Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have...

31
8/19/17 1 Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat” Sco: Bradner 8/3/2016 1 Preview 2 No one governs “The Internet” Some in-country regulaKons And that does not make any sense (to governments, to carriers, to the ITU) “The Internet” internaKonal, interconnected data networks

Transcript of Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have...

Page 1: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

1

InternetGovernance:Aperpetual“threat”

Sco:Bradner8/3/2016

1

Preview

2

Noonegoverns“TheInternet”Somein-countryregulaKons

Andthatdoesnotmakeanysense(togovernments,tocarriers,totheITU)

“TheInternet”–internaKonal,interconnecteddatanetworks

Page 2: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

2

History&StateofTelecomGovernance

Itallstartedwiththetelegraph

3

LongDistanceCommunicaKon–P1

4

WHATHATHGODWROUGHT

1793 1844 1858

By1875:650,000miletelegraphnetworkInterconnecKng20,000towns&ciKes-world-wide

Page 3: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

3

TelegraphSystemArchitectureState-ownedorstate-licensedprovidersconfinedtoastate(country)

ApprovedservicesRevenuesourceforstateBilateralcross-borderinterconnectagreements

5

TelegraphRegulaKons1865:20EuropeangovernmentsgatheredinParis

InternaKonalTelegraphConference->Interna'onalTelegraphConven'on(ITC)->

InternaKonalTelegraphUnion(ITU) 6

Europein1865

Page 4: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

4

ITC1865Tariffs&se:lementsTechnicalstandards(almostnone)RetenKonrequirementComplaintprocess...

RequirementsincludedprotecKngstate&morality

Requirementforoperatortobeabletostopmessagesthat“mayappeardangeroustothesafetyoftheStateorwhichwouldbecontrarytothelawsofthecountry,publicorderormorality” 7

CommunicaKonsGovernanceV1Governancebygovernments

EmpoweredstateregulatorsMorethanjusttechnology

Alsoprotectstate,money&moralityInterconnecKonunderITCrulesWestphalianideal?

8

Page 5: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

5

ITU1934:InternaKonalTelegraphUnion->

InternaKonalTelecommunicaKonUnion

9

1865 1885 1906 1934 1949

becauseITU“coveredallformsofwirelineandwirelesscommunica'on”

TelephoneSystemUnKl1980sState-ownedorstate-licensedproviders

Confinedtoastate

SignificantrevenuesourceforstatesDecadelongplanningcyclesCircuit-based“intelligentnetwork”ServicesprovidedbycarrierApprovedservicesQoS&security“guaranteed”bydesignInterconnecKonunderITUrules 10

Page 6: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

6

RegulaKonEvolvedBecauseLocalMonopolies–needtoprotectconsumerTariffs–moneyflowacrossinterconnecKonsQuality–assumpKonofrequiredminimumqualityInterconnecKon–morethantechnicalissuesNumbering(naming)–poliKcalforcountrydeterminaKon

...i.e.,regulaKonwasneeded!

11

TheTelecomRegulatorsInternaKonal:InternaKonalTelecommunicaKonsUnion(ITU)Ofgovernments,bygovernments,forgovernmentsProducesrecommendaKons(standards)

Technical,economic,operaKons,lawenforcement

U.S.:FederalCommunicaKonsCommission(FCC)OftheU.S.government,…ProducesregulaKons

Technical,economic,operaKons,lawenforcement

Governments(ofcourse)representconsKtuentsButwhoaretheconsKtuents?(theincumbents?) 12

Page 7: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

7

TheInternet

13

TheInternetStarted(forreal)1Jan1983Packet-basedstupidnetworkOverlayontopofexisKng(e.g.,telephone)networksUses“besteffort”delivery(noguarantees)Technology:end-to-end

Servicesnotcontrolledbycarriers

Longignoredbyincumbentcarriers&regulatorsEventhoughcarriersusedtechnologythemselves

14

Page 8: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

8

InternetArchitectureInterconnectedindependentnetworksPair-wiseinterconnecKondecisions

NocentralplanningorinterconnecKonregulaKonsNocentralcontrol&li:lecoordinaKonarerequired

ProtocolparametersFieldsinprotocolsthatneedtobeinsync

BulkIPaddressassignmentsActualassignments&assignmentpolicydoneregionally

MaintainDNSrootzonefileSetofpointerstoserversforTLDs(e.g..com,.company,.fr)

ISOmaintainscountrycodes(.fr,.us,.jp,…)DNSservicedistributed

AbovefuncKonsdonebyIANAInternetAssignedNumbersAuthority 15

InternetServiceAnyonecantalkwithanyoneAnyonecanofferanyservice

AslongasitrunsovertheInternetProtocolAslongasthestandardInternetserviceis“goodenough”forcustomers(notforregulators)

NopermissionsrequiredMighthavelocalfirewallissues,butthe‘Netwilltransportthepackets

NoapplicaKon-specificpaymentstoISPs

16

Page 9: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

9

InternetRegulaKonWhatInternetregulaKon?IntheU.S.,theFCCrefrained

SincetelephonecompaniesignoredtheInternet

Anoverlay,notanew,network“Experts”:doesnot/cannotworkInternetuselessinthe“realworld”

17

InternetRegulaKonNotNeededNoLocalMonopolies(usedtobethecase)TariffregulaKonsavoidedbycompeKKonQuality–noassumpKonofminimumrequiredquality

InterconnecKon–bilateralpeeringarrangementsbetweenISPs

Numbering–justallocaKngintegers–nomeaningNaming–distributedcontrol–trademarkissuestakentocourt

18

Page 10: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

10

Internet:TheAnK-NetworkEverythingthatthetelephonenetworkwasnot

FlexibleInnovaKveEnablingGeneraKveDistributedauthorityMulKpleISPsingivenarea(mostly)internaKonallyseamless(mostly)unregulated/ungoverned

ExcepKonsinsomecountries–e.g.China,England,…

19

Thingschanged

20

Page 11: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

11

TheInternetbecameITToobigtoignore(ordisbelieve)TheInternetismorethan5%oftheworld’sGDPReplacingallexisKngcommunicaKoninfrastructuresFarcheapertobuild&operateScaresthebejesusoutofmostgovernments

e.g.ISISrecruiKngviaslicksocialmediaprogramsScaresthebejesusoutofmosttradiKonalindustriesJustaskthenewspaperpublishers

21

InternetStandardsNostandardsforinterconnecKonoperaKons

Pair-wiseISPagreements

NostandardsforbillingPair-wiseISPagreements

Nostandardsforse:lementsPair-wiseISPagreements

VoluntarytechnicalstandardsfromIETF&W3CSelforganized–nospecificgovernmentrole

Ad-hoctechnicalstandardsfromvendors

22

Page 12: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

12

Isthistheanswer?

23Note:L2≠L3

InternetGovernanceCasesIANAfuncKonITUNetworkneutrality

24

Page 13: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

13

IANAfuncKon

25

IANAfuncKonThe3InternetcoordinaKonfuncKonsareperformedbytheInternetAssignedNumbersAuthority(IANA)

RecordprotocolvaluesforIETFAllocateIPaddressblockstoregionalregistriesMaintainrootzonefileforthedomainnamesystem

TheIANAfuncKonisperformedbytheInternetCorporaKonforAssignedNamesandNumbers(ICANN)

ICANNestablishedin1998todotheIANAfuncKon

26

Page 14: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

14

WhitePaper10June’98:ManagementofInternetNamesandAddresses(63FR31741)

“StatementofPolicy”Internetstakeholdersareinvitedtoworktogethertoformanew,private,not-for-profitcorpora'ontomanageDNSfunc'ons1)setpolicyforanddirectalloca'onofIPnumberblockstoregionalInternetnumberregistries;2)overseeopera'onoftheauthorita'veInternetrootserversystem;3)overseepolicyfordeterminingthecircumstancesunderwhichnewTLDsareaddedtotherootsystem;and4)coordinatetheassignmentofotherInternettechnicalparametersasneededtomaintainuniversalconnec'vityontheInternet.thenewcorpora'oncouldbefundedbydomainnameregistries,regionalIPregistries,orotheren''esiden'fiedbytheBoard.

27

IANAContractICANNusedtobeundercontractfromtheU.S.NaKonalTelecommunicaKonsandInformaKonAdministraKon(NTIA)toperformIANAfuncKonNTIApartoftheDepartmentofCommerce

U.S.“control”oftheInternetlongresentedbymanyoutsidetheU.S.

28

Page 15: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

15

ICANN-NTIAContractTranslatedintoacKonitemsTheDoCsignsoffonanychangestotheDNSrootzonefilei.e.,thefilethatliststheTLDsandoftheIPaddressesofthenameserversforeachoftheTLDs

29

NTIAsays“maybe”Mar.2014,NTIAsaidtheymightsurrendercontrolifspecificcondiKonsweremet

MulKstakeholdermodel,maintainstabilityofDNS,meetneedsofIANAcustomers&maintainopenInternet

FightoverIANAfuncKonshowsassumpKonthattheInternetisgoverned(byICANN)

30

Page 16: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

16

IANAtransiKon,contd.ManyinCongressdidnotwantto“giveawaytheInternet”–e.g.,December2014budgetbill:

NoneofthefundsmadeavailablebythisAct,maybeusedtorelinquishtheresponsibilityoftheNa'onalTelecommunica'onsandInforma'onAdministra'onduringfiscalyear2015withrespecttoInternetdomainnamefunc'onfunc'ons,includingresponsibilitywithrespecttotheauthorita'verootzonefileandtheInternetAssignedNumbersAuthorityfunc'ons.

31

GivingAwaytheInternet!

32Cruz.Senate.gov

Page 17: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

17

CommunityPowersoverICANNRejectICANNBudgets,IANABudgetsorStrategic/Opera'ngPlans.RejectchangestoICANN’sStandardBylaws.ApprovechangestonewFundamentalBylaws,Ar'clesofIncorpora'onandCANN’ssaleorotherdisposi'onofallorsubstan'allyallofICANN’sassets.RemoveanindividualICANNBoardDirector.Recalltheen'reICANNBoard.Ini'ateabindingIndependentReviewProcess(whereapaneldecisionisenforceableinanycourtrecognizinginterna'onalarbitra'onresults).RejectICANNBoarddecisionsrela'ngtoreviewsoftheIANAfunc'ons,includingthetriggeringofPostTransi'onIANAsepara'on.Therightsofinspec'onandinves'ga'on

33

IANAtransiKonNTIA/IANAStewardshipTransiKonCoordinaKonGroupformedinresponsetoNTIAannouncement

ReviewedproposalsfromthethreecommuniKes(IETF,numbers&names)&producedacombinedone

Combinedproposalsubmi:edtoNTIANTIAsaidproposalmetrequirementsNTIAletcontractexpireon1October2016ICANNisnowonitsown

Note:ifthetransiKonhadnothappened–forcesintheUNwouldlikelyhavevotedtotakeICANNover

34

Page 18: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

18

ITU

35

ITU

TheInternaKonalTelecommunicaKonsUnionU.N.treatyorganizaKonthetradiKonalhomeoftelecommunicaKonsstandards

Originallyformedinmid1800sStandardsvotedonby“memberstates”ImposedbyregulaKoninsomecountriesFewITUstandardsarerelevanttotheInternet

Notbecausetheyhavenottried(orclaim)H.323(voiceoverIP),NextGeneraKonNetwork(NGN)

36

Page 19: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

19

ITUgovernanceEverynow&then–meettoreviewtreaKes

WorldConferenceonInternaKonalTelecommunicaKons(WCIT)–2012,previousin1988

Every4yearsPlenipotenKaryConference(PP)–next:2018

SetoverallITUplanfornext4yearsWorldTelecommunicaKonStandardizaKonAssembly(WTSA)–last:Oct.2016

SetITU-Tstructureandplanfornext4years

Onlygovernments“intheroom”ContribuKondriven

Thusnotalwayscontrolled37

ITU&InternetTheITUhaslongrecognizedthattheInternetwasintrudingontheirtradiKonalterritorye.g.,shortlybeforePP-98(1998)

IETFwasapproachedaboutsubmitngIETFstandardstoITU-Tforreview

EveryPPsincehaveincludedproposalstotakeoversomeoralloftheInternetstandardsorassignmentfuncKons

Todate,allblocked,mostlybyU.S.coordinatedeffortsButsomeITU-TcontribuKonsrequestthisanyway

38

Page 20: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

20

WhyCare?ITUactslikeavoteofthememberstatesempowersit

EvenovernongovernmentenKKessuchastheIETF,W3C,RIRs&ICANNAmbiguouslegalpictureinmanycountries

RevisionofInternetse:lementregulaKonscouldhavesignificantimpactonInternetbusinessmodelPutngInternetstandardsundergovernmentcontrolcouldchangenatureofthestandards

Protectincumbents,requirebackdoors,etc.

39

WCIT2012Promise:consensus,novoKngActual:votetoexpandITUroleinInternet

40CountrieswhodidnotsignresulKngtreatyinred

Page 21: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

21

PP2014ManysubmissionsE.g.,fromIndia

redoaddressing&namingtobecountrybasedtakeoverInternetaddress&namepolicydevelopmentredoarchitecturetoensureinternaltrafficstaysin-countryrecordallInternettransacKonsdevelopnew“secure,robustandtamper-proofprotocols”

Intheend,notadoptedAveralotofwork(U.S.opinionlessofafactor)

41

ITUFeatureTaiwandoesnotexistThereisnotelephonecountrycodeassignedforTaiwan

42

Page 22: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

22

ITUwillbeback,andbackTheITUmembershipwillconKnuetowanttogettheITUinvolvedinInternetgovernanceTechnicalstandardsandmore

Thepost-SnowdenUShaslessmoralauthoritytoblocksuchproposals–anongoingthreat

43

NetworkNeutrality

44

Page 23: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

23

OverridingIssueTheInternetisreplacingallexisKngtelecommunicaKonstechnologies

ExisKngtechnology-specificregulaKonsOBESomeregulaKonsfollowusee.g.,FCCdidrequireISPstobeabletowiretap

45

RegulatoryapproachesOpenists

Netmustbeopentoenableinnova'oncommonsRequirenetworkneutrality

e.g.,powergriddoesnotfavortoasters

Toletpeopleatedge/endinnovateDumbpipemustbeavailable&costeffecKve

DeregulaKonistsIf‘networkisproperty’carrierswillinnovate

Note:“property”specificallyincludesrighttoexcludeNetworkownerneedsincenKvetoinvestMandatorysmartpipeOK

46

The Broadband Debate: A User's Guide - Tim Wu http://ssrn.com/abstract=557330

Page 24: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

24

CarrierpointofviewIt’smywire,I’lldowhatIwantwithit

EdwardE.Whitacre-CEOAT&T‘Google,Vonage&Skypeareusingmynetworkforfree’

WilliamL.Smith-CTOBellSouth‘WeshouldbeabletochargeYahootolettheirwebpage

loadfasterthanGoogle.’IgnorefactthatthecustomerboughttheserviceinordertoaccessGoogle,etc.AndserviceismorevaluablebecauseofGoogle&etc.

Pushingtochargesitesfor“be:erservice”Smallsteptomakingpaymentrequiredforanyusefultransport(i.e.,aprotecKonracket)

47

NetworkNeutralityAneutralnetworkisinthespiritoftheoriginalInternetend-to-endarchitecture

ISPsjusttransportpacketswithoutregardtowhosentthem,whoistoreceivethem,orwhatisinthem

Enables“permissionlessinnovaKon”ButtheconceptisforeigntotradiKonalcarriersgrowingissueinU.S.&elsewhere

48

Page 25: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

25

InformaKonServicesTelecommunicaKonsActof1996createdaclassof“informaKonservices”

NotsubjecttoFCCregulaKonFCCusedtosaythatISPswereoffering“informaKonservices”

ISPsweregenerallysmallandnotpartoftelephoneorcableprovidersattheKmeToday,almostallresidenKalInternetserviceisfromatelephoneorcableprovider

ISPsgenerallyrespectthee2eprincipleForcompanies,notresidenKalservice

49

E2eAbuseButsomeISPshaveabusede2e

BlockedVoIP(MadsonRiver),degradedBitTorrent(Comcast),degradedNexlix(Cogent),…

Andtheyallsaidtheywerenotdoinganything

So,callsforFCCtoregulatetostopsuchabuseWhotruststhecarrierstoactinthecustomer’sinterest?

FCChastriedmulKpleKmes,alwaysoverturnedincourt

Withgoodcause

50

Page 26: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

26

MoreNetworkNeutralityConcept:ISPsshouldtreatallInternettrafficequallyNotprocessingorchargingdifferentlybecauseofsomefactor

e.g.,abusinessrelaKonship

ButsomeISPswanttobeabletochargefor“be:er”serviceOnlyworksifnopaymentmeansworseservice

Ortoblock,orimpede,compeKngservices

51

CommonCarriageAnindividualorbusinessthatadverKsestothepublicthatitisavailableforhiretotransportpeopleorpropertyinexchangeforafee.

Acommoncarrierislegallyboundtocarryallpassengersorfreightaslongasthereisenoughspace,thefeeispaid,andnoreasonablegroundstorefusetodosoexist.AcommoncarrierthatunjusKfiablyrefusestocarryaparKcularpersonorcargomaybesuedfordamages.

52

West'sEncyclopediaofAmericanLaw,

Page 27: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

27

CommonCarriage,contd.Basicconcept:treatcustomersconsistently&fairly

StartedwithfreightcarriersExtendedtotelecommunicaKonsin1910

Mann–ElkinsAct

ClarifiedfortelecommunicaKonscarriersunderTitleIIoftheCommunicaKonsActof1934

TitleIIextendedtoInternetserviceprovidersbyFCCinFeb.2015

53

TitleIITitleIIisnotnetworkneutralityTitleIIgivestheFCCauthoritytorequireaneutral(ornon-neutral)network

TitleIIalsogivestheFCCtheauthoritytoregulateeverydetailofanISP&itsserviceofferings

FCCsaysitwill“forebear”onover700individualregulaKons

54

Page 28: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

28

ReacKonCarrierssuedtoblockreclassificaKonFCCupheldincourt-June2016NewFCCchairproposingtoreversereclassificaKonFCCaskedforcomments

Got>9millioncomments,mostlyagainstPosedtoignoremostcomments

CongressgetngintothemixHouseEnergy&CommerceCommi:eewantstoholdafaceoffbetweencompaniespro&anKTitleII

55

TitleIITitleIIisawfulButthecourtstoldtheFCCthatgoingtheTitleIIroutewastheonlylegalwaytoproceedUnlessCongressacted

TitleIIenablestheworstkindofinnovaKon-killingregulaKon

TheFCChassaidtheywouldnotusemostofthepowerButafutureFCCcould,orbeforcedbythecourtsto

56

Page 29: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

29

goingdarkTheFBIsaystheywantlawstorequirebackdoorsinallInternetapplicaKons

e.g.,tocounterApple’siOSandiMessagelocksTriedusingAllWritsAct(1798)toforcecompliance-failed

SotheycanwiretaporgetatcontentsNevermindthattheycannotshowanyexamplewherethiswouldhavemadeadifference“achildwilldie”(theysay)

Note:therealbadguysalreadyhavetheirowntoolsandareincentedtohide

57

GovernanceIssuesregulaKons,se:lements,technologystandards,peering,security,emergencyuse,espionage/monitoring,naKonalboundaries,a:ribuKon,societaldisrupKon,businessdisrupKon,trademark,copyright,operaKonofcriKcalinfrastructure,censorship,spam,have/havenotbalance,domainnames,resourceassignmentpolicies,governmentroles,networkneutrality,exchangepointmanagement,marketdynamics,subsidies,compeKKon,cybercrime,cyberwar,patents,idenKficaKon,a:ribuKon,…

58

Page 30: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

30

Governanceissues,contd.IncludeoriginalITCissues

Requirementforoperatortobeabletostopmessagesthat“mayappeardangeroustothesafetyoftheStateorwhichwouldbecontrarytothelawsofthecountry,publicorderormorality”

E.g.,U.S.CommunicaKonsDecencyAct(CDA)ProtectchildrenbytellingadultstheycannottalklikeadultsBlockedbycourtsMulKpletriesatnaKonalandstatelevel

CommoninothercountriesPS.Breakingnews:SteveBannonwantstoregulateGoogle,Facebook...like“uKliKes” 59

IdealistsSomeidealistssaytheInternetdoesnotneedgovernanceButsomeofthemalsoadmitthatregulaKonsmaysKllbeuseful:“anycompanythathandlesInternetdatagramsmaynotreadormodifythecontent,norinferintentormeaningforthepurposeofdecidingwhatdatagramstodeliverortonotdeliver”DavidReed

60

Page 31: Internet Governance: A perpetual “threat”Revision of Internet se:lement regulaons could have significant impact on Internet business model Pung Internet standards under government

8/19/17

31

ReviewNosignificantchangesintheInternetgovernancepicture(inaboutforever)ButwekeepgetngclosetothecliffofgovernmentcontroloftheInternet

AtleastadozenKmesinthelastdozenyears

Willthecliffisalwaysbethere?Likely

TheInternetisnowtooimportanttoleavetothepeoplewhoknowhowitactuallyworks

61

62

AdvancedInternet AdvancedInternetPreferred AdvancedInternetPremier

100Websites

150Websites

250Websites

FREE ShoppingSites

ViewWebsiteLineup ViewWebsiteLineup ViewWebsiteLineup

FOXNEWS

ImaginetheoldAT&TbringingyoutheInternet?