Initial Management of Complex Pelvic Fractures

70
Initial Management of Complex Pelvic Fractures Jeffrey Anderson, MD Saint Mary’s Trauma Center 05 May 2011

Transcript of Initial Management of Complex Pelvic Fractures

Initial Management of Complex

Pelvic Fractures

Jeffrey Anderson, MDSaint Mary’s Trauma Center

05 May 2011

Course Objectives

• Identify high risk pelvic fractures

• Attain basic knowledge of biomechanics involved

with pelvic fractures

• Understand initial management strategy for

complex pelvic fractures

• Awareness of potential pitfalls in management

• Understand which patients require angiographic

studies versus exploratory laparotomy

Overview of Problem

• Common: 5-10% of all high-speed MVC

occupants will sustain pelvic fractures

• High incidence of serious associated

injuries

• Highly lethal: some studies show a mortality

approaching 50%

• Good outcomes require a rapid and

multidisciniplary team approach

Pelvic Ligaments

Pelvic Ligaments

PELVIC VASCULAR ANATOMY

PELVIC VASCULAR ANAOTMY

With high impact pelvic

fractures approximately

15-20% of bleeding is

arterial; from branches of

internal iliac arteries

PELVIC STABILITY

• Bony pelvis has no inherent stability

– pelvic stability highly dependent on ligaments

• Symphysis and sacral-iliac ligaments

• Fractures of the pelvis imply high energy forces

• MVC, MCC

• pedestrian vs auto

• fall from height

• pelvis is a bony ring and hence fractures typically occur at

two or more sites

PELVIC STABILITY

• Anterior stability

– Pubic symphysis and pubic bones act as a strut

• sectioning of the symphysis creates a diastasis of less than 2.0

cm

• Posterior stability

– stability depends on integrity of sacroiliac complex

• sectioning of the symphysis and the anterior sacroiliac

ligaments allows symphysis to separate > 2.5 cm

• sectioning of the symphysis and both anterior and posterior

sacroiliac ligaments allows for vertical instability

Pelvic Ligaments

• Major contributor to

pelvic stability• Pubic symphysis

• Anterior and posterior

sacroiliac ligaments

Young and Burgess Classification

of Pelvic Fractures

• Useful in the clinical setting

• Addresses injury mechanism and

• Seeks to quantify forces involved

– anterior posterior compression

– lateral compression

– vertical shear

– combination

• Young and Burgess Classification Pelvic Fractures

– AP compression (APC) - direct anterior force

• Type 1: disruption of pubic symphysis < 2.0 cm

– low energy forces (sports)

– stable

• Type 2: symphysis > 2.0 cm and disruption of

anterior SI ligaments

– high energy, “open book”; MVC, ped vs auto

– unstable

– high risk hemorrhage

• Type 3: symphysis > 2.0 cm and disruption of

anterior and posterior SI ligaments

– very unstable

– highest incidence of major hemorrhage

Anterior-Posterior Compression (APC)

• APC 1

– anterior force of mild-

moderate force (sports)

– symphysis separation

< 2cm

– stretching of anterior

sacroiliac ligaments

– stable fracture

Anterior-Posterior Injury

• Grade I

• Symphysis < 2cm

• SI joints intact

Anterior-Posterior Compression (APC)

• APC 2

– anterior force of high

energy

– “open book”

– symphysis > 2cm

– tearing of sacroiliac

ligaments

– unstable fracture

Anterior-Posterior Compression (APC)

• APC 3

– high energy force

– hemipelvis rotates

externally

– symphysis >2cm

– rupture of anterior &

posterior sacroiliac

ligaments

– highest incidence of

major hemorrhage

– unstable fracture

Open Book Pelvic Fractures

– Symphysis > 2cm

– Disruption SI joint

– High incidence hemorrhage

– Mortality approaches 50%

• Young and Burgess

– lateral compression (LC)

• Type 1: unilateral rami fracture and ipsilateral

sacroiliac compression - stable

• Type 2: unilateral rami fracture and ipsilateral

posterior sacroiliac fracture

– unstable fracture

– high risk for hemorrhage

• Type 3: type 2 plus injury to contralateral

hemipelvis

– unstable fracture

– high risk for hemorrhage

Lateral Compression Fractures

• Type I:

• Pubic rami fracture

• Sacral compression

• stable

• Type 2:

• Pubic rami fracture

• Iliac fracture

• Unstable

• Higher incidence

hemorrhage

Lateral compression fractures

• Bilateral pubic rami fractures

• Sacral deformity / fracture

• Lateral compression type fractures are usually stable and rarely hemodynamically unstable

Lateral Compression (LC)

• LC 3

– bilateral LC 2

– crush type injury

– unstable fracture

Classification Pelvic Fractures

• Young and Burgess

– vertical shear (VS): fall

from a height

• Vertical displacement

of hemipelvis

• unstable

• high incidence of

hemorrhage

VERTICAL SHEAR

• Complete disruption of

hemipelvis

• anterior and posterior

vertical displacement

• fall from a height

• high incidence of pelvic

hemorrhage

• unstable pelvis

UNSTABLE PELVIS

• APC2, APC3, LC2, LC3,

VS, and combination

injuries are all unstable pelvic

fractures and are associated with a

higher incidence of vascular

disruption and hemodynamic

compromise

• this does not imply that bony

instability equates to hemodynamic

instability

Pelvic Fractures

• High energy

– MVC, falls from

height, crush injury

– 75% associated injuries

– 15-25% intra-

abdominal injuries

– often hemodynamically

unstable

– mortality up to 55%

• Low energy

– falls from standing

• Lateral compression

– elderly / osteopenic

– associated injuries

uncommon

– hemodynamically

stable

– mortality < 1%

AP Pelvis Radiograph

• Indicators of potential

vasculature injury:• diastasis symphysis >

2.0 cm

• fractures all 4 rami

• widening SI joint >0.5

cm

• vertical displacement at

the SI joint

High Energy Pelvic Fractures

• MVC, auto-pedestrian, motorcycle accidents

• 5-10% of high speed MVCs will sustain pelvic fractures

• mortality correlates highly to hemodynamic stability

• stable < 4%

• unstable > 50%

• mortality:

• 50% acute hemorrhage

• 25% associated injuries

• 25% sepsis / MODS

• associated injuries: TBI, thoracic, intra-abdominal

Physical findings may indicate pelvic

fractures

• Labial, scrotal, perineal swelling / ecchymosis

• deformities lower extremities

• open wounds - rectal / vaginal blood necessitates

sigmoidoscopy / speculum examinations

• urethral injuries• blood at meatus

• high riding prostate

• scrotal/labial hematoma

• sacral nerve root injuries

• Physical maneuvers to establish pelvic

stability are of questionable benefit

• pelvic rock, springing, compression, distraction are

crude and insensitive

• exacerbate hemorrhage and soft tissue injury

• painful and unnecessary maneuvers

– initial pelvic radiographs better indicator of stability

Routine Pelvic X-rays

• Examination of the pelvis is extremely unreliable;

especially in the obtunded, intoxicated, or obese patients

• Routine A-P pelvic and chest x-ray is still indicated in the

multiply or obtunded injured patient

• Hemorrhage in pelvic fractures:

– Venous bleeding (85%)

• fracture surfaces of cancellous bone

• venous plexuses

– Arterial bleeding (15%) - from branches of the superior

gluteal artery ( fracture through sciatic notch) or other branches of

internal iliac artery

• Most common source of significant hemorrhage in

pelvic fractures is NOT the pelvis

Pelvic Stabilization

• Purpose:• controls non-arterial hemorrhage

• aids in clot formation

• decreases fracture site movement and clot

dislodgement

• decreases volume of pelvis and promotes tamponade

• exact mechanism in which stabilization decreases

hemorrhage has not been elucidated

Pelvic Stabilization

• Three basic methods:• non-invasive techniques

• external fixation

• open reduction / internal fixation

Pelvic Stabilization

• 1. Non-invasive techniques:– Sheet wrap

– Proprietary devices / binders

• Most appropriate in the trauma bay for unstable

pelvic fractures

• temporary measures

• Controls hemorrhage as effectively as external

fixation

Pelvic Stabilization

• Sheet wrap• Inexpensive

• Fast

• Effective

• Temporary

Pelvic Binders

• T POD

– Cost: $125.00

– Fast

– Efficient

– Temporary

T-Pod: Non-invasive Pelvic Stabilization

Pelvic Stabilization

• External fixation devices:• anterior fixation device - ideally suited for “open-book”

deformities

• C-clamp device - ideally suited for posterior disruptions

– unstable pelvic fractures associated with hypotension

– can be placed in the trauma bay, OR, ICU

– should be placed prior to skin incision in patients

needing a laparotomy

– complications / drawbacks:

Pelvic Stabilization

• External Fixation:• “Fast”

• Orthopedic consultation

• Effective

• Typically temporary

External Fixation

• Should be applied as soon as possible with unstable pelvis

• May be applied in trauma bay, OR, or TICU

• Anterior bridging bars placed low over pelvis so as not to interfere with laparotomy incision

• Ideally placed prior to laparotomy

External Fixation

Pelvic Stabilization

• Internal stabilization:• limited value in the

acute setting

– occasionally used in

“open-book”

deformities after

laparotomy in the

stable patient

• reserved for patients

who are

hemodynamically stable

• definitive treatment

• No convincing data to support one method of pelvic stabilization over another in the acute setting:

• all methods equally effective

• T-POD HAS GAINED WIDE EXCETANCE

• But studies do support some form of bony stabilization

• decreases hemorrhage

• decreases transfusion requirements

PRINCIPLES OF ANGIOGRAPHY AND

EMBOLIZATION

• Used to control bleeding that cannot be corrected with

surgery

• Purpose is to slow bleeding rather than create large areas

of ischemia and necrosis

• Limit areas of ischemia and necrosis to smallest extent

possible

• Must be done expeditiously prior to onset of “lethal triade”

Angiography

• HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK:

• Surgically correctable injuries directly to operating room

• Non-surgically correctable injuries to angiographic department

Pelvic Angiogram

Angiography

• Approximately 7-11% of pelvic fractures will require

embolization to control arterial bleeding.

• lateral compression fractures: 2%

• anteroposterior compression: 20%

• vertical shear injury: 20%

• combination: 20%

• Approximately 25-40% of cases will require embolization of more

than one artery

• Segina, D., Agnew,S., OTA Annual Meeting 2000

Angiographic Embolization

• Embolization is only

effective for arterial

source of hemorrhage

-90% effective

When To Transfer to Angiography ?

• IMMEDIATELY:• Patients who are

hemodynamically

unstable as the result of

their pelvic fractures

AND if laparotomy is

not indicated

Hypotension and Associated High

Energy Pelvic Fracture

• Etiology of hypotension will be secondary

to non-pelvic sources at least 50% of time• thorax

• abdomen

• long bone fractures

• externally / at the scene

5 Major Sites of Blood Loss

• Chest

• Abdomen

• Retroperitoneum

• Muscle compartment of thigh

• Injury scene

Problem!

• Where is the source of hemorrhage / hypotension?

– If solely related to the pelvic fracture(s) - then

angiography and embolization is the best and initial

therapeutic option

– If hemorrhage secondary to an abdominal injury then

laparotomy is the best and initial therapeutic option

– If hemorrhage secondary to a thoracic injury then tube

thoracostomy and possibly thoracotomy is indicated

• How to determine source of bleeding?

Diagnosing intra-abdominal hemorrhage

• FAST

• Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL)

• Diagnostic peritoneal tap: supra-umbilical

approach appears to be the most reliable test for intra-

abdominal hemorrhage, which requires laparotomy

• CT scan

• E.A.S.T., Practice Management Guidelines, 2001

Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma

• FAST

• Ultrasound examination to

determine presence of free

fluid in the pericardial or

peritoneal cavities

• High sensitivity /

specificity

Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage

Diagnostic Peritoneal Tap

• Catheter introduced

through a supraumbilical

incision

• 5-10cc gross blood is

positive tap and an

indication for immediate

laparotomy

• 1 liter crystalloid solution

infused

Critical Questions ?

• Which patients warrant early pelvic

stabilization?

• Which patients warrant pelvic angiography

and possible embolization?

• Which patients warrant emergent

laparotomy?

Early Pelvic Stabilization

• Patients with unstable pelvic fractures

associated with hypovolemia

• All patients with “unstable pelvis”

diastasis of symphysis > 2.0

cm

fractures all 4 rami

widening SI joint >0.5 cm

vertical displacement at the

SI joint

Early Angiography

• Pelvic fractures with signs of ongoing hemorrhage after non-pelvic sources of blood loss have been ruled-out

• Patients with pelvic fractures with ongoing hemorrhage that cannot be controlled at laparotomy

• Arterial extravasation noted in pelvis on CT scan

Emergent Laparotomy

• Patients with hypotension and gross blood

in the abdomen or evidence intestinal

perforation

• FAST / DPL are most reliable diagnostic

tests

Initial Management

• initial assessment: “ABCDE’s”

• radiographic assessment: CXR, A-P pelvis, FAST

• hemodynamically unstable patients:

– 50% of patients with severe pelvic fractures are

bleeding from sources other than the pelvis

– associated injuries very common

– determine source of hemorrhage!!

• “patients in hemorrhagic shock with a

surgically correctable lesion should be

transported to the OR”

• “patient in hemorrhagic shock with an

unknown source of bleeding, as well as,

lesions best treated by embolization should

be transported to the angiography suite”

• Bassam, D., Am. Surg., 1998, 862-867

When to perform laparotomy

• Indications for laparotomy in the face of

hypotension and pelvic fractures remain the same

• intra-abdominal hemorrhage

• intestinal perforation

• peritoneal signs

Intraoperative Management

• If laparotomy is required for ongoing bleeding:

• control non-pelvic sources of hemorrhage

• if pelvic bleeding identified; enlarging hematoma

– do not open retroperitoneum

– pack pelvis

– exercise damage control

– escort patient to angiography suite: embolization is the

best method to control pelvic arterial bleeding; effective in

90% of cases

Open Pelvic Fractures

• Fracture site communicates through the skin, rectum,

vagina

• High incidence of associated injuries, mortality approaches

80%

• Vital to make diagnosis early - blood in rectum / vagina

necessitates further evaluation

• basic tenants apply to all open fractures - thorough irrigation

and debridement, prophylactic antibiotics, fracture stabilization

Open Pelvic Fractures

• Treatment same

• Early prophylactic

antibiotics• ancef / gentamycin

CONCLUSION

• Do not delay treatment

• Priorities remain the same: ABCDE’s

• Pelvic stabilization mandatory

• Rule –out other sources of bleeding

• Exploratory laparotomy: indications remain the same

• Angiography / embolization: must be considered

early to mobilize appropriate personnel

• early transfer to a trauma center may be life

saving