Into to OB
-
Upload
shashankkapur22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Into to OB
-
8/14/2019 Into to OB
1/4
What is an organization?
An organization is a consciously coordinatedsocial entity, with a relatively
identifiable boundary, that functions on a relatively continuous basis to achieve a
common goal or a set of goals. (S.P. Robbins, 1990)
Images of Organization (Morgan , 2006)
As machines
As organisms
As brains
As cultures
As political systems
As psychic prisons
As flux and transformation
As instruments of domination
Some important milestones in development of OB as a specialized field of
study
Adam Smiths Division of Labour (1776):
Great increase of the quantity of work, owing to:
1. Increase in dexterity in every particular workman
2. Saving of the time commonly lost in passing from one species of work to other
3. Invention of a great number of machines which facilitate and abridge labour
Frederick Taylors Principles of Scientific Management (1911)
Replacement of rule of thumb methods with scientific measurement
Scientific selection and training of workers
Cooperation of management and labor to accomplish work objectives
More equal division of responsibility between managers and workers
Henri Fayols Principles of Organization (1916)
Division of work
-
8/14/2019 Into to OB
2/4
Authority
Discipline
Unity of command
Unity of direction
Subordination of individual interests to general interests
Remuneration
Centralization
Scalar Chain
Order
Equity
Stability of tenure of personnel
Initiative
Espirit de corps
Max Webers Bureaucracy (1946)
Six key elements:
Specialization
Hierarchy of offices Rules and regulations
Technical competence
Impersonality
Formal, written communications
Douglas McGregors Theory X- Theory Y (1960)
Theory X-
1. Employees inherently dislike work and, whenever possible, attempt to avoid it
2. Employees must be coerced, controlled, or threatened with punishment to achieve
desired goals
-
8/14/2019 Into to OB
3/4
3. Employees will shirk responsibilities and seek formal direction whenever possible
4. Most workers place security above all other factors associated with work and will
display little ambition
Theory Y-
1. Employees can view work as being as natural as rest or play
2. Human beings will exercise self-direction and self-control if they are committed to the
objectives
3. The average person can learn to accept, even seek, responsibility
4. Creativity, i.e. the ability to make good decisions-is widely dispersed throughout the
population and is not necessarily the sole province of managers
The Hawthorne Studies
Individual behaviors may be altered because they know they are being studied was
demonstrated in a research project (1927 - 1932) of the Hawthorne Plant of the Western Electric
Company in Cicero, Illinois. This series of research, first led by Harvard Business School professo
Elton Mayo along with associates F.J. Roethlisberger and William J. Dickson started out byexamining the physical and environmental influences of the workplace (e.g. brightness of lights
humidity) and later, moved into the psychological aspects (e.g. breaks, group pressure, working
hours, managerial leadership). The ideas that this team developed about the social dynamics of
groups in the work setting had lasting influence - the collection of data, labor-managemen
relations, and informal interaction among factory employees.
The major finding of the study was that almost regardless of the experimental manipulation
employed, the production of the workers seemed to improve. One reasonable conclusion is that
the workers were pleased to receive attention from the researchers who expressed an interest in
them. The study was only expected to last one year, but because the researchers were set back
each time they tried to relate the manipulated physical conditions to the worker's efficiency, theproject extended out to five years.
Four general conclusions were drawn from the Hawthorne studies:
The aptitudes of individuals are imperfect predictors of job performance. Although they give
some indication of the physical and mental potential of the individual, the amount produced is
strongly influenced by social factors.
Informal organization affects productivity. The Hawthorne researchers discovered a group life
among the workers. The studies also showed that the relations that supervisors develop with
workers tend to influence the manner in which the workers carry out directives.
Work-group norms affect productivity. The Hawthorne researchers were not the first to
recognize that work groups tend to arrive at norms of what is "a fair day's work," however,
they provided the best systematic description and interpretation of this phenomenon.
The workplace is a social system. The Hawthorne researchers came to view the workplace as a
social system made up of interdependent parts.
For decades, the Hawthorne studies provided the rationale for human relations within the
organization. Then two researchers used a new procedure called "time-series analyses." Using
-
8/14/2019 Into to OB
4/4
the original variables and including in the Great Depression and the instance of a manageria
discipline in which two insubordinate and mediocre workers were replaced by two differen
productive workers (one who took the role of straw boss - see below). They discovered that
production was most affected by the replacement of the two workers due to their greate
productivity and the affect of the disciplinary action on the other workers. The occurrence of the
Depression also encouraged job productivity, perhaps through the increased importance of jobs
and the fear of losing them. Rest periods and a group incentive plan also had a somewhat
positive smaller effect on productivity. These variables accounted for almost all the variation in
productivity during the experimental period. Social science may have been to readily to embrace
the original Hawthorne interpretations since it was looking for theories or work motivation tha
were more humane and democratic. Franke, R.H. & Kaul, J.D. "The Hawthorne experiments: Firs
statistical interpretation." American Sociological Review, 1978, 43, 623-643
(Source: http://www.nwlink.com/~Donclark/hrd/history/hawthorne.html)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
http://www.nwlink.com/~Donclark/hrd/history/hawthorne.htmlhttp://www.nwlink.com/~Donclark/hrd/history/hawthorne.htmlhttp://www.nwlink.com/~Donclark/hrd/history/hawthorne.htmlhttp://www.nwlink.com/~Donclark/hrd/history/hawthorne.html