Judgement Copy
-
Upload
rahul-prashanth -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
0
Transcript of Judgement Copy
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
1/36Page 1
Reportable
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4870 OF 2015
Mohamma Sa !"#$ % A&&$''a()
V$*+#+
Da*,a*a S!(-h #*# % R$+&o( $()
J U D M E N T
P*a/#''a C. Pa() J.
This appeal, preferred under Section 116A of The
Representation of the People Act, 1951, is directed against
judgment and order dated 07 0! "015, passed #$ %igh &ourt
of Punja# and %ar$ana at &handigarh, in 'P (o 1)"01",
*here#$ 'lection Petition filed #$ respondent has #een
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
2/36Page 2
Page 2 of 36
allo*ed, and election of the appellant from 10"+ hadaur
-Scheduled &aste. Assem#l$ &onstituenc$ in Punja#, has #een
set aside
" rief facts of the case are that /eneral 'lections *ere
held to Punja# egislati e Assem#l$, in 2anuar$, "01" ast
date of filing of nomination papers *as 1" 01 "01" 3ate for
scrutin$ of nomination papers *as 16 01 "01" And polling
*as held on 40 01 "01" The counting of otes *as done on
06 04 "01", in *hich appellant *as declared elected
4 'lection Petitioner -respondent herein. filed his
nomination papers as a candidate of Shiromani A ali 3al The
appellant *as a candidate from ndian (ational &ongress
There *ere other 17 candidates in the fra$ Se en independent
candidates *ithdre* their candidature, as such, onl$ 1" *ere
left in the field Since hadaur constituenc$ *as reser ed for
Scheduled &astes, onl$ the candidates #elonging to Scheduled
&astes *ere ualified to contest the election under Section 5
-a. of The Representation of the People Act, 1951 -hereinafter
8RP Act .
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
3/36Page 3
Page 3 of 36
! t appears that on 1! 01 "01", one adal Singh
complained to the Returning :fficer, hadaur &onstituenc$,
alleging that appellant ;ohammad Sadi ue *as a muslim,
and as such did not #elong to an$ Scheduled &aste %e also
filed &i il
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
4/36Page 4
Page 4 of 36
Scheduled &astes t is specificall$ pleaded that the appellant
*as #orn in a famil$ *hich follo*ed slam, and his parents
and others mem#ers of the famil$ also professed slam The$
had their names *hich are pre alent amongst muslims, and
the$ used to o#ser e traditions of slam (one of their famil$
mem#ers use 8Singh , in their names, normall$ found *ith the
names of those follo*ing >Si h? religion t is further pleaded #$
the election petitioner+respondent that in his inter ie* in the
#oo titled + 8Sada ahar /a$a @ ;ohammad Sadi ue
2ee an Te /eet , the appellant had confessed that he *as a
muslim t is also stated in the election petition that after
death of the parents of the appellant, their #odies *ere #uried
as per muslim rites t is further alleged that the &aste
certificate issued to the appellant sho*ing him to #e mem#er
of communit$ 83oom -;arasi. #$ Tehsildar, udhiana -
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
5/36Page 5
Page 5 of 36
the 3eput$ &ommissioners in State of Punja# that a person
professing slam is not legall$ entitled to get Scheduled &aste
certificate Another communication dated 16 04 "009 stated to
ha e #een issued #$ the State /o ernment informing the
3eput$ &ommissioners that such Scheduled &astes
certificates issued on or after 01 01 19=0 *ere lia#le to #e
cancelled
7 Appellant contested the election petition, and filed his
*ritten statement %e pleaded that he professed Si h religion,
and is a mem#er of 83oom communit$ *hich is a Scheduled
&aste in the State of Punja# %e admitted that he *as #orn in
a muslim famil$, #ut ne er offered pra$ers in mos ue or
o#ser ed RoBas t is further pleaded that from the childhood
appellant used to sing songs in the compan$ of Si h *riters,
artists and singers %e used to go to the /urud*aras to pa$
o#eisance and de eloped faith in Si h religion %e follo*ed the
rites, rituals and customs of Si h religion %e performed
>Sampath Path? *ith Ragis at his residence for se en da$s in
the $ear "000, and his t*o daughters are married to %indu
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
6/36Page 6
Page 6 of 36
#o$s The appellant specificall$ stated in the *ritten statement
that he em#raced Si h religion formall$ on 14 0! "006, and a
pu#lic notice to this effect *as pu#lished in ne*spapers+ >The
%industan Times?, &handigarh, and >3ail$ A ali Patri a?,
2alandhar, dated 0! 01 "007 t is eCplained in the *ritten
statement that since the appellant *as popular as a singer
*ith name+ ;ohammad Sadi ue, therefore, he did not change
his name e en after em#racing Si h religion :n death of his
*ife Smt Raffi an D Seeto *ho died on 17 1" "007 though
she *as #uried #$ follo*ers of slam, #ut appellant performed
8A hand Path from 0! 01 "00= to 06 01 "00= as per Si h
religion t is further stated that hog of A hand Path, Eirtan
and Antim Ardas *ere held in /urud*ara at udhiana *hich
*as attended #$ prominent Si h personalities The appellant
has eCplained in the *ritten statement that his mother Smt
Parsanni 3e i *ho died on 16 1" "009 *as follo*er of slam,
and after her death her #od$ *as #uried #ut the appellant
performed A hand Path and hog on "7 1" "009 in /urd*ara
Sahi# at illage Eup alan (ame of the appellant?s father *as
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
7/36Page 7
Page 7 of 36
inter ie* that he *as a muslim t is alleged that since earlier
he *as issued caste certificate as >3oom ;arasi? #$ mista e,
that is *h$ he got issued fresh certificate of caste mentioning
>3oom? t is also pleaded that the daughters of the appellant
*ere also issued Scheduled &aste certificates The appellant
accepted that he did recei e a notice ide letter dated
40 11 "006, to deposit caste certificate issued to him #$
19 1" "006 #ut denied that his certificate *as e er cancelled
or *ithdra*n #$ the /o ernment
= The %igh &ourt, on the #asis of the pleadings of the
parties framed follo*ing issues +
-1.
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
8/36Page 8
Page 8 of 36
-5.
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
9/36Page 9
Page 9 of 36
complete inclination to*ards Si hism and *as a >Ragi?
and used to perform Eirtan at Alamgir Si h /urd*ara
11 " The appellant has throughout #een raised as a Si h %e
has professed the Si h religion, and performed the
ceremonies, rituals and rites of Si hism
11 4 %e has ne er offered pra$er in a mos ue, or ept RoBas,
or offered (amaB, or had ne er #een to %aj %e has
ne er li ed nor considered himself a muslim, nor *as he
so considered #$ others
11 ! %e started singing songs at a er$ earl$ age and in due
course #ecame one of the most popular fol singers in
Punja# %e *as associated *ith other *riters, artists,
singers and producers, *ho *ere all Si hs, and used to
isit /urd*aras *ith them to pa$ o#eisance, and had full
faith in Si h religion At e er$ stage + sho* of his, the
appellant started the performance #$ singing religious
songs in praise of the /uru Sahi#ans
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
10/36Page 10
Page 10 of 36
11 5 3uring 19=9+1991, appellant?s daughters *ere all issued
caste certificates mentioning >3oom? as their caste, as per
certificates dated 01 0= 19=9, and 16 0! 1991 These
are still alid and not cancelled
11 6 3uring 1999+"000, appellant *as going through a
personal #ad phase in his life :n the ad ice of Sardar
Pargat Singh /re*al, the appellant got performed the
>Sampat Path?, *hich *as performed #$ Sant a#a Sucha
Singh along *ith other Ragis of 2a*adi Ta sal at his
residence in udhiana for se en da$s Thereafter, the
appellant?s condition started impro ing, and it further
strengthened his #elief in Si h religion
11 7 3uring "001+"00", three of the appellant?s daughters,
namel$, (aseem A htar, ShehnaB A htar and 2a ed
A htar *ere married into %indu families The marriages
*ere performed as per %indu rites and ceremonies, as
desired #$ the respecti e hus#ands? families
11 = Though the appellant had al*a$s #een raised as a Si h
and had follo*ed Si hism, he formall$ em#raced Si hism
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
11/36Page 11
Page 11 of 36
on 14 0! "006 %e ga e a pu#lic notice of this, *hich
*as pu#lished in leading ne*spapers namel$ %industan
Times, &handigarh and 3ail$ A ali Patri a, &handigarh
on 0! 01 "007 Since appellant had #ecome famous
throughout Punja# and indeed all o er ndia as a singer,
he retained his muslim name and did not change it
11 9 :n 14 07 "006, appellant got his application and
affida it t$ped #$ a t$pist in udhiana for o#taining his
caste certificate The appellant did not read the same
#efore signing and &aste certificate *as issued to the
appellant mentioning his caste as >3oom? -;arasi. The
appellant at this stage realiBed that the t$pist had #$
mista e in the application *rongl$ mentioned his caste
as >3oom?-;arasi. instead of caste >3oom?
11 10 :n "5 0= "006, appellant therefore as ed the
Tehsildar to cancel the *rong caste certificate and, on his
as ing, re+applied *ith the correct caste mentioned as
>3oom? Hresh caste certificate mentioning >3oom? as the
caste *as issued to the appellant, *hich is still alid and
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
12/36Page 12
Page 12 of 36
has not #een cancelled >3oom? is a Scheduled &aste in
Punja#
11 11 There *as no o#jection from an$one to the appellant?s
formall$ em#racing Si hism, rather, he *as *elcomed
into it Prominent Si h personalities such as Sant
Shamsher Singh 2agera, President of Sant Sepahi 3al
and nternational Sant Samaj, honoured the appellant #$
presenting 8Saropa to the appellant on "0 01 "007 %e
*as also *elcomed #$ Sant Eartar 3ass 2ee at his 3era
and Sardar Pargat Singh /re*al, President, Prof ;ohan
Singh Houndation
11 1" The appellant?s *ife Rafi an D Seeto passed a*a$ on
17 1" "007 Since she had #een follo*ing slam, she *as
#uried %o*e er, since the appellant had #een follo*ing
Si hism, he got the >A hand Path? performed in
/urd*ara Shri Tegh ahadur Satsang Sa#ha, udhiana
from 0! 01 "00= to 06 01 "00=, and the #hog of A hand
Path of Sh /uru /ranth Sahi# *as performed on
06 01 "00= at his residence and thereafter Eirtan and
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
13/36Page 13
Page 13 of 36
Antim Ardas *as held on the same da$ follo*ed #$ /uru
a angar as per Si h rituals, rites, customs and
ceremonies The o#ituar$ to this fact *as got pu#lished
in arious ne*spaper namel$ >Aj 3i A*aj, 2alandhar
dated 05 01 "00= and >Ajit 2alandhar? dated
0! 01 "00= The Eirtan and Antim Ardas of the
appellant?s *ife *as *ell pu#licised and *idel$ attended,
including #$ prominent Si h personalities The entire
e ent *as also ideographed and the original ideo
recordings *ere produced as e idence #efore the %igh
&ourt
11 14 The appellant?s mother Smt Parsanni 3e i passed a*a$
on 16 1" "009 Since she had follo*ed slam, she *as
#uried %o*e er, again, since the appellant *as
follo*ing Si hism, he got performed the A hand Path
and #hog of A hand Path of Sri /uru /ranth Sahi# and
Eirtan and Antim Ardas on "7 1" "009 in /urd*ara
Sahi# at Gillage Eup alan, Tehsil ;aler otla 3istrict
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
14/36Page 14
Page 14 of 36
Sangrur This *as also attended #$ se eral prominent
Si h personalities
11 1! n 3ecem#er "011, the election scheduled for Punja#
egislati e Assem#l$ 'lections *as announced
(omination papers *ere to #e filed on or #efore
1" 01 "01" Scrutin$ of papers *as on 14 01 "01" The
appellant filed his nomination papers from ndian
(ational &ongress Part$ for hadaur &onstituenc$ The
respondent -'lection Petitioner. filed his nomination from
the Shiromani A ali 3al Part$ hadaur constituenc$
*as reser ed for Scheduled &astes in Punja#
3emographicall$, it is dominated #$ Si hs *ho are the
majorit$ religious group in this constituenc$ Polling *as
held on 40 01 "01" :n 06 04 "01", results *ere
declared and the appellant emerged as the successful
candidate, *inning #$ a *ide margin
11 15 Hor the a oidance of dou#t, on 11 0= "01!, appellant
made a declaration as per Section "-9. of the Si h
/urd*aras Act 19"5 to the effect that he *as a follo*er
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
15/36Page 15
Page 15 of 36
of Si h religion %o*e er, on 07 0! "015, the impugned
order *as pronounced #$ the %igh &ourt, *hich allo*ed
the petition, holding that the appellant *as not eligi#le to
contest the election from hadaur The %igh &ourt held
that since the appellant?s parents follo*ed slam, he *as
a muslim and therefore could not #e a mem#er of a
Scheduled &aste t further held that appellant had not
em#raced Si hism and e en if he em#raced Si hism, he
*ould not get the #enefit of #eing a mem#er of a
Scheduled &aste
11 16 The impugned order is erroneous #ecause it ignored the
o er*helming e idence that the appellant had li ed his
life throughout as a Si h Hinding of %igh &ourt that the
appellant is a muslim is incorrect, and the e idence has
not #een correctl$ appreciated There is no formal
ceremon$ or procedure re uired to em#race Si hism
The fact that a person has led his life throughout #$
follo*ing Si h customs, rituals, rites and ceremonies,
and that he has not follo*ed the ceremonies, of an$ other
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
16/36Page 16
Page 16 of 36
religion, leads to the conclusion that the person is a
Si h
11 17 Appellant had led his life throughout #$ follo*ing Si h
customs %e used to pra$ in /urd*aras %e got the
A hand Path, #hog, irtan and Antim Ardas performed
after the death of his *ife and his mother Three of his
daughters are married into %indu families %e had gi en
a pu#lic notice of his formall$ em#rasing Si hism as far
#ac as in "006, *hich *as not o#jected to #$ an$one
:n the other hand, the e idence *as clear that he had
ne er o#ser ed an$ of the customs, rites, or ceremonies
of slam Thus, neither did appellant conduct himself as
a muslim, nor did he regard himself as the one %e *as
not percei ed as a muslim #$ his near and dear ones,
friends and ac uaintances
11 1= The %igh &ourt erred in holding that the declaration
made #$ the appellant under the Si h /urd*aras Act
19"5 *ould ta e effect onl$ from the date of the
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
17/36Page 17
Page 17 of 36
declaration t failed to note that the declaration, #$ its
er$ nature, *ould #e retroacti e in operation
11 19 The %igh &ourt erred in holding that the instant case
*as one of con ersion from slam to Si hism and
therefore the appellant could not claim to #e a mem#er of
a Scheduled &aste The %igh &ourt failed to appreciate
that the appellant had #een raised as a Si h #elonging to
>3oom? caste from the er$ #eginning and such it *as not
a case of con ersion
11 "0 The %igh &ourt has misconstrued the e idence of P
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
18/36Page 18
Page 18 of 36
11 "1 The %igh &ourt further erred in holding that since the
appellant did not *ear the fi e > a as? i e Eachha,
Earha, Eirpan, Eangha and Eesh, he could not #e a Si h
The %igh &ourt failed to note that the same is re uired
onl$ of Amritdhari Si hs, and not all Si hs, and e en
among Amritdhari Si hs it is not a uni ersal practice
1" Su#missions and arguments ad anced on #ehalf of
Respondent -'lection Petitioner. +
1" 1 &onstitution -Scheduled &astes. :rder, 1950 pro ides
that no person *ho professes a religion different from the
%indu, the Si h or the uddhist shall #e deemed to #e a
mem#er of a Scheduled &aste Thus a person professing
;uslim religion cannot claim Scheduled &aste status
1" " Inder section 5-a. of the Representation of the People Act
1951, the ualification to #e elected to the egislati e
Assem#l$ from a seat reser ed for Scheduled &astes is
that the candidate must #elong to one of the Scheduled
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
19/36Page 19
Page 19 of 36
&astes specified for the said State, in the &onstitution
-Scheduled &astes. :rder, 1950 Since the hadaur
&onstituenc$ *as reser ed for the Scheduled &astes in
the State of Punja#, as such the appellant #eing not a
mem#er of Scheduled &aste *as not ualified to contest
election from said &onstituenc$
1" 4 The %igh &ourt has correctl$ e aluated the material
a aila#le on record to find out as to *hether the
appellant had ta en #irth in the famil$ of Scheduled
&aste as per the &onstitution -Scheduled &astes. :rder,
1950 #efore concluding that the appellant #eing a
muslim cannot deri e an$ #enefit of Scheduled &aste
1" ! ' en if it is presumed that the appellant #elonged to
3oom communit$ and em#raced Si hism, it cannot #e
said that he *as a mem#er of Scheduled &aste and he
*ould carr$ his >3oom? &aste along *ith him at the time
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
20/36Page 20
Page 20 of 36
of con ersion t is apposite to mention here that a
muslim e en if #elonging to Scheduled &aste *as not
eligi#le to contest the election, as such #$ merel$
em#racing Si hism, he cannot #ecome eligi#le for the
same
1" 5 A person em#racing religion other than %indu or Si h
does not carr$ his caste *ith him as a general rule (o
special circumstances ha e #een #rought on record so
that this &ourt ma$ presume that the appellant had
carried his >3oom? caste along *ith him after em#racing
Si hism n fact, on the #asis of the e idence led #$ #oth
the parties, the %igh &ourt *as rightl$ not con inced
that the appellant had em#raced Si hism for the reason
that the appellant fairl$ admitted during his cross+
eCamination that his forefathers as *ell as his *ife *ere
follo*ing slam
1" 6 ;oreo er, the declaration *hich is re uired to #e erified
#$ a ;agistrate under Rule 4-#. of the Si h /urd*aras
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
21/36Page 21
Page 21 of 36
Rules, 19"5 has #een erified #$ the :ath &ommissioner
and not #$ the ;agistrate, and hence it does not ualif$
to #e a legal declaration and therefore, its not a alid
declaration
1" 7 $ an application dated 14 07 "006, -'Ch PH., the
appellant had applied for issuance of a Scheduled &aste
certificate #$ claiming himself that he #elonged to 83oom
-;arasi. caste, *hich *as granted to him on the same
date i e 14 07 06 -'Ch PH6., under the orders of the then
Tehsildar, udhiana -
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
22/36Page 22
Page 22 of 36
"5 0= "006 -'Ch P/., for issuance of another Scheduled
&aste certificate claiming himself to #e a 83oom caste
onl$ and a certificate -'Ch P/"., to that effect *as issued
on the same date i e "5 0= "006 %o*e er, the 2oint
Secretar$,
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
23/36Page 23
Page 23 of 36
1" 9 The t*o Scheduled &aste &ertificates dated 14 07 "006
'Ch PH6 and "5 0= "006 'Ch P/" got issued #$ the
appellant are not alid Scheduled &aste certificates
1" 10 Su# Section -9. of Section ", of the Si h /urud*ara Act,
19"5 defines a Si h reads as follo*s+
8-9. Si h @ 8Si h means a person *ho professes theSi h religion or in the case of a deceased person,*ho professed the Si h religion or *as no*n to #ea Si h during his life time
f an$ uestion arises as to *hether an$ li ingperson is or is not a Si h, he shall #e deemedrespecti el$ to #e or not to #e a Si h according as
he ma es or refuses to ma e in such manner as theState /o t ma$ prescri#e the follo*ing declaration+
solemnl$ affirm that am a Si h, that #elie e inthe /uru /ranth Sahi#, that #elie e in the ten/urus and that ha e no other religion
1" 11 n the Rules framed under Si h /urud*ara Act, 19"5,
it is pro ided that a declaration shall #e made either
orall$ in the presence of the authorit$ #$ *hom it is to #e
decided *hether the person in uestion is a Si h or not,
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
24/36Page 24
Page 24 of 36
or in *riting and -i. if the declaration is made orall$ the
authorit$ in *hose presence it is made shall record the
ma ing of it in *riting and the record shall #e attested #$
the signature or thum#+mar of the person ma ing it,
and -ii. if the declaration is made in *riting it shall #e
signed #$ the person ma ing it, shall #e erified #$ a
magistrate and shall #e for*arded in original to the
authorit$ #$ *hom it is to #e decided *hether the person
in uestion is a Si h or not
1" 1" Hor ceremon$ of aptism and mitation procedure
re uired in Art JJ G is re uired to #e follo*ed, *hich is
not follo*ed, as such %igh &ourt committed no error of
la* in setting aside election of the appellant
1" 14 n the a#o e circumstances, the respondent deser es to
#e declared elected for remaining period from Assem#l$
&onstituenc$ hadaur
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
25/36Page 25
Page 25 of 36
14
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
26/36Page 26
Page 26 of 36
an$ of the four social di isions namel$ rahmin -Priests.,
Ehshatri$a -scheduled castes? hasa technical meaning gi en to it #$ clause -"!. ofArticle 466 and it means +
>such castes, races or tri#es or parts of orgroups *ithin such castes, races or tri#es asare deemed under Article 4!1 to #e Scheduled&astes for the purposes of this &onstitution?
The President in eCercise of the po*er conferredupon him under Article 4!1 has issued the&onstitution -Scheduled &astes. :rder, 1950 Paras-". and -4. of this :rder are material and the$ readas follo*s
8" Su#ject to the pro isions of this :rder,the castes, races or tri#es or parts of or groups*ithin caste or tri#es specified in Part to Jof the Schedule to this :rder shall, in relationto the States to *hich these parts respecti el$relate, #e deemed to #e scheduled castes so far
1 (1976) 3 SCC 411
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
27/36Page 27
Page 27 of 36
as regards mem#ers thereof resident in thelocalities specified in relation to them in thoseParts of that Schedule
4 (ot*ithstanding an$thing contained inpara ", no person *ho professes a religiondifferent from the %indu or the Si h religionshall #e deemed to #e a mem#er of aScheduled &aste
The schedule to this order in Part sets out thecastes, races or tri#es or parts of or groups *ithincastes or tri#es *hich shall in the different areas ofthe State of Andhra Pradesh #e deemed to #e
scheduled castes :ne of the castes specified thereis ;adiga caste and that caste must, therefore, #edeemed to #e a scheduled caste ut #$ reason ofclause -4., a person #elonging to ;adiga caste*ould not #e deemed to #e a mem#er of a scheduledcaste unless he professes %indu or Si h religion atthe rele ant time t is not necessar$ that he shouldha e #een #orn a %indu or a Si hKK
-'mphasis supplied.
17 n S. Anbalagan . B. Devarajan 2 , *hich is a case
pertaining to election from Rasipuram Parliamentar$
&onstituenc$ -reser ed for Scheduled &astes., a three+2udge
ench of this &ourt at the end of para 14 has o#ser ed as
under +
814 KKKK (o*, if such a &hristian #ecomes a%indu, surel$ he *ill re ert to his original caste, if
2 (1984) 2 SCC 112
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
28/36Page 28
Page 28 of 36
he had lost it at all n fact this process goes oncontinuousl$ in ndia and generation #$ generationlost sheep appear to return to the caste+fold and areonce again assimilated in that fold This appears to
#e particularl$ so in the case of mem#ers of theScheduled &astes, *ho em#race other religions intheir uest for li#eration, #ut return to their oldreligion on finding that their disa#ilities ha e clungto them *ith great tenacit$
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
29/36Page 29
Page 29 of 36
in ol es loss of the caste unless the religion to*hich he is con erted is li#eral enough to permitthe con ertee to retain his caste or the famil$ la*s#$ *hich he *as originall$ go erned There are
num#er of cases *here mem#ers #elonging to aparticular caste ha ing #een con erted to&hristianit$ or e en to slam retain their caste orfamil$ la*s and despite the ne* order the$ *erepermitted to #e go erned #$ their old la*s ut thiscan happen onl$ if the ne* religion is li#eral andtolerant enough to permit such a course of action
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
30/36Page 30
Page 30 of 36
other religions Appl$ing the doctrine of eclipse, this &ourt
o#ser ed as under +
8 4. n our opinion, *hen a person is con erted to&hristianit$ or some other religion the original casteremains under eclipse and as soon as duringhis)her lifetime the person is recon erted to theoriginal religion the eclipse disappears and the casteautomaticall$ re i es
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
31/36Page 31
Page 31 of 36
"0 n paragraphs 51 and 5" in Kailash Sonkar -supra., on
the facts of said case, this &ourt ga e follo*ing conclusions +
851 KKKKK
-1 . That the respondent *as #orn of &hristianparents and *as educated in arious schoolsor institutions *here she *as no*n as a&hristian,
-2 . That 4+! $ears #efore the election, therespondent *as recon erted to %induism and
married 2ai Pra ash Shal*ar, a mem#er of theEatia caste, and also performed theShudhi aran ceremon$,
-3 . That she *as not onl$ accepted #ut also*elcomed #$ the important mem#ers,including the President and Gice+President, ofthe communit$,
-4 . There is no e idence to sho* that there *as
an$ #ar under the &hristian religion *hichcould ha e pre ented her from recon ertingherself to %induism,
-5 . That there *as no e idence to sho* that e enher parents had #een &hristian fromgeneration to generation
52. n these circumstances, therefore, this case
fulfils the conditions re uired for #eing recon ertedto %induism from &hristianit$ in order to re i e theoriginal caste
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
32/36Page 32
Page 32 of 36
"1 n K. . Manu . Scrunity Co!!ittee "or #eri"ication
o" Co!!unity Certi"icate 4 , one of the uestions eCamined #$
this &ourt is @ *hether on re+con ersion, a person #orn to
&hristian parents could, after recon ersion to the %indu
religion, #e eligi#le to claim the #enefit of his original caste
Referring to arious case la*s, including those referred a#o e,
this &ourt disagreed *ith the finding of Scrutin$ &ommittee
that caste certificate issued to a person on the #asis of the fact
that though the great grandfathers of such person #elonged to
Pula$a communit$ -i e Scheduled &aste., #ut he *as #orn
after his ancestors em#raced &hristianit$ and thereafter,
recon erted into %indu religion is not entitled to the
Scheduled &aste certificate &onstitution ench decision in
Guntur Medical College -supra. and three+2udge ench
decisions in S. Anbalagan -supra. and Kailash Sonkar
-supra. are referred to and relied upon in K. . Manu -supra.
"" n the case at hand, admittedl$ the appellant *as #orn to
muslim parents %o*e er, he has pro ed that his famil$
mem#ers though follo*ed slam #ut the$ #elonged to 83oom4 (2015) 4 SCC 1
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
33/36Page 33
Page 33 of 36
communit$ t is settled la* that a person can change his
religion and faith #ut not the caste, to *hich he #elongs, as
caste has lin age to #irth t is pro ed on the record that the
appellant *as issued a caste certificate as he *as found to #e
mem#er of >3oom? communit$ #$ the competent authorit$,
after he declared that he has em#raced Si hism, and he *as
accepted #$ the Si h communit$ t is not disputed that
>3oom? in Punja# is a Scheduled &aste under &onstitution
-Scheduled &astes. :rder, 1950 The Scheduled &aste
&ertificate (o 61!9 dated "5 0= "006 -'Ch P/)". *as issued
to the appellant #$ the competent authorit$, and accepted #$
the returning officer Said certificate appears to ha e not #een
cancelled
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
34/36Page 34
Page 34 of 36
record that the appellant em#raced Si h religion on
14 0! "006, and got pu#lished the declaration on 0! 01 "007
in the ne*spapers %industan Times -'nglish. 'Ch RA, and Ajit
-Punja#i. 'Ch R (omination for election in uestion *as
filed #$ him fi e $ears thereafter The appellant has further
sufficientl$ eCplained that since he *as popular as a singer
*ith the name @ >;ohammad Sadi ue? as such *ithout
changing his name, he accepted the Si hism and follo*ed all
rites and traditions of Si h Religion
"4 t is not essential for an$one to change one?s name after
em#racing a different faith %o*e er, such change in name
can #e a corro#orating fact regarding con ersion or
recon ersion into a religion)faith in appropriate cases Also it
is not necessar$ in la* that entire famil$ of a person should
con ert or recon ert to the religion to *hich he has gone
R
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
35/36Page 35
Page 35 of 36
his cross+eCamination admits that he did not raise an$
o#jection at the time *hen nomination papers *ere filed #$ the
appellant
"! n the a#o e circumstances, *e are inclined to hold that
the %igh &ourt has erred in la*, #$ ignoring the a#o e facts on
the record, and gi ing importance to form of declaration, and
the inter ie* said to ha e #een gi en #$ appellant to P< 6
/ulBar Singh Shaun i, author of #oo + 8Sada ahar /a$a @
;ohammad Sadi ue 2ee an Te /eet -'Ch PE. Statement of
the appellant R
-
8/17/2019 Judgement Copy
36/36
Page 36 of 36
Devarajan " , and Kailash Sonkar . Maya Devi 4 , in our
opinion, the impugned judgment passed #$ the %igh &ourt
cannot #e upheld
"6 Accordingl$, the appeal is allo*ed, and the 'lection
Petition filed #$ the respondent is dismissed (o order as to
costs
KKKKKKKKKKK 2 MRanjan /ogoiN
KKKKKKKKKKK 2
MPrafulla & PantN
(e* 3elhiO
April "9, "016
2 (1984) 2 SCC 112