James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

129
Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet [Problems with Theories, Experiments in Plug Assist] James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347 Paper presented at 2004 Thermoforming Conference Indianapolis IN

description

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet [ Problems with Theories, Experiments in Plug Assist]. James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347. Paper presented at 2004 Thermoforming Conference Indianapolis IN. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Page 1: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and

Sheet

[Problems with Theories, Experiments in Plug Assist]

James L. ThroneSherwood Technologies, Inc.Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Paper presented at

2004 Thermoforming Conference

Indianapolis IN

Page 2: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Objective

To better understand the problems with theories and experiments in plug assist thermoforming

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 3: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Caveat

It is my intent to raise concerns about the ways in which we view the interaction between the plug and the sheet

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 4: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Caveat

It is my intent to raise concerns about the ways in which we view the interaction between the plug and the sheet

It is NOT my intent to provide answers to the questions about the interfacial conditions between the plug and the sheet

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 5: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Think about this Question!

In plug-assist thermoforming,In plug-assist thermoforming,what is sliding against what?what is sliding against what?

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 6: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Outline

I. A discussion of the coefficient of friction issue

II. A sliding experimentIII. Some prototypical plug

experimentsIV. Conclusions

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 7: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

I. Some thoughts on the coefficient of friction

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 8: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Coefficient of FrictionCoefficient of Friction• Frictional characteristics

considered part of tribology• Tribology is study of friction,

lubrication and wear• Traditional view is that all three are

extant in thermoforming

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 9: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

“The relation that the power required to move a body bears to the weight or pressure on the body is known as the coefficient of friction.”

W.M. Davis, Friction and Lubrication, A Handbook For Engineers, Mechanics, Superintendents and Managers, The Lubrication Publishing Co., Pittsburgh PA, 1903.

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Historical views of coefficient of friction-I

Page 10: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

“The coefficient of friction is the ratio between the resistance to motion and the perpendicular pressure.”

W.M. Davis, Friction and Lubrication, A Handbook For Engineers, Mechanics, Superintendents and Managers, The Lubrication Publishing Co., Pittsburgh PA, 1903.

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Historical Views of coefficient of friction-II

Page 11: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

“There is no other element in connection with… lubrication… that has received so much consideration as that of the coefficient of friction, and yet there is no other that is in so indeterminable a state…”

Mr. Hall, Car Lubrication, ca. 1900 - cited in W.M. Davis,Friction and Lubrication, A Handbook For Engineers, Mechanics, Superintendents and Managers, The Lubrication Publishing Co., Pittsburgh PA, 1903.

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Historical Views of coefficient of friction-III

Page 12: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

“While the coefficient of friction must always be taken into consideration when designing and constructing machinery, it is not always practicable to calculate it with any degree of accuracy, [and] in fact it can only be determined absolutely by experiment.”

W.M. Davis,Friction and Lubrication, A Handbook For Engineers, Mechanics, Superintendents and Managers, The Lubrication Publishing Co., Pittsburgh PA, 1903.

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Historical views of coefficient of friction-IV

Page 13: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Coefficient of FrictionCoefficient of Friction

Following discussion assumes that frictional effects are extant in plug-assisted thermoforming

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 14: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Blunt-nose plug moving into sheetContact may involve some sheet sliding

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 15: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Frictional Conditions Between Plug* And Sheet

• Static CoF, no sliding (coefficient max)

• Sliding CoF, no static (coefficient zero)

• Some static, some sliding• Slip-stick behavior

*or mold wall

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 16: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Frictional Conditions Between Plug* And Sheet

• Static CoF, no sliding (coefficient max)• Sliding CoF, no static (coefficient zero)• Some static, some sliding• Slip-stick behavior

*or mold wallWhich of these are relevant when plastic

stretches against plug surface?

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 17: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Coefficient of FrictionCoefficient of Friction• Static CoF - Initiation of sliding

between plug (and mold wall) and sheet

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 18: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Coefficient of FrictionCoefficient of Friction• Static CoF - Initiation of sliding

between plug (and mold wall) and sheet

• Sliding CoF- Continuation of sliding between plug (and mold wall) and sheet

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 19: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Coefficient of FrictionCoefficient of Friction• Static CoF - Initiation of sliding

between plug (and mold wall) and sheet

• Sliding CoF - Continuation of sliding between plug (and mold wall) and sheet

• Static friction value usually 100s to 1000s greater than sliding friction value, but not always!

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 20: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Sliding Coefficient of FrictionSliding Coefficient of Friction• Contact area increases with increasing

load

Plastic sheet

Plug

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 21: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Sliding Coefficient of FrictionSliding Coefficient of Friction• Contact area increases with increasing load• Ergo, coefficient independent of load

Plastic sheet

Plug

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 22: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

• Are there other factors influencing the interaction between the plug and the sheet?

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 23: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

• Are there other factors influencing the interaction between the plug and the sheet?

• Wear

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 24: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Sliding Coefficient of FrictionSliding Coefficient of FrictionWear v. sliding friction

Friction maximum in polymer transition region

Wear minimum in polymer transition region

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 25: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Sliding Coefficient of FrictionSliding Coefficient of Friction

Friction maximum, wear minimum in polymer transition region

Glass Transition Region

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 26: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

• Are there other factors influencing the interaction between the plug and the sheet?

• Wear• Dry v. wet sliding

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 27: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Dry v. “wet” slidingDry v. “wet” sliding• Dry sliding assumes no lube between

surfaces

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 28: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Dry v. “wet” slidingDry v. “wet” sliding• Dry sliding assumes no lube between

surfaces• Plastics exude small molecules (low MW

polymers, additives, processing aids)

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 29: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Dry v. “wet” slidingDry v. “wet” sliding• Dry sliding assumes no lube between

surfaces• Plastics exude small molecules (low MW

polymers, additives, processing aids)• Small molecules reside between plug and

sheet

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 30: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Dry v. “wet” slidingDry v. “wet” sliding• Dry sliding assumes no lube between

surfaces• Plastics exude small molecules (low MW

polymers, additives, processing aids)• Small molecules reside between plug and

sheet• Small molecules transfer from sheet to

plug

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 31: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Dry v. “wet” slidingDry v. “wet” sliding• Dry sliding assumes no lube between

surfaces• Plastics exude small molecules (low MW

polymers, additives, processing aids)• Small molecules reside between plug and

sheet• Small molecules transfer from sheet to plug• Interface may go from dry to wet (or wet to

dry!) as plug advances into sheet

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 32: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

• Are there other factors influencing the interaction between the plug and the sheet?

• Wear• Dry v. wet sliding

– More than one type of wet sliding

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 33: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Two types of wet sliding• Boundary lubrication – low sliding

velocity, low interfacial viscosity, high loading

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 34: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Two types of wet sliding• Boundary lubrication – low sliding

velocity, low interfacial viscosity, high loading

• Hydraulic or hydrodynamic lubrication – high sliding velocity, high viscosity, low loading

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 35: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Two types of wet sliding• Boundary lubrication – low sliding

velocity, low interfacial viscosity, high loading

• Hydraulic or hydrodynamic lubrication – high sliding velocity, high viscosity, low loading

• Boundary lubrication occurs during start/top activities [as might be the case with plugs in contact with sheet]

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 36: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Two types of wet sliding• Boundary lubrication – low sliding velocity,

low interfacial viscosity, high loading• Hydraulic or hydrodynamic lubrication –

high sliding velocity, high viscosity, low loading

• Boundary lubrication occurs during start/top activities [as might be the case with plugs in contact with sheet]

• Boundary lube friction 100s greater than hydraulic lube friction

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 37: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Two types of wet slidingSheet does not move far under plug

force

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 38: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Measuring Frictional Coefficients

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 39: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Traditional methods ofmeasuring coefficient of friction

• Weight sliding on inclined surface

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 40: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Traditional methods ofmeasuring coefficient of friction

• Tabor “Abrasor” – stylus rubbing on rotating disk

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 41: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Traditional…• Other

methods• No methods

entirely applicable to measuring plug-sheet friction…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 42: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Observations• Frictional resistance is a complex

issue:o Static v. slidingo Dry v. weto The extent of slidingo Boundary v. hydrodynamic effects

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 43: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Observations• Frictional resistance is a complex

issue:o Static v. slidingo Dry v. weto The extent of slidingo Boundary v. hydrodynamic effects

• Standard frictional devices may not give reliable results

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 44: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Are We Answering the Question?

In plug-assist thermoforming,In plug-assist thermoforming,

what is sliding against what?what is sliding against what?

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 45: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

II. A sliding experiment

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 46: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Traditional…• Other methods• No methods

entirely applicable to measuring plug-sheet friction (except g but modified)

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 47: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug-sheet friction – experiment• Consider figure below…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 48: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug-sheet friction – experiment• Consider figure below…

– A is plug material, B is plastic sheet, p is applied load

– Plug material moved against sheet…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 49: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug-sheet friction – experiment• Consider figure below…

– First, plug, sheet surfaces examined optically (100X or SEM)

– Plug mounted in fixture, load similar to applied plug force applied…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 50: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug-sheet friction – experiment• Consider figure below…

– Sheet placed on hot plate, heated to forming temperature

– Plug heated to 20C of the sheet temperature…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 51: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug-sheet friction – experiment• Consider figure below…

– Plug pressed against sheet– Moved at slow rate (~ 1 mm/sec, say)

against sheet, then stopped…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 52: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug-sheet friction – experiment• Consider figure below…

– Plug then lifted and indexed to new place on sheet

– Plug held away from sheet for period of time (10 sec, say)…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 53: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug-sheet friction – experiment• Consider figure below…

– Plug then placed against sheet and moved other direction at (~ 1 mm/sec, say)

– After 10 (say) to-and-fro motions, plug removed from fixture and examined…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 54: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug-sheet friction – experiment• Consider figure below…

– Plug surface examined optically (100X or SEM)

– Scrapings from plug surface chemically analyzed (FTIR) to determine mat’l transfer…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 55: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug-sheet friction – experiment• Consider figure below…

– New plug examined, then heated and brought in contact with fresh sheet surface

– Plug moved to-and-fro 100 times, then examined optically and chemically…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 56: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug-sheet friction – experiment• Consider figure below…

– Only after material transfer level reaches constant value…

– is resistance to sliding measured, using strain gauge or load cell…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 57: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Experiment #1• E&C Syntactic Foam, sanded w/180 grit,

blown with oil-free air• Normal stress= 3 lb/in2

• Hot plate temp setting = 162+/-2oF• 0.120 inch black GP-PS sheet• Block held on sheet 10 s, moved 10 cm in

10 sec, then removed and cooled 15 s• Force measured once block moved• Concluded after 10 contacts

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 58: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Experiment #2• E&C Syntactic Foam, sanded w/180 grit,

blown with oil-free air• Normal stress= 3 lb/in2

• Hot plate temp setting = 162+/-2oF• 0.120 inch black GP-PS sheet• Block immediately moved 10 cm in 10 s,

then removed and cooled 15 s• Force measured once block moved• Concluded after 40 contacts

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 59: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ParametersFixed

Sheet, heater temperatureSliding length, times

MeasuredForceBlock surface temperature

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 60: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 61: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 62: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 63: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Visual Observations• After 10 contacts in Expt #1, plug

surface is smoother and grayer

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 64: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Visual Observations• After 10 contacts in Expt #1, plug

surface is smoother and grayer• After 40 contacts in Expt #2, plug

surface is gray, with small <1 micron specks in surface

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 65: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Mea Culpa• Syntactic foam blocks were sent to

local university for FTIR reflectance and ESCA measurements in August 2001

• Blocks mysteriously disappeared (!)• Retesting to obtain new samples

has not yet begun

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 66: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Observations• Hot plate experiments yield time-

dependent force

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 67: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Observations• Hot plate experiments yield time-

dependent force• Force is dependent on plug surface

temperature

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 68: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

III. Some prototypical plug experiments

[Focus on ball or spherical plugs]

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 69: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug design characteristics - Plug types

Tapered, bullet- or bull-nosed

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 70: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plug design characteristics - Plug typesTapered, bullet- or bull-nosed

ApplicationsVery deep drawsWhere thinning of sidewall is

criticalWhere wall thickness is criticalWhere polymer chills rapidly

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 71: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Blunt-nose plug moving into sheetContact may involve some sheet sliding

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 72: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Load Creep• Rough acrylic

under load – increasing time or increasing temperature

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 73: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Load Creep• Rough acrylic

under load• Red – low temp

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 74: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Load Creep• Rough acrylic

under load• Red – low temp• Yellow – medium

temp

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 75: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Load Creep• Rough acrylic

under load• Red – low temp• Yellow – medium

temp• Blue – high temp

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 76: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Load Creep• Rough acrylic

under load• Red – low temp• Yellow – medium

temp• Blue – high temp• Note increasing

contact area with increasing temperature

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 77: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Sheet stretching characteristics• Sheet stretched in uniaxial, biaxial,

equibiaxial and plane strain modes• Mathematical models include

Ogden doubly-infinite power-law Mooney form of Rivlin strain energy

function Plane strain linear law K-BKZ viscoelastic model

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 78: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Sheet stretching characteristics• Sheet stretched in uniaxial, biaxial,

equibiaxial and plane strain modes• Mathematical models include

Ogden doubly-infinite power-law Mooney form of Rivlin strain energy

function Plane strain linear law K-BKZ viscoelastic model

• Plugs stretch sheet in plane strain

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 79: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plane strain stretching, cont.

Top and side view of plug-assisted stretching

[Circles appear as circles from top…]

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 80: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plane strain stretching, cont.

Top and side view of plug-assisted stretching

[Circles appear as circles from top, are actually distorted]

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 81: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plane strain stretching, cont.Mooney-Rivlin equation: = (2-1/)(2C1+2C2/)

For plane strain:(l

2-1)1/2(1-1/l2)=(F/2r)(2C1-2C2)/to

Where 1/l= h = t/to

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 82: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plane strain stretchingForce F required to stretch sheet to a

depth with a flat plug:

F = 2E(T)to/ln (a/b)

Where E(T) is temperature-dependent modulus, to is initial sheet thickness, a is plug diameter, b is sheet diameter

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 83: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Plane strain stretching,

cont.Comparison of

theories and flat plug

experimental data –

JLT, 1986

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 84: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

2004 Experiments on Spherical PlugsInto Circular Sheets

• 0.015-inch natural rubber sheet, 6.75-inch diameter

• Two wooden sphere diametersSmall ball diameter = 0.75 inchLarge ball diameter = 3 inch

• Force and penetration measured with scales

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 85: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Schematic of Plug Experiment

Left Half-Initial Plug Position

Page 86: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Schematic of Plug Experiment

Right Half-Plug Position During Sheet Stretching

Page 87: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 88: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Large Sphere Surface Treatment1. As-is [rough-grained exterior pine]2. Sanded w/200 grit paper3. Wood-putty-filled, sanded w/320 grit

paper4. Filled, sanded, and polished5. Filled, sanded, polished and talc-

coated6. Filled, sanded, polished and coated

with lube

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 89: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Measurements• Height of plug into sheet• Force• Diameter of spherical cap

Calculations• Area of spherical cap• Area of truncated cone• Thickness of sheet

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 90: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 91: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 92: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 93: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 94: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 95: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Thickness of free portion of membrane

Two extremes shown in next figure

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 96: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Thickness of free portion of membrane

Two extremes shown in next figure• If sheet slides on surface (friction

coeff=0), thickness is uniform everywhere

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 97: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 98: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Thickness of free portion of membrane

Two extremes shown in next figure• If sheet slides on surface (friction

coeff=0), thickness is uniform everywhere

• If sheet sticks to surface (friction coeff=1), sheet on cap is original thickness

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 99: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 100: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ExperimentDraw a circle on the free portion of the

sheet…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 101: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ExperimentDraw a circle on the free portion of the

sheet…Press the plug into the sheet to a given

depth…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 102: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ExperimentDraw a circle on the free portion of the

sheet…Press the plug into the sheet to a given

depth…Measure the major and minor axes of

the ellipse (a and b)…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 103: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ExperimentDraw a circle on the free portion of the

sheet…Press the plug into the sheet to a given

depth…Measure the major and minor axes of the

ellipse (a and b)…Use the relative areal draw ratio equation

Rarel = r2/ab

to calculate reduced thickness, 1/ Rarel

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 104: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Comparison of Theory and ExperimentPenetration No Frict Max Frict

Exptl*2.0 in 0.832 0.813 0.8052.4 in 0.778 0.738 0.744

* Average of 9-10 experiments

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 105: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Solid Circles – Measured Red Tk

Page 106: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Sheet ThicknessWhat about the relationship between

stretching force and sheet thickness?

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 107: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Sheet ThicknessWhat about the relationship between

stretching force and sheet thickness?

According to plane strain theory, the force increases in proportion to the thickness.

Does this hold true for this experiment?

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 108: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 109: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ObservationsThe nature of the dry plug surface

does not substantially affect the amount of force needed to stretch the membrane

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 110: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ObservationsThe nature of the dry plug surface

does not substantially affect the amount of force needed to stretch the membrane

It appears that from simple measurements, the sheet adheres to rather than slides on the dry plug

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 111: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Lubed InterfaceSo far, all experiments have been

with a presumed dry interface…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 112: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Lubed InterfaceSo far, all experiments have been

with a presumed dry interface…

Remember the discussion on wet v. dry sliding?

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 113: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Lubed InterfaceSo far, all experiments have been

with a presumed dry interface…

Remember the discussion on wet v. dry sliding? What happens if the interface is lubricated?

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 114: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Lubed Interface

Large plug coated with…• Heavy grease [oil-based]• Glycerin [water-based]

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 115: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 116: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ObservationsSo, what happened when the

interface is lubricated?

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 117: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ObservationsSo, what happened when the

interface is lubricated?If it’s oil-lubed, essentially nothing..

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 118: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ObservationsSo, what happened when the

interface is lubricated?If it’s oil-lubed, essentially nothing..But if it’s water-lubed, stretching

force is reduced…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 119: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ObservationsSo, what happened when the

interface is lubricated?If it’s oil-lubed, essentially nothing..But if it’s water-lubed, stretching

force is reduced…[This obviously needs more study!]

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 120: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

IV. Conclusions

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 121: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ConclusionsFrom simple plug experiments, it is

apparent (at least to me) that the interaction between the plug and the sheet is not clearly defined

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 122: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ConclusionsFrom simple plug experiments, it is

apparent (at least to me) that the interaction between the plug and the sheet is not clearly defined

It is not apparent (again, at least to me) that coefficient of friction is an appropriate measure of this interaction

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 123: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ConclusionsSimple measurements show applied

force increases with increasing sheet thickness

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 124: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ConclusionsSimple measurements show applied

force increases with increasing sheet thickness

Something is going on when the interface is lubricated. But why is the force reduced only when the lube is water-based?

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 125: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ConclusionsFurthermore, one might anticipate

that with thick-gauge sheet, compression and shear might also be important - in addition to (or instead of) sliding.

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 126: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

ConclusionsFurthermore, one might anticipate

that with thick-gauge sheet, compression and shear might also be important - in addition to (or instead of) sliding.

But the question remains…

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 127: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

In plug-assist In plug-assist thermoforming,thermoforming,

what is sliding against what?what is sliding against what?

TF Conference 2004 – Throne

Frictional Coefficients Between Plug and Sheet

Page 128: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

Questions?

Page 129: James L. Throne Sherwood Technologies, Inc. Dunedin Florida 34698-3347

THANK YOU THANK YOU FOR YOUR FOR YOUR ATTENTIONATTENTION!!