JMN ZEEinBrazil
-
Upload
blanca-rengifo -
Category
Documents
-
view
243 -
download
0
Transcript of JMN ZEEinBrazil
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 1/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to
date and relevance as a strategic land-use planning tool1
Summary
This paper examines the strategic land use planning tool, Ecological-Economic Zoning(EEZ), developed in Brazil in the 1980s and applied extensively in the Amazon regionto date. It introduces EEZ origins and evolution; definitions and implementationmethodologies; and briefly reviews critiques to date and its application in the Amazonregion. A framework is then established for analyzing this tool, covering theoretical,policy and practical issues and is applied to five key groups of aspects: economic,socio-political, environmental, spatial and operational. This leads to recommendationsas to how the key issues identified can be the basis for learning from internationalexperience; for future application of EEZ; and/or alternative and appropriate
mechanisms for urban and rural areas in Brazil.
KeywordsLand use planning; regional planning; zoning; Latin America; Brazil
1 This paper has been prepared under the aegis of the Research Project entitled“Methodological Discussion and Application of Ecological and Economic Zoning (EEZ) toUrban Areas”, which is jointly financed by the British Council andNEPAMA/PRONEX/FINEP/MCT in Brazil. The research team is composed of researchersfrom the following institutions: the Centre for Regional and Urban Studies (NEUR) and
Centre for Research on Agricultural and Environmental Economics (NEPAMA) in theUniversity of Brasilia; and the Centre for Environment and Human Settlements (CEHS) in the Edinburgh College of Art/Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 2/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
Contents
1. Introduction.............................................................................................................. 22. Background.............................................................................................................. 33. Analysis of EEZ........................................................................................................8
3.1 Framework for Analysis ..................................................................................... 83.1.1 Critiques to date..........................................................................................83.1.2 Application of EEZ to date......................................................................... 103.1.3 Analytical framework.................................................................................13
3.2 Application of analysis .....................................................................................153.2.1 Economic Aspects.....................................................................................153.2.2 Environmental Aspects ............................................................................. 173.2.3 Socio-political aspects...............................................................................193.2.4 Spatial aspects..........................................................................................203.2.5 Operational aspects .................................................................................. 22
4 Conclusions on the future of EEZ .......................................................................... 234.1 Key issues.................................................................................................... 23
4.2 Specific recommendations ........................................................................... 264.3 On-going investigation..................................................................................31
5. References............................................................................................................. 31
Total word count body of text – approx 7896 words to date(World Development does not specify maximum word length but maximum pagelength: 30 to 35 double-spaced pages including everything – summary, main text,bibliography, notes. Using double spacing and font 11 for the main text only we arealready at 33 pages.)
1. Introduction
Strategic land use planning is applied in many different ways across the world, with
varying degrees of involvement of the main actors in land development – government
and private sectors as well as actors within civil society. Strategic land use planning
(“territorial ordering” 2) has been a government priority in Brazil for some time and has
been manifested since the 1980s through a government-led mechanism entitled
“Ecological-economic zoning” (EEZ). EEZ has been used as one of the instruments of
national environmental policy and has been applied mainly, though not exclusively, in
the Legal Amazon region.
2 In this paper the term ‘strategic land use planning’, more familiar to an English-speakingreadership, is used to refer to what in Brazilian planning is known as “ordenamentoterritorial” or ”territorial ordering”.
20/06/082
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 3/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
EEZ sets out systematically and holistically to analyze the dynamics and inter-relations
of biophysical and socio-economic phenomena. In so doing, ecological-economic
zoning should guide the occupation of land, reduce negative externalities of production
growth, protect biological diversity and, consequently, lead to a sustainable pattern of
development. The basic assumption underlying the use of EEZ in the Brazilian Legal
Amazon, for instance, was that the occupation and development of the region was
occurring in a chaotic way, leading to high environmental and social degradation.
According to this view, this state of things was due to erroneous government planning
and policies, and to ignorance of the potential and vulnerability of natural resources in
the region. In this context, it was proposed that through a comprehensive inventory of
natural resources and social and economic data, better planning and policies could be
devised. EEZ would thus be a basic tool towards a more sustainable occupation of
land.
This paper examines EEZ as a strategic land use planning tool. It introduces its origins
and evolution, definitions and implementation methodologies (Section 2), and briefly
reviews critiques to date and the application of EEZ in the Brazilian Legal Amazon
region (Section 3), as an example. In the same section, a framework is then
established to analyze the mechanism, covering theoretical, policy and practical issues.
This is applied to five key groups of aspects: economic, environmental, socio-political,
spatial and operational. This analysis leads to the identification of key issues and the
formulation of recommendations in Section 4.
2. Background
Various types of zoning have been applied in strategic land use planning in Brazil for
many decades. However, environmental zoning only appeared during the 1970s,
seeking the protection of the environment against perceived negative impacts of
economic growth. The Second National Development Plan (II PND, 1975-79)
20/06/083
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 4/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
reinforced the need for “rational zoning” to define rural and urban land use under an
environmental policy. In the beginning of the 1980s, the National Environment Policy
included “environmental zoning” as one of its instruments. Also from this period is one
of the first references to “ecological-economic zoning” (EEZ) for a new forestry policy
for the Brazilian Amazon. Henceforth EEZ would develop primarily as a regional
planning tool.
A first official conception of EEZ was proposed by the Brazilian Census Bureau
(IBGE)3. In order to address the impacts that the diffusion of economic activities into
undeveloped areas would have, an Environmental Commission was created, under the
coordination of the Secretariat of Planning of the Presidency (SEPLAN/PR). The
commission was created to allow collaboration between various public institutions and
it adopted EEZ as its basic policy instrument. EEZ experiments were set up to identify
zones in two priority areas: the Amazon and the Southeast (IBGE, 1986). In its initial
conception, EEZ was a model of decision-making centered in government,
predominantly at the federal level, and it was to propose and establish spatial divisions
and classifications based on ecological and socio-economic factors.
The Brazilian government developed a National Policy of Regional Development
(PNDR) in 1990, aiming to reduce differences among its regions and to consolidate a
socially balanced and self-sustaining economic development process through four
levels of planning: federal, regional, state and sub-regional (SDR/PR, 1990). Its
operational strategy relied on a Permanent Macro Program (focused on providing
economic and social equity among people from different regions) and a Strategic
Program (ensuring that the “interior” would increase its share in the national and
3 In 1986, IBGE produced a paper that is considered to be a landmark in the development of EEZ in the federal government. For a critical analysis of the objectives, justifications,criteria and methodology of IBGE’s proposal, see Leite (1991).
20/06/084
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 5/33
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 6/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
instrument to rationalize the occupation of land and to endow the government with a
technical basis to incorporate spatial considerations into public policies. EEZ was to be
used as a dynamic and continuous process in agreement with national, regional and
local priorities. It was to be based on integrated decentralized action of the Federal
Government with effective participation of states and municipalities in planning and
implementation processes.
In 1994, the Ministry of the Environment (MMA) also became involved with EEZ. This
meant a change in the direction of EEZ, given that the MMA was chosen as the main
Brazilian partner to drive the Pilot Program for Protection of the Tropical Forests of
Brazil (PP-G7).6 The PP-G7 intended to implement a structured partnership so as "to
facilitate the formulation and implementation of healthy environmental policies by the
public sector institutions, in cooperation with the private sector and with society in
general" (Banco Mundial, s/d, p. 4). Under this new approach, EEZ was to be an
instrument of environmental management, with which state public investment and
policies had to be compatible in order to access PP-G7 funds.
In this manifestation of EEZ a methodology developed by Becker & Egler (1997) was to
be followed. These authors proposed that, by studying nature and society in a given
territorial unit, the vocation of the land for agriculture or forestry, for conservation or any
other use, could be detected anddetermined
(Nitsch, 1998). Naturalvulnerability
and
socio-economic potentiality were to be defined and mapped so that their super-
imposition resulted in a matrix of sustainability or contributions to territorial
management.7 Furthermore, Becker and Egler emphasized that EEZ would provide
the states of Mato Grosso, Rondônia and Acre.6 This program is funded by the G7 countries and its finance is managed by the World Bank.
7 High vulnerability and low potential indicate conservation. High vulnerability and highpotential characterize a critical area, destined for recuperation. Low vulnerability and lowpotential indicate consolidation. Low vulnerability and high potential characterize an area
20/06/086
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 7/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
land use regulation based upon three principles: effectiveness, “valorization of
differences” (i.e. comparative advantage) and decentralization. It was assumed that
EEZ was an instrument of land use management and, at the same time, a technical
and political tool. EEZ was not to be a product in itself, but a dynamic process in which
physical division of the territory into homogeneous, static zones was one part of the
wider process of planning.
Advocates of EEZ [refs???] highlight aspects that make it a different planning tool
from previous regional planning instruments. Firstly, the emphasis on decentralized
land use management:8 the geographical area of some Brazilian states, the territorial
dispersion of economic activities and the weakness and lack of integration of public
institutions make welcome any instrument that promises to manage land use in a
decentralized fashion. Secondly, the constructive partnership among all stakeholders:
social movements, NGOs and private enterprises have exerted political pressure to
play a more important and increasing role in policy making in Brazil; in this context, the
emphasis in planning was seen to be on the principle of power sharing instead of
centralized administration. And third, the interaction of two dynamic processes, the
natural and the social processes: this interaction is considered as the essence of the
fundamental difficulties behind the selection of a sustainable pattern of development.
[refs throughout paragraph???]
forexpansion.8 Becker and Egler use the term “decentralized territorial management”; in this paper theterm “decentralized land use management” is used instead. See also footnote 2.
20/06/087
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 8/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
3. Analysis of EEZ
3.1 Framework for Analysis
3.1.1 Critiques to date
EEZ has been the subject of a number of critiques to date. Ab'Saber (1989) has argued
that EEZ was initially developed for new settlement in areas with extremely low levels
of human occupation and hence the "anthropic" element is subsidiary, limiting its
application in areas where human settlement is more pronounced. Schubart (1994)
argues that the nature of zoning is regulatory but that its relationship with public policy
formulation in Brazil is weak and that this is not resolved as yet.9 Nitsch (1994) on the
other hand considers that there is a fundamental problem with "zoning" per se,
indicating that this is an essentially negative instrument.10 In addition, Nitsch criticizes
the implicit concepts of “holism”, ecological “vocation”, and “harmony” between man
and nature. Nitsch thus fundamentally questions the nature of the assumption of
common values and the inherent "ecological determinism" which he perceives as
implicit in the EEZ methodology, and which he claims can be "hi-jacked" by eco-
technocratic blocks involving the national government, international agencies, planners
and NGOs, as a means to undermine existing democratic processes. He proposes that
"traditional regional planning”11 is a more positive instrument that relates better to the
actual interest groups at a state and local level, and hence is more democratic.
9 Schubart expresses concern with the problems of linking "technical" processes with "policy"processes. In fact most of the policy instruments he mentions have had negativerepercussions in Amazonia to date, according to Mahar (1989). Over and above this thereare serious problems of reconciling different sectoral public policies in Brazil (Millikan,1998).
10 Nitsch does not make a distinction between mandatory zoning and indicative zoning,however.
11 Nitsch understands traditional regional planning as being that with concrete infrastructure
projects as well as zoning. These projects are “traditionally” phased territorial occupationas zones of land use within the reach of the projected infrastructure (Nitsch, 1994, pp. 502-504).
20/06/088
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 9/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
Steinberger (1997a, 1997b, 1997c), on the other hand, has focused on the need to
clarify what EEZ actually is with reference to its role in developing regional equity or
celebrating regional "difference"; its role in integration of urban and regional issues;
problems inherent in the concepts of "zones" and "scale"; and problems encountered in
realizing the potential role of EEZ with reference to local authorities12. She stresses
the potential role of EEZ as a dynamic decision-making mechanism for policy
formulation with relevance for urban and regional scales/zones, although noting that a
more appropriate methodology for urban application has not been developed as yet.13
Steinberger also focuses on some of the structural and logistical problems of
implementation of EEZ (e.g. lack of organization and "conscientization" or awareness
in civil society of relevant issues; weak institutional capacity at state and municipal
levels; and problems of representativeness of NGOs).14
Based on the literature to date, additional queries about EEZ that can be raised include
that, in Becker & Egler's (1997) methodology, the essential decisions have been taken
in a purely technocratic exercise through which the zones have been labeled. All that is
left is the finer detail of the policies to be attached to the zones whose “vocation” is
already essentially technically decided. The definition of zones is thus still very "top-
down", with the recognition of wider participation coming late in the process - i.e. after a
series of factors have been surveyed - and hence the definition of interests is not
permitted in the essential criteria. As defined in this methodology, and despite its
attempts to widen participation, EEZ is essentially a supply-led mechanism, focused on
predominantly federal government interests, which may include major national and/or
12 Particularly in the context of the PPG-7 project development in Amazonia.13 In this context Steinberger argues that EEZ needs to incorporate urban sustainability
issues and thus urban land use factors.14 Nitsch however considers these to be secondary to the conceptual issues of the essentiallynegative nature of zoning.
20/06/089
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 10/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
international business and other interests, with some attempt to involve state
governments.
There is thus no real attempt to build on, or stimulate, any clear demand from potential
stakeholders for a strategic land use process that balances ecological, economic and
social uses - despite the rhetoric about municipalities and local private sector/civil
society interests (these latter being generally assumed to be represented mainly by
NGOs). This is patent in the initial review of participation in Steinberger (1997c).
However, possible refinements to the participatory process would seem to be
conceived in terms of defining existing interest groups, and thus assume underlying
common interests. This does not recognize that (a) the objectives of EEZ themselves
may be understood in radically different ways, or that (b) these understandings may be
essentially non-reconcilable. EEZ is currently not structured to either act as a tool to
build consensus where possible or allow negotiation around conflict where consensus
is not possible.
3.1.2 Application of EEZ to date
Despite its legislative position and definition as a key strategic land use planning tool,
actual application of EEZ in Brazil has been relatively limited to date. The main focus
for activity has been in the Legal Amazon,15 where EEZ is sponsored as part of the
PP-G7 Natural Resources Policy Project. All nine states within Legal Amazon have
committed themselves to develop EEZ programs, but these are at very different stages,
and in fact are being developed in significantly different ways, with various states
opting to follow approaches which differ from the proposed methodology proposed by
Becker & Egler (1997). Nevertheless, the basic thrust of the processes under way
remain similar: “macro-zoning”, definition of priority areas, survey of bio-physical and
15 Nogueira et al (2000) briefly lists 8 other areas in Brazil where EEZ is, or has been,applied, as well as various countries bordering on Brazil where EEZ is being developed.
20/06/0810
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 11/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
social data and definition of zones, prior to socio-political discussion. A detailed
description of the status of the process in the nine states is given in Nogueira et al
(2000), but is briefly summarized here.
Acre – The latest state to begin the EEZ process (April 1999), Acre has adopted a
participatory approach from the onset, with the first step being “political articulation”
before any “diagnosis”. The process also prioritizes socio-economic issues and the
institutional means for negotiation to solve socio-environmental conflicts. By the end of
1999, areas for 4 key economic-ecological activities had been identified (wood
extraction, extraction reserves, small-scale agriculture, and conservation and
preservation) as the basis for negotiation with stakeholders.
Amapá – Has concluded the first (macro) zoning phase and the technical detailed
zoning of one priority area, and is now beginning the socio-political discussion of this
detailed zoning.
Amazonas – Is only beginning the process, and is trying to involve the local population
in a similar way to Acre.
Maranhão – A “geo-environmental and socio-economic zoning” experience began in
1991, with results published in 1997. An EEZ using the Becker & Egler (1997)
methodology is still to be started, although initial preparation of logistical capacity is
underway.
Mato Grosso – An early experience with agro-ecological zoning was developed in this
state from the late 1980s, but was considered too complex for use in planning and
management. It was then decided to simplify the approach with an EEZ similar in
substance to that used in Rondônia (see below). The subsequent legislation of an
"ecological-economic-social" zoning (at 1:1,500,000 scale) was to be followed by a pilot
detailed zoning, which was contracted to an engineering firm. The results are not yet
Very little empirical data is available as yet on these experiences, however.
20/06/0811
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 12/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
available, although state personnel have complained that they are not informed of the
process being applied.
Pará – One of the most advanced in the process, piloted in a limited number of
municipalities. Following the Becker & Egler (1997) methodology, the technical part is
complete in some of these and the socio-political process is underway, albeit with
some difficulties as key stakeholders – such as powerful loggers and ranchers -
perceive this as being against their interests.
Rondônia – Also far advanced, as agro-ecological zoning was developed in this state
from the mid 1980s. The situation is also the best documented to date (Mahar &
Ducrot, 1998; Millikan, 1998). EEZ was piloted here through a separate World Bank
financed project (PLANAFLORA), effectively from 1996. However, these zoning
experiments have been characterized by institutional conflicts and low involvement of
local stakeholders. In addition, the passing of the first “approximation” zoning (scale
1:500,000) as a state law in 1988 led to considerable subsequent incompatibility with
public policies (within the state and between state and federal agencies) and with
activities on the ground, and led to the law being de facto ignored. Currently the
institutions responsible for zoning are attempting to increase stakeholder participation,
and a more detailed second approximation has been recently finalized. However, as
Mahar & Ducrot (1998) indicate, some of the strongest support for zoning is coming
from external stakeholders at national and international level.
Roraima – An EEZ for a 20,000 km² area on the border with Venezuela is in the final
stages, but no more information is as yet available.
Tocantins – This state is in fact undertaking a traditional agro-ecological zoning
process, top-down and technical in nature. This to some extent reflects the less
pressing environmental concerns in the region. Stakeholder participation is only
planned after the technical zoning is complete.
20/06/0812
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 13/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
3.1.3 Analytical framework
The analysis of EEZ as a strategic land use planning instrument can be structured in
an analytical framework (Figure 1):
OBJECTIVES:
• "philosophy"
• general intentions
CONCEPTUAL BASIS:
• explicit ?
• implicit
METHODOLOGY:
• technical
• policy
CONSTRAINTS:
• structural
• logistical
OPERATION:
• implementation
• evaluation
THEORETICAL
ISSUES
PRACTICAL
ISSUES
POLICY
ISSUES
Figure 1. Framework for analysis of EEZ
The objectives of EEZ, as defined earlier, have implicit “philosophical” positions,
represented in the general intentions – e.g. that ecological “vocation” can exist and be
technically determined; that rational analysis is the necessary basis for resource
allocation; that consensus can be found between different interest groups, etc. In
general, the conceptual basis for EEZ has not been made explicit, thus raising a series
of theoretical issues, such as those discussed by Nitsch (1998).
The methodology for operationalization of EEZ focuses on the relationship between the
technical instrument and policy-making, which has raised another set of policy issues,
such as those of Schubart (1994), focusing on the nature of public policy and ultimately
20/06/0813
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 14/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
political economics. However, the operationalization of the instrument in practice
(implementation and evaluation) has encountered a number of constraints that are both
structural (e.g. the weakness of civil society) and logistical (e.g. the technical capacity
of implementing institutions) – such as those raised by Steinberger (1997a, 1997b,
1997c) – and which pose a number of practical issues.
A full analysis of EEZ and its relevance to strategic land use planning needs to
incorporate these various levels of analysis and distinguish between them in any
recommendation. This is the basis for the next section of this paper. Given the size
limitations of a paper of this nature, we have grouped the aspects of EEZ analyzed
under this framework into five main categories, and in each of these theoretical, policy
and practical aspects are considered jointly:
• Economic aspects, including issues such as effectiveness, integration of
ecological and economic principles, efficiency and equity;
• Environmental aspects, including issues such as the assumption of shared
values, ecological determinism and principles of sustainable development;
• Socio-political aspects, including the basis of decision-making, participation,
decentralization, social inclusion and integration of social, cultural and political
aspects;
• Spatial aspects, including aspects such as the spatial basis (scale and territory),
strategic nature, ‘zonality’ and ‘valorization of difference’ [Jorge, do you want
to add in some text on this? If not we shall simply delete this]; and
• Operational aspects, including the relationship between planning and
management, relevance, viability, up-to-datedness and ability to deliver.
20/06/0814
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 15/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
3.2 Application of analysis
3.2.1 Economic Aspects
As in any zoning experiment, the effects of EEZ can be contradictory. In regulating
possible uses of the land, one is regulating, indirectly and simultaneously, the value of
the land (Henneberry and Barrows, 1990). The creation of zones may have effects
upon the demand for land, the supply of land, the strategic behavior of stakeholders
and the environment, generating negative externalities itself (Podogodzinski and Sass,
1990). These effects of zoning may generate inefficiencies and inequities, leading to
zoning being questioned (including in the court of law), altered or even completely
abandoned.
The effectiveness of EEZ in integrating ecological and economic aspects is
questionable in the light of experience in the Amazon. A clear example is the rate of
deforestation, leading to loss of biodiversity, one of the main negative externalities that
EEZ is supposed to avoid. This has not been reduced after the “first approximation” of
EEZ in Rondônia, for example. EEZ as yet has been unable to surmount the problem
of enforcement encountered by other protectionist legislation in Brazil since the
1960s.16 One of the reasons for this is that mandatory zoning regulations do not take
into account the economic behaviour of farmers, ranchers and loggers who undertake
“nutrient mining” in the Amazon – abandoning fields when yields diminish and clearing
new land, which is abundant.
It can be argued that EEZ could pre-empt these practices by inducing land scarcity
through the creation of parks, reserves, etc., thus raising land prices and fostering
16 The Código Florestal (Forest Law) (Brasil, 1965) states inter alia that it is forbidden to
exploit primary forests in the Amazon basin without a proper forest management plan. It ispublic knowledge that this law is seldom enforced and, in the general case in the Amazon,logging is often illegal: high-grading, trespassing and encroachment are common practices.
20/06/0815
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 16/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
more sustainable farming and forestry practices.17 This still does not address the basic
problem at the root of ineffectiveness, which is that of legitimacy. Some argue that this
problem could be solved through increased participation of stakeholders in the
decision-making process. However, we can only expect the local population to
cooperate if their opportunity cost of giving up land is somehow covered.18
Any EEZ produces costs and benefits, and different stakeholders will bear them
differently. Who and how much depends on many variables: land tenure arrangements,
definition of property rights, time horizon, population density, to name only a few.
These become more empirical than theoretical questions. Indeed, economic factors are
influential also at a macro level. It is argued that environmental degradation could have
been much worse without implementation of EEZ, and the reduced pressure for land
occupation in some states where EEZ has been implemented is cited as proof
[ref???]. However, degradation is observed equally in parts of the Amazon subjected
to EEZ and in those not so. This suggests that the rate of occupation of Amazonia has
been more influenced by macroeconomic and social factors originating outside the
region (e.g. economic incentives to move there) than by any control mechanism within
the region generated by an EEZ.
Besides not demonstrating effectiveness to date, has EEZ generated any benefits that
can justify its costs, i.e. is it efficient? A frequently mentioned benefit from all EEZ
experiments in the Brazilian Legal Amazon is the unprecedented provision of training
17 This seems to be what Nitsch (1998, p. 4) has in mind when he suggests that “Zoning byitself is restrictive (“zoning is negative”). If you want to avoid massive protests, do yourzoning in a piecemeal fashion, starting with highly critical areas. Protected areas are notwithout reason called national parks everywhere in the world, because the decision of turning a certain area into a protected one, is taken on the national, not the local level.”
18 This could be done in several ways, e.g.: 1) increasing the profitability of sustainableactivities through subsidies; 2) tax unsustainable activities to reduce their profitability;
and/or 3) reduce interest rates. These measures would reduce the need for new land, asstaying in “old” land would still be profitable. But, the adoption of these measures is subjectto the uncertainties of political process, making EEZ highly dependent on aspects beyond
20/06/0816
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 17/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
opportunities for technical staff in the public sector in some fields, such as geographical
information systems (GIS). In addition, it is argued that EEZ has yielded much
previously unknown information on the Amazon that can be fed into policy-making
[refs???]. Nevertheless, efficiency has to do with benefits in relation to costs, and from
this point of view it is clear that training and data collection could be achieved with a
much lower investment.19 Moreover, we have argued above that the information has
not been effectively fed into policy making.
Finally, advocates of EEZ claim that it will have equity impacts favorable towards the
poorest social groups, noting that economic and politically powerful interests tend to be
the principal opponents of EEZ [refs???]. This argument, however, ignores that the
apparent acceptance of EEZ by the poor and weak may be due in reality to their lack of
awareness of it. This interpretation finds support in their negative reaction where the
EEZ process definitely is known by them.20 Indeed, if EEZ is implemented and the
price of land rises due to restricted access, only economically powerful stakeholders
will be able to buy land at these higher prices. In other words, in the longer run, poor
small farmers may have to bear the costs of zoning.
3.2.2 Environmental Aspects
Nitsch (1994) questioned the assumption of shared values and ecological determinism
apparent in EEZ (see 3.1.1 above). We hold it as self-evident that concepts of nature
are socially produced. Therefore there can be no objective concept of what is “right for
the planners’ control, and therefore not dependable as a policy instrument.19 It is not easy to ascertain how much has been spent on EEZ so far, due to data
aggregations in the Brazilian budgetary system. However, it can be estimated that betweenUS$ 250 and US$ 350 million were expended on EEZ in Brazil in the last five years(source: Nogueira et al (2000)). Pogodzinski and Sass (1990) remind us that zoning willonly increase social welfare if the negative externalities it prevents exceed what it costs toimplement and monitor.
20 Rondonia’s “first approximation” failed to recognise the rights of small farmers who had
established themselves in Zones 4 and 5 before the passage of the State Zoning Law. These have resented EZZ ever since. Many small farmers also resent the fact that EEZ
20/06/0817
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 18/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
the land”. Agronomist, ecologist, timber merchant, rancher, seringueiro, indigenous
Indian - each holds a different view of what is right for the land founded on his or her
cultural and economic circumstances. It follows that the allocation of a tract of land to a
use can be determined only through some political process which mediates between
such stakeholder interests.
Becker and Egler (1997, p. 7 and pp. 9-10) emphasize that, in the Brazil of today, this
political process needs to be increasingly democratic. Yet their methodology first
assigns land a vocation through a technical procedure, which does not recognize its
value-laden nature, and only afterwards opens these decisions to review through a
political consultation process. The land allocation process also rather uncomfortably
cross-matches a narrow conception of natural vulnerability, focused on erodibility, with
a contrastingly broad-brush assessment of socio-economic development potential.
There is a suspicion here of a supply-driven approach to appraisal: the abundance of
earth science data is driving the methodology.
We suggest that, instead, a set of sustainable development operating principles should
be identified, from which can be derived criteria for appraising development proposals.
These principles should be agreed by negotiation between stakeholders (e.g. through
the CEZSEEs21) and, in keeping with our advocacy of a demand-led approach to
planning, applied toissues
of land use allocation raised through an open process in
which stakeholders participate from the outset. We outline a set of such principles in
the recommendations (see 4.2.c).
limits the amount of land available for settlements (Mahar and Ducrot, 1998).21 CEZSEEs are the State Commissions for Ecological and Socio-economic Zoning.
20/06/0818
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 19/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
3.2.3 Socio-political aspects
The socio-political objectives of zoning are crucial, as ignoring these can represent
serious obstacles to its implementation. To date EEZ has been promoted by the federal
level, and it has taken considerable time to be promoted at state level in the Amazon
states, with different approaches as noted above (3.1.2). This has paralleled the
widening of the democratic basis of the State itself in Brazil through decentralization to
state and municipal level, although it is also closely associated with reduced State
capacity at all levels. This, in turn, is feeding a growing political recognition of the need
to involve key stakeholders in the decision-making process – whether this emanates
from an ideological position as in Acre, or from a pragmatic reaction to the political
realities, as in Rondônia. In states such as Amapá, which have initiated the EEZ
process based on the methodology of Becker & Egler (1997), problems arise because
of its technocratic approach.
As argued above (3.1.1), the socio-political problems arise from two fundamental
weaknesses of the Becker & Egler methodology: (1) its basis in technical rationality
and the inherent conceptions and manifestations that this entails (“vocation” of territory,
and weak links with political and social processes); and (2) the concept that harmony
between man and nature, and consensus between interest groups, can inevitably be
reached around rationally defined goals. The result is a supply-driven methodology with
admittedly a broadening of socio-political involvement, though in a limited way, rather
than a demand-driven process which starts from socio-culturally and politically defined
needs and positions, and which seeks to negotiate resource use between different
local, national and even international interests, whether politically powerful or not. This
latter would entail a radical revision of the process, and indeed of the nature of the
appropriate strategic land use planning instruments, whether zoning or other.
20/06/0819
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 20/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
The outcome of the inherent technical determinism is usually precarious, as the
experience in Rondônia shows, and can undermine quite legitimate strategic land use
and environmental issues. An important aspect of creating an adequate socio-cultural
and political basis for land use planning is the definition of agreed objectives,
mechanisms and processes – i.e. defining the “arena” and rules” for decision-making,
and not just agreeing to or rejecting pre-defined proposals. This entails social inclusion
as an explicit objective – i.e. both avoiding creation of inequality, and decreasing
existing inequality – as well as wide participation and decentralization of decision-
making. Only in this way can a legitimate basis for the practical operationalization of
the results be created, given the vast areas and difficulties in regulation within
Amazonia. The planning process in addition has to accept that consensus may not be
reached, but that different interests can negotiate an acceptable equilibrium. It also
entails instituting processes to allow this equilibrium to be maintained and re-negotiated
in time.
Overall what is necessary is a strategic land-use planning process which establishes
certain rights and objectives, as well as access to resources (financial and technical),
and which allows decentralized initiatives to develop the most appropriate processes to
deal with the priority issues, as defined by the stakeholders. Rather than starting with a
technical exercise, inevitably loaded with values, the first step is therefore to establish a
socio-political process and suitable institutions to implement this, such as is being
proposed in Acre. However, the mechanisms to negotiate and balance conflicting
interests between local and (probably more powerful) national and international entities
also need to be created, with clear definition of institutional infrastructure and rights.
3.2.4 Spatial aspects
Two issues concern us here: scale and strategy.
20/06/0820
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 21/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
Legal Amazonia confronts the land use planner with a vast range of spatial scales from
the near-continental to the local urban. We would argue, however, that it is not quite so
vast a range as space alone suggests, because it is moderated by the very low density
of human settlement. Thus we should more properly speak of socio-spatial scale. As
indicated above (3.1.1), commentators have suggested that an EEZ formulated for the
occupation of relatively empty lands is not a useful instrument at the opposite end of
the socio-spatial spectrum. The very exclusion to date of urban areas from the EEZ
exercises in Legal Amazonia demonstrates this. The denser the settlement, the more
anthropic the landscape, the less the population is living directly off the land, and the
less appropriate is a planning instrument which is conceptually founded in agro-
ecological zoning concerned with the biological and physical potential of the land. The
question then becomes whether EEZ can still be valid as a conceptual framework, from
which may be derived variants adapted to different socio-spatial scales. The arguments
presented in the preceding sections indicate that it would need radical surgery to be so.
EEZ has from the outset been put forward as a strategic land use planning tool (see
section 2). The concept of strategy may be confused with that of scale, as reflected in
the common expression “strategic scale”. We interpret a strategic approach as
fundamentally consisting of two elements: concern with establishing general principles
rather than with applying them in specific instances; and intent to integrate the actions
of players or sectors. This implies no automatic linkage between strategy and scale. It
does, however, imply that to be a strategic land use planning tool, EEZ must be
integrative and founded on general principles. Does it pass these tests? It certainly is
founded on principles, but, as we have argued, ones which we believe render it
inappropriate at least to more anthropic contexts. We suggest that it also fails the test
of integration, because the crucial determinations are made first through a technocratic
process and only subsequently exposed to a political participative process likely to tie
in with policy making and to generate legitimacy (3.2.3).
20/06/0821
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 22/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
3.2.5 Operational aspects
An important operational aspect of ecological and economic zoning is how amenable it
is to a management rather than a planning approach. Whilst planning predicts and
fosters end states on the basis of previous states, management is based on continuous
(or more appropriately cyclical) interaction between goals, monitoring and feedback.
The EEZ methodology proposed by Beckler and Egler (1997) is a process leading to
the definition of zones, but little is said about how these zones (or indeed zoning itself)
are to be managed thereafter. In practice, in the case of Rondônia conflicts have arisen
in the management of the zoning process itself, where many commissions other than
the CEZSEE have had a remit in EEZ planning, monitoring and evaluation.
Closely related to the above is the viability of EEZ, which has to do with the availability
of sufficient resources to apply it, as well as with the necessary institutional, social and
political support. From the point of view of policy-making, EEZ is viable for the purpose
of defining zones. The production of zoning maps and documents can be a relatively
straightforward process if kept at a technical level, as in Tocantins, and the decreasing
costs of information technology can be seen to favor this kind of approach. However, it
is the subsequent implementation of EEZ that raises questions about its viability,
especially in terms of institutional, social and political support, which is raised through
other approaches rather than specifically through zoning.
Plans need to be up-to-date to be credible and relevant. Up-to-date means being
based on recent data, addressing contemporaneous issues and being within the plan’s
formal lifespan. The EEZ process tends to produce zoning documents that are ‘static’,
risking obsolescence in the face of rapidly changing realities. The EEZ policy-making
process in Amazonia does not take this into account as there is no legal determination
as to how long EEZs are to be valid. Indeed, the ‘top-down’ character of EEZ is
20/06/0822
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 23/33
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 24/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
• What new contributions, if any, has EEZ as a technique brought to strategic land
use planning in theory and practice?
• What is the relevance of EEZ, as currently conceptualized, as a strategic land use
planning tool for use in the context of Brazil, at both policy and operational levels?
• How can it contribute to a strategic land use planning process which is not only
environmentally but also politically, economically, socially and culturally sensitive,
and thus take into consideration a wide range of probably conflicting interests?
• How can it allow local, state and federal interests to be balanced with international
interests, and how can these be expressed in resource terms, as well as with an
appropriate legal basis?
• How can EEZ – or a strategic land use planning mechanism which involves land
use specification – be developed to support development of areas more affected by
human agency such as urban and rural/urban interfaces?
The authors query the innovative nature of EEZ in theory and practice. While the
techniques associated with EEZ in Brazil – and especially the Becker & Egler (1997)
methodology – have been innovative in drawing together physical and socio-economic
data as the basis for land use planning, and instituting a level of participatory decision-
making, this is arguably no more than would have been expected of a well prepared
regional or urban strategic land use plan such as a structure plan, which might well
have been better related to the real policy and operational environment. In addition, the
inherently top-down and technically-led planning tendency contains a series of
assumptions at the theoretical and policy-making level which are open to criticism.
The difficulties of instituting a standard methodology across such a vast territory with
many different potential stakeholders, and in a time of significant national and
international changes in the political economic context, have been very influential in the
20/06/0824
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 25/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
difficulties in: (1) promoting EEZ application at state level; (2) relating the exercise to
political realities and public policy formulation; and (3) its realistic implementation.
There is no doubt that states have used the international and national resources made
available to increase their institutional knowledge and capacity, but these, whilst useful
products, are not the overall objectives. It could be argued that the process is still in
course. Nevertheless, the considerable time and costs expended to date might have
been better directed to creating socio-political processes and institutions to underpin
strategic land use planning, as opposed to what have been seen as externally imposed
technical exercises that do not respond to significant local demands.
As a result we suggest that, if EEZ is to continue in its present forms, then it needs to
have a counterpart level of activity. This, rather than starting at a macro scale with a
strong technical determination and being seen as a fairly finite process, would start at
the micro scale with strong socio-cultural and political determination and be structured
as an on-going process. This counterpart activity needs the definition of legal rights
within the international, national and state contexts, and allocation of resources to
permit its economic operationalization – not only as a spatial planning instrument, but
also as a public policy instrument. Hence instead of financing a finite process through
international funding there is a need to establish economic incentives for different state,
national and international interests to be balanced with local needs and market
opportunities. This may well entail the application of some form of international
resource accounting system that integrates international and national concerns with
state and local level concerns, providing socio-economic as well as political
incentives.23
23 The potential loss of carbon in the tropical forests of Brazil has been likened to a "carbonsink" (reference? JR). To maintain a global balance of carbon emissions there isinternational pressure to reduce the destruction of the forests through burning. This raises
the potential for negotiation between Brazil and other interested parties (nations and supra-national bodies) at a political level to create socio-economic incentives to avoid forestdestruction - possibly through funding alternative forms of development. The economic basis
20/06/0825
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 26/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
Fundamentally we would suggest that zoning should primarily be seen not as
mandatory and regulatory, but as indicative, with public policy at the various state
levels supporting the desired land uses. The process of zoning needs to be
subordinated to the socio-political process, and this entails identifying the main interest
groups and their interests, and creating space for negotiation between these on
specific issues, building up to strategic issues at larger scales, instead of vice versa.
This process, instead of institutionalizing the top-down planning process, will create
institutions for managing equilibrium between external and internal interests. We
propose that such an approach can be practical and beneficial, efficient and equitable,
and moreover be applicable in both rural and urban areas – i.e. whether human
intervention is at a lower or higher intensity.
4.2 Specific recommendations
The following are specific recommendations for the future development of an
appropriate land use planning tool for Brazilian rural and urban areas:
(a) EEZ as a demand driven and cost effective planning instrument
Consideration must be given to the cost effectiveness of EEZ applications. EEZ has
been applied to date without much consideration of what is the social benefit (actual or
expected) from each unit of cost. In this context, it seems that Nitsch’s (1998)
suggestion of a more piece-meal approach to EEZ might be considered in future
selections of priority areas for EEZ application, with a more rigorous application of cost-
benefit analysis. In particular the specific activity of strategic land use planning should
be encouraged at local level through identification by stakeholders of key issues and/or
conflicts, on the basis of which strategic implications would be identified to apply EEZ
for this could be contributions from the other interested parties which would otherwise haveto invest more highly in carbon emission reduction.
20/06/0826
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 27/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
ctors.
in its new form. In addition some form of cost-benefit accountability needs to be
developed that can allow the equation of national and international strategic interests
with those at state and local levels.
(b) EEZ as a participatory decision-making process
The need to create a micro-level “bottom-up” approach in counterpart to the macro-
level “top-down” approach needs legal and institutional definition of the participatory
and socially inclusive decision-making mechanism that should underpin the planning
process. States are currently taking the initiative for EEZ application, and have a
certain amount of installed technical capacity. This would be the most obvious starting
point to ‘kick-start’ a more inclusive process, since states have legal definition powers.
Ideally the definition of the powers relevant to strategic land use planning would be
drafted at national level for refinement and promulgation of the operationalisation at
state level – i.e. the final definition of which stakeholders would be involved and in what
institutional/legal forms needs to follow similar structures nation-wide, but represent
socio-political reality at state level. These state powers would include the need to
reflect the rights of the identified stakeholders in the composition of the State
Commissions of Strategic Land Use Planning;24 the definition of rights at varying
levels of government; and the definition of rights and responsibilities between State,
private and civil society se
At national government level National Policy Guidelines for strategic land use planning
would be developed and promulgated to guide this process.25 These would be
24 These commissions would replace the current State Commissions of EEZ, thus building onexisting institutional capacity. Likewise, it is suggested the Commission for Coordination of the Ecological and Economic Zoning of the National Territory (CCEEZ) would become theNational Commission for Strategic Land Use.
25 National Planning Guidelines was initially introduced in Scotland in 1974, where it has been
developed as a structure for national policy and advice through National Policy Guidelines(NPPGs) and Planning Advice Notes (PANs). Similar guidance was introduced in Englandand Wales from 1988 (Planning Policy Guidance Notes and Minerals Planning Guidance
20/06/0827
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 28/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
indicative, but state governments would have to demonstrate their adherence to (or
justify their deviation from) these when applying for fund transfers to assist with
strategic land use planning. Existing institutional set-ups for inclusive decision-making
(where these exist) would be strengthened, and their creation encouraged where these
do not exist. The national policy guidelines would be reviewed on a regular basis by the
National Commission for Strategic Land Use Planning, based on submissions from
state-level commissions, which in turn would respond to guidance from the subordinate
levels of government and other stakeholder sectors within each state, permitting the
“valorization of differences” to be expressed.
(c) EEZ founded on principles of environmentally sustainable development
We suggested in 3.2.2 that, operating in a demand-led context, EEZ should follow a set
of principles of environmentally sustainable development. One such approach which is
gaining ground in Europe is a sequential approach along the lines of avoid Æ
mitigateÆ remedyÆ compensate:
1. Establish whether a proposed development is needed, within the planning horizon
appropriate to the matter at hand.
2. If it passes that test, establish whether the site proposed for it is one which would
minimize damage and maximize benefit to the environment. In particular, siting
should ensure that natural assets which provide essential environmental services,
and/or are not renewable within the timescale of planning (at least a human
generation), are protected.
Notes). In the 1990s Regional Planning Guidance was also developed in England. These arestatements prepared by central government to guide local governments’ implementation of strategic land use planning. These are indicative rather than mandatory although have beenseen as material in legal evidence. This "legal imperative" reinforces the economic incentivefor incorporation of national guidance in that central government can withhold needed centralfunds from local government, if strategic land use plans are not seen as adequatelyincorporating or justifying differences from this. The advantage of this system over directcentral government legislation is its flexibility in that it is finally applied and developed at local
level, while incorporating strategic national guidance, and can be adapted as needs evolvemore readily than legislative instruments - a disadvantage already encountered in EEZapplication in Brazil. See Jenkins et al (2000 forthcoming) for detail.
20/06/0828
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 29/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
3. If the proposal passes this second test, then consider how any residual damage the
development would cause to the environment could be mitigated (reduced).
4. Any adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated should be remedied (put right),
preferably at the developer’s expense.
5. If satisfactory remedy is not practicable, then the developer should provide
compensation, preferably in kind and close to the development.
One decision or action may in real life accomplish more than one step in the sequence.
Note that there is no assumption about who the developer may be – it could as well be
a public agency as a private firm.
Such an approach would implement five universal principles of sustainable
development:
• The precautionary principle, that we should hold back from actions for which there is
good evidence that they would damage the environment, even if doing so carries an
economic penalty, and even if we lack definite proof that damage would ensue. This
is particularly the case where the asset at risk cannot be renewed.
• Protection of critical natural capital, which provides services which cannot be
substituted by other natural, human or man-made assets.
• The polluter pays principle, that whoever is ultimately responsible for or benefits
from the damaging development should pay for it (this may involve the developer
passing on costs to the consumer of it, if they are not the same party).
• The best practicable environmental option, that which offers the best deal for the
environment while meeting the purpose of the development at an acceptable cost.
• Demand management, which rejects the notion that demand should automatically
be met, in favor of managing it to husband natural resources.
20/06/0829
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 30/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
The details of how such an approach would be implemented would depend on the legal
and planning regimes obtaining in each state. However, two “process principles” which
could be applied to implement it would include strategic environmental appraisal of
EEZ and similar planning exercises, and the use of sustainability indicators to assist
such appraisals and more generally to monitor progress towards adopted targets.
(d) EEZ as an open knowledge sharing mechanism
In close relationship to point (b) above, access to information and knowledge through
institutional channels needs to be opened up. This would avoid, for instance, situations
in which the Secretariat of the Environment of a given state has almost no information
on an EEZ that has been developed by the Secretariat of Planning of the same state.
Allied to this, a better defined “division of labor” among public institutions seems to be
essential if EEZ is to be established as one of the permanent tools of strategic land use
planning in the region. It is recommended that regional universities and research
institutions must have a clear and active role in that "division of labor”. Related to this
point, technicians in the region complained of the “black box” type of product that has
been delivered by consultant firms contracted to develop the EEZ, in particular by
national engineering firms (Nogueira et al, 2000). Technicians do not know how the
results (usually maps) have been arrived at; promised training courses have not been
delivered; and in contracting these firms a “top-down approach” is almost automatically
implemented. It seems that states must be more selective in contracting consultant
firms; in particular they must decide beforehand very clearly what they really want.
(e) EEZ as an educational tool
The production of information and knowledge through EEZ at micro- and macro-levels
should be used both as a process to increase both technical/planning skills within
relevant institutions, and also as a general educational tool to permit changes of
20/06/0830
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 31/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
attitudes and a broadening of the understanding of issues related to environment and
development. This is essential in any process of socio-political negotiation and is also
essential to the operationalisation of the decisions reached. To be effective EEZ has to
produce something recognized to be of value by the wider community who will support
its application. Without this form of popular support the results of strategic land use
planning will not go much further than colored maps and declarations of intent.
4.3 On-going investigation
This paper has raised a wide number of issues concerning various aspects of
ecological-economic zoning – concerning its past, its recent application, and its future.
It has reviewed theoretical, policy-related and operational issues and made a wide-
ranging analysis, albeit limited in depth due to space. The objective of the paper has
been to stimulate debate on ecological-economic zoning per se, and its specific
relevance to urban areas, as a strategic land use planning instrument. Many of the
issues raised have not been resolved, and the general and specific recommendations
above represent work in progress. The institutions indicated in the first footnote
continue to develop research into appropriate methodologies for strategic land use
planning in urban areas which incorporates ecological-economic zoning experience in
Brazil, as well as international experience. The results of this work will be disseminated
internationally through appropriate publications and the Internet.
5. References
Banco Mundial (s/d) Programa Piloto para a proteção das Florestas Tropicais noBrasil. Banco Mundial, Brasília.
Becker, B. K. and Egler, C. A. G. (1997) Details of the methodology for execution of ecological-economic zoning by the states of the legal Amazon region. MMA/SAE,
Brasília.
20/06/0831
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 32/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
Brasil (1965) Código Florestal, Lei no. 4,771, 15/09/1965.
IBGE (1986) Termos de referência para uma proposa de zoneamento ecológico-econômico do Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), Rio de J aneiro.
J enkins, P., Raemaekers, J . and Smith, H. (2000 forthcoming) An overview of planningexperience in the United Kingdom possibly relevant to EEZ. Caderno de Pesquisa emDesenvolvimento Agrícola e Economia do Meio Ambiente. Série NEPAMA.Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.
Mahar, D. J . (1989) Government policies and deforestation in Brazil's Amazon region.World Wildlife Fund and World Bank, Washington.
Mahar, D. J . and Ducrot, E. H. (1998) Land–Use Zoning on Tropical Frontiers.Emerging Lessons from the Brazilian Amazon. Economic Development Institute, WorldBank, Washington.
Millikan, B. H. (1998) Zoneamento Sócio-Econômico-Ecológico no Estado deRondônia: Análise de um Instrumento de Ordenamento Territorial na Fronteira Amazônica. Projeto BRA/94/007 (PNUD/PLANFLORO), Porto Velho, Rondônia.
Nitsch, M. (1994) Riscos do planejamento regional na Amazônia Brasileira:observações relativas a lógica complexa do zoneamento. In Amazonia e a crise damodernização, M. A. D'Incao and I. Maciel da Silveira (eds.). Museu Parense EmilioGoeldi, Belem, 501-512.
Nitsch, M. (1998) Planejamento sem rumo. Avaliação critica do ZoneamentoEcológico-econômico nos Estados da Amazonia Brasileira. Parecer elaborado para a
Secretaria de Planejamento do Estado de Rondônia. Projeto de Cooperação TecnicaPNUD/PLANAFLORO (BRA/94/007), Berlin.
Nogueira, J . M., Chaves, F. T., de Medeiros, M. A. A. and Versiani, L. (2000)Ecological-economic zoning. Its conception, development and application in Brazil andrelevance as a strategic planning tool for urban areas. Caderno de Pesquisa emDesenvolvimento Agrícola e Economia do Meio Ambiente. Série NEPAMA 009.Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.
Pogodzinski, J . M. and Sass, T. R. (1990) The economic theory of zoning: a criticalreview, Land Economics, 66(3), 294-314.
Schubart, H. O. R. (1994) O Zoneamento Ecológico-econômico como instrumento parao desenvolvimento sustentâvel da Amazônia. In Amazonia e a crise da modernização,M. A. D'Incao and I. Maciel da Silveira (eds.). Museu Parense Emilio Goeldi, Belem,493-500.
SDR/PR (1990) Um Modelo de Administração para a Política Nacional deDesenvolvimento Regional: Sistema Integrado para o DesenvolvimentoRegional/SIDER. Documento de Trabalho n. 3 (Versão Ampliada), Projeto FAO/PNUD,BRA/87/037. Secretaria do Desenvolvimento Regional/Presidência da República(SDR/PR), Brasília.
Steinberger, M. (1997a) O Zoneamento Ecológico-econômico como instrumento deordenamento territorial urbano e regional, Revista Agora, [vol no? Issue no? Pages?]
20/06/0832
7/27/2019 JMN ZEEinBrazil
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jmn-zeeinbrazil 33/33
Ecological-economic zoning in Brazil – an analysis of its application to date andrelevance as a strategic land-use planning tool.
Steinberger, M. (1997b) O Zoneamento Ecológico-econômico e o poder local.Conference proceedings of the VII Colloquium on Local Authorities, [Organisinginstitution?], Salvador.
Steinberger, M. (1997c) O Zoneamento Ecológico-econômico como instrumento paratomada de decisões campartilhada. Paper presented at the Inter-American ConferenceDimensões humanas da mudança climática global e do manejo sustentável dasflorestas das Americas, Brasília.