Innovation Processes in Transition by Erkki Ormala Professor of Practice, Innovation Management...
-
Upload
felicity-may -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
4
Transcript of Innovation Processes in Transition by Erkki Ormala Professor of Practice, Innovation Management...
Innovation Processes in Transition
by Erkki Ormala
Professor of Practice, Innovation Management
Aalto University, Business School
What do we want to achieve?
• Build industrial ecosystems to gain leadership of the new emerging value domains
• Capture the critical knowledge assets to enhance value generation in the network economy
Innovation Management
• People are the most valuable assets to enhance innovation-innovation is driven by individual champions
• Maintain, attract and enrich human capital to provide a solid base for innovations
• Encourage and nurture individual creativity and energy while maintaining guidance and direction
• We need people with a proper level of education in mathematics, science, technology and business
Innovation process
• Mapping the future business environment• Innovation strategy• Implementation of the strategy• Expanding the markets and ecosystems
Mapping the future business environment
• Changing political, economic and regulatory landscapes, technology developments, global and regional markets and value chain analyses, competitor and competing ecosystem evolution, changes in customer preferences in terms of functionality, design and usability, etc.
Connectivity Scorecard 2011
ArgentinaBrazilChileColombiaMexico
CanadaUSA
Bangladesh ChinaIndiaIndonesiaMalaysiaPhilippinesSri LankaThailandVietnam
Australia JapanKoreaSingaporeNew Zealand
EgyptKenyaNigeriaSouth AfricaTunisia
RussiaUkraineTurkey
Austria BelgiumCzech DenmarkFinland
France GermanyGreece Hungary Ireland
ItalyNetherlandsNorwayPolandPortugal
SpainSwedenUK
Innovation economies
Resource & Efficiency economies
IranPakistanSyria
Connectivity Scorecard 2011 May 2011
© 2011 Nokia Affordable
mobile communications, TCO study 2011
2010 returned the TCO development back on track after negative development in 2009
- 4 %
- 12 %
- 43%0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
2005 2007
USD
handset 11%
service 74%
tax 15%2009 was the first year since 2005 that witnessed increase in TCO as an aftermath for the financial crisis. 2010 put the development to the right track and overall TCO has decreased by 14% between 2005 and 2010.
handset 8%
service 78%
tax 14%
2008handset 7%
service 79%
tax 14%
2010handset 7%
service 76%
tax 17%
2009 unpublished
results NOTES
© 2011 Nokia Affordable
mobile communications, TCO study 2011
8
TCO < USD 5 enables the majority of the lower-income consumers to use mobile communications
US d
olla
rs
0
5
10
15
20
25
Average 11.47 US dollars
Bangla
desh
Sri
Lanka
Chin
aPa
kist
an
In
dia
Uzb
eki
stan
Kenya
Egypt
Vie
tnam
Sudan
Iran
Eth
iopia
Cam
bodia
Thaila
nd
Ghan
aU
ganda
Tanza
nia
Hait
iIn
donesi
aA
lgeri
aPhili
pp
ines
Tunis
iaB
oliv
iaG
uate
mala
Moza
mbiq
ue
Nig
eri
aSenegal
Syri
aH
ondu
ras
Côte
d'Iv
oir
e
Kaza
khst
an
Ecu
ador
Dom
inic
al
Rep
ublic
Guin
ea
South
Afr
ica
Madag
asc
ar
Zim
babw
eB
urk
ina F
aso
DR
CC
olo
mb
iaZ
am
bia
Mala
wi
Chile
Cam
ero
on
Moro
cco
Turk
ey
Chad
Arg
enti
na
Peru
Bra
zil
Eleven countries reach the monthly TCO target of 5USD or less.From regions APAC is most affordable with average TCO with less than 5USD monthly.
NOTES
Innovation strategy
• Involves the SWOT analysis of the company capabilities with respect to the changing global competition and defines the key objectives and actions required to achieve them.
• Integration with the business strategy; In house v.s. Partnering; Open innovation; IPR solutions, Public/private partnership, Crowd sourcing,
Open Innovation
• Access and drive global intellectual vision and insight
• Form strategic collaborations with world-leading institutions to multiply our efforts
• Build global test beds to learn from broader audiences
Engaging the World’s Leading Institutions
EO.PPT /Lund 7-8.7.2009
Open Innovation
Research
Education
Knowledgesharing
University
EO.PPT /Lund 7-8.7.2009
Open Innovation/Knowledge Sharing
• Complementary competence and excellence
• Genuine commitment for knowledge
sharing/trust
• Collaboration platforms/joint campus
presence
• Mobility of research personnel
• R&D/recruitment/education all involved
• Transparent management and collaboration
rules
• Fair rules for IPR ownership and use
• Reformed reward and incentive systems
IPR solutions
• Full ownership – open access• How to manage the IPR portfolio: Licensing, (FRAND
principles) sharing, free access• Joint ownership• Right to use• Foreground, Background, Sideground
IPR Guidelines for ICT Shok
1) Foreground: all parties have access right royalty-free to all foreground generated in the project
2) Background:
• A) parties shall grant access right to background if it is needed for the project work (royalty free)
• B) parties shall grant access right to background if it is needed for the commercialization of foreground (FRAND)
• C) each consortia decides if they will create inclusion lists or exclusion lists
3) Ownership: Joint ownership is not preferred
Implementation of the strategy
• Involves resource allocation, product and service specifications, milestones and progress approval decision
Expanding the markets and ecosystems
• Expanding the market prospects of the new innovation
Implementation of the strategy
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
ProjectLaunch
Control point 1Decision go/no go
Control point 2go/no go
Control point 3To the market
Issues to be followed in addition to the progress: business environment,competition, markets, opportunities for partnering/outsourcing etc.
Time
Involves resource allocation, product and service specifications, milestones and progress approval decision
Expanding the markets and ecosystems
• Expanding the market prospects of the new innovation
Innovation networksenable new ways of knowledge creation and utilization
Demand orchestration
Innovationorchestration
Architectureorchestration
Supply orchestration
Demand orchestration
Architectureorchestration
Supply orchestration
Innovationorchestration
Demand orchestration
Architectureorchestration
Supply orchestration
Innovationorchestration
Demand orchestration
Architectureorchestration
Supply orchestration
Innovationorchestration
Demand orchestration
Architectureorchestration
Supply orchestration
Innovationorchestration
Demand orchestration
Architectureorchestration
Supply orchestration
Innovationorchestration
Demand orchestration
Architectureorchestration
Supply orchestration
Innovationorchestration
Demand orchestration
Architectureorchestration
Supply orchestration
Innovationorchestration
Demand orchestration
Architectureorchestration
Supply orchestration
Innovationorchestration
Core
Partners
with orchestration capability
to extended enterprise
Core
From traditional large
enterprise
Crowdsourcing
Open Innovation
User InnovationCo-Creation
Social media
Source: Modified from Schenk and Guittard, 2009
Concluding remarks
• Innovation processes are in transition; Network collaboration, open innovation, public/private partnerships; crowd sourcing; social media; etc.
• Respect the new innovation paradigm• Innovation processes are complex and systemic; not linear• Will challenge the innovation policy intrument portfolio• A joint R&D program with Aalto, TEKES, Technology
Industries and the Federation of the Finnish Industries• A wider European study in preparation in collaboration with
the OECD and the ERT
A Pilot Study in Finland; Industry
Sponsors: TEKES, the Federation of the Finnish Industries and the Federation of Technology Industries;
Interviewed around 25 large corporations and 60 SMEs
Prelimanary observations:• Business environment analysis comprehensive, but implications to own business
development/innovation strategy remains vague• Internal innovation magement process discrimate often disruptive innovations• Innovation gap: large corporations market interest > 100 milloin €, SMEs < 10
million ۥ The use of new innovations tools is activily discussed but thier implementation to
the innovation process weak (open innovation, growd sourcing, big data, industrial Internet, PPPs)
An extensive training campaign for companies in autumn 2014 organized by the industry federations
A Pilot Study in Finland; Policy
• Innovation policy instruments tend to orient towards incremental innovation; new tools required to support disruptive innovation
• Innovation policy should support network building/systems integration and the implemenation of the new innovation tools
• More emphasis on new value domains, services, business models, value chains and value creation
• Instruments to support the accumulation of VC• New incentives needed to support PPPs• Eliminate skills shortages• How to promote innovation when manufacturing is ’off shored’
Thank you