IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE … · offerings, including technical support...
Transcript of IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE … · offerings, including technical support...
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) IQOR HOLDINGS INC., et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-34500 (DRJ) ) Debtors. ) (Joint Administration Requested) ) (Emergency Hearing Requested)
DEBTORS’ EMERGENCY MOTION
FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) PAY PREPETITION WAGES, SALARIES, OTHER
COMPENSATION, AND REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES AND (B) CONTINUE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PROGRAMS, AND (II) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF
EMERGENCY RELIEF HAS BEEN REQUESTED. A HEARING WILL BE CONDUCTED ON THIS MATTER ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2020, AT 10:30 A.M. (CENTRAL TIME) AT THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, 515 RUSK, HOUSTON, TX 77002. IF YOU OBJECT TO THE RELIEF REQUESTED OR YOU BELIEVE THAT EMERGENCY CONSIDERATION IS NOT WARRANTED, YOU MUST EITHER APPEAR AT THE HEARING OR FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE PRIOR TO THE HEARING. OTHERWISE, THE COURT MAY TREAT THE PLEADING AS UNOPPOSED AND GRANT THE RELIEF REQUESTED.
RELIEF IS REQUESTED NOT LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 11, 2020.
PLEASE NOTE THAT ON MARCH 24, 2020, THROUGH THE ENTRY OF GENERAL ORDER 2020-10, THE COURT INVOKED THE PROTOCOL FOR EMERGENCY PUBLIC HEALTH OR SAFETY CONDITIONS.
IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT ALL PERSONS WILL APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AND ALSO MAY APPEAR VIA VIDEO AT THIS HEARING.
AUDIO COMMUNICATION WILL BE BY USE OF THE COURT’S DIAL-IN FACILITY. YOU MAY ACCESS THE FACILITY AT (832) 917-1510. YOU WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR OWN LONG-DISTANCE CHARGES. ONCE CONNECTED, YOU WILL BE ASKED TO ENTER THE CONFERENCE ROOM NUMBER. JUDGE JONES’S CONFERENCE ROOM NUMBER IS 205691.
YOU MAY VIEW VIDEO VIA GOTOMEETING. TO USE GOTOMEETING, THE COURT RECOMMENDS THAT YOU DOWNLOAD THE FREE GOTOMEETING APPLICATION. TO CONNECT, YOU SHOULD ENTER THE MEETING CODE “JUDGEJONES” IN THE GOTOMEETING APP OR CLICK THE LINK ON JUDGE JONES’S HOME PAGE ON THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WEBSITE. ONCE CONNECTED, CLICK THE SETTINGS ICON IN THE UPPER RIGHT CORNER AND ENTER YOUR NAME UNDER THE PERSONAL INFORMATION SETTING.
HEARING APPEARANCES MUST BE MADE ELECTRONICALLY IN ADVANCE OF THE HEARING. TO MAKE YOUR ELECTRONIC APPEARANCE, GO TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WEBSITE AND SELECT “BANKRUPTCY COURT” FROM THE TOP MENU. SELECT “JUDGES’ PROCEDURES,” THEN “VIEW HOME PAGE” FOR JUDGE JONES. UNDER
1 A complete list of each of the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’
proposed claims and noticing agent at https://omniagentsolutions.com/iqor. The location of the Debtors’ service address is: 200 Central Avenue, 7th Floor, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 1 of 33
2
“ELECTRONIC APPEARANCE” SELECT “CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT ELECTRONIC APPEARANCE”. SELECT THE CASE NAME, COMPLETE THE REQUIRED FIELDS AND CLICK “SUBMIT” TO COMPLETE YOUR APPEARANCE.
The above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) state
the following in support of this motion (this “Motion”):2
Relief Requested
1. The Debtors seek entry of an order, substantially in the attached form
(the “Order”), (a) authorizing, but not directing, the Debtors to (i) pay prepetition wages, salaries,
other compensation, reimbursable expenses, and non-insider severance obligations, and
(ii) continue employee benefits programs in the ordinary course, including payment of certain
prepetition obligations related thereto, and (b) granting related relief.
Jurisdiction and Venue
2. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas
(the “Court”) has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334. This matter is a core
proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b). The Debtors confirm their consent, pursuant
to rule 7008 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), to the entry
of a final order by the Court.
3. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409.
4. The bases for the relief requested herein are sections 105(a), 363(b), and 507(a) of
title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532 (the “Bankruptcy Code”), Bankruptcy
2 The facts and circumstances supporting this Motion are set forth in the Declaration of David A. Kaminsky, Chief
Financial Officer of iQor Holdings Inc., in Support of Debtors’ Chapter 11 Petitions and First Day Motions (the “First Day Declaration”), filed contemporaneously with this Motion and incorporated by reference herein. Capitalized terms used but not immediately defined have the meanings given to them elsewhere in this Motion or in the First Day Declaration, as applicable.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 2 of 33
3
Rules 6003 and 6004, and rule 9013-1 of the Bankruptcy Local Rules for the Southern District of
Texas (the “Bankruptcy Local Rules”).
Background
5. The Debtors (together with their non-Debtor affiliates, the “Company”) comprise a
multinational business process outsourcing company that provides a range of intelligent customer
support and outsourcing services to some of the world’s largest brands. The Company’s operations
consist of two primary business segments—the customer care/call center business and the product
support business. The Company’s call center business provides customers with multiple service
offerings, including technical support solutions, omnichannel customer experience solutions,
analytical enabled customer retention solutions and revenue generation support services. The
Company’s product support business provides customers with technical services and supply chain
solutions, including repair services, quality assurance, kitting and packing, asset recovery and
recycling services, supply chain management, and service parts logistics. The Company is
headquartered in St. Petersburg, Florida, but its operations are extensive and span across North
America, Europe, and Asia. The Company operates more than 40 call centers in eight countries
and prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, employed approximately 40,000 people globally.
6. On the date hereof (the “Petition Date”), each Debtor filed a voluntary petition for
relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors are operating their businesses and
managing their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the
Bankruptcy Code. Concurrently with the filing of this Motion, the Debtors filed a motion
requesting procedural consolidation and joint administration of these chapter 11 cases pursuant to
Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b). No request for the appointment of a trustee or examiner has been made
in these chapter 11 cases, and no committees have been appointed or designated.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 3 of 33
4
The Debtors’ Workforce3
7. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors employ approximately 6,610 full-time
employees (the “Employees”) and retain approximately 383 individuals via a professional
employer organization (the “PEO Employees”).4 Approximately 5,682 Employees are
compensated on an hourly basis, and approximately 928 are salaried. The PEO Employees include
individuals that are employees of American One Source, Inc. (“AOS”) but work full-time for the
Debtors. The Debtors pay AOS on a bi-weekly basis, consistent with the Debtors’ payroll
calendar for Employees. In addition to the Employees and the PEO Employees, the Debtors’
workforce also includes approximately 350 independent contractors and temporary workers
(collectively, the “Temporary Staff”) to who complete discrete projects and provide necessary
services to supplement the efforts of the Employees. The Temporary Staff work on-site at the
Debtors’ facilities and remotely pursuant to various contractual arrangements between the Debtors
and the Temporary Staff (in the case of independent contractors) or the Debtors and the staffing
agency employing the Temporary Staff (in the case of other temporary workers).
3 In addition to the Debtors’ Employees, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Debtors’ non-Debtor foreign
affiliates employed approximately 31,190 employees throughout the Philippines, India, Mexico, Canada, Poland, Panama, Hong Kong, and Trinidad (collectively, the “Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees”). As described further in the Debtors’ Emergency Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (I) Authorizing the Debtors to (A) Continue to Operate their Cash Management System and Maintain Existing Bank Accounts, and (B) Continue to Perform Intercompany Transactions and (II) Granting Related Relief (the “Cash Management Motion”), filed contemporaneously herewith, the Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees provide services that directly benefit the Debtors’ estates and the Debtors fund payroll and related employee obligations for certain of the Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees through ordinary course intercompany transactions (collectively, the “Non-Debtor Affiliate Obligations”). The Debtors highlight this part of the Company’s payroll process for the purpose of transparency and are not requesting authority by this Motion to continue funding the Non-Debtor Affiliate Obligations, but are requesting such relief in the Cash Management Motion.
4 As a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic and the related government-mandated “shelter-in-place” orders, the Company reduced its global workforce and instituted a furlough program that affected employees across the globe. The Company expects to restore its workforce once the public health crisis subsides.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 4 of 33
5
8. The Employees, Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees, PEO Employees, and
Temporary Staff perform a wide variety of functions, which are critical to the preservation of value
and the administration of the Debtors’ estates. The Employees, Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees,
PEO Employees, and Temporary Staff cannot be easily replaced as these individuals are intimately
familiar with the Debtors’ businesses, processes, and systems, and possess unique skills and
experience with respect to the Debtors’ operations. Without the continued, uninterrupted services
of the Employees, Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees, PEO Employees, and the Temporary Staff,
the Debtors’ business operations will be halted immediately and the administration of the estates
materially impaired. These workers will be unfairly harmed if the Debtors are not permitted to
continue paying or funding employee compensation and providing health and other benefits during
these chapter 11 cases. The relief requested in this Motion is necessary and appropriate under the
facts and circumstances of these chapter 11 cases.
Compensation and Benefits
9. The Debtors seek authority to: (a) pay and honor certain prepetition claims and
continue to honor obligations on a postpetition basis relating to, among other things, wages,
salaries, other compensation, expense reimbursement, payroll obligations and withholding of
federal and state taxes (including garnishments, Employee’s share of insurance premiums, taxes,
and other amounts withheld), payroll processing, health and welfare benefits for active Employees,
insurance programs, workers’ compensation benefits, short and long-term disability coverage, paid
time-off policies, non-insider severance, non-insider retention and bonus programs, the Debtors’
deferred compensation plan, and certain other benefits that the Debtors have historically provided
in the ordinary course (collectively, the “Compensation and Benefits”); and (b) pay all costs
incidental to the Compensation and Benefits. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate the
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 5 of 33
6
total amount outstanding on account of Compensation and Benefits obligations is approximately
$21.0 million.
10. Subject to the Court’s approval of the relief requested herein, the Debtors intend to
continue their prepetition Compensation and Benefits programs in the ordinary course of business
on a postpetition basis. Out of an abundance of caution, the Debtors request the right to modify,
change, and discontinue the Compensation and Benefits and to implement new programs, policies,
and benefits in the ordinary course of business during these chapter 11 cases, in the Debtors’ sole
discretion and without the need for further Court approval, subject to the Bankruptcy Code and
applicable law.
I. Compensation and Withholding Obligations.
A. Employee Wages.
11. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors incur payroll obligations for base
wages and salaries owed to Employees (the “Wages”). Generally, Employees are paid Wages on
a bi-weekly basis. Because the Debtors pay accrued Wages one week in arrears, Employees may
be owed accrued but unpaid Wages as of the Petition Date. Wages may also be due and owing as
of the Petition Date because of, among other things, potential discrepancies between the amounts
paid and the amounts that Employees believe they should have been paid, which, upon resolution,
may reveal that additional amounts are owed to these Employees.
12. The Debtors also maintain a payroll advance program (the “Payroll Advance Program”),
under which eligible Employees may borrow up to $500 against their earned Wages per pay period.
Under the Payroll Advance Program, Employee draws are initiated, funded, and processed through
a third-party software platform provided by PayActiv, Inc. (“PayActiv”). Once an Employee draw
is initiated through PayActiv, the Debtors typically fund the draw request within one business day.
Under the Payroll Advance Program, Employees are restricted from submitting draw requests less
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 6 of 33
7
than two days prior to each payroll date. To the extent that an Employee borrows against his or
her earned Wages under the Payroll Advance Program, the Debtors will deduct the aggregate
amount drawn from the Employee’s Wages for the applicable pay period.5
13. During the twelve-month period preceding the Petition Date, the Debtors paid
approximately $18.6 million per month on account of all Wages in the aggregate. As of the
Petition Date, the Debtors believe they owe approximately $1.9 million on account of Wages, net
of withholding obligations. By this Motion, the Debtors seek authority to: (a) pay all outstanding
prepetition amounts on account of Wages; (b) continue paying Wages on a postpetition basis in
the ordinary course of business consistent with their prepetition practices; and (c) continue the
Payroll Advance Program on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business consistent with
their prepetition practices.
B. PEO Employee Obligations.
14. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors incur payment obligations to AOS
for the PEO Employees’ performance of critical business functions that support the Debtors’
Employees and product support business operations (the “PEO Employee Obligations”).
The Debtors pay PEO Employee Obligations on a bi-weekly basis consistent with the timing of
the Debtors’ Employee payroll obligations. The PEO Employees are not eligible to receive the
Employee Health and Welfare Benefits as the PEO Employees are provided benefits through AOS.
15. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors believe they owe approximately $201,000 in
the aggregate on account of PEO Employee Obligations. The Debtors believe the authority to
continue to pay PEO Employee Obligations owed to AOS is critical to maintain the supplemental
5 These deductions do not give rise to a withholding obligation on the part of the Debtors; rather, the Debtors retain
the deducted amounts. Thus, such amounts do not constitute Withholding Obligations and are not discussed in the “Withholding Obligations” section of this Motion.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 7 of 33
8
services provided by the PEO Employees. Accordingly, by this Motion, the Debtors seek authority
to pay all outstanding prepetition amounts owed on account of the PEO Employee Obligations and
to continue paying the PEO Employee Obligations on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course
of business consistent with their prepetition practices.
C. Temporary Staff Obligations.
16. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors incur payment obligations to the
Temporary Staff, or to the agency employing the Temporary Staff, on account of the Temporary
Staff’s work for the Debtors (the “Temporary Staff Obligations”). The Debtors pay Temporary
Staff Obligations on a bi-weekly or monthly basis. The Temporary Staff perform critical business
functions that support the Debtors’ Employees and their business operations. The Debtors believe
the authority to continue paying Temporary Staff Obligations is critical to maintaining and
administering their estates. The Temporary Staff are not eligible to receive Employee Health and
Welfare Benefits.
17. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors believe they owe approximately $899,000 in
the aggregate on account of Temporary Staff Obligations. Payment of the Temporary Staff
Obligations is vital to the Debtors’ continued retention of the Temporary Staff, who are crucial to
the Debtors’ business operations. The Debtors seek authority to pay all outstanding prepetition
amounts owed on account of the Temporary Staff Obligations and to continue paying the
Temporary Staff Obligations on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business consistent
with their prepetition practices.
D. Withholding Obligations and Payroll Processing Fees.
1. Withholding Obligations.
18. Pursuant to certain federal and state laws, the Debtors are required to withhold
certain amounts from Employees’ gross pay related to federal, state, and local income taxes, as
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 8 of 33
9
well as Social Security and Medicare taxes (collectively, the “Employee Payroll Taxes”) for
remittance to the appropriate federal, state, or local taxing authority. The Debtors must then match
the Employee Payroll Taxes from their own funds and pay, based on a percentage of gross payroll,
additional amounts for federal and state unemployment insurance and Social Security and
Medicare Taxes (together with the Employee Payroll Taxes, the “Payroll Taxes”). During the
twelve-month period preceding the Petition Date, the Debtors paid approximately $4.8 million per
month on account of the Payroll Taxes.
19. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors also deduct certain amounts from
Employees’ gross pay, including (a) garnishments, alimony and child support, and other similar
deductions; and (b) certain other pre- and post-tax deductions withheld on account of certain of
the Employee Health and Welfare Benefits, such as an Employee’s share of insurance
coverage premiums, 401(k) contributions, and legally ordered or miscellaneous deductions
(collectively, the “Deductions” and, together with the Payroll Taxes, the “Withholding Obligations”).
During the twelve-month period preceding the Petition Date, the Debtors withheld approximately
$1.2 million per month on account of all Deductions.
20. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors believe that they have deducted, but not yet
remitted to the appropriate third-party payees, approximately $1.08 million in Withholding
Obligations. The Debtors believe that any amounts held by the Debtors on account of the
Withholding Obligations generally are held in trust by the Debtors and are not property of their
estates. Out of an abundance of caution, the Debtors seek authority to remit all outstanding
prepetition amounts deducted on account of the Withholding Obligations and to continue to deduct
and remit the Withholding Obligations on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business
consistent with their prepetition practices.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 9 of 33
10
2. Payroll Processing Fees.
21. The majority of the Wages are satisfied by direct deposit through the electronic
transfer of funds from the Debtors’ payroll department to each Employee’s bank account, with the
balance of the Employees receiving checks. The Debtors outsource this operation to ADP, LLC
(“ADP”). In particular, ADP serves as the Debtors’ payroll processing vendor and processes
certain Withholding Obligations for the Debtors’ Employees. In the ordinary course of business,
ADP processes direct deposit transfers to Employees from certain disbursement accounts funded
by the Debtors with the amount necessary to satisfy the Debtors’ electronic payroll obligations.
During the twelve-month period preceding the Petition Date, the Debtors paid ADP approximately
$70,000 per month on account of these payroll processing and administration services
(the “Payroll Processing Fees”).
22. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate they owe approximately $80,000 on
account of Payroll Processing Fees. By this Motion, the Debtors seek authority to pay all
outstanding prepetition amounts owed on account of the Payroll Processing Fees and to continue
to pay the amounts associated with the Payroll Processing Fees on a postpetition basis in
the ordinary course of business consistent with their prepetition practices.
II. Reimbursable Expenses.
23. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors reimburse the cost of certain
expenses incurred by Employees in connection with the operation of the Debtors’ businesses
(collectively, the “Reimbursable Expenses”). The Debtors reimburse Employees for qualifying
expenses incurred on their personal financial accounts in carrying out their employment
responsibilities, including, but not limited to, expenses for meals, hotels, flights, car rentals, and
mileage costs.
24. Employees who incur Reimbursable Expenses are required to submit an expense
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 10 of 33
11
report with supporting documentation to the Debtors to request reimbursement for the applicable
expenses. If approved in accordance with internal policies and procedures, the Reimbursable
Expenses are then processed and audited through the Debtors’ accounts payable system and
refunded to Employees on a periodic basis. The Debtors’ inability to reimburse the Reimbursable
Expenses could impose a hardship on the Employees where such individuals incurred obligations
for the Debtors’ benefit. Employees incurred the Reimbursable Expenses as business expenses on
the Debtors’ behalf and with the understanding that such expenses would be reimbursed.
25. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that they owe approximately $15,000
on account of accrued but unpaid Reimbursable Expenses. Additionally, although the Debtors
request that reimbursement requests be submitted promptly, sometimes submission delays occur.
Employees may therefore submit reimbursement requests for prepetition Reimbursable Expenses
after the Petition Date. The Debtors seek authority to pay all outstanding prepetition amounts
owed on account of the Reimbursable Expenses and to continue paying the Reimbursable
Expenses on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business consistent with their prepetition
practices.6
III. Non-Insider Retention and Bonus Programs.7
A. Non-Insider Key Employee Retention Program.
26. Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtors implemented a retention program for
6 Separately, the Debtors maintain 43 corporate purchasing cards with American Express (the “P-Cards”), which
authorized Employees use to charge expenses to (a) procure goods and services used by the Debtors; (b) pay for business-related travel (predominantly hotels and rental cars); and (c) otherwise cover certain departmental-based expenses. Use of the P-Cards, however, does not give rise to Reimbursable Expenses; rather, the Debtors directly pay P-Card invoices. Pursuant to the Cash Management Motion, filed contemporaneously herewith, the Debtors seek authority to pay any prepetition or postpetition amounts incurred in connection with use of the P-Cards on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, the Debtors are not seeking any additional relief with respect to the P-Cards through this Motion.
7 The relief sought in this Motion with respect to the KERP and the Non-Insider Bonus Programs does not include the payment of any obligation to an “Insider” (as that term is defined in section 101(31) of the Bankruptcy Code).
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 11 of 33
12
35 non-insider Employees (the “KERP”). Under the KERP, the Debtors award additional
compensation to Employees participating in the program, with each such Employee eligible to
receive payments on a quarterly basis if the Employee remains employed by the Debtors upon
certain specified dates, or if the Employee incurred a Qualifying Termination (as that term is
defined in the participating Employee’s KERP agreement). As of the Petition Date, the Debtors
do not believe they owe any amounts on account of the KERP. To safeguard employee morale
during these chapter 11 cases, the Debtors seek authority to honor all obligations under the KERP
during these chapter 11 cases.
B. Non-Insider Bonus Programs.
27. The Debtors provide a variety of bonus and incentive programs to their non-insider
Employees based on monthly, quarterly, or annual goals. These plans include: (a) a sales
management incentive plan; (b) monthly, quarterly and annual agent bonus plans; (c) monthly,
quarterly and annual operations bonus plans; (d) product business profit sharing plans; (e) sales
commissions; (f) client incentive plans initiated by the Debtors’ clients and for which the clients
reimburse the Debtors; (g) staff incentive plans developed by the Debtors; and (h) sign-on and
retention bonuses (collectively, the “Non-Insider Bonus Programs”). The Non-Insider Bonus
Programs are an integral part of the compensation that the Employees expect to receive in
exchange for their service to the Debtors. The Debtors believe that the authority to continue to
maintain the Non-Insider Bonus Programs and pay all obligations thereunder is critical to
maintaining Employee morale and to avoid disruption to its workforce.
28. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors believe they owe approximately $1.16 million
on account of Non-Insider Bonus Programs. By this Motion, the Debtors seek authority to
maintain the Non-Insider Bonus Programs, pay all outstanding prepetition amounts on account of
Non-Insider Bonus Programs, and to continue paying amounts under the Non-Insider Bonus
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 12 of 33
13
Programs on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business consistent with their prepetition
practices.
IV. Employee Health and Welfare Benefits.
29. The Debtors offer their full-time Employees who have been employed for thirty
consecutive days (“Eligible Employees”) the ability to participate in a number of health, insurance,
and benefits programs, including, among other programs, medical and prescription, dental, vision,
and hospital indemnity coverage plans, life and accident insurance, disability insurance, critical
illness insurance, savings and spending account programs, and health benefits programs for certain
former employees (collectively, the “Employee Health and Welfare Benefits”). Failure to
continue the Employee Health and Welfare Benefits, particularly in the midst of the current
COVID-19 pandemic, could cause Employees to experience severe hardship and make it difficult
for the Debtors to retain their workforce. The Debtors believe they are authorized to continue the
Employee Health and Welfare Benefits in the ordinary course; however, out of an abundance of
caution the Debtors seek authority to continue the Employee Health and Welfare Benefits on a
postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business (including paying any prepetition amounts
that may be outstanding), consistent with their prepetition practices. The Debtors will not seek to
pay any outstanding Employee Health and Welfare Benefits or fees related thereto in advance of
the date they come due.
A. Health Benefits.
30. The Debtors offer certain former employees and Eligible Employees the
opportunity to participate in a variety of health benefit plans, including self-insured medical and
prescription coverage plans and dental plans, and third-party insured vision plans
(collectively, the “Health Benefits”). The Debtors also subsidize or continue to provide Health
Benefits to certain former Employees after their termination, retirement, or disability leave,
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 13 of 33
14
including (without limitation) benefits provided under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (“COBRA”). The Health Benefits are customary for similarly-sized
companies, and Employees and their dependents have come to rely on the Health Benefits.
Without the Health Benefits, current and former Employees would be forced to either forego health
benefit coverage completely or obtain potentially expensive out-of-pocket insurance coverage,
which would likely adversely affect Employee morale and retention. The Debtors seek authority
to pay or remit all outstanding prepetition amounts incurred on account of the Health Benefits and
to continue paying the Health Benefits on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business
consistent with their prepetition practice.
1. Medical and Dental Plans.
31. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that they owe approximately
$7.6 million in the aggregate on account of accrued but unpaid Medical Plan claims, UHC
Administrative Fees, and Stop-Loss Insurance premiums related to the Medical Plans and Dental
Plans. By this Motion, the Debtors seek authority to (a) pay all outstanding prepetition amounts
owed on account of the Medical Plans and the Dental Plans (including UHC Administrative Fees
and Stop-Loss Insurance premiums); and (b) continue honoring their obligations on account of the
Medical Plans and the Dental Plans (including UHC Administrative Fees and Stop-Loss Insurance
premiums) on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business consistent with their
prepetition practices.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 14 of 33
15
a. Medical Plans.
32. The Debtors offer medical and prescription drug coverage to Eligible Employees
through three plans (collectively, the “Medical Plans”), two of which include health savings
account options. The Medical Plans provide coverage for, among other medical costs, outpatient
and inpatient services, preventative care, and prescription drugs. The Medical Plans are
self-insured by the Debtors; however, the Debtors have contracted with United HealthCare
Services, Inc. (“UHC”) to administer the Medical Plans. Participants in the Medical Plans pay
monthly premiums between approximately $108 and $1,600 depending on the level of coverage
selected under their chosen Medical Plan.
33. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors maintain a $846,000 deposit with UHC to fund
claims made under the Medical Plans (such deposit, the “Medical Claims Deposit”). In the
ordinary course of business, UHC draws on the Medical Claims Deposit to fund claims made under
the Medical Plans. The Debtors replenish the Medical Claims Deposit on a weekly basis to
maintain a $846,000 balance. The Debtors pay, on average, $2.5 million in the aggregate per
month to provide the medical benefits under the Medical Plans. The Debtors’ monthly payments
increase throughout the calendar year as Employees reach their deductible thresholds.
34. The Debtors’ obligations related to medical claims incurred prior the Petition Date
is unknown due to the lag between the time healthcare providers submit claims to UHC
and the time UHC processes these claims. The Debtors account for this uncertainty by
calculating an amount for incurred-but-not-recorded obligations based on prior experience
(the “IBNR Obligations”). As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate the IBNR Obligations to
total approximately $6.7 million in the aggregate.
35. The Debtors pay UHC monthly administration fees based on the number of
employees participating in the Medical Plans (the “UHC Administrative Fees”). The Debtors rely
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 15 of 33
16
on UHC to process claims and ensure that the medical claims comply with the Medical Plans and
that the claimants are timely paid. The Debtors pay approximately $49,000 per month to UHC on
account of UHC Administrative Fees. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors owe approximately
$65,000 on account of UHC Administrative Fees.
36. In conjunction with the Medical Plans, the Debtors have purchased stop-loss
insurance through ReliaStar Life Insurance Company (“Voya”), which provides additional
protection against large claims made by Employees under the Medical Plans
(the “Stop-Loss Insurance”). Stop-Loss Insurance is an integral part of the Debtors’ management
of the risk of the self-insured Medical Plans and loss of the coverage would subject the Debtors to
undue risk. The Debtors pay approximately $108,000 per month to Voya in premiums for
Stop-Loss Insurance. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors owe approximately $144,000 on account
of Stop-Loss Insurance premiums.
b. Dental Plans
37. In addition to the Medical Plans, the Debtors offer Eligible Employees dental
coverage through two preferred provider option plans (collectively, the “Dental Plans”). The
Dental Plans are self-insured by the Debtors and administered by UHC. Participants in the Dental
Plans pay monthly premiums between approximately $17 and $74 depending on the level of
chosen coverage. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors fund claims made under the
Dental Plans on a weekly basis. The Debtors pay approximately $100,000 per month to provide
the dental benefits under the Dental Plans. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors owe approximately
$125,000 on account of dental claims (including incurred-but-not-reported claims) made under the
Dental Plans.
2. Vision Plans.
38. The Debtors offer Eligible Employees vision coverage through two plans
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 16 of 33
17
(collectively, the “Vision Plans”) fully insured by UHC. Participants in the Vision Plans pay
monthly premiums between approximately $4 and $14 depending on the level of chosen coverage.
In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors deduct the cost of the Vision Plan premiums from
the Employees’ Wages and remit such amounts directly to UHC.
39. Any amounts deducted by the Debtors but not yet remitted to UHC on account of
the Vision Plans have been included as Withholding Obligations. Out of an abundance of caution,
the Debtors seek authority to remit all outstanding prepetition amounts incurred on account of the
Vision Plans and to continue honoring their obligations under the Vision Plans on a postpetition
basis in the ordinary course of business consistent with their prepetition practices.
B. Life Insurance, AD&D, and Disability Coverage.
40. The Debtors offer the following insurance coverage to all Eligible Employees:
a. basic life insurance, in an amount calculated based on Employee seniority, paid entirely by the Debtors;
b. basic accidental death and dismemberment (“AD&D”) insurance, in an amount calculated based on Employee seniority, paid entirely by the Debtors;
c. short-and long-term disability insurance, paid entirely by the Debtors; and
d. supplemental life and AD&D insurance, in amount up to five times the Employee’s salary, paid entirely by the Employee.
41. These benefits (collectively, the “Life and Disability Coverage Benefits”) are
administered by Lincoln National Corporation. The average annual cost to the Debtors of
providing the Life and Disability Coverage Benefits is approximately $750,000, excluding
voluntary coverage products.
42. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that they owe approximately $87,000
on account of accrued but unpaid premiums related to the Life and Disability Coverage Benefits.
By this Motion, the Debtors seek authority to pay all outstanding prepetition amounts owed on
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 17 of 33
18
account of the Life and Disability Coverage Benefits and to continue honoring their obligations
under the Life and Disability Coverage Benefits on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of
business consistent with their prepetition practices.8
C. Accident, Critical Illness, and Hospital Indemnity Coverage.
43. The Debtors offer Eligible Employees the option to participate in accident
insurance coverage, critical illness insurance coverage, and hospital indemnity coverage programs
(the “ACIHI Coverage Programs”), paid entirely by the Employee. The ACIHI Coverage
Programs are provided and administered by Voya. Approximately 2,348 participants are enrolled
in the various ACIHI Coverage Programs and eligible Employees may enroll their legal spouse
and dependent children in their respective ACIHI Coverage Program(s).
44. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors deduct the cost of the premiums for
the ACIHI Coverage Programs from the Employees’ Wages and remit such amounts directly to
Voya. Any amounts deducted by the Debtors but not yet remitted to Voya on account of the ACIHI
Coverage Programs have been included as Withholding Obligations. Out of an abundance of
caution, the Debtors seek authority to remit all outstanding prepetition amounts incurred on
account of the ACIHI Coverage Programs and to continue honoring their obligations under the
ACIHI Coverage Programs on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business consistent
with their prepetition practices.
8 Any amounts deducted by the Debtors but not yet remitted to Lincoln National Corporation on account of the
supplemental life and AD&D insurance have been included as Withholding Obligations. Out of an abundance of caution, the Debtors seek authority to remit all outstanding prepetition amounts incurred on account of the supplemental life and AD&D insurance and to continue honoring their obligations under the Life and Disability Coverage Benefits on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business consistent with their prepetition practices.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 18 of 33
19
D. Workers’ Compensation and Other Insurance Programs.9
45. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors maintain workers’ compensation
insurance for their respective Employees at the statutorily required level for each state in which
the Debtors have Employees (collectively, the “Workers’ Compensation Program”). The Debtors
maintain a workers’ compensation policy with Sentry Insurance as part of the Workers’
Compensation Program (the “Workers’ Compensation Insurance Policy”).
46. The Debtors must continue claim assessment, determination, adjudication, and
payment pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Program, without regard to whether such
liabilities are outstanding before the Petition Date, to ensure that the Debtors comply with
applicable workers’ compensation laws and requirements. There are currently 25 active open
claims under the Workers’ Compensation Program.
47. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate they owe approximately $2.05 million
on account of prepetition claims under the Workers’ Compensation Program. By this Motion, the
Debtors seek authority to (a) lift the automatic stay to permit Employees to proceed with their
claims under the Workers’ Compensation Program in the appropriate judicial or administrative
forum, (b) pay all outstanding prepetition amounts owed on account of the Workers’
Compensation Program, and (c) maintain the Workers’ Compensation Program and continue to
honor their obligations thereunder on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business
consistent with their prepetition practices.
9 In addition to the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Policy described herein, the Debtors maintain numerous
insurance policies. These policies are described, and relief is requested with respect to such policies, in the Debtors’ Emergency Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to (A) Continue Insurance Coverage Entered Into Prepetition and Satisfy Prepetition Obligations Related Thereto, (B) Renew, Amend, Supplement, Extend, or Purchase Insurance Policies, and (C) Continue the Surety Bond Program, and (II) Granting Related Relief, filed contemporaneously herewith and incorporated herein by reference.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 19 of 33
20
V. Paid Time Off Benefits.
48. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors provide paid time off to certain
eligible Employees as a benefit (the “Paid Time Off Benefits”). The Paid Time Off Benefits
provide eligible Employees with the flexibility to plan for vacation, personal and family illness,
doctors’ appointments, and other activities. When an Employee elects to use Paid Time Off
Benefits, that Employee is paid his or her regular hourly or salaried rate. Paid Time Off Benefits
generally accrue at specified rates up to a maximum amount based on the applicable state limit, if
any. Accruals of Paid Time Off Benefits, however, are not a current cash payment obligation.
49. Over the past 12 months, the Debtors paid approximately $1.05 million
in the aggregate in Paid Time Off Benefits. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that
approximately $700,000 in Paid Time Off Benefits have accrued. By this Motion, the Debtors
seek authority, but not direction, to pay any “cash out” amounts required under applicable law with
respect to earned but unused Paid Time Off Benefits and to continue Paid Time Off Benefits on a
postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business consistent with their prepetition practices.
VI. Deferred Compensation Plan.
50. The Debtors maintain a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for the benefit
of certain Employees and former employees (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). The Deferred
Compensation Plan provides certain participating Employees with the opportunity to defer
payment of certain earned compensation amounts, thereby deferring the associated income tax
obligations until a future date. The Deferred Compensation Plan is administered by Newport Group,
Inc., and Reliance Trust Company holds a portion of each participating Employee’s compensation
(the “Deferred Compensation Assets”) in a “rabbi trust” for future disbursement upon the
Employee’s direction. There are approximately 107 participants in the Deferred Compensation
Plan, approximately 87 of which are current Employees.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 20 of 33
21
51. The Deferred Compensation Assets total approximately $5.3 million and are
subject to substantial restrictions, including, without limitation, that in the event of the Debtors’
insolvency, the trustee must preserve such assets for the benefit of the Debtors’ general
creditors. In the absence of these restrictions, eligible Employees would have been required to
include the amount of any contributions to the rabbi trust on their behalf (as well as any interest or
other earnings accrued on such contributed amounts) in their gross taxable income in the year in
which the contributions were made and/or the interest was accrued. See McAllister v. Resolution
Trust Corp., 201 F.3d 570, 572-73, 575 (5th Cir. 2000). Certain of the participants in the Deferred
Compensation Plan have substantial plan balances (i.e., approximately one quarter of the
Participants have a plan balance of approximately $50,000 or more).
52. The Debtors’ failure to honor their Deferred Compensation Plan obligations could
result in a severe strain on the Debtors’ relationship with their Employees and may jeopardize the
Debtors’ ability to conduct business as usual during these chapter 11 cases. Increased instability
in the Debtors’ workforce will only undermine the Debtors’ ability to strengthen their financial
and operational foundation, to generate growth, and to be positioned for long-term success. By this
Motion, the Debtors seek authority to maintain the Deferred Compensation Plan and to honor their
obligations under the Deferred Compensation Plan in the ordinary course of business on a
postpetition basis.
VII. Non-Insider Severance.
53. The Debtors maintain a severance program in the ordinary course of business for
certain of their non-insider Employees (the “Non-Insider Severance Program”). Pursuant to the
Non-Insider Severance Program, certain former employees may receive bi-weekly payment(s)
after their employment is terminated based on the Employee’s salary, job level, or their time of
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 21 of 33
22
service with the Debtors prior to termination.10
54. The Debtors believe the Non-Insider Severance Program has been critical to
maintaining Employee morale, loyalty, and stability, and paying the obligations related to the
Non-Insider Severance Program is vital to their businesses. The Debtors’ failure to honor their
Non-Insider Severance Program obligations and continue the Non-Insider Severance Program
postpetition could result in a severe strain on the Debtors’ relationship with their Employees, and
may jeopardize the Debtors’ ability to conduct business as usual during these chapter 11 cases.
Increased instability in the Debtors’ workforce will only undermine the Debtors’ ability to
strengthen their financial and operational foundation, to generate growth, and to be positioned for
long-term success.
55. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that they owe approximately $73,000
in accrued but unpaid obligations under the Non-Insider Severance Program. By this Motion, the
Debtors seek authority, but not direction: (a) to satisfy any accrued but unpaid prepetition
obligations on account of the Non-Insider Severance Program; (b) to continue the Non-Insider
Severance Program with regard to any former employees participating in the Non-Insider
10 In addition to the Non-Insider Severance Program, the Company also maintains a severance program in the
ordinary course of business for certain non-Insider Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees, including, among others, employees of iQor Global Services de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (“iQor Mexico” and, such non-Insider severance program, the “Non-Insider Foreign Severance Program”). Pursuant to the Non-Insider Foreign Severance Program, certain Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees may receive a payment following termination of their employment based on, among other things, statutory severance requirements, their salary, job level, and their time of service with the Company prior to termination. As set forth in the Cash Management Motion, in order to facilitate the Company’s global funding needs, Debtor iQor US Inc. routinely transfers funds to various bank accounts maintained by certain of the Debtors’ foreign non-Debtor affiliates, including iQor Mexico. Absent these intercompany transactions, these foreign non-Debtor affiliates would be unable to satisfy their ordinary course operating expenses, including obligations owed to Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees, as the intercompany transactions account for these entities’ sole source of revenue and operating cash. The Non-Insider Foreign Severance Program is critical to maintaining morale and stability among iQor Mexico’s workforce, and paying the obligations related to the Non-Insider Foreign Severance Program is vital to the Company’s businesses. As of the Petition Date, the Company estimates that approximately $1,200,000 in Non-Insider Foreign Severance Program obligations have accrued. As noted above, the Debtors highlight these non-Debtor employee obligations for the purpose of transparency and are not requesting authority by this Motion to continue funding the Non-Insider Foreign Severance Program, but are requesting such relief in the Cash Management Motion.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 22 of 33
23
Severance Program; and (c) to continue the Non-Insider Severance Program for all eligible
Employees on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of business consistent with their
prepetition practices. For the avoidance of doubt, the Debtors do not request authorization to
continue the Non-Insider Severance Program with regard to any Insider.
Basis for Relief
I. Sufficient Cause Exists to Authorize the Debtors to Honor the Compensation and Benefits.
A. Certain Compensation and Benefits Are Entitled to Priority Treatment.
56. Sections 507(a)(4) and 507(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code entitle certain of the
Compensation and Benefits owed to the Employees to priority treatment. As priority claims, the
Debtors are required to pay these claims in full to confirm a chapter 11 plan. See 11 U.S.C.
§ 1129(a)(9)(b) (requiring payment of certain allowed unsecured claims for: (a) wages, salaries,
or commissions, including sick leave pay earned by an individual; and (b) contributions to an
employee benefit plan). Thus, granting the relief sought herein should only affect the timing of
certain payments to the Employees, and should not negatively affect recoveries for general
unsecured creditors. Indeed, the Debtors submit that payment of the Compensation and Benefits
at this time enhances value for the benefit of all interested parties. See In re Equalnet Commc’ns
Corp., 258 B.R. 368, 370 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2000) (“The need to pay [employee wage] claims in
an ordinary course of business time frame is simple common sense. Employees are more likely to
stay in place and to refrain from actions which could be detrimental to the case and/or the estate if
their pay and benefits remain intact and uninterrupted.”).
B. Payment of Certain Compensation and Benefits Is Required by Law.
57. The Debtors seek authority to pay the applicable Withholding Obligations to the
appropriate third-party entities. These amounts principally represent Employee earnings that
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 23 of 33
24
governments, Employees, and judicial authorities have designated for deduction from the
Employees’ paychecks. Indeed, certain Withholding Obligations are not property of the Debtors’
estates because the Debtors have withheld such amounts from the Employees’ paychecks on
another party’s behalf. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 541(b)(1), (d); see also In re Equalnet Commc’ns,
258 B.R. at 370 (noting that, for tax obligations where funds are held by the debtor in trust, “the
legal right to payment of such claims at any time appears irrefutable”) (citing In re Al Copeland
Enter., Inc., 991 F.2d 233 (5th Cir. 1993)).
58. Further, federal and state laws require the Debtors to withhold certain tax payments
from the Employees’ paychecks and to pay such amounts to the appropriate taxing authority.
26 U.S.C. §§ 6672, 7501(a); see also City of Farrell v. Sharon Steel Corp., 41 F.3d 92, 95–97
(3d Cir. 1994) (finding that state law requiring a corporate debtor to withhold city income tax from
its employees’ wages created a trust relationship between debtor and the city for payment of
withheld income taxes). Because the Withholding Obligations may not be property of the Debtors’
estates, the Debtors request that the Court authorize them to transmit the Withholding Obligations
on account of the Employees to the proper parties in the ordinary course of business.
59. Similarly, state laws require the Debtors to maintain the Workers’ Compensation
Program. If the Debtors fail to maintain the Workers’ Compensation Program, state laws may
prohibit the Debtors from operating in those states. Payment of all Workers’ Compensation
Program amounts is therefore crucial to the Debtors’ continued operations and the success of the
Debtors’ ongoing chapter 11 process.
II. Payment of the Compensation and Benefits Is Proper Pursuant to Section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.
60. Courts in the Fifth Circuit have recognized that it is appropriate to authorize the
payment of prepetition obligations where necessary to protect and preserve the estate, including
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 24 of 33
25
an operating business’s going-concern value. See, e.g., In re CoServ, L.L.C., 273 B.R. 487, 497
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2002) (authorizing payment of certain prepetition claims pursuant to “doctrine
of necessity”); Equalnet Commc’ns, 258 B.R. at 369–70 (business transactions critical to the
survival of the business of the debtor are exceptions to the general rule of nonpayment of
prepetition claims prior to plan confirmation); see also In re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc., 98 B.R. 174,
175 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1989) (“The ability of a Bankruptcy Court to authorize the payment of
pre-petition debt when such payment is needed to facilitate the rehabilitation of the debtor is not a
novel concept.”); In re James A. Phillips, Inc., 29 B.R. 391, 398 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). In doing so,
these courts acknowledge that several legal theories rooted in sections 105(a), 363(b), and 1107(a)
of the Bankruptcy Code support the payment of prepetition claims as provided herein.
61. Section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code permits a debtor, subject to court approval,
to pay prepetition obligations where a sound business purpose exists for doing so. See Ionosphere
Clubs, 98 B.R. at 175 (noting that section 363(b) provides “broad flexibility” to authorize a debtor
to honor prepetition claims where supported by an appropriate business justification). In addition,
under section 1107(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor in possession has, among other things, the
“implied duty of the debtor-in-possession to ‘protect and preserve the estate, including an
operating business’ going-concern value.’” In re CEI Roofing, Inc., 315 B.R. 50, 59 (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. 2004) (quoting CoServ, 273 B.R. at 497). Moreover, under section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy
Code, “the Court may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to
carry out the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.” 11 U.S.C. § 105(a); CoServ, 273 B.R. at 497
(finding that sections 105 and 1107 of the Bankruptcy Code provide the authority for a debtor-in-
possession to pay prepetition claims); CEI Roofing, 315 B.R. at 60 (finding that “[b]ecause
Congress has specifically provided that prepetition wage claims up to a certain amount per claim
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 25 of 33
26
be elevated to priority status under § 503(1)(3)” the court’s job is easier when it considers approval
of such prepetition claims); In re Mirant Corp., 296 B.R. 427, 429 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2003)
(noting that non-payment of prepetition claims may seriously damage a debtor’s business). The
above-referenced sections of the Bankruptcy Code therefore authorize the postpetition payment of
prepetition claims when the payments are critical to preserving the going-concern value of the
debtor’s estate, as is the case here. See, e.g., CoServ, 273 B.R. at 497 (“[I]t is only logical that the
bankruptcy court be able to use [s]ection 105(a) of the [Bankruptcy] Code to authorize satisfaction
of the pre-petition claim in aid of preservation or enhancement of the estate.”).
62. The Debtors submit that the relief requested herein is warranted under this authority
and the facts of these chapter 11 cases. Paying prepetition compensation, benefits, and similar
obligations will benefit the Debtors’ estates and their creditors by allowing the Debtors’ business
operations to continue without interruption. Although the PEO Employee Obligations and certain
Temporary Staff Obligations are paid to third-party staffing agencies that then remit payment to
the applicable workers, that payment is vital to the continued engagement of the PEO Employees
and the Temporary Staff, who are critical to the Debtors’ business operations.
63. Without the relief requested herein, Employees, Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees,
PEO Employees, or Temporary Staff may seek alternative employment opportunities, perhaps with
the Debtors’ competitors. That would deplete the Debtors’ workforce, thereby hindering the
Debtors’ ability to operate their business. Additionally, significantly all of the value of the
Debtors’ business is tied to their workforce, which cannot easily be replaced without significant
efforts. The loss of valuable employees and resulting need to recruit new personnel (and the costs
attendant thereto) would be distracting at this crucial time when the Debtors need to focus on
stabilizing their business operations. Enterprise value may be materially impaired to the detriment
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 26 of 33
27
of all stakeholders in that scenario. There can be no doubt that the Debtors must do their utmost
to retain their workforce by, among other things, continuing to honor all wage, benefits, and related
obligations, including the prepetition Compensation and Benefits. Honoring prepetition and
postpetition obligations under the Non-Insider Severance Program and the Deferred Compensation
Plan is similarly important to sustain morale for the current Employees and promote their
continued retention.
64. In addition, the majority of Employees and Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees rely
exclusively on the Compensation and Benefits to satisfy their daily living expenses. Consequently,
Employees and Non-Debtor Affiliate Employees will be exposed to significant financial
difficulties if the Debtors are not permitted to honor their obligations related thereto. Failure to
satisfy these obligations will jeopardize morale and loyalty at a time when Employee and
Temporary Staff support is critical to the Debtors’ business. If the Court does not authorize the
Debtors to honor their various obligations under the benefit and insurance programs described
herein, Employees will not receive health coverage and, thus, may be obligated to pay certain
healthcare claims that the Debtors have not satisfied. The loss of healthcare coverage will result
in considerable anxiety for Employees (and likely attrition) at a time when the Debtors need these
Employees to perform their jobs at peak efficiency. Additionally, as set forth above, Employee
attrition would cause the Debtors to incur additional expenses to find appropriate and experienced
replacements, severely disrupting the Debtors’ operations at this critical juncture.
65. The Debtors request that the Court authorize the Debtors to pay and continue the
Compensation and Benefits in the ordinary course of business and consistent with their prepetition
practices.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 27 of 33
28
III. A Limited Waiver of the Automatic Stay for the Workers’ Compensation Program Is Appropriate in this Case.
66. Section 362(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code operates to stay:
[T]he commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title . . . .
67. Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, however, permits a debtor or other parties
in interest to request a modification or termination of the automatic stay for “cause.”
11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1).
68. The Debtors seek authorization, under section 362(d) of the Bankruptcy Code, to
permit their Employees to proceed with their claims against the Workers’ Compensation Program
in the appropriate judicial or administrative forum. The Debtors believe that cause exists to modify
the automatic stay because staying the Employees’ workers’ compensation claims could have a
detrimental effect on the financial well-being and morale of the Employees and lead to the
departure of certain Employees who are critical at this juncture. Such departures could cause a
severe disruption in the Debtors’ business to the detriment of all stakeholders. In addition, as noted
above, if the Debtors fail to maintain the Workers’ Compensation Program, state laws may prohibit
the Debtors from operating in those states. The Debtors request a limited waiver of the automatic
stay for purposes of allowing the Debtors’ Workers’ Compensation Program to proceed.
Processing of Checks and Electronic Fund Transfers Should be Authorized
69. The Debtors have sufficient funds to pay the amounts described in this Motion in
the ordinary course of business by virtue of expected cash flows from ongoing business operations
and anticipated access to cash collateral. In addition, under the Debtors’ existing cash management
system, the Debtors can readily identify checks or wire transfer requests as relating to an authorized
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 28 of 33
29
payment in respect of the relief requested herein. The Debtors believe that checks or wire transfer
requests, other than those relating to authorized payments, will not be honored inadvertently. The
Debtors request that the Court authorize and direct all applicable financial institutions, when
requested by the Debtors, to receive, process, honor, and pay any and all checks or wire transfer
requests in respect of the relief requested in this Motion.
Emergency Consideration
70. Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 6003, which empowers a court to grant relief within
the first 21 days after the commencement of a chapter 11 case “to the extent that relief is necessary
to avoid immediate and irreparable harm,” the Debtors request emergency consideration of this
Motion. The Debtors believe an immediate and orderly transition into chapter 11 is critical to the
viability of their operations and that any delay in granting the relief requested could hinder the
Debtors’ operations and cause irreparable harm. The failure to receive the requested relief during
the first 21 days of these chapter 11 cases would severely disrupt the Debtors’ operations at this
critical juncture and imperil the Debtors’ restructuring. The Debtors have satisfied the “immediate
and irreparable harm” standard of Bankruptcy Rule 6003 and request that the Court approve the
relief requested in this Motion on an emergency basis.
Waiver of Bankruptcy Rules 6004(a) and 6004(h)
71. To implement the foregoing successfully, the Debtors request that the Court enter
an order providing that notice of the relief requested herein satisfies Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a) and
that the Debtors have established cause to exclude this relief from the 14-day stay period under
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).
Reservation of Rights
72. Nothing contained herein or any actions taken pursuant to such relief requested is
intended or shall be construed as: (a) an admission as to the amount of, basis for, or validity of
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 29 of 33
30
any claim against a Debtor entity under the Bankruptcy Code or other applicable nonbankruptcy
law; (b) a waiver of the Debtors’ or any other party in interest’s right to dispute any claim on any
grounds; (c) a promise or requirement to pay any claim; (d) an implication or admission that any
particular claim is of a type specified or defined in this Motion or any order granting the relief
requested by this Motion or a finding that any particular claim is an administrative expense claim
or other priority claim; (e) a request or authorization to assume, adopt, or reject any agreement,
contract, or lease pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code; (f) an admission as to the
validity, priority, enforceability, or perfection of any lien on, security interest in, or other
encumbrance on property of the Debtors’ estates; (g) a waiver or limitation of the Debtors’, or any
other party in interest’s, rights under the Bankruptcy Code or any other applicable law; or (h) a
concession by the Debtors that any liens (contractual, common law, statutory, or otherwise) that
may be satisfied pursuant to the relief requested in this Motion are valid, and the rights of all parties
in interest are expressly reserved to contest the extent, validity, or perfection or seek avoidance of
all such liens. If the Court grants the relief sought herein, any payment made pursuant to the
Court’s order is not intended and should not be construed as an admission as to the validity of any
particular claim or a waiver of the Debtors’ or any other party in interest’s rights to subsequently
dispute the claim.
Notice
73. The Debtors will provide notice of this Motion to the following parties or their
respective counsel, as applicable: (a) the United States Trustee for the Southern District of Texas;
(b) the holders of the 30 largest unsecured claims against the Debtors (on a consolidated basis);
(c) the administrative agent under the Debtors’ prepetition priority term loan credit facility and
prepetition first lien term loan credit facility, and counsel thereto; (d) the administrative agent
under the Debtors’ second lien term loan credit facility, and counsel thereto; (e) the accounts
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 30 of 33
31
receivable facility lender, and counsel thereto; (f) counsel to the ad hoc group of term loan lenders;
(g) the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas; (h) the Internal Revenue
Service; (i) the attorneys general for the states in which the Debtors operate; (j) ADP; (k) Voya;
(l) UHC; and (m) any party that has requested notice pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002. The
Debtors submit that, in light of the nature of the relief requested, no other or further notice need
be given.
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 31 of 33
WHEREFORE, the Debtors respectfully request that the Court enter an order granting the relief
requested in this Motion and such other and further relief as is appropriate under the circumstances.
Houston, Texas September 10, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Matthew D. Cavenaugh JACKSON WALKER L.L.P. KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Matthew D. Cavenaugh (TX Bar No. 24062656) KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP Jennifer F. Wertz (TX Bar No. 24072822) Christopher Marcus, P.C. (pro hac vice admission pending) Genevieve M. Graham (TX Bar No. 24085340) Rachael M. Bazinski (pro hac vice admission pending) Vienna F. Anaya (TX Bar No. 24091225) 601 Lexington Avenue 1401 McKinney Street, Suite 1900 New York, New York 10022 Houston, Texas 77010 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Telephone: (713) 752-4200 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 Facsimile: (713) 752-4221 Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Proposed Co-Counsel to the Debtors Proposed Co-Counsel to the Debtors and Debtors in Possession and Debtors in Possession
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 32 of 33
Certificate of Accuracy
I certify that the foregoing statements are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. This statement is being made pursuant to Local Rule 9013-1(i).
/s/ Matthew D. Cavenaugh Matthew D. Cavenaugh
Certificate of Service
I certify that on September 10, 2020, I caused a copy of the foregoing document to be served by the Electronic Case Filing System for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas.
/s/ Matthew D. Cavenaugh Matthew D. Cavenaugh
Case 20-34500 Document 27 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 33 of 33
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) IQOR HOLDINGS INC., et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-34500 (DRJ) ) Debtors. ) (Joint Administration Requested) ) ) Re: Docket No. __
ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (A) PAY PREPETITION WAGES, SALARIES, OTHER
COMPENSATION, AND REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES AND (B) CONTINUE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PROGRAMS, AND (II) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF
Upon the motion (the “Motion”)2 of the above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession
(collectively, the “Debtors”) for entry of an order (this “Order”), (a) authorizing, but not directing,
the Debtors to (i) pay prepetition wages, salaries, other compensation, reimbursable employee
expenses, and non-insider severance obligations, and (ii) continue compensation and benefits
programs in the ordinary course, including payment of certain prepetition obligations related
thereto, and (b) granting related relief; all as more fully set forth in the Motion; and upon the First
Day Declaration; and this Court having jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334;
and this Court having found that this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and that
this Court may enter a final order consistent with Article III of the United States Constitution; and
this Court having found that venue of this proceeding and the Motion in this district is proper
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and this Court having found that the relief requested in
1 A complete list of each of the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’
proposed claims and noticing agent at https://omniagentsolutions.com/iqor. The location of the Debtors’ service address is: 200 Central Avenue, 7th Floor, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701.
2 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.
Case 20-34500 Document 27-1 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 1 of 5
2
the Motion is in the best interests of the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and other parties in
interest; and this Court having found that the Debtors’ notice of the Motion and opportunity for a
hearing on the Motion were appropriate under the circumstances and no other notice need be
provided; and this Court having reviewed the Motion and having heard the statements in support
of the relief requested therein at a hearing before this Court (the “Hearing”); and this Court having
determined that the legal and factual bases set forth in the Motion and at the Hearing establish just
cause for the relief granted herein; and upon all of the proceedings had before this Court; and after
due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Debtors are authorized, but not directed, to continue to administer and/or
modify, change, or discontinue the Compensation and Benefits in accordance with prepetition
practices, and to honor and pay any claims or obligations on account of the Compensation and
Benefits, irrespective of whether such obligations arose prepetition or postpetition, and without
the need for further Court approval, subject to applicable law; provided that the Debtors shall not
honor any prepetition claims or obligations on account of Compensation and Benefits to any
individual that exceed the priority amounts set forth in sections 507(a)(4) and 507(a)(5) of the
Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors provide shall provide notice to the U.S. Trustee and any statutory
committee appointed in these chapter 11 cases of any material changes or modifications to
Compensation and Benefits and any new employee compensation or benefit plans or programs.
2. For the avoidance of doubt, the Debtors are authorized to continue the Deferred
Compensation Plan in the ordinary course of business on a postpetition basis, and to honor their
prepetition and postpetition obligations under the Deferred Compensation Plan.
3. Nothing herein shall be deemed to authorize the payment of any amounts to any
“insider” pursuant to any bonus, incentive, retention, or severance plan that violate or implicate
Case 20-34500 Document 27-1 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 2 of 5
3
section 503(c) of the Bankruptcy Code; provided that nothing in this Order shall prejudice the
Debtors’ ability to seek approval of relief pursuant to section 503(c) of the Bankruptcy Code at a
later time.
4. Pursuant to section 362(d) of the Bankruptcy Code: (a) Employees are authorized
to proceed with their workers’ compensation claims in the appropriate judicial or administrative
forum under the Workers’ Compensation Program, and the Debtors are authorized to pay all
prepetition amounts relating thereto in the ordinary course of business; and (b) the notice
requirements pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 4001(d) with respect to clause (a) are waived.
This modification of the automatic stay pertains solely to claims under the Workers’ Compensation
Program and any such claims must be pursued in accordance with the applicable Workers’
Compensation Program. Payment on account of any recoveries obtained in connection with a
claim brought pursuant to this paragraph is limited to the terms and conditions of the applicable
Workers’ Compensation Program, including with regard to any policy limits or caps.
5. Notwithstanding the relief granted herein and any actions taken pursuant to such
relief, nothing in this Order shall be deemed: (a) an admission as to the validity of any prepetition
claim, interest, or lien against a Debtor entity; (b) a waiver of the Debtors’ or any other party in
interest’s rights to dispute any prepetition claim, interest, or lien on any grounds; (c) a promise or
requirement to pay prepetition claims; (d) a waiver of the obligation of any party in interest to file
a proof of claim; (e) an implication or admission that any particular claim, interest, or lien is of a
type specified or defined in the Motion or any order granting the relief requested by the Motion;
(f) a request or authorization to assume any prepetition agreement, contract, or lease pursuant to
section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code; (g) a waiver of the Debtors’ or any other party in interest’s
rights under the Bankruptcy Code or any other applicable law; or (h) a concession by the Debtors
Case 20-34500 Document 27-1 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 3 of 5
4
that any liens (contractual, common law, statutory, or otherwise) that may be satisfied pursuant to
the relief granted in this Order are valid, and the rights of all parties in interest are expressly
reserved to contest the extent, validity, or perfection or seek avoidance of all such liens.
6. The banks and financial institutions on which checks were drawn or electronic
payment requests made in payment of the prepetition obligations approved herein are authorized
to receive, process, honor, and pay all such checks and electronic payment requests when presented
for payment, and all such banks and financial institutions are authorized to rely on the Debtors’
designation of any particular check or electronic payment request as approved by this Order.
7. The Debtors are authorized to issue postpetition checks, or to effect postpetition
fund transfer requests, in replacement of any checks or fund transfer requests that are dishonored
as a consequence of these chapter 11 cases with respect to prepetition amounts owed in connection
with the relief granted herein.
8. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Order, any payment made or action
taken by any of the Debtors pursuant to the authority granted in this Order shall be subject to any
interim or final order entered by the Court approving the Debtors’ use of cash collateral and/or the
Debtors’ entry into any postpetition financing facilities or credit agreements, and any budgets in
connection therewith governing any such postpetition financing and/or use of cash collateral
(each such order, a “DIP Order”). To the extent there is any inconsistency between the terms of
the DIP Order and this Order, the terms of the DIP Order shall control.
9. The contents of the Motion satisfy the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 6003(b).
10. Notice of the Motion as provided therein shall be deemed good and sufficient notice
of the Motion and the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a) and the Bankruptcy Local Rules
are satisfied by such notice.
Case 20-34500 Document 27-1 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 4 of 5
5
11. Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), the terms and conditions of this Order
are immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry.
12. The Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the relief
granted in this Order in accordance with the Motion.
13. This Court retains exclusive jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or
related to the implementation, interpretation, and enforcement of this Order.
Dated: __________, 2020 Houston, Texas UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Case 20-34500 Document 27-1 Filed in TXSB on 09/10/20 Page 5 of 5