Intracoronary Eptifibatide Bolus Administration During Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization for...
-
Upload
nathaniel-lewis -
Category
Documents
-
view
237 -
download
0
Transcript of Intracoronary Eptifibatide Bolus Administration During Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization for...
Intracoronary Eptifibatide Bolus Intracoronary Eptifibatide Bolus Administration During Percutaneous Administration During Percutaneous
Coronary Revascularization for Acute Coronary Revascularization for Acute Coronary Syndromes With Evaluation of Coronary Syndromes With Evaluation of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Occupancy and Platelet Function. The Occupancy and Platelet Function. The Intracoronary Eptifibatide (ICE) TrialIntracoronary Eptifibatide (ICE) Trial
Albert J. Deibele MD, Lisa K. Jennings PhD, Albert J. Deibele MD, Lisa K. Jennings PhD, James E. Tcheng MD, Cathy Neva RN, James E. Tcheng MD, Cathy Neva RN,
Angela D. Earhart BS, C. Michael Gibson MS, MDAngela D. Earhart BS, C. Michael Gibson MS, MD
BackgroundBackgroundDistal embolization of thrombotic debris occurs Distal embolization of thrombotic debris occurs during PCI for acute coronary syndromesduring PCI for acute coronary syndromesImpaired microvascular perfusion, myonecrosis Impaired microvascular perfusion, myonecrosis and increased mortality may resultand increased mortality may resultGlycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have improved Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have improved outcomes during PCI for acute coronary outcomes during PCI for acute coronary syndromes by reducing major adverse cardiac syndromes by reducing major adverse cardiac eventseventsIn VitroIn Vitro studies suggest that very high local studies suggest that very high local concentrations of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are concentrations of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are effective in disaggregating thrombuseffective in disaggregating thrombus
Higher levels of GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy Higher levels of GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy has led to improved myocardial perfusion in has led to improved myocardial perfusion in myocardial infarctionmyocardial infarction
Intracoronary administration of eptifibatide may Intracoronary administration of eptifibatide may result in higher local concentrationresult in higher local concentration
High local concentration of eptifibatide may lead High local concentration of eptifibatide may lead to increased GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy to increased GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy thereby promoting thrombus disaggregation and thereby promoting thrombus disaggregation and improved myocardial perfusion improved myocardial perfusion
Background (cont.)Background (cont.)
Intracoronary (IC) administration of Intracoronary (IC) administration of eptifibatide will result in higher local levels of eptifibatide will result in higher local levels of platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Occupancy (RO), reduced thrombus burden Occupancy (RO), reduced thrombus burden and improved measures of coronary flow and improved measures of coronary flow than intravenous (IV) administration during than intravenous (IV) administration during PCI for acute coronary syndromes.PCI for acute coronary syndromes.
HypothesisHypothesis
Non ST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionNon ST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionUnstable Angina with either ST segment shifts, Unstable Angina with either ST segment shifts, elevated biomarkers or visible thrombuselevated biomarkers or visible thrombusST Elevation Myocardial Infarction > 24 hours ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction > 24 hours from treatment with thrombolyticsfrom treatment with thrombolyticsStenosis > 70% by visual estimateStenosis > 70% by visual estimateLesion suitable for coronary stentLesion suitable for coronary stentInformed consentInformed consentAge > 18 years oldAge > 18 years old Negative pregnancy test for women of child Negative pregnancy test for women of child bearing potentialbearing potential
Inclusion CriteriaInclusion Criteria
Planned PCI within 30 days of index PCIPlanned PCI within 30 days of index PCISevere coronary calcificationSevere coronary calcificationAcute ST elevation Myocardial InfarctionAcute ST elevation Myocardial InfarctionOccluded target vesselOccluded target vesselSVG as the target vesselSVG as the target vesselLeft main stenosis > 50%Left main stenosis > 50%INR > 1.4INR > 1.4Previous stent at the target lesionPrevious stent at the target lesionContraindication to GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor therapyContraindication to GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor therapyDVTDVTPresence of an IVC FilterPresence of an IVC Filter
Exclusion CriteriaExclusion Criteria
43 patients with acute coronary syndromes 43 patients with acute coronary syndromes randomized to IC vs IV bolus of eptifibatide randomized to IC vs IV bolus of eptifibatide during coronary stentingduring coronary stenting2 boluses of 180 mcg/Kg of eptifibatide 2 boluses of 180 mcg/Kg of eptifibatide administered over 2 minutesadministered over 2 minutesSecond bolus administered 10 minutes after the Second bolus administered 10 minutes after the initial bolusinitial bolusA continuous infusion of eptifibatide 2 A continuous infusion of eptifibatide 2 mcg/Kg/min started with the initial bolusmcg/Kg/min started with the initial bolusIC eptifibatide buffered to pH 7.0-7.4 with 2 cc IC eptifibatide buffered to pH 7.0-7.4 with 2 cc 8% sodium bicarbonate8% sodium bicarbonate
MethodsMethods
2 boluses of eptifibatide either administered IC over 2 boluses of eptifibatide either administered IC over 2 minutes via guide catheter or over 2 minutes via 2 minutes via guide catheter or over 2 minutes via peripheral IVperipheral IVA Castillo catheter seated in the coronary sinusA Castillo catheter seated in the coronary sinusCoronary sinus samples obtained for GP IIb/IIIa RO Coronary sinus samples obtained for GP IIb/IIIa RO during the bolus of eptifibatide – IC at 30 secs and during the bolus of eptifibatide – IC at 30 secs and IV at 60 secsIV at 60 secsPeripheral samples obtained for GP IIb/IIIa RO Peripheral samples obtained for GP IIb/IIIa RO immediately after the CS sample during the bolusimmediately after the CS sample during the bolusPeripheral studies of the inhibition of platelet Peripheral studies of the inhibition of platelet aggregation obtained at time 0, 15, 30 and 60 aggregation obtained at time 0, 15, 30 and 60 minutesminutesPCI performed after both boluses of eptifibatide PCI performed after both boluses of eptifibatide were administeredwere administered
Methods (cont.)Methods (cont.)
TTaabbllee 11.. BBaasseelliinnee CChhaarraacctteerriissttiiccss IICC ((NN==2222)) IIVV ((NN==1199)) pp--vvaalluuee
AAggee** 5599..99 ++ 1111..88 5588..55 ++ 1133..33 00..773344
MMaallee†† 1144 ((6633..66)) 1144 ((7733..77)) 00..449911
WWeeiigghhtt** 8877..44 ++ 2211..33 9911..33 ++ 1199..44 00..554444
CCuurrrreenntt SSmmookkeerr†† 77 ((3311..88)) 99 ((4477..44)) 00..330099
DDiiaabbeetteess MMeelllliittuuss‡‡ 33 ((1133..66)) 55 ((2266..33)) 00..443366
HHyyppeerrtteennssiioonn†† 1144 ((6633..66)) 99 ((4477..44)) 00..229955
HHyyppeerrlliippiiddeemmiiaa†† 1155 ((6688..22)) 1100 ((5522..66)) 00..330099
CCaarrddiiaacc CCaatthheetteerriizzaattiioonn IInnddiiccaattiioonn†† 00..220033
UUnnssttaabbllee AAnnggiinnaa 1100 ((4455..55)) 44 ((2211..11))
NNoonn--SSTT EElleevvaattiioonn MMII 88 ((3366..44)) 88 ((4422..11))
SSTT EElleevvaattiioonn MMII 44 ((1188..22)) 77 ((3366..88))
** -- MMeeaann ++ SSDD:: ssttuuddeenntt’’ss tt--tteesstt ((22--ssiiddeedd)) †† -- nn ((%%)):: PPeeaarrssoonn’’ss cchhii--ssqquuaarree tteesstt ‡‡ -- nn ((%%)):: FFiisshheerr’’ss eexxaacctt tteesstt ((22--ssiiddeedd))
RESULTSRESULTS
No adverse events occurred during IC No adverse events occurred during IC administration of eptifibatideadministration of eptifibatide
No arrhythmias occurred.No arrhythmias occurred.
No occurrences of pericardial effusion, No occurrences of pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade or myocardial rupture.cardiac tamponade or myocardial rupture.
Figure 1. Peripheral % IPA with ADP
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Baseline 15 min post bolus 30 min post bolus 60 min post bolus*
%IP
A
IV Rx administration (n=19)IC Rx administration (n=22)
p = 0.670
* 21 IC Rx samples
Figure 2. Peripheral % IPA with TRAP
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Baseline 15 min post bolus 30 min post bolus 60 min post bolus*
%IP
A
IV Rx administration (n=13)IC Rx administration (n=17)
p = 0.124
* 17 IC Rx samples
Figure 3. % GP IIIb/IIIa RO by Collection Site and Bolus
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Bolus 1 Bolus 2 Bolus 1 Bolus 2
% R
O
IV Rx administration (n=19)
IC Rx administration (n=21)
Peripheral Blood Collection Coronary Sinus Blood Collection
p = 0.013 p = 0.995 p < 0.001 p = 0.001
Figure 4. % GP IIIb/IIIa RO by Type of Administration and Bolus (Paired samples)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Bolus 1 Bolus 2 Bolus 1 Bolus 2
% R
O
Peripheral Coronary Sinus
IV RX Administration (n = 19) IC RX Administration (n = 21)
p = 0.003 p = 0.029 p < 0.001 p < 0.001
Figure 5. Five-number Summary: Corrected TIMI Frame Count (cTFC) with Mann-Whitney Test
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
IV (n = 18; mean rank = 19.1) IC (n = 20; mean rank = 19.8) IV (n = 18; mean rank = 24.6) IC (n = 20; mean rank = 14.9)
cT
FC
(3
0 F
r/S
ec
)
Pre-PCI: U = 173.5; Z = -0.19 p = 0.849 Post-PCI: U = 87.5; Z = -2.71 p = 0.007
Figure 6. Post-PCI TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade
1111
710
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
IV Rx administration (n=18) IC Rx administration (n=21)
% P
ati
en
ts
TMPG 2/3
TMPG 0/1
p = 0.58
TTaabbllee 22 AAnnggiiooggrraapphhiicc aanndd CClliinniiccaall OOuuttccoommeess
IICC ((NN==2222)) IIVV ((NN==1199)) pp--vvaalluuee AAnnggiiooggrraapphhiicc DDaattaa
CCuullpprriitt VVeesssseell†† 00..553333
LLeefftt MMaaiinn 11 ((44..55)) 00 ((00..00))
LLeefftt AAnntteerriioorr DDeesscceennddiinngg 1100 ((4455..55)) 66 ((3311..66))
LLeefftt CCiirrccuummfflleexx 44 ((1188..22)) 66 ((3311..66))
RRiigghhtt CCoorroonnaarryy 77 ((3311..88)) 77 ((3366..88))
PPrreesseennccee ooff VViissiibbllee TThhrroommbbuuss†† 66 ((2277..33)) 77 ((3366..88)) 00..551111 ((YYeess//PPoossssiibbllee))
PPrree--PPCCII SStteennoossiiss ((%%))** 8899..44 ++ 1111..00 9911..11 ++ 66..11 00..555533
PPrree--PPCCII TTIIMMII FFllooww GGrraaddee†† 00..558822
00..00 11 ((44..55)) 00 ((00..00))
22..00 22 ((99..11)) 11 ((55..66))
22..55 33 ((1133..66)) 11 ((55..66))
33..00 1166 ((7722..77)) 1166 ((8888..99))
PPoosstt--PPCCII TTIIMMII FFllooww GGrraaddee‡‡ 00..446622
22..55 00 ((00..00)) 11 ((55..66))
33..00 2211 ((110000..00)) 1177 ((9944..44))
CClliinniiccaall DDaattaa
PPrroocceedduurree RReellaatteedd MMII‡‡ 11 ((44..55)) 33 ((1155..88)) 00..332211
BBlleeeeddiinngg
MMiinnoorr EEvveenntt†† 00 ((00..00)) 00 ((00..00)) ------------
MMaajjoorr EEvveenntt†† 00 ((00..00)) 00 ((00..00)) ------------
AArrrrhhyytthhmmiiaa‡‡ 00 ((00..00)) 22 ((1100..55)) 00..220099
DDeeaatthh†† 00 ((00..00)) 00 ((00..00)) ------------
3300 DDaayy FFoollllooww--uupp
DDeeaatthh†† 00 ((00..00)) 00 ((00..00)) ------------
RReeiinnffaarrccttiioonn†† 00 ((00..00)) 00 ((00..00)) ------------
UUrrggeenntt RReevvaassccuullaarriizzaattiioonn‡‡ 11 ((44..55)) 00 ((00..00)) 11..0000
** -- MMeeaann ++ SSDD:: ssttuuddeenntt’’ss tt--tteesstt ((22--ssiiddeedd)) †† -- nn ((%%)):: PPeeaarrssoonn’’ss cchhii--ssqquuaarree tteesstt ‡‡ -- nn ((%%)):: FFiisshheerr’’ss eexxaacctt tteesstt ((22--ssiiddeedd))
IC vs IV administration of eptifibatide results in IC vs IV administration of eptifibatide results in similar levels of systemic inhibition of platelet similar levels of systemic inhibition of platelet aggregation.aggregation.
IC administration of eptifibatide results in higher IC administration of eptifibatide results in higher local levels of GP IIb/IIIa RO.local levels of GP IIb/IIIa RO.
IC treatment with eptifibatide was associated with IC treatment with eptifibatide was associated with improved coronary flow and microvascular improved coronary flow and microvascular perfusion by an improved cTFC.perfusion by an improved cTFC.
ConclusionsConclusions
High first bolus GP IIb/IIIa RO in the coronary High first bolus GP IIb/IIIa RO in the coronary sinus was the only factor in a multivariate analysis sinus was the only factor in a multivariate analysis associated with an improved cTFC.associated with an improved cTFC.
Further prospective, randomized studies to Further prospective, randomized studies to explore the angiographic and clinical efficacy of explore the angiographic and clinical efficacy of this strategy are warranted.this strategy are warranted.
Conclusions (cont.)Conclusions (cont.)
This study was supported by a grant from the This study was supported by a grant from the SMDC Foundation and the University of SMDC Foundation and the University of
Tennessee Vascular Biology Center of ExcellenceTennessee Vascular Biology Center of Excellence
SMDC Research StaffSMDC Research Staff
Jennifer GundersonJennifer Gunderson
Christine LeoneChristine Leone
Lezlie SwansonLezlie Swanson
Colleen RenierColleen Renier
Jeanette PalcherJeanette Palcher
University of TennesseeUniversity of Tennessee
Mary JacoskiMary Jacoski
Angela EarhartAngela Earhart
Melanie WhiteMelanie White