IR Spectroscopy of M + (Acetone) Complexes (M=Mg, Al, Ca): Cation-Carbonyl Binding Interactions
description
Transcript of IR Spectroscopy of M + (Acetone) Complexes (M=Mg, Al, Ca): Cation-Carbonyl Binding Interactions
IR Spectroscopy of M+(Acetone) Complexes (M=Mg, Al, Ca): Cation-
Carbonyl Binding Interactions
E. D. Pillai, J. Velasquez, P.D. Carnegie, M. A. Duncan
Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602-2556
www.arches.uga.edu/~maduncan/
Why Study M+(Acetone)Complexes• M+ binding in proteins often takes place at the carbonyl
groups of amino acids.
• Vibrational spectroscopy can provide insight into the cation binding site and condition.
• In proteins, the carbonyl or “amide I” region or the IR spectra are overlapped by absorptions from other functional groups.
• IR spectroscopy of gas phase M+(Acetone) complexes isolates the cation-carbonyl interaction providing valuable insight into the bonding mechanism.
Production of coldmetal ion complexeswith laser vaporization/supersonic expansion.
Mass selection of cationsby time-of-flight.
Tunable infrared laserphotodissociationspectroscopy.
LaserVision OPO/OPA2000-4500 cm-1
AgGaSe2 Crystal800-1800 cm-1V
0
Binding Energies of Complexes Relevant for This Study
Complex Theory Experimental
Energy kcal/mol
Mg+(Acetone) 41.3 (14455 cm-1) 41.445.6 (15960 cm-1)
Al+(Acetone) 41.542.7
Ca+(Acetone) 41.0
Mg+(Ar) 3.70(1295 cm-1)Al+(Ar) 2.81(982.3 cm-1)Ca+(Ar) 2.00(700 cm-1)
Rare Gas “Tagging”
IR(hMg+-ArD0 = 1295 cm-1
Mg+-CH3COCH3
D0 = 14445 cm-1
+1Duncan et al. J.Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 3293. 2Dunbar et al. J. Phys. Chem. 2005, 109, 1411.
~1700 cm-1
Mg+
Mg+
Ar
Ar
0 400 800 1200 1600
m/z
1
2
8
Mg+(CH3COCH3)
1560 1580 1600 1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720
cm-1
Mg+(acetone)Ar
Al+(acetone)Ar
Ca+(acetone)Ar
1653
1678
1622
1643
1674
1731
The IRPD spectra are measured in the Ar loss channel exhibit resonances in the 1700 cm-1 region.
Mg+ and Ca+ complexes have two bands in the region whereas Al+ has only one.
All bands are red-shifted as compared to free C=O stretch in acetone
Al+ complex band is shifted farthest to the red.
M+
The C=O red shifts are consistent with M+ binding to the carbonyl of acetone
The bonding mechanism involves the M+ withdrawing electron density via a - type donation from the HOMO and HOMO –1 orbitals (b2 and b1) of acetone.
This weakens the C=O bond, thus lowering its frequency.
For transition metals -back bonding also exists. However, Mg+, Al+, and Ca+ have no d-electrons.
Ionic Radius
Al+ 72 pm
Mg+ 82 pm
Ca+ 118 pm
Al+ induces greatest red shift on C=O stretch.
The red shift is result of M+ polarizing electron density from the carbonyl.
Such polarization of electron density is optimized when the charge density of the M+ is greatest.
Al+ with its closed shell configuration (3s2) most closely resembles a point charge.
The Magnitude of the Red-Shifts
The Doublet Features in the Mg+ and Ca+
Complexes Different isomeric structures for M+ binding are not predicted by theory.
The possibility of enol- and keto- tautamers is intriguing but DFT calculations show the enol species to lie at a much higher energy.
M+M+0.0 kcal/mol 25 kcal/mol
The final possibility to consider is a Fermi resonance. A Fermi resonance may occur when there is an accidental near-degeneracy of any two or more vibrational states (fundamentals, overtones, or combinations) having the same frequency.
C-C-C stretch has same symmetry as C=O (a1) and its overtone is nearly degenerate with C=O of Mg+ and Ca+.
For Al+, since C=O stretch is shifted far, no near-degeneracy exists.
Complex VibrationalFrequency (cm-1)
Mg+(Acetone) sym C-C-C 839stretch
C=O stretch 1680 (1663)
Al+(Acetone) sym C-C-C 842stretch
C=O stretch 1630 (1614)
Ca+(Acetone) sym C-C-C 831stretch
C=O stretch 1686 (1669)
* Results of B3LYP/6-311+G** calculations
1600 1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740
cm-1
13C Substituted Acetone
Mg+-(acetone)-Ar
1653
1678
Natural Acetone
1634
1667
A Final Verification
The spectrum of Mg+ complex with 13C isotopically substituted at the carbonyl carbon is acquired.
The doublet appears but is red-shifted further and the relative intensities are changed.
This behavior is consistent with a Fermi resonance.
Conclusions
IR spectroscopy of M+(Acetone) (M=Mg+, Al+, Ca+) in the C=O stretch region reveals structures of these complexes.
The C=O stretch shifts to lower frequencies due to M+ binding and can be explained electron density withdrawing mechanism of the bonding.
The greatest shift is for the Al+ complex as the cation has the largest charge density.
A Fermi resonance between the C=O stretch and the symmetric C-C-C vibration occurs for Mg+ and Ca+ but not Al+.
LaserVision™
Power varies with wavelength (15mJ-1mJ/pulse)
Linewidth ~0.3 cm-1
Infrared Optical Parametric Oscillator/Amplifier (IR OPO/OPA)
OPO OPA
2 crystalsangle+grating tuned
4 crystalsangle tuned
signal (not used)
idler (1.4-2.1 µm)
532 nm
1064 nm
Tuning range2000-4500 cm-1
KTPoscillator
KTAdiff. gen.