obvious.
1.1 In vitro Selection
Abiotic stress factors like drought, salinity, osmotic, heavy metals and pesticides
limit plant growth and productivity in agriculture. They cause changes at all levels
morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular which can negatively affect
plant growth and productivity (Wang et al., 2001). Plants have developed mechanisms to
withstand and also to adapt in such adverse conditions. Plants can countenance adverse
2
environmental conditions by regulating specific sets of genes in response to stress
signals, whose expression may vary according to severity of stress conditions, other
environmental factors, and the plant species (Wang et al., 2003). Among many
biotechnological techniques used in plant breeding in vitro selection through the
application of selective pressure in culture conditions, for developing stress tolerant
plants, have proved to be the most effective approaches (Sakhanokho and Kelley, 2009).
It is difficult to investigate the response of plants to different abiotic stresses in the field
or in greenhouse conditions, because of complex and variable nature of these stresses.
With the help of in vitro techniques we can also better understand the physiology and
biochemistry of plants cultured under adverse environmental conditions (Benderradji et
al., 2012).
Tissue culture based in vitro selection methods are practical and cost-effective for
developing stress-tolerant plants. Plants tolerant to any type of stress can be obtained by
adding the selecting agents such as NaCl (for salt tolerance), PEG or mannitol (for
drought tolerance), pathogen culture filtrate, phytotoxin or pathogen itself (for disease
resistance) and herbicides (for herbicide tolerance) in the culture media. Only the
explants capable of tolerating/surviving such modified stressful in vitro environments
can express organogenetic phenomenon and can be selected. In vitro selection is based
on induction of genetic variation among cells, tissues and/or organs in cultured and
regenerated plants (Rai et al., 2011). By in vitro culture of plant cells, tissues and organs
on medium containing selective agents, one can select and regenerate plants with
desirable characteristics. Tissue culture technique has also been successfully utilized to
induce stress tolerance which includes the addition of selection agents that allows the
preferential survival and growth of tolerant genotypes (Purohit et al., 1998). There are
two types of selection methods: (1) stepwise long-term treatment, in which cultures are
exposed to stress with gradual increase in concentrations of selecting agent and (b) shock
treatment, in which cultures are directly subjected to a shock of high concentration and
only those which would tolerate that level will survive (Purohit et al., 1998). In vitro
selection can considerably reduce the time for the selection of desirable characters under
selection pressure with least environmental interaction, and can be used in place of field
selection (Jain, 2001).
In vitro selection pressure technique is widely used for the selection of genotypes
tolerant to abiotic stress which is based on in vitro culture of plant cells, tissues or organs
on a medium supplemented with selective agents, allowing selecting and regenerating
3
plants with desirable characteristics (Pérez-Clemente and Gómez-Cadenas, 2012). The
regenerants that survive in the selection pressure under in vitro conditions can be
characterized at morphological and physiological levels.
Callus culture techniques have a distinct advantage in that tissue cells can be
exposed uniformly to a selection pressure incorporated in the medium and many putative
mutants can be recovered quickly and efficiently. The variations that have genetic basis
can be transmitted through seed in a predictable manner. Callus culture techniques for
the development of stress resistant lines in different crops have been utilized by a
number of scientists. Many workers reported stress tolerant genotypes /somaclones
induced through various types of stresses (Table- 2.2, 2.3).
In the cell culture selection technique, a suitable selection pressure is applied to
allow the preferential survival/growth of variant cells. This technique has been
successfully utilized to obtain genotypes resistant to various toxins, herbicides, high salt
concentration etc. (Zair et al., 2003) (Table-2.3).
Plant tissue culture methods help plant breeders by creating and manipulating
genetic variability. In vitro methods improve both crop quantity and quality by
increasing the plant tolerance against abiotic stresses as they limit crop productivity.
Genetic variation in black gram is also required to create cultivars that are highly
resistant to these stresses (Abdel-Raheem et al., 2007).
Elevation of the plant antioxidant defense system has been positively correlated
with abiotic stress tolerance (Rai et al., 2011) and the same is also true for in vitro
cultures (Lascano, 2001, Soni et al., 2012). Therefore, by assessing activities of
antioxidative enzymes in vitro, a speedy preliminary screening of tolerant genotypes
could be achieved. It has been reported that the main antioxidant enzymes such as
superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT) and
glutathione reductase (GR) can help in selection of stress tolerant plants (Hossain et al.,
2007).
Lipids play an important role as the structural component of cellular membranes
(Parida and Das, 2005). It is well documented that free radical-induced peroxidation of
lipid membrane is a symbol of stress-induced damage at cellular level. Therefore, the
level of malonyldialdehyde, produced during peroxidation of membrane lipids can be
used as an indicator of oxidative damage (Demiral and Turkan, 2005). Selected callus
lines of Solanum tuberosum subjected to NaCl showed an increase in lipid peroxidation
in comparison with salt tolerant lines (Queiros et al., 2007).
4
Among protective mechanisms used against abiotic stresses, osmotic adjustment
is of great importance in which there is accumulation of compatible solutes such as
proline, glycine betaine and polyols (Ghoulam et al., 2001). It has been also reported that
proline levels increased in response to water stress in tomato calli (Aazami et al., 2010).
Increase in proline content has been also reported in response to herbicide stress
(Parween et al., 2012, Huang et al., 2012, Fayez et al., 2011, Saladin et al., 2003a and El
Tayeb and Zaki, 2009).
Based on review of literature on plants responses to abiotic stress conditions, the
determination of antioxidant enzyme activities, and levels of malonyldialdehyde and
proline in plants recovered under selective conditions can be used as an important
parameter for identifying tolerance among genotypes.
Plant tolerance to abiotic stress has been linked with changes in proteome
composition. Since proteins are directly involved in plant stress response, proteomics
studies can help us to understand the possible correlation between protein abundance and
plant stress acclimation (Kosová et al., 2011). Metabolome analysis is also can be used to
study plant metabolic changes that occur in response to abiotic stresses. With the help of
metabolome analysis we can identify those compounds that are accumulated by exposure
to stress conditions. An integrated approach involving in vitro plant tissue, proteomics
and metabolomics technique, may help to explain the metabolites involved in stress
response and select desired genotypes at early stages of plant development or at callus
stage (Palama et al., 2010). In vitro cell and tissue-culture based systems provide a
significant method for studying physiological, biochemical and molecular aspects of
stress responses phenomenon and the results are being used for the development and
isolation of stress tolerant genotypes. In vitro selected genotypes should be finally field-
tested to confirm the genetic stability of the selected traits under field conditions. In vitro
selection associated with molecular approaches will provide a new opportunity to
improve stress tolerance in important crops related to food production and environmental
sustainability. In vitro selection reduces the time considerably for selection of desirable
trait under selection pressure. Somaclonal variation associated with in vitro mutagenesis
can be beneficial for screening of stress tolerant lines in a short duration using in vitro
selection. Genetically stable somaclones, confirmed in field-testing can be used in crop
improvement programmes (Patade et al., 2006).
1.2 Agrochemicals
5
Agrochemicals are various chemical products used in agriculture and it refers to
the broad range of pesticides, including insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides. It may
also include synthetic fertilizers, hormones and other chemical growth agents, and
concentrated stores of raw animal manure. Herbicides and pesticides mostly contributed
to the increase in crop productivity in terms of both yield and quality but their excessive
and improper use is creating havoc in environment. Some of these compounds persists in
plant-derived foods (Lyndon and Darlington, 1998; Jame et al., 1999) and show a
harmful effect on both animal and human health (Castro et al., 2005). Most of the
research has been focused on the efficacy of herbicides on weeds and/or the secondary
effects on crop yield, the toxicity of such substances on non-target species and the
subsequent plant responses but areas like screening of herbicide tolerant genotypes in
cultivated crops are poorly investigated including pulse crops. The lack of herbicide
tolerance for effective weed control has limited its adoption in broad acre farming
systems. In order to breed herbicide-tolerant cultivars, a source of resistance needs to be
identified. In present study attempts have been made to screen tolerant genotypes of
black gram, an important pulse crop in Indian subcontinent to broad spectrum herbicide
glyphosate.
1.3 Pulses
Pulses form the major source of protein in the predominantly vegetarian diet of
Indian people. They also occupy distinctive position in Indian agriculture as they enrich
the soil with nutrients for succeeding crops. It has been realized that pulses are perhaps
the only means of solving the protein malnutrition problem in India, as they are generally
rich in lysine and contain 20-30% protein on dry basis, which is nearly three times the
value found in cereals.
India is the world’s largest producer, consumer and importer of pulses as they are the
major protein source in the largely vegetarian Indian diet. Pulses are grown both in the kharif
and rabi seasons. With nearly 84 percent of pulse cultivation in rainfed conditions using
subsistence agricultural practices, pulse production depends largely on the monsoon and
winter rains. Limited varietal improvements, low resilience to soil moisture stress, poor pest
resistance, and low input use have contributed to poor yields. Madhya Pradesh, Uttar
Pradesh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka together account for about 70 percent
of the country’s pulse production, with Madhya Pradesh contributing more than 25 percent.
Pulse production has fallen also due to competition from less risky crops like wheat and rice.
6
Pulse production has not been attractive to farmers due to low government support of
improved production technology and a largely ineffective procurement policy.
India contributes about 40-80 % of global production of crops like chickpea,
pigeon pea, lentil, cowpea, green gram and black gram. The production of pulses in India
has been more or less stagnant fluctuating between 10-12 millions tonnes over the last 3
decades. Pulses have played a very important role in human diet in our country, as a
source of protein. Because of their high protein content, which varies from 20 to 30%,
almost three times that of the cereals, the pulses are an essential supplement of cereal
based diet; besides amino acid composition of pulse protein complements that of cereal
proteins. The pulse proteins are rich in lysine and poor in sulphur containing amino acid,
a reverse situation exists in the cereal proteins. A mixed diet of cereals and pulses has a
greater biological value as compared to of either component alone.
1.4 Constraint in Pulse Production in India
Production of major pulses is constrained by both biotic and abiotic stresses.
Most of the pulses in India are grown in low fertility, problematic soils and unpredictable
environmental conditions. More than 87% of the area under pulses is rainfed. Drought
and heat stress may reduce seed yields by 50%, especially in arid and semi-arid regions.
Another major problem is salinity and alkalinity of soils which is high both in semi-arid
tropics and in the Indo-Gangetic plains. With recent changes in the global temperatures
the grain yield is likely to be drastically affected by temperature extremities. Poor
drainage/water logging during the rainy season causes heavy losses to pigeonpea on
account of low plant stand and increased incidence of Phytophthora blight disease,
particularly in the states of UP, Bihar, West Bengal, Chhattisgarh, MP and Jharkhand
(Laxmipathi Gowda et al., 2013)
Pulse crops reported huge losses due to biotic (pests and diseases) and abiotic
(drought, high temperature, etc) stresses. Some of the studies estimated the losses in the
range from 15% to 20% of normal production (IIPR, 2011). This means, India can
increase pulses availability by 15% to 20% with investments in appropriate crop
protection research and development. As a strategy to cope with this situation, cultivars
having combined resistance to most frequent and major biotic and abiotic stress factors
need to be developed and adopted by the farmers. The scope for development of multiple
resistant varieties has increased after recent advances in genomics and needs to be
exploited further. The past success in management of biotic and abiotic stress is
encouraging. Instability in yield decreased from 13.6% to 5.5% due to the adoption of
7
biotic and abiotic stress resistant varieties and adoption of plant protection technologies
(Reddy et al., 2013).
The crop plant chosen for the present investigation, Vigna mungo [L.] Hepper, is
a member of family Fabaceae, sub-family Papilionaceae. The family includes herbs,
shrubs, trees and climbers which are cosmopolitan in distribution. It is second largest
family among dicots, and is represented by more than 550 genera and about 1300
species. Hutchinson, (1973) treated Caesalpiniaceae, Mimosaceae and Papilionaceae as
families. According to Engler and Prantl, (1897-1915) all these three are sub families of
Leguminosae. Lawrence and others, who treated them as sub-families, opine that
characters which distinguish one sub-family from the other are more apparent than the
characters which bind them together. Sub-family Papilionaceae is the largest and
includes 375 genera. Lawrence, (1951) divided it into ten tribes, on the basis of testa
topography. This sub-family is characterized by gamosepalous calyx, papilionaceous
corolla and diadelphous condition (9+1) of stamens.
1.5 Vigna mungo (Black gram)
1.5.1 Origin and Distribution
Black gram is considered to have been domesticated in India from its wild
ancestral form (V.mungo var.silvestris) (Lukoki et al., 1980). Center of genetic diversity
is found in India (Zeven and de Wet, 1982). Natural distribution of Vigna mungo var.
silvestris ranges from India to Myanmar (Tateishi, 1996). Vigna mungo occupies about
14 % of total area under pulse production in India and ranks fourth in area and
production after Cicer arietinum, Cajanus cajan, and Vigna radiata. In India Vigna
mungo occupies about 3.17 million tones. It is a highly prized pulse and cultivated under
a wide range of predominately rainfed farming system in dry and intermediate agro
ecological zones on marginal lands with low moisture and fertility conditions. It is grown
in several parts of Asia and Africa, mainly in countries like India, Bangladesh, Pakistan,
Burma and Ceylon. In India it is grown all over the country, as kharif (summer) crop in
northern India and as rabi (winter) crop in southern India with total area of about 24 lakh
hectares.
Black gram belongs to the subgenus Ceratotropis in the genus Vigna. The genus
Vigna, together with the closely related genus Phaseolus, forms a complex taxonomic
group, called Phaseolus-Vigna complex. Verdcourt, (1970) proposed a very restricted
concept of Phaseolus, limiting it exclusively to those American species with a tightly
coiled style and pollen grains lacking course reticulation, hence, promoting significantly
8
the concept of Vigna. Marechal et al., (1978) followed Verdcourt and presented a
monograph on the Phaseolus-Vigna complex. Their taxonomic system is generally
accepted now. Verdcourt, (1970) proposed that these two species should be treated as a
single species. However, Marechal et al., (1978) considered these two as distinct species
and his proposal was supported by many taxonomists. Two botanical varieties were
recognized in Vigna mungo. Vigna mungo- var. mungo is the cultivated form (black
gram); var. silvestris is the wild ancestral form of black gram (Lukoki et al., 1980). The
somatic chromosome number of Vigna is 2n=22.
1.5.2 Plant Characteristics
Vigna mungo is climbing, prostrate or erect herb or sub shrub, rarely small
shrubs. Leaves are pinnately trifoliolate; stipules bilobed or spurred at the base or not
spurred, stipels generally present. Inflorescence axillary or terminal, falsely racemose or
flowers in dense 1-many flowered subumbellate clusters; rachis usually thickened and
glandular at the point of insertion of pedicels; bracts and bracteoles deciduous. Calyx 5-
lobed, 2-lipped; upper lip of 2 lobes completely or partly united, lower lip 3-lobed.
Vexillum with inflexed auricles and 2-4 appendages or rarely appendages absent; keel
truncate, obtuse or beaked, sometimes the beak incurved through up to 360°. Stamens
diadelphous 9+1, anthers uniform, ovary 3-many ovuled; style with tenuous lower part
obsolete or quite long, filiform or flattened, upper part thickened and cartilaginous,
straight or curved, upper portion barbate or hirsute on inner side, sometimes produced
beyond the stigma to form a short to long subulate or rarely flattened or capitate beak;
stigma completely lateral, oblique or rarely terminal. Pod linear or linear oblong,
cylinderical or flattened, straight or curved. Seeds mostly reniform or quadrate; aril
obsolete to well developed, often 3-pronged. Black gram is an annual food legume. It
shows both erect and crawling growth habit. There are several distinct characters
between black gram and mungbean. Flower color of black gram is bright yellow, while
that of mungbean is pale yellow. Pocket on the keel, which is a characteristic of the
subgenus Ceratotropis, of black gram is longer than that of mungbean. Pod of black
gram is shorter than that of mungbean. Pod of black gram attaches upright to the
peduncle, while mungbean pod attaches sideward or downward to the peduncle. In most
cases, seed color is dull black. However, shiny black and shiny green seeded black gram
is also cultivated in Nepal. The area of traditional cultivation of black gram is confined
to the South Asia and adjacent regions (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and
Myanmar). Black gram is cooked as "dhal soup" (split dehusked bean soup) in South
9
Asia and adjacent regions. Black gram is used in making delicious curry, sweets, idlis,
etc.
1.5.3 Environment and Ecology
Black gram requires a warm and humid climate. Its growth and development is
proper when atmospheric humidity is 50 -70 % with a temperature of 20 -25°C. A region
with annual rainfall above 500 mm is quite suitable for its cultivation. It can be grown in
a wide range of climate. It grows successfully from sea level to an elevation of 1800
metres or more. Black gram comes up in areas receiving annual rainfall of 600-1000
mm. It is a short-day plant and most cultivars flower in 12-13 hrs photoperiod. Flowering
gets delayed with extended photoperiod. As elevation increases, flowering is delayed due
to low ambient temperature. It is grown on a variety of soils ranging from sandy to heavy
black cotton soils. It prefers water retentive heavy soils. Well drained heavy soils with a
pH ranging from 5.0 to 7.5 appear to be ideal. It can't withstand saline and alkaline
conditions. Black gram can be cultivated through out the year both as rainfed and
irrigated crop. It is predominantly a rainfed crop during rainy and post rainy seasons.
1.5.4 Natural Benefits and Curative Properties of Black Gram
Black gram is demulcent or soothing and cooling agents. It is an aphrodisiac and
nervine tonic. However, excessive use of black gram causes flatulence which can,
however, be prevented by adding little asafoetida, pepper and ginger in the culinary
preparations. It should not be taken by those who are easily predisposed to rheumatic
diseases and urinary calculi as it contains oxalic acid in high concentration.
Diabetes - Germinated black gram, taken with half a cupful of fresh bitter gourd
juice and a teaspoonful of honey is highly beneficial in the treatment of milder
type of diabetes. It should be used once daily for three to four months with
restriction of carbohydrates. Even in severe cases, regular use of this
combination, with other precautions, is useful as a health giving food for the
prevention of various complications that may arise due to malnutrition in diabetic
patients.
Sexual Dysfunction - Black gram dhal soaked in water for about six hours and
then fried in pure cow's ghee. After draining the water is an excellent sex tonic. It
can be used with wheat bread and honey with highly beneficial results in
functional impotency, premature ejaculation and thinness of the semen.
10
Nervous Disorders- The above preparation eaten with half boiled egg is an
excellent tonic in nervous disorders such as nervous weakness, weakness of
memory, schizophrenia and hysteria.
Hair Disorders - Washing the hair with a paste of cooked black gram dhal and
fenugreek lengthens the hair, keeps them black and cures dandruff.
Digestive System Disorders- Black gram is valuable in digestive system
disorders. In the form of decoction, it is useful in dyspepsia, gastric catarrh,
dysentery and diarrhea.
Rheumatic Afflictions - A liniment made from black gram is useful as an
external application in rheumatism, contracted knee and stiff shoulder. It is
prepared by boiling about 4 kg of black gram pulse in 38.4 litres of water. It
should be boiled down to about 9.6 litres and strained. The strained decoction
should be boiled with about 2.5 litres of sesame oil and 1/2 kg of rock salt till the
water has been evaporated. Paste of the fresh root is also useful in rheumatic
pains.
1.6 Effect of Pesticides on Non-Target Plants
Plant species that are by mistake exposed to pesticides are treated as non-target
plants. Effect on a non-target plant may be direct or indirect causing significant change
in the survival, health or reproduction. Pesticides cause damage to crops and vegetation
growing near agricultural lands. In agricultural area, herbicide drift-related problems
have been reported for many years. Non-target plant may be variously affected including
vegetative growth changes, plant death, altered reproductive capability that can generally
result in reduced fitness, and detrimental economic or ecological impacts.
Increased impacts to non-target vegetation may result from increased herbicide
usage for weed control in crops, roadsides, railroads, and industrial sites, and because of
drift and run-off from non-point sources. Sensitivity to pesticides may differ among
species. The major basis for the tolerance of crops to most herbicides is differential rates and
routes of herbicide metabolism. Due to the selection pressure caused by pesticides many
plant species led to the natural evolutionary development of tolerant plant genotypes in
response to a wide range of air- and soil-borne agrochemical pollutants. Many plant species
are known to either possess or lack the genetic variability for tolerance of agrochemicals.
Differential susceptibility to the nonselective herbicides can allow the establishment of
resistant species and the elimination of susceptible ones along with their competitive effects,
altering the species composition drastically (Dickinson et al., 1991). Tolerant species and
11
tolerant biotypes of herbaceous plants are favored by natural selection in pesticide-
contaminated environments, due to their ability to survive or else to competitively exclude
non-tolerant plants. In many herbaceous plants, the selection pressure of pollution has led to
the natural evolutionary changes (Karthikeyan et al., 2003).
Tolerant plant genotypes develop in response to wide range of herbicides. Sensitive
species exhibit marked changes in the vegetative growth and reproductive performance when
exposed to pesticides. The seedling stage is the most sensitive period for most species,
although surviving plants exposed to pesticides at later stages may show considerable effects
on reproduction. Many annual or colonizing plants show rapid selection for tolerance.
However, the scenario for trees and other long-lived perennials is different. They may
respond to agrochemical pollution in the same way they would respond to other temporary or
fluctuating stresses such as drought.
1.7 Weeds
Weeds are the plants, which grow where they are not wanted. They grow in the
fields where they compete with crops for water, soil nutrients, light and space and thus
reduce crop yields (ICAR, 1997). Weeds are divided into terrestrial and aquatic types on
the basis of their habitats. Nature has bestowed upon weeds a good many characters that
make them a better competitor in the crop-weed competition for water, soil, nutrients,
space, etc.; weed seeds germinate earlier; their seedlings grows faster; they flower
earlier; form many seeds; mature ahead of the crop they infest; and weed seeds can
germinate under varied conditions. Besides, seeds of a weed are easily dispersed along
with the produce of crop. Weed seeds have very long dormancy period, which is an
intrinsic physiological ability of the seed to resist germination even under favorable
conditions, and also the seeds do not lose their viability for years even under adverse
conditions. Weeds are, therefore, a major reason of huge crop losses.
1.8 Weed Control Methods
1.8.1 Manual and Mechanical Control Techniques
Manual and mechanical techniques such as pulling, cutting, and otherwise
damaging plants, may be used to control some invasive plants, particularly if the
population is relatively small. These techniques can be extremely specific, minimizing
damage to desirable plants and animals, but they are generally labor and time intensive.
They are often used in combination with other techniques, for example, when shrubs are
pulled and cut, and re-sprouts and seedlings are treated with herbicides or fire several
weeks or months later (Tu et al., 2001).
12
1.8.2 Cultural or Cropping Methods
Many farming practices are capable of changing the condition in such a way as to
enable the crop plants to compete with weeds successfully or to reduce their interference
to the minimum and thus preventing them from acting as impediments to increased crop
production. Seeds with good germination give the crop a vigorous and close stand and
enable it to outgrow weeds. The crop varieties which are well adapted to a region
compete better with the weeds than varieties poorly adapted to it. Plant breeders try to
evolve quick-growing and short-duration varieties of crop plants with a large leaf area
and good branching, and agronomists work out the proper seed-rate, depth, time and
method of sowing, applying the most effective methods of irrigation and fertilizers and
adopt a proper system of rotation. Some crops can compete better with weeds than
others. For instance crops like Sudan grass, sorghum and cowpea are good competitors
while crops, such as linseed, groundnut and lentil are poor competitors. The raising of
highly competitive crops (also known as smother crops) is useful in reducing weed
infestations. One disadvantage from which many smother crops suffer is that their
seedlings grow slowly. The cultural cropping methods are probably the most sensible
control methods available.
1.8.3 Chemical Methods
The use of herbicides or weedicides to selectively remove weeds is the efficient
chemical control method. Chemical weed control is suitable in situations and under
conditions where manual or mechanical weeding is difficult. A great advantage of this
method lies in killing weeds in the crop row or in the immediate vicinity of crop plants.
The chemical method is easier, less time-consuming and less costly than weeding by
hired labourers.
1.8.4 Biological Methods
It involves the use of living agents as a method of control, and is exercised
through the use of natural pests or pathogens. The living agents could be insects,
bacteria, fungi, or animals such as sheep, goats, cattle or horses. Biological weed control
plays an important role in managing parasitic weeds (Sauerborn et al., 2007).
1.9 Herbicide
The chemical control of weeds is accomplished by the use of herbicides.
Herbicides belong to a group of chemicals known as pesticides. Herbicides are chemicals
that specifically kill or inhibit plant growth by altering the normal plant metabolism.
13
1.9.1 Classification of Herbicides
Herbicides can be classified on the basis of their selectivity, time of application
or mode/mechanism of action (Table-1.1) (Streibig, 2003).
Table-1.1: Classification of herbicides with reference to their use
and action on plants
Criterion Examples
Degree of selectivity Selective
Non-selective
Time of application Pre-sowing
Pre-emergence
Post-emergence
Method of
application
Foliage
Soil
Translocation in
plants
Systemic
Contact
Mechanism of
action
Photosynthesis
Auxin action
Amino acid metabolism
Microtubules
Lipid metabolism
Herbicides can be categorized into selective or non-selective types on the basis
of selectivity. Selective herbicides are those that kill various weed species without
causing significant damage to crop species (Marrs, 1996), while non-selective herbicides
remove a wide range of vegetation. On the basis of time of application herbicides can be
pre-emergent or post-emergent types: Post-emergent herbicides are applied to the
foliage of the plant, where as pre-emergent herbicides are sprayed on the soil before
sowing and before the weed germinates. Pre-emergent herbicides either disrupt
germination or kill the germinating seedling. The herbicides applied to the foliage can be
contact herbicides or translocated herbicides. Contact herbicides (e.g. dicryl,
potassium cyanate, Solan, Propanil) kill only the plant or portions of the plant that comes
into contact with the chemical. Translocated herbicides or systemic herbicides (e.g.
Caebyne, 2, 4-DB, MCPB, 2, 4-5-T) move within the plant, and therefore, effective in
14
destroying the roots of perennial weeds. Herbicides are unique in that they are designed
to kill plants. Sufficiently high doses will kill both crop and weed, while small doses
have no effect upon crop and weed. The action of a herbicide is usually determined by its
chemical and physical properties, its effect on plant metabolism, the plant and the
environment.
1.9.2 Mode of Action of Herbicides
Herbicides target key enzymes in the plant metabolic pathway, which disrupt
plant food production and eventually kill it. The time and method of application of
herbicide is many a time determined by its mode of action (Tu et al., 2001). On the basis
of which they are categorized into following types:
Auxin Mimics: They mimic plant growth hormone auxin, and cause uncontrolled and
disorgansied growth in susceptible plant species. The susceptible plants exhibit
symptoms called ‘auxin overdose’. The application of this class of herbicides leads to a
rapid loss of H+ ions (protons) from the cell wall, which makes the wall more elastic,
and results in measurable cell growth. Grasses and other monocots are generally not
susceptible to auxin-mimic herbicides. This difference may be due to differences in
vascular tissue structure or differences in ability to translocate or metabolize the
herbicide (Di Tomaso, 1999). Some of the commonly used auxin mimics are 2,4-D,
clopyralid, picloram, and triclopyr.
Mitosis Inhibitors: They inhibit mitosis through direct interaction with tubulin (Duke,
1990). They are also known as dormancy enforcers. They prevent new growth in
summers. Fosamine is the most commonly used mitotic inhibitor.
Photosynthesis Inhibitors: There are two types of photosynthesis inhibitors. One class
of inhibitors blocks the transfer of electrons in photosystem II. They block electron
transport from QA to QB in the chloroplast thylakoid membrane by binding to the D-1
protein. These compounds cause chloroplast swelling, membrane leakage, ultimately
leading to cellular destruction. Hexazinone belongs to this class of inhibitors. It is
absorbed from soil solution by plant roots and transported to the site of action in the
chloroplasts of the plant. The second type of photosynthesis inhibitors accepts electrons
from photosystem I and after several cycles generate toxic hydroxyl radicals. The
hydroxyl radicals destroy unsaturated lipids and chlorophyll. This leads to the
destruction of cell membrane integrity, cell leakage, leaf wilting and desiccation, and
eventually to plant death (WSSA, 1994). Paraquat and diquat are the prime examples of
this class of herbicides.
15
Amino Acid Synthesis Inhibitors: Three enzymes of amino acid biosynthesis constitute
important sites of herbicide action: 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate synthase
(EPSP synthase), acetolactate synthase (ALS), and glutamine synthetase (GS). They are
firmly established as the primary sites of action of several important herbicide classes
(Duke, 1990). Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine] inhibits EPSP synthase, an
enzyme in the shikimic acid pathway for aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. Blockage of
this enzyme leads to massive accumulation of shikimate, and scarcity of the three
aromatic amino acids required for protein synthesis. This leads to the killing of plants.
Three different herbicide groups, the sulfonylureas, imidazolinones (Kishore and Shah,
1988), and the 1,2,4-triazol [1, 5A] pyrimidines (Kishore and Shah, 1988), inhibit the
ALS enzyme. ALS is a key enzyme in the branched chain amino acid pathway that
produces leucine, isoleucine, and valine. All of these compounds inhibit ALS by slow,
tight-binding kinetics (Duke, 1990). GS is the first enzyme involved in assimilating
inorganic nitrogen to produce an amino acid. It converts L-glutamic acid to L-glutamine
in the presence of ammonia and ATP. Bialophos is a potent GS inhibitor.
Lipid Biosynthesis Inhibitors: Aryloxyphenoxy alkanoic acids and cyclohexanediones
inhibit acetyl-CoA carboxylase, the enzyme responsible for catalyzing early step in fatty
acid synthesis. The inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase, and the subsequent lack of
lipid production leads to losses in cell membrane integrity, especially in meristems.
Fluazifop-p-butyl and sethoxydim are the two comonly used herbicides, which block
acetyl-CoA carboxylase.
1.9.3 Effect of Herbicide Overdose on Plants
Biochemically, herbicide overdose could lead to redox imbalance in the cell by
the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative stress, DNA
damage, lipid peroxidation in plasma membranes, etc, ultimately leading to cell death
(Rutherford and Krieger-Liszkay, 2001; Beligni and Lamattina, 1999; De Prado et al.,
1999; Matters and Scandalios, 1986). Nemat Alla and Hassan, (2006) reported enhanced
accumulation of H2O2, lipid peroxides and carbonyl groups in the shoots of 10-day-old
maize line Giza2 indicating an induced oxidative stress in maize following atrazine
treatments. The treatment with chlorotoluron induced the accumulation of O2- and H2O2
in leaves and resulted in the peroxidation of plasma membrane lipids in the wheat plants
(Song et al., 2007).
Plants have evolved several mechanisms through which they can tolerate lethal
doses of herbicides. Plants have different mechanisms of herbicide uptake and herbicide
16
detoxification. Different enzyme systems have evolved in plants to protect them from
herbicide-induced oxidative stress, or to conjugate herbicides and subsequent
sequestration in the vacuoles. Besides these enzyme systems, some small carbohydrate
molecules like sucrose and glucose (Sulmon et al., 2004; Sulmon et al., 2007) also confer
herbicide tolerance in plants. Sulmon et al., (2004 and 2007), reported that sucrose and,
to a lesser extent, glucose conferred a high level of tolerance to atrazine in Arabidopsis
thaliana seedlings, with maintenance of chlorophylls, carotenoids, and D1 protein, and
protection of photosystem II. Sulmon et al., (2007) showed that sugar-induced atrazine
tolerance in A. thaliana seedlings also involved the activation of ethylene signalling
pathways. The study also showed that sugar and atrazine activated the sugar signaling
pathways, resulting in derepression of hexokinase-mediated glucose repression and
induction of protection mechanisms against atrazine injury.
1.9.4 Herbicides and Oxidative Stress
Oxidative stress is induced by a wide range of environmental factors including
UV stress, pathogen attack (hypersensitive reaction), herbicide exposure, and oxygen
shortage. Oxygen deprivation stress in plant cells is distinguished by three
physiologically different states: transient hypoxia, anoxia and reoxygenation (Blokhina
et al., 2002). Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is characteristic for hypoxia
and especially for reoxygenation. Of the ROS, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide
(O2-) are both produced in a number of cellular reactions, including the iron-catalysed
Fenton reaction, and by various enzymes such as lipoxygenases, peroxidases, NADPH
oxidase and xanthine oxidase. The main cellular components susceptible to damage by
free radicals are lipids (peroxidation of unsaturated fatty acids in membranes), proteins
(denaturation), carbohydrates and nucleic acids (Blokhina et al., 2002). The formation of
ROS is prevented by an antioxidant system: low molecular mass antioxidants (ascorbic
acid, glutathione, tocopherols) (Janiszowska and Korczak, 1980) and enzymes
regenerating the reduced forms of antioxidants. In plant tissues many phenolic
compounds (in addition to tocopherols) are potential antioxidants: flavonoids, tannins
and lignin precursors may work as ROS-scavenging compounds. Plants also have
evolved ROS-interacting enzymes viz. superoxide dismutases (SOD), peroxidases (POX)
and catalases (CAT). All these help plants tolerate herbicide-induced oxidative stress.
These enzymes are involved in normal plant growth and metabolism, and also protect
plants from endogenously produced oxidative stress during the plant metabolism. Other
enzymes involved in oxidative stress metabolism are glutathione peroxidase (GPOX),
17
ascorbate peroxidase (APOX), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), glutathione transferase (GST)
etc.
Catalase (H2O2: H2O2 oxidoreductase; EC 1.11.1.6)
Catalase is a tetrameric iron porphyrin that catalyzes the dismutation of H2O2 to water
and oxygen. CAT, together with SOD and hydroperoxidases, make up a defense system
for the scavenging of superoxide radicals and hydroperoxides (ROS) (Beyer and
Fridovich, 1987).
Peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.7)
Peroxidases are a large family of enzymes that typically catalyze kind of
ROOR' + electron donor (2 e-) + 2H
+ ROH + R'OH
reactions. Most of the peroxidases utilize H2O2 as a substrate; however, some are more
active with organic hydroperoxides such as lipid peroxides. Peroxidases are now known
to be closely associated with general oxidative stress metabolism in plants, and so also in
xenobiotics metabolism.
Superoxide Dismutase (EC 1.15.1.1)
Superoxide dismutases (SOD; EC 1.15.1.1) react with superoxide radicals to produce
hydrogen peroxide. The three known types of SOD are classified by their metal cofactor:
the copper/zinc (Cu/Zn SOD), manganese (Mn SOD), and iron (Fe SOD) forms (Bowler
et al., 1992). SOD has often been correlated with herbicide, particularly paraquat,
tolerance. The effects of paraquat on SOD enzyme activity in plants have been studied in
several cases. The treatment of Phaseolus vulgaris (Chia et al., 1982) and Lemna
(Srivastave and Tel-Or, 1991) leaves with paraquat caused a general increase in SOD
activity.
1.10 Lipid Peroxidation /MDA Content
Membrane damage is sometimes taken as a single parameter to determine the
level of lipid destruction under various stresses. During lipid peroxidation, products are
formed from polyunsaturated precursors that include small hydrocarbon fragments such
as ketones, MDA, etc and compounds related to them (Garg and Manchanda, 2009).
Some of these compounds react with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) to form coloured
products called thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) (Heath and Packer,
1968). LPO, in both cellular and organelle membranes, takes place when above-
threshold ROS levels are reached, thereby not only directly affecting normal cellular
functioning, but also aggravating the oxidative stress through production of lipid-derived
radicals (Montillet et al., 2005). However, O2-and H2O2 are capable of initiating the
18
reactions but as OH- is sufficiently reactive, the initiation of LPO in a membrane is
initiated by the abstraction of a hydrogen atom, in an unsaturated fatty acyl chain of a
polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) residue, mainly by OH-· In an aerobic environment,
oxygen will add to the fatty acid at the carbon-centered lipid radical to give rise to a
ROO-.. The resulting lipid hydroperoxide can easily decompose into several reactive
species including: lipid alkoxyl radicals, aldehydes (malonyldialdehyde), alkanes, lipid
epoxides, and alcohols (Davies, 2001; Fam and Morrow, 2003). The overall effects of
LPO are to decrease membrane fluidity; make it easier for phospholipids to exchange
between the two halves of the bilayer; increase the leakiness of the membrane to
substances that do not normally cross it other than through specific channels and damage
membrane proteins, inactivating receptors, enzymes, and ion channels (Gill and Tuteja,
2010).
1.11 Proline Content
Proline is considered as a osmolyte, potent antioxidant and potential inhibitor of
programmed cell death. It is a nonenzymatic antioxidant that organisms use to mitigate
the adverse effects of ROS (Chen and Dickman, 2005). Free proline acts as an
osmoprotectant, a protein stabilizer, a metal chelator, an inhibitor of LPO, and OH- and
1O2 scavenger (Ashraf and Foolad, 2007; Trovato et al., 2008). Thus proline is not only
an important molecule in redox signaling, but also an effective quencher of ROS formed
under abiotic stress conditions in all plants (Gill and Tuteja, 2010).
1.12 Herbicide Tolerance
Herbicide tolerance can be defined as the inherent ability of plant to survive and
reproduce with a herbicide treatment at a normal use rate (Vargas and Wright, 2004). In
other words tolerance is the ability to compensate the damaging affects of the herbicide
with no physiological mechanisms involved (Menalled and Dyer, 2006). According to
WSSA, (1998) herbicide tolerance is defined as “the inherent ability of a species to
survive and reproduce after herbicide treatment”, without being selected or genetically
engineered.
Researchers postulated that weed management could be simplified by spraying a
single broad-spectrum herbicide over the field anytime during the growing season.
Herbicide-tolerant (HT) crops offer farmers a vital tool in fighting weeds and are
compatible with no-till methods, which help preserve topsoil. They give farmers the
flexibility to apply herbicides only when needed, to control total input of herbicides and
to use herbicides with preferred environmental characteristics.
19
1.13 Glyphosate
Common Name: Glyphosate
Chemical Name: N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine
Common Product Names: Accord®, Rodeo®, Roundup®, Roundup Pro®
Trade names for products containing glyphosate include Gallup, Landmaster,
Pondmaster, Ranger, Roundup, Rodeo, and Touchdown. It may be used in formulations
with other herbicides
Formulations: Commercial glyphosate products generally contain one or more inert
ingredients. An inert ingredient is anything added to the product other than the active
plant-killing ingredient. The names of inert ingredients are not usually listed on the label.
The contents of roundup formulation, used in the present investigation, are listed below:
Roundup®-glyphosate (41.0%); related organic acids of glyphosate (1.5%);
isopropylamine (0.5%); polyethoxylated tallow amine surfactant (15.4%) and water
(41.6%) (Monsanto, 2005).
Glyphosate is a post-emergent, systemic and non-selective (or broad-spectrum)
herbicide used in both agricultural and non-agricultural areas. Recommended application
rates do not exceed 5.8 kg active ingredient per hectare (a.i./ha) (WHO, 1994). It is used
to kill all plant types including grasses, perennials, and woody plants. It is mainly
absorbed into the plant through the leaves and then transported throughout the plant
where it acts on the plant’s enzyme system. It acts as a potent inhibitor of shikimic acid
pathway for biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids. It is a competitive inhibitor of 5-
enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase with respect to
phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and noncompetitive with respect to shikimate-3-phosphate
(S3P) (Coruzzi and Last, 2002). The inhibition of EPSP synthase leads to killing of
plants due to scarcity of the three aromatic amino acids viz. phenylalanine, tyrosine and
tryptophan. This pathway exists in higher plants and micro-organisms but not in animals.
Glyphosate is a weak organic acid. Its chemical name is N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine.
It is usually formulated as the isopropylamine or trimethylsulfonium salt of glyphosate.
Other ingredients known as inerts or additives are also added to the formulation. A
surfactant (wetting agent) known as polyoxyethylene amine (or POEA), which helps the
active ingredient penetrate the plant surface, is usually added to glyphosate formulations.
Other additives include sulphuric and phosphoric acids. The main breakdown product or
metabolite of glyphosate is aminomethyl phosphonic acid (AMPA).
20
1.13.1 Target Plants
Glyphosate is used to control grasses, herbaceous plants, including deep rooted
perennial weeds, brush, some broadleaf trees and shrubs, and some conifers. Glyphosate
does not control all broadleaf woody plants. Timing is critical for effectiveness on some
broadleaf woody plants and conifers.
1.13.2 Breakdown in Soil and Groundwater
Glyphosate is moderately persistent in soil, with an estimated average half-life of
47 days (Wauchope et al., 1992; WSSA, 1994). Reported field half-lives range from 1 to
174 days. It is strongly adsorbed to most soils, even those with lower organic and clay
content Thus, even though it is highly soluble in water, field and laboratory studies show
it does not leach appreciably, and has low potential for runoff (except as adsorbed to
colloidal matter) (Wauchope et al., 1992). One estimate indicated that less than 2% of the
applied chemical is lost to runoff. Microbes are primarily responsible for the breakdown
of the product, and volatilization or photodegradation losses will be negligible (WSSA,
1994).
1.13.3 Breakdown in Water
In water, glyphosate is strongly adsorbed to suspended organic and mineral
matter and is broken down primarily by microorganisms. Its half-life in pond water
ranges from 12 days to 10 weeks (USEPA, 1992).
1.13.4 Breakdown in Vegetation
Glyphosate may be translocated throughout the plant, including to the roots. It is
extensively metabolized by some plants, while remaining intact in others (Kidd et al.,
1991).
1.13.5 Mode of Action
Glyphosate is a broad-spectrum, systemic, post-emergence herbicide that is
phloem mobile and is readily translocated throughout the plant (Franz et al., 1997). From
the leaf surface, glyphosate molecules are absorbed into the plant cells were they are
translocated to meristematic tissues (Laerke, 1995). Glyphosate’s primary action is the
inhibition of the enzyme 5 enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS), a
chloroplast-localized enzyme in the shikimic acid pathway of plants (Della-Cioppa et al.,
1986). This prevents the production of chorismate which is required for the biosynthesis
of essential aromatic amino acids. These acids are used by plants in protein synthesis and
to produce many secondary plant products such as growth promoters, growth inhibitors,
phenolics, and lignin (Franz et al., 1997). In forestry, glyphosate is frequently applied to
21
release small coniferous plants from the harmful effects of competition with undesirable
vegetation such as grasses, broadleaf weeds, and woody shrubs. Unlike many contact
herbicides, phytotoxic symptoms of glyphosate injury often develop slowly. Visible
effects on most annual weeds occur within two to four days and may not occur for 7 days
or more on most perennial weeds. Extremely cool or cloudy weather following treatment
may slow activity of glyphosate and delay development of visual symptoms. Visible
effects are a gradual wilting and yellowing of the plant which advances to complete
browning of above-ground growth and deterioration of underground plant parts.
The effect of glyphosate on plants, its toxicity and tolerance, has been
studied mainly in relation to EPSP synthase (Sandermann, 2006; Lorraine-Colwill et al.,
2002; Forlani et al., 1992; Dyer et al., 1988, Yuan et al., 2002; Shyr et al., 1992; Pline-
Srnic, 2006). Glyphosate-resistant transgenic plants harboring EPSP synthase have also
been made (Arnaud et al., 1998; Zhou et al., 2006).
1.14 Objectives of the Present Study
The research conducted on in vitro screening for tolerant genotypes in Vigna
mungo has following objectives:
1. Screen black gram genotypes for herbicide tolerance using in vitro methods.
2. To study the effect of glyphosate on the morphological parameters of six genotypes
of Vigna mungo like germination and survival percentage, seedling length, fresh
weight to monitor the response of genotypes of Vigna mungo to herbicide stress.
3. Identify parameters that could be used as criterian/index for selection of herbicide
tolerance.
4. To establish efficient protocol for callogenesis and regeneration of Vigna mungo
testing different media and hormones.
5. To screen tolerant genotypes by various in vitro methods.
6. To find out if glyphosate also induces the activity of antioxidant enzymes, like
catalase, peroxidase and SOD, and effect of same on total protein, proline content,
chlorophyll content MDA content/(lipid peroxidation) in genotypes of Vigna mungo.
7. Selection of most suitable/appropriate method for the screening of tolerant
genotypes.
22
2.0 Review of Literature
There is paucity of reports on the screening of herbicide tolerant genotypes in
Vigna mungo and other pulses while there is ample work done on screening of tolerant
genotypes for various stresses in other crops (Table- 2.2). But there is no report to the
best of my knowledge for selection /screening of herbicide tolerant genotype in pulse
crops.
2.1 Vigna mungo: An Introduction
Black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper), popularly known as urd bean, urid or
mash is an important self-pollinating diploid grain legume and belongs to the family
Leguminosae and subfamily Papilionaceae. An important food legume crop of the Indian
subcontinent comprising of India, Burma, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka (Kumar et al.,
2009) and it is rich in protein content (Green and Layman, 1972). Black gram is
considered to have been domesticated in India from its wild ancestral form V.mungo var.
silvestris. Center of genetic diversity is found in India (Zeven and de Wet, 1982). The
chromosome number of this crop is 2n=2x=22.
2.1.1 Origin and Distribution
Black gram is supposed to have originated in India as evidenced from vedic
literature and from India it spread to other countries. In Sikkim two forms of urd are
present, (i) Large seeded, early maturing black seeded types (kalodal) which belongs to
Vigna mungo var. mungo (ii) small seeded late-maturing types with colours varying from
brown, olive green grey (panhelo dal) to mottled which belongs to Vigna mungo var.
viridis. Black gram is considered to have been domesticated in India from its wild
ancestral form V.mungo var.silvestris, (Lukoki et al., 1980). Center of genetic diversity is
found in India (Zeven and de Wet, 1982) whose distribution ranges from India to
Myanmar (Tateishi, 1996).
Black gram is distributed mainly in tropical to sub-tropical countries where it is
grown mainly in summer season. It is grown in India, Pakistan, Sri-Lanka, Burma, and
some countries of South East Asia. In India black gram is very popularly grown in
Andhra Pradesh, Bihar Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal,
Punjab, Haryana, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka with an area of about 3.29 million ha and a
total production of 1.60 million tones, with an average productivity of 485 kg/ha. Andhra
Pradesh leads with the highest productivity followed by Orissa. ‘Kalodal’ or ‘Panhelo
23
dal’ as it is known in Sikkim, is extensively cultivated in all the dry belts of South and
West districts of Sikkim. In Sikkim total area under urd cultivation is 3.55 thousand
hectare production is 2.78 thousand Tonnes and productivity is 783.10 kg/ha.
2.1.2 Uses
Its seeds are highly nutritious with protein (25-26%), carbohydrates (60%), fat
(1.5%), minerals, amino acids and vitamins. Seeds are used in the preparation of many
popular dishes. It is one of the most important components in the preparation of famous
south Indian dishes, e.g. dosa, idli, vada etc., it adds about 42 kg Nitrogen per hectare in
soil. Protein content in black gram and its fractions range from 12 to 42%, while fat
content range from 0.9 to 3.4%. Germ had the highest content of fat and protein, while
seed coat and plumule fractions had the lowest (0.9%). Seed coat had the highest dietary
fiber content (78.5%) while cotyledon had the lowest (24.4%). Seed coat, plumule and
aleurone layer enriched in seed coat extracts show antioxidant potential and good α-
glucosidase inhibitory activity (Girisha et al., 2012).
Table 2.1: Composition of black gram
Minerals and
Vitamins
Food Value*
(%)
Minerals and
Vitamins
Food Value*
(%)
Moisture 10.9 Calcium 154 mg
Protein 24.0 Phosphorus 385 mg
Carbohydrate 59.6 Iron 9.1 mg
Fat 1.4 Vitamin B-
complex Little
Minerals 3.2 Calorific value: 374
Fibre 0.9
Total 100
*Value per 100 g edible portion
2.1.3 Taxonomy
Black gram belongs to the subgenus Ceratotropis in the genus Vigna. The genus
Vigna, together with the closely related genus Phaseolus, forms a complex taxonomic
group, called Phaseolus-Vigna complex (Verdcourt, 1970). Verdcourt proposed a very
restricted concept of Phaseolus, limiting it exclusively to those American species with a
tightly coiled style and pollen grains lacking course reticulation, hence, promoting
significantly the concept of Vigna. According to his proposal, black gram and its
24
relatives (which is now recognized as the subgenus Ceratotropis) were transferred to the
genus Vigna from the genus Phaseolus. Marechal et al., (1978) followed Verdcourt and
presented a monograph on the Phaseolus-Vigna complex. Their taxonomic system is
generally accepted now. Taxonomic treatment of black gram and mungbean (V.radiata)
has been confused. Verdcourt, (1970) proposed that these two species should be treated
as a single species. However, Marechal et al., (1978) considered these two as distinct
species and his proposal was supported by many taxonomists. Two botanical varieties
were recognized in V.mungo. V.mungo var. mungo is the cultivated form (black gram),
var.silvestris is the wild ancestral form of black gram (Lukoki et al., 1980).
2.1.4 Plant Characteristics
Black gram is an annual food legume. It shows both erect and crawling growth
habit. There are several distinct characters between black gram and mungbean. Flower
color of black gram is bright yellow, while that of mungbean is pale yellow. Pocket on
the keel, which is a characteristic of the subgenus Ceratotropis, of black gram is longer
than that of mungbean. Pod of black gram is shorter than that of mungbean. Pod of black
gram attaches upright to the peduncle, while mungbean pod attaches sideward or
downward to the peduncle. In most cases, seed color is dull black. However, shiny black
and shiny green seeded black gram is also cultivated in Nepal.
2.1.5 Botany
Like green gram, black gram is an annual, semi-erect to spreading herb growing
to a height of 25-90 cm. Stems are diffuse, branching sometimes procumbent, and
covered with long dense brown or black hairs. It possesses strong tap root system with
many laterals. Leaves are pinnately trifoliate, hairy with large ovate to lanceolate and
entire leaflets. Flowers are pale yellow, small with a yellow spirally coiled keel. The
flowers are borne in clusters of 5-6 on a short hairy peduncle in axillary racemes. Pods
are short, erect to sub erect, 4-7 cm long and 0.6 cm wide, brown to black in colour,
hairy and with stout hooked beak, containing about 6-10 seeds. Seeds are small, oblong
slightly truncated at ends measuring 4-5.2 mm long and 3.5-4.1 mm wide; thousand
seeds weight is around 40 g with varying colour from black, dark brown to green. The
testa is smooth and hilum white and concave. Pods do not shatter readily. Flowers are
self-fertile and self pollinated. Flowering is indeterminate.
2.1.6 Environment Requirement
As tropical crop black gram tolerates high temperature, it is cultivated both in
kharif and summer seasons. It needs warm weather and due to the same reason the crop
25
is grown during rainy season and summer season in North India. However in central
parts it is grown during rainy as well as winter season. It is a short-day plant, but day
neutral cultivars are available for cultivation in the long-days of summer. The optimum
temperature for better growth ranges between 25 to 35ºC but it can tolerate up to 42 ºC.
It is a hardy and drought resistant plant, and can be grown in areas receiving moderate to
low rainfall. It is sensitive to cloudy weather and cannot tolerate frost. It requires heavier
and water retentive soil in places where rainfall in scanty, but in humid regions it is
mainly grown in uplands. It is grown mostly as rainfed crop and relayed with maize in
the drier areas in Sikkim. It is also grown on paddy field bunds. The crop is grown in the
lower and mid-hill up to an elevation of 1400 meters. Though it is grown on a variety of
soils ranging from sandy to black cotton soils but the most ideal one is the well drained
loam soil. It can also be grown on saline and alkali soils as it tolerates slight alkalinity.
2.1.7 Cultivation
2.1.7.1 Planting Time
Black gram is basically a hot season crop exhibiting tolerance to higher
temperature and susceptibility to cold and frost. In northern parts of the county, where
the temperatures during winter are quite low, it is cultivated only during the rainy season.
i.e. from middle of June to middle of July. However, in the eastern states it is also grown
during winter. In the central and southern states where there is not much variation in
climate, it is cultivated both during summer and rainy season. Despite the slight variation
in optimum date of sowing during different seasons depending on agro-climatic zone,
variety and soil conditions, sowing between mid-June to mid-July is found to be
optimum time for kharif season. Early planting in first week of July results in higher
yield and any delay in sowing beyond this date causes reduction in yield. The optimum
time for sowing the summer crop is during March. In Sikkim the optimum time of
sowing is during the months of July to August.
2.1.7.2 Weed Management
The first 4-5 weeks after sowing is critical for crop weed competition i.e. 30 days
after sowing. The extent of damage due to weeds can be as high as 50-60%. Good
seedbed preparation, one or two manual weeding within days after sowing may
effectively control the weeds. For years farmers have been fighting against their farm
pests: rodents, insects, micro-pathogen and weeds that tolled heavy crop yield losses
dwelling a segment of world population from malnutrition to starvation. As research
based knowledge accumulated, concepts of modern farm technologies shaped up and
26
new choices replaced the older cost inefficient farm practices. Attempts were made to
kill the pests by spraying pesticides and herbicides.
Glyphosate became a prominent herbicide in agriculture about 18 years ago when
it was discovered that glyphosate resistance genes could be inserted into crops using
biotechnology (Clark, 2012). Now, glyphosate resistant corn, cotton, soybeans, canola
and sugar beets are common. Glyphosate being broad spectrum can kill most or all
unwanted weeds while crops remain unharmed.
2.2 Vigna mungo: Weeds and Herbicides
Adoption of proper and timely weed management practices plays a pivotal role in
increasing crop yields as weed causes severe loss due to competition with crop for
essential growth factors like nutrient, moisture, space, light etc. Weeds act as host and
thereby they intensify the problems of disease, insect and other pest. Weed management
influences production, eco-environment and sustainability in pulse production. Pest
management in general and weed management in particular, has tremendous scope for
increasing food production. Modern agriculture largely depends on herbicides for
chemical weed control, Saxena et al., (1976) reported that initial four to six weeks were
the most critical for weed competition.
In India weeds offer serious competition to blackgram, yield losses may be upto
75-100%. This problem is more critical under rain fall when weeds grow luxuriantly and
it also hinders the physical weeding operations. This is the reason why chemical control
of weeds is of great importance in our country (Gupta and Choudhary, 1986). Like any
other crop urd bean is also affected by various diseases, pests and weeds. The most
common weeds in urd bean fields are broadleaf weeds and grass weeds. Buckweed
(Fagopyrum Munch.), wild oat (Avena fatua L.), paradoxa grass (Phalaris paradoxa L.),
smartweed and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Weber) predominantly affect urd bean
fields. Nandan et al., (2012) reported that predominant weed flora in urdbean fields
comprised of Echinochloa colona (80%), Cynodon dactylon (15%) and Cyperus
rotundus (5%) in monocots whereas among dicot weeds, Commalina bengalensis (75%)
and Ageratum conozoides (15%) were predominant. They also tested efficiency of pre
and post emergent herbicides on weed flora of urd bean under rainfed subtropical
Shiwalik foothills of Jammu and Kashmir. The weed free treatment produced the highest
seed yield and was at par with imazethapyr 250 ml/ha (post-emergence) after 15–20 days
sowing. However, among the other treatments, pendimethalin (pre-emergence) 1.0 kg/ha
27
at 30 DAS was found superior in controlling the weed flora and increasing the seed
yield. Unweeded check produced the lowest seed yield.
Das et al., (1990) reported that imazethapyr at 0.150 kg was found to be superior
to the other herbicide treatments in reducing weed populations and weed DW. This
treatment also gave the highest grain yield in black gram (Vigna mungo) cv. T-9.
Shekhawat et al., (2002) reported maximum plant height, yield attributes and grain yields
of maize and black gram when metolachlor at the rate of 1.0 kg/ha was applied. Rathi et
al., (2004) investigated that low dose of pendimethalin (0.5 kg/ha) followed by one hand
weeding done at 60 days after sowing demonstrated intended weed control (67.80%
WCE), enhanced higher grain yield (379 kg/ha or 119.49%) in Central Uttar Pradesh.
Mayfield and Presser, (1988) found that crop topping with paraquat or glyphosate is an
effective strategy for controlling ryegrass seed set in some pulse crops without yield loss
of the crop.
Singh, (2011) reported that pendimethalin 0.45 kg/ha+hand weeding (HW) 25
days after sowing (DAS) gave maximum yield in summer season in blackgram. Soni
and Singh, (1988) found that among the weed control methods two hand weeding and
fluchloralin 1 kg/ha per-plant incorporation in soil recorded higher yield in Vigna mungo.
Ishaya et al., (2008) found that mixture of metolachlor and prometryn at
1.25+0.08 kg a.i./ha was consistent in better growth and seed yield. However, application
of mixtures of metolachlor and terbutryn at 0.99+0.50 kg a.i./ha and ametryn and
terbutryn at 1.60+1.00 kg a.i./ha gave lower vigour score of the crop, higher crop injury,
smaller canopy spread and lower seed yield. It can be concluded that the metolachlor and
prometryn mixture gave good selective weed control in cow pea.
Singh and Singh, (1988) evaluated the effects of pre-emergence herbicides (1.0 or
1.5 kg/ha alachlor or 0.75 kg pendimethalin) or manual weeding (at 20 ± 35 d after
sowing) for the control of weeds like Echinochloa spp., Ageratum conyzoides, Celosia
argentea, Euphorbia hirta, Panicum spp., Achyranthes aspera and Xanthium strumarium
in Vigna mungo cv. T-9 on sandy loam. The herbicides reduced weed DW from an
untreated value of 1890 to 890-1210 kg/ha., whereas manual weeding once and twice
resulted in 280 and 110 kg DW of weeds, respectively. All treatments increased V.
mungo seed yields from 235 to 445-695 kg/ha; the highest value resulted from manual
weeding twice, but pendimethalin also gave high yields (680 kg).
Shaukat et al., (1980) evaluated tolerance of Vigna radiata and Vigna mungo to
chlorophenoxy acetic acid, chlorophenoxy butyric acid and triazine herbicides. They
28
suggested that prometryne is the safest herbicide for weed control in V. mungo and V.
radiata.
The efficiency, suitability, selectivity, toxicity and overdose effects of many
herbicides on various Vigna spp. have been studied. Soltani et al., (2005) studied the
effects of some post-emergent herbicides (bentazon, fomesafen, sethoxydim, quizalofop-
p-ethyl, imazamox plus fomesafen and imazamox+bentazon) on the growth and yield of
adzuki bean (Vigna angularis). They recommended that fomesafen, sethoxydim,
quizalofop-p-ethyl and imazamox +fomesafen are better suited for weed management in
adzuki beans.
O'Makinwa and Akinyemiju, (1990) also demonstrated that a pre-emergence
application of 3 kg a.i./ha of a metobromuron+metolachlor mixture was most suitable to
control Euphorbia heterophylla L. weed in two cowpea cultivars (Ife-Brown and TVx
3236). However, its post-emergence application was lethal to cowpea. Alachlor at 2.5
and 5.0 kg a.i./ha applied pre- and post-emergence was also ineffective for the control of
E. heterophylla. The herbicide dimethazone severely affected the growth and chloroplast
development in cowpea (Duke and Paul, 1986). The affected plastids lacked thylakoids,
had irregular envelopes, and contained numerous vesicles. Duke and Kenyon, (1986)
demonstrated that dimethazone affected chloroplast development, but it did not have a
direct effect on photosynthesis. Almas et al., (2005) studied the effects of glyphosate,
metribuzin, fluchloralin and 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-acetic acid (2,4-D) on plant vigor,
nodulation, photosynthetic pigments, N content, seed yield and protein content in seeds.
The pre-emergence application of the four herbicides, at 2 μg a.i./g of soil, adversely
affected these parameters. The maximum increase of 12.5% in seed yield occurred at 0.5
μg a.i./g of glyphosate. However, metribuzin at 0.5 and 1 μg a.i./g decreased the seed
yield by 33.3 and 55.5%, respectively. Glyphosate at 0.5 μg a.i./g increased the number
of nodules formed per plant by 12.5% and 14.3% at 35 and 60 days after sowing.
Metribuzin (0.5 and 1 μg a.i./g) and the higher rates of 2 μg a.i./g of glyphosate,
fluchloralin and 2,4-D significantly reduced the nodulation (nodule number and dry
mass). The maximum grain protein (24%) was obtained for glyphosate at 0.5 μg a.i./g
while minimum grain protein was obtained at 0.5 (10%) and 1 μg a.i./g (8%) of
metribuzin application. The study showed that among the herbicides tested, metribuzin
showed significant phytotoxicity to the crop. However, the other three herbicides could
be used with caution and at appropriate doses.
29
Mansoor et al., (2004) evaluated the efficacy of various weed management
strategies in mung bean. Hand weeding, water extracts of sorghum, Eucalyptus and
Acacia, and a pre-emergence herbicide pendimethalin were compared to assess the utility
of each of these three methods for weed control in mung bean. All the treatments
significantly affected number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, 1000 grain
weight and grain yield. It was found that the water extract of Acacia was most suited,
followed by hand weeding and pendimetahlin treatment. Dungarwal et al., (2003)
conducted a study to determine the most effective herbicidal treatment for controlling
weeds in mung bean variety K-851. The herbicides and doses tested were: pre-
emergence application of alachlor (1.5 or 2.0 kg/ha), pendimethalin (0.75 or 1.00 kg/ha),
metolachlor (0.75 or 1.00 kg/ha), pre-plant incorporation of trifuralin (0.75 or 1.00
kg/ha) and fluchloralin (0.75 or 1.00 kg/ha), and controls. The higher rates of alachlor,
pendimethalin, trifluralin, fluchloralin and metolachlor were more effective in reducing
weed density and weed dry matter and produced higher mung bean yields than their
lower rates. Among the herbicide treatments, 2 kg alachlor/ha recorded the lowest weed
density and weed dry matter, followed by trifluralin and pendimethalin (both at 1.0
kg/ha). It was most effective in reducing crop-weed competition, producing a mean yield
of 791 kg/ha. Felton, (1979) demonstrated that bentazone herbicide treatment
significantly reduced the mung bean yield. Bentazone influenced yield most by reducing
the number of pods per plant; there was also a significant reduction in the number of
seeds per pod. The grain size was reduced as well with increased and repeated rates of
bentazone treatment.
Kaushik and Inderjit, (2006) evaluated the phytotoxicity of three herbicides with
different modes of action: atrazine, a photosystem II inhibitor; metsulfuron, an
acetolactate synthase inhibitor; and isoxaflutole, a 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvatedioxygenase
inhibitor. The parameters studied were shoot height, chlorophyll concentration and
cellular damage. It was seen that isoxaflutole inhibited shoot growth and chlorophyll
concentration of the mung beans. However, atrazine and metsulfuron did not cause
reduction in the shoot growth. Metsulfuron (226, 452, 1356 and 2260 μg/kg soil) and
isoxaflutole (452, 1356 and 2260 μg/kg soil) in soil reduced the concentration of leaf
chlorophyll.
Watanabe et al., (2001) examined oxyfluorfen-induced lipid hydroperoxide
contentm and changes of fatty acids constituting the neutral lipid in mung bean
cotyledons. Oxyfluorfen induces lipid peroxidation, which, in turn, leads to oxidative
30
stress. The continuous oxidative stress caused by oxyfluorfen exposure led to the
destruction of cell membranes. The results of the study demonstrate that oxyfluorfen-
induced oxidative stress disrupts the regulation of the biosynthesis of different fatty acid
species in mung bean. Parani, (1999) studied the effects of herbicide Machete on growth
and metabolism of seedlings of V. radiata and V. mungo. Windley et al., (1999)
conducted a screening of some broadleaf herbicides for post-emergent use in mung bean.
Nehru et al., (1999) evaluated the effect of some herbicides on seed germination and
seedling vigour. Ameri et al., (2012) surveyed effects of different doses of pursuit
herbicides on weed control and yield and yield components of two cultivars of cowpea in
city of Ahvaz, Iran. They recommended that for pre-emergence, after complete weeding
treatment, Pursuit 1 liter treatments per hectare is best treatment. Singh et al., (2012)
assessed the comparative efficacy of salicylic acid in combination with different
concentrations of pendimethalin on black gram (Vigna mungo). Seed germination and
seedling growth decreased under increasing pendimetahlin concentrations. Root length
also reduced significantly. Herbicide treatment remarkably declined pigment, protein and
sugar contents of the seedlings when compared with control. Total antioxidants and
malondialdehyde (MDA) content increased significantly in pendimethalin treated
seedlings. Rao et al., (2010) found that pre emergence sand mix application of
pendimethalin 1000 g ha-1
followed by imazethapyr 50 g/ha at 20 days after sowing
(DAS ) significantly reduced weed growth and recorded the highest seed yield (1113 kg
/ha) in black gram.
2.3 Glyphosate
The herbicide properties of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine] were
discovered by Monsanto in 1970. Glyphosate was first introduced as a commercial
herbicide in 1974 with the trade name Roundup™, and is now it is the most important
and the most widely used herbicide in the world (Franz et al., 1997; Baylis, 2000; Powles
and Preston, 2006). Glyphosate is a post-emergent, systemic, nonselective, broad-
spectrum herbicide that controls annual and perennial weeds and crops in a wide range of
conditions. It was initially used as a non-crop and plantation crop herbicide but now
widely used for selective weed control in transgenic glyphosate-tolerant crops, such as
soybean (Glycine max L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), canola (Brassica napus L.),
and corn (Zea mays L.) (Baylis, 2000; Shaner, 2000, Woodburn, 2000) and also in non
transgenic crops.
31
Glyphosate is a simple zwitter ionic amino acid which is formulated as many
different salts like roundup which is formulated as isopropylamine salt of glyphosate. It
is applied as a foliar spray because it tightly binds to soil components and has little or no
activity in soil. Glyphosate is easily degraded by several soil microbes (Duke et al.,
2003). Glyphosate salts are highly polar, water-soluble molecules with low lipophilic
character that probably penetrate the overall lipophilic cuticle via diffusion through a
hydrophilic pathway (hydrated cutin and pectin strands) into the apoplast (Caseley and
Coupland 1985; Franz et al., 1997). Absorption of glyphosate by plant cells through the
plasma membrane into the symplast is a slow process and involves a passive diffusion
mechanism, and also an active transport mechanism (phosphate carrier) (Caseley and
Coupland, 1985; Franz et al., 1997). Glyphosate is rapidly translocated in most plants. It
readily enters the symplast, and its translocation takes place through phloem like source
and sink relationship of solute transport (Perez-Jones, 2007).
2.4 Herbicide Resistance and Tolerance
Herbicide resistance is an induced inherent ability of some plant species to
survive and reproduce after receiving a lethal dose of herbicide (Prather et al., 2000). In
contrast herbicide tolerance can be defined as the inherent ability of plant to survive and
reproduce with a herbicide treatment at a normal use rate (Vargas and Wright 2004). In
other words tolerance is the ability to compensate the damaging affects of the herbicide
with no physiological mechanisms involved (Menalled and Dyer, 2006). The level of
tolerance to commonly used herbicides in cereal and pulse varieties has been found to
vary between cultivars. The variation in tolerance may be due to any combination of
differences in morphological or physiological traits among the varieties (Zerner et al.,
2014).
The mechanisms that are involved in herbicide resistance can be categorized into
two: (A) target site-based resistance, and (B) nontarget site-based resistance. In target
site-based resistance there is a modification of the site of action in such a way that the
herbicide has reduced affinity and no longer binds to the altered target enzyme. This
results from a single nucleotide change (i.e., mutation) in the gene encoding the enzyme
to which the herbicide binds (Devine and Shukla, 2000; Preston and Mallory-Smith,
2001). Target site-based resistance is applied in case of those herbicides that inhibit
photosynthetic electron transfer at photosystem II (Gronwald, 1994), acetyl CoA
carboxylase (ACCase) (Délye et al., 2005), acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Tranel and
Wright, 2002), and tubulin polymerization (Yamamoto et al., 1998). However in
32
nontarget site-based resistance there is elimination of the herbicide molecule from the
target site due to differential uptake and/or translocation, sequestration, or increased
metabolic detoxification. Many weed species like blackgrass (De Prado and Franco,
2004), rigid ryegrass (Preston, 2004), and downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) (Park et
al., 2004), have evolved resistance to several herbicides due to increased rates of
herbicide detoxification.
Many enzymes are involved in the metabolic detoxification of herbicides, like
glutathione transferases, the aryl acylamidases, and the cytochrome P-450
monooxygenases. Decreased translocation and decreased penetration of the herbicide to
the active site, as well as increased sequestration of the herbicide in the vacuole, have
been suggested as the mechanisms of resistance of barley grass (Hordeum glaucum
Steud.) to paraquat (Devine and Preston, 2000; Preston and Mallory-Smith, 2001).
2.5 Mechanism of Glyphosate Action and Tolerance
Glyphosate inhibits the enzyme 5- enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP)
synthase (EC 2.5.1.19) (Steinrucken and Amrhein, 1980, Amrhein et al., 1980). EPSP
synthase is the sixth enzyme of the shikimic acid pathway, which is essential for the
biosynthesis of the aromatic amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan, and
also for the production of numerous aromatic secondary metabolites (e.g., auxins,
phytoalexins, anthocyanins, and lignin) (Kishore and Shah, 1988); tetrahydrofolate,
ubiquinone, and vitamin K (Gruys and Sikorski, 1999). EPSP synthase catalyzes the
conversion of shikimate-3- phosphate and phosphoenol-pyruvate (PEP) to yield EPSP
and inorganic phosphate (Geiger and Fuchs, 2002). Reduction in aromatic amino acid
pools is accompanied with the increase in shikimic acid. This increase in shikimic acid
has been related to a decline in carbon fixation intermediates (e.g., ribulose
bisphosphate) and a reduction of photosynthesis (Duke et al., 2003). The shikimic acid
pathway, present in plants and microorganisms, is completely absent in mammals, fish,
birds, reptiles and insects. The inhibition of EPSP synthase leads to killing of plants due
to scarcity of the three aromatic amino acids. EPSPS inhibition results in bleaching,
chlorosis, and stunted growth of plants. These symptoms are mainly concentrated in
metabolically active sink tissues such as immature leaves, shoot tips, buds, and roots
(Franz et al., 1997). The yellowing from exposure to glyphosate starts with the older
leaves and moves toward the younger leaves.
33
Figure-2.1: Shikimate Pathway
Rubin et al., (1982) found that activities of enzymes of aromatic amino acid
biosynthesis i.e. shikimate dehydrogenase, chorismate mutase, and aromatic
aminotransferase, prephenate dehydrogenase and arogenate dehydrogenase were all
insensitive to inhibition by glyphosate but 95% inhibition of 3-deoxy-Darabino-
heptulosonate 7-phosphate (DAHP synthase-Co) was found in the presence of
glyphosate. Shikimate accumulation and in vivo inhibition of both 5-enolpyruvylshikimic
acid 3-phosphate synthase and one of the two DAHP synthase isozymes was found in
glyphosate-treated seedlings. Amrhein et al., (1983) reported that Aerobacter aerogenes
and cultured cells of the higher plant Corydalis sempervirens growing in 10 mM
glyphosate showed a 10–30-fold increase in amounts of shikimic acid-3-phosphate
and/or shikimic acid. Pinto et al., (1988) studied that glyphosate induces 3-Deoxy-D-
arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cells
grown in suspension culture. Forlani et al., (1992) proposed that a glyphosate-resistant
5-enol-pyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate synthase confers tolerance to a maize cell line to
34
glyphosate at concentrations as high as 10 mM. Tolerance to the herbicide was correlated
with the reduced affinity of the enzyme for the substrate phospho-enol-pyruvic acid.
Milligan et al., (2001) elucidated that the expression of a maize glutathione S-
transferase gene in transgenic wheat confers herbicide tolerance, both in plant and in
vitro. Yuan et al., (2002) suggested triple mechanisms of glyphosate-resistance in a
naturally occurring glyphosate-resistant plant Dicliptera chinensis. They found that
glyphosate treatment caused a significant increase in the EPSPS mRNA and protein level
but the increase is not due to gene amplification. They also suggested possible
posttranscriptional regulation. Ye et al., (2001) reported that plastid-expressed 5-
enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase genes provide high level glyphosate
tolerance in tobacco. Plastid-expressed EPSPS could provide very high levels of
glyphosate resistance, although levels of resistance in vegetative and reproductive tissues
differed depending on EPSPS accumulation levels, and correlated to the plastid
abundance in these tissues.
2.6 In vitro Screening for Stress Tolerance
While making selections under the field conditions, plant breeders do not have
precise tools, to select the desirable traits. It takes several years and many generations to
accomplish the goal. In vitro selection can shorten considerably the time for the selection
of desirable traits under in vitro selection pressure with minimal environmental
interaction, and can complement field selection. Table-2.2 lists in vitro selection for
tolerance to herbicide, disease resistance, and abiotic stress in different crop plants.
There are several types of stresses that can be applied in plant tissue culture to obtain
different types of objectives like selection of tolerant genotypes for various stresses
(Table -2.2), assess the effect of various stresses on cell metabolism and cultures and
select tolerant callus/cell lines for different stresses (Table-2.1).
In the present work we investigated the in vitro methods of screening for
herbicide tolerance in Vigna mungo genotypes. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge,
this is the first report in which the screening of glyphosate tolerant genotypes has been
done. The in vitro effects of glyphosate on seed germination, plant morphology, callus
induction plant regeneration ability antioxidative responses were also investigated. Six
varieties of V. mungo were chosen for the study PU-19, PU-31, PU-35, IPU-94-1, Azad-
1 and Azad-2. The seeds were procured from the Indian Institute of Pulses Research
(IIPR), Kanpur. The isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, RoundUp (Monsanto, USA), was
used in all the experiments. The molecular weight of glyphosate mono-
35
isopropylammonium is 228.2 and it is supplied as a 41% solution. For initial/preliminary
screening seeds were soaked for 24 hrs in increasing glyphosate concentrations, the seeds
were allowed to germinate in petridishes. After germination the data on various
morphological parameters were taken and analyzed. Further selection scheme involved
in vitro germination of seeds either in herbicide medium/ selective media or in basal MS
media. The conclusions drawn from these experiments have been detailed and discussed
in the next chapter.
2.7 In vitro Selection for Herbicide Tolerance
Herbicides are now extensively used to improve crop yields. However, the
damage caused by soil residues in crop rotation programs and selective concentrations
used for weed control, have narrowed the usefulness of many herbicides to a limited
range of crops, and for many crops suitable herbicides are still not available. The high
cost of producing, testing and marketing new herbicides has made the development of
plants with tolerance to specific herbicides a feasible solution to these crop/herbicide
interaction problems. Plant tissue culture has revolutionized the entire scenario of crop
improvement. Regeneration of plants from callus and in vitro selection is the most
important strategy that has been used to obtain efficient regenerated lines and
subsequently genetic manipulation of crops using in vitro techniques. Many attempts to
produce herbicide tolerant plants using in vitro selection have been made to date with
varying degrees of success.
Tolerance revealed at the cell level is unstable and may vanish when the selection
agent is not present. If the tolerance continued in the absence of the selection agent it
must still be expressed in the regenerated plant. If herbicide tolerance has a genetic basis
the tolerance must be transmitted to the selfed progeny of the regenerated plants.
Regenerated plant may be resistant (survive to normally lethal levels of the herbicide) or
tolerant (the plant can survive at sub lethal levels as compared to the wild type (Gressel
et al., 1978). Sometimes unstable herbicide tolerance develops due to some epigenetic
events which develop in response to selection pressure and may be lost when the
selection pressure is removed. The main cause of epigenetic changes may be changed
levels of gene expression due to in vitro culture conditions rather than from a true
mutation of gene regulatory mechanisms (Chaleff, 1983). According to Hughes, (1983)
instability may be due to a very low or total absence of expression of the variant trait
even though it may be present in the genome. This is because gene(s) for herbicide
resistance may be differentially activated, i.e. the mutation is expressed in cultured cells
36
but not in the regenerated whole plant (Meredith and Carlson, 1982). Tolerance may also
be lost if plants are regenerated from chimeric callus composed of both resistant and
sensitive cells. The sensitive cells may grow more as compared to the resistant cell on
non-selective media, and since these sensitive cells may also have increased organogenic
capacity, a sensitive plant may be produced (Pofelis, 1991).
Various methods have been applied for selection of herbicide tolerance in plants.
In in vitro selection method herbicide is added the culture medium at required
concentration. Most of the publications talks about the selection of somaclonal variant
cell lines showing resistance to herbicide except that of Yenne et al., (1987) where
responses of existing commercial cultivars were compared. In another report Brassica
microspores were subjected to mutagenic agents, plated, and then early stage embryos
subjected to range of herbicides. Survivors completed the regeneration and colchicine
doubling phase and plants were regenerated for testing (Beversdorf and Kott, 1987).
Resistance to most major herbicide classes has been selected in vitro, and success has
been met with obtaining partially resistant plants regenerated in many cases. Plants
regenerated from resistant cell lines of tobacco showed tolerance to the sulfonylurea
herbicides chlorsulfuron and sulfometuron methyl (Chaleff, 1986a; 1986b). Plants
regenerated from hybrid poplar leaf explants subjected to selection on media containing
sulfometuron methyl were tolerant of herbicide levels lethal to control plants (Michler
and Haissig, 1988; Michler, 1988). Regeneration of shoots from poplar leaf explants
exposed to glyphosate gave rise to glyphosate tolerant plants (Michler and Haissig,
1988). Yenne et al., (1987) observed that in pea, in vitro sensitivity of some commercial
varieties showed some correlation with field sensitivity to glyphosate. Picloram tolerant
tobacco plants were regenerated from resistant cell lines (Chaleff, 1986b). Instability of
the tolerance is a feature of several of these findings like plants of birdsfoot trefoil
regenerated from cells surviving in chlorsulfuron media was found to be more sensitive
than the controls (MacLean and Grant, 1987).
Roudsari et al., (2009) regenerated glyphosate-tolerant Nicotiana tabacum after
plastid transformation with a mutated variant of bacterial aroA gene. A variant form of
EPSPS gene that confers higher resistance to the broad-spectrum herbicide, glyphosate,
was substituted against the spectinomycin resistant gene as a sole selectable marker for
plastid transformation of Nicotiana tabacum. A long preculture incubation period
followed by a gradual increase in glyphosate concentration led to sufficient expression of
the transgene.
37
Khalafalla et al., (2005) recovered herbicide-resistant Azuki bean plants via
Agrobacterium- mediated transformation and obtained plants expressing the hygromycin
phosphotransferase (hpt), green fluorescent protein (sgfp) and phosphinothricin
acetyltransferase (bar) genes. Zhou et al., (2006) used a directed evolution strategy to
identify of a glyphosate-resistant mutant of rice 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate
synthase. In this method rice (Oryza sativa) EPSPS gene, mutagenized by error-prone
polymerase chain reaction, was introduced into an EPSPS-deficient Escherichia coli
strain, and transformants were selected. Three mutants with high glyphosate
resistance
were identified. Glyphosate resistance assays indicated a 3-fold increase in glyphosate
resistance
of E. coli expressing the P106L mutant. Ling et al., (2006) selected
glyphosate- and haloxyfop-resistant embryos through application of these substances to
the cultural media with microspore-derived embryos in vitro in four oilseed rape
(Brassica napus L.) F1 hybrids (7039, 7040, 282 and 5102). Genotypes 7039 and 7040
were used to select glyphosate-resistant regenerated plants and genotypes 282 and 5102
to select haloxyfop-resistant plants. The embryos at cotyledonary stage were grown on
glyphosate- and haloxyfop-containing MS-2 medium for 2 weeks. The non-resistant
embryos collapsed after a short time, while the resistant ones turned green and survived
for 2 weeks. The regenerated plants from green embryos showed tolerance to 0.25%
sprayed glyphosate, indicating the effectiveness and reliability of this in vitro selection
method.
In vitro culture of rice buds has been developed to induce tolerance to
phosphinothricin (PPT) by Liu et al., (2005). At earlier stage of tissue culture with PPT
concentrations higher than 0.76 μM inhibited the bud growth of rice cv. Koshihikari.
Smaller buds were more sensitive. Through 28-day incubation, microshoot induction was
most significantly stimulated by 5.0 μM PPT, as compared with other concentrations;
with higher levels resulting in plant death.
Raducanu, (2004) performed in vitro screening for roundup resistance in
sunflower. A preliminary experiment was performed in order to determine the dose of
glyphosate required in the culture medium to inhibit callus growth relative to control by
50% (ID 50). The explants represented by immature embryos (10 days old) were
cultivated on Har medium supplemented with NAA and BAP. After the incubation
period calli were transferred on the same medium with Roundup (glyphosate) with
concentrations: 2.0 ml/l; 3.0 ml/l; 4.0 ml/l; 6.0 ml/l. Genotypes differed regarding their
response (callus viability), depending on the herbicide concentration. Callus viability
38
decreased with increasing herbicide concentration. Venkataiah et al., (2005) selected
atrazine-resistant plants by in vitro mutagenesis in cotyledon cultures of pepper
(Capsicum annuum). Low levels of herbicide cause less growth inhibition, with some
chlorophyll loss causing albino shoots. Mutagenized cotyledon explants resulted in
production of herbicide-resistant plants on medium containing selective levels of sucrose
(0.5%) and atrazine (20 mg/l). Complete atrazine-resistant plantlets were obtained after
rooting of regenerated green shoots on rooting medium containing 10 mg/l atrazine,
1.0mg/l IAA and 0.5% sucrose. All regenerants were resistant to the atrazine.
Koch et al., (2009) screened populations of sugarcane from breeding crosses for
naturally occurring tolerant genotypes, and produced tolerant genotypes through in vitro
cell mutagenesis. 11000 seedlings were sprayed with 0.1-1.5 l/ha Arsenal, after which
1.25 l/ha Arsenal was selected to test 12000 seedlings. In the second approach
regeneration of herbicide tolerant plants through induced somaclonal variation was used.
Somatic embryogenesis calli of N12 were screened for somaclonal variant tolerance to
imazapyr, which may have resulted from 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in the
culture medium.
Cha-um et al., (1999) selected Khaw Dawk Mali 105 (KDML 105) calli tolerant
to glyphosate on solidified MS selection medium (MS salts and vitamins, 1 mg/l kinetin,
and 10-4
M glyphosate). Glyphosate caused reduction in calli fresh weight. The selected
calli at 4 and 8 weeks (S4 and S8) could be regenerated on the glyphosate-free medium.
Plantlets were propagated by tissue culture technique and treated with 0, 10-5
, 5x10-5
and
10-4
M glyphosate in vitro. The height of S4 and S8 plantlets was decreased with
increasing glyphosate concentrations in culture media while number of tillers and
number of roots were increased in culture media with 10-5
M glyphosate. The S8 plantlets
could survive on the culture supplemented with 5x10-5
M glyphosate. Increasing the
height of plantlets indicated high survival percentage under glyphosate stressed
condition. Tolerant plants were transferred to pots and treated with 0, 250, 500, 1000 and
2000 mg/l glyphosate. The growth of plants was inhibited and phytotoxicity was
observed when treated with high glyphosate concentrations. Increasing glyphosate
concentrations resulted in lesser toxicity in S8 plantlets than in S4 plantlets.
Chen et al., (2012b) obtained glyphosate-tolerant variants in manilagrass (Zoysia
matrella L.) by in vitro selection and greenhouse screening. Calli were transferred to
selection medium containing 2 mM glyphosate. After two rounds of selection calli were
transferred to regeneration medium without glyphosate. Regenerated plantlets were then
39
transferred to regeneration medium containing 0.5 mM glyphosate to select tolerant
plantlets. Fully developed plantlets were transferred to a green house and then subjected
to greenhouse screening by foliar spraying with 0.05 % glyphosate solution.
Lee, (1981) studied effect of glyphosate on callus cultures or tobacco (Nicotiana
tabacum and N. glauca-langsdorffii, and soybean (Glycine max L., cv. Chippewa)
Glyphosate inhibited growth both in the dark and light but showed a greater toxicity in
the dark. The inhibition of growth was not reversed by simultaneous addition of aromatic
amino acids to the medium. The tobacco callus tissue was more sensitive to glyphosate
than the soybean callus tissue, showing differential tolerance between plant species.
Despite the inhibitory effect of glyphosate, treated tissue revived after being transferred
to a glyphosate-free medium.
In vitro culture of barley calluses has been used to produce plants with increased
glyphosate tolerance. Calluses from immature embryos were cultured on Murashige and
Skoog medium with 10-6
, 10-5
, 10-4
, 5×10-4
, 10-3
, or 10-2
M glyphosate for one, four or
thirty months. Plants were regenerated from calluses maintained in glyphosate medium
at 10-6
, 10-5
or 10-4
M for four months, at 10-5
or 5×10-4
M for one month and at 10-5
M for
thirty months (Escorial et al., 1996).
Callus cultures were initiated from hypocotyl segments of oilseed flax (Linum
usitatissimum) and transferred to selection medium containing chlorsulfuron, the active
ingredient in the herbicide Glean®. After a suitable period, surviving colonies were
isolated from the selection medium and placed in regeneration medium, where shoot
reorganization in some cases produced fertile plants (Jordan and McHughen, 1987).
Dryanova and Dimitrov, (2000) studied morphogenetic response of callus
cultures of 3 triticale genotypes after adding herbicide Stomp 330 (pendimethalin) into
the regeneration nutrient medium. The regenerative ability was not affected at the lowest
herbicide concentration (0.01%). However, the higher doses (0.05 and 0.1%) reduced
regenerative ability at different rates depending on the genotype. Rhizogenesis was
completely suppressed. The necrotic calluses increased and the fresh, unorganized
growing calluses reduced. Abnormalities such as chromatin pycnosis and micronuclei
were observed. The frequency of these abnormalities was proportional to the herbicide
concentration. Stomp 330 exerts a strong C-mitotic effect in the callus cells, which is
demonstrated by high frequency of polyploid cells.
Toldi et al., (2000) produced rice (Oryza sativa L.) tolerant to the herbicide
phosphinothricin (PPT) by means of in vitro selection. First, sublethal and lethal
40
concentrations of PPT on 7-day-old seedlings were determined. Differentiation of 6–30
microshoots on 5–40% of the treated plant material was observed on a hormone-free
culture medium supplemented with a sublethal concentration of PPT. Fertile plants were
grown from those microshoots having PPT tolerance under greenhouse conditions. An
elevated GS activity was detected in PPT-tolerant plant material which could result in an
elevated PPT tolerance at unchanged concentrations of the herbicide.
A lot of information of biochemical pathways of herbicides, along with an
understanding of the different mechanisms involved in plant resistance is now available.
Using cell culture techniques, it is possible to screen large populations of somatic cells
for resistant variant cells in a limited amount of space and in a short time. The source of
genetic variability can already be present in the original tissue, can be generated with the
use of a mutagen or be randomly culture induced. Callus, suspension, and protoplast
techniques have been used in cell selection programs, each with their own advantages
and limitations. Moreover, the application of a selection pressure (i.e. an herbicide in the
culture medium) during the selection procedure makes the screening more efficient by
giving the variant cells/callus of interest the selective advantage. Selection using cell
culture techniques can be a useful tool only when if the character that is being selected
for, operates at the cell level, and is also expressed in the whole plant. Metribuzin, for
example, a highly effective herbicide on photosynthesizing seedlings, acts on the
photosynthetic electron transport system. However, the herbicide was found to have no
effect on callus culture growth and development (Ellis, 1978).
2.8 Trangenic Approaches for Development of Herbicide Tolerant Plants
In recent time gene transfer technology has been widely used for screening,
development and characterization of herbicide tolerant plants as this technology provide
better results in less time and labour. Genetic engineering can complement traditional
breeding methods, it is possible to introduce herbicide tolerant genes into the desired
germplasm. Nasir et al., (2014) used glyphosate-tolerant gene of 1368 bp cloned
directionally under the 35S promoter with the β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene as
the transgene. Calli were transformed via the biolistic method with glyphosate-tolerant
gene constructs. Acclimatized transgenic sugarcane plants survived the glyphosate spray
application of 900 mL/0.404 ha, except for the control nontransformed plants. Van Der
Vyver et al., (2013) also obtained herbicide-resistant transgenic sugarcane plants
containing mutant forms of a tobacco acetolactate synthase (als) gene were obtained
following biolistic transformation. Putative transgenic callus was selectively proliferated
41
on MS medium containing chlorosulfuron. Glasshouse spraying of putative transgenic
plants with 100 mg/l chlorsulfuron dramatically decreased the amount of non-transgenic
plants. Herbicide-resistant cowpea were produced by transformation with the bar gene
(Aasim et al., 2013). Immature cotyledons were transformed with Agrobacterium
tumefaciens strain LBA4404 harboring the recombinant binary vector pRGG containing
an herbicide tolerance gene (bar) along with a uida (GUS) gene under 35S promoter.
Phosphinothricin was used as a selectable marker at a concentration of 2.5 mg l–1
.
Putative transformants were screened by the histochemical GUS assay. The selected
transgenic plants showed a resistance to Basta® nonselective herbicide at up to 10 ml l–1
of water. Kwapata et al., (2012) performed genetic transformation of common bean
(Phaseolus vulgaris L.) via the biolistic bombardment of the apical shoot meristem
primordium. Transgenes used were gus color marker which visually confirmed
transgenic events, the bar herbicide resistance selectable marker used for in vitro
selection of transgenic cultures and the HVA1 drought tolerance genes. Torres et al.,
(1999) produced glyphosate-resistant plants of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) by using
Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing a plasmid carrying glyphosate oxidase and
EPSPS gene. An in vitro assay was performed to determine the sensitivity of ‘South Bay’
leaf discs and seedling explants to varying glyphosate concentrations. The I50 for
glyphosate leaf discs was 53.8 mM and for glyphosate seedlings 7.6 mM. There was a
high correlation between the response of leaf discs and seedlings to glyphosate based on
dry weight. These findings will allow identification of glyphosate-resistant transformants
in an early stage of plant development, saving time and reducing the cost in generating
an improved cultivar with the glyphosate resistance trait.
2.9 In vitro Studies in Vigna Group of Pulses
In vitro culture technique helps in the implementation and manifestation of
biotechnological investigations and has been extensively used in plants. It is generally
accepted that exogenous growth regulators play major role in the formation of callus
tissue. In culture both auxin and cytokinin are required for indefinite growth and cell
division in callus. After the formation of unorganized mass of cells at the cut ends,
gradually the whole tissue gets involved to form callus. The callus gradually increases in
mass and cells are added by mitotic division. Estimation of callus growth can be made on
the basis of change in fresh or dry weight. Several workers have tried tissue culture
techniques in leguminous crops (Kartha and Gamborg, 1978; Mukhopadhyay and
Bhojwani, 1978; Bajaj and Dhanju, 1979; Boulter and Crocoma, 1979; Phillips and
42
Collins, 1979; Hammat and Davey, 1997; Hammat et al., 1986; Gulati and Jaiwal, 1992,
1990; Gill et al., 1988; Polisetty et al., 1997) and have discussed the importance of tissue
culture methods in improvement of pulses and their regeneration potential. Success has
also been achieved in regenerating the plants, shoot morphogenesis and somatic
embryogenesis.
2.9.1 Direct Shoot Organogenesis
2.9.1.1 Cotyledonary Node Explant
Formation of multiple shoot from cotyledonary node explants relies on the
number and size of cotyledons attached to the cotyledonary node, type and concentration
of cytokinin, presence or absence of shoot tip and genotype. Cotyledonary node explants
with or without cotyledon developed multiple shoots on MS (Murashige and Skoog,
1962) or MSB (MS salts and B5 vitamins) medium supplemented with different
concentrations of cytokinins (Gill et al., 1987; Ignacimuthu et al., 1997; Sen and
Mukherjee, 1998; Franklin et al., 2000; Saini et al., 2003; Mony et al., 2010).
Cotyledonary node explants cultured on medium with 1.0 mg/l BAP for 10 days
followed by transfer to hormone-free media gave higher number of shoots (9.33
shoots/explant) compared to those cultured on hormone-free medium for 15 days
followed by transfer to medium containing 1.0 mg/l BAP (8.33 shoots/explant). The
shortest shoots (1.77 cm) was observed in culture of explants for 15 days on MS medium
containing 10 mg/l BAP followed by transfer to hormone free MS medium. The highest
concentration of BAP in shoot initiation medium might have a suppressive effect on
shoot length (Mony et al., 2010). Presence of BAP is required for multiple shoot
production and shoot bud regeneration can be achieved via meristem formation on
excised cotyledons on MS basal medium with B5 vitamins supplemented with TDZ (Sen
and Mukherjee, 1998). The explant with both the cotyledons without shoot tip was found
to be more superior to those with one or no cotyledon. Absence of both the cotyledons
delayed the shoot induction response and reduced the regeneration frequency, the
number of shoots per explant and the length of shoots (Saini et al., 2003). According to
these reports presence of cotyledon on the explant is not necessary for multiple shoot
formation, which is contrary with previous findings in which there was either no
regeneration (Ignacimuthu et al., 1997) or regeneration of only a single shoot (Sen and
Mukherjee, 1998) from such explants without cotyledons. In the presence of cotyledons,
the axillary shoots produced from node were healthy and possessed trifoliate leaves
whereas in the absence of cotyledons, the shoots were weak and possessed a simple leaf
43
(Franklin et al., 2000). The younger explants gave better shoot regeneration response
than older ones (Saini et al., 2003). Efficient in vitro plant regeneration was achieved
using nodal and cotyledonary node explant of Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek by Vats et al.,
(2014). Maximum response in terms of shoot regeneration was observed in MS medium
supplemented with BAP (0.5 ppm) and NAA (0.25 ppm). The regenerated shoots were
cultured on rooting medium supplemented with different doses of IBA. The best
response was observed in 3 ppm IBA.
Direct and efficient multiple shoot regeneration (80–100%) from the
cotyledonary nodes was obtained in all epigeal and in hypogeal asiatic Vigna species
while two other hypogeal species V. angularis and V. umbellata failed to initiate shoots
from the nodes. Adventititious shoots also developed at the basipetal cut (hypocotyl) in
35–67% of V. angularis explants. Cotyledonary node explants were more regenerable
than cotyledons. Rooting response was higher in MS basal medium than in MS with 1.0
mg/l IAA (Avenido and Hattori, 1999).
Immature cotyledonary node explants excised from immature pods after 18 d of
anthesis, on MS basal medium supplemented with BAP (1.0 mg/l), TDZ (0.1 mg/l) and
AdS (15 mg/l) developed a maximum of 28 shoots/ explant at the end of second
subculture, i.e. after 45d of culture. Periodic excision of regenerated shoots from
explants increased shoot regeneration efficiency during subculture. Elongation and
rooting were performed in GA3 (0.6 mg/l) and IBA (1.0 mg/l) containing medium
(Muruganantham et al., 2005).
Efficient regeneration of mungbean from cotyledonary node explants was
achieved by Gulati and Jaiwal, (1994). The explants were capable of directly developing
multiple shoots on basal media devoid of any growth regulators. The shoot multiplication
was influenced by media composition, growth regulators, age of donor seedling and
explant type. The explants with both the cotyledons attached to the embryonic axis
excised from 4-d-old seedlings, produced the highest number of shoots (5 or 6) in 100%
of the cultures within 2 weeks on B5 basal medium (BBM) containing BAP or 2-iP,
respectively, (at 5x10−7
M) and 3% sucrose. Shoots elongated and developed better using
BAP.
Double cotyledonary node explants from 3-d-old seedlings germinated on MS
and Gamborg’s medium (B5) containing (2.0 mg/l) 6-benzyl aminopurine (BAP) showed
multiple shoot bud initials when cultured onto MS B5 medium augmented with different
concentrations of BAP and very low concentrations of different auxins (NAA, IAA and
44
IBA) and cytokinin (Kn). For shoot proliferation shoot bud initials were transferred to
MS B5 media containing reduced concentrations of BAP (Yadav et al., 2010). Axillary
and adventitious shoot regeneration was found in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek from 3 day
old cotyledonary node and hypocotyl explants on MS medium supplemented with TDZ
(0.9 μM). An initial exposure to TDZ for 20 d and three successive transfers to fresh
medium with reduced TDZ levels (0.09 μM) resulted in the regeneration of 104 shoots
per explant from the cotyledon and 30 shoots per explant from the hypocotyl (Amutha et
al., 2006).
The shoot multiplication rate was influenced by the presence or the absence of
cotyledons in cotyledonary node explants of african cowpea variety (Diallo et al., 2008).
Explants with two entire cotyledons produced the greater number of shoots (8.3)
supplemented with 1 mg/l BAP. Shoots elongation is optimal on media supplemented
with kinetin. Rooting was improved after an induction phase on half strength MS,
producing 95.83% of rooted plants.
Shoot regeneration occurred from immature cotyledonary nodes from18 day-old
immature cotyledonary node explants (18 d after anthesis) of black gram
(Muranganantham et al., 2005). Multiple shoots produced in MS salts+B5 vitamins
containing medium in the presence of BA (1.0 mg/l), TDZ (0.1 mg/l) and AdS (15 mg/l).
Maximum shoot proliferation (28 shoot/explant) occurred at the end of second subculture
after 45 d. Periodic excision of regenerated shoots from explants increased shoot
regeneration efficiency during subculture. The combination of TDZ and AdS with BA
significantly increased shoot proliferation. Elongation and rooting were performed in
GA3 (0.6 mg/l) and IBA (1.0 mg/l) containing media, respectively. Muruganantham et
al., (2007) performed efficient Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of Vigna mungo
using immature cotyledonary-node explants and phosphinothricin as the selection agent.
Herbicide (Basta®)-tolerant Vigna mungo L. Hepper plants were produced using
cotyledonary-node and shoot-tip explants from seedlings germinated in vitro from
immature seeds. Shoot regeneration occurred for 6 week on regeneration medium (MS
medium with 4.44 μM BAP, 0.91 μM TDZ, and 81.43 μM AS with 2.4 mg/l PPT,
elongation medium (MS medium with 2.89 μM GA and 0.4 mg/l PPT), β-glucuronidase-
expressing putative transformants were rooted in MS medium with 7.36 μM IBA and 2.4
mg/l PPT.
Multiple shoots were induced from cotyledonary nodes of grasspea derived from
7-d-old in vitro seedlings on MS medium containing BA, kinetin, or TDZ, BA being the
45
most effective. Genotype IC-120487 gave the maximum number of shoots (11.3 shoots
per explant) on MS medium augmented with 2.0 mg/l BA. Up to 81.8% of the shoots
developed roots following transfer to half-strength MS medium containing 0.5mg/l IAA
(Barik et al., 2005). Bud proliferation occurred at the cotyledonary nodes of cowpea
seedlings three weeks after culture on MS medium containing B5 vitamins supplemented
with TDZ. A 10 μmol/l TDZ pre-treatment, shoot tip removal and excision of
longitudinal thin cell layers (TCL) at the level of the cotyledonary nodes with subsequent
culture on a MSB5 medium supplemented with 1 μmol/l IBA and 1 μmol/l TDZ were the
optimal conditions for maximum bud proliferation. Up to 32.5 regenerated shoot buds
were produced per TCL. The regenerated plants were true-to-type and successfully
transferred to soil (Van Le et al., 2002). Vijayan et al., (2006) developed direct multiple
shoots from the cotyledonary node explants of 2-day-old in vitro grown seedlings of
mungbean. Maximum number of shoots (an average 12.1 shoots per explant) was
obtained on a medium containing MS salts, B5 vitamins and 5.0 mg/l BAP. A medium
with lower BAP concentration appeared suitable for rapid shoot elongation. The
elongated shoots were rooted on 0.2 mg/l NAA.
2.9.1.2 Shoot Apex Explant
Shoot apices cultured on modified MS basal medium supplemented with PGRs
directly elongated into shoots without callus formation and the shoots gradually
developed roots at the basal end, resulting into complete plantlets (Agnihotri et al., 2001;
Das et al., 1998; Saini and Jaiwal, 2005). Basal medium supplemented with BAP (0.5 –
15 µM) induced callusing at the base of explants followed by multiple shoots
differentiation. Maximum 3-4 shoots of 3.5 cm in length were obtained in the 90% of the
cultures when BAP concentration was 1.0 µM (Saini and Jaiwal, 2005). Preconditioning
of the explant at 10 µM BAP for 3d was most effective in increasing the number of
shoots by 3-fold (an average of 13-14 shoots/explant) over those without pre-
conditioning treatment (4-5 shoots/explant). 4 shoots was produced from shoot tip on
culture in the presence of two cytokinins, 2.2 µM each of BAP and 2-iP and 0.48 µM
NAA. BAP along with 2-iP was more effective than either of the cytokinins alone
(Agnihotri et al., 2001).
Complete plants were regenerated directly without an intervening callus phase
from shoot tips on basal medium (MS salts+B5vitamins) in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek
(Gulati and Jaiwal, 1992). Regeneration frequency varied with genotype, explant size and
growth regulator combinations in the medium. Addition of cytokinins induced a variable
46
amount of callus at the base of the shoot tip, followed by multiple shoot formation.
Benzyl adenine (BA), kinetin and zeatin at 5×10-6
M each, induced multiple shoots in
100% of the explants but the highest number of regenerants per explant (9) was produced
with BA. The efficacy of BA for shoot multiplication was not improved when it was
supplemented with naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) or indole acetic acid (IAA). NAA or
adenine sulphate, when applied alone, induced complete plantlets. The growth regulator
requirement of explants for the induction of multiple shoots varied with explant size.
Two endangered aromatic varieties of Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek Sonamung and
Tilmung were micropropagated by in vitro shoot-tip multiplication (Betal and
Raychaudhuri, 1999). The best hormone combination in B5 medium was 0.2 mg of
NAA/ l and 5 mg of BA/l. Shoot-tip multiplication method was found to be a
reproducible and effective method for germplasm preservation of mungbean.
Brar et al., (1997b) studied in vitro shoot tip multiplication of cowpea Vigna
unguiculata (L.) Walp cv.Georgia-21. 5 mM long shoot tips cultured on MS medium
containing BA at 1, 2.5, or 5 mg/l or kinetin at 1, 2.5, or 5 mg/l combined with 2,4-D at
0.01, 0.1, or 0.5 mg/l NAA at 0.01, 0.1, or 0.5 mg/l. BA induced greater shoot
proliferation as compared to kinetin. The highest number of shoots was produced on BA
5 mg/l in combination with NAA or 2,4-D at 0.01 mg/l (0.05 µM). Roots were formed in
the presence of kinetin, but not on BA-containing medium. Shoots were rooted on 0.1
mg (0.5 µM) NAA per liter to form whole plants.
Multiple shoots from shoot meristems of three - five-day-old in vitro grown
seedlings of turkish cowpea was obtained in MS supplemented with 0.50 mg/l BAP - 0,
0.10, 0.30 and 0.50 mg/l NAA. Increased diameter of calli was recorded on MS medium
containing 0.5 mg/l BAP and 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 mg/l NAA. The highest frequency (%) of
shoot regeneration and mean number of shoots per explant was recorded on MS medium
containing 0.5 mg/l BAP with out NAA (Aasim et al., 2008). Aasim et al., (2009)
compared shoot regeneration on different concentrations of TDZ from shoot tip explant
of cowpea on gelrite and agar containing medium. Frequency of shoot regeneration
increased with increase in TDZ concentrations in both cultivars on both agar and gelrite
gelled medium. Both cultivars showed maximum mean number of shoots per explant in
gelrite compared to agar gelled medium. Maximum number of 4.72 and 2.86 shoots per
explant were recorded on MS medium containing 0.25 mg/l TDZ in cv. Akkiz and cv.
Karagoz respectively. Agar gelled medium had greater shoot length compared to gelrite
medium in both cultivars. Regenerated shoots were rooted easily on MS medium
47
containing 0.50 mg/l IBA with regeneration of mean number of 4 secondary shoots on
cv. Akkiz and 3 on cv. Karagoz. Multiple shoot formation from the plumular apices
excised from mature embryos of cowpea cv. Akkiz was obtained after pulse treatment
with 10 mg/l BAP for 5 days followed by culture on MS medium containing 0.25, 0.50,
0.75 and 1.00, 1.25 mg/l BAP – with or without 0.10 mg/l NAA. 0.1 mg/l NAA showed
positive effect on callus diameter and shoot length. Maximum number of shoots 7.11 per
explant was obtained on MS medium containing 1.00 mg/l BAP. Longer shoots were
recorded on MS medium containing various concentration of BAP+ 0.1 mg/l NAA
compared to those containing various concentrations of BAP singly. All shoots cultured
on MS medium containing 1 mg/l BAP were rooted on MS medium containing 0.50 mg/l
IBA (Aasim et al., 2010). Shoot organogenesis response was observed from shoot apices
of 3–5-day-old seedlings of black eye cowpea. The optimal medium for maximum shoot
initiation comprised MS salts, B5 vitamins, 8.88 µM BAP, 1 gl/1 casein hydrolysate, 342
µM L-glutamine, 3% sucrose, 0.3% phytagel, adjusted to pH 5.8. A shift in pH from 5.8
to 7.0 had no effect on shoot initiation and on number of shoots per explant (Mao et al.,
2006).
Agnihotri et al., (2001) found that among the five explants of V. mungo var. T9
the excised shoot tips gave best response with regard to offshoot formation followed by
the embryonal axis explants. Combination of 0.5 mg/l BAP, 0.5 mg/l 2iP and 0.1 mg/l
NAA produced 10 offshoots in shoot tip explants, only 3 offshoots were formed in the
explants of embryonal axis in a treatment containing 0.5 mg/l BAP and 0.1 mg/l NAA,
found optimum for them. Multiple shoots differentiated when growing offshoots were
first cultured in a treatment containing 0.1 mg/l BAP, 0.25 mg/l IAA and 5 mg/l CCC
(chloroethyltrimethyl ammonium chloride) and then subcultured in the same treatment
but having only 1 mg/l CCC. The isolated shoots rooted in 0.5 mg/l IAA, resulting in the
formation of complete plantlets.
2.9.1.3 Epicotyl and Hypocotyl Explant
Sen and Mukherjee, (1998) induced multiple shoots and plant regeneration under
in vitro condition using cotyledonary nodes, excised cotyledons, and hypocotyl segments
of six varieties of Vigna mungo and V. radiata. Multiple shoots developed on
cotyledonary node explants in all varieties tested on basal medium containing cytokinin.
Presence of both the cotyledons, either full or half, resulted in a maximum number of
shoots produced. Shoot bud regeneration was achieved via meristem formation on
excised cotyledons on Murashige-Skoog basal medium with B5 vitamins supplemented
48
with TDZ. Mature plants had normal phenotypes. V. mungo var. PS1 and V. radiata var.
Pusa 105 were found to be the most responsive varieties for shoot regeneration.
Mongomaké et al., (2009) produced in vitro regeneration system via direct
organogenesis in Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L.) using hypocotyl and
epicotyl cuttings. Basal MS medium supplemented with BAP, Kn (kinetin) or TDZ with
or without NAA were attempted. Multiple shoots were induced from both explants but
regeneration efficiency was higher in epicotyl cuttings. BAP (2 mg/l) gave the highest
response (73.33 - 97.77%) with the regeneration of 3.7 shoots per explant with hypocotyl
and 5.8 shoots per explant with epicotyl. The regenerated shoots were elongated on the
same medium as used for induction and rooted on half-strength MS basal medium
without any growth regulators. 62% of the plantlets were successfully acclimatized and
potted plants were established in soil with 73% survival rate.
The epicotyl explants excised from 3-day-old in vitro - raised seedlings planted
vertically with basal cut end inserted in the MS basal medium (MSB) with BAP (5 µM)
produced multiple shoots at the apical end by direct organogenesis while the basal end
formed callus which differentiated into shoots via indirect organogenesis. With increase
in the age of explants, the shoot forming response increased at the apical end while at the
basal end only callus formation takes place. Substitution of BAP at an equimolar
concentration with kinetin, 2-iP, TDZ and AdS or auxins (IAA, IBA, and NAA) did not
improve shoot regeneration. The shoot forming response of explants decreased as the
distance of the epicotyl segment increased from shoot apex of the mother seedling as
well as when the orientation of explants deviates from the normal vertical upright
position (Saini and Jaiwal, 2002).
2.9.2 Shoot Organogenesis via Callus
Callus induction and shoot regeneration was observed from cotyledonary node,
hypocotyl and other explants (epicotyl, axillary bud, immature leaf) on MS basal
medium supplemented with B5 vitamins, IAA, NAA, IBA, KIN and BAP either
individually or in combination (Geetha et al., 1997). Among these explants, hypocotyls
were found to be more efficient in producing callus on MSB medium containing NAA
(16.1 µM) and BAP (2.2 µM). Shoots were induced from callus cultures on medium
containing different combinations of kinetin (2.3 - 9.3 µM) or BAP (2.2 - 8.8 µM)
together with IAA (2.8 µM) or NAA (2.6 µM). The highest frequency of shoot bud
regeneration (80.8%) and the highest number of shoots (13.9 shoots/callus) were
49
observed using cotyledonary node explant with BAP (6.6 µM) and NAA (2.2 µM)
(Geetha et al., 1997).
Shoot regeneration via callus formation also occurred on BAP (1 mg/l) alone
from cotyledonary node explants (Avenido and Hattori, 1999). Multiple shoot induction
from embryo derived callus cultures of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Walp has also
been reported (Odutayo et al., 2005). After five weeks, multiple shoots developed from
the calli cultures after being subcultured on media with high concentration of cytokinin,
BAP. Percentage shoot production from calli grown on media with 1 mM concentration
of BAP was 45.5% while calli subcultured on 4 mM BAP produced 87.5% shoot
production. Root development was promoted by the action of the auxin, NAA, at low
cytokinin concentration.
Cotyledonary tissues of black gram var. Sarala were used first to develop
organogenic calli within 4–6 weeks of culture on MS medium supplemented with 3.0
mg/l BAP and 2.0 mg/l NAA. Shoot buds were formed on MS medium supplemented
with 2.0 mg/l BAP within 3–4 weeks of subculture (Adlinge et al., 2013). The number of
shoots per culture varied from 1.12 to 8.75 in different growth media. The cultures
incubated initially on dark photoperiod for 2 weeks and subsequently transferred to 16 h
photoperiod showed higher number of shoot bud regeneration. The proliferated shoots
were further sub-cultured on similar medium for higher rate of shoot bud regeneration.
The effect of cytokinins BAP, TDZ and Kn on in vitro regeneration from
cotyledonary explants was studied in black gram var. Vamban-1 (Srilatha, 2014). The
regenerated shoots elongated on the same medium. TDZ (4.0 mg/l) was proved to be best
for induction of shoots from cotyledon explants. Micro shoots were rooted on MS
medium fortified with IBA (3.0mg/l) followed by transfer to green house. TDZ induces
significant regeneration as well as shoot elongation from cotyledon in black gram var.
Vamban-1.
Callus initiation, shoot regeneration and plantlet formation from cotyledon,
hypocotyl, root tip and shoot tip explants were studied in black gram by Mony et al.,
(2008). Among the explants, hypocotyls showed the best performance in callus
formation (92.33%) with 2.5 mg/l BAP and 1.5 mg/l NAA followed by cotyledon, shoot
tip and root tip explants, respectively. Shoot regeneration from the calli was also
maximum in hypocotyls (56.33%) in medium with 3.0 mg/l BAP and 0.3 mg/l and 0.5
mg/l GA3 (gibberellin) while other explants had no shoot regeneration.
50
Roy et al., (2003) reported plantlet regeneration in black gram from callus culture
and effect of genotype, explant and media composition. Hypocotyl, shoot bud, leaf tip
and root tip explants of black gram genotypes B-76, T-9, L-13 and L-7 were cultured on
B5 and modified MS media. Hypocotyls and roots of 4- to 7-day old seedlings exhibited
earlier and faster callusing. Addition of 2,4-D to the medium was more effective than
addition of NAA. Callus induction was faster and more successful in modified MS
medium with MS salts and B5 vitamins than in B5 medium. Plantlet regeneration was
achieved in modified MS medium. Maintaining an auxin:cytokinin ratio of 1:3 in the
culture medium was critical for the success of in vitro propagation of black gram.
Primary leaf explants excised from 7-d-old in vitro raised seedlings produced
calli on MS medium supplemented with 2, 4-D (6.0 µM). 2-week-old leaf derived
greenish white friable calli differentiated in to shoot buds on MS liquid medium
supplemented with 6.0 µM 2,4-D. The shoot buds were then transferred to MS medium
containing 6.0 µM 2,4-D for development of plantlets (Srivastava and Pandey, 2011).
NAA failed to induce calli and shoots buds, indicating that leaf segments have different
sensitivity to various auxins and their concentrations. Full-strength MS medium was
found to be more effective than the other media due to the presence of high levels of
nitrogen, particularly the reduced form (NH4PO4) in MS medium.
Regeneration of V. radiata and V. mungo was achieved from callus cultures
derived from leaf explants on basal media supplemented with various combinations of
growth regulators. Maximum callus was formed with 4 µM each of 2, 4-D and kinetin.
Shoot bud formation in V. radiata occurred within 10 days after transferring the callus
into the MS medium supplemented with 15 µM kinetin + 1 µM NAA, while roots were
induced within a week in root induction medium (BM supplemented with NAA). Shoot
regeneration from callus decreased with increasing concentration of auxins in the
medium, while maximum rooting was observed with 6 µM NAA in the medium. In vitro
regeneration of V. radiata and V. mungo plantlets from shoot tip (apical meristem)
cultures was observed within 4 weeks on MS medium supplemented with cytokinins.
Kinetin (15-17 µM) was found optimum for plant regeneration (Teli and Maheshwari,
2001).
2.9.3 Regeneration from Multiple Explants
Rao et al., (2005) reported effect of different growth regulators and their
concentration on callus formation and organogenesis in various explants and callus was
studied in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. 2, 4-D and NAA alone or in
51
combination with Kn supported callus induction and further growth. 2, 4-D proved better
than NAA and addition of Kn at 4.6 (µM/l) further enhanced the growth of callus.
Organogenesis was obtained from callus, shoot tip and cotyledonary node explants on
BAP medium. In vitro plant regeneration was also achieved via adventitious shoot-bud
formation from seedling hypocotyls, cotyledonary node (CN) and root explants from 4-
d-old in vitro-germinated seedlings of adzukibean (Vigna angularis) by Avenido and
Hattori, (2000). Explants were grown on medium consisting of MS salts, B5 vitamins,
3.0% (w/v) sucrose and 4.4 µM BA. Shoot buds arose adventitiously at the basipetal cut
of the hypocotyl. 8–10 mm CN explants exhibited significantly higher response.
Plantlets were regenerated from different seedling explants of mungbean on
medium supplemented with different concentrations and combinations of BAP and NAA
by Khatun et al., (2008). Cotyledon explants performed best in callus induction (90.0%)
at the combination of 1 mg/l BAP and 2.5 mg/l NAA. The calli derived from cotyledon,
hypocotyls and root tip were cultured on medium with different concentrations of Kn,
BAP and/or NAA for shoot induction. Regeneration occurred with 62.50% frequency
only from cotyledon calli on 5 mg/l BAP and 0.05 mg/l NAA. Shoot tip cultured for
direct regeneration in the same media.
Pellegrineschi, (1997) achieved shoot regeneration via organogenesis in cowpea
hypocotyls and cotyledons of advanced breeding lines and varieties. Cotyledons and
hypocotyls were tested on media with gradients of several hormonal and putrescine
combinations. Cowpea cotyledons and hypocotyls exhibited a pattern of shoot formation
that occurred in three distinct phases. Wounded region of the primary hypocotyl and
cotyledons showed multiple shoots within 45 days in media with high cytokinin.
Brar et al., (1997a) cultured shoot tip and leaf disk explants in two cultivar, Early
Scarlet and 91-245 of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Multiple shoots were produced from
shoot tips cultured on media with 5 mg/l kinetin and 0.01 mg/l NAA. Leaf disks were
cultured on MS media supplemented with 0.5 mg/l BAP and 1 mg/l 2,4-D. Callus growth
was highest on media of full strength MS with 0.5 mg/l BAP and 1 mg/l 2,4-D. The
effects of the media constituents were genotype dependent, with Early Scarlet generally
producing larger shoots and greater amounts of calli. Study showed that the plant
genotype and growth hormones have the greatest influence on cowpea growth in vitro.
Avenido and Hautea, (1990) reported in vitro organogenesis and flowering in
mung bean Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Callus was induced from cotyledon, epicotyl and
leaf segments of mung bean on MS medium supplemented with 2 mg/l 2,4-D and 0.1-
52
0.2mg/l BAP. Root formation occurred on medium with 2mg/l BAP. Multiple shoots
were directly formed from cotyledonary nodes on medium with 1 mg/l BAP. Plantlets
produced from them initiated flowering after two months of subculturing for rooting.
Plant regeneration was achieved using stem, epicotyl and cotyledon explants,
while shoots were regenerated from leaf sections of Vigna radiata (Mendoza and
Futsuhara, 1990). Explants differed in hormonal requirements included in the MS or B5
basal medium. Stem, leaf and epicotyl explants required the addition of 0.2 mg NAA and
1 or 2 mg kinetin or 6-BA (benzyladenine)/litre to give optimal concentrations. No auxin
additions were required for cotyledon cultures wherein regeneration occurred only at the
proximal ends; addition of 1 or 2 mg kinetin or 6-BA and 100 mg yeast extract/litre gave
efficient plant regeneration. Regeneration ability varied with genotype.
Mathews, (1987) observed morphogenetic response of in vitro cultured seedling
explants of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Direct induction of shoots/plants was
possible from shoot tip, cotyledon and cotyledonary node explants. Dedifferentiation of
the explants viz; shoot tip, cotyledons, cotyledonary node, primordial leaves, and roots
were obtained on basal medium supplemented with auxin and cytokinin. Shoot
regeneration was limited to primary calli while rhizogenesis was of common occurrence
in established calli. Badere et al., (2002) suggested that medium supplemented with 0. 1
mg/l NAA and 0.1 to 0.7 mg/l BAP was most effective in inducing multiple shooting and
cotyledonary node with cotyledon was found to be the best explant for multiple shooting.
2.10 Herbicide Induced Oxidative Stress
Several classes of herbicides have been found to result in ROS generation, either
by direct involvement in radical production or by inhibition of biosynthetic pathways
(Hess, 2000; Garcia-Plazaola et al., 2002; Kim and Lee, 2005; Artetxe et al., 2006).
These herbicides exacerbate the production of ROS, causing a rapid photo bleaching
when treated plants are exposed to light (Hess, 2000; Artetxe et al., 2006). The herbicide
bipyridinium generates ROS directly in light (Kim and Lee, 2005). Compounds such as
paraquat (methyl viologen) induce light-dependent oxidative damage in plants. These
ROS initiates lipid peroxidation of PUFAs (Hess, 2000). Other compounds, such as
acifluorfen methyl, which blocks photosynthetic electron transport, and norflurazon,
which inhibits carotenoid (CAR) biosynthesis, initiate photo-oxidative processes most
probably via the generation of 1O2 (Artetxe et al., 2006, Karuppanapandian et al., 2011).
53
2.10.1 Catalase (H2O2: H2O2 Oxidoreductase; EC 1.11.1.6)
CATs have been implicated in herbicide tolerance in several plant species. Cat1
transcript increased in the norflurazon-treated scutella of maize W64A (standard maize
line) and WDN10 (CAT-2/CAT-3 double null mutant) lines (Jung et al., 2006). In
another study, Jung, (2003) showed that Cat1 transcript increased greatly in response to
norflurazon in leaves and mesocotyls of two maize lines: W64A (an inbred line) and
A130-1 (an SOD mutant). In A130-1, Cat2 transcript increased in mesocotyls after upon
norflurazon treatment. A study by Ananieva et al., (2004) revealed that treatment of
twelve-day-old barley seedlings with 10 µM/l paraquat caused over a 40% increase in the
activity of CAT. CATs hold a great significance in plant tolerance towards the herbicide
paraquat (trade name for N,N'-Dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridinium dichloride, a viologen).
Lee and An, (2005) showed that three hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) CAT
genes (CaCat1, CaCat2, and CaCat3) expressed differentially after paraquat treatment.
CaCat1 mRNA increased at 4-12 h in leaves in the paraquat-treated plants; however,
CaCAT1 mRNA did not show same induction in the paraquat-treated stems. Willekens et
al., (1997) used Cat1AS (containing a Cat1 antisense cassette) and co-suppressed CatGH
(containing a Cat1 antisense cassette, and a cassette for sense expression of the cotton
catalase SU2) transgenic lines of Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Petit Havana SR1. Both these
lines had approximately 10% of wild-type CAT activity. It was found that these CAT-
deficient lines showed increased susceptibility towards paraquat as compared to the wild
type tobacco plants, thereby confirming the protective role of CAT against paraquat. The
study also confirmed that CAT functions as a sink for H2O2.
Batish et al., (2006) reported that 2-benzoxazolinone (BOA), a potential
herbicidal candidate and a well-known allelochemical, caused oxidative stress in P.
aureus (mung bean) by generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). A significant
increase in the activity of scavenging enzymes like CAT and SOD was found in the root
and leaf tissue of the herbicide-treated mung bean plants. The study concluded that BOA
induces oxidative stress in mung bean through generation of ROS and upregulation of
activities of various scavenging enzymes. Oxyfluorfen and diuron are the two herbicides
commonly used in champagne vineyards. These herbicides are known to generate
reactive oxygen species (ROS), and thereby causing oxidative stress (lipid peroxidation,
DNA damage, and protein degradation). The toxic effects of these herbicides were
studied on the microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus (Geoffroy et al., 2002). Oxyfluorfen
significantly induced CAT activity. The activities of other antioxidant enzymes were also
54
increased; the antioxidant enzyme activities were used as biomarkers of toxicity. In three
terrestrial plant species, oat (Avena sativa L.), Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L.
cv. chinensis) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), CAT activity and so also the activity of 3
other antioxidant enzymes SOD, peroxidase, and glutathione reductase was found to
increase after exposure to herbicide sodium trichloroacetate (Radetski et al., 2000). The
activities of all the 4 enzymes showed the increase at the lowest concentration of the
herbicide tested. Germination rate and biomass were also decreased significantly.
Transgenic plants carrying CAT genes are also found to show increased tolerance to
paraquat. Mohamed et al., (2003) showed that tomato transgenic plants carrying the E.
coli katE gene (a CAT) were less damaged than the wild-type plants when exposed to
100 μM paraquat and high light illumination (800 μmol/ m-2
s-1
). The transgenic plants
showed increased tolerance to the oxidative damage as well. Harper and Harvey, (1978)
compared 4 paraquat-tolerant lines and 11 paraquat-susceptible cultivars of perennial
ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) grown under controlled conditions. It was found that
paraquat-tolerant lines showed significantly higher activities of CAT than susceptible
cultivars.
2.10.2 Peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.7)
Peroxidases are also known to play significant role in helping plants tolerate
higher herbicide doses; and help overcome oxidative stress produced by herbicides.
Wang and Zhou, (2006) reported that an increased peroxidase activity was responsible
for counteracting the oxidative stress generated after chlorimuron-ethyl herbicide
treatment in wheat. Li et al., (2007) studied the response of two rice varieties (that
differed in susceptibility to the herbicide) to bound residues of metsulfuron-methyl in
paddy soils. The two rice varieties were differentially susceptible to the herbicide:
Xiushui 63, a sensitive rice variety, and Zhenong 952, a resistant variety. It was found
that peroxidase activity was higher in the roots of the sensitive rice variety. Irrespective
of the two varieties tested, the changes in the enzyme activities were greater in the roots
as compared to leaves. Rehmannia glutinous L. plants show the unique characteristic of
intrinsic tolerance to paraquat herbicide. The enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities are
found responsible for conferring intrinsic paraquat tolerance to R. glutinosa plants (Choi
et al., 2004). The antioxidant activities of R. glutinosa were compared with that of
soybean. The peroxidase activity was 2.7-fold higher in paraquat-tolerant R. glutinosa
than in paraquat-susceptible soybeans. Yamato et al., (1994) purified and characterized a
protoporphyrinogen-oxidizing enzyme having peroxidase activity. The enzyme was
55
purified from tobacco cultured cells. The enzyme showed peroxidase activity toward
guaiacol and pyrogallol. It was also found that the purified enzyme was not inhibited by
herbicides that inhibit protoporphyrinogen oxidase. This showed that this peroxidase
enzyme was responsible for giving herbicide resistance in the tobacco cultured cells.
Transgenic plants overexpressing peroxidases also show enhanced tolerance towards
herbicides. Tateshi et al., (2001) introduced an aspen peroxidase gene prxA3a into
tobacco plants. The transgenic plants showed increased herbicide-tolerance against
paraquat, DCMU and atrazine; this study further confirms the importance of peroxidases
in herbicide tolerance.
2.10.3 Superoxide Dismutase (EC 1.15.1.1)
Superoxide dismutases (SOD; E C 1.15.1.1), originally discovered by McCord
and Fridovich in 1969 (McCord and Fridovich, 1969), react with superoxide radicals at
almost diffusion-limited rates to produce hydrogen peroxide. The enzyme is central to
the defense mechanism against oxidative stress. Plants contain a mitochondrial matrix
localized MnSOD and a cytosolic Cu/ZnSOD, with FeSOD and/or Cu/Zn SOD present
in the chloroplast stroma. Chloroplastic SOD is generally the most abundant SOD in
green leaves, while in germinating seedlings and in etiolated material the cytoplasmic
and mitochondrial SODs are prevalent (Foster and Edwards, 1980; Jackson et al., 1978;
Kanematsu and Asada, 1989; Kanematsu and Asada, 1990; Tsang et al., 1991). The
expression of SODs is to some extent determined by the availability of their metal
cofactors (del Rio et al., 1991).
Any perturbation in photosynthetic activity can cause the formation of reactive
oxygen species initiating either from photosystem I, ferredoxin, or excited chlorophyll.
Therefore, herbicides that directly affect chloroplast activity can stimulate processes that
induce damaging oxygen species. Bipyridyl herbicides such as paraquat and diquat
increase oxidative stress by generating oxygen radicals. Both these herbicides appear to
mediate identical effects. Paraquat, also known as methyl viologen (1, l’-dimethyl-4,4’-
bipyridinium chloride), is a redox-active compound that is photoreduced by photosystem
I and subsequently reoxidized by transfer of its electrons to oxygen, forming the
superoxide anion (Asada and Takahashi, 1987; Halliwell, 1984; Rabinowitch et al.,
1983).
SOD has often been correlated with paraquat survival. In E. coli, which contains
both MnSOD and FeSOD, the former enzyme is induced by paraquat (Hassan and
Fridovich, 1977). Paraquat is found to induce about 40 different proteins in E. coli,
56
including antioxidant and repair enzymes. Some of these are positively regulated at the
transcriptional level by a gene product of the soxR locus (Greenberg et al., 1990; Tsaneva
and Weiss, 1990). The importance of SOD in paraquat survival has been shown by the
isolation of an SOD-deficient mutant that is hypersensitive to paraquat (Carlioz and
Touati, 1986).
The SOD activity was found to increase in the green alga Chlorella sorokiniana
grown in sublethal concentrations of paraquat. The increase was found to be due to the
synthesis of a new MnSOD isozyme (Rabinowitch et al., 1983). This induced MnSOD
activity, together with other protective enzymes, confers resistance to higher doses of the
herbicide. Similarly, treatment of duckweed (Spirodela oligorrhiza (Kurz) Hegelm.) with
benzyl viologen leads to an increase in SOD activity, which is a factor in the plant’s
resistance to paraquat (Lewinsohn and Gressel, 1984).
The treatment of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Chia et al., 1982) and Lemna (Srivastave
and Tel-Or, 1991) leaves caused a general increase in SOD activity. In Nicotiana
plumbaginifolia L., chloroplastic, cytosolic, and mitochondrial SOD expression was
analyzed at the mRNA level, and all three were strongly induced by paraquat (Tsang et
al., 1991).
Besides being involved in paraquat survival, SODs are also important in the
metabolism of noxious pollutants like ozone and sulfur dioxide (Bowler et al., 1992).
However, the importance of SOD in plant protection to sulfur dioxide is well-
established, but the evidence for its involvement in ozone resistance is often indirect and
inconclusive.
SOD activity is found to increase up to 13-fold in Iris pseudacorus L. during the
anoxic phase. In the flooding-sensitive Iris germanica L., similar increase in the SOD
activity is not observed. This increase reflects the importance of SOD in plants during
waterlogging and drought. SOD may play a more direct role in the defense of plants
against fungi of the genus Cercospora, a large group of fungal pathogens that cause
damaging leaf spot diseases on a wide range of economically important crops (Bowler et
al., 1992). Thus, it is evident that SODs are also pivotal in relieving plants from stresses
caused by atmospheric pollutants, waterlogging and drought, and plant pathogens.
2.11 Effect of Glyphosate on Morphological and Biochemical Parameters
Glyphosate treatment causes alterations in phyiology and morphology of target
crops, nontarget crops and microorganisms. There are several publications that points out
effect of glyphosate on morphological and biochemical parameters of plants.
57
Huang et al., (2012) studied effect of glyphosate on growth of weed cogongrass
(Imperata cylindrical L.). The photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, chlorophyll a
and b content, proline content and shikimic acid content were assessed at the second,
fifth, and ninth day after treatment with different concentration levels of glyphosate (0%,
0.3%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0%). Chlorophyll a and b content decreased significantly after
treatment.
Parween et al., (2012) evaluated the effect of chlorpyrifos on several metabolic
and stress related parameters of Vigna radiata L. Twenty-day-old plants were exposed to
several concentrations of chlorpyrifos, ranging from 0 to 1.5 mM through foliar spray in
the field condition. Lipid peroxidation rate, proline, dehydroascorbate, oxidized and total
glutathione were all increased. Chlorpyrifos enhanced lipid peroxidation rate and proline
content with 1.5 mM at Day 20 whereas dehydroascorbate, oxidized and total glutathione
were increased in 1.5 mM at Day 10. Activities of superoxide dismutase, ascorbate
peroxidase and glutathione reductase enhanced significantly in all the concentrations at
Day 10. Maximum catalase activity was observed at Day 10 in control and it declined
thereafter.
Aioub et al., (1993) compared phytotoxic effects of 30 µM mercury (II) chloride
and 50 µM acifluorfen on corn (maize) and found it similar. Acifluorfen treatment
elevated MDA levels. Ahsan et al., (2008) reported glyphosate-induced oxidative stress
in rice leaves revealed by proteomic approach. Two-week-old rice leaves were subjected
to glyphosate or a reactive oxygen species (ROS) inducing herbicide paraquat, and total
soluble proteins were extracted and analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-
DE) coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-
TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. 18 proteins were found up-regulated and 7
proteins were down-regulated. Rubisco large subunit was significantly decreased by the
treatment of both herbicides. An increased accumulation of antioxidant enzymes
including superoxide dismutase in the glyphosate-treated sample suggests that a
glyphosate treatment possibly generates oxidative stress in plants. Increase in
thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) concentration revealed that the
glyphosate application generates ROS, which resulted in the peroxidation and destruction
of lipids in the rice leaves.
Chen and Polatnick, (1991) studied comparative effect of artemisinin, 2,4-D, and
glyphosate in mung bean. At 5 µM all these compounds inhibited root induction in mung
58
bean (Phaseolus aureus) seedling cuttings. Artemisinin also caused inhibition in growth
like glyphosate.
Elevated antioxidant response and induction of tau-class glutathione S-transferase
after glyphosate treatment in Vigna radiata was reported by Basantani et al., (2011).
Elevated expression of the oxidative stress enzymes and induction of tau-class GSTs
after glyphosate treatment in the seedling roots of two Vigna radiata varieties was found
after glyphosate treatment. Nemat Alla and Hasan, (2007) studied that isoproturon
induced significant accumulations of H2O2 in the leaves of 10-d-old maize seedlings, the
accumulation increased with time and also with herbicide dose. SOD activity was
significantly enhanced up to the 12th d whereas ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity was
significantly reduced. Catalase activity were similarly increased during the first 4 d but
decreased from the 12th day. Low doses increased SOD and guaiacol peroxidase (GPX)
activities but high doses led to diminutions whereas CAT and APX were reduced by all
doses.
Chloropyrifos and malathion generate xenobiotic / pollution stress on tomato and
brinjal leading to creation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in them which culminate the
plants into death through cellular damages (Nasrabadi et al., 2011). Scavenging of ROS
through stimulation of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD and PPO is the most
adaptive mechanism for the tolerance of pollution. Both the pesticides have caused
highly significant stimulation in the activities of SOD, POD and PPO, and it increased
with the increasing dose of chloropyrifos and malathion.
Wang and Zhou, (2006) reported effects of herbicide chlorimuron-ethyl on
physiological mechanisms in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Chlorimuron-ethyl elevated
MDA content in leaves and roots after a 1-day. The 300 mg/kg chlorimuron-ethyl
treatment caused significant damage to chlorophyll accumulation. The POD activity in
roots was higher than in leaves. The damage to the antioxidative defence systems is
affected by the concentration and exposure time, and the defensive effect is completely
lost with prolonged exposure. Herbicide caused a significant decrease of soluble protein
content and SOD activity in the leaves and roots. Qian et al., (2008) studied effects of
glufosinate on antioxidant enzymes, in the unicellular green alga Chlorella vulgaris.
Exposure to glufosinate increased MDA content by up to 2.73 times compared with the
control. Activities of the antioxidant enzymes SOD, peroxidase POD, and CAT also
increased markedly in the presence of glufosinate.
59
Wu and Von Tiedemann, (2002) reported enhancement of plant antioxidative
enzymes and the enhanced scavenging of potentially harmful O2- by fungicides as a
mechanism of protecting plants against noxious oxidative stress from the environment.
They found that fungicide treatments of barley plants at growth stage (GS) 32
significantly increased the total leaf soluble protein content and activities of the
antioxidative enzymes SOD, catalase (CAT). Treatment of herbicide chlorotoluron in
soil in wheat resulted in the peroxidation of plasma membrane lipids in the plant. Proline
level increased significantly in chlorotoluron-exposed roots and leaves. The total activity
of POD in roots was significantly enhanced. Activities of APX in roots and leaves
showed a similar pattern. The CAT activities were generally suppressed under the
chlorotoluron exposure (Song et al., 2007).Chao et al., (2007) found that MDA level
detected in the leaves of wheat after 1 day exposure of acetochlor which decreased after
prolonged exposure, indicated the presence of poisoning AOS. They suggested that
chlorophyll and soluble protein could be considered as biomarkers of stress by
acetochlor in soil, activity of POD and contents of MDA could not be considered
as biomarkers of stress by acetochlor in soil and role of SOD as biomarkers of stress is
doubtful.
Nemat Alla and Hasan, (2007) found that after treatment of isoproturon in maize,
SOD activity was significantly enhanced up to the 12th day whereas APX activity was
significantly reduced after the fourth day onwards. CAT and GPX activities were
similarly increased during the first 4 d but decreased from the 12th and the eighth day,
respectively. Low doses increased SOD and GPX activities but high doses lead to
diminutions whereas CAT and APX were reduced by all doses. Stajner et al., (2003)
found that paraquat (1.0 and 2.0 µM) treatment inhibits germination and SOD and CAT
activities in seeds. In leaves, lower concentrations of these herbicides increased activities
of antioxidant enzymes but at the highest herbicide concentrations (200 M) activities of
investigated enzymes declined. The pigment contents the leaves decreased due to
alachlor and metolachlor treatment in a concentration dependent manner. Growth of
wheat seedlings with isoproturon was inhibited (Yin et al., 2008). Chlorophyll content
significantly decreased at the low concentration of isoproturon (2 mg/kg), suggesting that
chlorophyll was rather sensitive to isoproturon exposure. Activities of the antioxidant
enzymes showed a general increase at low isoproturon concentrations and a decrease at
high isoproturon concentrations. Activities of CAT in leaves showed progressive
suppression under the isoproturon exposure.
60
Kitchen et al., (1981) found that glyphosate significantly decreased the
chlorophyll content of field-grown soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr. 'Williams') within 48
h after a 2.24-kg/ha treatment. In studies with 8-day-old etiolated corn shoots, 0.1, 1.0,
and 10.0 mM glyphosate decreased chlorophyll content of corn shoots 24, 42, and 50%,
respectively, after 12 h of illumination.
Table 2.1: In vitro selection for abiotic sress tolerance
Plants Agronomic traits Referances
Sugarcane Ametryn Zambrano et al., (1999)
Glyphosate Zambrano et al., (2003)
Wheat Atrazine, difenzoquat,
picloram
Bozorgipour and Snape, (1997)
Tobacco Picloram Chaleff and Parsons, (1978)
Barley Chlorsulfuron Baillie et al., (1993)
Sugarbeet Chlorsulfuron Saunders et al., (1992)
Brassica Chlorosulfuron Swanson et al., (1988)
Maize, barley Glyphosate Racchi et al., (1995); Escorial et al.,
(1996)
Tobacco Glyphosate Dyer et al., (1988)
Gram Endosulfan Saxena and Beg, (1988)
Brown sarson Endosalfan Arya et al., (1994)
Seashore paspalum Sethoxydim Heckart et al., (2010)
Maize Sethoxydim Parker et al., (1989)
Tomato Paraquat Thomas and Pratt, (1982)
Red clover 2, 4-D Taylor et al., (1989)
Strawberry Triazine Malone and Dix, (1990)
Cotton Sulfonylurea, imidazolinone
herbicides
Rajasekaran et al., (1996)
Alfalfa Salt tolerance Winicov, (1991); Smith and McComb,
(1983)
Rice, Wheat Salt tolerance Winicov, (1996); Barakat and Abdel-
Latif, (1996)
Potato Salt tolerance Ochatt et al., (1999)
61
Brassica, Salt tolerance Kirti et al., (1991)
Tomato Salt tolerance Boscherini et al., (1999)
Foeniculum
vulgare
Salt Khorami and Safarnejad, (2011).
Habanero Pepper Salt Solís-Marroquín et al., (2011)
Rice Salt Shanthi et al., (2010)
Sugarcane Salinity Gandonou et al., (2006)
Wheat Salt Barakat and Abdel Latif, (1996)
Rice Salt Krishna Raj and SreeRangasamy,
(1993), Shankhadhar et al., (2000).
Sweet potato Salt Luan et al., (2007)
Potato Salt Queiros et al., (2007)
Brassica juncea Salt and Mannitol Gangopadhyay et al. (1995).
Alfa alfa Osmotic Dragiiska et al., (1996)
Tomato Water stress Singh and Sharma, (2008)
Helianthus Water Hassan et al.,(2004)
Rice Drought tolerance Adkins et al.,(1995)
Sorghum Drought tolerance Smith et al., (1985)
Wheat Frost tolerance Dorffling et al., (1993)
Rice Cold tolerance Bertin and Bouharmont, (1997)
Sugarbeet UV-B tolerance Levall and Bornman, (1993)
Setaria italica Zinc tolerance Samantaray et al., (1999)
62
Table 2.2: In vitro selection of stress tolerant genotypes.
Crop Stress Referance
Potato Salinity Zhang and Donnelly, (1997)
Catharanthus Salinity Garg, (2010),
Tomato osmotic Aazami et al.,(2010)
Tomato Drought Kulkarni and Deshpande, (2007)
Rice Salinity Wani et al., (2010), Zinna et al., (2013)
KrishnaRaj and SreeRangasamy, (1993)
Carthamus Drought Zebarzadi et al.,(2010),
Cucumber Salinity Malik et al., (2010)
Sweet potato Salinity Anwar et al.,(2010), Dasgupta et al., (2008)
Brassica Salinity Jain et al., (1990)
Strawberry Salinity Dziadczyk et al., (2003)
Rice Draught Biswas et al., (2002)
Sorghum Soil stress Duncan et al.,(1995)
Spearmint Salinity Al-Amier andker, (2007)
Wheat Salinity Abdel hady, (2006)
Date palm Salt Al mansoori et al., (2006)
Wheat Herbicide Kondic et al., (2009); Bozorgipour and Snape
(1991)
Mulberry
Salinity Vijayan et al., (2004)
Salt and
osmotic stress
Tewary et al., (2000)
Groundnut Salt Mungala et al., (2008)
Chickpea Freezing Akhar et al., (2011)
Prunus Spp. Drought Sorkheh et al., (2011)
Potato Water stress Gopal and Iwama, (2007)., Hassanpanah,
(2010)
Sunflower Water stress Turhan and Baser, (2004).
Soyabean Drought Sakthivelu et al., (2008)
Cotton Metal stress Biçakçi and Memon, (2005).
Grapevine Lime induced
chlorosis
Bavaresco et al., (1993)
Wheat Frost Moraru et al., (1997)
Vigna mungo moisture
deficit stress
Yadav et al., (2013)
63
3.0 Materials and Methods
3.1 The Plant Material Used in the Present Study: Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper
3.1.1 Classification
Kingdom Plantae – Plants
Subkingdom Tracheobionta – Vascular plants
Superdivision Spermatophyta – Seed plants
Division Magnoliophyta – Flowering plants
Class Magnoliopsida – Dicotyledons
Subclass- Rosidae
Order -Fabales
Family- Fabaceae – Pea family
Genus -Vigna Savi – cowpea
Species -Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper – black gram
Black gram is an annual, semi-erect to spreading herb growing to a height of 25-
90 cm. Stems are diffuse, branching, sometimes procumbent, and covered with long
dense brown or black hairs. It possesses strong tap root system with many laterals.
Leaves are pinnately trifoliate, hairy with large ovate to lanceolate and entire leaflets.
Flowers are pale yellow, small with a yellow spirally coiled keel. The flowers are borne
in clusters of 5-6 on a short hairy peduncle in axillary racemes. Pods are short, erect to
sub erect, 4-7 cm long and 0.6 cm wide, brown to black in colour, hairy and with stout
hooked beak, containing about 6-10 seeds. Seeds are small, oblong slightly truncated at
ends measuring 4-5.2 mm long and 3.5-4.1 mm wide; thousand seeds weight is around
40 g with varying colour from black, dark brown to green. The testa is smooth and hilum
white and concave. Pods do not shatter readily. Flowers are self-fertile and self
pollinated. Flowering is indeterminate.
3.1.2 Genotypes used in Present Study
1. PU-19
2. PU-35
3. PU-31
4. IPU-94-1
5. Azad-1
6. Azad-2
64
3.1.3 Germplasm Collection
The six genotypes of leguminous plant Vigna mungo, were selected for our
investigations. The seeds of these were used as material in the experiment. The seeds
were bought from Indian Institute of Pulse Esearch (IIPR), Kanpur, these were used as
starting material for the experiment. As there were seeds of different size and color, so
seeds of same average size and of same color were selected to perform experiments.
Selection of seeds done carefully so as to select, the healthy and viable seeds, to get most
accurate result in the experiment, seed of uniform morphology and color were only used
for experiment.
3.2 Methods of Screening
Following in vitro methods has been used for screening of herbicide tolerant
genotypes
3.2.1. Petridish germination screening
3.2.2 In vitro germination screening in MS medium
3.2.3 In vitro culture screening
3.2.3.1. In vitro assessment of tolerance based on morphogenic response of various
explants on herbicide supplemented medium.
3.2.3.2. Gradual stress treatment of callus cultures
3.2.3.3 Shock treatment of callus cultures
3.2.4. In vivo evaluation of herbicide effect on selected genotypes in field under wire
house conditions.
3.2.1. Petridish Germination Screening (Petridish Bioassay)
The seeds were thoroughly washed with double distilled or autoclaved water
before conducting any experiment. In order to screen the genotypes for herbicide
tolerance the seeds were grown in petridishes, using moist blotting paper method.
Glyphosate solutions of increasing concentrations were prepared using isopropylamine
salt of glyphosate (41%) in autoclaved water. The glyphosate concentrations employed
were, 1 mM, 2 mM, 4 mM, 6 mM, 8 mM, and 10 mM. The control seeds were treated
with water only. The seeds of six genotypes of Vigna mungo were soaked for 24 hrs in
the glyphosate/roundup solutions, or water in case of control. All the treatments were
given in triplicate. After soaking the seeds for 24 hrs, they were thoroughly washed with
autoclaved water and placed on moist filter paper in petridishes, for germination. The
seeds were watered each day. Readings were taken after 2, 7 and 10 days. In order to
avoid infection, the blotting paper was changed every 2 days. The growth parameters
65
studied were germination, survival, shoot length, root length, fresh weight, and dry
weight. Fresh weight was taken using electric pan (Eagle digital) balance. Dry weight
was taken after drying seedlings for 24 hour at 70ºC till the weight stabilized. To assess
tolerance various parameters were calculated:
Germination percentage was calculated by
Number of seeds germinatedGermination percentage = 100
Total number of seeds
Survival percentage was calculated by
Number of seedlings survivedSurvival percentage = 100
Total number of seeds
Percentage of phytotoxicity was calculated according to Chou et al., (1978)
Radicle length of control - Radicle length of treatment 100
Radicle length of control
Vigour index of seedling was calculated according to Abdul-Baki and Anderson, (1973).
Vigour index Germination percentage length of seedlings
Tolerance index of seedlings was calculated according to Turner and Marshal, (1972).
Mean length of longest root in treatmentTolerance index =
Mean length of longest root in control
3.2.2 In vitro Germination Screening
• Seeds collected from homogeneous population of six varieties of black gram PU-
19, PU-35, IPU-94-1, PU-31, Azad-1 and Azad-2 were grown on Murashige and
Skoog’ basal medium supplemented with various concentrations of herbicide (0.1
mM, 0.2 mM, 0.4 mM, 0.6 mM and 0.8 mM)
• Readings were taken after 2, 7 and 15 days after inoculation (DAI) and on the
basis of observations made on parameters like germination percentage, survival
percentage, root length, shoot length, seedling fresh weight they were classified
as tolerant, moderately tolerant and susceptible.
• Effect of herbicide was also assessed on biochemical parameters like activity of
antioxidative enzymes catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX), superoxide dismutase
(SOD), protein content and proline content in seedlings.
3.2.3. In vitro Culture Screening
3.2.3.1 Screening via Response of Explants in Herbicide Media
• Seeds germination on MS basal medium.
66
• Explants, like epicotyl, hypocotyl, cotyledonary node, shoot apex and leaf
segments obtained from 7-8 days old seedlings transferred on medium with
different levels of herbicide (stress) and plant growth regulators. Herbicide free
media was treated as control.
• Percentage of morphogenic response, callus fresh weight, number of shoots per
explant, shoot length, number of roots per explant and root length were
determined.
• On the basis of above said parameterers better performing cultures on high stress
media were treated as tolerant.
3.2.3.2 Gradual stress treatment of callus cultures
• After establishing callus, shoot and root cultures in stress free media they were
gradually transferred into media with higher concentration of glyphosate with
same or altered concentration of plant growth regulators.
• Glyphosate concentrations of 0 mM (control), 0.01 mM, 0.05 mM, 0.1 mM 0.2
mM, and 0.4 mM were added to MS proliferation media. 20 ml media was
poured in each test tube. In gradual treatment method, callus and shoot cultures
were gradually exposed to herbicide stress by first culturing them on non stress
media/non selective media without herbicide (control). Callus grown on control
media were incubated for three weeks. After three weeks a portion of callus was
subcultured on control media and another portion was subcultured on media with
0.01 mM glyphosate. After three weeks one portion of callus was subcultured on
media with 0.01 mM and another portion on media with 0.05 mM. Similarly
calluses were subcultured up to 0.4 mM media. After four weeks, cultures
surviving on 0.01 mM, 0.05 mM, 0.1 mM, 0.2 mM and 0.4 mM were used for
data collection i.e. fresh weight, tolerance index and percent of surviving
cultures.
Tolerance index (callus) was calculated according to LaRosa et al., (1989)
Fresh weight of callus in stress mediaTolerance index = 100
Fresh weight of callus in control media
3.2.3.3 Shock treatment of callus cultures
• Initially cultures were grown in herbicide free media. Then these cultures were
transferred to stress media
• Callus and shoot cultures cultures grown in stress free media were directly
transferred to high stress media 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 mM. Among 60 cultures grown
67
in stress free media 15 cultures were transferred to media of each herbicide
concentration.
3.2.4. In Vivo Evaluation of Tolerant Genotypes
Three better performing genotypes of black gram screened on the basis of
petridish screening, in vitro germination screening and in vitro culture screening were
sown in field under wire house conditions. At the three leaf stage post emergence spray
treatment of herbicide glyphosate was given to plants. Toxicity symptoms and change in
biochemical parameters like chlorophyll content, protein content, proline content, MDA
content and status of antioxidative enzymes like catalase, peroxidase and superoxide
dismutase were studied after 3-4 days of treatment. Effect of herbicide on growth and
yield parameters were also assessed in three better performing genotypes.
3.3 Surface Sterilization of Plant Materials
For the in vitro screening of tolerance seeds of six genotypes were first washed
thoroughly under filtered running tap water for 10 minutes and then treated with 2-3
drops of tween -20 per 50 ml, for 10 min and then washed with distilled water 2-3 times.
Addition of few drops of detergent helps in removing the waxy coating and also reduces
surface tension (acts as surfactant). Subsequently they were further sterilized under
aseptic conditions, in a laminar flow cabinet with 0.1% HgCl2 solution for 10 minutes
and washed 4-5 times with distilled water. Lastly material was treated with quick dip of
90% alcohol and washed with autoclaved distilled water.
3.4 Sterilization of Nutrient Media and other Items
Sterilization of nutrient media, instruments, beakers, petridishes, distilled water
etc was done by autoclaving at 1.08 kg cm-2
for 15 minutes.
3.5 Inoculum and Inoculation
3.5.1 Inoculum
Sterilized seeds were inoculated in MS basal media.1-2 seeds were inoculated in
each test tube containing 20 ml of 0.8% agarified MS medium (either basal or
supplemented with plant growth regulators) with flamed/sterilized forceps. Various
explants like hypocotyl, epicotyl, cotyledonary node leaf segments and shoot apices were
excised from 7-8 day old in vitro grown seedlings. These explants were inoculated in
various selective (herbicide supplemented) and non selective media (herbicide free) to
assess effect of herbicide on callus induction, organogenesis, callus weight, number of
shoots and roots.
68
3.5.2 Inoculation
Explants to be inoculated were cut from seedlings under aseptic conditions in a
laminar air flow cabinet and inoculation was carried out by using distilled water and 95%
alcohol. Besides, a spirit lamp was also used for periodic resterilization of used
instruments during inoculation. During inoculation neck of test tubes and test tube caps
were warmed over flame to avoid contamination. In most of the experiments one or two
explant were inoculated per culture tube with cut basal end inserted in agarified medium
supplemented with hormones and herbicides.
3.6 Culture Media
Different growth media were used for the initial experiment but since the best
response was obtained in Murashige and Skoog medium (1962) it was used for all the
subsequent experiments. Four different stock solutions of major elements, minor
elements and vitamins were prepared in distilled water. All the stock solutions were
stored in a refrigerator at 4-50C. To prepare one liter of solution, desired quantities of
sucrose (30.0g) and agar (8.0g) were weighed. The required quantities of stock solutions
(A, B, C and D) containing major elements, minor and the organic nutrients were
measured in conical flask. Sucrose was used as carbon source at a concentration of 30g/l.
The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.7 by using 1N HCl and 1N NaOH. The final
volume was made up to 1 liter with distilled water. In the end weighed agar was added
and the solution was boiled with constant stirring to homogenize the contents and the
growth regulators were added as required. The medium was again boiled so as to ensure
complete blending of growth regulators. About 15-20ml of medium was dispensed into
each test tube and plugged with nonabsorbent surgical cotton wrapped in muslin/or
auotoclavable test tube caps. The medium was autoclaved at 15-kg/cm3 pressure for 15-
20 min at 1210C and the solidification was done at room temperature. Apart from this,
flasks containing distilled water, petridishes, instruments like a pair of forceps, blades
etc. were also autoclaved at same pressure, wrapped with aluminum foil. The equipment
was taken out when the pressure of the autoclave came down to zero, and was placed in
an aseptic room. The composition of Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium is as follows
in (Table -1 and 2).
3.6.1 Variations of Media used in Study
1.MS basal media without growth hormone and herbicide.
2.MS basal media with herbicide but without growth hormone.
69
3.MS basal media with growth hormone but without herbicide (non selective
media.
4.MS basal media with growth hormone and various concentrations of
herbicide.
Table -3.1: Inorganic Constituents
Major element Amount (mg/l) Minor elements Amount (mg/l)
NH4NO3 1650.00 ZnSO4.7H2O 8.60
KNO3 1900.00 MnSO4.4H2O 22.30
CaCl2H2O 440.00 CuSO4.5 H2O 00.02
MgSO47H2O 370.00 CoCl.6H2O 00.25
KH2PO4 170.00 KI 00.83
Na2EDTA 37.00 H3BO3 06.20
FeSO47H2O 27.00 Na2MoO42H2O 0.25
Table -3.2: Organic Constituents
Amino acid and Vitamins Amount (mg/l)
Glycine 2.0
Myo-inositol 100.00
Nicotinic Acid 0.5
Pyridoxin HCl 0.5
Thiamine HCl 0.1
The stock solutions were prepared in distilled autoclaved water and then stored in the
refrigerator.
3.7 Growth Regulators
Depending upon the nature of the experiment the basal medium was
supplemented with various concentrations and combinations of the following growth
regulators, which were prepared as follows in (Table -3.3)
70
Table-3.3: Growth Regulator Preparation
Growth
Regularos
Abbrev-
iations
Amount
(mg)
Dissolved in
(ml)
Final volume
with H2O (ml)
α- Naphthalene
acetic acid NAA 50
5 ml 80%
ethanol 50
Indole acetic acid IAA 50 5 ml 80%
ethanol 50
2-4Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid 2-4-D 50
5 ml 80%
ethanol 50
6-Benzylamino
Purine BAP 50
5 ml of warm
0.1 N NaOH 50
6- Furfurylamino
Purine Kn 50
5 ml of warm
0.1 N NaOH 50
The composition of culture medium is the most important factor in the successful
establishment of a tissue culture protocol. MS medium consists of a balanced mixture of
micronutrients, macronutrients, vitamins, carbon source, organic growth factors and a
source of reduced N2 supply.
3.8 Explants
Hypocotyls, epicotyls, cotyledonary node, node (explants from field grown
plants) shoot apices and leaf segments of seedlings were used for tissue culture studies.
3.9 Maintenance of Culture
All cultures were grown in an air-conditioned culture room, illuminated by 40-
watt fluorescent tubes. Culture room temperature was maintained at 25±2°C with 16
hours photoperiod at a photo flux density of 1000 Lux approximately. Sub-culturing was
done approximately every 30 -40 days of growth according to the need.
Morphogenetic response has been represented in terms of: -
Percentage of explants that produced callus, roots or shoots
Number of roots per culture
Number of shoots per culture
Length of roots per culture
Length of shoots per culture
Callus fresh weight and dry weight.
71
The percent callus response or percent shoot response was calculated using the
following formula:
Number of explants showing callusing/ shootingPercent callus/shoot response = 100
Total Number of explants inoculated
3.10 Screening of Glyphosate Tolerant Genotypes at Multiple Shoot and Callus
Levels
Mainly three types of selection schemes were employed to screen tolerant
genotypes for herbicide tolerance. The purpose of making such selections is to assess
natural tolerance of black gram genotypes and to improve tolerance by in vitro methods.
In tissue culture method, percent callus response, callus fresh weight, shoot buds and
multiple shoot induction, number and length of shoots were taken as criteria for
screening of tolerance among genotypes. Gradual and shock stress treatment method
were also employed to assess tolerance among genotypes.
For in vitro studies, first culture conditions were standardized and various
explants of seedlings have been exposed to various levels of glyphosate induced
herbicide stress. Stock solution of 30 mM was prepared and to make MS medium with
different glyphosate concentration calculated amount of stock were added into medium.
For example to prepare 25ml stock of 30 mM glyphosate solution, 419.99 µl glyphosate
was added. To prepare 500ml medium of 0.01 mM 0.166 µl of stock was added. For in
vitro germination of seeds in herbicide media no growth regulator was added. While to
observe/assess effect of herbicide on morphogenic response on black gram genotypes
glyphosate were added in MS media supplemented various combinations of growth
regulator.
3.11 Chemicals
All the chemicals used in the present investigation were analytical grade of high
quality, and purchased from authentic sources. Tris buffer, glycine, EDTA, PMSF, CDNB,
reduced glutathione (GSH), NaOH, potassium phosphate were purchased from HiMedia
Ltd, Mumbai., methanol, acetic acid were obtained from Qualigens Fine Chemicals,
Mumbai. Bradford Reagent was purchased from BioRad, USA (Bio-Rad, Inc. Hercules,
California USA). Isopropylamine salt of glyphosate (41%) was obtained from Monsanto,
USA.
The stock solutions were prepared in double distilled water or autoclaved water.
The tris-buffer, phosphate buffer were autoclaved before use. PMSF stock solution was
prepared in iso-propyl alcohol and CDNB stock was prepared in ethanol.
72
3.12 Glyphosate
Glyphosate is a post-emergent, systemic and non-selective (or broad-spectrum)
herbicide used in both agricultural and non-agricultural areas. Recommended application
rates do not exceed 5.8 kg active ingredient per hectare (a.i./ha). It is used to kill all plant
types including grasses, perennials, and woody plants. It is mainly absorbed into the
plant through the leaves and then transported throughout the plant where it acts on the
plant’s enzyme systemic a post-emergent, systemic and non-selective (or broad-
spectrum) herbicide used in both agricultural and non-agricultural areas. In present
investigation round up formulation is used in all experiment which is 41% salt of
isopropylamine +59% inert materials. Rate of application of roundup herbicide in
modern agricultural practices is 2-3 litres of roundup per hectare in 450 litres of water.
3.12.1 Various Glyphosate Concentrations used in Present Study
Genotypes Glyphosate Concentrations Used
In Vivo Studies In vitro culture
Studies
In vitro Germination
Studies
PU-19 Control Control Control
PU-35 1 mM 0.01 mM 0.1 mM
PU-31 2 mM 0.05 mM 0.2 mM
IPU-94-1 4 mM 0.1 mM 0.4 mM
Azad-1 6 mM 0.2 mM 0.6 mM
Azad-2 8 mM 0.4 mM 0.8 mM
10 mM
In developing a screening/selection scheme to select tolerant genotypes, it is
important to know how the crop reacts to herbicide, identify mechanism of herbicide
tolerance. Once the mechanism is identified different genotypes could be studied in order
to determine genotypic differences for tolerance.
3.13 Protein Extraction
Protein content were measured in in vitro grown seedlings and leaves of treated
plants sunder selective media and in plants after 3-5 days of post-emergence spray
treatment of herbicide grown in wire house. In case of in vitro grown seedlings whole
73
seedling and in treated field plants upper leaves were taken for protein extraction. The
seedlings were harvested after 15 days while leaves were taken after 5 days of treatment
for protein extraction. The extracted protein was used for total soluble protein estimation.
The seedlings (0.5 g) were crushed in liquid nitrogen in a mortar and pestle and
homogenized in 2 volumes (w/v) of extraction buffer (0.2 M Tris-Cl pH 7.8, 1 mM
EDTA, 20% glycerol and 2 mM PMSF). The homogenate was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm
for 20 mins. The supernatant was used for protein estimation and enzyme activity assays.
The protein extracts were stored at -20ºC until further use.
3.13.1 Bradford Protein Estimation
Protein was estimated according to the Bradford dye-binding assay (Bradford,
1976). The Bradford dye consists of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250, which binds to
arginine, aromatic amino acid and histidine residues of the protein. The assay is based on
the observation that the absorbance maximum for an acidic solution of Coomassie
Brilliant Blue G-250 shifts from 465 nm to 595 nm when binding to protein occurs. Both
hydrophobic and ionic interactions stabilize the anionic form of the dye, causing a visible
color change (Bradford, 1976).
The 5X Bradford dye (Bio-Rad, USA) was diluted to 1X with water and filtered
through Whatman filter paper no 1. The estimation was done according to
manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad Protein Assay Instruction Manual, #LIT33).
Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as the standard. To perform the assay, 5-10 µL
plant protein extract was diluted to 50 µL with water and mixed with 2.5 ml of 1X
Bradford dye. The mixture was allowed to stay at room temperature for 5 to 10 minutes.
Then optical density was read at A595. First, the standard graph was plotted between A595
and the known amounts of BSA. Thereafter, the A595 of unknown plant protein samples
was observed. The A595 of plant protein samples was compared with A595 of BSA of
known quantities. The protein concentration was expressed in mg protein per g of fresh
weight (FW) tissue.
3.14 Enzyme Assays
3.14.1 Catalase Enzyme Assay
Catalase activity was measured according to Euler and Josephson, (1927). A
2.5% protein extract was prepared. 2 ml citrate phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 1 ml water
and the protein extract were taken in two sets of test tubes. One of the sets was labeled
blank and the other as sample. In the sample, 1ml H2O2 was added and exactly after 10
min the reaction was stopped by adding 2ml 4N H2SO4. In the blank, 2ml 4N H2SO4 was
74
added first and then 1ml H2O2 was added. The reaction mixtures were titrated against
0.01N KMnO4 till the end point was (light pink) reached. The catalase activity was
expressed as µmole H2O2 decomposed per 100mg fresh weight (FW) of tissue.
3.14.2 Peroxidase Enzyme Assay
Peroxidase activity was estimated by a modified method of Luck, (1963). 2.5%
protein extract was prepared. 2ml citrate phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 1ml H2O2 and 1ml p-
phenylenediamine were taken in two sets of test tubes; one was blank and the other was
labeled sample. In the sample, the protein extract was added and allowed to stand for 10
min. After 10 min 2ml 4N H2SO4 was added to stop the reaction. In the blank, 2ml 4N
H2SO4 was added and then 1ml enzyme extract was added. All the reaction mixtures
were allowed to stand for 1 hr at room temperature in the dark. After 1 hr A485 was
measured with the spectrophotometer. The enzyme activity was expressed as the
difference in OD between blank and sample per 100mg fresh weight (FW).
3.14.3 Superoxide Dismutase Enzyme (SOD) Assay
The activity of SOD was assayed by measuring the ability of the enzyme to
inhibit the photochemical reduction of nitro-blue tetrazolium (NBT). The assay was
conducted according to the method of Beauchamp and Fridovich, (1971). The reaction
mixture contained 50 mM potassium buffer (pH 7.8), 10 mM methionine, 1.17 mM
riboflavin and 56 mM NBT and the enzyme extract. The final volume of the reaction mix
was made up to 3.0 ml. Riboflavin was added in the last. The reaction mixture was
incubated in light. The blanks (without enzyme) were not illuminated, and incubated in
dark. The reaction was allowed to take place for 30 min. After the reaction was complete
the absorbance of the reaction mixtures was measured at 560 nm. One unit of SOD
represents the amount of enzyme that inhibits the NBT reduction by 50%.
3.15 Proline Estimation
Extraction and determination of proline was performed according to the method
of Bates et al., (1973). 500 mg plant tissue was homogenized in 5 ml of 3%
sulphosalicylic acid. Extracts (2 ml) were held for 1h in boiling water by adding 2 ml
ninhydrin regent(1.25 g ninhydrin + 30 ml glacial acetic acid + 20 ml 6 M phosphoric
acid) and 2 ml glacial acetic acid, after which cold toluene (4ml) was added. Absorbance
of supernatant was read at 520 nm using double beam UV-VIS spectrophotometer
UV5704SS and calculated as μmol/g fresh weight (FW) against standard proline.
3.16 Malondialdehyde (MDA) Content Estimation/Lipid Peroxidation
75
The level of lipid peroxidation in plant tissue was measured by the method of
Heath and Packer, (1968) in terms of malondialdehyde content, a product of lipid
peroxidation determined by the thiobarbituric acid reaction. Fresh control and treated leaf
tissue (0.3 g) were homogenized in 3 ml of 20% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The
homogenate was centrifuged at 3,500 rpm for 20 min. To 1 ml of aliquot of the
supernatant, 1 ml of 20% TCA containing 0.5 % (w/v) TBA was added. The mixture was
heated at 950C for 30 min and then quickly cooled in ice bath. The contents were
centrifuged at 10,000 X g for 15 min and the absorbance was measured at 532 nm using
double beam UV-VIS spectrophotometer UV5704SS. Value for non–specific absorbance
at 600 nm was subtracted. The concentration of MDA was calculated using an extinction
coefficient of 155 mM-1
cm-1
and expressed as nmol/g fresh weight (FW) tissue.
3.17 Pigment Estimation
Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids were estimated.
The pigment estimation was performed as described by Arnon, (1949). The seedling
leaves were homogenized in chilled acetone. 100 mg leaf tissue was ground in 10 ml of
80% acetone (1:10 w/v). The homogenate was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 mins.
After centrifugation the supernatant was collected and the absorbance was read at 645,
652, 663 nm for chlorophyll; and 480, 510 nm for carotenoid estimations using double
beam UV-VIS spectrophotometer UV5704SS. The amount of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll
b, total chlorophyll, carotenoid, and was calculated according to the following formulae.
The amount of each of these was expressed in mg/g fresh weight (FW).
Chl a = [12.7(A663) - 2.69(A645)] x V x 1
1000 Wt
Chl b = [22.9 (A645) - 4.68(A663)] x V x 1
1000 Wt
Chltotal = A652 x V
34.5 Wt
Carotenoids = 7.6(A480) - 1.49(A510) x V x 1
1000 Wt
V = volume, Wt = weight in g
76
3.18 Statistical Analysis
The data were maintained in minimum three replicates and data recorded from all
the screening methods was subjected to statistical analysis. Groups were compared by
either one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or two-way ANOVA and the significance
of mean difference of control group with other treatment groups was done by LSD test.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed by statistical software SPSS
ver.19.0 whereas two-way ANOVA was calculated by Graph Pad Prism (version 5.0).
Mean:
It was calculated by following formula:
X = ΣX/N
Standard Deviation (SD) (σ):
It was calculated by squaring the deviation of each observation from the mean,
adding the squares, dividing by a number of observations and extracting the square root
by using the following formula:
2
2( fd)
fd -NS.D.(σ)=
N-1
Where:
f= frequency
d=deviation
∑= sign of su mMation
N= number of observations.
Standard Error:
It is a measure of the mean differences between the sample estimate of mean and
the population parameter i.e. it is the measure of uncontrolled variation present in a
sample. It is estimated by dividing the estimate of standard deviation by the square root
of the number of observation in the sample. Thus,
SE = SD/
Percent of Control:
To calculate the percent control value following formula was applied.
Value in treatmentPercent of control = 100Value in control
77
Assessment of Variability:
The structure for analysis of variance (ANOVA), which was used for the
experiments laid out in random block design is given below.
Source of variation Degree of
freedom
Sum of squares Means sum of
squares
F ratio
Replication r-1 S S/r-1=v V/w
Treatment t-1 P P/t-1=u U/w
Error (t-1)(r-1) Q q/(t-1)(r-1) = w
Where:
t = Number of treatments
S = Sum of square due to replications
P = Sum of square due to treatments
q = Sum of square due to error
F = Variance ratio
v=Mean sum of squares due to replication
u = Mean sum of square due to treatments
w = Error mean squar
78
4.0 Results
Weed control is the primary yield limiting factor in pulse production, which
impacts essentially every acre in commercial production worldwide. Cost effective,
efficient, environmentally friendly weed control methods are essential to sustainable
pulse production. During present study black gram genotypes have been screened for
tolerance to glyphosate herbicide at practical application levels. These genotypes were
screened via in vitro selection and did not involve transgenic approaches. This study
offers the possibility of creating non-transgenic, glyphosate tolerant black gram cultivars
and eliminating market resistance and perception issues against transgenic crops. This
selective method will lead to enhanced profitability and likewise promoting economic
and environmental sustainability in black gram farms.
The present study was performed to investigate the in vitro methods that can be
used for screening of herbicide tolerant genotypes in Vigna mungo. There is lot of
literature on screening of stress tolerant plants in various crops using in vitro methods (in
vitro selection) but unfortunately there is no any report to the best of our knowledge on
screening of herbicide tolerant plants/genotypes in black gram which is one of the most
valuable pulse crop in India. The study was performed, keeping in view that post
emergent herbicides are generally used only to eradicate weeds in the crop fields
including pulses but broad spectrum herbicides like glyphosate can not distinguish
between weeds and desired crops so they cause harm to the latter. If we can screen the
tolerant cultivars which may occur naturally in environment we can use post emergent
herbicides for weed eradication during standing crop season.
In the present study we investigated the response of Vigna mungo genotypes
using petri dish bioassay or petri dish germination test at varying level of glyphosate
concentration and studied effect of different concentration of glyphosate herbicide on
morphological parameters like germination percentage, survival percentage, root length,
shoot length, seedling fresh weight and dry weight. Under in vitro studies we first
screened genotypes by in vitro germination on MS basal media supplemented with
different concentration of glyphosate herbicide and also by inoculating various seedling
explants (grown in MS basal free from herbicide) into selective herbicide media. For
further confirmation of tolerance we chose indirect (gradual treatment) and direct (shock
treatment) methods. In in vitro germination method screening was done by observing
effect of glyphosate herbicide on the above mentioned morphological parameters.
79
Activity of antioxidants like catalase, peroxidase superoxide dismutase, proline content,
lipid peroxidation and total protein content was also investigated. Impact of herbicide on
morphogenic response, percent callus response, number of shoots and roots and length of
shoots and roots were also studied in all genotypes used in study. The isopropylamine
salt of glyphosate, RoundUp (Monsanto, USA), was used in all the experiments. The
molecular weight of glyphosate mono-isopropylammonium is 228.2 and it is supplied as
a 41% solution. For petridish screening procedure seeds were soaked for 24 hrs in
increasing glyphosate concentrations, after thorough washing the seeds were allowed to
germinate in petridishes. For in vitro germination screening procedure sterilized seeds
were inoculated in test tubes. After germination the data on various morphological and
biochemical parameters were taken and anlaysed. For indirect (gradual treatment) and
direct (shock treatment) various explants obtained from in vitro grown seedlings are
inoculated in MS media supplemented with various growth hormone and varying
glyphosate concentrations. The conclusions drawn from these experiments have been
detailed and discussed in the present chapter.
4.1 Petridish Germination Test
The morphological parameters like seed germination and survival percentages,
seedling root length and seedling fresh weight and dry weight of germinated seedlings
were measured after the treatments.
4.1.1 Germination Percentage
Mean values for germination percentage (GP) of six black gram genotypes
differed significantly after herbicide stress induced by glyphosate treatment. Treatment
with glyphosate led to a decrease in germination percentage in all the varieties (Plate-1).
In control maximum germination was in PU-19 (100.00±0.00%) and minimum in PU-31
and Azad-2 (91.11±2.22%). Glyphosate caused maximum percent decrease over control
in germination percentage at 10 mM of PU-35 and Azad-2 where germination was
reduced up to 92.68% while minimum percent inhibition over control was found in
Azad-1(86.36%). Among treatment there was no significant difference on lower doses 1
mM and 2 mM but showed significant (P<0.05) reduction in GP at higher doses (4, 6, 8
and 10 mM). The glyphosate concentration which led to about 50% inhibition over
control in germination was different for all the six genotypes. It was 8 mM for PU-19
(46.88%) and PU-35(51.56%), and 6 mM for IPU-94-1, PU-31, Azad-1 and Azad-2
(43.18, 43.90, 47.73 and 56.10% respectively) (Table-4.1, Figure-4.1A). Two way
80
anova showed a highly significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor
2) as well as interaction between two factors. Factor 1-F 5,84=8.713,p<0.0001; Factor 2-
F6,84=461.3,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F30,84=3.187, p<0.0001(Appendix Table -1).
4.1.2 Survival Percentage
The seedling survival showed a marked difference in all the six genotypes. The
percentage survival of seedlings at the highest glyphosate concentration (10 mM) was
8.89±2.22 in PU-19, 4.44±2.22 in PU-35, 6.67±3.85 in IPU-94-1 and 6.67±0.00 Azad-1
whereas it was only 2.22±2.22 in Azad-2 and PU-31. The percentage survival showed a
gradual decrease with increasing glyphosate concentrations in all the six genotypes
(Table-4.2, Figure-4.1B). In PU-19 maximum survival was in control (88.89±4.44) and
minimum at 10 mM (8.89±2.22) with percent reduction of 90.00 %. In PU-35, maximum
survival was in control (80.00±0.00) and minimum at 10 mM (4.44±2.22) with percent
reduction of 94.44 %. In IPU-94-1 percent reduction of 91.89 % was obtained between
maximum survival in control and minimum at 10 mM. %. In PU-31, Azad-1 and Azad-2
percent reduction of 97.06 %, 91.43% and 96.88% was obtained between maximum
survival in control and minimum at 10 mM. The glyphosate concentration which led to
50% or reduced survival was different for all the six genotypes. It was 6 mM (52.50%)
for PU-19, 4 mM (41.67%, 48.65%) for PU-35 and IPU-94-1, 6 mM (58.82%, 45.71%)
for PU-31 and Azad-1 and 4 mM (53.13%) for Azad-2 but percent reduction with respect
to control in survival percentage at 10 mM was PU-19 (90.00), PU-35 (94.44), IPU-94-
1(91.89), PU-31(97.06), Azad-1(91.43) and Azad-2(96.88). Two way anova revealed a
significant effect of genotype (factor -1) and concentration (factor -2) but not of
interaction between two factors (genotype and concentration).Factor 1-F
5,84=9.741,p<0.0001; Factor 2- F6,84=215.1,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F30,84=1.114, p<0.34
(Appendix Table-2).
4.1.3 Seedling Root Length
This parameter is most sensitive for herbicide among all the parameters studied
showing significant (P<0.05) reduction in root length at 2 mM in all the genotypes
except Azad-2 (Table-4.3). With increasing concentration there was progressive decline
in root length in all the genotypes (Plate-1C). Highest root length was observed in
control and seedling root length in various genotypes was: PU-19(6.06±0.27cm), PU-35
(5.77±0.22cm), IPU-94-1(5.87±0.18cm), PU-31(5.90±0.21cm), Azad-1(5.83±0.09cm)
and Azad-2(4.80±0.12cm) and at 10 mM PU-19 and Azad-2 had highest and lowest root
81
length (0.49±0.03 and 0.23±0.12cm) respectively. 1 mM concentration did not show
significant difference on root length but concentration greater than it caused significant
reduction in root length in all genotypes. In concentrations higher than 2 mM roots were
stunted and there was decrease in root hair. Percent reduction with respect to control of
root length increased with increase in glyphosate concentration in all the genotypes.
Percent reduction (%) with respect to control in highest dose 10 mM was PU-19 (91.96),
PU-35 (93.87), IPU-94-1 (90.91), PU-31 (94.58), Azad-1 (91.77) and Azad-2 (95.21)
(Figure- 4.2A). This clearly indicates the relative tolerance among genotypes and we can
conclude that the genotypes with less inhibition at highest glyphosate concentration (10
mM) can better tolerate the herbicide stress. Two way anova for root length showed
significant difference of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as
interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F 5,84=2.583,p<0.318; Factor
2- F6,84=789.3,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F30,84=3.325, p<0.0001 (Appendix Table -3).
4.1.4 Seedling Fresh Weight
Glyphosate treatment reduces fresh weight of plants. A reduction in fresh weight
of seedlings was also observed during present study. Significant (P<0.05) differences
was observed in seedling fresh weight between herbicide concentration and genotypes
(Table-4.4). The fresh weight of germinated seedlings of V. mungo genotypes was taken
and it was found to decrease after treatment in all the six genotypes. The fresh weight (g)
of control seedlings was PU-19(1.15±0.18), PU-35 (0.91±0.03), IPU-94-1(1.23±0.09),
PU-31(0.85±0.03), Azad-1(0.95±0.03) and Azad-2(0.83±0.02). At the highest glyphosate
concentration fresh weight was 0.28±0.04 in PU-19, 0.30±0.03 in PU-35, 0.33±0.01 in
IPU-94-1, 0.23±0.02 in PU-31, 0.30±0.03 in Azad-1 and 0.24±0.02 in Azad-2 (Figure -
4.3A). The statistical comparison of the six varieties by LSD test showed that decrease in
fresh weight was significant for the treatments but not genotypes. Maximum and
minimum reduction of fresh weight at 10 mM was observed in PU-31(73.44%) and PU-
35 (66.91%). Two way anova for fresh weight of seedlings showed extremely significant
difference of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as interaction
between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F 5,84=35.55,p<0.0001; Factor 2-
F6,84=418.2,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F30,84=5.125, p<0.0001(Appendix Table -4).
4.1.5 Seedling Dry Weight
Glyphosate also caused reduction in dry weight of seedlings in all genotypes.
Significant (P<0.05) differences were observed in seedling dry weight between herbicide
concentration and genotypes (Table-4.5). The dry weight of germinated seedlings of V.
82
mungo genotypes was taken and it was found to decrease after the treatment in all the six
genotypes. The dry weight (g) of control seedlings was PU-19(0.33±0.02), PU-35
(0.27±0.02), IPU-94-1(0.28±0.01), PU-31(0.27±0), Azad-1(0.25±0.02) and Azad-
2(0.20±0.01). At the highest glyphosate concentration dry weight was 0.06±0.02 in PU-
19, 0.06±0.01 in PU-35, 0.05±0 in IPU-94-1, 0.02±0.03 in PU-31, 0.04±0 in Azad-1 and
0.03±0.02 in Azad-2. Significant differences in dry weight were observed for the
treatments in all the genotypes. Maximum and minimum reduction of dry weight at 10
mM was observed in PU-31(90.24%) and PU-35 (75.61%). Dose dependent decrease
was observed in dry weight on increasing glyphosate concentration in all varieties
(Figure-4.3B). Two way anova for dry weight of seedlings showed extremely significant
difference of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as interaction
between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F 5,84=11.13,p<0.0001; Factor 2-
F6,84=257.3, p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F30,84=2.823, p<0.0001 (Appendix Table -5).
4.1.6 Vigour Index
Vigour index of seedlings decreased with increasing concentration of herbicide in
all the treatments and genotypes. The maximum vigour index (PU-19, 1217), (PU-35,
906), (IPU-94-1, 1284), (PU-31, 964), (Azad-1, 1232) and (Azad-2, 1184) was observed
at control at 10th
day of treatment (DAT). The minimum vigour index (PU-19, 12), (PU-
35, 4), (IPU-94-1, 9), (PU-31, 3), (Azad-1, 10) and (Azad-2, 5) was observed in 10 mM
concentration (Table 4.6).
4.1.7 Tolerance Index
The maximum tolerance index was observed in PU-19 (0.88), PU-35 (0.63), IPU-
94-1 (0.74), PU-31, (0.72), Azad-1 (0.80) and Azad-2, (0.77) while minimum tolerance
index was observed in 10 mM (PU-19, 0.88), (PU-35, 0.63), (IPU-94-1, 0.74), (PU-31,
0.72), (Azad-1, 0.80) and (Azad-2, 0.77). Tolerance index decreased with increasing
concentration of glyphosate (Table 4.6, Figure 4.2B).
4.1.8 Percentage of Phytotoxicity
The maximum percentage of phytotoxicity was observed in 10 mM (PU-19,
91.85), (PU-35, 93.99), (IPU-94-1, 90.91), (PU-31, 94.35), (Azad-1, 91.83) and (Azad-2,
95.54) while minimum percentage of phytotoxicity was observed in 1 mM (PU-19,
12.48), (PU-35, 37.57), (IPU-94-1, 25.57), (PU-31, 28.25), (Azad-1, 19.43) and (Azad-2,
23.57). Percentage of phtotoxicity increased with increasing concentration of glyphosate
(Table 4.6).
83
4.2 In Vitro Germination Test
In the second step of screening of herbicide tolerant genotypes seeds were grown
in basal MS media supplemented with various concentrations of glyphosate in test tubes.
During in vitro germination studies chosen concentrations were much lower than
petridish screening depending upon the response of in vitro grown seeds and seedlings.
Since screening of herbicide tolerant genotypes under field conditions requires large
investment and involves interactions of other environmental factors making the study
difficult, in vitro screening is an alternative approach which is more convenient, efficient
and takes less time and space for screening large number of genotypes for herbicide
tolerance. During in vitro germination screening, effect of glyphosate on growth
parameters like germination percentage, survival percentage, root length, shoot length
and fresh weight were studied. Effect of glyphosate on activity of antioxidative enzymes
like catalase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and other biochemical parameters like
total proline and total protein were also analysed.
4.2.1 Germination Percentage
Herbicide had profound effect on seed germination and seedling growth.
Genotypes showed significant variation for seed germination. Effect of herbicide also
showed significant change in seed germination (Table-4.7). Highest percentage of seed
germination at control was observed in PU-19 (96.67±1.67) and minimum was in PU-31
and PU-35 (86.67±3.33). Percentage of decrease in seed germination with respect to
control at highest glyphosate concentration was highest in PU-31 (75.00%) and lowest in
PU-19 (51.72%). Concentrations higher than 0.4 mM cause significant reduction in
germination percentage except Azad-1 and IPU-94-1. EC50 (glyphosate concentration
which led to 50% or reduced germination) for germination percentage was different in
different genotypes. It was 0.8 mM for PU-19, IPU-94-1 and Azad-1, 0.4 mM for PU-35
and PU-31and 6 mM for Azad-2 (Plate-2, 3; Figure-4.4A). \
Two way anova for germination percentage of seedlings showed extremely
significant difference of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as
interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F 5,72=23.60,p<0.0001; Factor
2- F5,72=251.8,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F25,72=4.141, p<0.0001 (Appendix Table-6).
4.2.2 Survival Percentage
Glyphosate also reduced survival percentage of in vitro grown seedlings in all the
genotypes studied. It was decreased gradually in a dose dependent manner. Significant
variation was observed in survival percentage among genotypes and significant reduction
84
was shown in all concentrations. Highest percentage of seedling survival at control was
observed in PU-19 (85.00±2.89) and minimum was in PU-31 and PU-35 (80.00±2.89).
Percentage of decrease in survival percentage with respect to control at highest
glyphosate concentration 0.8 mM was maximum in PU-31(79.17%) and lowest in PU-19
(64.71%). Significant reduction in survival percentage was observed in 0.4 mM and
onwards (Table-4.8, Figure-4.4B).
Two way anova for survival percentage of in vitro grown seedlings showed
significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as interaction
between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F5,72=10.88,p<0.0001; Factor 2-
F5,72=243.6,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F25,72=1.750, p<0.0346 (Appendix Table-7).
4.2.3 Root Length
Root length was drastically reduced by all concentrations of herbicide in all the
genotypes studied. As compared to petridish germination method, in vitro germination in
MS media supplemented with herbicide showed clear relative tolerance among
genotypes for the herbicide glyphosate and it can be used as a better method of screening
for herbicide tolerance among various cultivars growing naturally. With increasing
concentration there was gradual reduction in root length in all the genotypes (Plate-2, 3).
Highest root length was observed in control and seedling root length in various
genotypes was: PU-19 (9.93±0.28cm), PU-35 (9.00±0.29cm), IPU-94-1(8.50±0.58cm),
PU-31(8.07±0.30cm), Azad-1(6.80±0.78cm) and Azad-2(6.63±0.32cm) and at 0.8 mM
PU-19 and IPU-94-1 had highest (1.20±0.21, 1.13±0.32cm) and lowest root length was
in PU-31 (0.53±0.03cm) respectively (Table-4.9, Figure-4.5B). All the concentration
caused significant difference/reduction in root length in all genotypes. In concentrations
higher than 0.4 mM roots were stunted, proximal ends of roots were swollen and there
was reduction in number of root hair. Percent reduction with respect to control of root
length increased with increase in glyphosate concentration in all the genotypes. Percent
reduction with respect to control in highest dose 0.8 mM was PU-19 (87.92), PU-35
(89.26), IPU-94-1(86.67), PU-31(93.39), Azad-1(88.73) and Azad-2 (89.45). This clearly
shows that the genotypes with less inhibition at highest glyphosate concentration (0.8
mM) can better tolerate the herbicide stress. The F-ratio (5, 12 DF) was found to be
statistically significant at 1% (i.e. p < 0.01) for all treatments of glyphosate in all the
genotypes.
Two way anova for root length of in vitro grown seedlings showed significant
effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as interaction between
85
genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F5,72=32.28,p<0.0001; Factor 2-
F5,72=544.6,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F25,72=5.544, p<0.0001(Appendix Table-8).
4.2.4 Shoot Length
Effect of glyphosate herbicide on shoot length of six genotypes of Vigna mungo
was also studied in in vitro grown seedlings after 15 days of inoculation and it was
observed that glyphosate caused inhibition in shoot length but the effect was lesss
prominent as compared to that on root length. According to Table 4.10 maximum shoot
length was observed in control and minimum at 0.8 mM. In control, among genotypes
shoot length was highest in PU-35 (18.83±0.73cm) and lowest in Azad-1(11.00±0.58cm)
and at highest herbicide dose it was maximum in PU-19 (3.37±0.59cm) while minimum
in Azad-2 (1.77±0.26cm) (Figure-4.5A). Maximum percent decrease over control was
found in Azad-2, PU-31 (87.07, 84.81) and minimum in PU-19 and Azad-1(76.24,
76.67). The F-ratio (5, 12 DF) was found to be statistically significant at 1% (i.e. p <
0.01) for all treatments of glyphosate in all the genotypes.
Two way anova for shoot length of in vitro grown seedlings showed extremely
significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as interaction
between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F5,72=18.74,p<0.0001; Factor 2-
F5,72=485.5,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F25,72=5.864, p<0.0001 (Appendix Table-9).
4.2.5 Fresh Weight of Seedlings
A reduction in fresh weight was also observed in in vitro germination test like
petridish germination test in our investigations. The fresh weight of germinated V.
mungo seedlings was taken after 15 days of inculation and it was found to decrease after
the treatment. The fresh weight (g) of control seedlings was 2.85±0.15 in PU-19,
2.80±0.10 in PU-35, 3.42±0.22 in IPU-94-1, 2.70±0.13 in PU-31, 2.91±0.08 in Azad-1
and 2.76±0.20 in Azad-2. It showed a gradual decrease with increasing glyphosate
concentration in all genotypes. At the highest glyphosate concentration 0.8 mM
maximum value was obtained in Azad-2 while minimum value was obtained in PU-31
but maximum percent decrease over control at 0.8 mM was found in Azad-1 (Table-4.11
Figure-4.6). The F-ratio (5, 12 DF) was found to be statistically significant at 1% (i.e. p
< 0.01) for all treatments of glyphosate in all the genotypes.
Two way anova for fresh weight of in vitro grown seedlings also showed
significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as interaction
between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F5,72=4.09,p<0.0025; Factor 2-
F5,72=328.6,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F25,72=2.376, p<0.0023 (Appendix Table-10).
86
4.2.6 Catalase Activity
The catalase activity in V. mungo seedlings was measured as the amount of H2O2
decomposed per gram fresh weight (µmole H2O2 decomposed/100mg FW). Amongst the
controls, catalase activity was lowest, 91.67±4.41 µmole H2O2 decomposed/100 mg FW,
in the seedlings of PU-35 and highest, 200.0±30.55 in Azad-1. The catalase activity was
clearly found to increase after glyphosate treatment in all the six genotypes (Figure-
4.7A). At the highest dose 0.8 mM glyphosate dose, the maximum activity was
773.33±40 µmole H2O2 decomposed/100mg FW in PU-19 while minimum activity was
in 446.67±35.13 µmole H2O2 decomposed/100mg FW (Table-4.12). Percent increase
over control at 0.8 mM was highest in PU-19 (728.57%) while lowest in PU-31
(179.17%). According to LSD test, the increase in activity across the treatments was
significant in the six genotypes. It was assumed that to overcome the oxidative stress
caused by glyphosate, catalases might be playing a pivotal role in Vigna mungo
genotypes. The protective role of catalase in PU-31 and Azad-1 was not sufficient
enough to protect the plants from herbicide injury as shown by survival percentage and
seedling root length in PU-19. The induced catalase activity in PU-19 and IPU-94-1
might be playing a supportive role causing less damaging symptoms at higher doses.
The F-ratio (5, 12 DF) was found to be statistically significant at 1% (i.e. p < 0.01) for all
treatments of glyphosate in all the genotypes.
Two way anova for catalase activity of in vitro grown seedlings showed
extremely significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as
interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F5,72=33.68,p<0.0001; Factor
2- F5,72=183.4,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F25,72=3.115, p<0.0001 (Appendix Table-11).
4.2.7 Peroxidase Activity
The peroxidase activity in in vitro grown seedlings of six genotypes of V. mungo
was measured as the change in optical density (ΔOD/100mg FW). Peroxidase activity
was lowest in control seedlings. Among genotypes it was maximum in PU-19, 4.51±0.46
ΔOD/100mg FW, and minimum in PU-35, 3.51±0.55 ΔOD/100mg FW. Like catalase,
peroxidase activity was also found to increase after glyphosate treatment in all the six
genotypes (Figure-4.7B). The peroxidase activity was highest at 0.8 mM, it was highest,
10.44±0.28 ΔOD/100mg FW in IPU-94-1, and lowest, ΔOD/100mg FW in Azad-1. The
increase in peroxidase activities was found significant from 0.4 mM in all genotypes.
The percent increase over control in peroxidase activity was highest at 0.8 mM in PU-
19(76.48%), PU-35 (130.93%) and IPU-94-1(154.30%) but it was highest at 0.6 mM in
87
PU-31(10.99%), Azad-1 (70.53%) and Azad-2 (82.33%) (Table-4.13). The F-ratio (5, 12
DF) was found to be statistically significant at 5% (i.e. p < 0.05) and 1% (i.e. p < 0.01)
for all treatments of glyphosate in all the genotypes.
Two way anova for peroxidase activity of in vitro grown seedlings also showed
extremely significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as
interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F5,72=7.458,p<0.0001; Factor
2- F5,72=29.25,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F25,72=4.318, p<0.0001 (Appendix Table -12).
4.2.8 Superoxide Dismutase Activity
SODs are also known to play important role in herbicide tolerance in several
plant species. We also measured SOD activity in in vitro grown V. mungo seedlings after
glyphosate treatment. It was expressed as unit activity/100 mg FW. As compared to other
oxidative enzymes SOD activity was not significantly increased after glyphosate
exposure. From control to 0.6 mM it was increased but after that it decreased except in
PU-19, Azad-1 and Azad-2 where it was increased. SOD activity in the controls was
maximum, 13.86±0.84 in PU-19 while minimum, 11.15±1.01 in Azad-1 (Table-4.14,
Figure-4.8A). The SOD activity at 0.8 mM was highest 30.48±2.32 in PU-19 and lowest
(11.07±1.03) in PU-35. The data indicates that the SOD activity is genotype-dependent.
The increase in SOD activity also suggests that glyphosate is inducing oxidative stress in
V. mungo.
Two way anova for SOD activity of in vitro grown seedlings also showed
extremely significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as
interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F5,72=38.54,p<0.0001; Factor
2- F5,72=21.83,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F25,72=5.268, p<0.0001 (Appendix Table -13).
4.2.9 Protein Content
Biotic or abiotic stress at the germination phase causes a decrease in normal
metabolic activities and consequent, reduction of growth. In this phase protein synthesis,
anabolic process like photosynthesis and transport of metabolites is badly affected. As
glyphosate inhibits amino acid metabolism by inhibiting shikimic acid pathway it also
showed profound effect on soluble protein content. Glyphosate caused decrease in
protein content of in vitro grown seedlings in all the treatment and in all the genotypes.
Maximum protein content was in control and value was highest for Azad-1 (10.17±0.54
mg/g fw), followed by IPU-94-1 (10.08±0.05 mg/g fw) and PU-35 (9.07±0.22 mg/g fw)
while lowest for Azad-2 (8.17±0.41 mg/g fw) (Table 4.15, Figure 4.8B). Significant
88
reduction was observed in all treatments. Maximum percent reduction over control at 0.8
mM was in Azad-2 (50.61%) while minimum in IPU-94-1 (31.52%).
Two way anova calculated for protein content of in vitro grown seedlings also
showed extremely significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as
well as interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F5,72=6.960,p<0.0001;
Factor 2- F5,72=48.98,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F25,72=2.571, p<0.0001 (Appendix Table -
14).
4.2.10 Proline Content
We analyzed impact of abiotic herbicide stress on proline content and found that
there was highly significant difference for proline content for the treatment and
genotype. In control seedlings proline content was lowest and among genotypes
maximum in PU-31 (0.17±0.02 μmol/g FW) and minimum in Azad-1 (0.14±0.02 μmol /g
FW). It was found to increase at all the doses and all the genotypes except Azad-2 at 0.1
mM where it was slightly decreased. 0.4 mM glyphosate in media showed significant
increase in all varieties (Table-4.16, Figure-4.9). At the highest concentration maximum
percent increase over control was found in Azad-1 (552.38%) following PU-19
(453.33%) and IPU-94-1 (369.05%) while minimum percent increase over control was in
PU-35 (206.38%) and Azad-2 (271.43%).
Two way anova calculated for protein content of in vitro grown seedlings also
showed extremely significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as
well as interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F5,72=7.741,p<0.0001;
Factor 2- F5,72=121.5,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F25,72=2.362, p<0.0001 (Appendix Table -
15).
89
4.3 In vitro Culture Screening
Tissue culture study was performed in order to understand the response of
seedling explants of genotypes in different concentrations and combination of auxin and
cytokinin for nonselective (control) and selective media and to screen herbicide tolerant
black gram genotypes. The explants viz; hypocotyl, epicotyl, cotyledonary node, shoot
apex and leaf segments obtained from one week old seedlings of control seeds on basal-
MS medium were used for the experiments. These explants were grown in MS medium
with different concentration of glyphosate supplemented with different concentrations of
NAA, BAP, and Kn. The explants showed different type of response, some without
intermediate phase (direct organogenesis from explants leading to plantlet, shoot and
root etc.) and other with intermediate phase (indirect organogenesis by callus and bud).
Among various concentrations and combinations of phytohormones best media was
selected for callus formation (callusing), shoot formation (shooting), root formation
(rooting). After that morphogenic response of various explants of six genotypes were
evaluated on the basis of percentage of explants forming callus, shoots and root, root
length, shoot length and callus fresh weight under stress (selective) media and the
genotypes were categorized in tolerant, moderately tolerant and susceptible.
4.3.1 Media Tested for Callus Formation
Various combinations of auxins were tested for callus formation in V. mungo.
Usually all explants showed callusing in all combinations formation varies according to
explant and genotype (Table-4.17). Among them best two media (A) and (C) were
selected to study response of six genotypes to herbicide stress in terms of percent callus
response (percent of response that responds for callusing) and callus fresh weight.
4.3.1.1 NAA-0.5 +BAP-1.0 mg/l- (A)
The combination containing NAA and BAP in the proportion 0.5:1.0 mg/l was
responsible for positive callusing responses in all the seedling explants for control as
well as for herbicide treated cultures (Table-4.18). Cotyledonary node was most superior
for callus induction followed by hypocotyl, epicotyl and shoot apex. The overall % of
response after 30 days ranged from 100% to 5% (Table- 4.19).
4.3.1.1.1 Epicotyl as Source of Explants
The epicotyl initially produced creamish to light green callus. The callus formed
for 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 mM, while root and callus was observed for control and 0.01 mM.
Callus induction also depended upon method of inoculation. When explants were
inoculated in horizontal manner then at initial stage callusing observed only towards the
90
ends of explants later throughout the surface of explants (Plate-4 E) whereas in vertical
inoculation basal callusing was observed in which compact greenish brown colored
callus was formed (Plate-4 D).
Percent callus response and callus biomass showed dose dependent decrease in
herbicide treated media. Callusing was observed up to 0.05 mM in all genotypes but at
0.1 mM only Azad-1 showed very few callusing. At 0.2 mM explants did not show any
kind of response in this combination in any genotype.
In control maximum % callus response was observed in IPU-94-1 (100%) and
minimum in PU-35 (75%). At 0.05% all genotypes showed callusing but maximum %
callus response with 56.67% were observed in PU-19 followed by PU-35 (46.67%) while
minimum in PU-31 (25.00%) (Table-4.19).
Callus fresh weight taken after 30 days also decreased in dose dependent manner.
Maximum fresh weight in control was recorded in in Azad-2 (1.91±0.12g), minimum in
PU-35 (1.62±0.12g) whereas in 0.05 mM greatest fresh weight was in IPU-94-
1(0.89±0.14g) and minimum in PU-31 and PU-35 (0.54±0.09, 0.56±0.09 g).
4.3.1.1.2 Cotyledonary Explants as Source of Explants
These explants gave best response for callusing in this combination. Shooting
response was also seen for control and 0.01 mM in PU-19 and Azad-1 (Plate-5 E, F).
Merely, callus was produced for 0.05 mM, 0.1 mM from cotyledonary node explants
(Plate-5 G). In 0.2 mM callusing response was not observed in PU-31 and Azad-2. In
control maximum callus response was found in IPU-94-1 and minimum in Azad-2
(Figure-4.10 A). In 0.1 mM on the basis of percent callus response from highest to
lowest values genotypes could be arranged as IPU-94-1(18.33)>Azad-1(16.67)>PU-
19(15.00)> Azad-2(10.00)> PU-35(8.33)>PU-31(6.67).
Effect of herbicide on callus fresh weight (CFW) was less harsh on cotyledonary
node explants as compared to other explants. There was not great variation in CFW
among genotypes in control and lower doses but genotypic differences were observed in
higher doses (Figure-4.10 B). In control highest CFW was recorded in PU-19
(2.19±0.13g) and lowest in PU-31 (1.77±0.10g) whereas at 0.2 mM lowest CFW was
found in PU-35 (0.18±0.02g) and highest in IPU-94-1 (0.31±0.06g) (Table-4.20).
Reduction in callus fresh weight (RCFW) was also proved a good screening
parameter for assessment of tolerant genotypes in black gram. Percent reduction in callus
fresh weight in comparison of control increased in a dose dependent manner. At 0.4 mM
complete reduction observed as no callus formed even after 30 days in any genotypes.
91
Genotype PU-31 and Azad-2 showed 100% reduction in 0.2 mM whereas IPU-94-1
scored least reduction in CFW (85.51%) (Figure-4.10 C). Thus if we compare tolerance
of genotypes on the basis of percent callusing response of cotyledonary explant in
callusing media-C supplemented with PGR NAA-0.5mg/l + BAP 1.0mg/l IPU-94-1,
Azad-1 and PU-19 were more tolerant than PU-35, PU-31, Azad-2.
Two way anova for percent callus response and callus fresh weight of
cotyledonary explants of six genotypes in this combination showed highly significant
effect of herbicide treatment, genotype and their interaction (Table-4.21 and 4.22).
4.3.1.1.3 Hypocotyl as Source of Explants
Hypocotyl explants showed superior callusing than epicotyl and shoot apex in
this combination. Callus was initially soft creamish green or whitish green in control
while in treated media it became brownish green or black (Plate -4 A, B, C). Callusing
was observed up to 0.05 mM in all genotype but in 0.1 mM only Azad-1 and Azad-2
showed callusing while at 0.2 mM PU-19 and Azad-2 showed callusing at very less
extent. Percent callus response and callus growth were decreased with increase in
glyphosate concentration. In control genotype PU-35, IPU-94-1, PU-31 and Azad-1
showed higher callus response (90%) than PU-19 (80%) and Azad-2 (75%) where as at
0.05 mM Azad-2 showed maximum callus response (33.33%) followed by PU-19
(25.00%), IPU-94-1 (21.67%) but minimum callus response was found in PU-31 (10%).
At 0.1 mM more callusing was found in PU-19 (20%) than Azad-2 (15%) and Azad-
1(10%).
Callus fresh weight in hypocotyl explants were also found decreased in all the
concentrations of glyphosate. There was not great variation in CFW among genotypes at
0.05 mM but at 0.1 mM genotype PU-19 showed more CFW (0.33±0.06g) than Azad-
1(0.21±0.05g) and Azad-2 (0.10±0.02g) (Table-4.20). Thus it is evident effect of
herbicide on cultures of hypocotyl explants was not as prominent as on cotyledonary
cultures.
4.3.1.1.4 Shoot Apex as Source of Explants
As described earlier among the all explants shoot apex was most susceptible to
herbicide toxicity and did not responded well for callusing in control and herbicide
media. Moderate compact greenish brown or green callus formed at base and apex dried
and became dead (Plate-5A, C; Plate 7 A, B). PU-31 and Azad-1 showed highest
(63.33%) and lowest (40.00%) callus response respectively in control. In 0.05 mM PU-
19 showed maximum callus response (30.00%) and PU-31 and IPU-94-1 minimum
92
callus response (15%) (Table-4.19). As compared to other explants CFW was very less
in shoot apex. In control genotype with maximum CFW was IPU-94-1(1.08±0.11g) and
Minimum was in PU-19 (0.75±0.11g). In 0.05 mM highest CFW was again in IPU-94-1
(0.78±0.08g) and lowest in Azad-2 (0.33±0.11g) (Table-4.20).
4.3.1.2 NAA-1.5+BAP-1.0 mg/l- (C)
Callus media-C with PGR combination of NAA and BAP in the proportion
1.5:1.0 mg/l also showed good callusing responses in all the seedling explants like leaf
segments, cotyledonary node and hypocotyl (Table-4.23). Nature, color and site of
callus initiation varied according to explants. In leaf segments callus initiated at cut ends
of leaf and it was green compact and nodular (Plate-6 G). In cotyledonary node callus
started at nodal portion as compact light brown callus while hypocotyl explants showed
initiation at either basal end (when inoculated vertically) or at both ends (when
inoculated horizontally) as greenish white or creamish white callus (Plate-6-C).
4.3.1.2.1 Leaf Segments as Source of Explants
Leaf explants showed moderate callusing in all genotypes but callus growth and
percent callusing response decreased with the increasing glyphosate concentration. In
few genotypes like Azad-2 and PU-19 compact greenish white callus was formed while
in IPU -94-1 and PU-35 greenish friable callus was observed which was initiated at cut
ends and later extended to midrib regions (Plate-6 G, H). Response was observed up to
0.05 mM in all genotypes but in 0.1 mM explants of PU-31 and PU-19 did not form
callus. In 0.2 mM only Azad-1 showed very less callusing (Plate-6 B) while in 0.4 mM
callus was not formed at all in genotype.
4.3.1.2.2 Cotyledonary Node as Source of Explants
In callus media–(C) cotyledonary node explants was found to be superior for
callusing than other explants (Table-4.23). Callus was formed up to 0.2 mM in all the
genotypes but in 0.4 mM very less callusing was observed only in IPU-94-1 (Plate-6F).
Percentage of explants that responded for callusing decreased with the increasing
concentration. In control maximum percent callus response was found in IPU-94-1 and
Azad-1 (84.44) and minimum in PU-35 (75.55). At highest concentration on the basis of
percent callus response from highest to lowest values genotypes could be arranged as
PU-19(15.55)>IPU-94-1, Azad-1 (13.33)> PU-35 (11.11)> PU-31(8.89) >Azad-2(10.00)
PU-35(4.45) (Table-4.24, Figure-4.11 A).
Significant effect of herbicide on callus fresh weight (CFW) of cotyledonary
node cultures was also observed. Generally cotyledonary node cultures showed higher
93
CFW followed by hypocotyl and leaf cultures. There was variation in CFW among
genotypes in control and treated media. In control highest CFW was recorded in IPU-94-
1 (2.86±0.15g) and lowest in Azad-2 (2.06±0.14g) whereas at 0.2 mM lowest CFW was
found in IPU-94-1 (0.30±0.02g) and highest in Azad-1 (0.62±0.04g) (Table-4.25,
Figure-4.11 B). Percent reduction in callus fresh weight in comparison of control
increased in a dose dependent manner in all the genotypes. In 0.2 mM maximum
reduction was found in Azad-2 (94.28%) and minimum in PU-19 (80.56%). At 0.4 mM
only IPU-94-1 showed little callus with minimum 88.23% reduction while other
genotypes showed 100% reduction (Figure-4.11 C).
Two way anova for percent callus response and callus fresh weight of
cotyledonary explants of six genotypes in this combination showed highly significant
effect of herbicide treatment, genotype and their interaction (Table 4.26 and 4.27).
4.3.1.2.3 Hypocotyl as Source of Explants
Hypocotyl explants produced only callus and roots and shoots were not observed
in this combination (Table-4.23). Callus induction and callus growth was better in
hypocotyl cultures than leaf segments and shoot apex. Soft, friable, creamish green or
whitish green callus was formed in control while in treated media it became brownish
green (Plate-7 F, H). Callusing was observed up to 0.2 mM in all genotypes but in 0.4
mM no response was observed in any genotype. Percent callus response and callus
growth were decreased with increase in glyphosate concentration. In control genotype
PU-31 and IPU-94-1 showed highest percent callus response (70.00%) and minimum
response found in PU-35 (60.00) where as at 0.2 mM IPU-94-1 showed maximum callus
response (23.33%) followed by PU-19 and Azad-1 (8.33%) but minimum callus response
was found in Azad-2 (3.33%) (Table-4.24).
Callus fresh weight in hypocotyl explants were also reduced in all the
concentrations of glyphosate except in IPU-94-1 and Azad-2 where it was slightly
increased in 0.01 mM than control. At 0.2 mM genotype IPU-19 showed greatest CFW
(0.75±0.28g) and lowest in Azad-2 (0.21±0.07g) (Table-4.25).
94
4.3.2 Media Tested for Shoot Formation
Various combinations of auxin and cytokinin were tested for adventitious and
non adventitious shoot formation in black gram (Table-4.28). Among them best three
media-(D), media-(H) and media-(I) were selected to study response of six genotypes to
herbicide stress in terms of percentage of shoot response, shoot number and shoot length.
4.3.2.1 NAA-1.0+BAP-1.5+Kn-0.5 mg/l – (D)
Among the four seedling explants cotyledonary node and shoot apex were
showed better positive response for shoot formation than epicotyl and hypocotyl in
control as well as herbicide media in all the six genotypes (Table-4.29). Overall
percentage of shoot regeneration response after 30 days ranged from 83.33% to 6.67%
(Table-4.30).
4.3.2.1.1 Epicotyl as Source of Explants
In this combination, the epicotyl explant in control and stress media produced
only callus to varying degree depending on genotype. Shoot was not observed in any
treatment as well as genotype (Table-4.29). Creamish green callus started at basal end
of explant that later become brownish (Plate-9 G, H). Callus size and percent callus
response decreased with increasing herbicide dose.
4.3.2.1.2 Cotyledonary Node as Source of Explants
The cotyledonary node showed good shooting and callusing in control as well as
stress media. Cotyledonary node showed first callusing at basal end of explant while
multiple shoots as well as shoot buds proliferated from axillary buds. Initially compact
greenish brown callus formed but as shoot length increased callus become brown (Plate-
9B). There was progressive decline in percent shoot response, shoot number per explant
and shoot length as glyphosate concentration increased in all genotypes but response
varied with the genotype. At control and lower concentration of glyphosate i.e. 0.01 mM
and 0.05 mM usually all genotypes showed shooting. At higher glyphosate concentration
0.1 mM shooting was observed in PU-35, PU-31 and IPU -94-1 while only IPU-94-1
showed shooting at 0.2 mM (Table-4.29).
Maximum percent of response (percent regeneration of shoots) was found in
control and among genotypes it was highest in IPU-94-1(83.33) and lowest in Azad-
2(61.67) but at 0.05 mM highest response was recorded in Azad-1 (65.00) while lowest
at PU-35 (35.00) (Figure-4.12 A). Shoot number and length of shoots also decreased
with the increasing dose of herbicide. Highest number of shoots per explant was found in
control. Among genotypes it was highest in genotype IPU-94-1 (9.25±0.75) (Plate-8A)
95
while lowest in PU-19 (5.33±0.88) (Plate-9A) (Figure-4.12 B). At 0.05 mM
concentration of herbicide maximum number of shoots per explant was recorded in
Azad-2 while minimum in PU-31(2.75±0.48) and at the same herbicide concentration
longest shoots were recorded in Azad-1(2.13±0.20cm) and shortest in PU-
35(1.17±0.12cm) (Figure-4.12 C).
4.3.2.1.3 Hypocotyl as Source of Explants
Hypocotyl showed varied response in treatments and genotypes. It showed
usually callusing but shooting and shoot bud formation recorded only in control in
genotypes PU-35, PU-31 and Azad-2 (Plate-9F). Usually callus was formed at apical
portion of explant and it was soft friable, light yellowish green in color. Extent of callus
proliferation and callus growth was reduced with increasing concentration of herbicide.
At high concentrations 0.2 and 0.4 mM no any response was observed even after 45 days
of inoculation and explant become brown after some swelling (Table-4.29).
4.3.2.1.4 Shoot Apex as Source of Explants
The shoot apex explants in control and stress media in this combination produced
callusing as well as shoots. Shoots with callusing was observed usually in all genotypes.
Callusing occurred at basal cut end of explants while shoot and multiple shoots were
observed at apex having shoot apical meristem. Callus were light green to dark green and
compact, nodular in control while brownish green and compact in 0.2 mM. Shoots
without callus phase obtained for 0.05 mM and 0.1 mM in genotypes PU-19 and Azad-
1, while multiple shoots were noticed in control media by genotype IPU-94-1 and azad-2
as well as by PU-19 in 0.05 mM. Shoot number per explant as well as shoot length was
decreased in all genotypes with increasing concentration of herbicide. Maximum number
of shoots per explant was obtained in control, and order of maximum to minimum was
PU-19(4.33±0.67), PU-35(3.00±0.41), IPU-94-1 (4.5±0.65), PU-31(3.75±0.48), Azad-
1(3.75±0.48) and Azad-2 (2.25±0.95). At 0.05 mM maximum number of shoots was
found in PU-19 (2.93±0.33) and minimum in Azad-2. Maximum average shoot length
was observed in control for PU-31 (3.15±0.12cm) and minimum in PU-19
(1.40±0.17cm). In stress media of 0.05 mM greatest shoot length was found in azad-
1(1.54±0.23cm) lowest in PU-19 (0.87±0.20cm) (Table-4.30).
Among all the explants, cotyledonary explant were best and for this explant two
way ANOVA showed extremely significant effect of herbicide treatment, genotype and
their interaction for the percent shooting response, shoot number per explant and length
of shoots (Table-4.31, Appendix Table 16, 17, 18).
96
On the basis of percent shooting response of cotyledonary node explant in media-
D at 0.05 mM (in which all genotypes showed shooting response) the genotypes can be
grouped according to their relative tolerance as tolerant (Azad-1-65.00%, PU-19-
60.00%), moderately tolerant (IPU-94-1-48.33%, Azad-2-46.67%) and susceptible (PU-
31-40.00, PU-35-35.00%).
4.3.2.2 NAA-0.5+BAP-2.0+Kn-1.0 mg/l- (H)
In this combination hypocotyl, cotyledonary node and shoot apex showed good
response in control and stress media. Best shooting response was observed in
cotyledonary explant followed by shoot apex and hypocotyl. In hypocotyl first callus
were formed then shoot buds and shoots were initiated. In cotyledonary explant directly
shoots and shoot buds arised with callusing (Plate-10A). In shoot apex explants either
callusing starts at cut basal end and shoots at apical portion or only shoots formed at
apex (Table-4.30). Percentage of explants that showed shooting response ranged from
61.11% to 6.67% (Table -4.32).
4.3.2.2.1 Cotyledonary Node as Source of Explants
In media–(H), cotyledonary node showed good shoot formation, shoot bud
formation and callus formation in control and herbicide stress media (Plate-10). As
glyphosate concentration increases there was progressive reduction in % shoot response,
shoot number and shoot length in all genotypes but response varied with the genotype.
Shooting was observed in control as well as herbicide media of 0.01, 0.05 mM while at
0.1 mM response was not observed in PU-35 and PU-31. At 0.2 mM response was
observed only in PU-19 and Azad-1. No any response was observed at 0.4 mM in any
explant and genotype (Table-4.32).
As compared to media–(D) percent shooting response was comparatively less in
media–(H). Highest percent of response (percent shoot formation) was found in control
and it was highest in Azad-1 (61.11) and lowest in PU-31 (46.59). At lowest herbicide
dose 0.01 mM maximum response was recorded in PU-19 (51.66) and minimum at PU-
31 (33.33). At 0.05 mM highest percent response was again in PU-19 and minimum in
PU-35 and PU-31 (Table-4.33). At higher herbicide concentration 0.1 mM where all
genotypes showed positive response maximum value were found in Azad-1(27.77) while
minimum in PU-35 and PU-31(11.11) (Figure-4.13 A). Number of shoots per explant
and length of shoots are also decreased with the increasing dose of herbicide. In control
highest number of shoots per explant was recorded in Azad-1(6.00±0.58) followed by
PU-31, Azad-2(5.67±0.33), PU-19(5.33±0.33), PU-35(4.67±0.33), IPU-94-1(4.33±0.58)
97
(Plate-10 A, D). At highest stress level 0.4 mM highest number of shoots per explant
were recorded in Azad-1(2.33±0.33) followed by IPU-94-1, PU-19, Azad-2 (2.00±0.58),
PU-35 (1.00±0.58) (Figure-4.13 B). At 0.2 mM only PU-19 showed shoots with 14.44
% response, shoot number of 1.33±0.33 and shoot length of 0.93±0.12. Effect of
herbicide on shoot length was more severe than on shoot number. In control media
longest shoots (7.07±0.30cm) were observed in PU-19 while shortest in PU-
35(3.77±0.52cm). At 0.1 mM on the basis of shoot length from highest to lowest values
genotypes could be ranked as IPU-94-1(1.60±0.25cm)>Azad-1(1.30±0.06cm)>PU-
19(1.24±0.17cm)>PU-35(1.19±0.15cm)>Azad-2(1.17±0.12cm)>PU-31(1.03±0.26cm)
(Table-4.33, Figure-4.13 C).
ANOVA showed that in case of cotyledonary explant mean values in percent
shoot response, number of shoots per explant and average shoot length for both factors
(factor -1-genotype and factor-2- herbicide treatment) and their interaction were
significant (except interaction effect for percent response) (Table-4.34 and Appendix
Table-19, 20, 21).
4.3.2.2.2 Hypocotyl as Source of Explants
Unlike media–(D), media–(H) with combination of PGRs NAA-0.5+ BAP-2.0+
Kn-1.0 mg/l in which BAP and Kn amount was increased and NAA amount was
decreased hypocotyl explants showed good positive response for shooting in control as
well as herbicide treated media. Initially callus was induced and then shoots buds and
shoots were formed (Plate-11 E, Plate-12F, Plate-13G). However percent response was
less as compared to media –D but in this combination 0.01 mM also showed shooting
response. At 0.05 mM shoots were not formed except in Azad-1 with 15% response. At
0.01 mM maximum percent response was recorded in Azad-1(41.67%) while minimum
was found in PU-35 (31.11%) and PU-31(31.67%). Number of shoots per explant was
found decreased in this combination also. In control genotype genotype Azad-1 showed
best response with maximum number of shoots (3.33±0.33) while minimum numbers of
shoots were showed by PU-31(1.98±0.23). Similarly longest shoots at 0.01 mM were
showed by genotype Azad-1(2.28±0.45cm) and shortest were found in PU-19
(1.07±0.09cm) (Table-4.33).
4.3.2.2.3 Shoot apex as Source of Explants
Response of shoot apex explants was some what similar to media –D as shooting
response was observed at 0.05 mM in all genotypes. In 0.1 mM genotype PU-35 and
IPU-94-1 showed shoot response while in 0.2 mM only genotype IPU-94-1 showed
98
response. Explants formed shoots at apex and callus was initiated at cut basal end (Plate-
10 C; Plate-12 H, E; Plate-13 H, I). Percent response, number of shoots and shoot
length were decreased in dose dependent manner. In control maximum percent shoot
response was found in PU-35(48.89%) and minimum in IPU-94-1 and PU-31 (38.33%)
while at 0.1 mM PU-35(15.00) showed more response than in IPU-94-1(6.66). As
compared to cotyledonary node explant shoot number and shoot length were less in shoot
apex. Maximum number of shoots in control was showed by genotype PU-31(3.33±0.33)
and minimum were recorded in Azad-1(2.00±0.58). At 0.01 shoot length from maximum
to minimum in genotypes were PU-19(2.22±0.21cm)>IPU-94-1 (2.15±0.23cm)>Azad-
1(2.06±0.34cm)>Azad-2(1.56±0.12cm)>PU-31 (1.28±0.19cm)>PU-35 (1.21±0.08cm)
(Table- 4.33).
4.3.2.3 NAA-2.0+BAP-2.0+Kn-1.0 mg/l -(I)
In this combination of PGR only two explants cotyledonary and shoot apex
responded and genotypic variation in herbicide tolerance among six black gram
genotypes was observed. Both the explants showed multiple shoots, shoot buds and
shoots with callus in control and herbicide treated media but cotyledonary node were
found superior for callusing as well as shooting (Plate-14 A, G, H). Only in media–(I)
response was observed in 0.4 mM treated media in which all genotypes except Azad-1
and Azad-2. Percentage of explants that showed shooting response ranged from 76.67%
to 3.33% (Table-4.35 and 4.36).
4.3.2.3.1 Cotyledonary Node Explant as Source of Explants
Morphogenic response in cotyledonary node was similar to media–(D) and
media–(H). Shooting were observed in control and herbicide treated media but herbicide
showed adverse effect on shoot regeneration and callogenesis (Plate-14,15). Percent
shooting response decreased in concentration dependent manner. In control genotype
PU-35 showed maximum percent shooting response (76.67%) and genotype IPU-94-1
showed minimum response (60.00%) (Figure-4.14 A). At 0.1 mM where all genotypes
showed organogenesis highest and lowest response were observed in PU-19 and Azad-2
respectively.
Like other combination of media (D and H) number of shoots per explant
and length of shoots were decreased with increasing herbicide dose. In control maximum
number of shoots was found in PU-19 (9.00±0.58) and minimum in PU-35 and Azad-2
while in 0.1 mM maximum shoot number were again noticed in PU-19 (3.00±0.58) and
minimum in Azad-2 (Figure-4.14 A). Length of shoots was also reduced in this
99
combination of PGR with the increasing herbicide dose. At 0.2 mM longest shoots were
recorded in PU-19 (1.27±0.05cm) followed by IPU-94-1(1.10±0.26cm) and Azad-1
(0.97±0.03cm) while shortest shoots were formed in genotype PU-31 and Azad-2
(0.60±0.06cm) (Figure-4.14 C). At 0.2 mM on the basis of percent shooting response
from highest to lowest genotypes can be placed in order of PU-19 (26.67)>Azad-1,IPU-
94-1 (15.00)>PU-31, PU-35(10.00)>Azad-2(8.33). At highest dose of 0.4 mM PU-19,
IPU-94-1 and PU-35 showed shooting but to a very less extent (Table-4.35) Two way
ANOVA showed that in case of cotyledonary explant mean values in percent shoot
response, number of shoots per explant and average shoot length in media-(I) for both
factors (factor -1-genotype and factor-2- herbicide treatment) and their interaction were
significant (Table-4.37; Appendix Table- 22, 23, 24).
4.3.2.3.2 Shoot apex as Source of Explants
Percentage of explants that responded for shooting was low as compared to
cotyledonary node in control and herbicide treated media. Morphogenic response was
almost similar to other combinations of PGR but callus formed at base of explant was
more compact and brownish green in color. At apex green young shoots were
proliferated that not increased their length after 45 days and became chlorotic and dead.
In some genotypes only leaf like structure of moderate length formed at apex (Plate-14
I). In control media greatest percent response was recorded in Azad-2(46.67) followed
by PU19 (45.00), Azad-1, IPU-94-1(40.00) and lowest in PU-31(33.33). At 0.1 mM
genotype PU-19 showed highest regeneration response (35.00) followed by PU-35
(33.33), Azad-1(25.00) while genotype Azad-2 (10.00) (Table-4.36).
Shoot number per explant and shoot length consistently decreased with
increasing concentration of herbicide in all genotypes. Maximum number of shoots in
control was found in genotype IPU-94-1(4.00±0.58) while minimum in Azad-1 and PU-
19(3.33±0.88). At 0.1 mM genotype PU-19 and IPU-94-1 showed maximum shoot
number (2.00±0.58) and Azad-1 and Azad-2 showed least shoot number (1.00±0.58).
There was not great variation in shoot length among genotypes. Longest shoots in
control were found in PU-31(2.70±0.15cm) and shortest in PU-35(2.20±0.18cm) while in
case of 0.1 mM media maximum shoot length was in Azad-1 (1.37±0.22cm) and
minimum in Azad-2(1.07±0.03cm) (Table-4.36).
100
4.3.3 Media Tested for Root Formation
4.3.3.1 NAA-3.0+BAP-1.0mg/l
In this combination four types of seedling explants: leaf segments, cotyledonary
node, hypocotyl and shoot apex were used to assess effect of glyphosate on root
formation, root number and root length as there are many reports in which glyphosate
caused reduction in root number and root length. All the explants showed positive
response in this combination but hypocotyl and cotyledonary node explants showed
better response than leaf segments and shoot apex (Table-4.38). In all seedling explants
first callusing was observed and then roots initiated at different places depending upon
the explant. In control rooting was observed in all explants and in all genotypes but in
herbicide treated media rooting was observed usually in leaf segments and hypocotyl
explants. Herbicide showed also showed negative effect on percent root response,
number of roots per explant and root length and they were found decreased on increasing
herbicide concentration.
4.3.3.1.1 Leaf Segments as Source of Explants
Leaf segments initially formed callus at cut ends and midrib region then root
were proliferated from callus that appeared originate from midrib tissue (Plate-16 A, B).
Roots were observed up to 0.05 mM except in Azad-2 at 0.01 mM. Percent root response
were maximum in IPU-94-1 (85.00) followed by Azad-1 and PU-35 (80.00) and
minimum in PU-19 (68.33). At 0.01 mM percent root response was decreased with
respect to control in all genotypes except in PU-19 where it was increased up to 80.00%.
At 0.05 mM highest percent root response was recorded in PU-19 (65.00) while lowest
in PU-31 and PU-35 (35.00). Maximum number of roots per explant was found in
control and among genotypes highest in PU-19 (5 .89±0.40) and minimum in Azad-2
(2.78±0.06). In 0.05 mM maximum number of roots was observed in PU-19
(3.78±0.29cm) and minimum in PU-35 (1.89±0.07). Root length in control was also
maximum in PU-19 (3.67±0.22cm) and minimum in PU-31 (2.15±0.14cm). At 0.05 mM
maximum root length was in PU-19 (2.57±0.23cm) and minimum in Azad-1
(1.57±0.21cm) (Table-4.39, Plate-16).
4.3.3.1.2 Cotyledonary Node as Source of Explants
Cotyledonary node explants also gave good response for rooting with sufficient
callusing (Plate-16 J; Plate-17 F, H, I). In some genotypes like PU-35 few shoots were
also observed with roots and callus (Plate-17 H). Percentage of explants that showed
rooting (% rooting response) was decreased as glyphosate concentration in media was
101
increased. Highest percent root response was recorded in control and among genotypes
highest value reached in genotype PU-19 (75.00) and minimum in PU-31 where no
response was observed in any treatment. At 0.01 mM only PU-19, PU-35 and Azad-1
showed rooting in cotyledonary node explants while at 0.05 mM PU-19, IPU-94-1 and
Azad-2 showed response and maximum value was found in IPU-94-1(40.00). Number of
roots per explant and root length did not showed definite pattern of decrease on
increasing herbicide concentrations like other parameters in other responses like callus
fresh weight, shoot number and shoot length. Root number was highest in control media
and among responding genotypes Azad-1 showed maximum value (16.18±0.34) and
Azad-2 showed minimum value (5.98±0.08). At 0.05 mM maximum roots were found in
IPU-94-1 (6.78±0.98) and minimum in Azad-2 (1.56±0.45). Usually longest roots were
in control but in some genotypes PU-35 and Azad-1 average root length was slightly
increased in 0.01 mM. At 0.05 mM longest roots were in IPU-94-1(3.09±0.24cm) and
shortest in PU-19 (2.43±0.22cm) (Table-4.39, Plate-16, 17).
4.3.3.1.3 Hypocotyl Explant as Source of Explants
Hypocotyl explants were found best for rooting and callusing in PGR
combination of NAA-3.0+BAP-1.0 mg/l. Rooting were observed in all genotypes in
control, 0.01 mM (except Azad-2), 0.05 mM (except IPU-94-1), 0.1 mM (except Azad-
2) and at 0.2 mM in PU-19, PU-35 and Azad-1 (Plate-17 B, C, E). Percent root response
decreased in a dose dependent manner. In control maximum response was found in
Azad-1 (71.67) and minimum in PU-19 and Azad-2 (60.00) (Figure-4.15 A). At 0.1 mM
genotype IPU-94-1 (30.00) showed maximum root response while Azad-2 did not show
response. Root number per explant and root length was usually higher than other
explants. In control maximum roots were recorded in IPU-94-1 (14.89±0.99) and
minimum in Azad-2 (10.22±0.62) where as at 0.1 mM maximum roots were recorded in
Azad-1(5.00±0.19) and minimum in Azad-2 (Figure-4.15 B). Longest roots were found
in control and among genotypes IPU-94-1 showed maximum value (5.83±0.19cm) and
minimum in Azad-2 (3.70±0.46cm) while shortest one were observed in 0.1 mM. At 0.1
mM maximum root length was in PU-19 (1.87±0.52cm) and minimum in PU-
31(1.20±0.26 cm) (Plate-17 L) (Figure-4.15 C). ANOVA showed that in case of
hypocotyl explant mean values in percent root response, number of roots per explant and
average root length for both factors (factor -1-genotype and factor-2- herbicide
treatment) and their interaction were significant (Table-4.40, Appendix Table-25, 26,
27).
102
4.3.3.1.4 Shoot Apex as Source of Explants
Shoot apex explants was least responding and most sensitive for herbicide
glyphosate among all explants and produced roots only in control and lower
concentrations. In shoot apex explants callusing was observed at base and at apex very
few shoots produced. From callus roots were proliferated later (Plate-16 G, H, I).
Maximum root response in control was noticed in genotype PU-19 (65.00%) and
minimum in IPU-94-1 (0.00%). At 0.01 mM roots were not found in IPU-94-1, PU-31
and Azad-2 whereas at further concentrations response was not found in any genotypes.
At 0.01 mM maximum roots were obtained in PU-19 (2.33±0.19) and minimum in PU-
35 (1.97±0.31) while longest roots were recorded in Azad-1(1.87±0.32cm) and shortest
in PU-35 (1.54±0.07cm) (Table-4.39).
103
4.4 Gradual Stress Treatment of Callus Cultures of Selected Tolerant Genotypes
The effect of herbicide treated media on callus growth is summarized in Table
4.39. Callus fresh weight data were analyzed using the ANOVA procedure for a
completely randomized design. Glyphosate treatment significantly inhibited callus
growth as observed by consistent decrease in fresh weight with the increasing
concentration of herbicide. At 0.01 mM significant (p < 0.05) decrease in fresh weight
was observed only in Azad-1, however at next herbicide level 0.05 mM, all genotypes
showed significant reduction in fresh weight and maximum fresh weight was observed in
PU-19 (1.61±0.09g) whereas IPU-94-1 showed minimum fresh weight (1.48±0.06g)
(Table-4.41, 4.42). The selection procedure was stopped at 0.4 mM where a marked
decrease in callus growth was seen and the herbicide treatment was observed to be lethal
to all genotypes. The callus at this stage was blackish brown with some small greenish
areas (Plate-19 G).
When cultures were gradually subcultured on media with higher concentration of
glyphosate, inhibition was observed in all growth parameters but it was less than shock
treatment. Range of percent of surviving cultures was 93 to 10%. Maximum culture
survival was in control and usually decreased on increasing glyphosate concentration
except in PU-19 at 0.05mM where it was increased (Figure-4.17). At highest stress level
(0.4 mM) maximum percentage of surviving cultures were found in PU-19 (30%) and
minimum in Azad-1 (10%).
Response of genotypes for callus fresh weight was similar to shock treatment and
it further confirmed the higher tolerance of IPU-94-1 and PU-19 than Azad-1. Tolerance
index was also decreased with increasing herbicide concentration. Tolerance index was
maximum in 0.01mM and lowest in 0.4mM. At 0.01 highest tolerance index was in PU-
19 (61.47) and lowest in Azad-1 (54.01). Accordingly tolerance index was also highest
for IPU-94-1 at 0.4mM. (Figure-4.18).
4.5 Shock Treatment of Callus Cultures of Selected Tolerant Genotypes
In direct shock treatment at highest stress level (0.4 mM) maximum percentage of
surviving cultures was observed in IPU-94-1(10%) while minimum value obtained in
PU-19 (6.67%) and in Azad-1 there was no cultures survived at this concentration.
Callus fresh weight (CFW) after four weeks of subculture (directly on high stress media)
was also reduced significantly at all stress levels (Plate-18). CFW was found highest in
control media and lowest on stress media of 0.4 mM. Among genotypes maximum callus
fresh weight at highest stress level was found in IPU-94-1 with minimum 86.74%
104
reduction over control while Azad-1 showed 100% reduction in fresh weight because of
complete death of inoculated callus in 0.4 mM. Similarly tolerance index at 0.4 mM was
found maximum in IPU-94-1 and lowest for Azad-1 (Figure-4.18) (Table-4.41, 4.42).
On comparing both types of stress treatment it was concluded that shock
treatment of herbicide stress was inhibitorier than gradual treatment on callus growth in
all three genotypes.
105
4.6 In vivo Assessment of Effect of Herbicide and Tolerance in Vigna mungo
Genotypes
Healthy seeds (soaked in water for 24 hr) of three better performing genotypes
PU-19, IPU-94-1 and Azad-1 screened via in vitro methods were first soaked in water for
24 hours and then sown in field under wire house conditions. After 21 days of sowing
plants were subjected to post emergent treatment of different concentration of glyphosate
herbicide i.e., control, 1 mM, 2 mM, 4 mM, 6 mM and 8 mM. Effect of herbicide on
biochemical parameters were assessed 4-5 days after treatment, survival percentage was
taken after 15 days of treatment while growth and yield parameters were taken after
harvesting. The parameters studied were survival percentage, plant height, number of
nodes, internodal length, number of pods, pod length, number of seeds per pod, number
of seeds per plant. Changes in the plant morphology and yield were genotype-dependent,
responding differently to glyphosate.
4.6.1 Morphological and Yield Parameters
4.6.1.1 Survival Percentage
The F-ratio was found to be statistically significant at 1% (i.e. p < 0.01) for all
treatments of glyphosate. Survival percentage taken 15 DAT showed dose dependent
decrease in all the genotypes and treatments. The data was taken only up to 6 mM dose
as survival at 8 mM was nil. Glyphosate treatment of even lowest dose showed adverse
impact on survival percentage in all the three black gram genotypes. Survival percentage
was highest in control and lowest in 6 mM. At highest concentration, 6 mM genotype
PU-19 showed maximum survival percentage (31.11±2.22%) whereas Azad-1 showed
minimum (22.22±2.22%) (Table-4.43, Figure-4.18 A). Significant difference with
respect to control was observed in all treatments and genotypes except PU-19 in 1 mM.
Thus on the basis of response of three genotypes at 6 mM PU-19 can better tolerate the
herbicide toxicity as compared to IPU-94-1 and Azad-1.
Two way ANOVA calculated for survival percentages of three genotypes grown
in field showed significant effect of only concentration (factor 2) while effect of
genotype (factor 1) and interaction between genotype and concentration was not
significant. Factor 1-F2,30=3.019,p=0.0639; Factor 2- F4,30=143.1,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-
F8,30=1.398, p=0.2378 (Appendix Table-28)
4.6.1.2 Plant Height (cm)
The F-ratio was found to be statistically significant at 1% (i.e. p < 0.01) in all
genotypes of Vigna mungo. The over all maximum and minimum height was observed to
106
be at control and 6 mM treatment of glyphosate respectively. The plant height of Vigna
mungo genotypes in all herbicide treatments ranged from 43.33±2.41cm (control) to
9.67±0.33 cm (6 mM). Plant height decreased at all concentration of herbicide in all
genotypes (Plate-20). Among controls maximum height was observed in genotype IPU-
94-1 (43.33±2.41cm) and minimum in Azad-1 (37.67±1.45cm) whereas as highest
concentration tallest plants were observed in PU-19 (13.00±1.00cm) and shortest in
Azad-1 (9.67±0.33cm) (Table -4.43, Figure-4.18 B).
Two way ANOVA calculated for plant height of three genotypes grown in field
showed significant effect of concentration (factor 2) and genotype (factor 1) while effect
of interaction between genotype and concentration was not significant. Factor 1-
F2,30=10.55,p=0.0003; Factor 2- F4,30=247.1,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F8,30=0.922, p=0.5125
(Appendix Table-29).
4.6.1.3 Number of Nodes per Plant
The F-ratio was found to be statistically significant at 1% (i.e. p < 0.01) in all
genotypes of Vigna mungo. The over all maximum and minimum number of nodes was
observed to be at control and 6 mM treatment of glyphosate respectively. Like height of
plants number of nodes of all genotypes of Vigna mungo in all herbicide treatments
decreased with increasing herbicide dose. On comparing the means, number of nodes at
2 mM, 4 mM and 6 mM were found to be significantly (p<0.05 or p<0.01) lower as
compared to control in all genotypes (Table-4.44). In control maximum and minimum
number of nodes was observed in IPU-94-1 (22.46±0.92) and Azad-1 (18.47±0.60)
respectively whereas at 6 mM maximum and minimum number of nodes was found in
PU-19 (9.88±0.76) and IPU-94-1 (8.93±0.75) respectively (Figure-4.18 C).
Two way anova for number of nodes showed extremely significant effect of
genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) and significant effect of interaction
between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F2,30=12.27,p<0.0001; Factor 2-
F4,30=88.15,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F8,30=3.518, p=0.0055(Appendix Table-30).
4.6.1.4 Internodal Length
The F-ratio was found to be statistically significant at 1% (i.e. p < 0.01) in all
genotypes of Vigna mungo. Negative effect of glyphosate was also observed on
internodal length of treated plants and it was significantly (p<0.01) reduced in all the
treatments except at 1 mM in PU-19 and Azad-1 (Table-4.44). The over all maximum
and minimum internodal length was observed to be at control and 6 mM treatment of
glyphosate respectively and it ranged from 2.59±0.18cm (control-IPU-94-1) to
107
1.10±0.07cm (6 mM -IPU-94-1) among all genotypes. Among 6 mM maximum
internodal length was observed in Azad-1(1.19±0.03 cm) and minimum in IPU-94-
1(1.10±0.07cm) (Figure-4.19 A).
Two way ANOVA calculated for internodal length showed extremely significant
effect of only concentration (factor 2) but effect of genotype (factor 1) and of interaction
between genotype and concentration was not significant. Factor 1-F2,30=2.984,p<0.0658;
Factor 2- F4,30=36.35,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F8,30=3.518, p=0.1902 (Appendix Table-31).
4.6.1.5 Number of Pods per Plant
The F-ratio was found to be statistically significant at 1% (i.e. p < 0.01) in all the
genotypes of Vigna mungo. The effect of glyphosate was also seen on the yield as
reflected by a gradual decrease in the number of pods per plant, pod length and seeds per
pod. The number of pods per plant was 16.10±0.88 in PU-19, 16.93±0.90 in IPU-94-1
and 15.03±1.09 in Azad-1 in the control (Table-4.45). It was decreased significantly
(p<0.05 or p<0.01) after glyphosate treatment in all treatments and all genotypes. At 6
mM, the number of pods per plant was 8.94±0.61 in PU-19, 7.75±0.43 in IPU-94-1 and
7.29±0.47 in Azad-1 (Figure-4.19 B).
Two way ANOVA calculated for number of pods per plant showed extremely
significant effect of only concentration (factor 2) but effect of genotype (factor 1) and of
interaction between genotype and concentration was not significant. Factor 1-
F2,30=0.429,p<0.6546; Factor 2- F4,30=65.36,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F8,30=1.254, p=0.3034
(Appendix Table-32).
4.6.1.6 Length of Pods (cm)
The F-ratio was found to be statistically significant at 1% (i.e. p < 0.01) in all the
genotypes of Vigna mungo. Glyphosate treatment affected pod length as well. Significant
difference in pod length was observed in 2 mM, 4 mM and 6 mM. It was 4.26±0.14cm in
PU-19, 4.95±0.05cm in IPU-94-1 and 4.58±0.28 in Azad-1 in the control (Table-4.45).
A gradual decrease in the pod length was observed after glyphosate treatment. At 6 mM,
the pod length was 3.51±0.22cm in PU-19, 3.32±0.13cm in IPU-94-1 and 3.50±0.06cm
in Azad-1 (Figure-4.19 C).
Two way ANOVA calculated for pod length plant showed extremely significant
effect of only concentration (factor 2) but effect of genotype (factor 1) and of interaction
between genotype and concentration was not significant. Factor 1-F2,30=1.442,p<0.2523;
Factor 2- F4,30=23.91,p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F8,30=1.535, p=0.1870 (Appendix Table-33).
108
4.6.1.7 Number of Seed per Pod
The number of seeds per pod was also decreased with increasing glyphosate
concentration. It was 5.15±0.20 in PU-19, 5.50±0.26 in IPU-94-1 and 5.65±0.34 in
Azad-1 in the control (Table-4.45). At 6 mM, the number of seeds per pod was
3.35±0.17 in PU-19, 3.40±0.20 in IPU-94-1 and 3.66±0.04 in Azad-1.
Two way ANOVA calculated for number of seed per pod plant showed
extremely significant effect of only concentration (factor 2) but effect of genotype (factor
1) and of interaction between genotype and concentration was not significant (Appendix
Table-34).
4.6.2 Biochemical Parameters
4.6.2.1 Pigment Estimation
The effect of glyphosate was also seen on leaf pigments. Chlorophyll a,
chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids were measured in the leaves of control
and treated plants. All of these registered a decrease after glyphosate treatment.
4.6.2.1.1 Chlorophyll a, b and Total Chlorophyll
In the controls, Chl a was 1.39±0.01 mg/g FW in PU-19, 1.65±0.06 mg/g FW in
IPU-94-1, and 1.47±0.05 mg/g FW in Azad-1 (Table-4.46). At 6 mM glyphosate dose
chl a content decreased to 0.14±0.02 mg/g FW in PU-19, 0.31±0.02 mg/g FW in IPU-94-
1, and 0.32±0.01 mg/g FW in Azad-1. Thus, chl a content was highly reduced in PU-19
as compared to IPU-94-1 and Azad-1(Figure-4.21 A). In control plants, Chl b was
0.66±0.02 mg/g FW in PU-19, 0.78±0.02 mg/g FW in IPU-94-1, and 0.62±0.02 mg/g
FW in Azad-1 (Figure-4.21 B). It also showed a significant decrease after glyphosate
treatment. At 6 mM chl b content decreased to 0.34±0.04 mg/g FW in PU-19, 0.35±0.05
mg/g FW in IPU-94-1, and 0.22±0.03 mg/g FW in Azad-1. In case of Chl b Azad-1
showed the more decrease as compared to IPU-94-1 and Azad-1.
Total Chl was 1.39±0.01 mg/g FW in PU-19, 2.46±0.07 mg/g FW in IPU-94-1,
and 2.03±0.05/g FW in Azad-1. Herbicide treatment caused significant decrease in all
the treatments and genotypes. At 6 mM total Chl decreased to 0.74±0.03 mg/g FW in
PU-19, 0.69±0.04 mg/g FW in IPU-94-1, and 0.66±0.05/g FW in Azad-1(Figure-4.20
C).
4.6.2.1.2 Carotenoids
Carotenoids were also estimated, and like chlorophyll they too showed reduction
after glyphosate exposure. In the control plants carotenoids were 0.70±0.02 mg/g FW in
PU-19 and Azad-1, 0.72±0.04 mg/g FW in IPU-94-1 (Table-4.47, Figure-4.21 C).
109
Azad-1 showed significant decrease in carotenoids in all concentrations while other two
genotypes showed significant reduction only in 4 mM and 6 mM. At 6 mM glyphosate
concentration carotenoids decreased to 0.30±0.02 mg/g FW in PU-19, 0.32±0.03 mg/g
FW in IPU-94-1, and 0.29±0.01 mg/g FW in Azad-1.
Thus the above results show that glyphosate severely affects pigment content.
The reduction in pigment content suggested that glyphosate disturbed pigment
metabolism in plants.
4.6.2.1.3 Catalase Activity
In field experiment catalase activity was measured after 4 days of treatment in
leaves of three genotypes of Vigna mungo. Amongst the controls, catalase activity was
lowest, 166.67±13.35 µmole H2O2 decomposed/100mg FW in leaves of IPU-94-1. In
PU-19, it was 200.00±11.56 µmole H2O2 decomposed/100mg FW and 186.67±17.66
µmole H2O2 decomposed/100mg FW in Azad-1 (Table-4.48, Figure-4.20 A). The
catalase activity was increased in a dose dependent manner after glyphosate treatment in
all the three genotypes except in Azad-1 where activity slightly declines in 6 mM. At 6
mM glyphosate dose, the activities were 960.00±23.12 µmole H2O2 decomposed/100mg
FW in PU-19, 773.33±29.09 µmole H2O2 decomposed/100mg FW in IPU-94-1, and
486.67±17.66 µmole H2O2 decomposed/100mg FW in Azad-1. According to LSD test,
the increase in activity in all the treatments as compared to control was significant in all
the three genotypes.
Two way ANOVA for catalase activity in herbicide treated leaves showed
extremely significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as
interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F2,30=150.4,p<0.0001; Factor
2- F4,30=361.6, p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F8,30=26.79, p=0.0001 (Appendix Table- 39).
4.6.2.1.4 Peroxidase Activity
In field experiment peroxidase activity was measured after 4 days of treatment in
leaves of three genotypes of Vigna mungo. In control plants genotype IPU-94-1 showed
maximum activity (3.73±0.32 ΔOD/100mg FW) and genotype PU-19 showed minimum
peroxidase activity (2.37±0.10 ΔOD/100mg FW). Peroxidase activity also significantly
increased like catalase with the increasing herbicide concentration in 1 mM and 2 mM
and then it was decreased but in case of PU-19 it was consistently increased up to 4 mM
and the decreased. At 6 mM highest activity was obtained in Azad-1 (6.88±0.40
ΔOD/100mg FW) where as lowest activity was shown by IPU-94-1 (5.06±0.32
ΔOD/100mg FW) (Table-4.48).
110
Two way ANOVA for peroxidase activity in herbicide treated leaves showed
extremely significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as
interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F2,30=30.83,p<0.0001; Factor
2- F4,30=90.11, p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F8,30=12.67, p=0.0001(Appendix Table- 40).
4.6.2.1.5 Superoxide Dismutase Activity
Activity of antioxidative enzyme SOD was also measured in herbicide treated
leaves of three Vigna mungo genotypes. In the controls it was 10.70±0.63 in PU-19,
11.99±1.05 in IPU-94-1, and 12.38±0.78 in Azad-1. After the glyphosate treatment, the
activity was found to increase significantly (p<0.05 or p<0.01) in all the three varieties
from 2 mM except in IPU-94-1 where it was decreased sharply at 6 mM (Table-4.49,
Figure-4.20 B). The SOD activity at 6 mM was 18.32±0.53 in PU-19, 11.99±1.05 in
IPU-94-1, and 18.96±0.63 in Azad-1. The increase in SOD activity also suggests that
glyphosate is inducing oxidative stress in V. mungo.
Two way ANOVA for SOD activity in herbicide treated leaves also showed
extremely significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as
interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F2,30=44.57,p<0.0001; Factor
2- F4,30=26.24, p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F8,30=4.570, p=0.0010 (Appendix Table- 41).
4.6.2.1.6 Total Protein Content
Post emergent treatment of glyphosate caused a general increase in total protein
content as compared to control in all treatments and genotypes. In IPU-94-1 there was
not significant difference in protein content at any concentration (treatment) and here
slight increase was occurred at 6 mM while other two genotypes showed significant
differences in all concentrations but there was slight decline in protein content at 6 mM
as compared to 4 mM. In controls minimum protein content was in Azad-1 (5.69±0.25
mg/g fw) and maximum in IPU-94-1 (6.78±0.30 mg/g fw). At 6 mM minimum protein
content was found inPU-19 (6.20±0.09 mg/g fw) and maximum in IPU -94-1 (7.75±0.99
mg/g fw) (Table-4.49, Figure-4.22 C).
Two way ANOVA for protein content in herbicide treated leaves revealed that
there was not significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and interaction between genotype
and concentration on protein content but there was significant effect of
concentration()factor-2. Factor 1-F2,30=1.811,p<0.0001; Factor 2- F4,30=3.602, p<0.0001;
factor 1x2-F8,30=0.6117, p=0.0010 (Appendix Table- 42)
111
4.6.2.1.7 MDA Content
To assess effect of herbicide glyphosate on lipid membranes of leaves
malondialdehyde content was analysed in leaves of three Vigna mungo genotypes. In the
controls it was 68.67±0.52 nmole/g FW tissue in PU-19, 60.60±1.30 nmole/g fw tissue in
IPU-94-1, and 58.99±1.50 nmole/g FW tissue in Azad-1. After the glyphosate treatment,
MDA was found to increase significantly (p<0.05 or p<0.01) in all the three varieties in 4
mM and 6 mM in all the three genotypes. (Table-4.50, Figure-4.22 A). MDA content at
6 mM was 99.00±0.82 nmole/g FW tissue in PU-19, 68.69±0.90 nmole/g FW tissue in
IPU-94-1, and 71.01±0.54 nmole/g FW tissue in Azad-1. The increase in MDA content
indicates that glyphosate caused lipid membrane damage in V. mungo.
Two way ANOVA for MDA content in herbicide treated leaves showed
extremely significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) as well as
for interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F2,30=172.1,p<0.0001;
Factor 2- F4,30=82.20, p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F8,30=20.59, p=0.0001 (Appendix Table- 43)
4.6.2.1.8 Proline Content
Under many abiotic stresses proline levels are found to be increased. Thus in our
studies effect of herbicide glyphosate on proline content was also estimated in leaves of
three Vigna mungo genotypes. In the controls it was 0.65±0.02 µmole/g FW tissue in
PU-19, 0.61±0.01 µmole/g FW tissue in IPU-94-1, and 0.67±0.05µmole/g FW tissue in
Azad-1. After the glyphosate treatment, proline was usually found to increase in all
treatments and genotypes but significant (p<0.05 or p<0.01) increase was found only at 4
mM and 6 mM. (Table-4.50, Figure-4.22 B). Proline content at 6 mM was 1.01±0.04
µmole/g FW tissue in PU-19, 1.12±0.08 µmole/g FW tissue in IPU-94-1, and 1.35±0.14
µmole/g FW tissue in Azad-1.
Two way ANOVA for proline content in herbicide treated leaves showed
extremely significant effect of genotype (factor 1) and concentration (factor 2) but not
for interaction between genotype and concentration. Factor 1-F2,30=6.181,p=0.0057;
Factor 2- F4,30=44.21, p<0.0001; factor 1x2-F8,30=1.662, p=0.1493(Appendix Table-44).
112
5.0 Discussion
Crop improvement relies on the ability to generate genetic variation and
selection of individuals with improved characteristics. Improvement in legumes by
conventional breeding is limited due to available narrow genetic base as well as natural
barriers of crossing between species. Tissue culture is a technique based on the
phenomenon of totipotency of plant cell which underlines its genetic potential to produce
the complete plant and its ability to perform all the functions of development which are
characteristics of zygote (Haberlandt, 1902). With respect of crop improvement plant
cells and tissue culture is also potent approach which provides diverse type of input to
plant breeding efforts.
In recent past several novel techniques developed from plant tissue culture
approch viz. micropropagation, anther culture, in vitro selection, embryo rescue,
somaclonal variation, somatic hybridization and transformation which can be used to
increase the efficiency of the breeding process, to improve the accessibility of existing
germplasm and to create new variation and screen germplasm for desired traits.
Present study was aimed to investigate methods for screening of herbicide
tolerant genotypes in urd bean. Herbicide tolerant genotypes screened in this study will
be useful resources for development of herbicide tolerant cultivars as well as for
undertaking genetic and physiological studies on herbicide tolerance in Vigna mungo.
Genetic variability for herbicide tolerance among genotypes of Vigna spp and
other crops was studied earlier by many workers. Si et al. (2012) identified a number of
highly tolerant yellow lupin genotypes to metribuzin and carfentrazone-ethyl herbicides.
LD50 of the two herbicides were used to screen diverse yellow lupin landraces and wild
types to quantify the diversity of the germplasm. Considerable variation in response to
the two herbicides was observed among the genotypes screened, ranging from complete
plant death to no symptoms. Genotypes with no damage were considered as tolerant
while genotypes showing complete death were susceptible. Farnham and Harrison,
(1993) screened broccoli cultivars for tolerance to oxyfluorfen herbicide after post
emergent and pre emergent application of herbicide. Tolerant cultivar (Pinnacle) showed
least foliar damage and reduction in fresh weight while Green Goliath was very
susceptible to oxyfluorfen. Gaur et al., (2013) found that large genetic variability
113
occurred in chickpea for tolerance to herbicides imazethapyr and metribuzin and the
sensitivity of the genotypes to metribuzin was higher compared to that for imazethapyr.
In our studies screening of herbicide tolerant genotypes has been carried out
by in vitro as well as in vivo approches. Tolerant genotypes for other abiotic stresses
have also been selected in many crops by both in vivo and in vitro methods viz. in Beta
vulgaris for drought tolerance (Ober and Luterbacher, 2002), in Vicia faba for drought
tolerance (Link et al., 1999), in Pisum sativum for cadmium toxicity (Metwally et al.,
2005). Genotypic variation was also observed in response to increased carbon dioxide
concentration for growth and yield of Vigna mungo genotypes (Jyothi Lakshmi et al.,
2013).
During present investigations, first in vitro screening for herbicide tolerance in
Vigna mungo genotypes was done by petri dish germination bioassay method in presence
of herbicide. In spite of development of many analytical methods, bioassay is still a main
tool for qualitative and quantitative determination of herbicides phytotoxicity. Bioassay
methodologies are usually more economical, less difficult to perform and do not require
as much expensive equipments as in chemical analytical methods. Among many
bioassays petri-dish bioassay is more co mMonly used as the basis of germination test
that allows simple and inexpensive analysis of biological activity of environmental
pollutants, including herbicides and other hazardous agrochemicals. O’Donovan et al.,
(1996) used seedling bioassay to study response of wild oat to triallate herbicide on filter
paper in petri dishes. Petri dish bioassays have been effectively used in green foxtail for
study of herbicide resistance to trifluralin (Beckie et al., 1990), in wild oat for
aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides (Murray et al., 1996).
5.1 Seedling Parameters (Germination percentage, survival percentage, root length
shoot length, fresh weight, dry weight)
Roundup is widely used in modern agriculture as a weedicide and being
nonselective it also causes damage to nontarget crops. There are several reports on
detrimental effect of glyphosate on seed germination and seedling growth. In our study
too an adverse affect of herbicide on germination was observed in both petri dish
germination and in vitro germination on MS media. Germination, seedling survival and
all other seedling parameters showed an inverse relationship with herbicide dose.
Maximum germination percentage was in control and minimum in 10 mM dose.
Maximum percent decrease over control in germination percentage at 10 mM in PU-35
and Azad-2 while minimum percent inhibition over control was found in Azad-1.
114
Reduction in germination caused by herbicides has been explained due to delay or
inhibition of physiological and biological processes necessary for seed germination
which include enzyme activity. Jain and Kumari, (2012) suggested that inhibition of
germination by glyphosate was due to effect of herbicide on amylase activity in Cajanus
cajan. Blackburn and Boutin, (2003) found that roundup (1%, 10% or 100% of a 890 g
a.i./ha label rate solution) reduce germination and growth of the F1 generation of seeds
produced by plants sprayed with the herbicide. Shaukat et al., (1980) reported that 2,4-D
and 2,4,5-T were highly inhibitory for seed germinaton and early seedling growth of
Vigna radiata and Vigna mungo while MCPB (Methyl-chlorophenoxybutyric acid)
suppressed germination, root and shoot growth.
Pfeilstetter et al., (2000) performed rapid and efficient screening of
phosphinothricin tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus) from non transgenic rape
seedlings with a novel germination test. The method was based on the germination of
rape seeds on filter paper soaked with a 0.005% phosphinothricin solution. Under these
conditions inhibition of seedling development by the herbicide can be observed after 10
days. The germination test gains an advantage over the routinely used herbicide
spraying, because it is rapid, needs little space and allows efficient screening of huge
numbers of seeds.
Salazar and Appleby, (1982) also found that glyphosate reduced germination of
two legumes and three grasses and reduced seedling growth of all species when applied
at rate of 1.0 and 3.0 kg/ha and paraquat (1,1′-dimethyl-4,4-bipyridinium ion) at 0.6
kg/ha to exposed seeds of six grasses and two legume species. Paraquat was toxic only to
the grasses. Glyphosate mainly affected germination and growth of legumes when
applied directly to their seeds. Preharvest glyphosate applications lead to a general
decrease in germination percentage. Baig et al., (2003) observed that preharvest
application of glyphosate in pea reduced seed germination and seedling emergence. In
another experiment two Triticum aestivum varieties were assessed for effects of
preharvest glyphosate treatment. Glyphosate was applied at 0.62 or 0.84 kg ae/ha at the
milk, soft dough, or hard dough stage of wheat development; or 7 d following the hard
dough treatment, and 1 d prior to wheat harvest. Glyphosate application at milk stage
affected seed germination (Yenish and Young, 2000). McLaren and Don, (2002) showed
that preharvest treatment of Derkado barley crops with glyphosate resulted in decreased
levels of germination while Grey and Prostko, (2010) found that glyphosate application
reduce peanut pod yield and peanut seed mass but glyphosate applied at any rate or
115
timing did not affect seed viability. Rajashekar et al., (2012) reported that herbicide
pendimethalin reduced seed germination, radicle and plumule length in maize.
After glyphosate treatment root length was significantly decreased with
increasing concentration of herbicide glyphosate in all genotypes of Vigna mungo and in
all treatments. Percent reduction in seedling root length can be used as an important
parameter for assessment of herbicide tolerance among cultivars. In our experiments at
higher dose of herbicide genotypes showing lower percent reduction viz. PU-19, IPU-94-
1 and Azad-1 could better tolerate the herbicide stress as compared to PU-35, PU-31 and
Azad-2. Many reports have clearly demonstrated that glyphosate decrease root length.
The reason for reduced root length may be genotoxic effect of herbicide on root
meristem. Glyphosate induced inhibition of root length by herbicide in various crops has
been reported by many workers (Agnieszka et al., 2011; Jain and Kumari, 2012). Pre
emergent treatment of glyphosate in Vigna radiata seeds caused a significant decrease in
seedling root length (Basantani et al., 2011). Hampton and Hebblethwaite, (2006) found
that after preharvest application of 1 and 2 litres ha-1
IPA glyphosate (isopropylamine
salt of glyphosate) to a seed crop of perennial ryegrass, germination was significantly
reduced and abnormal seedlings were produced. The germination of seed harvested in
the previous year from glyphosate treated plots decreased with storage. Seed vigour,
germination rate and field emergence were also significantly decreased as a result of
glyphosate application.
In black gram seedlings glyphosate treatment at 8 and 10 mM in petri dish
experiment caused stunting and thickening of primary roots that lacked root hairs
whereas in in vitro seed germination experiment there was complete absence of roots at
concentrations higher than 0.8 mM. It may be due to inhibited growth and death of
radicle, hypocotyl and cotyledons caused by glyphosate as proposed by Kamble, (2008).
He also found that glyphosate causes inhibition of linear growth of seedlings and causes
swelling in Hibiscus cannabinus Linn. Glyphosate caused more damage to radicle as
compared to hypocotyl. Rubin et al., (1982) also found that glyphosate treated seedlings
were short and stubby, and the roots had few or no secondary roots and percent relative
growth of roots were decreased with the increasing glyphosate concentration. Stunted
roots with somewhat swelling was observed in treated seedlings of higher doses. These
altered morphogenic responses under stress conditions might had involved inhibition of
cell elongation, localized stimulation of cell division and alterations in cell
differentiation status. The common molecular processes such as increased ROS-
116
production and altered phytohormone transport and/or metabolism occurs under abiotic
stresses. The stress-induced morphogenic response is postulated to be part of a general
acclimation strategy, whereby plant growth is redirected to diminish stress exposure
(Potters et al., 2007).
Hassan, (1988) reported that glyphosate treatment at different concentrations did
not affect the germination percentage in wheat cultivars but in comparison to the control,
the herbicide treatment caused significant reduction in seedling root and shoot lengths.
The reduction increased proportional to increasing in herbicide concentration. Treatment
with high concentrations of the glyphosate caused significant reduction in total root
number per seedling. Wheat cultivar showed clear variation in susceptability to
glyphosate treatment. In our studies also differential genotypic response has been
observed for glyphosate toxicity in black gram. Reduction in shoot growth after
treatment of sulfonylureas herbicide amidosulfuron was reported in target plant
Chenopodium album and non target plant Hordeum vulgare by Žaltauskaitė and
Brazaitytė, (2011). De Felipe et al., (1986) found significant effect of herbicide
isoproturon on root growth of wheat. Nacheva et al., (2010) found that herbicide
(Terbacil, Pendimethalin and Napropamide) caused suppression of the root growth of
rooted plants under in vitro conditions in Prunus cerasifera embryos and some
micropropagated rootstocks of fruit trees and also found inhibition of root meristem
growth and browning of cotyledons after the treatment with pendimethalin.
Pendimethalin and napropamide showed a depressing effect on the root formation.
Shimina and Neelamegam, (2009) found that the herbicide Excel Mera-71
inhibited the growth of black gram seedlings, except root/shoot ratio and the inhibitory
effect was increased with increasing concentration of herbicide. The adverse effect of
herbicide foliar spray treatment was higher in 7 day old seedlings than in 15 day old
seedlings. The tolerance index of black gram seedlings against herbicide foliar spray
treatment was more in 15 day old seedlings while, it was reduced in 7 day old seedlings.
Deleterious effect of glyphosate was observed on fresh weight and dry weight of
seedlings of all genotypes of black gram in our experiments both petri dish and in vitro
grown seedlings. At the highest glyphosate concentration fresh weight was maximum in
IPU-94-1 and minimum in PU-31. Maximum and minimum reduction of dry weight at
10 mM was observed in PU-31 and PU-35. It was concluded that fresh weight
measurement is more convincing parameter to assess the relative tolerance of cultivars
for agrochemicals as compared to dry weight. Other studies also reported that the
117
application of glyphosate led to a continuous decrease in the fresh weight of plants like
maize (Sergiev et al., 2006), pea (Baig et al., 2003). Glyphosate has also been known to
reduce leaf dry matter accumulation in Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Brecke and Duke, 1980).
Deleterious effect of herbicide on seedling dry weight was observed at all concentration
of herbicide glyphosate in Lolium multiflorum (Perez and Kogan, 2003). There was
significant decrease in shoot fresh and dry weight after atrazine treatment (Nemat Alla
and Hassan, 2006) and after isoproturon treatment in maize (Nemat Alla et al., 2008b).
El Tayeb and Zaki, (2009) also found that seedling fresh weight and dry weight reduced
on increasing concentration and duration of roundup. Ali and Fletcher, (1978) also found
that glyphosate application caused reduction in plant height, leaf length, and shoot fresh
weight up to 62, 60, and 84% respectively in corn seedlings. The lowest concentration
of glyphosate (0.28kg/ha) inhibited plant growth more than the inhibition caused by
highest concenatration of amitrole (3.36 kg/ha). The root growth of plants treated with
1.12 kg/ha glyphosate was inhibited more than 80%, whereas with amitrole at 1.68 kg/ha
was 40%. Primary site of action of glyphosate in corn seedlings is in the roots whereas
the effect of amitrole is in the shoot.
Similarly Reddy et al. (2001) reported that in glyphosate-resistant soybean
glyphosate at the rate of 2.24 kg/ha, reduced shoot and root dry weight by 25 to 30%.
Nemat Alla et al., (2008a) reported that recommended field dose of metribuzin, butachlor
and chlorimuron-ethyl to 10-days-old wheat and maize seedlings differentially reduced
shoot fresh and dry weights. Acuna et al., (2009) studied the effect of herbicide, dose and
soil organic matter content using the bioassay technique where radicle length and fresh
weight of pre germinated seeds of Avena sativa were used as indicators. Increasing
herbicide dose Pendimethalin, Bensulide, Prodiamine and Dithiopyr caused significant
decrease in the radicle length but had no effect on fresh weight.
Patil et al., (2012) reported decrease in shoot length of plants, dry weight of
plant shoot after treatment of herbicides 2, 4- D amine salt, Roundup and Atrazine.
Michałowicz and Duda, (2009) found decrease in fresh weight, dry weight and shoot
length of 12 day old plants of reed canary grass leaves (Phalaris arudinacea) after
treatment of 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol (herbicide and fungicide).
Seedling vigour index, tolerance index and percentage of phytotoxicity were
determined in petri dish grown seedlings. In all Vigna mungo genotypes herbicide
treatment caused decrease in seedling vigour index and tolerance index while percentage
of phytoxicity increased with increasing herbicide dose. At 10 mM glyphosate
118
concentration, on the basis of tolerance index PU-19 and Azad-1 were more tolerant than
the other genotypes. Narain et al., (2012) found that lower concentration of tannery
effluent increased vigour index while decreased at higher concentrations in Cicer
arietinum. Increasing level of tannery effluent stress in Vigna mungo genotypes caused
increase in percent phytotoxicity (Indra and Mycin, 2009).
5.2 Morphological/Growth and Yield Parameters
In wire house experiment tolerance of three better performing genotypes of Vigna
mungo were studied in vivo. Detrimental effects of glyphosate were observed in form of
reduced survival percentage, plant height, number of nodes per plant, internodal length,
number of pods per plant and number of seeds per pod. At highest dose of glyphosate (8
mM), survival was not observed in any genotype while at 6 mM genotype PU-19 and
Azad-1 showed maximum and minimum survival percentage respectively. Plant height
was significantly reduced in all glyphosate treatment and in all genotypes. Maximum
plant height at 6 mM was found in PU-19 and minimum in Azad-1. Leaf necrosis and
chlorosis with curling of leaves was observed in 4 and 6 mM in all the three genotypes
and it was increased with the increase in days after treatment. The results of the present
study visibly revealed that glyphosate affects the overall growth and morphology of
plants, the effects persist even during the flowering and fruiting of plants and plants
could not endure high herbicide doses. In previous studies also it has been shown that
glyphosate affects plant morphology. Mahakavi et al., (2014) found that black gram
plants treated with quizalafop-p-ethyl (1 %, 1.5 and 2 %) showed significant decrease in
plant height. Yield attributing characters like number of pods/ plant, seeds/plant and
weight of 100 seeds were also decreased at 1 %, 1.5 and 2 %. Quizalafop-p-ethyl
treatment also decreased the photosynthetic pigments at 0.5 %, 1 %, 1.5 % and 2 % at 5
DAT, 10 DAT and 20 DAT over their respective controls. They observed that chl a, chl b
and carotenoid contents reached maximum in 15 days after flowering and rapidly
decreased after 33 days of flowering. According to Cole, (1985) chlorophyll level is
highly sensitive to glyphosate, and plants exposed to sublethal doses of the herbicide
have been found to show an achlorophyllous subsequent foliar growth. Glyphosate
concentrations as low as 10 µM cause more than 50% inhibition of seed germination. On
the contrary, a treatment with 2.4 mM to plantlets at the five-leaf stage does not inhibit
growth. There are several reports on deleterious effect of glyphosate on plant
morphology. Forlani and Racchi, (1995) found that herbicide glyphosate at a
concentration of 1.2 mM to plantlets at the three-leaf stage resulted in the onset of
119
damage symptoms like mild bleaching and slow development after one week of
treatment but in the next two weeks damage of seedlings was overcome and growth was
like control. Out of 11 inbred lines, treatment of 2.4 mM concentration caused complete
leaf necrosis in few lines after three weeks, while plantlets of other inbreds were much
less affected. Ozlem and Dane, (2007) used four different doses of Fusilade (0.25%,
0.5%, 1% and 1.5%) in (Fluazifop-p-butyl) Lens culinaris seeds and leaves. He reported
that shoot growth and lateral root growth was reduced in Fusilade treated groups and leaf
deformations like chlorosis, curling, expansion and asymmetry were observed. Santos et
al., (2005) demonstrated that glyphosate affects leaf growth and morphoanatomy of
Eucalyptus. The treatments were 0, 43.2, 86.4, 172.8 and 345.6 g a.e. glyphosate/ha,
applied 40 days after transplanting. Phytotoxicity in relation to the control was evaluated
7, 15, and 30 days after application (DAA). Wilting, chlorosis and curling were observed
in plant apices sprayed with 17.8 and 345.6 g a.e. glyphosate/ha. The treated plants also
showed abnormal branching and necrosis of the tissue.
During field testing of relative tolerance of genotypes, PU-19 and IPU-94-1
showed higher tolerance than Azad-1. Cowpea cultivars for bentazon tolerance in the
field were evaluated by Harrison and Fery, (1993) and they found that the most
susceptible selections were killed or severely injured by bentazon at 2 kg a.e. ha-1
; the
most tolerant selections were not severely injured by bentazon at 16 kg ha-1. Reduction
in seed number per pod in higher concentration of 0.375 kg a.i./ha in the pre-emergence
application of pendimethalin, pursuit plus and the early post emergence application of
pursuit plus in Vigna unguiculata was reported by Olorunmaiye, (2010).
Gilreath et al., (2000) reported that plant vigor declined with increased
glyphosate rates and younger plants were more sensitive than older plants. Plant height
decreased as glyphosate rate increased. Deeds et al., (2006) determined winter wheat
response to simulated drift rates of glyphosate and imazamox at early jointing or the
early flower stages of growth and found that wheat injury and yield loss increased as
herbicide rate was increased. This reduction was greater in case of glyphosate than
imazamox. Cerdeira et al., (1985) reported that treatment of cowpea plants with
glyphosate when pods were 7 and 10 days after flowering (DAF) prevented
accumulation of the major storage protein polypeptides. The accumulation of these
polypeptides was not inhibited as much when pods were 11, 12, or 13 DAF at the time of
treatment with glyphosate. Pod length and seed fresh weight were inhibited by
glyphosate treatment of plants bearing pods 7, 10, 11, and 12 DAF. Pod width, seed dry
120
weight, and seed length were inhibited by glyphosate when plants bearing pods 7, 10,
and 11 DAF were treated. Growth reduction of several plant species was reported after
the application of sulfonyl group herbicides, a group of Metosulam (Scarponi et al.,
1998; Yan et al., 2000). Norsworthy et al., (2001) studied the cause of differential
susceptibility of barnyardgrass, hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, and prickly sida to
glyphosate was examined. It was found that the biomass of barnyardgrass and prickly
sida was reduced by 95% by Roundup Ultra®. Hemp sesbania and pitted morning glory
showed more tolerance, with 66 and 51% average biomass reduction, respectively.
The present and other investigations show that glyphosate affects growth and
morphology of the plant, and remains in the plant till flowering and fruit set. However,
these studies do not tell if the phytotoxic effect is due to glyphosate or its degradation
metabolite, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA). Reddy et al., (2004) demonstrated
that glyphosate-resistant soybean (developed by integration of a foreign gene that coded
insensitive EPSP synthase) exposed to AMPA had reduced chlorophyll content and shoot
fresh weight, similar to glyphosate-isopropylammonium treatment.
5.3 Biochemical Parameters
Effect of glyphosate on biochemical parameters was studied in in vitro grown
seedlings of six genotypes and glyphosate treated plants of three genotypes grown in
wire house. Among studied biochemical parameters chlorophyll content, protein content
were decreased whereas proline content, MDA content and activity of antioxidative
enzymes CAT, POX and SOD were increased with the increasing herbicide
concentration.
5.3.1 Antioxidative Enzymes
On the basis of several reports (Fan et al., 2013, Romero et al., 2011, Sergiev et
al., 2006, Moldes et al., 2008,) where it was suggested that round up and its main
constituent glyphosate causes oxidative stress in plants and animals, we measured the
activity of three antioxidant enzymes, catalase and peroxidase and SOD after glyphosate
treatment. In both types of experiment, in vitro germination of seeds in herbicide
supplemented MS media and wire house experiment in which post emergence treatment
was given to young plants, activity of antioxidative enzymes was found increased in dose
dependent manner. Catalase activity was consistently increased in all treatments and
genotypes in in vitro grown seedlings while in treated plants Azad-1 showed a slight
decrease at 6 mM with respect to 4 mM. Peroxidase activity was increased consistently
in PU-19, PU-35, IPU-94-1 and PU-31 but slightly decreased at 0.8 mM in Azad-1 and
121
Azad-1 with respect to 0.6 mM. In treated plants also peroxidase activity was slightly
decreased at highest concentration 6 mM with respect to 4 mM. SOD activity also
increased in a similar manner in vitro grown seedlings except in PU-35 at 0.8 mM where
it was decreased with respect to control whereas in treated plants some what different
activity was observed. Among three genotypes PU-19 showed continuous increase up to
6 mM while in IPU-94-1 and Azad-1 activity was slightly decreased at 6 mM. Thus we
can conclude that herbicide exposure both in vivo and in vitro cause production of ROS
in treated seedlings and plants of Vigna mungo and hence elevation of antioxidative
defense system.
Oxidative damage induced by ROS, is prevented by elevation of the antioxidant
defense systems that operate with synchronized actions of a number of enzymes
including SOD, POD, and CAT. Increased production of .OH might generate O2
.- and
H2O2, and the SOD activity in black gram was increased as an antioxidant response to
protect the plants. Activities of these antioxidative enzymes system are related to the
plant resistance/tolerance, and eventually embodied in adjustment to adversity or
resistance induction of plants. SOD is the first stage enzyme that removes O2.- radicals
generated from normal physiological activities and exposure to oxidative stress (Bowler
et al., 1992). It can catalyze the disproportionation of two O2.- radicals to H2O2 and O2
and probably plays a key role in reducing toxic ROS accumulation (Salin, 1988). As an
effective reaction of antioxidant enzyme systems, induction of SOD usually coincided
with the increased activities of POD and CAT which are important H2O2 scavengers by
catalyzing H2O2 to water and oxygen.
Catalases are involved in the metabolism of oxidative stress causing herbicides
and protect plants from the stress generated by herbicide overdose. Catalases involved in
herbicide tolerance, or an increase in catalase activity during herbicide exposure, have
been reported from several plant species (Jung et al., 2006; Jung, 2003; Radetski et al.,
2000). Moldes et al., (2008) found that glyphosate caused slight increase in CAT activity
in susceptible cultivars of soyabean. Okuda et al., (1992) reported increase in catalase
activity by paraquat and cold treatment in wheat leaves. A few earlier reports have also
shown an increase in catalase activity in Vigna spp. after herbcicide exposure. A
herbicide 2-benzoxazolinone (BOA) was found to cause oxidative stress in mung bean
plants, which responded by an increase in the activity of ROS scavenging enzymes like
catalase and SOD in the root and leaf tissues (Batish et al., 2006). Sergiev et al., (2006)
demonstrated that catalase activity was increased after 6 and 10 days of glyphosate
122
application in maize plants. Lukatkin et al., (2013) reported that
aryloxyphenoxypropionate class herbicide TOPIK induced changes, predominantly
increases in lipid peroxidation (LPO) intensity, superoxide anion O2- generation, total
antioxidant activity (AOA), catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activity, although the
response by plants was nonlinear and depended on the herbicide concentration and
duration of treatment. As TOPIK concentration increased, so too did LPO and AOA in
leaves, confirming the presence of oxidative stress in the cells of all three cereals: winter
wheat, winter rye and maize.
Besides increasing catalase activity in plant tissues, glyphosate has been known
to induce catalase activity in animal tissues as well. Langiano and Martinez, (2008),
determined the toxicity of RoundUp for the Neotropical fish Prochilodus lineatus. Short-
term (6, 24 and 96 h) toxicity tests were performed to evaluate the effects of sub-lethal
concentrations of the herbicide (7.5 and 10 mg L− 1
) to P. lineatus. It was observed that
catalase activity in the fish liver was significantly increased in the fish exposed to 10 mg
L− 1
of the herbicide. This increase in activity was suggestive of the activation of
antioxidant defense after RoundUp exposure. Pieniazek et al., (2004) studied the effects
of exposure of human erythrocytes to different concentrations of Roundup Ultra 360 SL
and its active compound glyphosate. The human erythrocytes were incubated with 100–
1500 ppm of Roundup Ultra 360 SL and glyphosate. Both Roundup Ultra 360 SL and
glyphosate caused statistically significant increase in catalase activity in the erythrocytes.
Peroxidase is a general indicator of stress in plants and changes in peroxidase
activity could be used to analyse stress in plants. (Sprecher et al., 1993) An increase in
activity of peroxidase in response to glyphosate suggests the active participation of the
enzyme in scavenging reactive oxygen species under stressed conditions. Increase in
peroxidase activity was also found in Vigna radiata plants treated by glyphosate
(Basantani et al., 2011). The pattern of peroxidase activity induction in the six varieties
could again be explained in light of catalase activity elevation. The highly significant
induction of both the antioxidant enzymes in PU-19, PU-35 and IPU-94-1 suggests that
they are more capable to combat oxidative stress and thus under herbicide stress these
two enzymes are upregulated.
The protective role of both the antioxidant enzymes in other three genotypes,
however, does not seem to be sufficient to protect the plants from glyphosate injury.
Peroxidase, an antioxidant enzyme, has been clearly implicated in herbicide metabolism
in plants. Peroxidase upregulation after herbicide exposure has been demonstrated in
123
wheat (Wang and Zhou, 2006), tobacco (Yamato et al., 1994), and many other plant
species. Cañal et al., (1988) could demonstrate the activation of different peroxidase
isozymes at different glyphosate concentrations in Cyperus esculentus L. plants. They
identified three peroxidase species F1, F2 and F3 at pl 3.8, 4.4 and 4.8, respectively.
They showed preferential expression after glyphosate treatment. Highest F1 activity was
found in control plants whereas the F2 fraction was the predominant form in the plants
treated with glyphosate at 102M and the highest F3 activity occurred in plants treated
with 5 × 10-3
M glyphosate. Menezes et al., (2004) could differentiate glyphosate-tolerant
transgenic soybean from non-transgenic plants by the evaluation of peroxidase activity.
SODs are also known to play important role in herbicide tolerance in several
plant species. We also measured SOD activity in V. mungo seedlings after glyphosate
treatment. As compared to other oxidative enzymes SOD activity was not significantly
increased after glyphosate exposure in all genotypes. The increase in SOD activity also
suggests that glyphosate is inducing oxidative stress in V.mungo but SOD activity is
probably not playing a pivotal role in scavenging of superoxide radicals generated by
ROS. A similar increased SOD activity has also been observed after herbicide treatment
in several reports (Wang and Zhou, 2006; Jung et al., 2000). SOD activity is of more
importance because it acts as first line of defense against oxidative damage (Gratao et al.,
2005). Increased SOD activity catalyzes dismutation of O2- to O2 and H2O2 and this
increase may be due to synthesis of new enzyme proteins (Moldes et al., 2008).
Several workers have earlier reported an induction of SOD activity after
herbicide treatment. Matters and Scandalios, (1986) reported preferential induction of
chloroplsatic and cytosolic SOD in maize leaves treated with paraquat; mitochondrial
SOD was not induced significantly. The differential induction of SODs suggests that
different isozymic forms of the enzyme are involved in overcoming oxidative stress
generated by different herbicides. Perl et al., (1993) created transgenic potato plants
carrying either the cytosolic or the chloroplastic SOD genes of tomato. This study also
reported that cytosolic and chloroplastic SODs are instrumental in conferring tolerance to
paraquat.
The activities of SOD, POX, APX, and CAT were higher in the paraquat-resistant
biotype than in the paraquat-susceptible biotype after paraquat treatment in Erigeron
canadensis (Pyon et al., 2004). Doganlar, (2012) found that after treatment of herbicide,
quizalofop-p-ethyl in Lemna gibba and Lemna minor SOD and POD activities were
elevated in both plants at 24 h. but at 96 h, SOD activity decreased in L. minor.
124
Increasing diquat concentration decreased chlorophyll content while the activities of
SOD, POD, and CAT, cell membrane permeability, and MDA content increased
significantly while Roundup showed less change in chlorophyll content, activities of
SOD, POD, and CAT increased slowly in rapeseed pod (Zhou et al., 2009). Atrazine
treatment in maize roots caused significant increase in CAT, POX and SOD activities.
Žaltauskaitė and Brazaitytė, (2011) found that herbicide amidosulfuron caused
increase in MDA content in Chenopodium album and Hordeum vulgare but decrease in
chlorophyll and carotenoid content. Shahrtash et al., (2011) studied that herbicide
paraquat caused increase in proline content, catalase activity, MDA content but
decreased chlorophyll. Radetski et al., (2000) found that herbicide trichloroacetate
increased activity of superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase and glutathione
reductase. Choi et al., (2004) studied that paraquat causes increase in POX activity, total
SOD and CuZn-SOD activity but decrease in CAT activity in Rahmania glutinosa and
soybean. Janicka et al., (2008) found that 48 h after treatment of herbicide haloxyfop-
ethoxyethyl (HE) the SOD activity increased in the youngest part of the leaves and
decreased in the oldest. CAT activity increased in the part below the spot treated with
HE on 12 and 24 h after treatment. The increase in catalase activity in the wheat leaves
as a result of HE treatment is the plant’s reaction to the synthesis of hydrogen peroxide
and its further conversion into water and molecular oxygen. Decrease in chlorophyll
content and increase in peroxidase activity after treatment of sulphonyl urea herbicide
Sultan 70WG was reported by Sarsag and Unal, (2004). Herbicide roundup cause
increase in antioxidants in Schefflera leaf against oxidative damage. Activity of CAT,
POX and SOD was increased in leaves after roundup exposure but lipid peroxidation
decreased (Abdelkader and Ahmed, 2012).
De Souza et al., (2012) reported effect of herbicide mixture (ametryn and
clomazone) in Emilia coccinea and found that total chlorophyll content and carotenoids
decreased with increasing doses of the herbicides. The SOD activity decreased while
MDA content increased with increasing doses of herbicide. Song et al., (2007) reported
accumulation of proline in chlorotoluron (phenylurea herbicide) exposed roots and
leaves. Total activity of POD in roots was significantly enhanced while CAT activities
were generally reduced after chlorotoluron exposure. Çavuşoğlu et al., (2011) found that
glyphosate-exposure significantly reduced the germination percentage, root length and
seedling weight and enhanced the lipid peroxidation and caused an increase in
malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in Allium cepa. Rise in the activities of catalase,
125
guaiacol peroxidase, glutathione S-transferase and hydrogen peroxide was observed by
treatment of 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol (Michałowicz and Duda, 2009).
Hassan and Nemat Alla, (2005) reported that herbicide fluometuron significantly
reduced chlorophyll a and b contents and also caused significant inhibitions in activities
of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT). Nemat Alla and Hassan, (2007)
reported that in maize after isoproturon treatment SOD activity was significantly
enhanced up to the 12th d whereas APX activity was significantly reduced after the 4th
day onwards. CAT activities were similarly increased during the first 4 d but decreased
from the 12th and the 8th day, respectively. Low doses increased SOD and GPX activities
but high doses led to diminutions whereas CAT and APX were reduced by all doses.
Badr et al., (2013) found that metosulam herbicide decreased POD activity significantly
by increasing the concentration of herbicide and the duration but the activities of CAT
and APX increased significantly as the herbicide treatment increased.
It is concluded that herbicide treatment induced oxidative stress in Vigna mungo
and plant responde to the herbicide action via increased activity of antioxidative
enzymes. The relative tolerance of few genotypes in present study might be related to
elevation of antioxidative enzymes and increase in proline content.
5.3.2 Protein Content, Proline Content and MDA Content
In present investigation effect of herbicide on protein content varied according to
developmental stage of plant. In seedling stage a general decrease was observed after
glyphosate treatment whereas at plantlet stage (before flowering) protein content was
found to be increased with the increasing herbicide concentration.
Biotic or abiotic stress at the germination phase causes a decrease in normal
metabolic activities and consequent, reduction of growth. In this phase protein synthesis,
anabolic process like photosynthesis and transport of metabolites is badly affected. As
glyphosate inhibits amino acid metabolism by inhibiting shikimic acid pathway it also
showed profound effect on soluble protein content. In present study glyphosate treatment
prior to seed germination caused consistent decrease in protein content of treated
seedlings. Highest protein content was found in control and lowest in 0.8 mM. Maximum
decrease in protein content over control was observed in genotype Azad-2 whereas
minimum in IPU-94-1. Glyphosate treatment to young plants showed reverse effect on
protein content as it caused a general increase in protein content in all genotypes and all
the treatments. Highest protein content was at 4 mM in PU-19 and Azad-2 however at 6
mM in IPU-94-1. Increase in protein content might be due to increased synthesis of
126
antioxidative enzymes under herbicide stress. These results are in agreement with the
findings of El Tayeb and Zaki, (2009) who reported that roundup caused significant
decrease in soluble proteins in all concentrations and durations in stem leaves and roots
of Vicia faba. Reports regarding effect of glyphosate in animal systems also mention that
glyphosate had significant effect on total protein (El-Shebly and El-kady, 2008) while in
few reports there was increase in protein content after glyphosate treatment (Romero et
al., 2011). Decrease in grain protein by treatment of isoproturon and atrazine was
observed in greengram (Khan et al., 2006).
Inhibition of seed germination and decrease in protein content in root shoot axis
as well as endosperm of wheat seedlings by herbicide imazethapyr was found by Rad et
al., (2011). The results of impact of herbicides on protein are in line with effect of 2,4-D
and isoproturon on wheat (Kumar, 2012 ) as well as of Metribuzin, butachlor and
chlorimuron-ethyl on wheat and maize (Nemat Alla et al., 2008a) and of biocides in
lentil (Coskun and Zihnioglu, 2002), chlorimuron ethyl in wheat (Wang and Zhou,
2006). Metosulam treatment in Vicia faba decreased soluble proteins and free amino
acids content harshly in all organs in comparison with those of control plants after 12 and
24 h but proline content was increased (Badr et al., 2013). Hatzios and Howe, (1982)
found that hexozinone herbicide at 100 mM inhibited protein synthesis in soybean. Also,
Hamed, (1990) reported that metribuzin, treatment in faba bean plants, caused a marked
inhibitory effect on protein synthesis.
Pesticide endosulfan and its combination with kitazin were also found to decrease
protein content in brinjal (Sammaiah et al., 2011a). Rajashekhar et al., (2012) also found
that pendimethalin treatment in maize seedlings reduce soluble protein content. Dowidar
et al., (2010) reported decrease in total soluble protein after addition of butachlor and
thiobencarb at concentrations higher than 5 and 3 ppm, respectively, in culture media in
Nostoc muscorum. Thirumaran and Xavier, (1987) found an initial enhancement of
protein followed by a sharp decrease after treatment of methyl parathion (Metacid 50) in
black gram. Kumar, (2012) found that herbicides 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2, 4-
D) and Isoproturon (IPU) reduce the carbohydrate and protein content gradually from
lower to higher concentration of herbicides.
According to Hare and Cress, (1997) free proline accumulates in response to
various types of biotic and abiotic stresses. High proline levels under stress may maintain
NAD(P)+/NAD(P)H ratios at values compatible with metabolism under normal
conditions. Proline is a compatible solute and functions as osmoprotectant in drought and
127
osmotic stress and usually proline content is increased in all types of abiotic stresses.
Herbicide treatment also causes oxidative stress in plants so proline content was studied
in leaves and seedlings of black gram after post-emergence spray of various
concentrations of glyphosate.
Proline plays role in the osmotic adjustment (Rudulie et al., 1984; Zhang et al.,
2001), protects macromolecules during dehydration (Yancey et al., 1982) and act as a
hydroxyl radical scavenger (Smirnoff and Cumbes, 1989; Zhang et al., 2001). Proline
accumulation in plants under abiotic stresses is a major protective mechanism. In present
study, there was an enhanced level of proline biosynthesis under the glyphosate stress.
Accumulation of free proline and other osmolytes during biotic and abiotic stress is well
documented (Bohnert et al., 1995). Proline performs many functions under stress
conditions like osmotic adjustment (Voetberg and Sharp, 1991), osmoprotection (Kavi
Kishor et al., 1995), free radical scavenger and antioxidant (Sharma and Dietz, 2006),
protection of macromolecules from denaturation (Vanrensburg et al., 1993). Many
workers also reported increase in proline content after herbicide exposure. Huang et al.,
(2012) also found increase in proline content after roundup treatment in cagon grass.
Fayez et al., (2011) reported increased level of proline after salicylic acid + fusilade
treatments. Saladin et al., (2003a) reported accumulation of amino acid proline after soil
treatment of flumioxazin in Vitis vinifera. El Tayeb and Zaki, (2009) reported significant
increase in proline content after roundup treatment in Vicia faba.
MDA formation is considered the general indicator of lipid peroxidation so MDA
content measurement is the most applicable method to assess lipid peroxidation, the
accumulation of MDA suggests lipid peroxidation in plants (Li et al., 2012). MDA levels
were significantly increased in the leaves of Vigna mungo with an increase in glyphosate
concentration. Highest MDA content was found at 6 mM glyphosate treatment and
maximum amount was found in PU-19 and minimum in IPU-94-1. Enhanced MDA
content indicated lipid peroxidation in response to herbicide induced oxidative stress as
reported by Nemat and Alla, (2005). Wang and Zhou, (2006) reported that herbicide
chlorimuron-ethyl increased MDA content in leaves after 1 day exposure. Many reports
are in accordance with our study (Moldes et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2009; Çavuşoğlu,
2011; Romero et al., 2011). Moldes et al., (2008) reported that glyphosate treatment did
not induce oxidative stress to any great extent due to lack of significant increase in lipid
peroxidation after 72 hours of treatment. Glyphosate treatment decreased growth and
pigment content of maize plants and increased lipid peroxidation, free proline and the
128
activity of CAT, peroxidase and glutathione-S-transferase (Sergiev et al., 2006). Shan-
guo et al., (2008) noticed that isoproturon and tribenuron-methyl had obvious inhibitory
action on the increment of root and seedling weights. Isoproturon inhibited root activity
by 65.26% and increased MDA content by 42.39%. Tribenuron-methyl (1.0 mg/ml)
inhibited root activity by 32.83% and at 0.2 mg/ml, it increased MDA content by
27.41%. Zhou et al., (2009) reported that Roundup caused no obvious increase in MDA
content.
5.3.3 Pigments (Chlorophyll and Carotenoids)
Effect of glyphosate treatment on photosynthetic pigments was studied in wire
house experiment. Chlorophyll and carotenoids were decreased with increasing
concentration of herbicides in all genotypes. Visual injury of leaves mainly consisted of
chlorosis of leaf tissue caused by glyphosate treatment in black gram. Depending on
dose, chlorosis was more in higher concentrations. There was dose dependent decrease in
total chlorophyll, chl a, chl b and carotenoids in all the treatments and genotypes.
Minimum total chlorophyll content at 6 mM was found in Azad-1 and maximum in PU-
19. Similar symptoms have been reported for wheat (Deeds et al., 2006). Chlorosis is
believed to be caused by destruction of chlorophyll and other accessory pigments.
Chlorophyll content is proposed as a very useful parameter of herbicide toxicity and
usually decreased after application of herbicides (Clua et al., 2012; Hernando et al.,
1989; Reddy et al., 2001). Meschede et al., (2011) reported that the application of
glyphosate and sulfumeturon methyl at higher doses were found to interfere in the
carotenoid content, when compared with the control. The highest dose of glyphosate
significantly reduced the content of chlorophyll and carotenoid in sugarcane. The
changes observed in the chlorophyll and carotenoid levels caused by the application of
the herbicides may distinctly alter the metabolism of photosynthesis by absorbtion and/or
conversion of energy.
Decreased amount of leaf chlorophyll is an important feature of plants treated
with sublethal concentrations of glyphosate (Tan et al., 2006). Glyphosate inhibits the
enzymatic activity of cytochrome P450 of yeast, suggesting a similar action in plants
(Xiang et al., 2005). Furthermore, glyphosate may also prevent chlorophyll synthesis by
inhibiting the formation of the porphyrin precursor δ-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) (Zaidi
et al., 2005). The reduction of chlorophyll content due to plants exposure to herbicides
was also reported by Wang and Zhou, (2006) in wheat. Huang et al., (2012) reported
significant decrease in chl a and chl b after glyphosate treatment in cogon grass. Saladin
129
et al., 2003(b) also reported negative impact on photosynthesis revealed by reduction in
foliar chlorophyll and carotenoid contents. Jung, (2000) found that in the norflurazon
treated plants of cucumber, there was a reduction in total chlorophylls and carotenoids.
Reddy et al., (2001) found that in glyphosate susceptible soyabean a single
application of glyphosate at 0.28 kg/ha reduced chlorophyll content (49%), and shoot
and root dry weight (50 and 57%, respectively) at 2 wk after treatment. In glyphosate-
resistant, only higher dose 2.24 kg/ha reduced chlorophyll content and shoot and root dry
weight. Increasing application of glyphosate on shoots significantly reduced chlorophyll
concentration of the young leaves and shoots dry weight, particularly the young parts of
non-glyphosate resistant soybean plants (Cakmak et al., 2009). UV-B (0.4 W m-2)
irradiation and dimethoate (100 and 200 ppm) treatments, singly and in combination,
declined the growth, photosynthetic pigment contents and photosynthesis (O2 evolution
and CO2-fixation) of cowpea (Mishra et al., 2008). Dimethoate (100 and 200 ppm) and
UV-B alone caused heavy damage on pigments and photosynthetic activity of cowpea,
leading to the significant inhibition in growth.
Hernando et al., (1989) reported that glyphosate decreased cell density and
photosynthetic pigment content; 1.0 mM did not allow growth in Chlorella pyrenoidosa.
Glyphosate causes inhibition of chlorophyll synthesis and a decrease in carotenoids.
Villanueva et al., (1985) found that after 2 weeks of foliar spray of glyphosate (at 0.1,
1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 mM) growth was inhibited, and chlorosis and leaf apex necrosis were
observed. Plant height was reduced, leaf fresh weight was decreased by 40%, and leaf
dry weight was slightly affected. Chlorophyll and carotenoid levels were decreased by 52
and 54%, respectively, following glyphosate treatment.
Glyphosate caused significant reduction in the chlorophyll and carotenoids
content of purple nutsedge leaves (Abu-Irmaileh and Jordan, 1978). Ralph, (2000) found
that photosynthetic pigments chl-a and chl-b were significantlly reduced by glyphosate
but there was no significant effect on carotenoid concentration. Alvi et al., (2003) found
that increasing concentrations of atrazine decrease the contents of chlorophyll a,
chlorophyll b and carbohydrates, which reflects its effectiveness as a photosynthetic
inhibitor. Potassium and protein contents were decreased significantly at 10 to 100 ppm
atrazine. Chen et al., (2012a) reported combined effects of UV-B radiation and
herbicides glyphosate, MCPA and DCMU in forming cyanobacteria, Anabaena sp. and
Microcystis viridis. Glyphosate and MCPA significantly decreased the contents of Chl-a
and carotenoid contents in irradiated cells. The addition of GPS and MCPA decreased
130
SOD activity, and increased DNA damage, ROS generation and MDA content. Romero
et al. (2011) found that glyphosate increased protein and malondialdehyde (MDA)
content and CAT and SOD activity. There was reduction in carotenes, total chlorophyll,
and chla/b ratio on increasing concentrations of glyphosate in tolerant strain of Chlorella
kessleri. Chlorophylls a and b and carotenoids of plant leaves decreased significantly
with increasing concentration of metosulam in Vicia faba (Badr et al., 2013). Reduction
of pigment content in the presence of herbicide occurred either by initiation of pigment
degradation or by inhibition or biosynthesis of either chlorophylls or carotenoids
(Nakajima et al., 1996). Herbicide atrazine and glyphosate were also found to reduce
pigment content in algae (Ahmed et al., 2000; Fawzy, 2008).
5.4 Effect of Glyphosate on Plant Tissue Culture
In vitro culture for selection of stress tolerant genotypes had been widely used in
many crop plants for various abiotic stress like salinity, drought or/and osmotic stress,
heavy metal stress and other stress caused by other agrochemicals and pesticides (Table
2.1). But there are very few reports regarding in vitro screening of herbicide tolerant
genotypes in any pulse crop, especially in Vigna mungo. Two best callusing media (A)
and (C) were chosen from several combinations of PGRs to screen tolerant genotypes on
the basis of performance of six genotypes on herbicide supplemented callus media. In
callus media (A) among four explants used for callusing cotyledonary node was most
superior followed by hypocotyl, epicotyl and shoot apex. Genotypes that showed
callusing response at higher concentration 0.2 mM viz. PU-19, PU-35, IPU-94-1 and
Azad-1 were treated as more tolerant than those genotypes that did not showed response
viz. PU-31 and Azad-2. Callus fresh weight (CFW) after 30 DAI was also used as an
important parameter to assess the relative tolerance of genotypes for herbicide. CFW was
decreased in all explants of all genotypes with increase in herbicide. Among explants,
maximum and minimum CFW was obtained in CN and shoot apex respectively. At 0.2
mM maximum CFW was found in IPU-94-1 followed by PU-19, Azad-1 and PU-35.
In callus media (C) good callusing responses was found for all explants like leaf
segments, cotyledonary node (CN) and hypocotyl but CN were best for callusing in this
combination too. Here only IPU-94-1 showed callusing response at 0.4 mM whereas at
0.2 mM maximum percent callus response was maximum in PU-19 followed by IPU-94-
1 and Azad-1. CFW at 0.2 mM was highest in Azad-1 and PU-19. Thus on the basis of
callus response in both media PU-19, IPU-94-1 and Azad-1 were treated as tolerant as
compared to other three genotypes.
131
In present study herbicide glyphosate showed an inhibitory effect on callus and
shoot culture of all Vigna mungo genotypes and on the basis of their overall performance
under herbicide stress they were categorized under tolerant and sensitive ones. When
herbicides were incorporated in tissue culture media it produced inhibitory effect on
percent response, shoot number per explant, shoot length, callus growth and callus fresh
weight in all genotypes but genotypic variation was observed for morphogenetic
response. Percent response, shoot number per explant, shoot length, callus growth and
callus fresh weight were decreased in a dose dependent manner in all explants,
genotypes, and treatments in shoot media (D), (H), (I). In shoot media-(D) cultures at
0.05 mM, maximum percent shoot response was recorded in Azad-1 while minimum in
PU-35 whereas shoot number per explant was highest in genotype IPU-94-1 and lowest
in PU-19.
Similar inhibition has been reported in chickpea with using Endosulfan (Saxena
and Beg, 1988) and with Rogor (Rao and Naidu, 1989) incorporated in growth medium.
Tolerance of wheat genotypes to the sulfonylurea herbicide metsulfuron-methyl was
studied using in vitro culture by Kondic-Spika et al., (2009). The study recommended
that fresh callus weight was the best for screening tolerant from sensitive genotypes.
Presence of metsulfuron-methyl in the medium had an inhibitory effect on callus growth
in all wheat genotypes. Validity of the tolerance level expressed by FCW was confirmed
at the level of whole plants in in situ experiment. Effect of agrochemicals on callus
cultures of plants were studied by many researchers like difenzoquat and atrazine
(Bozorgipour and Snape, 1991), sulfonylurea (Kondic and Šesek, 1998; Kondic-Špika et
al., 2007) and dicamba (Kilinc, 2004.) Other stresses like osmotic stress also effect
relative callus growth rate and shoot induction. With the increase in PEG concentration
relative callus growth rate and shoot induction decreased (Aazami et al., 2010).
Sammaiah et al., (2011b) reported that the growth of brinjal callus with regard to fresh
and dry weight and percentage of callus induction for three pesticides Rogor, Endosulfan
and Kitazin were inversely correlated with increasing concentrations. Koch et al., (2009)
reported screening of herbicide resistant populations by spraying sugarcane seedlings
with 0-1.5 l/ha Arsenal. They also found that sugarcane callus cells exposed to 0.042μM
imazapyr cause 50% inhibition of plantlet regeneration. Kilinc, (2004) found that
dicamba effect callus induction rate and callus fresh weight in wheat genotypes. He
suggested that usage of the dicamba concentrations higher or lower than 5mg-l decreased
the callus induction rate and increase in dicamba concentration from 5 to 10 mg-l
132
decreased the callus weight. Bird, (1993) reported increase in percent branch reduction
by herbicides 2,4-D, atrazine and glyphosate in vitro cultures of Myriophyllum spicatum.
Herbicide atrazine reduced fresh weight gain and this reduction was less at lower
trifluralin concentrations in carrot callus tissue (Sloan and Camper, 1981).
Nedev et al., (2003) screened maize genotypes for herbicide resistance by in
vitro selection by adding Stomp 330 (pendimetalin) by culture of immature maize
embryos. Pendimetalin concentrations of 0.26%, 0.10% and 0.05% showed a negative
effect on callus induction and reduced in vitro growth rates. Herbicide (Stomp 330)
resistant maize calli were obtained using the method of in vitro selection of mutant cells.
The resistance persisted at a concentration of 0.01%.
Fresh weight of cultured cells of tobacco was found to decrease in presence of
glyphosate by Dyer et al., (1988). Baillie et al., (1993) also found that increasing
chlorosulfuron concentration in barley callus culture reduce growth and quality of callus.
Root and plant dry weight of in vitro selected lines were also decreased by
chlorosulfuron. In vitro culture of barley callus has been used to produce plants with
increased glyphosate tolerance. Callus from immature embryos of barley Hordeum
vulgare L. were cultured on Murashige and Skoog medium with 10-6
, 10-5
, 10-4
, 5×10-4
,
10-3
, or 10-2
M glyphosate for one, four or thirty months. Plants were regenerated from
callus maintained in glyphosate medium at 10-6
, 10-5
or 10-4
M for four months, at 10-5
or
5×10-4
M for one month and at 10-5
M for thirty months. The progeny of each regenerated
plant was analyzed for response to glyphosate. Some progenies showed increased
tolerance to glyphosate (Escorial et al., 1996).
Atrazine-resistant plants were regenerated from cells selected in green cultures of
Nicotiana plumbaginifolia (Cseplo et al., 1985). In another study, cotyledonary node plus
epicotyl explants of soybean were cultured on atrazine-containing medium. Some
explants yielded organogenic shoots from which plants were regenerated. Some of these
plants displayed resistance to atrazine (Wrather and Freytag, 1991). Calli of Nicotiana
debneyi displaying very high levels of tolerance to amitrole were selected by stepwise
exposure to increasing concentrations. Regenerated plants displayed tolerance as calli
(Swartzberg et al., 1985). Amitrole tolerance at the whole plant level was reported in
tobacco plants regenerated from cell lines selected in vitro (Chaleff, 1986b). A similar
result was achieved with maize (Anderson et al., 1987). Chen et al., (2012b) developed
protocol of in vitro selection and greenhouse screening for glyphosate-tolerant variants in
manilagrass. Newly subcultured calli of more than 5 years’ old were transferred to
133
selection medium containing 2 mM glyphosate. After two rounds of selection, survived
calli were transferred to regeneration medium without glyphosate. Regenerated plantlets
were then transferred to regeneration medium containing 0.5 mM glyphosate to select
tolerant plantlets. Fully developed plantlets were transferred to a green house and then
subjected to greenhouse screening by foliar spraying with 0.05 % glyphosate solution.
Six glyphosate-tolerant plantlets were obtained and proliferated for determination of
SOD-tolerance using morphological and physiological measurements. Fourteen days
after foliar application with 0.1 % glyphosate, only TP5 showed enhanced SOD-
tolerance, higher chlorophyll a content and catalase activity.
Harms et al., (1991) developed procedure for the rapid and direct selection of
herbicide-resistant mutant plants. In this procedure adventitious shoot formation from
suitable explants, such as leaf discs, on a shoot-inducing culture medium containing a
toxic herbicide concentration. Resistant green shoots were thus isolated from tobacco
leaf explants cultured on medium containing 100 μgl−1
primisulfuron. Their
acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) enzyme activity was less inhibited by sulfonylurea
herbicides than that of unselected, sensitive wild type plants.
Herbicide tolerant callus and suspensions cell culture of rice were selected by
Wei, (1998). Rice callus was induced from immature seeds on basal MS solid medium
supplemented with 10 µM 2, 4-D and finely dispersed cell suspension cultures were
initiated from the callus using B5 basal liquid medium consisting of 10 µM 2, 4-D.
During the stressing and selecting stages, 2, 4-D was observed to be taken up by the rice
callus and suspension cells. In the selection and toxicity studies, 2, 4-D-tolerant callus
cultivar Puteh Perak was selected in MS solid media at 400, 600 and 800 µM 2, 4-D
concentration while tolerant cell-suspension in basal B5 liquid media containing 200 and
400 µM 2, 4-D. Instantaneous and gradual stressing method both were used for herbicide
tolerant callus and suspensions cell culture. Sunflower genotypes differed regarding their
response of callus viability in presence of herbicide glyphosate and callus viability
decreased with increasing herbicide concentration (Raducanu, 2004). Reduction in callus
fresh weight in rice variety KDML 105 by 10-4
M glyphosate were also reported by Cha-
um et al., (1999).
Seeds of fourteen tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars were
germinated under 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 mM NaCl. According to their germination response,
six cultivars were selected as: salt-tolerant (Pascal and Tnshet Star), moderately salt-
tolerant (Imperial and Tnshet Crystal) and salt sensitive (Pahuja and Queen). Explants
134
from hypocotyls of these cultivars were selected for callus induction. About 0.2 g of
callus was grown under previous salt levels for four weeks. Callus relative growth rate
(RGR), fresh and dry weights, proline, Na+ and K
+ contents were evaluated. Significant
differences were found among cultivars. Tnshet Star had the highest callus growth, while
Pahuja had the lowest under salt levels during the incubation period; high salinity
resulted in lowering callus fresh and dry weights of callus as well as reducing its RGR
(Mohammed et al., 2006).
In stepwise selection and procedure we aimed to screen tolerant genotype and
select callus tolerant to higher dose of glyphosate. Stepwise selection method was also
used by Tong et al., (2010) in Gossypium hirsutum L. to obtain glyphosate-tolerant
upland cotton mutant from the embryogenic calli. The calli were transferred to the
selection medium and multi-step selection pressure process was performed until the calli
could proliferate in the presence of 20 mM glyphosate. The regenerated plants from the
glyphosate-tolerant calli were analysed for glyphosate response, tolerance of progenies
and shikimate accumulation on whole-plant basis.
135
6.0 Conclusions
The present study was carried out with the objective of investigating in vitro
methods that can be used for screening of herbicide tolerance in Vigna mungo genotypes.
During the course of investigation effect of glyphosate was seen on growth and
morphological parameters of seedlings and young plants, callus induction, callus growth,
multiple shoots and shoot bud induction and root proliferation in different seedling
explants in six V. mungo genotypes. Effect of glyphosate on biochemical parameters like
pigments, protein content, proline content and MDA content were also studied in in vitro
grown seedlings and field grown plants. Activity of antioxidative enzymes viz. catalase,
peroxidase and SOD were also studied.
The present investigation clearly demonstrated that glyphosate significantly
affected morphological and biochemical parameters of seedlings and young plants of
Vigna mungo genotypes. The effect of the herbicide was evaluated both on petridish
raised seedlings as well as in in vitro grown seedlings. Glyphosate concentrations
ranging from 0.1 mM (in vitro germination) to 10 mM (petri dish germination) reduced
germination, survival, root length, shoot length and fresh weight and dry weight of
seedlings in all the genotypes in a dose dependent manner which showed adverse impact
of glyphosate application on non target crop black gram. Among all the parameters used
for screening of herbicide tolerant genotypes, germination percentage, survival
percentage and seedling root length were found best. On the basis of germination
percentage at 10 mM, from higher to lower GP, genotypes could be arranged as Azad-1>
PU-19>PU-35>IPU-941 >PU-31=Azad-2. In in vitro germination at highest glyphosate
concentration (0.8mM) from higher to lower GP, genotypes could be arranged as PU-
19> IPU-94-1>Azad-1>PU-35>Azad-2>PU-31. EC50 for germination percentage was
different in different genotypes. It was 0.8 mM for PU-19, IPU-94-1 and Azad-1, 0.4
mM for PU-35 and PU-31and 6mM for Azad-2. Survival percentage calculated for petri
dish grown seedlings at highest glyphosate concentration (10 mM) was higher in PU-19,
Azad-1 and IPU-94-1 than PU-35, PU-31 and Azad-2. Survival percentage for in vitro
grown seedlings at highest glyphosate concentration (0.8 mM) was highest in PU-19 and
lowest in PU-31. These findings clearly indicate that PU-19, Azad-1 and IPU-94-1 were
better able to withstand higher glyphosate doses as compared to other genotypes.
136
Percent reduction in root length in petri dish grown seedlings with respect to
control in highest dose (10 mM) was PU-19 (91.96), PU-35 (93.87), IPU-94-1 (90.91),
PU-31 (94.58), Azad-1 (91.77) and Azad-2 (95.21). Percent reduction (%) with respect
to control in highest dose 0.8 mM was PU-19 (87.92), PU-35 (89.26), IPU-94-1(86.67),
PU-31(93.39), Azad-1(88.73) and Azad-2 (89.45). This clearly indicates the relative
tolerance among genotypes and we can conclude that the genotypes with less inhibition
at highest glyphosate concentration can better tolerate the herbicide stress. Almost
similar was observed in in vitro grown seedlings.
Effect of glyphosate on in vitro response of various explants like
hypocotyl, epicotyl, cotyledonary node, shoot apex and leaf segments were also assessed
during study and it was observed that glyphosate negatively effects callus induction,
callus growth, induction of multiple shoots, shoot buds and roots. With the increase in
glyphosate concentration there was gradual decrease in percent callus response and
callus fresh weight in both combinations (callus media A and C) tested for callusing in
all explants of six genotypes. Three shoot media D, H and I were used to assess effect of
herbicide on shoot induction and shoot growth. In all shoot media percent shoot
response, number of shoots per explant and shoot length was decreased with the
increasing herbicide concentration in all explants of six genotypes. Similar response was
observed for rooting in root media. On the basis of over all in vitro response of explants
of genotypes in herbicide supplemented media IPU-94-1, Azad-1 and PU-19 were found
tolerant, PU-35 was moderately tolerant and Azad-2 and PU-31 were sensitive for high
concentration of herbicide.
Three tolerant and better performing genotypes were subjected to gradual and
shock treatment of herbicide and on the basis of percent of surviving cultures and callus
tolerance index, IPU-94-1 and PU-19 was more tolerant as compared to Azad-1. On the
basis of callus growth and percent of surviving cultures it was concluded that shock
treatment of herbicide stress caused more inhibition on callus growth as compared to
gradual treatment in all three genotypes.
In vivo response of IPU-94-1, Azad-1 and PU-19 to herbicide was also evaluated
in field under wire house conditions. After post emergence spray of herbicide to young
plants, effect of herbicide was observed on survival percentage, plant height, number of
nodes, internodal length, number of pods, pod length, number of seeds per pod, number
of seeds per plant. All the growth and yield parameters were found to decrease with the
increasing concentration of herbicide. Among biochemical parameters activity of
137
catalase, peroxidase and SOD, proline content, total protein content and MDA content
were increased while total chlorophyll, chl-a, chl-b and carotenoids were decreased with
the increase in herbicide dose. Thus on the basis of response of three genotypes in wire
house, it was concluded PU-19 can better tolerate the herbicide toxicity as compared to
IPU-94-1 and Azad-1.
In conclusion, germination percentage, survival percentage and root length
bioassay, percent callus/shoot response and reduction in callus fresh weight can be
utilized for the selection of herbicide tolerant genotypes in Vigna mungo as well as other
crop plants. Among in vitro methods used for screening, in vitro germination method and
gradual stress treatment methods were found better for screening of herbicide tolerant
genotypes than other methods in Vigna mungo. Glyphosate application caused oxidative
stress and elevation of antioxidant defense system in non target crop black gram.
Genotypes PU-19, IPU-94-1 and Azad-1 can better combat the oxidative stress than PU-
31, PU-35 and Azad-2 induced by glyphosate application which may be utilized in
Vigna mungo improvement programme as well as they can be used for study of
molecular basis of herbicide resistance in these genotypes in contrast to susceptible
genotypes.
138
7.0 Summary
Herbicides are expected to protect crop plants from weed competition without
harming the crop plants. Glyphosate (N-[Phosphonomethyl] glycine) is a non selective
systemic herbicide used for control of annual and perennial plants including grasses,
sedges, broad leaved weeds and woody plants. But broad spectrum herbicides like
glyphosate can also damage non target plants. Black gram is one such non target crop
and therefore, it becomes necessary to select ideal black gram genotypes, which may be
tolerant to herbicide stress and produce substantial yield under stress conditions.
In present study an attempt has been made to investigate in vitro methods that can
be used to screen herbicide tolerant genotypes of black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper).
Black gram is a valuable field crop, both in terms of economic returns and in its
contribution to total farm income as a leguminous rotation crop. It is a member of the
Asiatic Vigna crop group. It is a warm season annual pulse grown mostly as an
opportunity crop in rotation with cereals. Black gram's main advantages are that, being a
legume, it does not require nitrogen fertilizer application, and has a relatively short (90-
120 days) growth duration. It is an important food legume crop of the Indian
subcontinent comprising of India, Burma, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. Its seeds are
highly nutritious with protein (25-26%), carbohydrates (60%), fat (1.5%), minerals,
amino acids and vitamins. In India black gram is very popularly grown in Andhra
Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Punjab,
Haryana, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. Black gram is considered to have been
domesticated in India from its wild ancestral form V.mungo var. silvestris. Black gram is
a specialized food crop used primarily in South Asia for dhal production. Seeds are used
in preparation of many south Indian dishes, e.g. dosa, idli, vada etc. It is cultivated
mainly for forage, silage and edible seeds. It is also used as a green manure crop and, in
some parts of the world, as a fodder crop.
Glyphosate is a post-emergent, systemic and non-selective herbicide used in both
agricultural and non-agricultural areas. It is used to kill all plant types including grasses,
perennials, and woody plants. There are different forms of glyphosate used as herbicides:
glyphosate trimethylsulfonium salt, glyphosate-isopropylammonium salt and glyphosate-
sesquiodium. It is sold under various trade names by different companies, some of which
139
are Accord®, Fallow Master
®, Glyphomax
®, Honcho
®, MirageR
®, Pondmaster
®,
Protocol®
, Roundup Ultra®, Roundup Pro
®, Silhouette
®, Touchdown
®, etc. It is mainly
absorbed into the plant through the leaves and then transported throughout the plant
where it acts on the plant’s enzyme system. It acts as a potent inhibitor of shikimic acid
pathway for biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids. It is a competitive inhibitor of 5-
enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase with respect to
phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and noncompetitive with respect to shikimate-3-phosphate
(S3P).
Investigations regarding herbicide tolerance in Vigna mungo are very few and to
the best of our knowledge there is also no report on in vitro screening for herbicide
tolerance in black gram caused by glyphosate herbicide. The objective of the present
work was therefore to investigate in vitro methods of screening for herbicide tolerant
black gram genotypes. Genotypes under study are high yielding and widely used in
North India specially Uttar Pradesh where glyphosate is used on large extent to eradicate
weed populations.
Abiotic stress caused by herbicides has become a major limiting factor for crop
productivity in present scenario. To combat this problem screening of herbicide tolerant
genotypes became an efficient approach which needs to rely on appropriate methodology
for screening of various genotypes. Many methodologies have been proposed by
different researchers time to time to obtain herbicide tolerance in important crops. These
methods can be classified in two groups: in vitro and in vivo methods.
Seeds of six genotypes PU-19, PU-35, IPU-94-1, PU-31, Azad-1 and Azad-2
were grown in petri dishes after 24 hour treatment of herbicide glyphosate for 15 days.
The data was taken on various seedling growth parameters. Seeds were also grown in
herbicide supplemented MS basal media (0.1 mM, 0.2 mM, 0.4 mM, 0.6 mM and 0.8
mM) for 15 days and seedling growth parameters were calculated. Biochemical
parameters like free proline and total protein content, activity of antioxidative enzymes
like catalase, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase were also estimated. In another
screening method various seedling explants of six genotypes viz. epicotyl, hypocotyl,
cotyledonary node, shoot apex and leaf segments were obtained from in vitro grown
seedlings and inoculated on MS media augmented with PGRs and various concentrations
of herbicide (0.01 mM, 0.05 mM, 0.1 mM, 0.2 mM and 0.4 mM). Effect of herbicide on
callusing, shooting and rooting response was analyzed in different genotypes of black
gram after 30 and 45 days after inoculation. In callus culture screening, calluses were
140
subjected to shock and gradual treatment of herbicide and response were analyzed in
terms of percent of surviving cultures and tolerance index. Seeds of three better
performing genotypes were also grown in wire house and post emergence treatment of
glyphosate (control, 1 mM, 2 mM, 4 mM, 6 mM and 8 mM) was given at three leaved
stage of seedlings. Effect of herbicide on various morphological and physiological
parameters was assessed.
Effect of herbicide on seedling growth parameters, antioxidative enzymes and
other biochemical parameters
In petri dish and in vitro seed germination experiment it was observed that
glyphosate treatment reduce germination percentage, survival percentage, root length,
shoot length, fresh weight and dry weight in all the six genotypes but genotypes behaved
differentially for the herbicide. In petri dish grown seedlings all the growth parameters
were decreased in dose dependent manner. In control maximum germination percentage
were obtained in IPU-94-1 and minimum in PU-31 and Azad-2. At highest dose (10
mM) maximum percent decrease over control in germination percentage in PU-35 and
Azad-2 while minimum in Azad-1. Survival percentage at 10 mM was maximum in PU-
19 and minimum in Azad-2 and PU-31. Seedling root length was most sensitive for
herbicide among all the parameters studied. Highest root length was observed in control
and maximum in PU-19 and minimum in Azad-2 and at 10 mM PU-19 and Azad-2 had
highest and lowest root length respectively. The fresh weight of control seedlings and
also at 10 mM was highest in PU-19 and minimum in Azad-2. Maximum and minimum
reduction of fresh weight at 10 mM was observed in PU-31 and PU-35. The dry weight
of control seedlings and at 10 mM was highest in PU-19 and minimum in Azad-2. The
maximum seedling tolerance index was observed in control and minimum in 10 mM.
As compared to peridish germination method, in vitro germination in MS media
supplemented with herbicide showed clear relative tolerance among genotypes for the
herbicide glyphosate and it could be considered as better and more sensitive method of
screening for herbicide tolerance among various cultivars growing naturally.
Catalase activity increased with the increasing herbicide concentration in all
genotypes. It was lowest in control and highest in 0.8 mM. In control, activity was
highest in Azad-1 and lowest in PU-35. At 0.8 mM maximum activity was in PU-19
while lowest in PU-31. It was assumed that to overcome the oxidative stress caused by
glyphosate, catalases might be playing a pivotal role in Vigna mungo genotypes. The
protective role of catalase in PU-31 and Azad-1 was not sufficient enough to protect the
141
plants from herbicide injury as shown by survival percentage and seedling root length in
PU-19. The induced catalase activity in PU-19 and IPU-94-1 might be playing a
supportive role causing less damaging symptoms at higher doses.
Like catalase, peroxidase activity was also increased with increase in herbicide
concentration in all genotypes. It was lowest in control seedlings and among genotypes it
was maximum in PU-19 and minimum in PU-35. The peroxidase activity was highest at
0.8 mM, highest in IPU-94-1, and lowest in Azad-1.
As compared to other oxidative enzymes SOD activity was not significantly
increased after glyphosate exposure. From control to 0.6 mM it was increased but after
that decrease was observed except in PU-19, Azad-1 and Azad-2 where it increased. The
SOD activity at 0.8 mM was highest in PU-19 and lowest in PU-35. The increase in SOD
activity also suggests that glyphosate is inducing oxidative stress in V.mungo.
Glyphosate caused decrease in protein content of in vitro grown seedlings in all
the treatment and in all the genotypes. Maximum protein content was in control and
value was highest for Azad-1 followed by IPU-94-1 and PU-35 while lowest for Azad-2.
Maximum percent reduction over control at 0.8 mM was in Azad-2 while minimum was
obtained in IPU-94-1.
Effect of herbicide on in vitro response of explants on callusing, shoot and root
media
Callusing response was observed in various explants in callus media (A-NAA-
0.5+BAP-1.0 mg/l) and (C-NAA-1.5+BAP-1.0 mg/l) supplemented with herbicide.
Cotyledonary node was most superior for callus induction followed by hypocotyl, leaf
segments, epicotyl and shoot apex. In callus media (A) for cotyledonary explants, in
control maximum callus response was found in IPU-94-1 and minimum in Azad-2. In
control highest CFW was recorded in PU-19 and lowest in PU-31 whereas at 0.2 mM
lowest CFW was found in PU-35 and highest in IPU-94-1. Reduction in callus fresh
weight (RCFW) appears to be a good screening parameter for assessment of tolerant
genotypes in black gram. Percent reduction in callus fresh weight in comparison of
control increased in a dose dependent manner. At 0.4 mM complete reduction was
observed as no callus formed even after 30 days in any genotype. Genotype PU-31 and
Azad-2 showed 100% reduction in 0.2 mM whereas IPU-94-1 scored least reduction in
CFW.
In hypocotyl explants, callusing was observed up to 0.05 mM in all genotype but
in 0.1 mM only Azad-1 and Azad-2 showed callusing while at 0.2 mM PU-19 and Azad-
142
2 showed some callusing. Percent callus response and callus growth decreased with
increase in glyphosate concentration. In control, genotypes PU-35, IPU-94-1, PU-31 and
Azad-1 showed higher callus response than PU-19 and Azad-2. At 0.1 mM more
callusing and CFW was found in PU-19 than Azad-2 and Azad-1. As compared to other
explants CFW was very less in shoot apex. In control, genotype with maximum CFW
was IPU-94-1 and minimum in PU-19. In 0.05 mM highest CFW was again in IPU-94-1
and lowest in Azad-2. Effect of glyphosate were also studied on multiple shoot and shoot
buds induction using three shoot media: D (NAA-1.0+BAP-1.5+Kn-0.5 mg/l), H (NAA -
0.5+ BAP-2.0+ Kn-1.0 mg/l), I (NAA-2.0+BAP-2.0+Kn-1.0 mg/l). In media –(D) among
the four seedling explants cotyledonary node and shoot apex showed better positive
response for shoot formation than epicotyl and hypocotyl in control as well as herbicide
media in all the six genotypes. In epicotyl shoot was not observed in any treatment as
well as genotype whereas cotyledonary node showed good shooting and callusing in
control as well as stress media. There was progressive decline in percent shoot response,
shoot number per explant and shoot length as glyphosate concentration increased in all
genotypes but response varied with the genotype. At higher glyphosate concentration 0.1
mM shooting was observed in PU-35, PU-31 and IPU -94-1 while only IPU-94-1
showed shooting at 0.2 mM. At 0.05 mM highest percent shoot response was recorded in
Azad-1 while lowest at PU-35. In control, highest number of shoots per explant was
observed and among genotypes it was highest in genotype IPU-94-1 while lowest in PU-
19. At 0.05 mM concentration of herbicide maximum number of shoots per explant was
recorded in Azad-2 while minimum in PU-31 at the same herbicide concentration longest
shoots were recorded in Azad-1 and shortest in PU-35. Hypocotyl showed callusing and
shooting and shoot bud formation was recorded only in control in genotypes PU-35, PU-
31 and Azad-1.
In shoot media (H) best shooting response was observed in cotyledonary explant
followed by shoot apex and hypocotyl in which directly shoots and shoot buds formed
with callusing. As glyphosate concentration increased, there was progressive reduction in
% shoot response, shoot number and shoot length in all genotypes. Shooting was
observed in control as well as herbicide media of 0.01 mM, 0.05 mM while at 0.1 mM
response was not observed in PU-35 and PU-31. At 0.2 mM response was observed only
in PU-19 and Azad-1. No response was observed at 0.4 mM in any explant and
genotype. Highest percent shoot response was found in control and it was highest in
143
Azad-1 and lowest in PU-31. In control highest number of shoots per explant was
recorded in Azad-1 followed by PU-31, Azad-2, PU-19, PU-35, IPU-94-1. At highest
stress level (0.4 mM glyphosate) highest number of shoots per explant was recorded in
Azad-1 followed by IPU-94-1, PU-19, Azad-2, PU-35. In media (H) hypocotyl explants
also showed good response for shooting in control as well as herbicide treated media. At
0.05 mM shoots were not formed except in Azad-1. Azad-1 also showed maximium
response at 0.01 mM while minimum was found in PU-35 and PU-31. Shooting response
in shoot apex explants was observed at 0.05 mM in all genotypes. In 0.1 mM, genotype
PU-35 and IPU-94-1 showed shoot response while in 0.2 mM only genotype IPU-94-1
showed response.
In shoot media (I) cotyledonary and shoot apex showed multiple shoots, shoot
buds and shoots with callus in control and herbicide treated media but cotyledonary node
were found superior for callusing as well as shooting. For cotyledonary node explants
genotype PU-35 showed maximum percent shooting response and genotype IPU-94-1
showed minimum response in control. At 0.1 mM where all genotypes showed
organogenesis, highest and lowest response was observed in PU-19 and Azad-2
respectively. In control, maximum number of shoots was found in PU-19 and minimum
in PU-35 and Azad-2 while in 0.1 mM maximum shoot number were again noticed in
PU-19 and minimum in Azad-2. At 0.2 mM longest shoots were recorded in PU-19
followed by IPU-94-1 and Azad-1 while shortest shoots were formed in genotype PU-31
and Azad-2.
For shoot apex explants in control greatest percent response was recorded in
Azad-2 followed by PU-19, Azad-1, IPU-94-1and lowest in PU-31. At 0.1 mM genotype
PU-19 showed highest regeneration response followed by PU-35, Azad-1 while genotype
Azad-2 showed minimum response. Maximum number of shoots in control was found in
genotype IPU-94-1while minimum in Azad-1 and PU-19. At 0.1 mM genotype PU-19
and IPU-94-1 showed maximum shoot number and Azad-1 and Azad-2 showed least
shoot number.
Effect of glyphosate on root formation, root number and root length was analyzed
using root media (MS media supplemented with NAA+BAP-3.0+1.0mg/l and
glyphosate). Hypocotyl and cotyledonary node explants showed better rooting response
than leaf segments and shoot apex. For leaf explants, in control percent root response
144
was maximum in IPU-94-1 followed by Azad-1 and PU-35 and minimum in PU-19. At
0.01 mM, percent root response was decreased with respect to control in all genotypes
except in PU-19 where it was increased up to 80.00%. Maximum number of roots per
explant was found in control and among genotypes highest in PU-19 and minimum in
Azad-2. In cotyledonary node explants at 0.01 mM only PU-19, PU-35 and Azad-1
showed rooting in cotyledonary node explants while at 0.05 mM PU-19, IPU-94-1 and
Azad-2 showed response and maximum value was found in IPU-94-1. Number of roots
per explant and root length did not showed definite pattern of decrease on increasing
herbicide concentrations like other parameters in other responses like callus fresh weight,
shoot number and shoot length. Usually longest roots were in control but in some
genotypes PU-35 and Azad-1 average root length was slightly increased in 0.01 mM.
Hypocotyl explants were found best for rooting and callusing in PGR
combination of NAA (3.0 mg/l)+BAP (1.0mg/l). Rooting were observed in all genotypes
in control, 0.01 mM (except Azad-2), 0.05 mM (except IPU-94-1), 0.1 mM (except
Azad-2) and at 0.2 mM in PU-19, PU-35 and Azad-1.
Gradual and shock stress treatment of callus cultures of selected tolerant genotypes
In gradual treatment glyphosate treatment significantly inhibited callus growth as
observed by consistent decrease in fresh weight with the increasing concentration of
herbicide. At 0.01 mM significant (p < 0.05) decrease in fresh weight was observed
except in IPU-94-1, However at next herbicide level 0.05 mM, all genotypes showed
significant reduction in fresh weight. Maximum fresh weight was observed in PU-19
(1.61±0.09g) whereas IPU-94-1 showed minimum fresh weight (1.48±0.06g). 0.4 mM
glyphosate was found to be lethal to all genotypes. When cultures were gradually
subcultured on media with higher concentration of glyphosate, inhibition was observed
in all growth parameters but it was less than shock treatment. At highest stress level 0.4
mM maximum percentage of surviving cultures were found in PU-19. Tolerance index
was also highest for IPU-94-1. In direct shock treatment at highest stress level (0.4 mM)
maximum percentage of surviving cultures was observed in IPU-94-1while minimum
value obtained in PU-19 and in Azad-1 there was no cultures survived at this
concentration. Among genotypes maximum callus fresh weight at 0.4 mM was found in
IPU-94-1 with minimum 86.74% reduction over control while Azad-1 showed 100%
reduction in fresh weight. These results showed that IPU-94-1 and PU-19 shows higher
tolerance than Azad-1.
145
In vivo assessment of effect of herbicide and tolerance in Vigna mungo genotypes
Glyphosate treatment showed adverse impact on survival percentage and plant
height, number of nodes per plant, internodal length, pods per plant, pod length and
seeds per pod. Consequently glyphosate also reduced yield as reflected by a gradual
decrease in the growth and yield in all the three black gram genotypes and it was
decreased in dose dependent manner. At highest concentration, 6 mM, genotype PU-19
showed maximum survival percentage and height whereas Azad-1 showed minimum. On
the basis of overall morphological and yield parameters it was concluded that high doses
of herbicide glyphosate reduce crop yield in black gram genotypes PU-19 and IPU-94-1
were more tolerant than Azad-1.
The influence of glyphosate was also seen on leaf pigments. The pigment
content was measured in the leaves of treated plants. It was seen that glyphosate severely
affected pigment content. The reduction in pigment content suggested that glyphosate
disturbed pigment metabolism in plants. Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll,
and carotenoids registered a decrease after glyphosate treatment. Chl a content was
highly reduced in PU-19 as compared to IPU-94-1 and Azad-1. In case of Chl b, Azad-1
showed more decrease as compared to IPU-94-1 and Azad-1.
Activity of antioxidative enzymes was also evaluated in three genotypes after
glyphosate treatment. Catalase, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activity were
increased with increase in herbicide concentration. At 6 mM glyphosate dose catalase
activity was maximum in PU-19 followed by IPU-94-1 and Azad-1. Peroxidase activity
also significantly increased like catalase with the increasing herbicide concentration (1
mM and 2 mM) and then it was decreased but in case of PU-19 it consistently increased
up to 4 mM and then decreased. At 6 mM highest activity was obtained in Azad-1
whereas lowest activity was shown by IPU-94-1. After the glyphosate treatment, SOD
activity was found to increase significantly in all the three varieties from 2 mM to 6 mM
except in IPU-94-1 where it decreased sharply at 6 mM.
Post emergent treatment of glyphosate caused a general increase in total protein
content as compared to control in all treatments and genotypes. At 6 mM minimum
protein content was found in PU-19 (6.20±0.09 mg/g FW) and maximum in IPU -94-1.
146
To assess effect of herbicide glyphosate on lipid membranes of leaves
malondialdehyde content was analysed in leaves of three Vigna mungo genotypes. MDA
was found to increase significantly in 4 mM and 6 mM in all the three genotypes. MDA
content at 6 mM was maximum in PU-19, followed by IPU-94-1, and lowest in Azad-1.
The increase in MDA content indicates that glyphosate caused lipid membrane damage
in V. mungo.
After the glyphosate treatment, proline was usually found to increase in all
treatments and genotypes but significant increase was found only at 4 mM and 6 mM.
Proline content at 6 mM was maximum in Azad-1 and minimum in PU-19.
In conclusion germination percentage, survival percentage, root length, seedling
tolerance index, activity of catalase, peroxidase, and SOD, callus fresh weight, and callus
tolerance index are the few important parameters that can be utilized for the screening of
herbicide tolerant genotypes in Vigna mungo as well as other crop plants. Among various
in vitro methods used in present study, in vitro seed germination method and gradual
stress treatment of herbicide to calli gave more accurate and precise findings about
relative tolerance of cultivars for the herbicide.
Glyphosate application cause oxidative stress and elevation of antioxidant
defense system in non target crop black gram. Genotypes PU-19, IPU-94-1 and Azad-1
can better combat the oxidative stress than PU-31, PU-35 and Azad-2 induced by
glyphosate application. Selected genotypes and in vitro methods used in present study
may be utilized in Vigna mungo and other crop improvement programme as well as for
the study of molecular basis of herbicide tolerance in these tolerant genotypes in contrast
to susceptible genotypes.
Herbicide treatment caused decrease in germination percentage, survival
percentage, root length, shoot length, fresh weight and dry weight of seedlings in all the
genotypes and in both germination screening methods. Genotypes showed differential
response towards glypohosate toxicity at its higher doses.
147
8.0 References
Aasim M (2010). In vitro shoot regeneration of NAA-pulse treated plumular leaf explants of cowpea.
Notulae Scientia Biologicae 2 (2): 60-63.
Aasim M, Khawar KM, Özcan S (2008). In vitro micropropagation from shoot meristems of turkish cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) cv. Akkiz. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 37(2): 149-
154.
Aasim M, Khawar KM, Özcan S (2009). Comparison of shoot regeneration on different concentrations of thidiazuron from shoot tip explant of cowpea on gelrite and agar containing
medium. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 37(1):89-93.
Aasim M, Khawar KM, Özcan S (2013). Production of herbicide-resistant cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) transformed with the bar gene. Turkish Journal of Biology 37(4): 472-478.
Aazami MA, Torabi M, Jalili E (2010). In vitro response of promising tomato genotypes for
tolerance to osmotic stress. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(26): 4014-4017.
Abdel-Hady MS (2006). In vitro prediction for salt tolerance in wheat. 2nd international conference on water resources and arid environment. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia:6-10.
Abdelkader AF, Ahmed EF (2012). Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of drought-endemic
plants and enzymes production in Schefflera arboricola plants under pesticides stress. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 6(9):1596-1604.
Abdel-Raheem AT, Samera AM, Ragab AR, Kasem ZA, Omar FD (2007). In vitro selection for
tomato plants for drought tolerance via callus culture under polyethylene glycol (PEG) and
mannitol treatments. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings 8 (8): 2027–2032.
Abdul-Baki AA, Anderson JO (1973).Vigour determination in soybean application of dairy manure
on germination and emergence of some selected crops. Crop Science 13:630- 633.
Abu-Irmaileh BE, Jordan LS (1978). Some aspects of glyphosate action in purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus).Weed Science 26(6):700-703.
Acuna AA, Gardner DS, Danneberger TK (2009). A bioassay technique to measure premergence
herbicide activity in turfgrass. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal 11:293-297.
Adkins SW, Kunanuvatchaidach R, Godwin ID (1995). Somaclonal variation in rice to drought
tolerance and other agronomic characters. Australian journal of Botany, 43(2):201-209.
Adlinge PM, KC Samal, Kumara Swamy RV, Rout GR (2013). Rapid In vitro plant regeneration
of black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) var. Sarala, an important legume crop. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, December
2013:1-5.
Agnieszka I, Cieslak P, Adomas B, Michalczyk DJ (2010). Different glyphosate phytotoxicity of seeds and seedlings of selected plant species. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 19
(1):123-129.
Agnihotri S, Singh RR, Chaturvedi HC (2001). In vitro high frequency regeneration of plantlets of Vigna mungo and their ex vitro growth. Indian Journal of experimental Biology (39): 916-
920.
Ahmed AM, El-Tayeb MA, Ismail AM, Galal HR (2000). Effect of atrazine on growth,
photosynthesis, respiration and species composition of fresh water algae. Bulletin of the
148
Faculty of Science. A. Physics and Mathematics. Faculty of Science, Assiut University, 1–
29:349–356.
Ahsan N, Lee DG, Lee KW, Alam I, Lee SH, Bahk JD, Lee B (2008). Glyphosate-induced
oxidative stress in rice leaves revealed by proteomic approach. Plant Physiology and
Biochemistry 46(12):1062-1070.
Aioub AAA, Gullner G, Kömives (1993). Peroxidation of lipids in corn plants exposed to heavy metal and herbicide stress. Book, Oxygen free radicals and scavengers in the natural
sciences. pp. 57-60, ISBN 963-05-6589-7.
Akhar FK, Bagheri A, Moshtaghi N, Nezami A (2011). The effect of gamma radiation on freezing tolerance of chickpea (Cicer aretinum L.) at In vitro culture. Journal of Biological and
Environmental Sciences 5:63-70.
Al Mansoori TA, Alaa El-Deen MN, Caligari PD (2006). Evaluation of In vitro screening techniques for salt tolerance in date palm. In III International Date Palm Conference 736:
301-307.
Al-Amier H, Craker LE (2007). In-vitro selection for stress tolerant spearmint. Issues in New Crops
and New Uses: 306-310.
Ali A, Fletcher RA (1978). Phytotoxic action of glyphosate and amitrole on corn Seedlings.
Canadian Journal of Botany 56:2196-2202.
Almas Z, Khan MS, Rizvi PQ (2005). Effect of herbicides on growth, nodulation and nitrogen content of greengram. Agronomy and Sustainable Development 25: 497-504.
Alvi S, Perveen R, Naqvi II, Shaukat SS (2003). Effect of atrazine on absorption and translocation
of p32, chlorophyll, carbohydrate, protein and potassium contents in bean Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 6: 249-251.
Ameri A, Lorzadeh SH, Gomarian M (2012). Survey effects of different doses of Pursuit
herbicides on weed control and yield and yield components of two cultivars of cowpea in
climatic conditions Ahvaz. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 3 (11): 2190-2194.
Amrhein N, Deus B, Gehrke P, Steinrucken HC (1980). The site of the inhibition of the shikimate
pathway by glyphosate. Plant Physiology 66: 830-834.
Amrhein N, Johanning D, Schab J, Schulz A (1983). Biochemical basis for glyphosate-tolerance in
a bacterium and a plant tissue culture. FEBS Letters 157: 191-196.
Amutha S, Muruganantham M, Ganapathi A (2006). Thidiazuron-induced high-frequency
axillary and adventitious shoot regeneration in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant 42(1):26-30.
Ananieva EA, Christov KN, Popova LP (2004). Exogenous treatment with salicylic acid leads to
increased antioxidant capacity in leaves of barley plants exposed to paraquat. Journal of Plant Physiology 161: 319-328.
Anderson P, McCoy TJ, Heath-Pagliuso S, Hammerschlag FA (1987). Selection of useful
somaclonal variants. Agricell Report 9 (1): 3.
Anwar N, Kikuchi A, Watanabe KN (2010). Assessment of somaclonal variation for salinity
tolerance in sweet potato regenerated plants. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(43):7256-
7265.
Arnaud L, Saillanda A, Lebrun M, Pallett K, Ravanel P, Nurit F, Tissut M (1998). Physiological behavior of two tobacco lines expressing EPSP synthase resistant to glyphosate. Pesticide
Biochemistry and Physiology 62: 27-39.
Arnon DI (1949). Copper enzymes in violated chloroplast polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24: 1-15.
149
Artetxe U, Hernández A, García-Plazaola JI, Becerril JM (2006). Do light acclimation
mechanisms reduce the effects of light-dependent herbicides in duckweed (Lemna minor)? Weed Science 54:230–236.
Arya KR, Gupta RC, Semwal BD, Beg MU (1994). In vitro selection of endosulfan-tolerant strains
of Brassica compestris (cv. Brown Sarson). Plant cell reports, 14(2-3):137-140.
Asada K, Takahashi M (1987). Production and scavenging of active oxygen in photosynthesis. In Photoinhibition, (Eds. D. J. Kylc, C. B. Osmond, C. J. Arntzen). Amsterdam: Elsevier
Science pp. 227-87.
Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007). Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environatal and Experimental Botany 59: 206-216.
Avenido RA, Hattori K (1999). Differences in shoot regeneration response from cotyledonary node
explants in Asiatic Vigna species support genomic grouping within subgenus Ceratotropis (Piper) Verdc. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 58 (2):99-110.
Avenido RA, Hattori K (2000). Benzyladenine-induced adventitious shoot regeneration from
hypocotyls of adzukibean (Vigna angularis {Willd.} Ohwi and Ohashi). Plant Growth
Regulation 31(3):147-153.
Avenido RA, Hautea DM (1990). In vitro organogenesis and flowering in mungbean (Vigna radiata
L. Wilczek). Philippine Journal of Crop Science, 15(3), 169-173.
Badere RS, Koche DK, Pawar SE, AD Choudhary (2002). Regeneration through muliple shooting in Vigna radiata. Journal of Cytology and Genetics 3 (NS): 185-190.
Badr A, Zaki H, Germoush MO, Tawfeek AQ, El-Tayeb MA (2013). Cytophysiological impacts
of Metosulam herbicide on Vicia faba plants. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 35(6):1933-1941.
Baig MN, Darwent AL, Harker KN, Odonovan JT (2003). Pre- harvest applications of glyphosate
affect emergence and seedling growth of field pea (Pisum sativum). Weed Technology 3:
655-665.
Baillie AMR, Rossnagel BG, Kartha KK (1993). In vitro selection for improved chlorsulfuron tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Euphytica 67: 151-154.
Bajaj YPS, Dhanju MS (1979). Regeneration of plants from apical meristem tips of some legumes.
Current Science 84: 906‐907.
Barakat MN, Abdel-Latif TH (1996). In vitro selection of wheat callus tolerant to high levels of
salt and plant regeneration. Euphytica 91(2):127-140.
Barik DP, Mohapatra U, Chand PK (2005). High frequency In vitro regeneration of Lathyrus sativus L. Biologia Plantarum 49: 637-639.
Basantani M, Srivastava A, Sen S (2011). Elevated antioxidant response and induction of tau-class
glutathione S-transferase after glyphosate treatment in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 99: 111–117.
Bates LS, Waldern RP, Teare ID (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water stress
studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205–207.
Batish DR, Singh HP, Setia N, Kaur S, Kohli RK (2006). 2-Benzoxazolinone (BOA) induced
oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation and changes in some antioxidant enzyme activities in
mung bean (Phaseolus aureus). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 44:819-27.
Bavaresco L, Fregoni M, Gambi E (1993). In vitro method to screen grapevine genotypes for tolerance to lime induced chlorosis. Vitis 32:145-148
Baylis AD (2000). Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses and prospects. Pest
Management Science 56: 299–308.
150
Beauchamp C, Fridovich I (1971). Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable
to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry 44: 276-287.
Beckie HJ, Friesen LF, Nawolsky KM, Morrison IN (1990). A rapid bioassay to detect trifluralin-
resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Technology 4:505-508.
Beligni MV, Lamattina L (1999). Nitric oxide protects against cellular damage produced by methyl
viologen herbicide in potato plants. Nitric Oxide 3:199-208.
Benderradji L, Brini F, Kellou K, Ykhelf N, Djekoun A, Masmoudi K, Bouzerour H (2012). Callus induction, proliferation, and plantlets regeneration of two bread wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.) genotypes under saline and heat stress conditions. ISRN Agronomy:1-8.
Bertin P, Bouharmont J (1997). Use of somaclonal variation and In vitro selection for chilling
tolerance improvement in rice. Euphytica 96:135–142.
Betal S, Raychaudhuri SS (1999). Micropropagation of the endangered aromatic varieties of Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek in West Bengal, India. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-
Plant, 35(1):76-78.
Beversdorf WD, Kott LS (1987). An In vitro mutagenesis/selection system for Brassica napus.
Lowa State Journal of Research 61:435–443.
Beyer WF Jr, Fridovich I (1987). Catalses-with and without heme. In: Simic MG, Taylor KA,
Ward JF and Von Sonntag C, (Eds.), Oxygen Radicals in Biology and Medicine, Plenum,
New York. pp 651-661.
Biçakçi E, Memon AR (2005). An efficient and rapid In vitro regeneration system for metal
resistant cotton. Biologia Plantarum 49 (3): 415-417.
Bird KT (1993). Comparisons of herbicide toxicity using In vitro cultures of Myriophyllum spicatum. Journal of Aquatic plant management. 31:43-45.
Biswas J, Chowdhury B, Bhattacharya A, Mandal AB (2002). In vitro screening for increased
drought tolerance in rice. In vitro Cellular and Devlopmental Biology—Plant 38:525–530.
Blackburn LG, Boutin C (2003). Subtle effects of herbicide use in the context of genetically modified crops: a case study with glyphosate (Roundup). Ecotoxicology 12(1-4):271-85.
Blokhina O, Virolainen E, Fagerstedt KV (2002). Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen
deprivation stress: a review. Annals of Botany 91:179-194.
Bohnert HJ, Nelson DE, Jensen RG (1995). Adaptations to environmental stress. Plant Cell 7:
1099-1111.
Boscherini G, Muleo R, Montagni G, Cinelli F, Pellegrini MG, Bernardini M, Buiatti M (1999). Characterization of salt tolerant plants derived from a Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. somaclone. Journal of Plant Physiology 155: 613-619.
Boulter D, Crocoma OJ (1979). Plant cell culture implications: legumes, In: W.R. Sharp, P.O.
Larsen, F.F. Paddock and V. Ragavan (eds) Plant cell and tissue culture Principles and applications. pp. 615–632. Ohio State University Press, Columbia.
Bowler C, Van Montagu M, Inze D (1992). Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Annual
Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 43(1): 83–116.
Bozorgipour R, JW Snape (1991). In vitro selection of herbicide- tolerant variants of wheat, In:
Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops (Eds. G. S. Caseley, G. W. Cussans, and R. K.
Atkin), 422-423. XI Long Ashton Int. Symp. 1989, Butterworth.
Bozorgipour R, Snape JW (1997). An assessment of somaclonal variation as a breeding tool for generation of herbicide- tolerant genotypes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 94:
335-340.
151
Bradford MM (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of
protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248-254.
Brar MS, Al-Khayri JM, Shamblin CE, McNew RW, Morelock, TE, Anderson EJ (1997b). In
vitro shoot tip multiplication of cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. In vitro Cellular and
Developmental Biology-Plant 33(2):114-118.
Brar MS, Anderson EJ, Morelock TE, McNew RW (1997a). The effect of media constituents on In vitro culturing of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) shoot tip and leaf disk explants. Journal of
Arkansas Academy of sciences 51: 41-47.
Brecke BJ, Duke WB (1980). Effect of glyphosate on intact bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and isolated cells. Plant Physiology 66: 656-659.
Cakmak I, Yazici A, Tutus Y, Ozturk L (2009). Glyphosate reduced seed and leaf concentrations
of calcium, manganese, magnesium, and iron in non-glyphosate resistant soybean. European Journal of Agronomy 31: 114–119.
Cañal MJ, Tamés RS, Fernández B (1988). Peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities in
Cyperus esculentus leaves following glyphosate applications. Physiologia Plantarum,
74: 125–130.
Carlioz A, Touati D (1986). Isolation of superoxide dismutase mutants in Escherechia coli: Is
superoxide dismutase necessary for aerobic life? EMBO Journal. 5: 623-630.
Caseley, JC, Coupland D (1985). Environmental and plant factors affecting glyphosate uptake, movement, and activity in The Herbicide Glyphosate; Grossbard, E., Atkinson, D., Eds.,
Butterworths, London. p. 92-123.
Castro AJ, Carapito C, NZC Magné NZC, Leize E, Dorsselaer AV, Clément C (2005). Proteomic analysis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) tissues subjected to herbicide stress.
Journal of Experimental Botany 56 (421): 2783-2795.
Çavuşoğlu K, Yalçin E, Türkmen Z, Yapar K, Çavuşoğlu K, Çiçek F (2011). Investigation of
toxic effects of the glyphosate on Allium cepa. Journal of Agricultural Science 17:131-142.
Cerdeira AL, Cole AW, Luthe DS (1985). Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seed protein response to
glyphosate. Weed Science 33(1): 1-6.
Chaleff RS (1986a). Herbicide resistance. Agricell Report 6(4): 28.
Chaleff RS (1983). Isolation of agronomically useful mutants from plant cell cultures. Science,
219:676-682.
Chaleff RS, Parson MF (1978). Direct selection In vitro for herbicide reasistant mutants of Nicotiana tabacum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America 75:5704-5707.
Chaleff RS (1986b). Selection for herbicide-resistant mutants. pp. 133–148 in D.A.Evans, W.R.Sharp, and P.V.Ammirato (eds) “Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Vol. 4”, Collier
Macmillan Publishers, London.
Chao L, Zhou QX, Chen S, Cui S (2007). Effects of herbicide acetochlor on physiological
mechanisms in wheat and biomarkers identification]. Huan jing ke xue= Huanjing kexue/[bian ji, Zhongguo ke xue yuan huan jing ke xue wei yuan hui" Huan jing ke xue" bian
ji wei yuan hui.], 28(4): 866-871.
Cha-um S, Surawattananon S, Namwongprom K, Wongwattana C (1999). Selection of KDML105 calli tolerance to glyphosate. Kasetsart Journal : Natural Science 33: 507 – 514.
Chen C, Dickman MB (2005). Proline suppresses apoptosis in the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum
trifolii. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(9):3459-3464.
152
Chen L, Xie M, Bi Y, GaohongWangb, Deng S, Liu Y (2012a). The combined effects of UV-B
radiation and herbicides on photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes and DNA damage in two bloom-forming cyanobacteria. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 80:224–230.
Chen PK, Polatnick M (1991). Comparative study on artemisinin, 2,4-d, and glyphosate. Journal of
Agricultural Food Chemistry 39: 991-994.
Chen S, Chai M, Jia Y, Gao Z, Zhang L, Gu M, Lin W, Wang L (2012b). In vitro selection of glyphosate-tolerant variants from long-term callus cultures of Zoysia matrella [L.] Merr.
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 111(2):199-207.
Chia LS, McRae DG, Thompson JE (1982). Light-dependence of paraquat-initiated membrane deeterioration in bean plants. Evidence for the involvement of superoxide. Physiologia
Plantarum 56: 492-499.
Choi DG, Yoo NH, Yu CY, Reyes B, Yun SJ (2004). The activities of antioxidant enzymes in response to oxidative stresses and hormones in paraquat-tolerant Rehmannia glutinosa plants
Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 37(5): 618-624.
Chou CH, Chiang YC, CI Khan (1978). Impact of water pollution on crop growth in Taiwan. Botanical
Bulletin Acadamic Sinica 19: 107-124.
Clark GM (2012). From the field. Providing practical, timely useful crop production information
(http://www.michigansugar.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Weed-Mgt.pdf).
Clua A, Conti M, Beltrano J (2012). The effects of glyphosate on the growth of birdsfoot trefoil
(Lotus corniculatus) and its interaction with different phosphorus contents in soil. Journal of Agricultural Science 4(7):208-218.
Cole DJ (1985). Mode of action of glyphosate—a literature analysis. In: Grossbard E,
Atkinson D (eds) The herbicide glyphosate. Butterworths, London, pp 48–74.
Coruzzi G, Last R (2002). Amino Acids. In: Buchanan BB, Gruissem W and Jones RL, (Eds.),
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants, American Society of Plant Physiologists, pp 382.
Coskun G, Zihnioglu F (2002). Effect of some biocides on glutathione S-transferase in
barley, wheat, lentil and chickpea plants. Turkish Journal of Biology 26: 89-94.
Cseplo A, Medgyesy P, Hideg E, Demeter S, Marton L, Maliga P (1985). Triazine-resistant
Nicotiana mutants from photomixotrophic cell cultures. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 200:508–10.
Das DK, Prakash NS, Bhalla-Sarin N (1998). An efficient regeneration system of black gram
(Vigna mungo L.) through organogenesis. Plant Science 134(2):199–206.
Das SK, Saha D, Bhattacharya SP (1990). Chemical weed control in black gram through AC-263,499. Environment and Ecology 8(4):1307-1308.
Dasgupta M, Sahoo MR, Kole PC, Mukherjee A (2008). Evaluation of orange-fleshed sweet
potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) genotypes for salt tolerance through shoot apex culture under In vitro NaCl mediated salinity stress conditions. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 94(2):
161-170.
Davies KJA (2001). Oxidative stress, antioxidant defenses, and damage removal, repair, and
replacement systems, IUBMB Life 50 279-289.
De Felipe MR, Pozuelo JM, Lucas MM, Fernandez del Campo F (1986). The effect of
isoproturon on root-growth and ultrastructure of the photosynthetic apparatus of two wheat
cultivars and a weed. Physiologia Plantarum 66:563-8.
153
De Prado JL, De Prado RA, Shimabukuro RH (1999). The effect of diclofop on membrane
potential, ethylene induction, and herbicide phytotoxicity in resistant and susceptible biotypes of grasses. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 63:1-14.
De Prado, RA, Franco AR (2004). Cross-resistance and herbicide metabolism in grass weeds in
Europe: biochemical and physiological aspects. Weed Science.52:441-447.
De Souza RC, Ferreira DTDARG, Vitorino HDOSS, Geraldo Barbosa VDES, Endres L, Ferreira VM (2012). Oxidative stress in Emilia coccinea (Asteraceae) caused by a mixture
of Clomazone + Ametryn. International Research Journal of Plant Science 3(5):80-87.
Deeds ZA, Al-Khatib K, Peterson DE, Stahlman PW (2006). Wheat response to simulated drift of glyphosate and imazamox applied at two growth stages. Weed Technology 20:23-31.
del Rio LA, Sevilla F, Sandalio LM, Palma JM (1991). Nutritional effect and expression of SODs:
induction and gene expression; diagnostics: prospective protection against oxygen toxicity. Free Radical Resarch 13(1): 819-27.
Della-Cioppa G, Bauer SC, Klein BK, Shah DM, Fraley RT, Kishore GM (1986). Translocation
of the precursor of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase into chloroplasts of higher
plants in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83(18): 6873-6877.
Délye C, Zhang XQ, Michel S, Matéjicek A, Powles S (2005). Molecular bases for sensitivity to
Acetyl-Coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors in black grass. Plant physiology 137:794-806.
Demiral T, Turkan I (2005). Comparative lipid peroxidation, antioxidant defense systems and proline content in roots of two rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Environmental and
Experimental Botany. 53:247-257.
Devine M, Shukla A (2000). Altered target sites as a mechanism of herbicide resistance. Crop Protection 19:881-889.
Devine MD, Preston C (2000). The molecular basis of herbicide resistance. Pages 72-104 in A. H.
Cobb and R. C. Kirkwood, eds. Herbicides and their mechanisms of action. Boca Raton, FL:
CRC Press, Inc.
Di Tomaso JM (1999). Growth regulators. Presented at the UC Davis Weed Science School, Feb.
24-26 and March 1-3, 1999. Davis, California.
Diallo MS, Ndiaye A, Sagna M, Gassama-Dia YK (2008). Plants regeneration from African cowpea variety (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(16).
Dickinson NM, Turner AP, Lepp NW (1991). How do trees and other long-lived plants survive in
polluted environments? Functional Ecology, 5: 5-11.
Doganlar ZB (2012). Quizalofop-p-ethyl-induced phytotoxicity and genotoxicity in Lemna minor and Lemna gibba. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous
Substances and Environmental Engineering 47, 11:1631-1643.
Dowidar SMA, Osman MEH, El-Naggar AH, Khalefa AE (2010). Effect of butachlor and thiobencarb herbicides on protein content and profile and some enzyme activities of Nostoc
muscorum. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 8(1): 89-95.
Dragiiska R, Djilianov D, Denchev P, Atanassov A (1996). In vitro selection for osmotic tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Bulgarian Journal of Plant physiology 22(3–4), 30–39.
Dryanova A, Dimitrov B (2000). Influence of the herbicide Stomp 330 on morphogenetic response
of triticale callus cultures. Cytological evidences for its mutagenic action. Cytologia 65
(1):17-23.
Duke SO (1990). Overview of herbicide mechanisms of action. Environmantal Health Perspectives
87: 263-271.
154
Duke SO, Kenyon WH (1986). Effects of dimethazone (FMC 57020) on chloroplast development
II. Pigment synthesis and photosynthetic function in 3cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) primary leaves. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 25: 11-18.
Duke SO, Paul RN (1986). Effects of dimethazone (FMC 57020) on chloroplast development 1.
Ultrastructural effects in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) primary leaves. Pesticide
Biochemistry and Physiology 25: 1-10.
Duke SO, Rimando AM, Pace PF, Reddy KN, Smeda RJ (2003). Isoflavone, glyphosate, and
aminomethylphosphonic acid levels in seeds of glyphosate-treated, glyphosate-resistant
soybean. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 51(1), 340-344.
Duncan RR, Waskom RM, Nabors MW (1995). In vitro screening and field evaluation of tissue-
culture-regenerated sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) for soil stress tolerance. In The
Methodology of Plant Genetic Manipulation: Criteria for Decision Making (pp. 373-380). Springer Netherlands.
Dungarwal HS, Chaplot PC, Nagda BL (2003). Chemical weed control in mungbean (Phaseolus
radiatus L.). Indian J Weed Sci 35: 283-284.
Dyer WE, Weller SC, Bressan R, Hermann K (1988). Glyphosate tolerance in Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Plant Physiology 88: 661-666.
Dziadczyk P, Bolibok H, Tyrka M, Hortynski JA (2003). In vitro selection of strawberry
(Fragaria× ananassa Duch.) clones tolerant to salt stress. Euphytica, 132(1): 49-55.
El Tayeb MA, Zaki H (2009). Cytophysiological reponses of Vicia faba to a glyphosate based
herbicide. American-Eurasian Journal of Agronomy 2(3): 168-175.
Ellis BE (1978). Non-differential sensitivity to the herbicide metribuzin in tomato cell suspension cultures. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58: 775-778.
Engler A, Prantl K (1887–1915). Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Wilhelm Engelmann,
Leipzig, Germany.
Escorial MC, Sixto H, Garcia-Baudin JM, Chueca MC (1996). In vitro culture selection increases
glyphosate tolerance in barley. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 46:179–186.
Euler HV, Josephson K (1927). Uber Katalase. I. Justus Liebigs Annalen Der Chemie 452: 158-181.
Fam SS, Morrow JD (2003). The isoprostanes: unique products of arachidonic acid oxidation-a
review. Current medicinal chemistry 10:1723-1740.
Fan JY, Geng JJ, Ren HQ, Wang XR, Han C (2013). Herbicide Roundup® and its main
constituents cause oxidative stress and inhibit acetylcholinesterase in liver of Carassius
auratus. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 48(10).
Farnham MW, Harrison HF (1993). Genotypic variation in broccoli for tolerance to the herbicide oxyfluorfen applied at post-transplant and preemergence stages. Horticulture
Science 28 (5): 566.
Fawzy MA (2008). M.Sc. Thesis entitled “Effect of glyphosate and clodinafop-propargyl herbicides on the species composition, growth and some metabolic activities of soil algae at Assiut”
Assiut University, Egypt
Fayez KA, Radwan EDM, Mohamed AK, Abdelrahman AM (2011). Herbicides and salicylic acid applications caused alterations in total amino acids and proline contents of peanut
cultivars. Journal of Environmental Studies 6:55-61.
Felton WL (1979). Tolerance of mung beans (Vigna radiata) to bentazone. Australian Journal of
Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 19(99): 504 - 509
155
Forlani G, Racchi ML (1995). Glyphosate tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) differential response
among inbred lines. Euphytica 82: 157 -164.
Forlani G, Nielsen E, Racchi ML (1992). A glyphosate-resistant 5-enol-pyruvyl-shikimate-3-
phosphate synthase confers tolerance to a maize cell line. Plant Science 85: 9-15.
Foster JG, Edwards GE (1980). Localization of superoxide dismutase in leaves of C3 and C4 plants.
Plant and Cell Physiology 21:895-906.
Franklin G, Pius PK, Ignacimuthu S (2000). Factors affecting in vitro flowering and fruiting of
green pea (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica 115(1): 65-74.
Franz JE, Mao MK, Sikorski JA (1997). Glyphosate’s molecular mode of action. In Glyphosate: A Unique Global Herbicide ACS. Monograph 189 America Chemical Society: Washington
DC, 521-615.
Gandonou CB, Errabii T, Abrini J, Idaomar M, Senhaji NS (2006). Selection of callus cultures of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) tolerant to NaCl and their response to salt stress. Plant Cell,
Tissue and Organ Culture 87:9–16.
Gangopadhyay G, Basu S, Gupta S (1997). In vitro selection and physiological characterization of
NaCl- and mannitol-adapted callus lines in Brassica juncea. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 50: 161–169.
Garcia-Plazaola JI, Hernandez A, Artetxe U, Becerril JM (2002). Regulation of the xanthophyll
cycle pool size in duckweed (Lemna minor) plants. Physiologia Plantarum 116:121–126.
Garg G (2010). In vitro screening of Catharanthus roseus L. cultivars for salt tolerance using
physiological parameters. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development
1(1):24-29.
Garg N, Manchanda G (2009). ROS generation in plants: boon or bane? Plant Biosystems. 143:8-
96.
Gaur PM, Jukanti AK, Samineni S, Chaturvedi SK, Singh S, Tripathi S, Singh I, Singh G,
Das TK, Aski M, Mishra N, Nadarajan N, Laxmipathi Gowda CL (2013). Large genetic variability in chickpea for tolerance to herbicides imazethapyr and metribuzin. Agronomy 3:
524-536.
Geetha N, Venkatachlum P, Rao GR (1997). In vitro plant regeneration from different seedling explants of blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] via organogenesis. Breeding science 47
(4): 311-315.
Geiger DR, Fuchs MA (2002). Inhibitors of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis (glyphosate) In:
Herbicide Classes in Development (ed. By Böger P., Wakabayashi K. and Hirai K.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 59–85.
Geoffroy L, Teisseire H, Couderchet M, Vernet G (2002). Effect of oxyfluorfen and diuron alone
and in mixture on antioxidative nzymes of Scenedesmus obliquus. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 72(3): 178–185.
Ghoulam C, Ahmed F, Khalid F (2001). Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline
accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars. Environmental and Experimental Botany 47:139-150.
Gill R, Eapen S, Rao PS (1987). Morphogenic studies of cultured cotyledons of urd bean (Vigna
mungo L. Hepper). Journal of Plant Physiology 130(1):1–5.
Gill R, Eapen S, Rao PS (1988). Regeneration and differentiation of protoplasts in grain legumes. Progress in Plant Protoplast Research Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in
Agriculture 7: 99-100.
Gill SS, Tuteja N (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 48 909-930.
156
Gilreath JP, Chase CA, SJ Locascio (2000). Influence of sublethal glyphosate rates on leaf mineral
concentration of tomato. Horticulture Science 5(6):1078–1082.
Girisha TK, Pratapeb VM, Prasada Rao UJS (2012). Nutrient distribution, phenolic acid
composition, antioxidant and alpha-glucosidase inhibitory potentials of black gram (Vigna
mungo L.) and its milled by-products. Food Research International 46 (1): 370–377.
Gopal J, Iwama K (2007). In vitro screening of potato against water-stress mediated through sorbitol and polyethylene glycol. Plant Cell Reports 26:693–70.
Gratao PL, Polle A, Lea PJ, Azevedo RA (2005). Making the life of heavy metal-stressed plants a
little easier. Functional Plant Biology 32:481–494
Green GM, RL Layman (1972). Proceedings of the society for experimental biology and medicine.,
140: 291.
Greenberg JT, Monach P, Chou LH, Josephy PD, Demple B (1990). Positive control of a global antioxidant defense regulon activated by superoxide generating agents in Escherichia coli.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87(16): 6181-6185.
Gressel JS, Zilkah, Ezra G (1978). Herbicide resistance and screening in cultures vs. plants, in
frontiers of plant tissue culture. Proceedings-4th Int. Congr, Plant Tissue Cell Culture T.A. Thorpe ed. IAPTC. Calgary. pp 427-436.
Grey TL, Prostko EP (2010). Physiological effects of late season glyphosate applications on peanut
(Arachis hypogaea) seed development and germination. Peanut Science, 37 (2): 124-128.
Gronwald JW (1994). Resistance to photosystem II inhibiting herbicides. Pages 27-60 in S. B.
Powles and J. A. M. Holtum, eds. Herbicide resistance in plants: biology and biochemistry.
Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc.
Gruys KJ, Sikorski JA (1999). Inhibitors of tryptophan, phenylalanine and tyrosine biosynthesis as
herbicides. Dekker, New York.
Gulati A, Jaiwal PK (1992). In vitro induction of multiple shoots and plant regeneration from shoot
tips of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek), Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 29 (3):199-205.
Gulati A, Jaiwal PK. (1994). Plant regeneration from cotyledonary node explants of mungbean
(Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Plant cell reports, 13(9), 523-527.
Gupta OP, Chaudhry NK (1986). Herbicide evaluation in black gram. Tropical Pest
Management 32(2).
Haberlandt G (1902). Culturversuche mit isolierten Pflanzenzellen. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien,
Math. Nat. Cl. Ill, Abt. 1: 69-91.
Halliwell B (1984). Toxic effects of oxygen on plant tissues. In: B. Halliwell (Ed.), Chloroplast
Metabolism. The Structure and Function of Chloroplasts in Green Leaf Cells, Oxford,
Clarendon Press. pp 180-206.
Hamed BS (1990). M. Sc. Thesis entitled “Effect of metribuzin on growth, nitrogen uptake and some
metabolic activities in Vicia faba seedling”. University of Zagazig, Egypt.
Hammat N, Davey MR (1997). Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from cultured zygotic embryo of soybean (Glycine max). Journal of Plant Physiology 128:219-226.
Hammat N, Ghosh TK, MR Davey (1986). Regeneration in legumes, pp. 66-95. In: I. K. Vasil
(Eds.). Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol. 3. Academic Press, New York.
Hampton JG, Hebblethwaite PD (2006). The preharvest use of glyphosate in the ryegrass seed crop. Grass and Forage Science 37(3):243 - 248.
Hare PD, Cress WA (1997). Metabolic implications of stress-induced proline accumulation in
plants. Plant Growth Regulation 21 (2):79-102.
157
Harms CT, DiMaio JJ, Jayne SM, Middlesteadt LA, Negrotto DV, Taylor HT, Montoya AL (1991). Primisulfuron herbicide-resistant tobacco plants: mutant selection In vitro by adventitious shoot formation from cultured leaf discs. Plant Science 79(1):77-85.
Harper DB, Harvey BMR (1978). Mechanism of paraquat tolerance in perennial ryegrass. II. Role
of superoxide dismutase, catalase and peroxidase. Plant Cell and Environment 1: 211–215.
Harrison HF Jr., Fery L (1993). Differential Bentazon Response in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Weed Technology 7(3):756-758.
Hassan EA (1988). The influence of glyphosate on germination behaviour of wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 161(2):73–78.
Hassan HM, Fridovich I (1977). Regulation of the synthesis of superoxide dismutase in Escherichia
coli. Induction by methyl viologen. Journal of Biological Chemistry 252: 7667-72.
Hassan NM, Nemat Alla MM (2005). Oxidative stress in herbicide-treated broad bean and maize plants, Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 27: 429-438.
Hassan NS, Shaaban LD, Hashem EA, Seleem EE (2004). In vitro selection for water stress
tolerant callus line of Helianthus annus L. Cv. Myak. International Journal of Agriculture
and Biology, 6(1), 13-18.
Hassanpanah D (2010).Evaluation of potato advanced cultivars against water deficit stress under In
vitro and in vivo condition. Biotechnology 9 (2): 164-169.
Hatzios KK, Howe CM (1982). Influence of herbicides hexazinone and chlorsulfuron on metabolism of isolated soybean (Glycine max cultivator essex) leaf cells. Pesticide
Biochemistry and Physiology 17:207–217.
Heath RL, Packer L (1968). Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics,
125(1):189-198.
Heckart DL, Parrott WA, Raymer PL (2010). Obtaining sethoxydim resistance in seashore
paspalum. Crop Science, 50(6):2632-2640.
Hernando F, Royuela M, Muñoz-rueda A, Gonzalez-murua C (1989). Effect of glyphosate on the
greening process and photosynthetic metabolism in Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Journal of Plant
Physiology 134(1): 26–31.
Hess FD (2000). Light-dependent herbicides: an overview. Weed Science: 48(2):160-170.
Hossain Z, Mandal AKA, Datta SK, Biswas AK (2007). Development of NaCl tolerant line in
Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. through shoot organogenesis of selected callus line.
Journal of Biotechnology 129:658-667.
Huang J, Silva EN, Shen Z, Jiang B, Lu H. (2012). Effects of glyphosate on photosynthesis,
chlorophyll fluorescence and physicochemical properties of cogongrass (Imperata
cylindrical L.). Plant Omics Journal, 5(2):177-183.
Hughes K (1983). Selection for herbicide reslstance. In Handbook of plant cell culture, Techniques
for propagatlon and breeding. Evans et al, ed. Macmillan, N.Y. 1 :442-459.
Hutchinson J (1973). The Families of Flowering Plants. Edn. 3, 2 Vols. Claredon Press,
Oxford.
ICAR (1997). Handbook of Agriculture, pp 263
Ignacimuthu S, Franklin G, Melchias G (1997). Multiple shoot induction and In vitro fruiting from
cotyledonary nodes of Vigna mungoL. Hepper. Current Science 73:733-735.
IIPR (2011). Vision 2030. Kanpur: Indian Institute of Pulses Research.
158
Indra P, Mycin TR (2009). Germination changes of varieties of Vigna mungo L. under tannery
effluent stress. Recent Research in Science and Technology, 1(5): 217–222.
Ishaya DB, Tunkub P, Yahaya MS (2008). Effect of pre-emergence herbicide mixtures on cowpea
(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) at Samaru, in northern Nigeria Crop Protection 27 (7): 1105–
1109.
Jackson C, Dench J, Moore AL, Halliwell B, Foyer CH, Hall DO (1978). Subcellular localisation and identification of superoxide dismutase in the leaves of higher plants. European Journal of
biochemistry, 91(2), 339-344.
Jain M (2001). Tissue culture-derived variation in crop improvement. Euphytica 118, 153–166.
Jain RK, Jain S, Nainawatee HS, Chowdhury JB (1990). Salt tolerance in Brassica juncea L. : In
vitro selection, agronomic evaluation and genetic stability. Euphytica 48:141–152.
Jain S, Kumari S (2012). Herbicidal action on germination, amylase activity and gibberellin level in Cajanus cajan (L.). Bioscience Discovery 3: 232 -235.
Jaiwal PK, Gulati A (1995). Current status and future strategies of In vitro culture techniques for
genetic improvement of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek), Euphytica, 86: 167-181.
Jame YW, Cesnna AJ, Biederbeck VO, Grover R, Smith AE, Korven HC (1999). Herbicide residues and yield effects from repeated flood-irrigations of alfalfa with water containing
monouron or simazine. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences 79:639–645.
Janicka U, Mioduszewska H, Kielak E, Klocek J, Horbowicz M (2008). The effect of haloxyfop-ethoxyethyl on antioxidant enzyme activities and growth of wheat leaves (Triticum vulgare
L.). Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 17(4): 485-490.
Janiszowska W, Korczak G (1980). The intracellular distribution of tocopherols in Calendula officinalis leaves. Phytochemistry 19: 1391–1392.
Jordan MC, McHughen A (1987). Selection for chlorsulfuron resistance in flax (Linum
usitatissimum) cell cultures, Journal of Plant Physiology 131(3–4):333–338
Jung S (2003). Effect of norflurazon on responses of superoxide dismutase and catalase in a standard maize inbred line and superoxide dismutase mutant. Journal of Pesticide Science 28(3):281-
286.
Jung S, Chon S, Kuk Y, (2006). Differential antioxidant responses in catalase-deficient maize mutants exposed to norflurazon. Biologia Plantarum 50: 383-388.
Jung S, Kim JS, Cho KY, Tae GS, Kang BG (2000). Antioxidant responses of cucumber (Cucumis
sativus) to photoinhibition and oxidative stress induced by norflurazon under high and low
PPFDs Plant Science 153: 145–154.
Jyothi Lakshmi N, Vanaja M, SK Yadav, Maheswari M, Vagheera P, RP Reddy,
Venkateswarlu B (2013). Genotypic variation in growth and yield of blackgram (Vigna
mungo) genotypes in response to increased carbon dioxide concentration. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83(2).
Kamble SI (2008). Effect of glyphosate on linear growth of seedling and their anatomical characters
of Hibiscus cannabinus Linn. Biosciences, Biotechenology Research Asia 01/2008; 5:429-432.
Kanematsu S, Asada K (1989). CuZnsuperoxide dismutases in rice: occurrence of an active,
monomeric enzyme and two types of isozyme in leaf and non-photosynthetic tissues. Plant
and Cell Physiology 30:381-91.
Kanematsu S, Asada K (1990). Characteristic amino acid sequences of chloroplast and cytosol
isozymes of CuZn-superoxide dismutase in spinach, rice and horsetail. Plant and Cell
Physiology 31: 99-112
159
Kartha KK Gamborg OL (1978). Meristem culture techniques in the production of disease-free
plants and freeze-preservation of germplasm of tropical tuber crops and grain legumes. In, Maraite, H. and Meyer, J.A. (eds.). Diseases of Tropical Food Crops: 267-283. Université
Catholique, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Karthikeyan R, Davis LC, Erickson LE, Al-Khatib K, Kulakow PA, Barnes PL, Hutchinson
SL, Nurzhanova AA (2003). Studies on responses of non-target plants to pesticides: a review. A. Hazardous Substance Research Center, Kansas State University, Lawrence, 10.
Karuppanapandian T, Moon JC, Kim C, Manoharan K, Kim W (2011). Reactive oxygen species
in plants: their generation, signal transduction, and scavenging mechanisms. Australian
journal of crop science 5(6):709-725.
Kaushik S, Inderjit (2006). Phytotoxicity of selected herbicides to mung bean (Phaseolus aureus
Roxb.). Environmental and Experimantal Botany 55: 41-48.
Kavi Kishor PB, Hong Z, Miao G-H, Hu C-AA, Verma DPS (1995). Overexpression of 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmotolerance
in transgenic plants. Plant Physiology 108: 1387–1394.
Khalafalla MM, El-Shemy HA, Mizanur RS, Teraishi M, Teraishi M, Ishimoto M (2005). Recovery of herbicide-resistant Azuki bean [Vigna angularis (Wild.), Ohwi and Ohashi] plants via Agrobacterium- mediated transformation. African Journal of Biotechnology 4
(1):61-67.
Khan, MS, Chaudhry P, Wani PA, Zaidi A (2006). Biotoxic effects of the herbicides on growth, seed yield, and grain protein of greengram. Journal of Applied Science and Environment
Management 10 (3):141- 146.
Khatun MK, Haque MS, Islam S, KM Nasiruddin (2008). In vitro regeneration of mungbean
(Vigna radiata L.) from different explants. Progressive Agriculture 19(2): 13-19.
Khorami R, Safarnejad A (2011). In vitro selection of Foeniculum vulgare for salt tolerance Notulae Scientia Biologicae 3(2):90-97.
Kidd H, James DR, Eds (1991). The Agrochemicals Handbook, Third Edition. Royal Society of Chemistry Information Services, Cambridge, UK, (As Updated).10-2.
Kilinc M (2004). Effects of dicamba concentration on the embryo cultures of some bread wheat
(Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 18(2), 58-61.
Kim JH, Lee CH (2005). In vivo deleterious effects specific to reactive oxygen species on
photosystem I and II after photo-oxidative treatments of rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves. Plant
Science 168:1115–1125.
Kirti PB, Hadi S, Kumar PA, Chopra VL (1991). Production of sodium-chloride-tolerant Brassica
juncea plants by In vitro selection at the somatic embryo level. Theoretical and Applied
Genetics, 83(2):233-237.
Kishore GM, Shah DP (1988). Amino acid biosynthesis inhibitors as herbicides. Annual Review of
Biochemistry, 57(1): 627-663.
Kitchen LM, Witt WW, Rieck CE (1981). Inhibition of chlorophyll accumulation by glyphosate. Weed Science 29(4):513-516.
Koch AC Ramgareeb S, Snyman SJ, Watt MP, Rutherford RS (2009). Pursuing herbicide
tolerance in sugarcane: screening germplasm and induction through mutagenesis. In
Proceedings Annual Congress-South African Sugar Technologists' Association. South African Sugar Technologists' Association. No. 82: 629-632.
160
Kondić A, Šesek S (1998). In vitro selection of wheat genotypes for herbicide tolerance, In:
Proceedings of the Second Balkan Symposium on Field Crops, Novi Sad,Yugoslavia:169-171.
Kondić-Spika A, Jevtić R, N Hristov (2007). Ecological aspects of In vitro wheat herbicide
tolerance testing. In: The First International Congress on Food Technology, Quality. and
Safety/Symposium XVI on Cereal-Bread and Confectionery Products, Novi Sad, Serbia, 1- 6.
Kondic-Spika A, Petrovic K, Jevtic R, Kobiljski B, Pucarevi M (2009). Sulfonylurea tolerance of
wheat genotypes in zygotic embryo culture. Archives of Biological Sciences, Belgrade, 61 (3): 453-458.
Kosová K, Vítámvás P, Prášil IT, Renaut J (2011). Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress -
Contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. Journal of Proteomics,; 15 51-58.
Krishna Raj S, Sree Rangasamy SR (1993). In vitro Salt Tolerance Screening in Long-Term
Anther Cultures of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) variety IR 50. Journal of Plant Physiology
142(6):754–758.
Kulkarni M, Deshpande U (2007). In vitro screening of tomato genotypes for drought resistance
using polyethylene glycol. African Journal of Biotechnology 6 (6):691-696.
Kumar S (2012). Effect of herbicides on carbohydrate, protein and electrophoretic protein bands content in Triticum aestivum. International Journal of Food, Agriculture and Veterinary 2
(1):13-25.
Kumar V, Sharma AK, Singh VP, Kumar M. Q.Y. Shu (ed.) (2009). Induced Plant mutations in the genomics era. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome: 391-394.
Kwapata K, Nguyen T, Sticklen M (2012). Genetic transformation of common bean (Phaseolus
vulgaris L.) with the Gus color marker, the bar herbicide resistance, and the barley (Hordeum
vulgare) HVA1 drought tolerance genes. International Journal of Agronomy:1-8.
LaRosa PC, Singh NK, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA (1989). Stable NaCl tolerance of tobacco cells
is associated with enhanced accumulation of osmotion. Plant Physiolpgy 91(5): 855-861.
Laerke PE (1995). Foliar absorption of some glyphosate formulation and their efficacy on plants. Pesticide Science. 44:107-116
Langiano VDC, Martinez CBR (2008). Toxicity and effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide on the
Neotropical fish Prochilodus lineatus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C:
Toxicology Pharmacology 147: 222-231.
Lascano HR (2001). Antioxidant system response of different wheat cultivars under
drought: field and In vitro studies. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology; 28 1095 –
1102.
Lawrence GHM (1951). Taxonomy of Vascular Plants. Macmilliam Co., NY.
Laxmipathi Gowda CL, Srinivasan S, Gaur PM, Saxena KB (2013). P. K. Shetty, S. Ayyappan
and M. S. Swaminathan (eds). Climate Change and Sustainable Food Security, ISBN: 978-
81-87663-76-8, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore and Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi. 2013
Lee SH, An CS (2005). Differential expression of three catalase genes in hot pepper (Capsicum
annuum L.). Mol Cell 20: 247-255.
Lee TT (1981). Effects of glyphosate on synthesis and degradation of chlorophyll in soybean and
tobacco cells. Weed Research 21: 161–164.
161
Levall MW, Bornman JF (1993). Selection In vitro for UV‐tolerant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)
somaclones. Physiologia Plantarum, 88(1), 37-43.
Lewinsohn E, Gressel J (1984). Benzyl viologen-mediated counteraction of diquat and paraquat
phytotoxicities. Plant Physiology 76: 125-130.
Li X, Wu T, Huang H, Zhang S (2012). Atrazine accumulation and toxic responses in maize Zea mays Journal of Environmental Sciences, 24(2):203–208
Li Z, Wang H, Xu J, WU J, Ma G (2007). Response of rice varieties to bound residues of
metsulfuron-methyl in a paddy soil. Pedosphere 17: 487-492.
Ling X, Guo-Qing Z, Hong-Hui G, Yun H, Wei-Jun Z (2006). In vitro selection of herbicide
resistance in microspore-derived embryos of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) Chinese
Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology 3 (1): 33-38.
Link W, Abdelmula AA, Von Kittlitz E, Bruns S, Riemer H, Stelling D (1999). Genotypic
variation for drought tolerance in Vicia faba. Plant Breeding 118:477-483.
Liu, YW, Chou, WY, Wang CY (2005). In vitro induction of phosphinothricin tolerance in rice
(Oryza sativa). Plant Protection Bulletin (Taipei) 1: 47-58..
Lorraine-Colwill DF, Powles SB, Hawkes TR, Hollinshead PH, Warner SAJ, Preston C (2002). Investigations into the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in Lolium rigidum. Pesticide
Biochemistry and Physiology 74: 62-72.
Luan YS, Zhang J, Gao XR, An LJ (2007). Mutation induced by ethylmethanesulphonate
(EMS).In vitro screening for salt tolerance and plant regeneration of sweet potato (Ipomoea
batatas L.) Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 88:77–81.
Luck H (1963). Peroxidase. In: Bergmeyer HU, (Ed.), Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, Academic Press, Inc., New York. 895-897.
Lukatkin AS, Gar'kova AN, Bochkarjova AS, Nushtaeva OV, Teixeira da Silva JA (2013). Treatment with the herbicide TOPIK induces oxidative stress in cereal leaves. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 105(1):44-9.
Lukoki L, Marechal R, Otoul E (1980). Les ancetres sauvages des haricots cultives: Vigna radiata
L.Wilczek et V. mungo L. Hepper. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National de Belgique 50: 385-391.
Lyndon J, Darlington L (1998). Herbicide residues in leaves of Erythroxylum coca var. coca plants
treated with soil-applied tebuthiuron and hexazinone. Journal of Environmental Sciences and
Health B 33:581–594.
MacLean NL, Grant WF (1987). Evaluation of birdsfoot-trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) regenerated
plants following in vitro selection for herbicide tolerance. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:
1275–80.
Mahakavi T, Bakiyaraj R, Baskaran L, Rashid N, Sankar Ganesh K (2014). Effect of herbicide (Quizalofop-p-ethyl) on growth, photosynthetic pigments, enzymes and yield responses of black gram (Vigna mungo L.). International Letters of Natural Sciences cell and tissue cultures 4:58-65.
Malik AA, Li WG, Lou LN, Weng JH, Chen JF (2010). Biochemical/physiological
characterization and evaluation of in vitro salt tolerance in cucumber. African Journal of
Biotechnology, 9(22): 3298-3302.
Malone RP, Dix PJ (1990). Mutagenesis and triazine herbicide effects in strawberry shoot cultures. Journal of Experimental Botany 41(4):463-469.
Mansoor M, Ahmad HK, Khan H, Yaqoob M (2004). Development of economical weed
management strategies for mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek.). Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 10: 151-156.
162
Mao JQ, Zaidi MA, Aranson JT, Altosaar I (2006). In vitro regeneration of Vigna unguiculata
(L.) Walp. cv. Black eye cowpea via shoot organogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 87: 121-125.
Marechal R, Mascherpa JM, Stainer F (1978). Etude taxonomique d'un groupe complexe d'speces
des genres Phaseolus et Vigna Papilionaceae sur la base de donnees morphologiques et
polliniques, traitees par l'analyse informatique. Boissiera 28:1-273.
Marrs KA (1996). The functions and regulation of glutathuione S-transferases in plants.
Annual Reviws in Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47: 127-158.
Mathews H (1987). Morphogenetic responses from In vitro cultured seedling explants of mung bean
(Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek), Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 11(3): 233-240
Matters GL, Scandalios JG (1986). Effect of the free radical-generating herbicide paraquat
on the expression of the superoxide dismutase (Sod) genes in maize. Biochimica et
Biophysica Acta -General Subjects 882:29-38.
Mayfield A, Presser R (1998). Crop topping in pulses with paraquat and glyphosate for control of
annual ryegrass. Available at http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/PC_91673.html?s=0
McCord JM, Fridovich I (1969). Superoxide dismutase. An enzymic function for erythrocuprein (hemocupreln). Journal of Biological Chemistry 244:6049-55.
McLaren G, Don R (2002). The effect of glyphosate treatment on the germination potential of
resultant crops. In: Proceedings of Crop Protection in Northern Britain, Dundee 19-20 February, 103-108.
Menalled FD, Dyer WE (2006). Herbicide-Resistance Weeds. In: Weed Management Handbook
2006-2007. Mantana, Uta, Wyoming. Editors: Dewey, S. Enole, S. menalled, F., Miller, S., Whitsides, R. and Johnson, L.
Mendoza AB, Futsuhara Y (1990). Varietal differences on plant regeneration by tissue culture in
mungbean Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Japanese Journal of Breeding 40 (4): 457-467.
Menezes SMde, Tillmann MÂA, Dode LB, Villela FA (2004). Detection of soybean genetically modified for tolerance of glyphosate based on the activity of enzymes. Revista Brasileira de
Sementes 26:150-155.
Meredith CP, PS Carlson (1982). Herbicide resistance in plant cell cultures. In Herbicide
resislance in plants. H.M. LeBaron and J. Gressel, eds. John Wiley, N.Y. pp. 275-291 .
Meschede DK, Velini ED, Carbonari CA, Silva JRM (2011). Physiological alteration in sugarcane
influenced by Glyphosate and Sulfumeturon-Methyl application. Planta daninha. 29 (2):413-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582011000200019.
Metwally A, Safronova VI, Belimov AA, Dietz KJ (2005). Genotypic variation of the response to
cadmium toxicity in Pisum sativum L. Journal of Experimental Botany 56,409:167–178.
Michałowicz J, Duda W (2009). The effects of 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol on some antioxidative
parameters and the activity of glutathione s-transferase in reed canary grass leaves (Phalaris
arudinacea). Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 18(5): 845-852.
Michler CH (1988). Herbicide-tolerant forest trees via In vitro selection. Agricell Report 10 (4): 27.
Michler CH, Haissig BE (1988). Increased herbicide tolerance of In vitro selected hybrid poplar. pp.
183–189 in Ahuja, M.R. 1988 (ed.) “Somatic cell genetics of woody plants. Proceedings of
the IUFRO Working Party S2.04–07 Somatic Cell Genetics, held in Grosshansdorf, Federal Republic of Germany, August 10–13, 1987.” Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht/Boston/London.
163
Milligan AS, Daly A, Parry MAJ, Lazzeri PA, Jepson I (2001). The expression of a maize
glutathione S-transferase gene in transgenic wheat confers herbicide tolerance, both in planta and in vitro. Molecular Breeding 7, 301-315.
Mishra V, Srivastava, G, Prasad, SM, Abraham, G (2008). Growth, photosynthetic pigments and
photosynthetic activity during seedling stage of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in response to
UV-B and dimethoate. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 92(1):30-37.
Mohamed EA, Iwaki T, Munir I, Tamoi M, Shigeoka S, Wadano A (2003). Overexpression of
bacterial catalase in tomato leaf chloroplasts enhances photo-oxidative stress tolerance. Plant
Cell and Environment 26: 2037-2046.
Mohammed AN, Alsadon AA, Alharbi MA, Wahb-allah, Rahman MH (2006). Salinity tolerance
of tomato cultivars using in vitro techniques. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 760: XXVII
International Horticultural Congress – IHC:II International Symposium on Plant Genetic Resources of Horticultural Crops.
Moldes CA, Medici LO, Abrahão OS, Tsai SM, Azevedo RA (2008). Biochemical responses of
glyphosate resistant and susceptible soybean plants exposed to glyphosate Acta Physiologiae
Plantarum 30(4): 469-479.
Mongomaké K, Hilaire KT, Daouda K, Michel Z, Justin KY, Ochatt SJ (2009). In vitro plantlets
regeneration in bambara groundnut Vigna subterranea (l.) Verdc. (Fabaceae) through direct
shoot bud differentiation hypocotyl and epicotyl cuttings. African Journal of Biotechnology 8 (8):1466-1473.
Monsanto(http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/products/productivity/roundup/gly_halflife_
bkg).pdf, 2005.
Montillet JL, Chamnongpol S, Rustérucci C, Dat J, de Cotte BV, Agnel JP, Battesti C, Inzé D,
Breusegem FV, Triantaphylides C (2005). Fatty acid hydroperoxides and H2O2 in the
execution of hypersensitive cell death in tobacco leaves, Plant Physiology 138: 1516-1526.
Mony SA, Haque MS, Alam MM, Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K (2010). Regeneration of black gram (Vigna mungo L.) on changes of hormonal condition. Notulae Botanicae Horti
Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 38(3):140-145.
Mony SA, Haque MS, MA Karim, Roy SK (2008). Callus induction and plantlet regeneration in blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) Progressive Agriculture 19(2): 27-35.
Moraru I, Petcu E, Rãducanu F (1997). In vitro screening for frost resistance of some winter wheat
genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) Romanian Agricultural Research 7-8:69-74.
Mukhopadhyay A, Bhojwani SS (1978). Shoot-bud differentiation in tissue cultures of leguminous plants. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie Bd. 88: 263–268.
Mungala AJ, Radhakrishnan T, Dobaria JR (2008). In vitro screening of 123 indian peanut
cultivars for sodium chloride induced salinity tolerance. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4 (5): 574-582.
Murashige T, F Skoog (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth on bioassay with tobacco tissue
cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15:473-497.
Murray BG, Friesen LF, Beaulieu KJ, Morrison IN (1996). A Seed bioassay to identify acetyl-
coa carboxylase inhibitor resistant wild oat (Avena fatua). Populations Weed Technology
10(1): 85-89.
Muruganantham M, Amutha S, Selvaraj N, Vengadesan G, Ganapathi A (2007). Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Vigna mungo using immature cotyledonary-node
explants and phosphinothricin as the selection agent. In vitro Cellular and Devlopmental
Biology—Plant 43:550–557.
164
Muruganantham M, Ganapathi A, Amutha S, Vengadesan G, Selvaraj N, (2005) Shoot
regeneration from immature cotyledonary nodes in black gram. Indian Journal of Biotechnology 4(4): 551-555.
Nacheva L, Rankova Z, Gercheva P (2010). In vitro model system for evaluation of fruit plants
stress responses to soil herbicide treatment. Conference paper / Journal article; Agrarni
Nauki 2010 Vol. 2 No. 4 pp. 93-96 Conference Title Scientific Workshop on Investigations of some Stress Responses and Selection of Tolerant Genotypes in Basic Agricultural Crops,
Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 11-12 June 2010.
Nakajima Y, Yoshida S, Ono T (1996). Differential effects of urea triazine-type and phenoltype photosystem II inhibitors on inactivation of the electron transport and degradation of the D1
protein during photon inhibition. Plant Cell and Physiology 37:673.
Nandan B, Sharma BC, Kumar A, Sharma V (2011). Efficacy of pre and post emergence herbicides on weed flora of urd bean under rainfed subtropical Shiwalik foothills of Jammu
and Kashmir. Indian Journal of Weed Science 43(3-4): 172-174.
Narain K, Bhat MM, Abhilash PC, Yunus M (2012). Impact of distillery effluent on seedling
growth and pigment concentration of Cicer arietinum L. Journal of Environmental Research and Development 6 (3A):601-608.
Nasir IA, Tabassum B, Qamar Z, Javed MA, Tariq M, Farooq AM, SJ Butt, Qayyum A,
Husnain T (2014). Herbicide-tolerant sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plants: an unconventional method of weed removal. Turkish Journal of Biology (2014) 38:1-11
Nasrabadi M, Ghayal N, Dhumal KN. (2011). Effect of chloropyrifos and malathion on antioxidant
enzymes in tomato and brinjal, International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences 2(2):202-209.
Nedev T, Dimitrov B, Kruleva M, Krapchev B, Nencheva D (2003). Screening of herbicide
resistance in maize calli in vitro, Sofia, Bulgaria Institute of Genetics, Bulgarian Academy
of Sciences Kostinbrod, Bulgaria AgroBio Institute. (http://www.agron.missouri.edu/mnl/77/27nedev.html).
Nehru SD, Rangaiah S, Ramarao G, Shekar GC (1999). Effect of some herbicides on seed
germination and seedlings vigour in mungbean. Crop Research 17 (3) : 425-426.
Nemat Alla MM, Hassan NM (2006). Changes of antioxidants levels in two maize lines following
atrazine treatments. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 44(4):202-10.
Nemat Alla MM, Hassan NM (2007). Changes of antioxidants and GSH-associated enzymes in
isoproturon-treated maize. Acta Physiologia Plantarum 29:247–258.
Nemat Alla MM, Badawi AM, Hassan NM, El-Bastawisy ZM, Badran EG (2008a). Effect of
metribuzin, butachlor and chlorimuron-ethyl on amino acid and protein formation in wheat
and maize seedlings, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 90:8–18.
Nemat Alla MM, Hassan NM, El-Bastawisy ZM (2008b). Changes in antioxidants and kinetics of
glutathione-Stransferase of maize in response to isoproturon treatment. Plant Biosystems
142:5-16.
Norsworthy JK, Burgos NR, LR Oliver (2001). Differences in weed tolerance to glyphosate
involve different mechanisms. Weed Technology 15: 725-731.
O' Makinwa RO, Akinyemiju OA, (1990). Control of Euphoria heterophylla L. in cowpea with
herbicides and herbicide mixtures. Crop Protection 9(3): 218-224
Ober ES, Luterbacher MC (2002). Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Beta vulgaris.
Annals of Botany 89:917-924.
165
Ochatt SJ, Marconi PL, Radice S (1998). In vitro recurrent selection of potato: production and
characterization of salt tolerant cell lines and plants Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 55 (1):1-8.
O'Donovan, JT, Rashid A, Van NH, Newman JC, Khan A, Johnson CI, Blackshaw
RE, Harker KN (1996). A seedling bioassay for assessing the response of wild oat (Avena
fatua) populations to triallate. Weed Technology 10(4):931-935.
Odutayo OI, Akinrimisi FB, Ogunbosoye I, Oso RT (2005). Multiple shoot induction from
embryo derived callus cultures of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Walp. African Journal of
Biotechnology, 4(11): 1214-1216.
Okuda T, Matsuda Y, Sugawara M, Sagisaka S (1992). Metabolic response to treatment with cold,
paraquat, or 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole in leaves of winter wheat. Bioscience, Biotechnology,
and Biochemistry 56(12):1911-1915.
Olorunmaiye KS (2010). Reproductive performance of two cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp)
varieties Ife brown and TVX3236 as influenced by Imidazolinone and Dinitroaniline
herbicides. Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering 101-105
Ozlem (Dalgic) A, Dane F (2007). The effects of Fusilade (fluaziop-p-butyl) on root and shoot growth of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) seedlings. Journal of Applied Biological Sciences1
(3): 9-13.
Palama T, Menard P, Fock I, Bourdon E., Govinden-Soulange J, Bahut M, Payet B, Verpoorte R, Kodja H (2010). Shoot differentiation from protocorm callus cultures of Vanilla
planifolia (Orchidaceae): proteomic and metabolic responses at early stage. BMCP Plant
Biology 10 82.
Parani K (1999). Effect of herbicide Machete on growth and metabolism of early seedlings of Vigna
radiata and Vigna mungo. Journal of Ecobiology 11: 253-257.
Parida AK, Das AB (2005). Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicology
and Environmental Safety 60:324-349.
Park SY, Ryu SH, Jang IC, Kwon SY, Kim JG, Kwak SS (2004). Molecular cloning of a
cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase cDNA from cell cultures of sweetpotato and its expression in
response to stress. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 271: 339-346.
Parker WB, Somers DA, Wyse DL, Keith RA, Burton JD, Gronwald JW, Gengenbach BG
(1990). Selection and characterization of sethoxydim-tolerant maize tissue cultures Plant
Physiology. 92, 1220-1225.
Parween T, Jan S, Mahmooduzzafar, Fatma T (2012). Evaluation of oxidative stress in Vigna radiata L. in response to chlorpyrifos, International Journal of Environmental Science and
Technology 9(4) 9:605-612.
Patade VY, Suprasanna P, Bapat VA (2006). Selection for abiotic (salinity and drought) Stress tolerance and molecular characterization of tolerant lines in sugarcane. Issue no .BARC
News Letter Issue 273 2006).
Patil VS, Shaikh NR, Vishwas PS (2012). Effect of different herbicides on the nodulation property of rhizobial isolates. Universal Journal of Environmental Research and Technology. 2(4):
293-299.
Pellegrineschi A (1997). In vitro plant regeneration via organogenesis of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata
(L.) Walp.] Plant Cell Reports, 17, 2:89-95.
Perez A and Kogan M (2003). Glyphosate resistant Lolium multiflorum in Chilean orchards. Weed
Research; 43: 12–19.
Pérez-Clemente RM and Gómez-Cadenas A, (2012). In vitro tissue culture, a tool for the study and breeding of plants subjected to abiotic stress conditions, Recent Advances in Plant In vitro
166
Culture, Dr. Annarita Leva (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0787-3, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/50671.
Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/recent-advances-in-plant-in-vitro-culture/in-vitro-tissue-culture-a-tool-for-the-study-and-breeding-of-plants-subjected-to-
abiotic-stress-cond.
Perez-Jones A (2007). PhD thesis entitled “Glyphosate-Resistance in Italian Ryegrass (Lolium
multiflorum): Evaluation and Investigation of the Mechanisms of Resistance”.
Perl A, Perl-Treves R, Galili S, Aviv D, Shalgi E, Malkin S, Galun E (1993). Enhanced oxidative-
stress defense in transgenic potato expressing tomato Cu, Zn superoxide dismutases.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 85(5):568-576.
Pfeilstetter E, Matzk A, Feldmann SD, Schiemann J (2000). Rapid and efficient screening of
phosphinothricin tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus) with a novel germination test.
Euphytica 113: 119–124.
Phillips GC, Collins GB (1979). In vitro tissue culture of selected legumes and plant regeneration
from callus cultures of red clover. Crop Science 19: 59-64.
Pieniazek D, Bukowska B, Duda W (2004). Comparison of the effect of Roundup Ultra 360 SL
pesticide and its active compound glyphosate on human erythrocytes. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 79: 58-63.
Pinto JEBP, Dyer WE, Weller SC, Herrmann KM (1988). Glyphosate induces 3-deoxy-d-
arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cells grown in suspension culture. Plant Physiology 87: 891-893.
Pline-Srnic W (2006). Physiological mechanisms of glyphosate resistance. Weed Technology
20(2):290-300.
Pofelis S, (1991). M.Sc. thesis entitled “The development of sulfonylurea herbicide resistant
birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) plants from In vitro selection” submitted to Department
of Biology McGill University Montreal.
Polisetty R, Paul V, Deveshwar JJ, Khetarpal S, Suresh K, Chandra R (1997). Multiple shoot induction by benzyladenine and complete plant regeneration from seed explants of chickpea
(Cicer arietinum L.) Plant Cell Reports 16: 565–571.
Potters G, Pasternak TP, Guisez Y, Palme KJ, Jansen MAK (2007). Stress-induced morphogenic responses: growing out of trouble?. Trends in Plant Science 12(3): 98-105.
Powles SB, Preston C (2006). Evolved glyphosate resistance in plants: biochemical and genetic
basis of resistance. Weed Technology 20:282–289.
Prather TS, Ditomaso JM, Holt JS (2000). Herbicide Resistance: Definition and Management Strategies. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
Publication 8012:1-14.
Prem Anand R, Ganapathi A, Vengadesan G, Selvaraj N, Anbazhagan VR, Kulothungan S (2001). Plant regeneration from immature cotyledon-derived callus of Vigna unguiculata
(L.) Walp (cowpea). Current Science 80(5):671-674.
Preston C, Mallory-Smith CA (2001). Biochemical mechanisms, inheritance, and molecular genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. In S. Powles and D. Shaner, eds. Herbicide
resistance and world grains. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc, pp 23-60.
Preston C (2004). Herbicide resistance in weeds endowed by enhanced detoxification: complications
for management. Weed Science 52:448-453.
Purohit M, Srivastava S, Srivastava PS (1998). Stress tolerant plants through tissue culture. In:
Srivastava, P.S. (Ed.), Plant Tissue Culture and Molecular Biology: Application and
Prospects. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi :554–578.
167
Pyon, JY, Piao RZ, Roh SW, Shin SY, Kwak SS (2004). Differential levels of antioxidants in
paraquat-resistant and susceptible Erigeron canadensis biotypes in Korea. Weed Biology and Management 4: 75–80.
Qian H, Chen W, Sheng GD, Xu X, Liu W, Fu Z (2008). Effects of glufosinate on antioxidant
enzymes, subcellular structure, and gene expression in the unicellular green alga Chlorella
vulgari. Aquatic toxicology, 88(4):301-307.
Queiros F, Fidalgo F, Santos I, Salema R (2007). In vitro selection of salt tolerant cell lines in
Solanum tuberosum L. Biologia Plantarum 51 (4): 728-734.
Rabinowitch HD, Clare DA, Crapo JD, Fridovich I (1983). Positive correlation between superoxide dismutase and resistance to paraquat toxicity in the green alga Chlorella
sorokiniana. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics, 225(2), 640-648.
Racchi ML, Rebecchi M, Todesco G, Nielsen E, Forlani G (1995). Glyphosate tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.)- selection and characterization of a tolerant somaclone. Euphytica, 82(2), 165-
173.
Rad MH, Aivazi AA, S Jagannath (2011). Cytogenetic and biochemical effects of imazethapyr in
wheat (Triticum durum). Turkish Journal of Biology 35 663-670.
Radetski CM, Cotelle S, Fe´rard JF (2000). Classical and biochemical endpoints in the evaluation
of phytotoxic effects caused by the herbicide trichloroacetate. Environmental and
Experimental Botany 44:221–229.
Raducanu F (2004). Preliminary results regarding In vitro screening for roundup resistance in
sunflower. Romanian agricultural research Number 21:39-47.
Rai MK, Kalia RK, Singh R, Gangola MP, Dhawan AK (2011). Developing stress tolerant plants through In vitro selection—An overview of the recent progress. Environmental and
Experimental Botany; 71 89-98.
Rajasekaran K, Grula JW, Anderson DM (1996). Selection and characterization of mutant cotton
(Gossypium hirsutum L.) cell lines resistant to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Plant Science 119(1):115-124.
Rajashekar N, Prakasha, Shivashankara Murthy TC (2012). Seed germination and physiological
behavior of maize (cv. Nac-6002) seedlings under abiotic stress (Pendimethalin) condition. Asian Journal of Crop Science 4: 80-85.
Ralph PJ (2000). Herbicide toxicity of Halophila ovalis assessed by chlorophyll a fluorescence.
Aquatic Botany 66:141–152.
Rao AS, Rao S, Ratnam M (2010). Bio-efficacy of sand mix application of preemergence herbicides alone and in sequence with Imazethapyr on weed control in relay crop of black
gram. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 16 (3): 279-285.
Rao S, Naidu MM (1989). A tissue culture derived pesticide tolerant line of chickpea Cicer arietinum L. Proceedings: Plant Sciences 99: 523-527.
Rao S, Patil P, Kaviraj CP (2005). Callus induction and organogenesis from various explants in
Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Indian Journal of Biotechnology, 4(4), 556-560.
Rathi JPS, Tewari AN, Kumar M (2004). Integrated weed management in black gram (Vigna
mungo L.). Indian Journal of Weed Science 36 (3 and 4):218-220.
Reddy A, Bantilan MCS, Mohan G. (2013). Pulses production scenario: policy and technological
options. policy brief. (www.researchgate.net/...Production.../9c960519cc8b6de845.pdf).
Reddy KN, Hoagland RE, Zablotowicz RM (2001). Effect of glyphosate on growth, chlorophyll,
and nodulation in glyphosate-resistant and susceptible soybean (glycine max) varieties.
Journal of New Seeds 2(3):37-52.
168
Reddy KN, Rimando AM, Duke SO (2004). Aminomethylphosphonic acid, a metabolite of
glyphosate, causes injury in glyphosate-treated, glyphosate-resistant soybean. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 52: 5139-5143.
Romero DM, Molina RMCd, Juarez AB (2011). Oxidative stress induced by a commercial
glyphosate formulation in a tolerant strain of Chlorella kessleri Ecotoxicology and
Environmental Safety 74:741–747.
Roudsari MF, Salmanian AH, Mousavi A, Sohi HH, Jafari M (2009). Regeneration of
glyphosate-tolerant Nicotiana tabacum after plastid transformation with a mutated variant of
bacterial aroA gene. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology 7(4):247-253.
Roy M, Mandal N, Das PK (2003). Plantlet regeneration in black gram from callus culture and
effect of genotype, explant and media composition. Legume Research 26(4):259-263.
Rubin JL, Gaines CG, and Jensen RA (1982). Enzymological basis for herbicidal action of glyphosate. Plant physiology 70(3):833-839.
Rudulie DL, Strom AR, Dandekar AM, Smith LT, Valentine RC (1984). Molecular biology of
osmoregulation Science. 224:1064-1068.
Rutherford WA, Krieger-Liszkay A (2001). Herbicide-induced oxidative stress in photosystem II. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 26: 648-653.
Saini R, Jaiwal PK (2002). Age, position in mother seedling, orientation, and polarity of the
epicotyl segments of blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) determines its morphogenic response. Plant Science, 163(1), 101-109.
Saini R, Jaiwal PK (2005). Efficient transforma tion of a recalcitrant grain legume Vigna mungo L.
Hepper via Agrobacterium- mediated gene transfer into shoot apical meristem cultures. Plant Cell Reports 24:164-171.
Saini R, Jaiwal S, Jaiwal PK (2003). Stable genetic transformation of Vigna mungo L. Hepper via
Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Reports 21(9):851-859.
Sakhanokho HF, Kelley RY (2009). Influence of salicylic acid on In vitro propagation and salt tolerance in Hibiscus acetosella and Hibiscus moscheutos (cv ‘Luna Red’). African Journal
of Biotechnology; 8 1474–1481.
Sakthivelu G, Akitha Devi, Giridhar P, Rajasekaran T, Ravishankar GA, Nedev T, Kosturkova G (2008). Drought-induced alterations in growth, osmotic potential and In vitro regeneration
of soybean cultivars. General and Applied Plant Physiology, 34(1-2), 103-112.
Saladin C, Clement C, Magn C (2003b). Stress effects of flumioxazin herbicide on grapevine
(Vitis vinifera L.) grown in vitro. Plant Cell Reports 21:1221–1227.
Saladin G, Magne C, Clement C (2003a). Stress reactions in Vitis vinifera L. following soil
application of the herbicide flumioxazin. Chemosphere 53:199–206.
Salazar LC, Appleby AP (1982). Germination and growth of grasses and legumes from seeds treated with glyphosate and paraquat. Weed Science 30(3):235-237.
Salin ML (1988). Toxic oxygen species and protective systems of the chloroplast. Physiologia
Plantarum, 72(3): 681–689.
Samantaray S, Rout GR, Das P (1999). In vitro selection and regeneration of zinc tolerant calli
from Setaria italica L. Plant science, 143(2), 201-209.
Sammaiah D, Chandra Shekar Ch, Prasad VR, Reddy KJ (2011a). Pesticides induced alterations
in physiological responses in Solanum melongena L. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences 2(1):374-384.
169
Sammaiah D, Chandra Shekar Ch., Goud MJP, Reddy KJ (2011b). In vitro selection of pesticide
tolerance and regeneration of plantlets in Solanum melongena L. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Research 1(1): 66-70.
Sandermann H (2006). Plant biotechnology: ecological case studies on herbicide resistance. Trends
in Plant Sciences 11: 324-328.
Santos LD, Ferreira FA, Meira RMS A, Barros NF, Ferreira LR, Machado AFL (2005). Leaf growth and morphoanatomy of eucalypt under the effect of glyphosate drift. Planta Daninha
3: 133-142.
Sarsag M, Unal M (2004). The effects of sultan 70 wg on stomatal function. Biotechnol. and Biotechnol. Eq. 18/2004/2:104 -111.
Sauerborn J, Müller-Stöver D, Hershenhorn J (2007). The role of biological control in managing
parasitic weeds. Journal of Crop Protection 26: 246-254.
Saunders JW, Acquaah G, Renner KA, Doley WP (1992). Monogenic dominant sulfonylurea
resistance in sugarbeet from somatic cell selection. Crop science, 32(6), 1357-1360.
Saxena MC, Subramaniyam KK, Yadav DS (1976). Chemical and mechanical control of weeds in
gram. Pantnagar Journal of Research 1: 112-116.
Saxena RP and Beg MU (1988). Selection of endosulfan-tolerant gram cell line. Plant Cell, Tissue
and Organ Culture 2(3):273-277.
Scarponi L, Younis ME, Standardi A, Martinet A, Hassan NM (1998). Changes in carbohydrate formation and stress symptoms in Vicia faba L. treated with propachlor, chlorimuron-ethyl
and imazelhapyr. Agr Med 128:118–125
Sen J and Mukherjee SG (1998). In vitro induction of multiple shoots and plant regeneration in Vigna. In vitro Cellular and Devlopmental Biology- Plant, 34: 276–280.
Sergiev IG, Alexieva VS, Ivanov SV, Moskova IA, Karanov EN (2006). The phenylurea cytokinin
4PU-30 protects maize plants against glyphosate action. Pesticide Biochemistry and
Physiology 85: 139–146.
Shahrtash M, Mohsenzadeh S, Mohabatkar H (2011). Salicylic acid alleviates paraquat oxidative
damage in maize seedling. Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences 2(3): 377-382.
Shaner DL (2000). The impact of glyphosate-tolerant crops on the use of other herbicides and on resistance management. Pest Managment Science 56: 320–326.
Shan-guo MAO (2008). Influences of isoproturon and tribenuron-methyl on the growth and mda
content in the leaves of rice seedlings, Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences 36(6), 2209.
Shankhadhar D, Shankhdhar SC, Mani SC, Pant RC (2000). In vitro selection for salt tolerance in rice. Biologia Plantarum 43(3):477-480.
Shanthi P, Jebaraj S, Geetha S (2010). In vitro screening for salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa).
Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1(4):1208-1212.
Sharma SS, Dietz KJ (2006). The significance of amino acids and amino acid-derived molecules in
plant responses and adaptation to heavy metal stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 57:
711-726.
Shaukat SS, Khan NA, Ahmad F (1980). Herbicide influence on germination and seedling growth
of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and V. radiata(L.) Wilczek. Pakistan Journal of Botany 12(1):
97-106.
Shekhawat VS, Shaktawat MS, Tanwar SPS (2002). Effect of weed management on growth and productivity of maize-blackgram intercropping system. Agricultural Science Digest 22(1) 36-
38.
170
Shimina VS, Neelamegam R (2009). Effect of herbicide Excel Mera-71 foliar spray treatment on
black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) var. T-9. Plant Archives 9(1):267-272.
Shyr YYJ, Hepburn AG, Widhoh JM (1992). Glyphosate selected amplification of the 5-
enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase gene in cultured carrot cells. Molecular and
General Genetics 232(3):377-382.
Si P, Yan G, Kamsan MA, Adhikari KN (2012). Genotypic variation of metribuzin and carfentrazone-ethyl tolerance among yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.) germplasm. New
Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 40(1): 43-54.
Singh AK, Sharma DR (2008). In vitro screening and regeneration of water stress tolerant culture of
tomato. Indian Journal of Plant Physioligy 13(1):23-28.
Singh G (2011). Weed Management in summer and kharif season black gram Vigna mungo (L.)
Hepper Indian Journal of Weed Science 43 (1 and 2): 77-80 (2011).
Singh NB, Yadav K, Amist N (2012). Mitigating effects of salicylic acid against herbicidal stress.
Journal of Stress Physiology and Biochemistry 8(4):27-35.
Singh, VK and Singh RP (1988). Chemical weed control in blackgram (Vigna mungo L.).Indian Journal of Weed Science 20 (4):81-82.
Sloan ME and Camper ND (1981). Trifluralin effects on carrot callus tissue. Pesticide
Biochemistry and Physiology.15. 3 :201-208.
Smirnoff N and Cumbes QJ (1989). Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of compatible solutes.
Phytochemistry 28:1057-1060.
Smith MK, McComb JA (1983). Selection for NaCl tolerance in cell cultures of Medicago sativa
and recovery of plants from NaCl-tolerant cell lines. Plant Cell Reports 2:126–128.
Smith RH, Bhaskaran S, Miller FR (1985). Screening for drought tolerance in Sorghum using cell
culture. In vitro Cellular and Devlopmental Biology 21:541–545.
Solís-Marroquín D, Lecona-Guzmán CA, Adriana Canto-Flick, Jericó Jabín Bello-Bello and Nancy Santana-Buzzy, Lourdes Iglesias-Andreu (2011). In vitro selection of a salt-
tolerant embryogenic line in habanero pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) Horticulture
Science 46(12):1666-1671.
Soltani N, Shropshire C, Robinson DE, Sikkema PH (2005). Sensitivity ofAdzuki Bean (Vigna
angularis) to Preplant-Incorporated Herbicides. Weed Technology 19:897-901.
Song NH, Yin XL, Chen GF, Yang H (2007). Biological responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum)
plants to the herbicide chlorotoluron in soils. Chemosphere. 68:1779-87.
Soni KC and Singh H (1988). Weed management in urd bean (Vigna mungo L Hopper). Indian
Journal of Weed Science 20(3):33 -37.
Sorkheh K, Shiran B, Khodambshi M, Rouhi V, Ercisli S. (2011). In vitro assay of native Iranian almond species (Prunus L. spp.) for drought tolerance. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture
105:395–404.
Sprecher SL, Stewart AB, Brazil JM (1993). Peroxidase changes as indicators of herbicide induced
stress in aquatic plants. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 31:45-45.
Srilatha T (2014). Direct plant regeneration from cotyledonary explants of blackgram (Vigna mungo
L.) Hepper. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences 5 (2)(B):491 – 497.
Srivastava P, Pandey A (2011). Standardization of callus induction and plant regeneration from leaf explants of black gram (Vigna mungo var. silvestris). International Journal of Innovations in
Biological and Chemical Sciences 1: 1-6.
Srivastave A, Tel-Or E (1991). Effect of some environmental pollutants on the superoxide dismutase activity in Lemna. Free Radical Research Communications 12-13: 601-607.
171
Stajner D, Popovic M, Stajner M (2003). Herbicide induced oxidative stress in lettuce, beans, pea
seeds and leaves. Biologia Plantarum 47 (4): 575-579.
Steinrucken HC, Amrhein N (1980). The herbicide glyphosate is a potent inhibitor of 5-
enolpyruvyl-shikimic acid-3-phosphate synthase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 94:
1207-1212.
Streibig JC (2003). Chapter 1 Assessment of herbicide effects (www.ewrs.org/et/docs/herbicide_interaction.pdf).
Sulmon C, Gouesbet G, Couée I, El Amrani A (2004). Sugar-induced tolerance to atrazine in
Arabidopsis seedlings: interacting effects of atrazine and soluble sugars on psbA mRNA and
D1 protein levels. Plant Science 167: 913-923.
Sulmon C, Gouesbet G, El Amrani A, Couée I (2007). Involvement of the ethylene-signalling
pathway in sugar-induced tolerance to the herbicide atrazine in Arabidopsis thaliana
seedlings. Journal of Plant Physiology 164: 1083-1092.
Swanson EB, Coumans MP, Brown GL, Patel JD, Beversdorf WD (1988). The characterization
of herbicide tolerant plants in Brassica napus L. after In vitro selection of microspores and
protoplasts Plant Cell Reports 7:83-87.
Swartzberg D, Izhar S, Beckmann JS (1985). Tobacco callus line tolerant to amitrole: selection,
regeneration of plants and genetic analysis. J.Plant Physiol. 121, 29–35.
Tan S, Evans R, Singh B (2006). Herbicidal inhibitors of amino acid biosynthesis and
herbicide-tolerant crops. Amino Acids 30:195–204.
Tateishi Y (1996). Systematics of the species of Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis. In "Mungbean
Germplasm: Collection, Evaluation and Utilization for Breeding Program" JIRCAS Working Report No.2. pp.9-24. Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Science
(JIRCAS), Japan.
Tateshi T, Shun T, Masaki Y, Yoriko T, Shin'ya K (2001). Plant peroxidase over-production in tobacco induce herbicide-tolerance. Proceedings Lignin Symposium 46
th: 31-34.
Taylor SG, Shilling DG, Quesenberry KH (1989). In vitro selection for 2, 4-D tolerance in red
clover. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 78(2):265-270.
Teli NP, Maheshwari VL (2001). Plant tissue culture studies of Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek and
Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper, Perspectives in biotechnology. Proceedings of a national
symposium, Warangal, India, 26-27 February 1999:125-129
Tewary PK, Sharma A, Raghunath MK, Sarkar A (2000). In vitro response of promising mulberry (Morus sp.) genotypes for tolerance to salt and osmotic stresses. Plant Growth
Regulation (1):7-21.
Thirumaran D, Xavier A (1987). Effect of methyl parathion (Metacid 50) on growth, protein free amino acid and total phenol content of black gram (Vigna mungo L.) seedlings. Indian
Journal of Plant Physiology 30:289-292(3).
Thomas BR, Pratt D (1982). Isolation of paraquat-tolerant mutants from tomato cell cultures.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 63(2):169-176.
Toldi O, Tóth S, Oreifig AS, Kiss E, Jenes B (2000). Production of phosphinothricin-tolerant rice
(Oryza sativa L.) through the application of phosphinothricin as growth regulator. Plant Cell
Reports 19(12):1226-1231.
Tong XH, Daud MK, Zhu SJ (2010). Selection and characterization of a novel glyphosate-tolerant
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) mutant (R1098). Plant Breeding, 129: 192–196.
Torres AC, Nagata RT, Ferl RJ, TA Bewick, Cantliffe DJ (1999). In vitro assay selection of glyphosate resistance in lettuce. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 124(1):86–89.
172
Tranel PJ, TR Wright (2002). Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: what have we
learned? Weed Science 50:700-712.
Trovato M, Mattioli R, Costantino P (2008). Multiple roles of proline in plant stress tolerance and
development, Rendiconti Lincei 19:325-346.
Tsaneva IR, Weiss B (1990). soxR, a locus governing a superoxide response regulon in Escherichia
coil K-12. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4197-4205.
Tsang EWT, Bowler C, Herouart W, Van Camp R, Villarroel C, Genetello, Van Montagu M,
Inze D (1991). Differential regulation of superoxide disrnutase in plants exposed to
environmental stress. Plant Cell 3: 783-792.
Tu M, Hurd C, Randall JM (2001). Weed control methods handbook, the nature conservancy,
http://tncinvasives.ucdavis.edu, Version: April 2001).
Turhan H, Baser I (2004). In vitro and in vivo water stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Helia. 27(40):227-236.
Turner RG, Marshal C (1972). Accumulation of zinc by subcellular root of Agrostis tannis Sibth.
in relation of zinc tolerance. New Phytologist., 71: 671-676.
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1992). Pesticide tolerance for glyphosate. Fed. Regist. 57: 8739 40, 1992.10-98.
Van Der Vyver C, Conradie T, Kossmann J, Lloyd, J. (2013). In vitro selection of transgenic
sugarcane callus utilizing a plant gene encoding a mutant form of acetolactate synthase. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant, 49(2), 198-206.
Van Le BUI, Cruz de Carvalho MH, Zuily-Fodil, Thi ATP, Van KTT (2002). Direct whole plant
regeneration of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] from cotyledonary node thin cell layer explants. Journal of plant physiology, 159(11), 1255-1258.
Van Rensburg L, Krüger GHJ, Krüger H (1993). Proline accumulation as drought-tolerance
selection criterion: its relationship to membrane integrity and chloroplast ultrastructure in
Nicotiana tabacum L.. Journal of Plant Physiology, 141, 188–194.
Vargas RN, Wright SD (2004). Herbicide resistance management. In : Cotton Field Check.
Cooperative Extension Bulletin. UC Davis. USA.\
Vats S, Solanki P, Alam A (2014). Efficient In vitro regeneration of Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Researcher 6(1) :12-15.
Venkataiah P, Christopher T, Karampuri S (2005). Selection of atrazine-resistant plants by In
vitro mutagenesis in pepper (Capsicum annuum) Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture
83(1):75-82.
Verdcourt B (1970). Studies in the Leguminosae - Papilionoideae for the "Flora of Tropical East
Africa": IV. Kew Bulletin 24:.559.
Vijayan K, Chakraborti SP, Ghosh PD (2004). Screening of mulberry (Morus spp.) for salinity tolerance through In vitro seed germination. Indian Journal of Biotechnology, 3, 47-51.
Vijayan S, Beena MR, Kirti PB (2006). Simple and effective regeneration of mungbean (Vigna
radiata (L) Wilczek) using cotyledonary node explants. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 15(2):131-134.
Villanueva MJC, Muñiz BF, Tames RS (1985). Effects of glyphosate on growth and the
chlorophyll and carotenoid levels of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Science
33(6):751-754.
Voetberg GS, Sharp RE (1991). Growth of the maize primary root tip at low water potentials. III.
Role of increased proline deposition in osmotic adjustment. Plant Physiology 96: 1125–1130.
173
Wang ME, Zhou QX (2006). Effects of herbicide chlorimuron-ethyl on physiological mechanisms
in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 64(2):190–197.
Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A (2003). Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme
temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta; 218 1–14.
Wang WX, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A (2001). Biotechnology of plant osmotic stress
tolerance: physiological and molecular considerations. Acta Horticulturae; 560: 285–292.
Wani SH, Sofi PA, Gosal SS, Singh NB (2010). In vitro screening of rice (Oryza sativa L) callus
for drought tolerance. Communications in Biometry and Crop Science 5:108-115.
Watanabe K, Ohori Y, Sato Y, Böger P, Wakabayashi K (2001). Changes in fatty acid composition of neutral lipid in mungbean cotyledons by oxyfluorfen-induced peroxidation.
Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 69: 166-173.
Wauchope RD, Buttler TM, Hornsby AG, Augustijn Beckers PWM, Burt JP (1992). SCS/ARS/CES Pesticide properties database for environmental decisionmaking. Reviews of
environmental contamination and toxicology 123: 1-157,10-12.
Wei KC (1998). PhD thesis entitled “In vitro selection, regeneration and herbicide tolerant callus and
suspensions cell culture of rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”. Universiti Putra Malaysia.
WHO (World Health Organisation) (1994). Glyphosate. Environmental Health Criteria 159. The
International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS). WHO, Geneva.
Willekens H, Chamnongpol S, Davey M, Schraudner M, Langebartels C, Van Montagu M,
Inzé D, Van Camp W (1997). Catalase is a sink for H2O2 and is indispensable for stress defence in C3 plants. EMBO J 16: 4806-4816.
Windley E, White D, Redman L (1999). Screening broadleaf herbicides for post emergent use in
mungbean. ACIAR Food Legume Newsletter 30: 8-11.
Winicov I (1991). Characterization of salt tolerant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plants regenerated
from salt tolerant cell lines. Plant Cell Reports 10:561–564.
Winicov I (1996). Characterization of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants regenerated from salt-tolerant cell
lines. Plant Science 113:105–111.
Woodburn AT (2000). Glyphosate: production, pricing and use worldwide. Pest Managment
Science 56: 309–312.
Wrather JA, Freytag AH (1991). Selection of atrazine tolerant soybean calli and expression of that tolerance in regenerated plants. Plant Cell Reports 10, 44–7
WSSA (Weed Science Society of America) (1994). Herbicide Handbook. Ahrens WH, (Ed.), Weed
Science Society of America, Champaign, Illinois. pp 352.
WSSA (Weed Science Society of America) (1998). Herbicide resistance” and “herbicide tolerance”
defined.Weed Science 12:789.
Wu YX, Von Tiedemann A (2002). Impact of fungicides on active oxygen species and antioxidant
enzymes in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) exposed to ozone. Environmental Pollution, 116(1), 37-47.
Xiang WS, Wang XJ, Ren TR, Xu XL (2005). Expression of wheat cytochrome P450
monooxygenase in yeast and its inhibition by glyphosate. Pest Managment Science 61:402–406.
Yadav SK, Jyothi Lakshmi N, Singh V, Patil A, Tiwari YK, Nagendram E, Sathish P, Vanaja
M, Maheswari M, Venkateswarlu B (2013). In vitro screening of Vigna mungo genotypes for PEG induced moisture deficit stress. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 18,(1):55-60.
174
Yadav SK, Sreenu P, Maheswari M, Vanaja M, Venkateswarlu B (2010). Efficient shoot
regeneration from double cotyledonary node explants of green gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Indian Journal of Biotechnology, 9(4), 403-407.
Yamamoto E, Zeng L, Baird WV (1998). α-tubulin missence mutation correlate with
antimicrotubule drug resistance in Eleusine indica. Plant Cell 10:297-308.
Yamato S, Katagiri M, Ohkawa H (1994). Purification and characterization of a protoporphyrinogen-oxidizing enzyme with peroxidase activity and light-dependent
herbicide resistance in tobacco cultured-cells. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 50: 72-
82.
Yan HC, TieBao C, Yu W, BaoHong S (2000). Study on the effects of 3 herbicides on the growth
of maize seedlings. Plant Protection 26:17–19.
Yancey P, Clark M, Hand S, Bowlus R, Somero G (1982). Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. Science 217:1214-1222.
Ye GN, Hajdukiewicz PTJ, Broyles D, Rodriguez D, Xu CW, Nehra N, Staub JM (2001). Plastid-expressed 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase genes provide high level
glyphosate tolerance in tobacco. The Plant Journal, 25: 261–270.
Yenish JP, Young FL (2000). Effect of preharvest glyphosate application on seed and seedling
quality of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technology. 14(1):212-217.
Yenne SP, Thill DC, Letourneau DJ, Auld DL, Haderlie LC (1987) Techniques for selection of glyphosate-tolerant field pea, Pisum sativum, cultivars. Weed Technology 2, 286–290.
Yin XL, Jiang L, Song NH, Yang H. (2008). Toxic reactivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants to
herbicide isoproturon. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56(12):4825-4831.
Yuan CI, Chainga MY, Chen YM (2002). Triple mechanisms of glyphosate-resistance in a
naturally occurring glyphosate-resistant plant Dicliptera chinensis. Plant Science 16(3):543-
554.
Zaidi A, Khan MS, Rizvi PQ (2005). Effect of herbicides on growth, nodulation and nitrogen content of greengram. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25(4):497-504.
Zair I, Chlyah A, Sabounji K, Tittahsen M, Chlyah H (2003). Salt tolerance improvement in
some wheat cultivars after application of In vitro selection pressure. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 73: 237-244.
Žaltauskaitė J,Brazaitytė V (2011). Assessment of the effects of sulfonylureas herbicide
amidosulfuron application on target and non-target organisms. Proceedings of the 3rd
International Cemepe and Secotox Conference Skiathos, June 19-24.
Zambrano AY, Demey JR, González V (2003). In vitro selection of a glyphosate-tolerant
sugarcane cellular line. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 21: 365–373.
Zambrano AY, Demey JR, González V (1999). Selection of an Ametryn tolerant sugarcane cellular line. Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico 83: 47-54.
Zebarjadi AR, Ghasempour, HR, Soheilikhah Z (2010). Effects of drought stress on biochemical
and physiological parameters in callus cultures of Carthamus tinctorius varieties. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 58:395-406.
Zerner M, Wheeler R, McMurray L, (2014). Herbicide tolerance of cereal and pulse varieties
Sowingguide.http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/179999/Herbicide_toler
ance_of_cereal_and_pulse_varieties.pdf
Zeven AC, de Wet JMJ (1982). Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity. Centre
for Agricultural Publication and Documentation, Wageningen.
175
Zhang HX, Hodson JN, Williams JP and Blumwald E (2001). Engineering salt-tolerant Brassica
plants: Characterization of yield and seed oil quality in transgenic plants with increased vacuolar sodium accumulation. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of USA 98
(22): 12832–12836.
Zhang Y, Donnelly DJ (1997). In vitro bioassays for salinity tolerance screening of potato. Potato
Research 40 (3):285-295.
Zhou KJ, Guan CY, Xiao WN (2009). Effects of chemical ripeners on chlorophyll content and
antioxidant enzyme activities of rapeseed pod. Chinise Journal of Applied Ecology (The
journal of applied ecology) 20 (12):3015-9.
Zhou M, Xu H, Wei X, Ye Z, Wei L, Gong W, Wang Y and Zhu Z (2006). Identification of a
glyphosate-resistant mutant of rice 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase using a
directed evolution strategy. Plant Physiology 140:184-195.