Internal vs External Recruitment
-
Upload
sarmad-ali -
Category
Documents
-
view
17 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Internal vs External Recruitment
Internal RecruitmentPromoting employees from within an
organization To fill upcoming positionsFirm doesn’t have to “reinvent wheel”
with internal employeesEmployee adapts faster a new position
External RecruitmentHR systematically search for new
employee poolInflow of new ideas and skillsNew practices that can be integrated into
organization’s best practicesIt also diversifies teams and creates a
balance
At companies large and smallTalent Hunt never endsTo cut costs and timeCompanies are now looking at what have
been previously over-looked…
Within the company itself
Vitality of External Recruitment is undeniable
Induces new bloodCreates a competitive environment Existing workforce put in more effortsBut, firms are now more inclined
towardsInternal Recruitment
Source: Journal of Labor Economics
Literature ReviewArticle 1: External Recruitment as an
Incentive Device by Kong‐Pin Chen
Article 2: External Recruitment VS Internal Recruitment by William Chan
A hunt for talent never endsCompanies seek employeesWho can give maximum benefits to firm Due to high costs and time consumptionFirms mostly recruit internally
Two choices for employerRecruitment is an economic contestOpening up external recruitment opens up
a competitionChances of internal employees to win
decreaseBecause of incoming new skills and talentCan be avoided by setting the prize of
incentive high
Firms recruit externally for special and superior skill sets
But, Internal Recruitment has its own reasons
1 Human Capital Accumulation2 Risk aversion of choosing a wrong
person
Even if reliability of external candidate is known
Firms prefer to recruit internallyIf the relative significance hiring
externally is not strong enoughFirms also use promotion as an incentive
device along with monetary rewards
How it helps Organization?
It ensures loyalty and commitmentCreates a completive environment Employees strive to win the prizeNew employee rejuvenates organizationOrganization better knows an existing
employee
Critical AnalysisInstable economy has forced to cut
budgets for attracting new employeesHiring externally costs 1.7 times more
than hiring internally40% to 60%eternal hires fails Compared to 25% failiure rate in internal
recruitment
Figures Source: Saratoga Institute
Another concern is to find someone who can fit-in
Because hiring a wrong person can have drastic consequences
It also costs so much and takes a lot of time to make a new person to adopt firm’s culture
ConclusionWe can conclude that…
Crunch economic situations andRequired flexibility of an employee
Organizations are more inclined towards hiring internally
Only when the need to fill in high-demanding position or require some significant talent they look outside the organization