Investigation on Feature Guided WavesInvestigation on Feature Guided Waves David Fan, Mike Lowe...
Transcript of Investigation on Feature Guided WavesInvestigation on Feature Guided Waves David Fan, Mike Lowe...
Investigation on Feature Guided Waves
David Fan, Mike Lowe
Non-Destructive Testing Group
David Fan, Mike Lowe
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Imperial College London
SW7 2AZ
United Kingdom
1/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
Motivation
• Large area inspection by guided wave
2/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
Discovery of feature guiding
• Inspection of plate with weld
Weld guided waveWeld guided wave
J S t (BAE t ) 2006
3/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
J.Sargent (BAE systems), 2006
Finite element modelling
Semi-Analytical Finite Element (SAFE) method:
3x2x 12 mm
1x
Ab bi iAb bi i S l PlSt l Pl t W ld
2 mm
6 mm
Absorbing regionAbsorbing region Steel PlateSteel Plate Weld
400 mm800 mm 800 mm
4/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
SAFE results – compression mode
6000Phase velocity 150 kHz
m/s Weld guided mode
6mm plate S0
10 l t S0
loci
ty in
m
SH0 in a steel plate
Weld guided mode10mm plate S0200 kHz
Phas
e ve
l
Leaky Non-300 kHLeaky
leaky 300 kHz
50 150 250 350 4500
Frequency in kHz
5/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
Discovery of a new mode – shear mode
3500Phase velocity
100 kHz3500
m/s
100 kHz
ocity
in m
SH0 in a steel plate 150 kHz
Phas
e ve
lo
Weld guided mode
P
250 kHz
50 100 150 200 2503000
Frequency in kHzFan & Lowe
Proc. R. Soc. A, 2009
6/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
,
Why the waves are trapped?
3x2x
1x
Weld Pl t
1
Weld Plate
SAFE method Analytical method
7/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
Why the waves are trapped?
L dPh l it
• Condition 1: Similar mode shape Weld cap Plate
S0 dL mode6000
Phase velocity
Longitudinal mode
S0 mode
F mode 1in m
/s
SH0 mode
velo
city
i
Flexural mode 1
Torsional modeSH0 mode
Phas
e
Flexural mode 2F mode 2 A0 mode
250500
F i kH
8/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
25050 Frequency in kHz
Why the waves are trapped?
• Condition 2: Lower velocity in the weld
plate(faster) weld
(slower)
9/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
Why the waves are trapped?
• Condition 2: Lower velocity in the weldT d d
6000Phase velocity
S0 L mode
Trapped modes:
S0 mode
n m
/s
Longitudinal mode
velo
city
in
F mode 1
Torsional mode SH0
F mode 1 SH0 mode
Phas
e v F mode 1
F mode 2
A0
0 Exciting mode for inspection
10/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
25050 Frequency in kHzc t g ode o spect o
Typical results from FE (crack parallel to the weld)( p )
Absorbing regionMonitor 1
Monitor 2
11/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
Defect scattering study
Laser interferometer
Monitor
Shear transducer
12/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
Typical results from Experiment
30mm slot parallel to the weld
0.14
30mm slot parallel to the weld
0.1
0.12
oeffi
cien
t
0.06
0.08
ectio
n C
o40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1400.02
0.04Ref
l40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Frequency (kHz)
13/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
Discussion - crack parallel to the weld
Different length of the crack:
ent
30 mm24 mm16 mm
0.12
0.14SH0 wave interaction with axial crack on a plate
n C
oeffi
cie
0.08
0.1
Ref
lect
io
0 04
0.06
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.30.02
0.04
Length of crack to wavelength ratio
14/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
Discussion - crack parallel to the weld
FE results Experimental results
0.12
0.14
cien
t 0.12
0.1430 mm24 mm16 mm
0.08
0.1
ion
Coe
ffic
0.08
0.1
0.04
0.06
Ref
lect
i
0.04
0.06
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.30.02
0.04
L h f k l h i
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.30.02
0.04
L h f k l h iLength of crack to wavelength ratio Length of crack to wavelength ratio
Possible reason: difference between the milled slot (experiment) and the FE crack
15/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
milled slot (experiment) and the FE crack
Discussion - crack normal to the weld
E i l l
0.24
0.26
t 0 35
0.4FE results Experimental results
0 18
0.2
0.2240 mm
Coe
ffici
ent
30 mm0.3
0.35
40 mm
0.14
0.16
0.18
20 mm
Ref
lect
ion
C
0 2
0.25
20 mm
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1400.1
0.12
R
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
0.2 20 mm
Frequency (kHz) Frequency (kHz)
Possible reason: un-uniform of the weld geometry
16/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
the weld geometry
Discussion: Flat-bottom hole
Different depth of the hole:
0.2
0 12
0.14100%
FE results Experimental results
0.16
coef
ficie
nt
0.1
0.12
84 %
0 08
0.12
Ref
lect
ion
c
0.06
0.08
49 %
65 %
0.04
0.08R
0.02
0.04
17 %
33 %
0.3 0.40.2
Length of diameter to wavelength ratio0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4
0
Length of diameter to wavelength ratio
17/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory
Summary
The feature guided wave has been studied by the SAFE h d B h h i d d hSAFE method. Both the compression mode and the shear mode have been investigated and compared.
The reason for the trapping effect has been di d d i ddiscussed and summarized.
Experiments have been taken to validate the existence of the trapping mode and its sensitivity to certain defects
18/18Feature Guided Wave NDT Laboratory