ICRC on IHL and Business

8/10/2019 ICRC on IHL and Business

1/28

B U S

I N

E S

S

A N D

I H L B U S I N E S S A N DI N T E R N A T I O N A L

H U M A N I T A R I A N L A W

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS

OF BUSINESS ENTERPRISES

UNDER INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW


2/28


3/28

T H

E

I C

R

C

A

N

D

B

U

S

I N

E S

S

E N

T E R

P R

I S

E S

States party to the Geneva Conventions have mandated the ICRC

to protect and assist persons affected by armed conflict and to

promote awareness of, and respect for, international humanitari-

an law. To fulfil its mandate, the ICRC seeks to develop a con-

structive dialogue with all State and non-State actors who have a

stake in or may have an influence on situations of armed conflict.

It is within this framework that the ICRC engages with business

enterprises. The main objective of this dialogue is to help them

better understand their rights and meet their obligations under

international humanitarian law. The ICRC also wants to assist

business enterprises in implementing undertakings relating to

international humanitarian law to which they have subscribed

under various multi-stakeholder initiatives.

The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights is the only

initiative emanating from a multi-stakeholder process that expressly

refers to international humanitarian law. Various other inter-

governmental processes or multi-stakeholder initiatives promote

respect for human rights or endeavour to mitigate the social impact

of business projects. To the extent that these may also have an effect

in situations of armed conflict, they are of interest to the ICRC; the

following initiatives or processes could be mentioned in this regard:

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises;

The International Finance Corporations Policy and Performance Standards on Social and Environmental Sustainability;

The Equator Principles; The United Nations Global Compact; The Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights.

The ICRC also closely follows the ongoing discussions on the issue

of business and human rights taking place in the framework of the

United Nations human rights system.


4/28

C

O

N T

E

N

T

S


5/28

5

PREFACE 7

INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW 9

What is international humanitarian law? 9

What are the basic rules of international humanitarian law? 10

When and where does international humanitarian law apply? 11

Where can we find the rules of international humanitarian law? 12

What are the relationship and differences between international humanitarian law and human rights law? 13

Are business enterprises and their staff and managers bound by international humanitarian law? 14

What are war crimes? 15

RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS 1 7

How are the operations of business enterprises protected against attacks under international humanitarian law? 17

What additional protections do the personnel of business enterprises enjoy? 18

What additional protections do the assets of business enterprises enjoy? 19

OBLIGATIONS AND RISKS 2 1

What does international humanitar ian law say with regard to managing the security of business operations? 21

Are there rules relating to the acquisition of assets in situations of conflict? 22

What does international humanitarian law say about labour conditions? 23

What does international humanitarian law say on displacement? 24

Are there any rules protecting the environment in times of conflict? 24

What are the specific risks associated with the manufacture and trade of weapons? 25

What are the risks of liability under international humanitarian law? 26


6/28

P

R

E F A

C

E


7/28

The globalization of market economies offers new opportunities

for business enterprises. While these opportunities can generategrowth, jobs and prosperity, they also give rise to risks. Indeed as

business enterprises explore these opportunities, they increasingly

operate in unstable environments or areas affected by armed

conflict.

A number of business enterprises have declared a commitment to

conducting their activities in a conflict-sensitive way. In particular,

in recognition of the fact that their operations are likely to have an

impact on the dynamics of conflicts and on the suffering of civilian

populations, they have indicated that they will take great care not to

exacerbate conflicts and their effects on civilian populations.

Business enterprises have become increasingly familiar with human

rights law. Many have adopted corporate policies aimed at ensuring

that their operations respect, and at times even promote respect

for, human rights, as well as policies aimed at reducing the likeli-

hood of contributing, directly or indirectly, to human rights abuses.

And many are involved in the various fora searching for a shared

understanding of the boundaries of business responsibility for

human rights.

Business enterprises are generally less familiar with international

humanitarian law, even though this body of law, specifically devel-

oped to regulate situations of armed conflict, has important impli-

cations for them when they operate in countries experiencing

armed conflict. On the one hand international humanitarian law

grants protection to the personnel provided they do not take part

directly in armed hostilities and the assets and capital investments

of business enterprises. On the other hand it imposes obligations

on managers and staff and exposes them and the business enter-

prises themselves to the risk of criminal or civil liability.

The risk of criminal or civil liability is undoubtedly the most

pressing challenge confronting business enterprises whose activi-

ties are connected in one way or another with armed conflict. It is

relevant not only for business enterprises which may themselvesviolate international humanitarian law, but also for those which

may contribute to violations of international humanitarian law

committed by the parties to the armed conflict. The issue of

potential complicity is thus something business enterprises must

be keenly aware of.

The aim of the present brochure is to provide managers of busi-

ness enterprises with a simple basic document flagging situations

where business operations may either benefit from the protections

afforded by international humanitarian law or be constrained by

its rules. The brochure is meant primarily for a readership of

country managers and security managers who face the daily chal-

lenge of running business operations in conflict environments. It

may also serve as a reference for financial, insurance and trading

companies which are not directly operating in zones of armed

conflict themselves, but may do so indirectly through their clients

and suppliers.

The brochure does not provide a comprehensive legal analysis.

Depending on the circumstances, business managers may thus

wish to seek legal advice.

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) hopes that

this brochure will prove a useful introduction to the complex and

under-explored issue of the relationship between business and

international humanitarian law. It is convinced that by clarifying

the relevant aspects of international humanitarian law for busi-

ness enterprises whose activities are connected in one way or

another with armed conflict, this brochure will help them develop

business operations that, at a minimum, respect and do no harm

to people affected by conflict.

7


8/28

I N T E R N

A T I

O N A L

H U M A N I T A R I A N

L A W


9/28

International humanitarian law is also known as the law of

armed conflict or the law of war. Its fundamental premise is

that even in times of armed conflict human dignity must be

respected and protected, and means and methods of warfare

regulated. Rules reflecting these principles can be found through-

out history in most if not all cultures.

The codification of these rules at the international level started

in the mid-nineteenth century, when States sought to formalize

international humanitarian law in binding treaties. Since then, a

variety of treaties have been concluded in order to develop and

define humanitarian protections during armed conflict.

What is international humanitarian law?

9

R E U T E R

S / J I R

O O

S E

, C O U R T E S Y


10/28

What are the basic rules of internationalhumanitarian law?

Parties to an armed conflict must at all times distinguish between

the civilian population and combatants in order to spare the

civilian population and civilian property. Attacks may be directed

solely against military objectives. Neither the civilian population as

a whole nor individual civilians may be attacked. Attacks againstcivilian objects or indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. It is also

prohibited to displace the civilian population.

People who do not or no longer take a direct part in the hostili-

ties are entitled to respect for their lives and for their physical and

mental integrity. Such people must in all circumstances be pro-tected and treated with humanity, without any adverse distinction

whatever. It is forbidden to kill or wound an adversary who sur-

renders or who can no longer take part in the fighting.

Parties to an armed conflict do not have an unlimited right to choose

methods and means of warfare. It is forbidden to use weapons or

methods of warfare that are likely to cause superfluous injury or

unnecessary suffering or widespread, long-term and severe

damage to the environment.

Attacks against works and installations containing dangerous

forces, such as dams, dykes and nuclear electrical generating sta-tions are also generally prohibited. Moreover goods that are indis-

pensable to the survival of the civilian population in particular

food and water must be protected.

The wounded and sick must be collected and cared for by the

party to the conflict which has them in its power. Medical person-

nel and medical establishments, transports and equipment must

be spared. The red cross, red crescent or red crystal on a whitebackground is the distinctive sign indicating that such persons

and objects must be respected.

Captured combatants and civilians who find themselves under

the authority of the adverse party are entitled to respect for their

lives, their dignity, their personal rights and their political, reli-

gious and other convictions. They must be protected against all

acts of violence or reprisal. They are entitled to exchange news

with their families and receive aid. They must enjoy basic judicial

guarantees.

INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW

E R I C

B O U V E T

/ I C R

C


11/28

When and where does international

humanitarian law apply?

International humanitarian law regulates situations of armed con-

flict. It applies in the whole territory of the States involved in a

conflict, regardless of whether combat actually takes place there.

Furthermore, it applies continuously until the end of the conflict.

International humanitarian law distinguishes between interna-

tional and non-international armed conflicts. International armed

conflicts oppose two or more States. Non-international armed

conflicts colloquially known as civil wars on the other hand

oppose a State and an organized armed group or two or more

such groups. Although as a matter of law internal disturbances,

such as riots, isolated and sporadic acts of violence and acts of

criminality, do not amount to non-international armed conflict,

such events may escalate into non-international armed conflict or

often occur in States experiencing armed conflict.

An extensive range of treaty rules governs international armed con-

flicts, including situations of military occupation. A more limited

set of treaty rules governs non-international armed conflicts. How -

ever, no matter which specific set of rules applies, all entities, States,

groups and individuals whose activities are associated with armed

conflict are required to respect international humanitarian law

irrespective of the reasons for the conflict or the conduct of the

opposing side.

11

BUSINESS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW


12/28

Since the initial Geneva Convention of 1864, humanitarian law

has evolved to meet the ever-growing need for protection result-

ing from developments in weaponry and new types of conflict.

Today, the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional

Protocols of 1977 constitute the main instruments of internationalhumanitarian law. Numerous other treaties address more specific

topics related to conflicts, such as the regulation and use of specific

weapons. International humanitarian law treaties are also comple-

mented by customary international law. The latter is constituted by

a series of rules that are not necessarily codified in treaties but derive

from the consistent practice of States, accompanied by a belief that

this practice is legally required.

As a testimony to the universality of international humanitarian law,

all States have ratified the Geneva Conventions of 1949. The vast

majority are also party to the Additional Protocols of 1977.

Where can we find the rules of internationalhumanitarian law?

Main IHL treaties

1907 Hague Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land

1949 Geneva Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the

Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field

1949 Geneva Convention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of

Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea

1949 Geneva Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War

1949 Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons

in Time of War

1977 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and

relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I)1977 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and

relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts

(Protocol II)

2005 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and

relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (Protocol III)

1980 Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain

Conventional Weapons Which May be Deemed to be Excessively Injurious

or to Have Indiscriminate Effects

1980 Protocol on Non-Detectable Fragments (Protocol I to the 1980Convention)

1980 Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines,Booby-Traps and Other Devices (Protocol II to the 1980 Convention) 1980 Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary

Weapons (Protocol III to the 1980 Convention)

1995 Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons (Protocol IV to the 1980Convention)

1996 Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines,Booby-Traps and Other Devices (Protocol II to the 1980 Convention

as amended on 3 May 1996)

2001 Amendment Article 1 to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictionson the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May be Deemed to be

Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects. Geneva

2003 Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War (Protocol V to the 1980Convention)

1997 Ottawa Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production

and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction

1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event

of Armed Conflict

1954 Protocol for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of ArmedConflict

1999 Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protectionof Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict



13/28

What are the relationship and differencesbetween international humanitarian law andhuman rights law?

International humanitarian law and international human rights are

complementary bodies of law that simultaneously apply in times

of war. Both share certain common goals, such as the protection

of life, health, dignity and property. Because international human-

itarian law is more specifically focused on the regulation of armed

conflict, in such contexts human rights will often be interpreted

based on standards of international humanitarian law. For exam-

ple, in situations of armed conflict the right to life under human

rights law must be interpreted in light of the rules of internationalhumanitarian law, which permit attacks against combatants.

In relation to other issues, such as procedural safeguards, human

rights law may be relied upon as a supplementary body of rules

protecting persons affected by armed conflict.

Despite the sometimes complex overlap with human rights law,

international humanitarian law retains various distinct character-

istics. Perhaps the most fundamental one of these is that human

rights are traditionally understood as only binding on States

although this position is challenged by some human rights advo-

cates while international humanitarian law binds both State

and non-State actors including managers and staff of business

enterprises for instance whose activities are closely linked to an

armed conflict. While certain human rights may temporarily be

derogated under strict conditions and circumstances threateningthe life of the nation, such as armed conflicts, international

humanitarian law is specifically designed for such circumstances

and can never be derogated.

13



14/28

Are business enterprisesand their staff and managers bound byinternational humanitarian law?

4

International humanitarian law does not just bind States, organ-

ized armed groups and soldiers it binds all actors whose activitiesare closely linked to an armed conflict. Consequently, although

States and organized armed groups bear the greatest responsibility

for implementing international humanitarian law, a business

enterprise carrying out activities that are closely linked to an armed

conflict must also respect applicable rules of international human-

itarian law. Moreover, whether a business enterprise operates in

a context of ongoing armed conflict or whether its operations,

established in a peaceful setting, are caught up by the outbreak of

an armed conflict does not affect its obligation to respect interna-

tional humanitarian law.

Determining which activities are closely linked to an armed conflict

is, however, not always easy. Providing direct support to one side

in a battle is clearly such an activity. But business enterprises are

likely to carry out a whole range of other activities which can be

more or less connected with an armed conflict.

On the other hand, a business enterprise that violates provisions

of the national criminal law of a country in circumstances that are

completely independent of a surrounding armed conflict does not

violate international humanitarian law. However, the line between

these various situations is at times difficult to draw precisely.

In view of the above, business enterprises operating in zones of

armed conflict should use extreme caution and be aware that their

actions may be considered to be closely linked to the conflict even

though they do not take place during fighting or on the battlefield.

Likewise, it is not necessary for business enterprises and their

managers to intend to support a party to the hostilities for their

activities to be considered to be closely linked to the conflict.



15/28

What are war crimes?War crimes represent a core of the most egregious violations of

international humanitarian law. In recognition of the seriousness

of such violations, States have agreed that the perpetrators of war

crimes should be prosecuted and punished before criminal courts.

The Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocol I not only

oblige States to criminalize certain grave breaches of international

humanitarian law in their national legislation, they also require that

all States investigate and prosecute such offences irrespective of

where they take place and by whom they are committed.

Consequently, war crimes form part of the criminal law of most

States. In addition, several international courts and tr ibunals,

including the International Criminal Court, have jurisdiction to

prosecute those responsible for such offences.

Many States have also criminalized under their national law other

serious violations of international humanitarian law that are notlisted above.

A significant risk of criminal liability thus exists for those who

commit grave breaches of international humanitarian law,

including where business enterprises or their representatives

commit or knowingly assist violations carried out by others,

such as con tractors, subsidiaries or clients.

Moreover, participation in war cr imes might also give rise to civil

liability before national courts.

15

List of war crimes

War crimes include: 1

wilful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, including biologicalexperiments, wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury

to body or health to protected persons or prisoners of war;

unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement ofa protected person;

compelling a protected person or prisoner of war to servein the forces of a hostile Power;

wilfully depriving a protected person or prisoner of war of the rightsof fair and regular trial; taking of hostages; making the civilian population or individual civilians the object

of attack;

launching an indiscriminate attack affecting the civilian populationor civilian objects in the knowledge that such attack will cause

excessive loss of life, injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects;

extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified bymilitary necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.

1 See: Article 50 Geneva Convention I; Article 51 Geneva Convention II; Article 130 Geneva Convention III; Article 147 Geneva Convention IV; and Article 85 Additional Protocol I.


R E U T E R

S / T H E M I S T

O C L E

S H A K I Z I M A N A

, C O U R T E

S Y


16/28

R

I G

H

T S

A

N

D

P

R

O

T E

C

T I

O

N

S

Business enterprises are reluctant to abandon their

personnel, their operations and their capital investments

when an armed conflict breaks out around them.

A withdrawal of business enterprises from conflict zonesmay also be undesirable: countries struggling to

overcome the torments of armed conflict usually need

economic development and private investment.

The rules of international humanitarian law that protect

civilians and civilian property prohibit attacks against

business enterprises personnel as long as they are not

taking a direct part in hostilities and against business

enterprises facilities.


17/28

How are the operations of business enterprisesprotected against attacks under internationalhumanitarian law?

One of the most immediate threats to business enterprises oper-

ating in conflict zones is that of military activities affecting their

workforce or their assets.

International humanitarian law strictly prohibits deliberate

attacks on civilians and civilian objects, 2 such as business enter-

prises, as well as indiscriminate attacks, i.e. attacks that do not

distinguish military targets from civilian persons or objects. 3

Personnel of business enterprises be they local or expatriate

personnel or contractors performing their usual business activ-

ities are generally considered civilians and therefore benefit from

the protection against deliberate and indiscriminate attacks. How -

ever, international humanitarian law stipulates that civilians who

directly participate in hostilities lose their protection from attack

for the time that they are carrying out these activities. 4 It is not

always easy however to determine what amounts to direct partic-

ipation in hostilities.

Recognizing the inherent difficulties in making such a determina-

tion in practice, international humanitarian law provides that in

case of doubt as to whether a person is a civilian or a combatant,

that person is to be considered a civilian.

Business enterprises property such as factories, offices, vehicles,

land and resources are considered civilian objects and thus also

benefit from the protection against deliberate and indiscriminateattacks. However, if business property is used for military purposes,

it becomes a military object and risks being legitimately attacked

by parties to the conflict. The test for determining whether busi-

ness assets are military targets is in particular whether the facilities

or resources in question are used in a way that makes an effective

contribution to military action. 5

It is thus crucial to keep in mind that any civilian object may become

a military target depending on the manner in which it is used.

Legitimate attacks against military objectives can cause civilian

collateral damage. However, international humanitarian law

stipulates that military targets may not be attacked if the likely

incidental consequences for civilians and civilian objects are exces-

sive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage of

destroying the military objective. 6

Between these examples are a number of more difficult situations,which business enterprises should consider when they determine

where to situate their premises and operations or whether to relo-

cate as the dynamics of the surrounding conflict change.

17

International humanitarian law instruments do not providea clear-cut definition of what amounts to direct participationin hostilities. It is however generally understood that thecommission of acts which, by their nature and purpose, areintended to cause actual harm to enemy personnel and matriel amounts to a direct participation in hostilities. That wouldclearly be the case if an employee of a business enterprisetook up arms or participated in the planning of a military operation.On the other hand, an employee of a business enterprisewho supplied food or shelter to combatants or generallysympathized with them would not be considered to bedirectly participating in the hostilities.

2 Article 48 Additional Protocol I; Article 13 Additional Protocol II.3 Articles 51(4) and (5) of Additional Protocol I.4 Article 51(3) Additional Protocol I; Article 13(3) Additional Protocol II.5 Article 52 Additional Protocol I.6 Article 51(5)(b) Additional Protocol I.

If, for example, a business enterprise with manufacturingfacilities in a country in conflict produces ammunition thatis used by a party to the conflict, then its munitions factorybecomes a legitimate target, as would trucks or planesused to transport the ammunition.Similarly, if a private oil pipeline carries oil that is transferredto and used by a party to the conflict for its military operations,it also becomes a legitimate target.On the other hand, if a business enterprise manufactures or sellsproducts or services that do not effectively contribute to militaryaction, it does not become a legitimate target, unless its premisesare used by a party to the conflict for its military operations.

The use of a grenade to kill a single soldier in a crowdedmarketplace or factory would thus be prohibited as its adverseeffects on civilians are likely to be excessive in relation tothe concrete and direct military benefit of killing the soldier.On the other hand minor damage to a factory located in closeproximity to a major military barracks could be justified.Civilians working in an ammunition factory would be at riskin case of attack against this military objective.


18/28

What additional protections do the personnel

of business enterprises enjoy?

8

Direct attack is by no means the only threat to the personnel of

business enterprises operating in conflict zones. These persons,

whether locals or expatriate, may face many other serious threats

to their physical integrity as a result of armed conflict.

International humanitarian law provides a series of specific pro-

tections for civilians in times of armed conflict. As civilians, the

personnel of business enterprises enjoy legal protection against

violence to their life, health and physical or mental well-being.

In particular murder, torture in either mental or physical form,

corporal punishment, rape and mutilations are all strictly prohib-

ited. 7 Neither expatriate nor local personnel may be taken hostage

by parties to an armed conflict. 8

International humanitarian law also grants legal protection to civil-

ians deprived of their liberty. In addition to laying down minimumconditions and standards of treatment in detention, all persons

deprived of liberty enjoy the right to be informed of the reasons

for their detention 9 and to challenge the legality of their captivity.

A host of more specific legal protections apply to different types

of detention that may occur during armed conflict 10 including

ICRC visits to persons detained in relation with the conflict.

If a business enterprises staff are charged with criminal offences

linked to the armed conflict, a sentence can be handed down only

by a court offering the essential guarantees of independence and

impartiality. 11 The accused also have a right to be informed with-

out delay of the particulars of the offence alleged against them.

Moreover, collective punishment and convictions for acts that did

not constitute crimes at the time of their commission are prohib-

ited. Even in a context of armed conflict, the accused enjoy the

presumption of innocence, the right to attend court and the right

to appeal. 12

7 See Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions of 1949; Article 32 GenevaConvention IV; Article 75(2) Additional Protocol I; Article 4(2) Additional Protocol II.

8 See Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions of 1949; Article 34 GenevaConvention IV; Article 75(2)(c) Additional Protocol I; Article 4(2)(c) Additional Protocol II.

9 See Article 75(3) Additional Protocol I.10 See Articles 42, 43, 78 82 Geneva Convention IV and generally Geneva Convention III.11 See Article 84 Geneva Convention III; Article 71 Geneva Convention IV; Article 75(4)

Additional Protocol I; Article 6(2) Additional Protocol II.12 For judicial guarantees during armed conflict see Articles 82 108 Geneva Convention III;

Articles 71 78 Geneva Convention IV; Article 75(4) Additional Protocol I; Article 6 Additional Protocol II.

RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS


19/28

What additional protections do the assetsof business enterprises enjoy?

One of the major risks faced by business enterprises in times of

armed conflict involves the misappropriation or looting of assets

and investments. The risks are particularly pronounced where an

armed conflict creates a climate of hardship, scarcity of resources

and collapse of local law enforcement mechanisms such as police

and courts.

International humanitarian law states that private property must

be respected. 13 It is, for example, prohibited to confiscate private

property. The prohibition covers the premises and investments of

business enterprises, as well as housing for their personnel, to the

extent that they are privately owned.

Under limited circumstances however, an occupying power may

be entitled to seize the property of business enterprises, provided

it is returned and compensation paid at the end of the armed

conflict. 14 An occupier may also use a certain portion of S tate

property to offset costs of administering the occupied territory. 15

Beyond these limitations, unlawful appropriation of business assets

during armed conflict or occupation will amount to pillage, which

is considered a war crime. 16

19

13 Article 46 Hague Regulations; Article 33 Geneva Convention IV.14 Articles 52 and 53 Hague Regulations.15 Article 55 Hague Regulations.16 Article 33(2) of Geneva Convention IV, Article 47 Hague Regulations.


B E N N

O N E E L E M A N

/ I C R

C


20/28

O B L I G

A T I

O N

S

A N D

R I

S K

S

Business enterprises carrying out activities that are

closely linked to an armed conflict are required to respect

relevant aspects of international humanitarian law.

Furthermore, they may be in a position to play animportant role in promoting respect for international

humanitarian law among political and military authorities

or other business enterprises within their sphere of

influence. An understanding of international humanitarian

law is thus an important ingredient in the ability of a

business enterprise to live up to its obligations under the

law and to any commitments it may have under the

various codes of conduct or voluntary initiatives to which

it may have subscribed. An appreciation of the

implications of business operations in the dynamics ofconflict is also key in identifying potentially significant

risks of criminal and civil liability for complicity in

violations of international humanitarian law.


21/28

In countries plagued by armed conflict or by high levels of lawlessness, business enterprises are often compelled to set up

security systems. They may be required by local law to contract

their security services from the government. They may have to

hire private security companies. Or in particular circumstances,

they may choose to resort to rebel forces or other armed groups

to fulfil security roles. Problematically, in some instances, the same

forces contracted to maintain security of a business enterprise

take part in surrounding conflicts and at times violate interna-

tional humanitarian law in the process.

Ordinarily, security personnel retained by business enterprises

must operate in accordance with domestic law as well as with

international law enforcement standards. 17 These standards per-

mit security personnel to use force only when strictly necessary

and in a manner that is proportional to the threat faced. To the

extent that this is within their control, business enterprises should

ensure that security forces protecting their personnel and assets

operate in accordance with domestic law and these standards.

It is possible that business enterprises operating in zones of

armed conflict may be drawn into the conflict. In such circum-

stances their property may become a military objective and the

security personnel defending it also. If this happens and business

operations are attacked by parties to the armed conflict, the use of

force is then regulated by international humanitarian law and theapplicable rules are different. For example, international human-

itarian law does not prohibit the use of lethal force, providing it is

directed against combatants and does not violate other relevant

rules of international humanitarian law (local law may impose

additional limitations). International humanitarian law also stip-

ulates that during armed conflict enemies who surrender may not

be killed, the wounded must be provided with medical treatment

and persons deprived of their liberty must be treated humanely. 18

Torture, inhuman treatment, rape and summary executions are

strictly prohibited under all circumstances. Again, business

enterprises must ensure that the security forces guarding their

employees and assets operate in compliance with the rules of

international humanitarian law.

As stated above, there may be situations where business enterprises

have to hire for their protection the same State or rebel forces that

are participating in conflict. Business enterprises that hire security

or military forces who do not respect the rules of international

humanitarian law while engaged in armed conflict may, undercertain circumstances, be legally liable for assisting the commis-

sion of violations of international humanitarian law, even if they

did not intend the violations to occur and if the offences were not

perpetrated on their behalf. Indeed, because attacking civilians

violates the most basic principle of international humanitarian

law, companies that knowingly engage or collaborate with groups

involved in such actions may run the risk of criminal and civil

liability. In any event, engaging military protection from forces

that do not respect the laws of war is incompatible with an under-

taking to promote international humanitarian law.

Business enterprises must be aware that they face another risk when

operating in conflict zones: if armed forces initially contracted to

protect the facilities of business enterprises subsequently used those

facilities to launch, or defend against, military actions, the infra-

structure and personnel implicated in supporting such military

actions would become military targets.

In addition, business enterprises should take note that they are

limited in the types of weapons that can be used to ensure their

security in times of conflict. Anti-personnel landmines, for example,

are explicitly banned in all situations by the Ottawa Convention 19

because of their indiscriminate effects on civilians. They also

obstruct economic development and reconstruction. Other weapons

that may cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering are

also prohibited.

What does international humanitarian law saywith regard to managing the security of businessoperations?

17 See Article 3 of the Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials, adopted byUN General Assembly Resolution 34/169 of 17 December 1979.

18 Common Article 3 Geneva Conventions; Article 40 Additional Protocol I; Article 75 Additional Protocol I.

19 Ottawa Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transferof Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction, 1997.

21


22/28

Are there rules relating to the acquisitionof assets in situations of conflict?

2

Business enterprises which operate in conflict zones must apply

heightened managerial care to ensure that they are not acquiring

resources and property without the freely given consent of the

owner. They may otherwise be accused of taking part in pillage.

International humanitarian law prohibits pillage, i.e. the unlawful

taking of private property for personal or private use. Pillage is

not limited to the acquisition of assets by force. In the past, courts

have considered the acquisition of assets by entering into contractsas pillage when the agreement was based on threats, intimidation,

pressure, or a position of power derived from the surrounding

armed conflict. In other cases, transfer of company shares based

on fear, management of a business enterprise for the benefit of

individuals other than the owners and knowingly receiving goods

obtained against the will of the true owner were all found to con-

stitute pillage. Thus, when operating in a conflict environment,

business enterprises should be extremely careful about the cir-

cumstances under which they acquire assets.

OBLIGATIONS AND RISKS

R E U T E R

S / P O O L

/ D A N

C H U N

G M D

/ F M

S ,

C O U R T E

S Y


23/28

What does international humanitarian law sayabout labour conditions?

Business enterprises operating in situations of armed conflict face

particular challenges related to the labour conditions of their

workforce. Some companies have been found responsible for

having benefited from the labour of civilians, prisoners of war or

concentration camp detainees to carry out work that did not meet

minimum standards.

Although international humanitarian law does not prohibit States

from compelling certain categories of persons (persons deprived

of their liberty or the civilian population of occupied territories)

to carry out certain types of work, it does not grant this right to

private actors and, in any event, it prohibits uncompensated or

abusive labour. It lays down minimum working conditions and

places limitations on the types of work that such individuals can

be asked to carry out. 20 The precise conditions and limitations

depend on the nature of the armed conflict and the status of the

persons concerned. As a general rule however, they exclude work

that is connected with the armed conflict, unhealthy, dangerous

or humiliating. International humanitarian law also lays down

detailed provisions dealing with working conditions, duration of

labour, pay, and right to compensation for occupational accidents

and medical supervision.

On the issue of labour, the protections in international humani-

tarian law are less comprehensive than those found in the

International Labour Organization Forced Labour Convention

(No. 29) of 1930 also relevant in times of armed conflict

which prohibits forced labour of civilians in most situations.

Business enterprises must, therefore, ensure that no forced labouris associated in any way with their operations.

2320 See Articles 49 - 55 Geneva Convention III; Articles 40, 51 and 95 Geneva Convention IV; Article 5(1)(e) Additional Protocol II.

It may happen that a business enterprise operating in a zoneof armed conflict benefits from a workforce provided andorganized by the authorities. In such situations the managersof the business enterprise should apply heightened managerialcare to identify risks and prevent abuses of this workforce.



24/28

Are there any rules protecting the environmentin times of conflict?

Business enterprises may have an impact on the environment in

a variety of ways, whether directly through their operations or

indirectly through the way their products or services are used. On

the other hand, conflicts often have an undesirable impact on the

environment. Heightened managerial care with regard to envi-

ronmental issues is therefore required from business enterprises

operating in conflict zones.

International humanitarian law contains rules intended to limit

damage to the environment. For instance, it specifically prohibits

forms of warfare that may be expected to cause widespread, long-

term and severe damage to the natural environment.22

Further -more, the rules of international humanitarian law for determining

whether something is a military target also protect the environ-

ment. Incidental environmental consequences of an attack

against a military target must also be considered and weighed

against the military benefit of destroying the target in question.

Moreover, attacking forests or other kinds of plant cover by incen-

diary weapons is prohibited, except when such natural elements

are used to cover, conceal or camouflage combatants or other mil-

itary objectives, or are themselves military objectives.

Business enterprises may be implicated in violating these rules by

selling armed forces the means necessary to carry out attacks that

cause severe damage to the environment. Therefore, business enter-

prises supplying products such as chemical or biological weapons,

or exfoliants that can cause such damage during armed conflict

may face legal proceedings.

Business enterprises may also be held responsible for violations of

international humanitarian law perpetrated against the environ-

ment by providing services. Advising armies on how to engineer

massive oil spills as part of an armed conflict, assisting in the

development of weapons that cause widespread, long-term and

severe damage to the environment or providing armed forces withthe means to do so would be plainly inconsistent with an under-

taking to promote international humanitarian law.

What does international humanitarian law sayon displacement?

4

Business operations sometimes involve obtaining access to resourcesand establishing transport routes in ways that may affect a civil-

ian populations residential or agricultural land. Securing such

access within conflict zones has at times involved the intervention

of warring parties who evicted residents by force.

The taking of private property without due legal process and fair

compensation may amount to pillage (see above). Moreover, inter-

national humanitarian law stipulates that, in situations of occu-

pation or in times of civil war, civilians cannot be forcibly relocated

except in limited circumstances and only temporarily when their

security or imperative military reasons so demand. 21 In this sense,

the expulsion of civilians by armed groups acting on behalf of a

business enterprise cannot be justified. In fact, if such practices

were closely linked to an armed conflict, they could give rise to

significant legal liabilities, both criminal and civil.

21 Article 49 Geneva Convention IV and Article 17(1) Additional Protocol II.22 Article 35(3) Additional Protocol I.



25/28

25


What are the specific risks associated withthe manufacture and trade of weapons?

Armed conflicts feed on the availability of weapons. Business enter-

prises involved in the manufacture and trade of weapons conse-

quently face particular challenges linked to their role in the way

conflicts are fought. Business enterprises involved in the manu-

f acture and trade of weapons may indeed play a part in exacerbating

violations of international humanitarian law.

Several international humanitarian law treaties prohibit the devel-

opment, production and transfer of specific weapons. Manufac -

turers or suppliers may, for example, be liable for trading weapons

such as anti-personnel landmines or biological and chemical

weapons, including poisonous gases. In fact, a number of these

treaties also compel States to take appropriate measures to control

arms transfers and ensure that individuals who engage in illegal

activities are criminally prosecuted.

Production and trade in weapons other than those explicitly pro-

hibited might also give rise to legal liability where the trader know-

ingly supplies weapons to end-users who use them to violate

international humanitarian law. Considerations based on inter-

national humanitarian law are also relevant for products not

traditionally used as weapons, provided that the manufacturers

or suppliers know that the product is to be used to perpetrate

war crimes. An understanding of international humanitarian law and an inter-

est in the conduct of potential purchasers are essential to the risk

management of manufacturers and suppliers of weapons and facil-

itate greater respect for international humanitarian law.

A business enterpri se that supplies a party to an armedconflict with chemicals that were used in the past to commit

violations of international humanitarian law is exposing itselfto the risk of legal liability. The same would apply to a businessenterprise supplying a party to an armed conflict with devicesknown to be part of weapons that have been used in the pastto commit violations of international humanitarian law.

M I L

O S C V E T K

O V I C

/ I C R

C


26/28

What are the risks of liability under internationalhumanitarian law?

In addition to the risk of becoming a military target, business

enterprises operating in conflict zones are exposed to the sur-rounding conflict dynamics. Not only their operations, but also

their personnel, products or services may become part of the

ongoing conflict. In the worst-case scenario, any of these could

result in or facilitate violations of international humanitar ian law.

Business enterprises therefore run legal risks, whether based on

criminal responsibility for the commission of or complicity in

war crimes or on civil liability for damages. The nature, implica-

tions and extent of these risks are of particular importance to

business enterprises operating in conflict zones.

International humanitarian law states that not only perpetrators,

but also their superiors and accomplices may be held criminally

responsible for the commission of war crimes. Of these forms of

commission, complicity is likely to be the most relevant to business

enterprises.

An accomplice is someone who provides practical assistance, moral

support or encouragement that has a substantial effect on the

commission of a war crime. The accomplice must have had some

knowledge that providing the assistance or support would facil-

itate the crime.

Some countries have passed national legislation that permits

business enterprises to be held responsible for the commission of,

and complicity in, war crimes. Moreover, the managers of busi-

ness enterprises may face prosecution in a personal capacity. The

fact that a manager acted on behalf of a business enterprise does

not provide any sort of immunity from prosecution for interna-

tional crimes. In addition, because all States have an obligation to

investigate and prosecute certain war crimes irrespective of where

the acts occurred, business enterprises or their managers may face

proceedings in countries other than those in which they operate.

Business enterprises should therefore not discount the possibility

of legal proceedings simply because the country where they are

operating is unlikely to conduct criminal investigations or inca-

pable of doing so. The risk of corporate and individual responsi-

bility for crimes perpetrated in the context of an armed conflict is

thus an element of growing importance in a business enterprise's

assessment of the range of risks associated with its activities dur-

ing an armed conflict.

Finally, business enterprises and their managers also face the risk

of civil liabil ity. While criminal law seeks to punish individuals for

war crimes, civil liability allows victims to seek compensation for

damages. More particularly, civil liability enables individuals

claiming to have suffered as a result of the wrongdoing of a busi-

ness enterprise, for example, to seek compensation from national

courts. Civil litigation is increasingly perceived as being a viable

way of redressing violations of international humanitarian law by

business enterprises, as civil cases can be brought directly by indi-

vidual victims and the standard of proof is lower than that

required in a criminal trial.

6


An arms dealer who sells w eapons to a cl ient knowing thatthe weapons are to be used to commit war crimes is complicit in

the crimes, regardless of whether he or she shares the clientsmotivations. Similarly, the provision on a commercial basis

of logistical support that is likely to facilitate the commissionof violations of international humanitarian law may attract

legal liability.


27/28


28/28

0 8 8 2

/ 0 0 2

1 2

/ 2 0 0 6

2

, 0 0 0

International Committee of the Red Cross19 Avenue de la Paix1202 Geneva, SwitzerlandT + 41 22 734 60 01 F + 41 22 733 20 57

Products with a 100% FSC label comef f t tifi d ti g th

M I

S S I

O N

S T A T

E M

E N T

T h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l C o m m i t t e e o f t h e R e d C r o s s ( I C R C )

i s a n i m p a r t i a l , n e u t r a l a n d i n d e p e n d e n t o r g a n i z a t i o n w h o s e e x c l u s i v e l y

h u m a n i t a r i a n m i s s i o n i s t o p r o t e c t t h e l i v e s a n d d i g n i t y o f p e r s o n s

a f f e c t e d b y a r m e d c o n f l i c t o r i n t e r n a l d i s t u r b a n c e s

a n d t o p r o v i d e t h e m w i t h a s s i s t a n c e .

I t d i r e c t s a n d c o o r d i n a t e s t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l r e l i e f a c t i v i t i e s c o n d u c t e d

b y t h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l R e d C r o s s a n d R e d C r e s c e n t M o v e m e n t m e a n i n g

t h e I C R C , t h e N a t i o n a l R e d C r o s s o r R e d C r e s c e n t S o c i e t i e s

a n d t h e i r F e d e r a t i o n i n s i t u a t i o n s o f c o n f l i c t .

I t a l s o e n d e a v o u r s t o p r e v e n t s u f f e r i n g b y p r o m o t i n g a n d s t r e n g t h e n i n g

i n t e r n a t i o n a l h u m a n i t a r i a n l a w a n d u n i v e r s a l h u m a n i t a r i a n p r i n c i p l e s .

E s t a b l i s h e d i n 1 8 6 3 , t h e I C R C i s a t t h e o r i g i n o f

t h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l R e d C r o s s a n d R e d C r e s c e n t M o v e m e n t .

ICRC on IHL and Business

Documents

Transcript of ICRC on IHL and Business