in oxalate, EDTA

6

Transcript of in oxalate, EDTA

Page 1: in oxalate, EDTA

Maataloustieteellinen A ikakauskirjaVol. 61: 73—78, 1989

Extractable aluminium, iron and manganese in mineral soils1 Dependence of extractability on the pH of oxalate, pyrophosphateand EDTA extractants

RAINA NISKANEN

University of Helsinki, Department of Agricultural Chemistry,SF-00710 Helsinki, Finland

Abstract. Al, Fe and Mn in two mineral soils were extracted by 0.05 M and 0.02 M oxalateand pyrophosphate and 0.02 M EDTA solutions the pH of which was adjusted to values rangingfrom 1.7 to II .0. The extractability of metals tended to decrease as the pH rose and as thedeprotonation of extractant acid, expressed as pKa values, progressed. The reduction in ex-tractability of metals by oxalate was rather steep at pH > 4, whereas the extractability bypyrophosphateremained moderate at a wider pH range. The extractability of metals by EDTA(pH 3.6—7.3) was lower than that by oxalate and pyrophosphate. Extractability was lowerin the absence of the studied oxyacid anions and with 0.01 M KCI as the supporting electrolyteat apH between 2 and 11 than in their presence.

Index words: amorphous Al, Fe and Mn, acetate-extractable Al, complexing agents, protolysis constants, soil extraction

Introduction

The removal of aluminium, iron and man-ganese from soil by solutions of weak acidanions and the adsorption of these anions onsoil oxides are based on complexation reac-tions. At low concentrationanions are sorbedon oxides; at high concentration they act asextractants of oxides. The ability of weak acidanions to form metal complexes depends onthe form of anions, which in turn dependsupon pH. Inflexions in the adsorption ’enve-lopes’ of w ak acid anions occur in the vicinity

of pHs corresponding to pK a values of acidat issue (Kingston et al. 1967, 1968). The ex-tractability of amorphous aluminium, ironand manganese oxides from soil by solutionsof weak acid anions is seldom studied as afunction of the extractant pH. In a previousstudy (Niskanen 1989), the release of soilaluminium and iron by fluoride strongly in-creased as the pH of the extractant solutiondecreased. The aim of thispaper was to studythe effect of the extractant pH on the disso-

73

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE IN FINLAND

Page 2: in oxalate, EDTA

Table I. Soil samples.

Fine sand Sand

Sampling depth, cm o—2o 20—40P H(CaCI2 ) 5.1 4.6Organic C, % 3.6 0.8Particle-size distribution:<2 urn, % 13 2

2—20 urn, % 20 I20—60 urn, Wo 27 760—200 urn, % 31 35>2OO urn, «It 9 56

Tamm's acid ammoniumoxalate-solubleAl mmol/kg soil 186 104Fe mmol/kg soil 53 32Mn umol/kg soil 2 200 5300.1 M Na4 P 207 -solubleAl mmol/kg soil («It of Tamm'soxalate-soluble) 92 (49) 54 (52)Fe mmol/kg soil (It of Tamm'soxalate-soluble) 23 (44) 10 (30)Mn umol/kg soil («It of Tamm'soxalate-soluble) 2 280(103) 110(21)

1 M ammonium acetate-solubleAl mmol/kg soil («It of Tamm'soxalate-soluble) 6 (3) 10 (9)

lution of aluminium, iron and manganesefrom soil by solutionsof anions of three oxy-acids commonly used in soil research.

Material and methods

The material consisted of a fine sand samplefrom the surface layer of a cultivated soil(South Karelia, Imatra) and a sand soil samplefrom a deeper layer of virgin soil (Viikki Ex-perimental Farm, University of Helsinki)

(Table 1). The samples were air-dried andground to pass through a 2-mm sieve. The pHof the soil was measured in a soil-0.01 MCaCl 2 suspension (1:2.5 v/v) (Ryti 1965).The organic carbon content of the soil wasdetermined by a modified (Graham 1948)Alten wet combustion method, the particle-size distribution by the pipette method(Elonen 1971).

The extraction methods for soil aluminium,iron and manganese are given in Table 2. Ex-tractions I—31 —3 were used as reference methods.The effect of pH on extractability was studiedby using dilute oxalate, pyrophosphate andEDTA solutions. The pK a values of the acidsare given in Table 3. Acid oxalate solutionswere prepared from oxalic acid and ammoni-um oxalate, basic oxalate solutions from am-monium oxalate by adjusting the pH with 5 %

NH 4OH. The pH of K 4P207 solutions wasadjusted with 5 M HCI and NaOH, the pHof EDTA solutions with CH 3 COOH andNaOH. It was not possible to prepare EDTAsolutions with pH <3.6 because at a lowerpH the H2-EDTA of low solubility precipi-tated. Extractability without anions of oxy-acids was studied by using KCI solutions, thepH of which was adjusted with 5 M HCI andNaOH. The pH of soil-solution suspensionswas measured before and after shaking.

Aluminium, iron and manganese in filtrateswere determined by atomic absorption spec-trophotometry, Fe and Mn with air-acetyleneflame and A 1 with N,O-acetylene flame. Theexperiment was carried out in duplicate.

Table 2. Extraction methods.

Extractant pH Extraction Shaking Referenceratio, w/v time, h

1. 0.18 M ammonium oxalate,0.10 M oxalic acid 3.3 1:20 2 Tamm 1922

2. 0.1 M Na 4 P 207 10.0 1:20 4 McKeacue 19673. 1 M ammonium acetate 4.8 1:10 2 McLean et al. 1958

4. 0.05 M oxalate 1.7—9.7 1:200 35. 0.02 M oxalate 2.0—8.4 1:100 36. 0.05 M K 4P 207 2.4—11.0 1:100 37. 0.02 M K 4P 207 2.5—10.1 1:100 38. 0.02 M Na 2-EDTA 3.6—7.3 1:100 39. 0.01 M KCI 2.3—11.1 1:100 3

74

Page 3: in oxalate, EDTA

Table 3. pK, values of oxalic, pyrophosphoric and ethy-lenediamine tetraacetic acids (Martbll and Calvin 1956,Anon. 1984).

Acid pK, pK 2 pK, pK4

Oxalic 1.24.20.91.5 5.88.2Pyrophosphoric

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic 2.02.7 6.210.3

Results and discussion

The removal of metals by 0.05 M oxalatedecreased as the pH increased, the reductionin extractability being rather steep at pH > 4(Figs. I—3).1 —3). The minimum extractability ofaluminium was measured when pH was about9 (Fig. 1). At low pH, 0.05 M oxalate ex-tracted more metals than did Tamm’s oxalate.The pH at which the removal of metals wasequal to the extractability by Tamm’s oxalatediffered to some extent in both soils, beingabout 4 for aluminium and iron in fine sandsoil and about 4.5 for those in sand soil (Figs.I—2). The removal of manganese by 0.05 Mand Tamm’s oxalate was equal at pH 4.3(fine sand) and 2.0 (sand) (Fig. 3).

The 0.02 M oxalate was a less efficient ex-tractant than 0.05 M oxalate (Figs. I—3). Theextractability of iron in fine sand soil by0.02 M oxalate was at the highest only 80 %

of Tamm’s oxalate-extractable iron (Fig. 2).As pH rose, the decrease in the extracta-

bility of metals by K 4P207 sloped more gentlythan with oxalate extraction (Figs. I—3). Ascompared to oxalate, the extracting ability ofpyrophosphate remained moderate at a widerpH range. The iron extracted by 0.05 MK 4P 207 at pH 10 did not deviate much fromthat extracted by 0.1 M Na4P2 07, whereasmore aluminium was extracted from sand soilby 0.05 M K 4P 2 O v than by 0.1 M Na4P 207 .

The efficiency of 0.02 M K 4P 207 as the ex-tractant was less than that of 0.05 M K 4P 2 07 .

As compared to oxalate and pyrophosphateextraction, the extractability of aluminiumand iron by 0.02 M EDTA was lower (Figs.I—2). The extractability was nearly un-changed in the pH range of 5—7; outside thisrange it slightly increased (Figs. I—2).1 —2). In thestudied pH range, the extractability ofaluminium by EDTA was not much higherthan that by ammonium acetate at pH 4.8(Table 1). The solubility of iron by EDTA was

Fig. I. Extractability of aluminium (% of Tamm’s oxalate-extractable Al) versus extractant pH

75

Page 4: in oxalate, EDTA

less than 10 % of that by Tamm’s oxalate(Fig. 2). The extractability of manganese infine sand soil by EDTA decreased as the pHincreased, whereas no manganese was ex-tracted from sand soil (Fig. 3).

In the absence of oxyacid anions and with0.01 M KCI as supporting electrolyte, the solu-bility of metals was lower than in the presenceof those anions (Figs. I—3).1 —3). An increasingH + concentration in the KCI solution en-hanced the dissolution of metals as a result ofthe formation of aquocations in a reversehydrolysis reaction. Aluminium and man-ganese in fine sand soil were solubilized morereadily than iron (Figs. I—3).1 —3). The method forthe selective extraction of ‘active’ aluminiumoxides by 0.5 M CaCl2 at pH 1.5 used byTweneboah et al. (1967) is actually based onthis different solubility of aluminium and ironat low pH.

An increasing OH concentration enhancedthe release of metals. The extractability ofaluminium and iron in fine sand soil by0.01 M KCI increased when the pH exceeded8, that of manganese when the pH exceeded10 (Figs. I—3).1 —3). The release ofaluminium by

0.05 M oxalate increased when the pH exceededabout 9 (Fig. 1).

Oxalic, pyrophosphoric and ethylenedia-mine tetraacetic acids are di- and tetraproticacids the pK a values of which are given inTable 3. According to the theory of Hinostonet al. (1967, 1968), the adsorption ‘envelopes’of anions of these acids should have a maxi-mum at a pH that corresponds to pK,.Thereafter the ‘envelopes’ should have adecreasing slope that is most marked at a pHcorresponding to the highest pKa . The graphsof the solubility of metals versus pH (Figs.

I—3)1 —3) showed that extractability by these oxy-acid anions also depended on the extractantpH and had a tendency to decrease with ris-ing pH and progressing deprotonation of theextractant acid. The extraction graphs ofmetals when oxalate was used showed thatwhen the pH was higher than that correspond-ing to the highest pK a of acid, the extracta-bility graphs descended steeply.

The fact that the extracting ability of or-ganic acid anions depends on pH is not sig-nificant only in choosing the pH of the extrac-tant solution; it is also important when soil

Fig. 2. Extractability of iron (% of Tamm’s oxalate-extractable Fe) versus extractant pH

76

Page 5: in oxalate, EDTA

conditions are considered. Organic acids arepresent in soil as a consequence of rootexudation and microbial activity in therhizosphere (Curl and Truelove 1986), theyact as chelators in soil formation processes(Schnitzer 1959, Hingston 1962), and theyaffect the availability of plant nutrients, e.g.phosphorus. In acid soil, the removal of phos-phate by organic acid anions is pH-dependentand occurs largely through dissolution and

References

Anon. 1984. Handbook of chemistry and physics. 65thEd. Boca Raton, Florida.

Curl, E.A. & Trueiove, B. 1986. The rhizosphere. 288p. Berlin.

Elonen, P. 1971. Particle-size analysis of soil. Acta Agr.Fenn. 122: 1 122.

Graham, E.R. 1948. Determination of soil organic mat-ter by means of a photoelectric colorimeter. Soil Sci.65: 181 183.

Hinosion, F.J. 1962. Activity of polyphenols consti-tuents of leaves of Eucalyptus and other species incomplexing and dissolving iron oxide. Aust. J. SoilRes. 1: 63—73.

—, Atkinson, R.J., Posni k, A.M. & Quirk, J.P. 1967.Specific adsorption of anions. Nature 215: 14591461.

chelation of iron and aluminium (Lopez-Hernandez et al. 1979). Organic anionsenhance the solubility of metals; thus, forexample, the concentration of aluminium in-creases more than would be expected only onthe basis of the pH (Reuss and Johnson1986). The effect of soil acidification is toenhance the ability of organic acid anions tosolubilize metals through complexation.

—, Atkinson, R.J., Posni-r, A.M. & Quirk, J.P. 1968.Specific adsorption of anions on goethite. Trans. 9thInt. Congr. Soil Sci. 1: 669—677.

LoPEZ-HeRNANDEZ, D., FIjORES, D., SIEGERT, G. & RoURIGUEZ,J.V. 1979. The effect of some organic anions on phos-phate removal from acid and calcareous soils. Soil Sci.128: 321—326.

Martell, A.E. & Calvin, M. 1956. Chemistry of themetal chelate compounds. 613 p. Englewood Cliffs,N.J.

McKeacue, J.A. 1967. An evaluation of 0.1 M pyro-phosphate and pyrophosphate-dithionite in compar-ison with oxalate as extractants of the accumulationproducts in Podzols and some other soils. Can. J. SoilSci. 47: 95—99.

McLean, E.0., Heddleson, M.R., Bariiett, R.J. &

77

Fig. 3. Extractability of manganese (% of Tamm’s oxalate-extractable Mn) versus extractant pH

Page 6: in oxalate, EDTA

Holowaychuk, N. 1958. Aluminum in soils: I. Extrac-tion methods and magnitudes in clays and Ohio soils.Soil Sci. Soc. Proc. 22: 382—387.

Niskanen, R. 1989. Effect of extractant pH on release ofsoil phosphorus, aluminium and iron by ammoniumfluoride. J. Agric. Sei. Finl. 61: 67—72.

Reuss, J.O. & Johnson, D.W. 1986. Acid deposition andthe acidification of soils and waters. 119 p. New York.

Ryti, R. 1965. On the determination of soil pH. J.

Scient. Agric. Soc. Eini. 37; 51—60.Schnitzer, M. 1959. Interaction of iron with rainfall

SELOSTUS

Kivennäismaiden uuttuva alumiini, rauta jamangaaniI Uuttuvuuden riippuvuus oksalaatti-, pyro-fosfaatti- ja EDTA-uuttoliuoslen pH:sta

Raina NiskanenHelsingin yliopisto, Maanviljelyskemian laitos,00710 Helsinki

Kahden kivennäismaan alumiinia, rautaa ja mangaa-nia uutettiin 0,05 M ja 0,02 M Oksalaani- ja pyrofosfaatti-liuoksilla sekä 0,02 M EDTA-liuoksilla, joiden pH oli1,7—11,0. Suuntauksena oli, että metallien uuttuminenväheni uuttoliuoksen pH:n ja uuttavan hapon dissosiaa-tioasteen kohotessa. Uuttuvuus aleni jyrkästi oksalaatti-

leachates. J. Soil Sci. 10: 300—308.Tamm, O. 1922. Eine Methode zur Bestimmung der anor-

ganischen Komponente des Gelkomplexes im Boden.Statens Skogsförsöksanstalt. Medd. 19: 387—404.Stockholm.

Tweneboah, C.K., Greenland, D.J. & Oades, J.M. 1967.Changes in charge characteristics ofsoils after treat-ment with 0.5 M calcium chloride at pH 1.5. Aust.J. Soil Res. 5; 247—261.

Ms received January 12, 1988

liuoksen pH:n ollessa yli 4, kun uuttuvuus pyrofosfaa-tilla pysyi kohtalaisena laajalla pH-alueella. EDTA (pH3,6—7,3) uutti vähemmän metalleja kuin Oksalaani japy-rofosfaatti. Pelkkä 0,01 M KCI uutti pH-alueella 2—llvähemmän metalleja kuin tutkittavat uuttoliuokset.

78