Slide 1

Jenny Field Jenny.Field@wintec.ac.nz Investigating different approaches to reading in a multi-level class

Slide 2

Background Foundation Focused Training Opportunities course 2013 TEC funded 37 week course of 30 hours per week Operated within Waikato Institute of Technology in the Centre for Languages

Slide 3

Countries of origin in FFTO class

Slide 4

Students 22 students,range of ethnicities Age range 18 53, mainly in 20s and 30s Mainly refugee backgrounds Mostly lived in New Zealand for less than 2 years Range of educational backgrounds 3 -10 years schooling Range of L1 literacy from Starting Points Level 1 through to High School Certificate Three students already had part time employment

Slide 5

Slide 6

Some literature about Reading . the ability to read well makes an enormous difference to ones school performance, career potential and personal success. (Kearsley, 2002; Lo Bianco & Freebody, 1997).

Slide 7

Reading in a second language involves adapting the schemata already developed in the first language to the second language Controlled texts assist this process Second language readers have greater metalinguistic and metacognitive awareness which enables them to readily transfer their L1 skills when reading in another language Nation (2009) p.7

Slide 8

The FFTO programme Aimed to support English language development so that students can gain employment or move to further training TEC funded (discontinued in December 2013) had contractual outcomes Level 1 Certificate in Training Opportunities (Wintec) Balanced reading programme (Nation 2009)

Slide 9

Reading programme Workbooks for unit standards with content for Unit standard e.g Roles and responsibilities of employees and employers. Students complete workbooks cooperatively. Daily silent reading: Extensive Reading programme 15 minutes a day. Students obtained graded readers from Wintec Library. Class Reading time: Used available texts National Literacy series and others. Intensive reading; predicting, gaining meaning from text, observing syntax. 2 hours in computer room per week Study ladder, FLAX (stories and tasks), Reviewed episodes of Sisters and Brothers, on Australia Network. Wintec resources: In Words of One Syllable Shared reading using short sentences of basic sight words. Picture Dictionary: High frequency words organised phonetically. Students used these on a daily basis

Slide 10

.Activities outside the classroom

Slide 11

Slide 12

Research questions What are the students perspectives in relation to: methods and approaches used in the programme that are helping them to read better? Reading methods or approaches that are more helpful than others? other factors that influence gains in Reading?

Slide 13

Class survey 3 times (July, Sept, Nov) Reading activity How it has helped you Reading English online (web pages, emails). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Very helpful Quite helpful Not very helpful The reading workbooks for the unit standards 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Very helpful Quite helpful Not very helpful Class work: vocabulary, comprehension, grammar exercises 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Very helpful Quite helpful Not very helpful FLAX stories in the Computer Lab 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Very helpful Quite helpful Not very helpful continued Daily Silent reading with readers from the Wintec Library 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Very helpful Quite helpful Not very helpful The Green book In Words of One Syllable 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Very helpful Quite helpful Not very helpful The Yellow Book Picture Dictionary 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Very helpful Quite helpful Not very helpful

Slide 14

Interviews Two interviews with the tutor and a bilingual assistant The students were interviewed in a group with others with the same native language What aspects of the Reading programme have helped you to read better?

Slide 15

Survey results Very helpful Quite helpful Not very helpful

Slide 16

Results from Interviews Although high correlation that all approaches were useful there was a wide variety of responses for each approach about why they were useful Silent reading divergent responses prefer to read aloud so I could be corrected. Others said that they like reading silently as reading aloud is too difficult. I prefer reading silently as it helps me to focus. The value of reading a wide range of texts had a high level of correlation, although half of the class thought reading easy books was most helpful

Slide 17

Range of students perceptions about what helps with reading Reading the books that the tutors give us is really helpful. When I read them I think Oh, this is how they write. I like reading long books. I like fiction and mystery and I read at home. Every morning I read at home. I read the paper from New World, Forlongs and Countdown. I read the specials. Reading silently helps me because reading aloud is too difficult, but when its silent it helps me to focus. Silent reading is good but I prefer to read aloud so I can be corrected. I remember the words I forgot when I write. We cant understand too much. Too much vocabulary.

Slide 18

Other resources also highly valued the Picture Dictionary In Words of one syllable. The green book helps me to understand reading better. Now I can just look and understand. The computer based FLAX programme FLAX is really good because sometimes I miss the word. It helps to develop skills for reading and thinking about the meaning. Confident dictionary users. When the teacher tells me a story I use my English-Burmese dictionary to find out the meanings of words. They also used Google Translate.

Slide 19

Discussion No clear themes emerged as to what approach was most helpful so data was re-examined Allwright (2006) .. a change from a precision approach to a scattergun approach to teaching is a promising directions in Applied Linguistics if we accept the notion of the essential idiosyncrasy of humanity, then there are two possible responses that can be made. Either we match the individual differences of the people around, or we decide to offer a scattergun approach whereby you offer a multitude of learning opportunities and expect them to select according to their needs.

Slide 20

Some literature on learner autonomy..the capacity of the learner to take control of ones own learning. (Benson, 2003, p.50) measuring autonomy is difficult (Benson, 2003) measuring autonomy is difficult in that autonomy is a multidimensional construct (p. 51) behaviours can take numerous different forms depending on their age, how far they have progressed with their learning, what they perceive their immediate learning needs to be..Autonomy in other words can manifest itself in many different ways. (Little,1991,p. 4)

Slide 21

Findings Students developed their reading skills over the 37 week course. A strong possibility that students took from the programme what they needed They were able to verbalise what had helped them to read better Each approach received a positive mention from students

Slide 22

Multi-level classes Many ESOL classes have learners diverse literacy, educational, orthographic backgrounds Meeting individual needs can be daunting I suggest that focusing on a broad approach that satisfies individual goals, but involves working together cooperatively in pairs and groups as a community of learners

Slide 23

Conclusion aligns with Freeman, Freeman and Mercuri (2002) 1. Engage students in challenging theme-based curriculum to develop academic competence 2. Draw on students backgrounds - their experiences, cultures and languages 3. Organise collaborative activities and scaffolding to build their academic English proficiency 4. Create confident students who value themselves as learners

Slide 24

FFTO learners graduating with a Certificate in Training Opportunities for Speakers of Other Languages Level 1

Slide 25

Bibliography Benson, P.(2011). Teaching and Researching Autonomy. (2ndEd.). Harlow,UK:Longman Pearson Holec,H.( 1988). Autonomy and self-directed learning present fields of application. Strasburg: Council of Europe Nation, I.S.P. (2009) Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York: Routledge. Allwright,D. (2006) Understanding the Language Classroom New York, Palgrave Macmillan Freeman, Freeman and Mercuri (2002). Closing the achievement Gap: How to Reach Limited- Formal Schooling and Long Term English learners: Portsmouth, Heinemann,