Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

59
Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor Danilo Collalto Paulo Intellectual Property & Science Scientific and Scholarly Research

Transcript of Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Page 1: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Danilo Collalto PauloIntellectual Property & ScienceScientific and Scholarly Research

Page 2: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Introducing myself and asking a few questions

In this audience:

How many of you collaborate in a journal indexed in ISI Web of Science?

How many of you represent a publisher of multiple journals?

How many of you are members of an editorial board?

How many of you are reviewers?

How many of you have access to WoS and JCR?

Page 3: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

THOMSON REUTERS JOURNAL SELECTION PROCESS

Page 4: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

FACTS

4

papers will be read by a researcher in a year, on average200+of journals (50,000+) on average a scientist is capable of reading in a year

0.4%Tenopir C. What Scientists Really Need. In: American Association for the Advancement of Science Meeting (AAAS). Washington D.C.; 2005.

Page 5: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

BRADFORD'S LAW

5

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

% o

f d

atab

ase

# of journals

Articles Citations

A relatively small number of journals publish the majority of significant scholarly results

Page 6: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

For decades, Thomson Reuters has carefully evaluated journals for potential inclusion in the database

100 %of the top 100 universitieshave Web of Science

GOLD STANDARDused by 5,000+ institutions in 100+ countries

scholarship

Selective, yet comprehensive

BESTDiscover the world’s

NEUTR

AL

Page 7: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

JOURNAL SELECTION : MAIN OBJECTIVES1. To evaluate and select the best scholarly journal

content available today for coverage in Web of Science.

As a result, the Web of Science is known as the worldwide source for top tier scholarly research published in the best international and regional journals.

2. Provide the worldwide publishing community with objective standards useful in building world-class publications.

Thomson Reuters has built lasting partnerships with the global scholarly publishing community. We work together to improve the quality of scholarly communication everywhere in the world.

7

Page 8: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

3000+

10 ~ 12% Accepted

A continual process of evaluation and assessment of existing journals

Necessary information is provided based upon a consistent selection process

Page 9: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

A list of current journals in collectionhttp://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl

Page 10: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Journal Selection Process for Web of Science

Journal Publishing Standards

Editorial Content

International Diversity

Citation Analysis

Four Points of Evaluation

Page 11: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Journal Selection Process for Web of Science

Journal Publishing Standards

Editorial Content

International Diversity

Citation Analysis

• Timeliness of publication

• International Editorial Conventions

• English language Bibliographic Information

• Peer Review

Page 12: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Timeliness of publication• A journal must be published according to its

stated publication schedule

• Must receive three current issues in sequence to begin evaluation

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov

Journal

1

Journal

2

Journal

3

Journal

4

Journal

5

Journal

6

The content is robust with sufficient manuscripts in the pipeline

Page 13: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Journal Selection Process for Web of Science

Journal Publishing Standards

Editorial Content

International Diversity

Citation Analysis

• Timeliness of publication

• International Editorial Conventions

• English language Bibliographic Information

• Peer Review

Page 14: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

14

Informative Journal titles

International Editorial Conventions

Fully descriptive Article titles and abstracts

Full address information for every author

Page 15: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

15

International Editorial Conventions

Complete bibliographic information for all cited references

Page 16: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Journal Selection Process for Web of Science

Journal Publishing Standards

Editorial Content

International Diversity

Citation Analysis

• Timeliness of publication

• International Editorial Conventions

• English language Bibliographic Information

• Peer Review

Page 17: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

English language Bibliographic Information

• Article titles• Author names and addresses• Cited references in the Roman

alphabet• Abstracts and Keywords

Page 18: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

English language Bibliographic Information

However, English language content is not always essential in some areas of the Arts & Humanities such as national literature studies where full text in the native language is normal.

Page 19: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Journal Selection Process for Web of Science

Journal Publishing Standards

Editorial Content

International Diversity

Citation Analysis

• Timeliness of publication

• International Editorial Conventions

• English language Bibliographic Information

• Peer Review

Page 20: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Peer Review must be an explicit part of the publishing process

Page 21: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Funding source is also recommended whenever possible

Page 22: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Journal Selection Process for Web of Science

Journal Publishing Standards

Editorial Content

International Diversity

Citation Analysis

• How does this journal compare with covered journals of similar scope?

• Is this subject already well covered?

• Will this journal enrich WoS with novel content?

Core coverage in Web of Science is not static !

Page 23: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

What journals are covered in specific subject category?

Page 24: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

What journals are covered in specific subject category?

What journals are covered in specific subject category?

Page 25: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

What are the contents in a journal of interest ?

Page 26: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Journal Selection Process for Web of Science

Journal Publishing Standards

Editorial Content

International Diversity

Citation Analysis

• Does this journal target an International or Regional audience?

• Do authors, editors, Editorial Advisory Board members represent the international research community?

Page 27: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Publication Name=(Clinical Infectious Diseases )Impact Factor (2012) : 9.374

EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD

Anucha Apisarnthanarak, Pratumthani, ThailandRoberto Badaro, Salvador, BrazilCarol J. Baker, HoustonFernando Baquero, Madrid, SpainJohn G. Bartlett, BaltimoreStephen G. Baum, New YorkJohn E. Bennett, BethesdaEmilio Bouza, Madrid, SpainYehuda Carmeli, Tel Aviv, IsraelG. Ralph Corey, DurhamErika M.C. D'Agata, BostonSilvano Esposito, Naples, ItalyJavier Garau, Barcelona, SpainJose M. Gatell, Barcelona, SpainM. Lindsay Grayson, Melbourne, AustraliaJames G. Hakim, Harare, ZimbabweCarol A. Kauffman, Ann ArborKeith P. Klugman, AtlantaUmesh G. Lalloo, Congella, South AfricaStephen D. Lawn, Cape Town, South AfricaCatherine Leport, Paris, FranceDaniel P. Lew, Geneva, SwitzerlandLionel A. Mandell, Hamilton, CanadaJeanne M. Marrazzo, SeattleThomas J. Marrie, Halifax, CanadaDaniel M. Musher, HoustonCarl Erik Nord, Stockholm, SwedenTimothy Peto, Oxford, EnglandDidier Raoult, Marseille, FranceGuillermo M. Ruiz-Palacios, Tlalpan, MexicoMarisela Silva, Caracas, VenezuelaVincent Soriano, Madrid, SpainSoumya Swaminathan, Chennai, IndiaJoseph M. Vinetz, La JollaGui-Qiang Wang, Beijing, ChinaAndreas F. Widmer, Basel, SwitzerlandKwok-yung Yuen, Hong Kong, ChinaAnita K. M. Zaidi, Karachi, PakistanAbigail D. Zuger, New York

159

Countries / territoriesrepresented

in article level (Web of Science)

Do the contributing authors, EAB represent the international research community ?

Source: http://cid.oxfordjournals.org (as of 18 October 2013)

Source: Thomson Reuters Web of Science (as of 18 October 2013)

Page 28: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Publication Name=(Neurological Research)

The need for international diversity is viewed in relationship to the target audience for the journal

60 Countries / territories International

audience

Source: Thomson Reuters Web of Science (as of 18 October 2013)

Page 29: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Publication Name=(Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology)

34 Countries / territories

The need for international diversity is viewed in relationship to the target audience for the journal

Regional focus

Source: Thomson Reuters Web of Science (as of 18 October 2013)

Page 30: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Regional Journals

• From 2007-2009

• focused on a collection of more than 10,000 regional journals

• 1600 met the review standards for inclusion in the Web of Science

• accounting for 55% of all new journals indexed between 2005-2010

30

Page 31: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Regional focus Journals

• Importance is measured in terms of content specificity:

– Will it enrich coverage of a subject?– Will it provide specific regional perspective?

• Publish excellent research targeted at a regional rather than international audience

• Citation Impact may be low to moderate – but stable

• Regional journals meet all journal selection criteria

31

Page 32: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Journal Selection Process for Web of Science

Journal Publishing Standards

Editorial Content

International Diversity

Citation Analysis

• New journals

- Citations to authors’ and editors’ prior work.

• Established Journals

- Estimated Impact Factor

- How the journal compares to other journals in its field

To determine the importance

and influence of a journal in

the surrounding literature of

the subject

Page 33: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

33

12

4 3

5

How your journal has been cited in Web of Science ?

Page 34: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

How your journal has been cited in Web of Science ?

Page 35: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Identifying the papers that cited your journal

Page 36: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

36

Impact Factor (2012) =

Cites in 2012 to 2010 and 2011 papers

Citable items published in 2010 and 2011

The average number of citations in 2012 to scholarly material that was published in the prior two years

201220112010

Source paper – published in 2012

Cited reference – published in 2010 or 2011

Citations

2012 Impact Factor

All Previous Years

2009 2013

Time

Calculation of Impact Factor

Page 37: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

37

Calculation of Impact Factor

Journal: ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWCategories: BUSINESS / MANAGEMENT

Self Citations

Page 38: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Self Citations

Source: 2009 JCR

Journal was suppressed from 2010.

Effect of Self Citations

on rank in category:

From Q1

To Q4

• Chemistry, Medicinal

• Pharmacology & Pharmacy

Page 39: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

85%

Most journals have self-citation rates of less than or equal to 15%Source: JCR Science Edition (2010)

• Excessive self-citation weakens the integrity of the journal’s Impact Factor

• Journals with excessive self-citation may be suppressed from Journal Citation Reports until the problem is corrected

Page 40: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Journal Selection Process for Web of Science

Journal Publishing Standards

Editorial Content

International Diversity

Citation Analysis

Page 41: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

URLs:

• Journal selection process in Portuguese

http://wokinfo.com/essays/journal-selection-process/

• How to submit a Journal

http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/info/journalsubmission-front/

Page 42: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

How Can I Improve my Journal?

1. Enrollment of more internationally high impact researcher in journal editorial board

2. Active recruitment of high-impact articles

3. More careful article selection

4. Offering authors better services

5. Boosting the journal’s media profile

6. Finding niches

• New England J Med• Ann Intern Med• BMJ• JAMA• Lancet• Med J Australia• Can Med Assn J

M. Chew, E. V. Villanueva, and M. B. Van Der Weyden, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 100 (3), 142 (2007).

Thomson Reuters can help.

Page 43: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

How to “get” an impact factor?• Pass the selection process• Be indexed during 3 years

48

How to “keep” an impact factor?• Be ethical• Keep self Citations under 15%

How to “increase” an impact factor?• Professionalize your staff• Professionalize your processes• Be strategic

In brief:

Page 44: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

Publication Processing

3501 Market Street, Philadelphia,

PA 19104, USA

[email protected]

Page 45: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor
Page 46: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

SCHOLARONE MANUSCRIPTS

• Our business is global

• Over 500 international customers

• 15 million registered users

• 1.8 million submissions from 237 countries

• 1.2 million original submissions– 5,000 submission a day– Largest: USA (258,259)

– Smallest: Saint Vincent & the Grenadines / Marshall Islands / Vatican (1)

– BRAZIL: 98 Journals

Page 47: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

SOME OF OUR CUSTOMERS

52

Page 48: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

DEMO

Page 49: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

DEMO

Page 50: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

DEMO

Page 51: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

DEMO

Page 52: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

DEMO

Page 53: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

DEMO

Page 54: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

DEMO

Page 55: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

DEMO

Page 56: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

DEMO

Page 57: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

DEMO

Page 58: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

DEMO

Page 59: Improving the quality of my journal and increase its impact factor

THANK YOU

Danilo CollaltoScientific & Scholarly ResearchThomson Reuters

[email protected]