Hyperpolarized He and perfluorocarbon gas diffusion MRI of ...saam/reprints/Hediffrev.pdf1...
Transcript of Hyperpolarized He and perfluorocarbon gas diffusion MRI of ...saam/reprints/Hediffrev.pdf1...
Hyperpolarized 3He and perfluorocarbon gas diffusion MRI of lungs
Mark S. Conradi a,b,*, Brian T. Saam c, Dmitriy A. Yablonskiy a,b, Jason C. Woods a,b
a Department of Physics, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USAb Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63110, USAc Department of Physics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Received 7 October 2005
Available online 10 March 2006
Keywords: Diffusion; Imaging; Hyperpolarized; 3He; Lungs
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
1.1. Hyperpolarization of 3He . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
1.2. Using HP 3He in MRI experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
1.3. Rapid imaging of ventilation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
1.4. Low-field imaging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
1.5. Determination of regional oxygen partial pressure (pO2) in the lung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
2. 3He restricted diffusion measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
2.1. Diffusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
2.2. Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
2.3. Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
3. Fundamental measurement of 3He gas anisotropic diffusion in human lung and evaluation of lung microstructure . . . . . . . . . . 70
3.1. Theory of 3He gas anisotropic diffusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
3.2. Relationship between 3He gas ADC and airway size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
3.3. Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
3.4. Preliminary findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
4. Magnetization tagging and long-range diffusivity of 3He . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4.1. Lung structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4.2. Diffusion at long distances in lung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4.3. Spatial modulation of longitudinal magnetization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4.4. Long-range diffusion in lungs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
4.5. In vivo Imaging of Dsec in dogs with unilateral emphysema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
4.6. Imaging Dsec in explanted human lungs with emphysema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
4.7. In vivo Imaging of Dsec in humans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
5. Fluorine-19 ADC measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
5.1. Rationale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
5.2. Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
5.3. Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
5.4. Transition to human imaging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
0079-6565/$ - see front matter q 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2005.12.001
* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Physics, Washington
University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA. Tel.: C1 314 935 6418.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M.S. Conradi).
1. Introduction
A remarkable development at the interface of physics and
biomedical science over the past 10 years has been the use of
hyperpolarized (HP) noble gases to perform MRI of the lung
Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–83
www.elsevier.com/locate/pnmrs
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–8364
air space. Such imaging is made possible through laser-optical
pumping, which can improve the magnetic resonance
sensitivity of certain noble-gas isotopes having non-zero
nuclear spin by several orders of magnitude. The two most
important isotopes are the spin one-half nuclei 3He and 129Xe,
because of their long intrinsic T1 relaxation times. We recall
that the conventional thermal polarization Pth in an applied
magnetic field B0 is given by PthZmB0/kBT, where m is the
nuclear magnetic moment, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and T
is the absolute temperature in Kelvins. For fully relaxed
protons in a conventional 1.5 T applied field for whole-body
MRI, we have PthZ6!10K6, which suffices for magnetic
resonance (MR) imaging of protons in water. Gases delivered
at pressures of z1 atm are over 2000 times less dense than
protons in water with a corresponding decrease in MR
sensitivity, but hyperpolarization yields an enhancement of 4
to 5 orders of magnitude (PhypZ10–50%), more than
compensating for the density difference. Indeed, highly
polarized 3He can remain sufficiently sensitive to MRI even
if it constitutes only a fraction of the inhaled gas mixture. Once
introduced in vivo to the lungs, depending on the breathing
maneuver and the inhaled mixture, HP gases relax with a time
T1Z20–30 s, where the relaxation is dominated by interaction
with paramagnetic oxygen. In the glass cell used for
hyperpolarization, T1 values are much longer, ranging from
20 to 40 h.
Because the function of the lung is gas exchange, it is hardly
surprising that regionally specific information about inspired
gas should be at least as relevant to the study of lung
physiology and disease as images of the lung-tissue structure
(e.g. hydrogen MRI or X-ray CT). Results from several
research groups have indeed demonstrated the potential for
HP-gas MRI to enhance our understanding of lung function,
with further potential impact on disease treatment, surgical
planning, and drug development. (Lung diseases such as
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma
affect tens of millions of people in the US alone [1]). Almost
immediately from the time that the first animal- and then
human-lung images were demonstrated [2–5], several groups
have explored pulse-sequence techniques and contrast mech-
anisms that go well beyond static spin-density imaging and that
make use of the unique physical properties of these gases to
address physiologically relevant questions.
This article deals largely with one such contrast mechanism:
diffusion (i.e. Brownian motion) of gas in the lung. Rapid gas
diffusion can cause problems ranging from limited image
resolution to signal attenuation due to the presence of bulk
susceptibility and/or imaging gradients. However, as with
relaxation due to the presence of oxygen (see below), there is a
flip side to the story that enables meaningful physiological
information to be obtained. Indeed, an early conclusion in HP3He MRI, based on the fact that diffusion does not limit signal
intensity or resolution as much as might be expected, was that
airway and alveolar boundaries restrict the diffusive motion of3He in healthy lung [6,7]. The apparent diffusion coefficient
(ADC) of the gas can thus be a powerful indicator of local
airway and alveolar architecture, which is itself often
profoundly affected by lung disorders, such as COPD [8].
Most of the imaging discussed here involves HP 3He, as it
has been most widely used to date in studies of lung ADC.
However, we also consider in this regard other gases that may
be used as MRI signal sources. Other noble-gas isotopes
(principally 129Xe) can be hyperpolarized and have been used
for lung imaging [9]. Although 129Xe has only 1/3 the magnetic
moment of 3He and has generally been more technically
challenging to polarize in large quantities, it provides unique
contrast in that it is taken up by the blood from the lung and
exhibits a wide chemical shift range when dissolved in a
variety of tissues [10]. The excitement generated by HP-gas
MRI has also contributed to a renewed interest in the use of
inert fluorinated gases to image the lungs [11,12]; these gases
have a number of features that somewhat mitigate the
disadvantage of a small (thermally generated) nuclear
polarization, and they are technically easier to handle and
use, particularly for in vivo studies.
Before turning exclusively to diffusion MRI, we will first
briefly discuss how hyperpolarized gas is generated and
imaged. We will also highlight (though by no means
exhaustively), some of the developments in the last 10 years
across the field of lung imaging with HP gases. More complete
reviews of the field may be found in Refs. [13,14]. The
subsequent sections on diffusion MRI are based largely on
research done by the group at Washington University, where it
has been a major effort for the past 8 years. We will start with
how simple measurements of 3He ADC can be used to gauge
the regional severity of tissue destruction due to emphysema.
We then discuss a more detailed model of airway architecture
that can be tested by investigating 3He diffusion anisotropy.
The fact that gases diffuse so rapidly affords the opportunity to
explore lung structure on many different length scales, and the
next section discusses experiments to measure long-range 3He
diffusion in the lung. Finally, we present some recent work
involving 19F diffusion MRI.
1.1. Hyperpolarization of 3He
3He is a stable non-radioactive isotope of helium with
nuclear spin 1/2 and a gyromagnetic ratio about 25% smaller
than the proton; it has z1 ppm natural abundance but is
available in pure form as the result of collection from tritium
decay. The nucleus can be polarized to values approaching
unity by transfer of angular momentum from circularly
polarized laser light. There are two basic schemes for this
transfer: metastability-exchange optical pumping (MEOP)
[15,16] and spin-exchange optical pumping (SEOP) [17]. In
both schemes, the 3He gas typically resides in a glass vessel
(cell) through which the laser light is directed. In MEOP, a
radio-frequency discharge is ignited in the cell to create a
population of 3He atoms in the triplet-2S metastable electron
state. Optical pumping with 1083 nm laser light, corresponding
to transitions from the triplet-2S to certain triplet-2P states,
leads to a large electron polarization in the metastable state,
which is immediately transferred to the nucleus via hyperfine
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–83 65
coupling. Rapid electron-exchange collisions then produce
nuclear polarized 3He atoms in the ground state. In SEOP, an
alkali metal (usually rubidium) serves as an intermediary in the
angular momentum-transfer process. Laser light is absorbed by
the Rb vapor at a wavelength of 795 nm, corresponding to the
first principal dipole transition (5S1/2K5P1/2), causing the Rb
valence electron to become highly polarized. A density of Rb
vapor appropriate to the amount of available laser light is
produced in the cell by heating it to 160–200 8C. The angular
momentum is then transferred to the 3He nucleus via a
hyperfine interaction (zero-quantum transition) that takes place
during Rb–3He binary collisions. In both methods, the
mechanism for polarization transfer is easily turned off (in
MEOP by terminating the discharge and in SEOP by cooling
down the cell and condensing the Rb vapor), leaving the
angular momentum stored in the form of polarized 3He nuclei.
The longitudinal relaxation time of the gas (usually dominated
by collisions with the cell walls) can, with some attention given
to how the cell is fabricated, be many 10 s of hours, allowing
sufficient time for storage and transport of the hyperpolarized
gas to an MRI scanner. We note that the SEOP method can also
be used to hyperpolarize the other stable and abundant spin-1/2
noble-gas isotope, 129Xe.
Generally speaking, MEOP has historically had the
advantage of an intrinsically faster production rate and largest
maximum 3He polarization, routinely producing quantitiesw1
STP-liter/hour at O60% polarization [18]. However, the RF
discharge requires that the gas be polarized at pressures
w1 Torr and then compressed to atmospheric pressures without
causing significant polarization loss [19]. In addition, the lasers
used in MEOP have been somewhat more expensive and more
difficult to maintain. Initial large-scale polarization systems
have been large and expensive, but much more portable and
inexpensive MEOP systems have been recently demonstrated
[20]. By contrast, SEOP systems have the advantage of cheap
powerful portable lasers and the ability to operate at helium
pressures between 1 and 10 atmbut a slower intrinsic production
rate; a typical system requiresmany hours to produce 1STP-liter
of HP 3He [21]. SEOP is a photon-limited process, and the
introduction in the 1990s of compact inexpensive diode-laser
arrays, capable of several tens of watts at 795 nm, was a crucial
technological advance that allowed the production of quantities
of HP 3He sufficient for human-lung MRI. Recently, the
simultaneous use of both rubidium and potassium metals in a
SEOP cell has been shown to improve the HP 3He production
rate by an order of magnitude [22]. Combined with ever more
powerful lasers, which can nowbe frequency-narrowed to better
match the alkali-metal absorption profile [23], this so-called
‘hybrid’ SEOP has reduced the gap in intrinsic production
capacity relative to schemes employing MEOP.
1.2. Using HP 3He in MRI experiments
The major technical difference in the use of HP gases in
MRI, as compared to conventional thermal signal sources, is
that the magnetization is independent of the applied magnetic
field and does not recover thermally. Rather, it continually
decays towards a negligibly small thermal-equilibrium value.
Even before being administered to a subject, HP gas must be
handled carefully in order to avoid catastrophic relaxation due
to interactions with foreign surfaces, molecular oxygen [24],
magnetic-field gradients [25], and ambient fluctuating mag-
netic fields. The gas is usually kept in a glass cell that is known
to result in a wall-relaxation time (10 s of hours) that is
sufficiently long. The cell is positioned in a solenoid or similar
homogeneous alignment field, preferably with external
electromagnetic shielding. The gas is typically released from
the cell to a flexible plastic enclosure from which the subject
inhales just prior to imaging. Subjects typically breathe in an
anoxic mixture containing HP 3He, perhaps with a subsequent
inhalation of room air, in order to maximally avoid oxygen-
induced relaxation [24].
An inhaled bolus of HP 3He possesses all of its useable
magnetization from the outset, and this magnetization must be
rationed appropriately over the number of images acquired and
according to the k-space-traversal scheme employed. There is
also a strong desire to use as much of the hard-won
magnetization as efficiently as possible. Since there is no
thermal recovery, imaging speed is limited only by gradient-
switching speed and available receiver bandwidth. Spin echo
sequences are generally avoided, because use of a large number
of inexact 1808 rf pulses would eventually tip most of the non-
renewable magnetization into the transverse plane where it
would dephase rapidly. The use of gradient-recalled echoes
(GRE) combined with low-flip-angle excitation (e.g. the
FLASH sequence [26]) was the canonical choice for early
work in this field. The disadvantage of using GRE sequences is
that the transverse magnetization is limited by T�2 . Although T�
2
is longer for 3He in the gas space than for protons in lung tissue
[27], it is still limited to about 20 ms at 1.5 T by the magnetic
susceptibility effects of the large air–tissue interface in the lung
[28,29]. In addition, rapid diffusion of 3He through the imaging
gradients themselves can also contribute to transverse-signal
attenuation [30].
1.3. Rapid imaging of ventilation
Much of the early progress in lung imaging with HP 3He
came in the form of improved resolution in static images of
ventilation at breath-hold. A two-dimensional FLASH
sequence was typically employed for human imaging, with
in-plane resolution of a few millimeter and total acquisition
times of about 1 s [31]. As spectacular as these early images
were, it could be argued that much of the same information
might be obtained with other, less technically demanding
methods, e.g. the use of inert fluorinated gases or oxygen-
enhanced MRI of lung parenchyma. However, the large single-
shot signal intensity and the absence of any recovery-time
limitation afforded by HP gas make it uniquely suitable for
imaging the dynamics of gas flow. Imaging ventilation in real
time during the breathing cycle requires more efficient use of
the transverse magnetization through short effective echo times
and/or multiple-echo sequences. Johnson and co-workers
extensively developed the use of radial k-space acquisition
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–8366
(RA) and projection reconstruction with HP 3He in small
animals [32,33]. Although they consume somewhat larger
amounts of magnetization (not as much of a problem with
small animals as with humans), RA sequences have very short
effective echo-times, which minimize susceptibility and
diffusion losses, and they oversample near kZ0, which tends
to minimize motion artifacts (e.g., from heartbeat). Rapid
repetitive imaging of the human lung [30] was first
demonstrated using echo-planar imaging (EPI) [34], whereby
the transverse magnetization from one excitation is repeatedly
refocused by sinusoidal read-out gradients to acquire succes-
sive lines in k-space. Saam et al. [30] showed that in the low-
flip-angle limit, an increase in linear voxel dimension leads to a
sixth-power increase in the number of images that can be
acquired with one bolus of inhaled HP gas. The larger voxel
size also significantly reduces the signal attenuation due to
diffusion through the correspondingly smaller imaging
gradients. Using a coarse-grid (32!64) two-dimensional EPI
sequence, they were able to acquire an image from a single rf
excitation every 40 ms. These images showed gas filling the
lung, the gravitational dependence of ventilation, and some
washout characteristics. There were some artifacts, mostly due
to susceptibility effects around the pulmonary vessels. The use
of segmented EPI, where only a limited number of echoes are
acquired per excitation, can reduce artifacts at the cost of using
more magnetization. In spiral-acquisition scanning [35,36], as
with RA, the effective echo time is short; each view starts at the
center of k-space but spirals outward to the edge of the plane.
Since a given spiral provides a more uniform sampling of
k-space than a single radial acquisition, the entire image can be
updated after each acquisition by combining it with some
number of previous interleaved acquisitions (k-space window-
ing technique). Salerno et al. [36] generated images of
inspiration with an effective temporal resolution of 15 ms
and produced spectacular cine loops of inflowing inspired gas
in both healthy subjects and patients with cystic fibrosis.
1.4. Low-field imaging
Because the magnetization in HP gases is independent of the
applied field, one expects the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) to be
approximately independent of applied field in the regime where
noise from the sample dominates coil noise (true for chest MRI
down to fields of 0.1 T and even lower) [37]. For lung imaging,
low fields should be particularly advantageous since they
reduce the magnetic susceptibility gradients in the lung [38].
Durand and co-workers have imaged human lungs at 100 mT
[39], taking advantage of very long transverse coherence times
to use a single-shot multiple-spin-echo pulse sequence (RARE)
[40], for which acquisition of the multiple CPMG echoes is
limited by (the much longer) T2 instead of T�2 . Mair and co-
workers have recently demonstrated human lung images in an
open-access very low-field (!5 mT) system [41]. These
systems are generally not commercially engineered, and
there are some difficulties unique to low-field imaging,
including low-frequency noise and undesirable gradients
concomitant to the imaging gradients that can cause image
artifacts [42,43]. The overall image quality is improving but
has yet to rival what has been achieved at high fields.
1.5. Determination of regional oxygen partial pressure (pO2)
in the lung
The presence of molecular oxygen is generally considered a
limitation for HP-gas MRI, because it causes rapid relaxation
of the gas and is, in fact, the dominant relaxation mechanism in
the lung in vivo. However, Deninger et al. [44] have
demonstrated the use of this relaxation mechanism to quantify
regional oxygen partial pressure (pO2) in the lung, by
measuring regional differences in relaxation rate of inspired3He gas. Later adaptations of this technique [45] have been
used to assess in porcine lung the regional ventilation-
perfusion ratio (VA/Q), an important physiological parameter
for characterizing lung disease [46].
2. 3He restricted diffusion measurements
2.1. Diffusion
Any discussion of 3He MR measurements of restricted
diffusivity in lungs necessarily involves the disease pulmonary
emphysema [8]. In emphysema, the average size of the
compartments which restrict the gas motion is enlarged and
the restricting barriers (alveolar walls) become more porous,
leading to an increase in the apparent diffusion coefficient
(ADC). In the opinion of our group, 3He ADC measurements
for mapping the extent and severity of emphysema in human
lungs (in vivo) is the application of hyperpolarized gas imaging
which is most likely to find widespread clinical application. It
appears that this opinion is shared by a majority of the field
[47].
In healthy human lungs, there are approximately 300
million alveoli, the smallest subdivisions of the air space
[48]. Each alveolus is an open vessel of approximately 300 mmdiameter (0.3 mm). The alveolarized space accounts for about
93% of the total gas volume. In emphysema, the compartments
are enlarged by destruction of elastin, the protein responsible
for the elastic tension (spring return) of the lung. Destruction of
alveolar walls also results in fewer compartments. Fig. 1
presents microscope images of healthy and emphysematous
lung tissue at the same scale (after excision, freezing, sampling,
and slicing of thin sections), demonstrating the changes in lung
microstructure in emphysema. So, at the broadest level,
emphysematous lungs have fewer and larger compartments;
therefore one expects (and finds) the ADC of 3He gas to
increase in emphysema, being less restricted [49]. A more
sophisticated and anatomically correct picture of lung structure
is presented in the next section. It is important to remark that3He ADC is sensitive to and reports upon features of sizes
much smaller than the image resolution. This aspect of
diffusion or q-space imaging has been noted previously [50].
The free diffusivity D0 of3He gas dilute in N2 or air has been
measured to be 0.88 cm2/s [51]. Typically, a bolus of
approximately 0.45 l STP 3He is mixed with sufficient N2
Fig. 1. Microscope images at 5! of tissues fixed at inflation from healthy (H) and emphysematous (E) lungs. The larger characteristic dimensions in the
emphysematous tissue are evident and result in less restriction to gas diffusion.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–83 67
(0.55–1.55 l) for a breathhold; thus, in a lung of 6 l total
capacity, the 3He concentration is about 7%, close to the
infinite dilution limit for D0. The gradient pulses employed are
typically tZ2 ms in duration (we note that these are long
gradient pulses, so the time interval across which the
displacement is measured is not well defined) [50]. In this
time interval, the root mean square free displacement in one
direction isffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi2D0t
por 600 mm (0.6 mm). This is much larger
than the alveolar size, indicating that the gas atoms will do a
thorough exploration of the airway and nearby alveoli during
the diffusion measurements. Thus 3He diffusive motion in
healthy lungs is expected to be highly restricted: that is, the
ADC will be a small fraction of D0. For a heavier, larger gas
species such as xenon or C2F6 or C3F8 (see Section 5), the
smaller D0 makes the situation somewhat different (less
restricted).
2.2. Method
The MRI measurement of 3He ADC uses a gradient-echo
version of the famous Stejskal-Tanner pulsed field gradient
sequence [52]. Because the hyperpolarized 3He spin magne-
tization is not renewable, rf p-pulses are to be avoided, as
discussed above. The pulse sequence is shown in Fig. 2. The
bipolar diffusion sensitizing gradient (BDSG) is omitted to
make an unweighted image and is present to make the diffusion
weighted image. The timings of the two (with and without
Fig. 2. Pulse sequence for measuring 3He ADC using a gradient echo with two
values of b (one is bZ0). Here, b is the diffusion-sensitizing gradient weight.
The bipolar diffusion sensitizing gradient pulse (BDSG) is detailed at right. The
time durations used here are tZ500 ms, dZ1800 ms, and DZ1800 ms. At left,
only the bs0 acquisition is shown; the bs0 and bZ0 acquisitions (with
BDSG pulse at zero amplitude) are taken alternately.
BDSG) are held the same, so that the only difference between
the two resulting images is diffusion weighting. Typical time
durations of the features of the BDSG are given in Fig. 2.
For a fixed quantity of hyperpolarized gas, the imaging time
and S/N of multi-slice two-dimensional and three-dimensional
acquisitions are predicted to be the same (for n partitions in
three-dimensional, each spin is subjected to n times as many rf
pulses as for n-slice two-dimensional acquisitions, so the
nutation angle must be 1=ffiffiffin
pas large, in the small-angle limit;
the smaller S/N of each echo is exactly compensated by the
signal averaging effect of n times as many echoes). We have
chosen multi-slice two-dimensional acquisitions to minimize
motion effects, as each slice is acquired in about 0.7 s, for 32
phase encodes and two values of the BDSG.
The BDSG occupies a time interval in the sequence during
which the imaging gradients are fully rewound (slice select) or
not yet applied (phase encode and readout). Likewise, the
BDSG is fully rewound to kZ0 or not yet applied when the
imaging gradients are applied. Thus, there are no cross terms
between the BDSG and the imaging gradients and analysis of
the data is simplified.
The two images, with (W) and without (WO) the BDSG, are
generated simultaneously as much as possible, to avoid
artifacts from bulk motion, either patient motion or incomplete
breathhold. This means acquiring the same phase encode in the
same slice, with and without, in immediate succession (about
11 ms apart). So the order of operations from largest to smallest
is slice, phase encode, with and without BDSG.
In our earliest work, we worried about the influence of bulk
motion, which should be approximated well as constant
velocity over the duration (2–4 ms) of the BDSG [49]. To
eliminate attenuation from constant velocity motion of the
spins, a gradient pulse of structure CKKC was used. For
constant velocity motion (but not stochastic or diffusive
motion), the phase shift generated by the first half of the
gradient waveform (CK) is cancelled by the phase shift from
the second half waveform (KC). Compared to a BDSG of the
simplerCK structure with the same duration of each lobe, the
CKKC pulse has twice the overall duration and only twice
the b-value (see below). Compared to a CK pulse of the
doubled duration which would have an 8! larger value of b,
the (CKKC) pulse is inefficient. We abandoned use of the
velocity compensated pulse (CKKC) to allow data
Fig. 3. Coronal 3He ventilation (gray) and restricted diffusion (color) images of
a 22 kg Yorkshire pig. The slice thickness is 10 mm. The gas diffusion in the
bulk of this healthy lung is much smaller than the unrestricted diffusion evident
in the trachea (largest airway).
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–8368
acquisition with shorter gradient echo times (TE) of 7.2 ms,
because there was no evidence of artifacts with the simpler
CK pulse (see below). We note that gas diffusion is about 104
larger than for water, so b-values for gases need be only 10K4
as large, making measurement of gaseous diffusion compara-
tively easy.
The mean squared displacement hDx2i for motion at constant
velocity V is V2t2 while for purely diffusive motion hDx2iZ2Dt.
Thus, at sufficiently short times, the diffusive displacements are
always larger than those from constant velocity motion. For
example, in a typical time of 2 ms with a restricted diffusivity
of 0.20 cm2/s as measured in healthy human lungs [49], the
root mean square displacement is about 0.3 mm. This
corresponds to a large constant velocity of 150 mm/s. At
breathhold, velocities in the lung and chest cavity are likely to
be a very small fraction of this. The calculation suggests that
compensation for constant velocity motions is not required. We
further note that constant velocity motion of all the spins in a
voxel, as in patient chest motion, would give rise to an overall
phase shift from the BDSG but no attenuation. However,
incomplete breathhold would cause a non-uniform flow
velocity and therefore would result in signal attenuation.
Analysis of the diffusion data is simple. The only difference
between the two images is diffusive attenuation, so for each
voxel
Iw=Iwo Z eKbD (1)
so that
D Z ð1=bÞlnðIwo=IwÞ: (2)
Here the value of b, the weight of the diffusion-sensitizing
gradient, is bZg2G2d2Df, where the times d and D are defined
in Fig. 2, f is a dimensionless number determined by the BDSG
pulse shape, and G is the amplitude of the BDSG. Often there
are regions of lung that ventilate poorly and receive too little3He so that the S/N is inadequate. To eliminate such voxels
from the diffusion map, a lower intensity limit of 2.5 times the
average noise level is used on both raw images, with (W) and
without (WO) the BDSG. Voxels falling below this level are
presented as gray; for all other voxels, diffusion is presented on
a color scale.
Fig. 4. Transverse-slice 3He images of a healthy volunteer (H) and a patient
with severe emphysema (E). The gray-scale images show the distribution of
inspired 3He at breathhold and the color images are maps of restricted
diffusivity. In the emphysematous lungs, the gas distribution is less uniform and
the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is much larger.
2.3. Results
Fig. 3, left, presents a coronal slice ventilation or spin-
density image of a 22 kg Yorkshire pig together with the
apparent diffusivity on the right. The animal was deeply
anesthesized so that an external ventilator was used until the
bolus of 3He and N2 was administered manually; a complete
breathhold was affected by closing the valve in series with the
tracheal insert tube. The diffusion map demonstrates that the
gas diffusivity is highly restricted (D/D0%0.2) everywhere
except in the large airways. In the trachea, D is essentially
equal to D0 (0.88 cm2/s), with some smaller airways evident as
less enhanced D through the partial volume effect (airway is
thinner than image slice). The uniformity of D in the rest of the
lung shows the excellent S/N here.
Ventilation (left) and restricted diffusivity (right) images
from a healthy volunteer (H) and a patient with severe
emphysema (E) are presented in Fig. 4. Like most of our human
images, these are transverse (axial) slices to permit easy
comparison with X-ray CT images, which are presently
considered the gold standard radiological technique for
characterizing emphysema. The ventilation or spin density
image of the emphysema patient is considerably less uniform in
intensity than for the healthy lungs. Some of the intensity
variation in the image of the healthy volunteer is due to a
spatial dependence of the sensitivity of the homebuilt rf coils.
The diffusivity maps do not suffer from the rf inhomogeneity,
because they use a ratiometric method as in Eq. (2). The images
clearly show the restriction of diffusion in the healthy lungs,
with D/D0 of about 0.22. In the emphysematous lungs, the
diffusivity is substantially increased and is spatially dependent.
The spatial variations in D follow the pattern one expects by
comparison to X-ray CT (not shown), with regions of low
Fig. 6. 3He images of ventilation and ADC in two emphysema patients, top and
bottom. As discussed in the text, poor ventilation does not always accompany
elevated ADC, and well-ventilated regions can display unexpectedly high
ADC. The color scale is the same as in Fig. 4.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–83 69
X-ray attenuation (and hence low tissue density) having high3He diffusion. Comprehensive quantitative comparison of CT
and 3He diffusion, performed by identifying the same region of
lung in the two image sets, finds a strong correlation between
these quantities [53].
A histogram of diffusivity in 15 healthy volunteers and 33
patients with severe emphysema is presented in Fig. 5. The
peak value of D in healthy lungs is near 0.20 cm2/s and is
surprisingly narrow given the number of subjects. The peak
from emphysematous subjects is greatly elevated and much
broader, presumably reflecting a range of disease severity. The
inescapable conclusion is that 3He diffusivity cleanly separates
healthy and severely emphysematous lungs. An open question
is how early emphysema can be detected and over how short of
a time span its progress can be measured using 3He ADC; this
last question is particularly relevant to testing the efficacy of
new drugs that target emphysema.
Spin-density and diffusion images from two patients with
severe emphysema appear in Fig. 6. The images demonstrate
that spin-density or ventilation images and diffusivity maps
report different aspects of structure and function of the lungs.
That is, they deliver independent information. In general, one
expects that the most diseased lung regions will have the
poorest ventilation (because of air trapping) and the highest3He diffusivity. Indeed, this is true in many cases. In
emphysema patients with a history of cigarette smoking (but
not alpha-one disease [8]), we commonly find the ventilation
decreases and ADC increases from bottom to top (inferior to
superior) of the lung, the usual direction of increasing extent of
disease. But the upper two panels of Fig. 6 show a counter-
example. There in the right lung (at left in the figure), a region
of poor ventilation nevertheless shows only moderately
elevated ADC (yellow). In another counter-example at bottom
of Fig. 6, there is a well-ventilated region of right lung (at lower
left in the figure) that has very high ADC (blue). Thus, the
distribution of gas at breathhold and the ADC report on
Fig. 5. Histogram of restricted diffusivity ADC in healthy (H) and
emphysematous (E) lungs, taken from data on normal volunteers and patients
with severe emphysema. The vertical scale is proportional to the number of
imaging voxels at each ADC. The (H) and (E) distributions are well separated.
different aspects of the lung; the two kinds of images report
distinct information.
Fig. 6 is a good example of non-uniform ventilation,
showing that most severely emphysematous lungs contain
regions that ventilate so poorly that they receive inadequate3He for the diffusion measurement (i.e. inadequate S/N). To
some extent, having the patient rebreathe the 3He–N2 gas
mixture in and out of a flexible vessel (plastic bag) reduces this
effect. But strict limits should be placed on the total time
breathing an anoxic mixture for patients with severe disease.
With some patients, the distribution of inhaled 3He is so non-
uniform that the images ‘do not look like lungs’.
Other groups and our own have examined the dependence of
the measured diffusivity on several factors, including age
within a pool of healthy subjects, the level of lung inflation, the
direction of the BDS gradient, and the time duration of the BDS
gradient pulse [54]. Studies indicate an excellent reproduci-
bility of 3He diffusion results for repeated measurements on a
subject [55,56]. There appears to be little or no dependence on
diffusion direction (global anisotropy, quite distinct from the
microscopic anisotropy discussed in Section 3) [57]. The
diffusivity in healthy subjects decreases slowly with increasing
diffusion time [54], from 0.22 to 0.15 cm2/s for diffusion times
of 1.8 to 5.8 ms (note that much longer diffusion times of order
seconds give much smaller diffusion coefficients, as discussed
in Section 4). While we have not carefully studied the
dependence of D upon the level of inflation, it appears that D
increases with lung volume (total volume of gas in lung), but
more slowly than we expected, with the mean diffusivity
increasing about 25% between a tidal inhalation (functional
residual capacity plus 0.7 l) to a full inhalation (total lung
volume), an approximate doubling of the lung volume.
Fig. 7. Schematic structure of two levels of respiratory airways. Open spheres
represent alveoli forming an alveolar sleeve around each airway. Each
respiratory airway can be considered geometrically as a cylindrical object
consisting of a tube embedded in the alveolar sleeve. The diagram defines inner
(r) and outer (R) radii (as in Fig. 1 in Ref. [65]). Inset schematically represents
the structure of the same airways in emphysema, scaled down for clarity.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–8370
It is not yet clear what spatial resolution is required to
obtain a clear picture of the extent and severity of
emphysema in each patient. Our diffusion maps generally
show trends from top to bottom and/or variations between
lobes, suggesting that the fairly large voxels we use in vivo
(7!7!10 mm3) are still much smaller than the relevant
length scales of the variation of disease severity. While one
might think to always obtain images at a better resolution
(smaller voxels) than needed and then simply average
voxels to obtain fewer, larger cells for better S/N, this
procedure (i) results in inferior S/N and (ii) requires extra
imaging and breathhold time, compared to simply imaging
at the desired, coarser resolution in the first place. The
wasting of imaging time is obvious, with extra slices and
extra phase encodes to acquire. The S/N argument can be
derived from general equations [37] of the signal-to-noise in
MR imaging, but we present here a quick version. We
compare the S/N of the entire imaging field obtained by (a)
imaging with M!N!P voxels (either in three-dimensional
or multi-slice two-dimensional, because they give equal S/N
here as remarked earlier) or (b) a non-imaging measurement
(i.e. a single-voxel experiment). We recall that the
integrated intensity of all voxels in an entire image is
given by the amplitude of the kZ0 datum; all other
k-values do not enter into the sum across all voxels. Thus,
the imaging approach (a) must use MNP rf pulses so each
rf pulse is of nutation angle a, of order 1=ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiMNP
pradians, to
consume most of the 3He magnetization throughout the
many rf pulses. The non-imaging measurement (b) can use
a single rf pulse of 908, or approximately aZ1 radian.
Thus, the kZ0 datum of the imaging approach has a
smaller S/N by 1=ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiMNP
p; hence, for obtaining only the kZ0
point which gives the spatial integral across the entire
sample, the non-imaging approach is superior. The same
argument can be generalized to show that higher S/N is
obtained when the imaging is performed at the desired
resolution, as opposed to imaging at a higher-than-needed
resolution and averaging voxels afterwards. Thus, it is
important to decide on an optimum spatial resolution, based
on the characteristics of the disease.
Besides in vivo measurements on healthy volunteers
and patients with emphysema, we have obtained images
of restricted diffusion in canine lungs [58,59] (using
elastase-treated dogs) and from emphysematous human
lungs excised after lung transplant surgery [60]. The dogs
were imaged after each of three elastase treatments; after
the final treatment and 3He imaging, the dogs were
sacrificed and the lungs were removed, frozen, and sliced
thin for observation under the microscope. The surface
area to volume ratio S/V and 3He diffusivity D showed
the expected correlation, with S/V decreasing and D
increasing as emphysema progressed [58]. Similar
measurements on explanted human emphysematous lungs
have been made but not yet published [60].
Our group has also performed 3He diffusion imaging of
live mice [61]. Techniques for delivering 3He with each
breath are used, to obtain adequate S/N. These methods
were developed [62] by Hedlund and Johnson for rats and
showed enhanced 3He diffusion in elastase-treated rats [63].
Likewise, the results of Dugas et al. [61] on mice show
enhanced diffusivity in elastase-treated mice, but did not
show elevation of D in mice that had been exposed over
months to cigarette smoke. We note however, that no
verification of pulmonary emphysema by other techniques
was obtained for these smoking mice.
3. Fundamental measurement of 3He gas anisotropic
diffusion in human lung and evaluation of lungmicrostructure
Here, we present a mathematical model relating the
measurements of 3He gas diffusivity and lung microstructure
and report in vivo measurements of airway structure at the sub-
acinar level in human lung in healthy subjects and patients with
emphysema.
3.1. Theory of 3He gas anisotropic diffusion
In the branching tree model [64], the hierarchy of the
airway tree begins at the trachea and leads through bronchi
and bronchioles to the terminal bronchiole that feeds each
acinus—the major gas exchange unit in the lung. In humans
there are fourteen generations of airways prior to the
terminal bronchioles and another nine inside the acini [64].
Gas ventilation in the trachea, bronchi, bronchioles and
terminal bronchioles occurs by convection (bulk flow),
while diffusion is the primary ventilation mechanism beyond
the terminal bronchioles—in the acini, where about 93% of
gas resides [48]. According to Haefeli-Bleuer and Weibel
[65] essentially all airways in the acinus are decorated by
alveoli forming an alveolar sleeve. Thus the structures we
focus upon here are cylindrical airways covered by alveolar
sleeves, as schematically represented in Fig. 7. In humans,
intra-acinar airways branch dichotomously over about nine
generations, and the internal airway radius r falls from 250
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–83 71
to 135 mm, whereas the outer radius R (including the sleeve
of alveoli) remains constant at 350 mm [65].
The characteristic free diffusion length l0Zffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi2D0
pt
(0.56 mm for tZ1.8 ms, as applies here) is much larger
than the average alveolar radius of 0.15 mm; 3He atoms can
diffuse out of alveoli and across the airways in the 1.8 ms
time duration of the MR ADC measurement. During the
same time, most 3He atoms will remain inside the same
airway. Thus, in our model of gas diffusion in lung, we
consider airways rather than alveoli as the elementary
geometrical units. We approximate the airways as long
cylinders-either smooth (trachea, bronchi and broncheoli) or
covered with alveolar sleeves (respiratory broncheoli,
alveolar ducts and alveolar sacs). The alveolar walls as
well as the walls of alveolar ducts and other branches of the
airway tree serve as obstacles to the path of diffusing 3He
atoms and reduce the 3He diffusivity. Crucially, these
restrictions are substantially less along the airway axis than
perpendicular to it. Because gas motion along the axis of an
airway is less restricted than perpendicular to the axis,
diffusion in the lung is anisotropic. We show that this
anisotropy manifests itself in the MRI signal even though
each imaging voxel contains a very large number of
differently-oriented airways that cannot be resolved by
direct imaging. In particular, the anisotropy of diffusion
results in non-exponential MR signal decay as a function of
the weight b of the diffusion-sensitizing gradients [51] (see
just below Eq. (2)), allowing the diffusion rates along and
across the airways to be separately determined.
If the diffusion-sensitizing gradient is applied along or
perpendicular to the tube axis, the signal attenuation can be
written in the form of Eq. (1) with DZDL or DT, the
longitudinal or transverse ADC, respectively. For the more
general case of an airway with principal axis tilted from the
field gradient direction by angle q, the ADC can be presented as
ADCðqÞZDL cos2qCDT sin2q: (3)
With the spatial resolution of several millimeters currently
available with 3He MRI, each voxel contains hundreds of
airways with different orientations. For each individual airway
with orientation q, the signal attenuation is exponential with
respect to b, according to Eq. (1). Because of the ADC
dependence on orientation angle q in Eq. (3), after summing the
signals over all airways, the signal decay becomes non-mono-
exponential. This problem is mathematically similar to the
problem of water diffusion in randomly-oriented uniaxial
layers [50]. Because of the large number of acinar airways in
each imaging voxel, their orientation distribution function
g(q)Zsin q/2 can be taken as uniform. Therefore, the signal S
can be written as
S Z S0
ðp0
dqsin q
2expKbðDL cos2qCDT sin2qÞ� �
Z S0 expðKbDTÞp
4bDAN
� �1=2
F½ðbDANÞ1=2
� �(4)
where F(x) is the error function and we have introduced the
anisotropy of ADC
DANZDLKDT: (5)
Eq. (4) assumes that all airways are similar; i.e. all
airways have the same geometrical parameters and,
consequently, the same values of DT and DL. Ideally, the
expression for signal S should be further averaged with
respect to the different geometrical parameters of the
airways. To keep the number of parameters small in the
model, we assume that the diffusivities DT and DL already
represent averaged values.
Eq. (4) describes the non-mono-exponential dependence
of diffusion attenuated signal on the value of b. Hence,
the apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC, defined as ADCZKln(S/S0)/b, is a function of b. It can be easily demonstrated that
ADCZ�D Z
1
3DL C
2
3DT; bDL; bDT/1;
�D ZDT; bDL[1:
8><>: (6)
Apparently, in healthy lungs, DT/DL. The ADC at large b
values decreases to the value of DT because the signal from
airways oriented with a component along the gradient gives a
much smaller contribution as compared to the signal from
airways oriented perpendicular to the direction of the diffusion
sensitizing gradient.
3.2. Relationship between 3He gas adc and airway size
Because alveoli are open polygons with openings
nearly the same size as their diameters (Fig. 7), the gas
diffusion perpendicular to the acinar airway direction can
be approximated by the transverse diffusion in open
smooth tubes. The characteristic radius R here is the
major or larger radius of the airway. For the apparent
diffusion coefficient in the transverse direction with
respect to the tube (airway) axes and for the gradient
pulse waveform and timing of Fig. 2, we [51] found the
following theoretical expression:
DT Z16D0x
4Rh
2
wðh; 3Þ
Xj
bK41j
ðb21jK1ÞQ
b21j
2hx2R;h;3
!: (7)
Here we have introduced dimensionless parameters xR, h,
and 3 for the tube radius and gradient pulse timing (see
Fig. 2)
xR ZR
l0; hZ
D
d; 3Z
t
d; (8)
and the function w is defined as
wðh;3ÞZ hK1
3C3 1K2hCh3K
7
63C
8
1532
� �: (9)
Here, b1j is the jth (non-zero) root of the equation
J 01ðxÞZ0, where J 0
1 is the first derivative of the first order
Fig. 8. Transverse 3He diffusivity DT as a function of the airway external radius
R. Solid black line represents results obtained according to Eq. (7), and dots
represent computer Monte Carlo simulations. D0 is the 3He free diffusion
coefficient in air, and l0Z(2D0D)1/2 is the characteristic diffusion length. For
the free diffusion coefficient of infinitely diluted 3He in N2 or air, D0Z0.88 cm2/s, and the gradient waveform parameters DZdZ1.8 and tZ0.5 ms
described in Fig. 2, the characteristic free displacement is equal to l0Z0.56 mm.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–8372
Bessel function and the function Q(a, h, 3) is given by
Qða;h;3ÞZ 1K4
33K
2
a332½expðKa3ÞCa3K1�
C4
a332sin h2 a3
2
� ! expðKað1K3ÞÞK2 sin h2 að1K3Þ
2
� �expðKahÞ
� �;
(10)
where aZD0b21jd=R
2.
The limit of strongly restricted diffusion corresponds to the
case when the free atom root mean square displacement l0during the time D is much larger than R, i.e. xR/1. In this
limit, Q(a,h,3)z(1K43/3), the sums in Eq. (7) can be
calculated exactly, and the transverse ADC turns out to be
inversely proportional to D0 (motional narrowing)
DTyD0
7 1K433
�h2
12wðh;3Þx4Re R4
D0
; xR/1: (11)
In the case xR[1, the free atom displacement during the time
D is much smaller than R, and therefore only the atoms residing
in the cylindrical shell within the distance l0 from the
cylindrical surface ‘sense’ the boundaries. Hence, in this
limit, DT can be approximated as
DTyD0 1Kc1ðh;3Þ
xR
� �; (12)
where c1(h,3) is a numerical coefficient depending on the
waveform parameters. For the waveform parameters given in
Fig. 2, c1z0.65. Naturally, when xR/N, the value of DT
approaches that for the free-diffusion coefficient D0, as expected.
To derive the relationship in Eq. (7) between transverse
diffusivity and tube radius for given parameters of gradient
waveform, we used a theoretical approach that relies on the
assumption of a Gaussian distribution of the phases accumu-
lated by the precessing spins [66,67]. This approach is based on
the assumption of a random character of the phase accumulated
by the nuclei and, in fact, is identical to the random walk
approximation used in the pioneering papers [68,69]. Since,
then it has been applied to describing NMR signal behavior
under the constant or pulsed field gradient in some restricted
geometries (between two parallel barriers, in a cylinder and in a
sphere) in numerous papers (see, for example [50] and
references therein). To test the applicability of the Gaussian
approximation in our case, we have verified our theoretical
result against computer Monte-Carlo random walk simulations.
The ratio DT/D0 versus the reduced radius xR, calculated by
means of Eq. (7), is plotted in Fig. 8 along with the results of
computer simulations for the present gradient waveform
parameters listed in Fig. 2. This figure shows that for xR!0.5
(R!l0/2Z0.28 mm), DT, the transverse ADC, is very small—
less than 5% of the free diffusion coefficient D0. Qualitatively,
the very small value of DT results from a motional averaging
effect during each half (G) of the gradient pulse. In the
physiologically most relevant interval l0/2!R!2l0 (0.28 mm
!R!1.1 mm), the transverse diffusivity DT grows sharply to
about 65% of D0. With further increase in the tube radius R, the
value of DT increases very slowly and approaches the 3He free
diffusion coefficient D0 as 1/R. This means that for all airways
with radius less than 1.1 mm, 3He diffusivity is substantially
restricted (DT!0.65D0).
Themain feature restricting diffusion along the acinar airways
leading to a reduction in the value of DL, the longitudinal ADC,
compared to the free diffusion coefficient D0 is the presence of
alveolar sleeves as in Fig. 7. Longitudinal diffusion of particles
(3He atoms) located in the open area of the tube can be considered
as unrestricted, whereas diffusion of particles within the external
cylinder are significantly restricted due to the alveolar structure.
In fact, from the point of view of longitudinal diffusion, the
alveolar sleeves play the role of ‘traps’, effectively reducing the
longitudinal diffusion coefficient.
If the trapped atoms in the alveolar sleeves cannot exchange
(or can exchange only slowly) with the ‘free’ atoms in the
center of the tube, the average longitudinal diffusion DL
becomes equal to D0 (r/R)2, based on averaging over the
numbers of atoms in each region and their long-time limit
diffusivities (0 and D0). So, with exchange occurring, one has
D0ðr=RÞ2!DL!D0: (13)
Simulations of longitudinal diffusion confirm this expression. For
realistic dimensions, the simulations indicate that DL is about
mid-way between the limits expressed in Eq. (13).
3.3. Methods
Eq. (4) is the basis for separation of longitudinal and
transverse ADC values. Indeed, by collecting a series of MR
images with different b and fitting Eq. (4) to the data on a pixel-
D DL DT R
N1
P1
P2
Fig. 9. Single-slice maps of diffusivities for a normal subject (N1) and two
patients with severe emphysema (P1 and P2). From left to right the columns
display the orientationally-averaged diffusivity �D, the longitudinal ADC value
DL, the transverse ADC value DT, and the mean airway radius R. The color
scale on the right represents diffusivity coefficients in centimeter2/second and
airway radii in millimeter. Each color corresponds to 0.05 unit. Brown arrows
point to an area of emphysematous lung with minor airway destruction, pink
arrows to an area with moderate airway destruction, and green arrows to a lung
area with severe emphysema. The small high-diffusivity regions in N1 are the
two bronchi below their branching from the trachea.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–83 73
by-pixel basis, we can create maps of the values of the
transverse and anisotropic ADC, DT and DAN. The mean �D and
longitudinal DL are then obtained from Eqs. (6) and (5), and the
mean airway radius R is obtained from Eq. (7). We use an
imaging technique for 3He diffusion measurement with six
two-dimensional gradient echo sequences as in Fig. 2,
combined together so that each has its own identical small-
angle RF pulse, and its own identical slice selection, phase
encode, and read-out gradients. Data are collected in an
interleaved manner by collecting the same line in k-space for
all six images prior to stepping to the next line, ensuring
reduced sensitivity to motion artifacts. The standard central
reordering of phase encoding is used to reduce the possible
influence of signal decay during acquisition. All six sequences
except the first one include diffusion-sensitizing gradients with
increasing amplitudes, Gm, and consisting of one bipolar pulse
pair as in Fig. 2. The corresponding values of b are 0, 1.5, 3,
4.5, 6 and 7.5 s/cm2. The diffusion gradient is applied
perpendicular to the long axis of the body. For a typical
experiment, we use a slice thickness of 20 mm and an in-plane
resolution of 7!7 mm (225!450 mm field of view with 32!64 k-space samples). Each of the 32 lines in k-space uses an RF
excitation of about 78, allowing for repeated acquisition from
the same hyperpolarized spins. The gradient echo time in all
sequences is TEZ7.2 ms.
All images were acquired with a 1.5 T whole body Siemens
Magnetom Vision scanner. Homemade double-tuned RF
Helmholtz coils were used to transmit and receive the MRI
signal at the 1H and 3He resonance frequencies. Switching of the
operating frequency was performed without moving the subject,
allowing for better registry and comparison between 3He and 1H
scout images. After the RF coils were placed above and below the
chest, the subject was positioned supine in theMRmagnet. First,
scout images were obtained using conventional proton MRI.
These proton images were used to select the slices and
orientations for the 3He images, and for anatomic reference to
the 3He images. Then, the hyperpolarized 3He gas mixed with
nitrogen was delivered to the subject through a plastic ventilator
tubing connected to a mouthpiece. Imaging was performed
during breathhold at the end of full inhalation. Four slices were
obtained from each subject in less then 10 s, except for one
normal volunteer with only three slices because of inadequate
S/N. Diffusivity maps were obtained by fitting Eq. (4) to the
experimental data on a pixel-by-pixel basis using Bayesian
probability theorywith uninformative prior probabilities. Normal
volunteers and patients with severe emphysema and selected for
lung volume reduction surgery were studied.
3.4. Preliminary findings
In all of the subjects, both normal and emphysema patients,
gas diffusivity is anisotropic with the mean longitudinal ADC
being usually two to three times as large as the mean transverse
ADC. Representative maps of ADCs and the mean radii of
acinar airways are shown in Fig. 9 for one normal subject and
two patients with severe emphysema.
The following points are evident from our results. In healthy
subjects, the transverse diffusivity is strongly restricted, with
the mean value of DT almost eight times smaller than the 3He
free diffusion coefficient in air (D0Z0.88 cm2/s). The maps
defining DT and the resulting external radii R of the acinar
airways (including the alveolar sleeves as depicted in Fig. 7)
are highly homogeneous. The mean R is about 0.36–0.37 mm
in normal subjects. Given that our in vivo measurements were
made during full inhalation, this result is in remarkable
agreement with measurements on normal, excised lungs of
mean RZ0.35 mm [65]. In these subjects, the mean values of
DL, the longitudinal ADC, are less than half of the 3He free
diffusion coefficient. This is mainly the result of the restrictions
to diffusion imposed by the walls separating neighboring
alveoli along the same airway, as depicted in Fig. 7. In the
healthy subjects, both DT and DL decrease slightly from apices
to base; similar variation is present in some patients. As our
subjects are supine, gravity effects do not explain this variation.
In patients with severe emphysema, nearly all transverse
ADC maps show increased DT as compared to normal subjects,
but the diffusion is still restricted (DT!D0). The increase in DT
is consistent with an increase in the mean airway radius R. The
value of DL is also substantially elevated, becoming practically
unrestricted in some parts of the lungs (DLyD0). This effect is
consistent with the limits in Eq. (13) discussed above and with
an inflation of the airways which results in r approaching the
value of R (see inset of Fig. 7).
The relationship Eq. (7) depicted in Fig. 8 between
transverse ADC and airway radius R was derived under the
assumption that the diffusing 3He atoms cannot penetrate
through the alveolar walls. However, alveolar walls always
have pores. In normal lung the number of pores (known as
pores of Kohn) is very small and they are generally smaller
than 10 mm in diameter [70]; hence, their effect on DL and DT
and Eq. (7) is negligible. However, in emphysematous lung
many more pores (known as fenestrae) of variable sizes occur
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–8374
in alveolar walls [71]. The destruction of alveolar walls in
emphysema will contribute to the above-discussed increases in
the longitudinal and transverse ADC values. Thus, in the light
of tissue destruction in emphysema, Eq. (7) should be
considered as an approximation and the calculated values of
R should be regarded as an apparent radius of the airways.
The orientationally averaged ADC values �D from Eq. (6) are
similar to two-b-value ADC measurements for healthy subjects
and patients with severe emphysema [49,72,73]. However, the
previous work employed only two-b values and effectively
assumed exponential signal decay as a function of b through
the diffusion-sensitizing gradient strength. As is evident from
the present results and analysis, the ADC in lungs determined
from the two-b method depends on b-value and approaches the
true orientation-average value �D from below only in the limit
of vanishing b. That is, the true �D is the slope of the curve (ln of
signal as a function of b) at bZ0, while the two-b-value of
ADC is the slope taken between two points. The �D values
reported herein provide a more objective result because they do
not depend on the diffusion-sensitizing gradient strength.
The above analysis allows us to draw some general
conclusions about gas diffusivity in normal and emphysema-
tous lungs and to develop some notions about emphysema
progression. Our patient pool has been selected for lung
volume reduction surgery and therefore has very hetero-
geneous presentations of the disease. As a result, most of the
DT and DL maps in the patients are highly inhomogeneous,
showing regions of nearly normal as well as very abnormal
lung tissue. This provides an opportunity to follow the
dynamics of lung destruction through the progression of
emphysema by examining the variations within each patient, as
well as between patients. For example, the brown arrows in
Fig. 9 point to a quasi-normal area of lung in Patient 1. Here,
transverse diffusivity is only 30% increased as compared to a
normal lung (see similar area in the image above). This
corresponds to a mean airway external radius of RZ0.42 mm,
according to Eq. (7) and Fig. 8. However, the longitudinal
diffusivity in this area of the lung is increased by about 60%.
Pink arrows point to an area of lung that has an intermediate
level of emphysema (Patient 2)—here DT is increased by
almost 100% (corresponding to RZ0.52 mm) while DL is
elevated by about 80%, nearly equal to the unrestricted value.
Up to this stage we can envision that emphysema progresses by
expansion of airways without substantial destruction of
alveolar walls; this picture is entirely consistent with recent
findings [74]. Green arrows point to a highly emphysematous
lung region in Patient 2 where the transverse ADC value is
0.62 cm2/s—more than four times as large as in normal lung
while the longitudinal ADC is only 90% elevated. This
indicates that according to Eq. (7) and Fig. 8 the mean external
airway radius has become larger than 1 mm. The large increase
in apparent radius R and the concomitant decrease in
anisotropy (DL/DT) are consistent with substantial tissue
destruction in this region. These data indicate that the value
of DL is the more sensitive parameter for identifying early
stages of emphysema, while DT is the more sensitive parameter
for identifying lung tissue destruction as emphysema pro-
gresses (because DL cannot increase beyond D0).
In summary, in this section we have described a further
refinement to the technique of 3He diffusion MRI that
incorporates a model for the lung airway architecture and
allows the measurement of ADC anisotropy. Analysis of the
non-exponential signal decay on a pixel-by-pixel basis yields
separate values for the ADC along and across the acinar
airways, despite the fact that individual airways are too small to
be resolved directly. A mathematical model links the
transverse ADC and the mean airway radius R. Our in vivo
measurements of R in normal lungs are in excellent agreement
with previous ex vivo results. The results demonstrate
substantial differences between healthy and emphysematous
lung at the acinar level and may provide new insights into
emphysema progression.
4. Magnetization tagging and long-range diffusivity of 3He
The methods of Sections 2 and 3 follow the diffusive decay
of transverse spin magnetization over times of a few
milliseconds, corresponding to diffusion distances of a few
tenths of a millimeter. While these methods are quite
successful, the diffusion times are limited by T�2 , making it
impossible to probe the lung structure at longer distances with
transverse magnetization. An important reason to study
diffusion at longer length scales is to understand the
interconnections of the airways in health and disease. In
particular, collateral ventilation pathways (direct connections
between generationally distant parts of the lung tree) can best
be assessed by long-distance diffusion measurements.
There are two strategies for studying diffusion across longer
distances: (1) reduce the external field Bo to a point where T�2 is
much longer, since the decay time of transverse magnetization,
T�2 , is predicted to be inversely proportional to Bo (or even to
B20 in the motional averaging regime), or (2) tag the
longitudinal magnetization, which decays with a relatively
long time constant T1 (approximately 25 s for 3He in healthy
lungs in vivo). The problems associated with low-field imaging
were discussed in Section 1; preliminary images have been of
more modest signal-to-noise than expected [41]. Here, we
focus on tagging the longitudinal magnetization of 3He as a
method for measuring long-range diffusivity. Because of the
bifurcating nature of airways in lung (Fig. 10), the measured
diffusivity is dependent on the length-scale of the measurement
and thus on the time-scale. The long-range diffusivity may be
altered differently with different types of lung-tissue destruc-
tion and is a significantly different measure of lung structure [8]
than the short-range diffusivity [49,75]. The ADC measured
over times of seconds and distances of centimeters is denoted
Dsec to distinguish it from the ADC over milliseconds and
fractions of a millimeter, Dmsec, discussed in the two sections
above. We emphasize that the different time and distance scales
make these ADC values different, not the use of transverse
versus longitudinal spin magnetization. Further, for Dmsec
measurements, the gradient produces modulation of the
magnetization with a (minimum) wavelength smaller than the
Fig. 10. Pictoral representation of lung, showing the approximate 24 levels of
bifurcating airways and illustrating the conducting and diffusive (respiratory)
zones for gas transport. The diffusive zone contains about 93% of the gas
volume.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–83 75
linear dimension of a voxel, while for striping measurements of
Dsec the wavelength is 6–12 times the voxel dimension in the
read-out direction.
4.1. Lung structure
Healthy lungs are composed of approximately 24 levels of
bifurcating airways (Fig. 10); these are singly connected,
meaning that only one path along the airways exists between
any two points in the lung [48]. Some collateral, bypass
channels exist in human lungs via the pores of Kohn and
channels of Lambert, but these pathways have high resistance
and are not considered to be important in normal respiration
[76,77]. The conducting airways (approximately the first 15
levels) are essential but only represent about 7% of the total gas
volume. The last 9–10 levels are short in length and comprise a
region of diffusive transport where oxygen and carbon dioxide
exchange with blood through the walls of the alveoli; these
regions are the acini [48]. (We note that the ‘front’ between
convective and diffusive transport can change slightly between
inspiration and expiration and is altered somewhat because of
motion of the adjacent, beating heart [78].) The mean linear
size of an acinar unit is about 7 mm, with individual acinar
airways having lengths of approximately 1 mm [65].
4.2. Diffusion at long distances in lung
The branching nature of airways in lung, in particular that
arbitrary points are singly connected by unique airway paths,
necessitates that atoms must travel from one acinar airway to
the next for diffusion distances greater than 1 mm; over
centimeter distances, the change in direction at each airway
branch results in a tortuous path. Diffusion between arbitrary
points one or more centimeters apart requires that atoms must
travel from one acinus to another, connecting via a common
conducting airway node at level 14 (or lower-numbered) in the
tree. Thus to travel between alveolar sacs at the 24th level in
different acini, atoms must travel up at least 10 levels of
branching airways and then back down [48]. The apparent
diffusion measured over such distances is thus much more
restricted and occurs over times of several seconds. We and
others have determined that this diffusion coefficient Dsec is
about 0.02 cm2/s for explanted healthy human lungs and
in vivo dog lungs [75,79,95].
In emphysematous lungs, tissue destruction is known to
create progressively more alternate (collateral) routes for gas
motion between arbitrary points [80]. Diffusion over centi-
meter distances thus can proceed through the airways and the
collateral paths in parallel, so that Dsec is increased by the
collateral paths. The existence of these collateral pathways is
the basis for a new idea for minimal surgery that relieves
dyspnea by relieving trapped gas in patients with severe
emphysema [81]. Characterization of the collateral pathways
by long-range gas diffusion measurements would potentially be
very useful in planning for such a procedure. Magnetization
tagging with hyperpolarized gas is the only currently available
method capable of imaging diffusive gas motion and collateral
pathways at these distances, and is due to the long relaxation
time constant T1.
4.3. Spatial modulation of longitudinal magnetization
Spatial modulation of the longitudinal spin magnetization
Mz was originally used to track cardiac or thoracic motion by
establishing a coordinate grid locked into the tissue [82,83].
The primary advantage of this type of imaging is that encoding
or labeling of position is in the longitudinal magnetization,
which is characterized by the longest relaxation time constant
in the spin system, T1. Magnetization tagging of gases uses the
same imaging techniques as those used for cardiac tagging, but
here the motion of tagged magnetization in lungs at breathhold
is diffusive. The random (diffusive) motion of the 3He gas
atoms results in attenuation of the spatial modulation, allowing
measurements of diffusion over times limited only by T1,
approximately 25 s in vivo in human lungs and many minutes
ex vivo where O2 is excluded [75,79].
Sinusoidal spatial modulation of the longitudinal magneti-
zation, as opposed to a more nearly square-wave modulation,
offers advantages in that attenuation of sinusoidal contrast can
be easily interpreted in terms of a single diffusion length and
because it can be easily prepared with two rf pulses separated
by a gradient pulse. The result of this preparation is
sinusoidally modulated magnetization with wavelength l
(Figs. 11 and 12). For a gradient pulse of amplitude G and
effective duration t, the value of l is given by lZ2p/gGt, with
g being the spin magnetogyric ratio. If the two rf pulses are
Fig. 11. Idealized cross-section of a tagged image at increasing waiting times t,
with t0!t1!t2. In (a), diffusion alone is represented, without influence of T1
processes or rf consumption of magnetization by imaging pulses. The spatial-
average magnetization is unchanged, but the extent of modulation is attenuated
by the diffusion. In (b) the influence of T1 and the rf imaging pulses is depicted,
with no diffusion. Here the shape of the cross-section is unchanged, because the
magnetization is everywhere reduced by the same factor.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–8376
each of flip-angle q with the same rf phase, the fraction of
longitudinal magnetization Mz remaining at position x after the
second rf pulse is obtained from Bloch’s equations:
Mz Z cos2qKsin2q cosðgGxtÞ: (14)
The case with two 45 rf pulses gives
Mz Z ½1KcosðkxÞ�=2 (15)
with khgGtZ2p/l. This delivers 100% modulation of the
magnetization while avoiding the ambiguity of sign reversal
that occurs with gradient echo (magnitude) imaging. After the
magnetization tagging pulses, the spatially modulated magne-
tization is homogenized by diffusion according to the diffusion
equation [84]
vMz=vt ZDsecV2Mz: (16)
Here Dsec represents the effective diffusivity of the gas and T1
relaxation has been ignored for simplicity;P2 is the Laplacian
operator, v2/vx2 Cv2/vy2 Cv2/vz2. The relevant solution to the
above equation is given by
Mzðx;tÞZACBðtÞcosðkxÞZACBð0ÞcosðkxÞeKRt; (17)
Fig. 12. Images of time-evolving, sinusoidally modulated magnetization in canine l
(Dsec); note the different scales for each. Each grayscale image advances 1.36 s. In
lavage to induce emphysema. The healthy lung (at left) has a Dsec of 0.015 cm2/s (12
less restriction, as apparent in both the diffusion map and the rapid disappearance
where the decay rate constant R is determined by
RZDseck2Z4p2Dsec=l
2. Thus, the long-range diffusivity
Dsec can be calculated from measurements of R, since l is
known. Both the decay rate R and resulting Dsec are
independent of the initial modulation depth B(0), so exact
calibration of the rf tagging pulses is not essential. The effect of
both T1 relaxation and the consumption of longitudinal
magnetization Mz by subsequent rf imaging pulses (used to
inspect the decaying modulated magnetization and ignored in
Eqs. (16) and (17)) is to drive Mz uniformly toward zero (recall
the equilibrium Mz is virtually zero compared to hyperpol-
arized values), independent of position x as in Fig. 11. We
define the fractional sinusoidal modulation FM(x), as B(t)/A
from Eq. (17); this ratio is unaffected by T1 and rf pulses,
allowing long-range diffusion to be measured without
corruption from these effects. This is valid provided that T1
and rf pulses are uniform over the length scale l. The rf field
amplitude B1 is a slowly-varying function of position in the rf
coil, so B1 inhomogeneity is not expected to distort the
decaying sinusoidal magnetization over the relevant scale of l
(2–3 cm in our measurements).
The details of the data analysis of the successive images
showing the decay of tagged magnetization as in Figs. 11 and
12 has been published [75]. Essentially, the relative stripe
amplitude FM is determined at each voxel using a Fourier
integral over a single wavelength. The values of FM are fitted
to exp(KRt) separately for each voxel.
4.4. Long-range diffusion in lungs
The first magnetization tagging measurements with hyper-
polarized 3He in lung were reported by Owers-Bradley, et al.
[79] The tagging was also used to image respiratory motion,
and a global, lung-average diffusion was measured from the
decay of tagged magnetization across the entire lungs, without
imaging [83]. Their method calculated Dsec from decay rates at
several different tagging wavelengths. They found RZACDk2
with a constant D (which we call Dsec) for values of l from 1 to
4.5 cm. The constant decay rate A accounts for T1 relaxation.
Their result of DsecZ0.02 cm2/s in a healthy human subject in
this range of wavelengths is one tenth of typical values of
restricted diffusivity measured over milliseconds (denoted
Dmsec here). This dramatic decrease in diffusivity over larger
distances is consistent with the idea that gas atoms must travel
from one acinus to another through the maze of airways via a
common node on the airway tree. We show below in several
ungs, with accompanying color diffusion maps at short- (Dmsec) and long-times
these animals one lung (at right in the images) has been treated with elastase
! smaller than Dmsec in the same lung), and the emphysematous lung has much
of the modulation in the grayscale images.
Fig. 13. Decay of sinusoidal modulation (grayscale) and resultant long-range
diffusion map (color) in a nominally healthy, excised donor lung. Even after
6 s, there is little attenuation of the modulation; Dsec is measured to be
0.017 cm2/s nearly uniformly.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–83 77
studies of healthy lung that Dsec is typically about a factor of 10
smaller than Dmsec. We note that an alternative method for
measuring long-range diffusion involves observing the non-
exponential decay of magnetization within a single slice that is
repeatedly imaged; one can extract the rate of diffusion of spin
magnetization from neighboring regions into the imaged slice
[85]. One could also monitor the ‘washout’ of a slice into
adjacent slices with zero magnetization or the modulation of
slice-to-slice contrast. The method described here appears to be
a more direct measurement of Dsec.
4.5. In vivo Imaging of Dsec in dogs with unilateral emphysema
Our group has acquired images of Dsec via magnetization
tagging in live dogs with elastase-induced emphysema in one
lung only [75,86]. This unilateral emphysema model allowed
simultaneous control experiments in the left lungs of each
animal. Restriction to diffusion of 3He gas was significant in
the control lungs, as expected, and the measured long-range
diffusivity was about 12!smaller than short-range diffusivity
in the same lungs (0.015 versus 0.19 cm2/s). Fig. 12
demonstrates an obviously faster decay of magnetization
tagging in the emphysematous lung over the control lung;
there were marked increases (300%) of Dsec in the emphyse-
matous lungs compared to control lungs. More modest
increases in Dmsec (160%) were observed in the same animals
(Fig. 12).
This increase in Dsec for canine, elastase-induced emphy-
sema is strikingly smaller than that observed in several human
patients with severe emphysema (Fig. 14 and Ref. [75]). We
have demonstrated that this canine model reflects diffuse
panacinar emphysema, similar to that often encountered in
patients with aK1 antitrypsin deficiency. Although this is
different than typical smokers’ emphysema, the canine images
show that our technique for measuring Dsec can be utilized
in vivo and reflects a significant increase in collateral pathways
in emphysema via an increase in long-range 3He diffusion over
control lungs.
4.6. Imaging Dsec in explanted human lungs with emphysema
Explanted lungs offer distinct advantages for 3He imaging
and functional lung research: they can be held at inspiration for
several minutes, and the lack of saline (with attendant rf loss)
provides for the use of high-sensitivity coils for multiple
measurements on one bolus of gas. We imaged Dsec in
explanted human lungs from transplant recipients with
advanced COPD and in healthy donor lungs that were rejected
for transplant due to recipient mismatch [95].
The lungs with advanced COPDwere removed at transplant,
fitted with a bronchial connection to laboratory tubing, sealed
of leaks, and purged of O2 (the paramagnetic effects of which
depolarize 3He) with N2. The donor lungs were prepared
similarly. With the lungs at approximately functional residual
capacity, the lungs were repeatedly ventilated with 300-mL
tidal volumes of hyperpolarized 3He to mix the gas for
diffusion imaging. After there was sufficient gas in all areas of
the lung, Dsec was measured by preparing sinusoidally
modulated magnetization and then repeatedly imaging with
FLASH.
Fig. 13 clearly demonstrates the small decay of modulation
in a normal donor (control) lung. A value of 0.017 cm2/s was
measured for Dsec nearly uniformly in the 20-mm, approxi-
mately sagittal slice; this value is a factor of ten smaller than
Dmsec measured in the same lung. In stark contrast, Fig. 14
shows similar images in an emphysematous lung. Decay of the
sinusoidal modulation is apparent already at the second image,
taken 0.33 s after the first. In particular the upper lobe (at left in
each image) shows marked decay, as reflected in the map of
Dsec (0.6 cm2/s in this region, an increase by a factor of 30 over
the control lung).
4.7. In vivo Imaging of Dsec in humans
Measurement of the diffusivity from inspection of magne-
tization-tagged images is significantly affected by bulk flow, so
complete breath hold during the entire experiment time is
essential. We note that proper breath hold for other diffusion
imaging modalities is also important, but small amounts of flow
will affect Dmsec much less than Dsec, because Dsec measures
displacements over such long times (see discussion in
Section 2). Since tagging decay must be measurable after the
approximately 10 s of breath hold, we have not increased
in vivo tagging wavelengths beyond 3 cm. Shown in Fig. 15 are
inspection images of tagged magnetization in a healthy
volunteer. In these images we see slow decay of the tagging
contrast and some heterogeneity—the apex decays more
quickly than the base. We suspect that this may be mixing
driven by cardiac motion.
In summary, measurements of the ADC over centimeter
length-scales (Dsec) is reduced in healthy lungs by a factor of
about 50 from the free diffusivity Do. This large restriction is
attributed to the tortuous network of airways. In some regions
of severely emphysematous lungs, Dsec values approaching Do
have been measured, demonstrating the large range of increase
possible for this measure of lung microstructure. The increase
in Dsec in emphysema is due to increases in collateral
Fig. 14. Decay of sinusoidal modulation (grayscale) and resultant long-range diffusion map (color) in an emphysematous, explanted human lung. The rate of
diffusion of 3He is very high compared to normal lungs, especially in the upper lobe (at left in the images). Each grayscale image advances by 0.33 s.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–8378
ventilation pathways, so Dsec may be useful in distinguishing
different phenotypes of emphysema.
5. Fluorine-19 ADC measurements
5.1. Rationale
This review is focused on the diffusion of hyperpolarized3He gas in lungs. Nevertheless, recent results on the diffusion
of perfluorinated gases in lungs are relevant. Imaging of these
inert gases, primarily C2F6, C3F8, and possibly SF6 and CF4,
offers advantages over 3He: laser-driven polarizing apparatus is
not involved, resulting in a simpler and less expensive
technique; such gases gain S/N by having as many as six
equivalent 19F spins per molecule and a short T1 to allow rapid
signal averaging; and the gases may be mixed with oxygen to
allow continuous breathing (as opposed to breath hold of a
single bolus). The major drawback is that the perfluorinated
gases offer much less image S/N in a given acquisition time
compared to hyperpolarized 3He. In addition, long-distance
diffusion measurements as described in Section 4 for 3He, are
impossible for gases with nuclei of short T1. It remains to be
seen whether the perfluorinated gases will enter into wide-
spread use.
Several groups have reported spin-density or ventilation
images from 19F MRI using SF6 [11,12]. This gas has an
exceptionally short T1 and T2 of about 1.8 ms at room
temperature and 1 atm pressure [87]. We note that the first
images of the air-spaces of lungs used CF4 in dogs, by
Lauterbur et al. [88]; CF4 has a similar short relaxation time as
SF6 [87].
However, diffusion measurements to determine the local
severity of emphysema in lungs impose further requirements.
First, the T2 must be sufficiently long to allow the diffusivity D
to be measured with the available gradient strengths. As the
Fig. 15. Tagging decay in a healthy volunteer, in vivo; each grayscale image progres
coefficient is consistent with ex vivo studies by us and in vivo studies in Nottingh
quickly than at the base of the lungs. This may be due to cardiogenic mixing at br
goal of all this work is clinical implementation, this means
gradients of no more than 40 mT/m, for today’s whole body
MRI instrument. Second, the diffusion must be measured using
a sufficiently long diffusion time, t, so that the diffusive
motions of the gas molecules are substantially restricted by the
lung microstructure. Diffusion measurements on gases of very
short T2 necessarily use short diffusion times t and will report a
value very close to the free diffusivity D0 of the gas (see
below). For both reasons, the gases C2F6 and C3F8 (with T1ZT2 of 10 and 20 ms, respectively) are more suitable for
measurements of diffusion in human lungs. We note recent
measurements of D in rat lungs using SF6 gas [89].
The reduced diffusivity, D(t)/D0, is sketched in Fig. 16 as a
function offfiffit
p(after scaling of this variable to dimensionless
units) [90]. The ratio of surface area to gas-phase volume of the
porous structure or lung, S/V, can be used to define the
reciprocal of the characteristic length or feature size. Thus, the
dimensionless variable along the horizontal axis,
xh ðS=VÞffiffiffiffiffiffiffiD0t
p, is approximately the ratio of the free (unrest-
ricted) root mean square displacement in time t to the feature
size, (S/V)K1. In healthy human lungs [74], S/V is approxi-
mately 200 cmK1, the reciprocal of 50 mm. For x/1,
essentially no gas molecules contact a restricting wall in time
t, so DZD0. For x[1 molecules make many collisions with
walls during the measurement duration t and D approaches D0/
a, where a is the tortuosity as defined in the standard theory of
porous structures. (An interesting issue is that lungs with their
bifurcating branches do not truly have a characteristic length,
so they do not strictly possess a unique value of tortuosity a, as
would a sponge for example.) For intermediate values of
diffusion time (that is, x less than or of order unity), a famous
approximation [91] exists between the diffusivity and t,
DðtÞ=D0y1Kð4=9ffiffiffip
pÞðS=VÞ
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiD0t
p: (18)
ses in time by 2.9 s. The rate of decay is low, and the extracted average diffusion
am [79]. Some heterogeneity is visually apparent; gas in the apex mixes more
eath hold.
Fig. 16. Universal plot of time-dependent diffusivity D(t) scaled by free
diffusivity D0 as a function offfiffit
p(scaled) in a typical porous structure; S/V is
the ratio of surface area to gas volume. At small times, only a fraction of gas
atoms collide with the walls, resulting in a linear decrease of D withffiffit
p. At
large times, the diffusivity is reduced by the tortuosity factor. For practical
diffusion times t, the gases C2F6 and C3F8 are in the small time region while3He is in the large time limit.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–83 79
This expression describes the linear portion of the graph in
Fig. 16. Aside from the numerical factors, this relationship has
a simple physical explanation [92]. For 3He, the very large D0
of 0.88 cm2/s (dilute in N2 or air) results in typical x values of
25, for typical t values of 1–5 ms as is common (see above);
this places 3He measurements well into the tortuosity limit and
well outside the realm of applicability of Eq. (18). For C2F6 or
C3F8 (D0Z0.035 or 0.022 cm2/s, respectively [90]), the x
values are approximately 3–4 (see Fig. 16). Thus, imaging
measurements of restricted diffusion using these heavy, large
gas molecules should allow the surface-to-volume ratio to be
determined on a voxel-by-voxel basis, provided D0 is known.
Measurement of the local S/V should be a particularly valuable
characterization of lung microstructure in emphysema; we
know of no competing non-invasive method for measuring S/V
in lungs with spatial resolution. We note that the approximate
relationship of Eq. (18) is model-free; thus the interpretation in
terms of S/V is comparatively unambiguous.
Fig. 17. Images of restricted diffusion of C3F8 in freshly excised healthy (H)
and emphysematous (E) human lungs. The diffusion in (H) is more restricted, as
indicated by the color bar in centimeter2/second at right. The small arc of signal
below lung (E) is from gas in the tubing connecting to the lung. Each image
shown was acquired in 6 min. The partitions shown are 32 mm thick with 5.5!
5.5 mm in-plane resolution.
5.2. Methods
The images and results presented here used 100%
concentration of perfluorinated gas in excised lungs, to avoid
regulatory issues. It is our opinion that explanted emphysema-
tous human lungs are superior models of the disease in live
humans, compared to animal models. A high Q solenoidal rf
coil oriented sideways in the magnet bore (1.5 T) was used.
Three-dimensional data acquisition results in much more
efficient (faster) signal averaging than sequential-slice two-
dimensional acquisition. Typically, voxels were 5.5!5.5!32 mm3. For C3F8, only the 6 equiv. perfluoromethyl spins
were excited. The two center 19F spins are chemically shifted
by 42 ppm, about 2380 Hz at 59.85 MHz, and were placed in a
null of the rf spectrum of the pulses [90].
5.3. Results
The excised lungs were exhausted of air and very uniformly
refilled with 100% C2F6 or C3F8 gas using a bell jar apparatus,
designed to function with the same pressure inside and outside
the lung. Thus, there should be essentially the same amount of
gas in each image voxel. Indeed, spin-echo images (formed
using an rf p-pulse) obtained without diffusion attenuation are
strikingly uniform in signal intensity [90]. However, gradient-
echo images show intensity variations, most notably as regions
of low intensity due to dephasing effects across the large voxels
employed. These artifacts become larger at longer gradient
echo times (typical values are 4–10 ms), as expected for
susceptibility/dephasing effects. However, as remarked below,
the use of spin echoes in human subjects will involve a
substantial increase in deposited rf energy (SAR).
Restricted diffusivity results for C3F8 are presented in
Fig. 17, comparing a normal donor lung to an explanted
severely emphysematous lung. Both panels show individual
partitions (three-dimensional equivalent of slices); outside the
chest cavity, lungs take on quite different shapes. Judging from
the color bar, the diffusion of C3F8 is distinctly smaller (more
restricted) in the healthy lung than in the emphysematous lung.
This result shows the potential of 19F MR to characterize
emphysematous lung changes.
The histogram of Fig. 18 displays the data from C2F6 on two
normal donor lungs (nominally healthy) and eight explanted
lungs with severe emphysema. The data from the two groups
are well resolved with relatively little overlap. The average
ADC is 0.017 cm2/s for the normal lungs and 0.032 cm2/s for
the emphysematous group. Analysis of the raw data indicates
that a significant component of the standard deviation (see
figure caption) is from measurement noise. The factor of nearly
two change in the mean diffusivity between healthy and
emphysematous lungs is promising.
Fig. 18. Histogram of C2F6 ADC in two healthy (H) and eight emphysematous
(E) excised lungs. The vertical scale is correct for (E) but has been adjusted for
the healthy lungs to make the peak heights comparable. The average ADC and
standard deviation are 0.017 (0.0037) for healthy and 0.032 (0.0094) for
emphysema, all in centimeter2/second.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–8380
5.4. Transition to human imaging
The primary issues for in vivo human imaging are S/N, rf
energy deposition in the chest (SAR), and safety of the gaseous
agent. This last question is outside the scope of this review, but
the perfluorinated gases are exceptionally inert, appear to have
no toxicity, and have only small anesthetic activity (e.g. C2F6 is
similar to argon and only twice as active as nitrogen [93]). We
note that C3F8 is currently used to inflate microspheres in the
ultrasound contrast agent Optison, which may ease the
approval process for use of C3F8 in lung imaging of human
subjects.
On a per-spin basis, the solenoidal rf coil used with the
excised lungs here is estimated from phantom measurements to
be approximately 13 dB (!20 in power units) more sensitive
than a simple Helmholtz pair in a live subject. Some of the loss
of sensitivity in vivo comes from the smaller filling factor,
some from the long-recognized inferior performance of
transverse rf coils, and a substantial portion from the rf losses
due to saline conductivity in the chest. Thus, the rf power
required for specific nutation angles in a given time is increased
by a factor of 20 and, by reciprocity, 20 times as much signal
averaging time is required to accumulate a specified final S/N.
The need to maintain the deposited rf power within safety
guidelines pushes the technique (i) away from spin echoes
towards gradient echoes and (ii) away from the gases such as
SF6 and CF4 with very short T1 and T2. Consider the spin echo
sequence with p/2 and p rf pulses of equal durations: the ppulse has twice the amplitude and four times the rf energy as
the p/2 pulse. Thus, a spin echo sequence deposits five times
the energy as a gradient echo sequence.
The (S/N)2 accumulated in a given averaging time is
proportional to the fraction of real time that the spin signal is
present. Approximately, each signal persists for time T�2 and
can be repeated every T1; thus (S/N)2 is proportional to T�
2 =T1.
Since each of the gases considered here has nearly equal values
of T2, T�2 , and T1, all should yield the same S/N in a given time,
for equal numbers of equivalent spins per molecule. There is no
advantage to the very fast T1 (and T2) of SF6 and CF4; in fact,
these gases would have to be used with very high pulse
repetition rates to compete with C2F6 and C3F8 because of their
short T2 values, leading to excessive rf power dissipation. As
noted earlier, the short T1 gases are also not suitable for
measuring restricted diffusion. We note that gases with even
longer T1ZT2 than C3F8 would suffer from T�2 becoming
smaller than T2, yielding less efficient accumulation of (S/N)2.
The present results demonstrate that the restricted diffusiv-
ity of C2F6 and C3F8 can distinguish healthy and emphysema-
tous lung tissue and may be able to provide a spatially resolved
measurement of the surface area to volume ratio, S/V [94]. This
method would not require hyperpolarization apparatus and
would be more readily adoptable at medical sites. Based on the
imaging times used here with the high sensitivity rf solenoid
coil and the expected factor of 20 increase in averaging time, it
appears that additional improvements in S/N will be needed for
this technique to be practical. The available avenues for
improvement include use of a higher static field strength than
the present 1.5 T and use of a superior rf coil such as a phased
array.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the input and assistance
of their many colleagues and collaborators. In particular, the
medical knowledge of Joel D. Cooper, Steven S. Lefrak, and
David S. Gierada was invaluable. Rick Jacob lead the effort on
the use of C2F6 and C3F8 gases and Yulin V. Chang performed
many of the 3He and 19F measurements. A. L. Sukstanskii is
responsible for the mathematics of the diffusion in randomly-
oriented cylinders. S.S. Gross performed the computer
simulations of restricted gas diffusion. The 3He work was
supported in part by an NIH grant to DAY, R01 HL70037; the19F effort was partly supported by the Gas Enabled Medical
Innovations fund. Finally, we thank the patients, lung
transplant recipients, and the families of lung donors for their
important contributions to the research.
References
[1] T.L. Petty, G.G. Weinmann, Building a national strategy for the
prevention and management of and research in chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop
summary, JAMA 277 (1997) 246–253.
[2] M.S. Albert, G.D. Cates, B. Driehuys, W. Happer, B. Saam, C.S. Springer
Jr., A. Wishnia, Biological magnetic resonance imaging using laser-
polarized 129Xe, Nature 370 (1994) 199–201.
[3] R.D. Black, H.D. Middleton, G.D. Cates, G.P. Cofer, B. Driehuys,
W. Happer, L.W. Hedlund, G.A. Johnson, M.D. Shattuck, J.C. Swartz, In
vivo He-3 MR images of guinea pig lungs, Radiology 199 (1996) 867–
870.
[4] J.R. MacFall, H.C. Charles, R.D. Black, H. Middleton, J.C. Swartz,
B. Saam, B. Driehuys, C. Erickson, W. Happer, G.D. Cates,
G.A. Johnson, C.E. Ravin, Human lung air spaces: potential for MR
imaging with hyperpolarized He-3, Radiology 200 (1996) 553–558.
[5] M. Ebert, T. Großmann, W. Heil, W.E. Otten, R. Surkau, M. Leduc,
P. Bachert, M.V. Knopp, L.R. Schad, M. Thelen, Nuclear magnetic
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–83 81
resonance imaging with hyperpolarised helium-3, Lancet 347 (1996)
1297–1299.
[6] X.J. Chen, H.E. Moller, M.S. Chawla, G.P. Cofer, B. Driehuys,
L.W. Hedlund, G.A. Johnson, Spatially resolved measurements of
hyperpolarized gas properties in the lung in vivo. Part I: diffusion
coefficient, Magn. Reson. Med. 42 (1999) 721–728.
[7] G.A. Johnson, G.P. Cofer, L.W. Hedlund, R.R. Maronpot, S.A. Suddarth,
Registered 1H and 3He magnetic resonance microscopy of the lung,
Magn. Reson. Med. 45 (2001) 365–370.
[8] J.B. West, Pulmonary Pathophysiology, fourth ed., Williams & Wilkins,
Baltimore, MA, 1992, pp. 1–62.
[9] J.P. Mugler, B. Driehuys, J.R. Brookeman, G.D. Cates, S.S. Berr,
R.G. Bryant, T.M. Daniel, E.E. de Lange, J.H. Downs, C.J. Erickson,
W. Happer, D.P. Hinton, N.F. Kassel, T. Maier, C.D. Phillips, B.T. Saam,
K.L. Sauer, M.E. Wagshul, MR imaging and spectroscopy using
hyperpolarized 129Xe gas: preliminary human results, Magn. Reson.
Med. 37 (1997) 809–815.
[10] K. Ruppert, J.F. Mata, J.R. Brookeman, K.D. Hagspiel, J.P. Mugler III,
Exploring lung function with hyperpolarized 129Xe nuclear magnetic
resonance, Magn. Reson. Med. 51 (2004) 676–687.
[11] D.O. Kuethe, A. Caprihan, E. Fukushima, R.A. Waggoner, Imaging lungs
using inert fluorinated gases, Magn. Reson. Med. 39 (1998) 85–88.
[12] W.G. Schreiber, B. Eberle, S. Laukemper-Ostendorf, K. Markstaller,
N. Weiler, A. Scholz, K. Burger, C.P. Heusel, M. Thelen, H.-U. Kauczor,
Dynamic 19F-MRI of pulmonary ventilation using sulfur hexafluoride
(SF6) gas, Magn. Reson. Med. 45 (2001) 605–613.
[13] H.E. Moller, X.J. Chen, B. Saam, K.D. Hagspiel, G.A. Johnson,
T.A. Altes, E.E. de Lange, H.-U. Kauczor, Magnetic resonance imaging
of the lungs using hyperpolarized noble gases, Magn. Reson. Med. 47
(2002) 1029–1051.
[14] J.C. Leawoods, D.A. Yablonskiy, B. Saam, D.S. Gierada, M.S. Conradi,
Hyperpolarized 3He gas MR imaging, Concepts Magn. Reson. 13 (2001)
277–293.
[15] F.D. Colegrove, L.D. Schearer, G.K. Walters, Polarization of 3He gas by
optical pumping, Phys. Rev. 132 (1963) 2561–2572.
[16] T.R. Gentile, R.D. McKeown, Spin-polarizing 3He nuclei with an arc-
lamp-pumped neodymium-doped lanthanum magnesium hexaluminate
laser, Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 456–467.
[17] T.G. Walker, W. Happer, Spin-exchange optical pumping of noble-gas
nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69 (1997) 629–642.
[18] J. Becker, M. Ebert, T. Grossmann, W. Heil, D. Hofmann, H. Humblot,
M. Leduc, E.W. Otten, D. Rohe, K. Siemensmeyer, R. Surkau, M. Steiner,
F. Tasset, N. Trautmann, Realization of a broad band neutron spin filter
with compressed, polarized 3He gas, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res.,
Sect. A 384 (1997) 444–450.
[19] J. Becker, W. Heil, B. Krug, M. Leduc, M. Meyerhoff, P.J. Nacher,
E.W. Otten, T. Prokscha, L.D. Schearer, R. Surkau, Study of mechanical
compression of spin-polarized 3He gas, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys.
Res., Sect. A 346 (1994) 45–51.
[20] T.R. Gentile, G.L. Jones, A.K. Thompson, R.R. Rizi, D.A. Roberts,
I.E. Dimitrov, R. Reddy, D.A. Lipson, W. Gefter, M.D. Schnall,
J.S. Leigh, Demonstration of a compact compressor for application of
metastability exchange optical pumping of 3He to human lung imaging,
Magn. Reson. Med. 43 (2000) 290–294.
[21] R.E. Jacob, S.W. Morgan, B. Saam, 3He spin exchange cells for magnetic
resonance imaging, J. Appl. Phys. 92 (2002) 1588–1597.
[22] E. Babcock, I. Nelson, S. Kadlecek, B. Driehuys, L.W. Anderson,
F.W. Hersman, T.G. Walker, Hybrid spin-exchange optical pumping of3He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 123003.
[23] B. Chann, I. Nelson, T.G. Walker, Frequency-narrowed external-cavity
diode-laser-array bar, Opt. Lett. 25 (2000) 1352–1354.
[24] B. Saam, W. Happer, H. Middleton, Nuclear relaxation of 3He in the
presence of O2, Phys. Rev. A 52 (1995) 862–865.
[25] L.D. Schearer, G.K. Walters, Nuclear spin-lattice relaxation in the
presence of magnetic-field gradients, Phys. Rev. 139 (1965) A1398–
A1402.
[26] A. Haase, J. Frahm, D. Matthaei, W. Hanicke, K.-D. Merboldt, FLASH
Imaging: rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses, J. Magn.
Reson. 67 (1986) 258–266.
[27] M. Kveder, I. Zapancic, G. Lahajnar, R. Blinc, D. Suput, D.C. Ailion,
K. Ganesan, C. Goodrich, Water proton NMR relaxation mechanisms in
lung tissue, Magn. Reson. Med. 7 (1988) 432–441.
[28] D.A. Yablonskiy, Quantitation of intrinsic magnetic susceptibility-related
effects in a tissue matrix. Phantom study, Magn. Reson. Med. 39 (1998)
417–428.
[29] X.J. Chen, H.E. Moller, M.S. Chawla, G.P. Cofer, B. Driehuys,
L.W. Hedlund, J.R. MacFall, G.A. Johnson, Spatially resolved
measurements of hyperpolarized gas properties in the lung in vivo part
II: T2*, Magn. Reson. Med. 42 (1999) 729–737.
[30] B. Saam, D.A. Yablonskiy, D.S. Gierada, M.S. Conradi, Rapid imaging of
hyperpolarized gas using EPI, Magn. Reson. Med. 42 (1999) 507–514.
[31] E.E. de Lange, J.P. Mugler III, J.R. Brookeman, J. Knight-Scott,
J.D. Truwit, C.D. Teates, T.M. Daniel, P.L. Bogorad, G.D. Cates, Lung
air spaces: MR imaging evaluation with hyperpolarized 3He gas,
Radiology 210 (1999) 851–857.
[32] M. Viallon, G.P. Cofer, S.A. Suddarth, H.E. Moller, X.J. Chen,
M.S. Chawla, L.W. Hedlund, Y. Cremillieux, G.A. Johnson, Functional
MR microscopy of the lung using hyperpolarized 3He, Magn. Reson.
Med. 41 (1999) 787–792.
[33] X.J. Chen, M.S. Chawla, L.W. Hedlund, H.E. Moller, J.R. MacFall,
G.A. Johnson, MR microscopy of lung airways with hyperpolarized 3He,
Magn. Reson. Med. 39 (1998) 79–84.
[34] P. Mansfield, Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes,
J. Phys. C 10 (1997) L55–L58.
[35] M. Viallon, Y. Berthezene, V. Callot, M. Bourgeois, H. Humblot,
A. Briguet, Y. Cremillieux, Dynamic imaging of hyperpolarized 3He
distribution in rat lungs using interleaved-spiral scans, NMR Biomed. 13
(2000) 207–213.
[36] M. Salerno, T.A. Altes, J.R. Brookeman, E.E. de Lange, J.P. Mugler III,
Dynamic spiral MRI of pulmonary gas flow using hyperpolarized 3He:
preliminary studies in healthy and diseased lungs, Magn. Reson. Med. 46
(2001) 667–677.
[37] W.A. Edelstein, G.H. Glover, C.J. Hardy, R.W. Redington, The intrinsic
signal-to-noise ratio in NMR imaging, Magn. Reson. Med. 3 (1986) 604–
618.
[38] M. Salerno, J.R. Brookeman, E.E. de Lange, J.P. Mugler III,
Hyperpolarized 3He lung imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 Tesla: a study of
susceptibility-induced effects, Magn. Reson. Med. 53 (2005) 212–216.
[39] E. Durand, G. Guillot, L. Durasse, G. Tastevin, P.J. Nacher, A. Vignaud,
D. Vattolo, J. Bittoun, CPMG measurements and ultrafast imaging in
human lungs with hyperpolarized helium-3 at low field (0.1 T), Magn.
Reson. Med. 47 (2002) 75–81.
[40] J. Hennig, A. Nauerth, H. Friedburg, RARE imaging: a fast imaging
method for clinical MR, Magn. Reson. Med. 3 (1986) 823–833.
[41] R.W. Mair, M.I. Hrovat, S. Patz, M.S. Rosen, I.C. Ruset, G.P. Topulos,
L.L. Tsai, J.P. Butler, F.W. Hersman, R.L. Walsworth, 3He lung imaging
in an open acces, very-low-field human magnetic resonance imaging
system, Magn. Reson. Med. 53 (2005) 745–749.
[42] D.A. Yablonskiy, A.L. Sukstanskii, J.J.H. Ackerman, Image artifacts in
very low magnetic field MRI: the role of concomitant gradients, J. Magn.
Reson. 174 (2005) 279–286.
[43] D.G. Norris, J.M.S. Hutchison, Concomitant magnetic field gradients and
their effects on imaging at low magnetic field strength, Magn. Reson.
Imaging 8 (1990) 33–34.
[44] A.J. Deninger, B. Eberle, M. Ebert, T. Großmann, W. Heil, H.U. Kauczor,
L. Lauer, K. Markstaller, E. Otten, J. Schmiedeskamp, W. Schreiber,
R. Surkau, M. Thelen, N. Weiler, Quantification of regional intrapul-
monary oxygen partial pressure evolution during apnea by 3He MRI,
J. Magn. Reson. 141 (1999) 207–216.
[45] R.R. Rizi, J.E. Baumgardner, M. Ishii, Z.Z. Spector, J.M. Edvinsson,
A. Jalali, J. Yu, M. Itkin, D.A. Lipson, W. Gefter, Determination of
regional VA/Q by hyperpolarized 3HeMRI, Magn. Reson. Med. 52 (2004)
65–72.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–8382
[46] J.B. West, P.D. Wagner, Ventilation-perfusion relationships in:
R.G. Crystal, J.B. West, E.R. Weibel, P.J. Barnes (Eds.), The Lung:
Scientific Foundations, vol. 2, second ed., Lippincott/Raven, Philadel-
phia, PA, 1997, pp. 1693–1709.
[47] International Workshop on Pulmonary Imaging, University of Pennsyl-
vania, Philadelphia.
[48] J.B. West, Respiratory Physiology—The Essentials, fifth ed., Williams &
Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1995.
[49] B. Saam, D.A. Yablonskiy, V.D. Kodibagkar, J.C. Leawoods,
D.S. Gierada, J.D. Cooper, S.L. Lefrak, M.S. Conradi, MR Imaging of
diffusion of He-3 gas in healthy and diseased lungs, Magn. Reson. Med.
44 (2000) 174–179.
[50] P.T. Callaghan, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy,
Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991.
[51] D.A. Yablonskiy, A.L. Sukstanskii, J.C. Leawoods, D.S. Gierada,
G.L. Bretthorst, S.S. Lefrak, J.D. Cooper, M.S. Conradi, Quantitative
in vivo assessment of lung microstructure at the alveolar level with
hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 (5)
(2002) 3111–3116.
[52] E.O. Stejskal, J.E. Tanner, Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in
the presence of a time-dependent field gradient, J. Chem. Phys. 42 (1965)
288–292.
[53] T. Tanoli, D.A. Yablonskiy, T. Bae, J.D. Cooper, J.C. Hogg, J.C. Woods,
M.S. Conradi, Correlation of CT and 3He MRI evidence of emphysema in
human lungs, in preparation.
[54] M. Salerno, J.R. Brookeman, J.P. Mugler III, Time-dependent hyperpol-
arized 3He diffusion MR imaging: initial experience in healthy and
emphysematous lungs, Proceedings of the International Society for
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Ninth Meeting, 2001, p. 950.
[55] A.E. Morbach, K.K. Gast, J. Schmiedeskamp, A. Dahmen, A. Herweling,
C.P. Heussel, H.-U. Kauczor, W.G. Schreiber, Diffusion-weighted MRI
of the lung with hyperpolarized helium-3: a study of reproducibility,
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 21 (2005) 765–774.
[56] P. Akeson, I. Casselbrant, As Presented at 2004 International Workshop
on Pulmonary Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
[57] J.P. Mugler III, J.R. Brookeman, J. Knight-Scott, T. Maier, E.E. de Lange,
P.L. Bogorad, Regional measurement of the 3He diffusion coefficient in
the human lung, Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, Sixth Meeting, 1998, p. 1906.
[58] J.C. Woods, D.A. Yablonskiy, C.K. Choong, J.C. Hogg, J.D. Cooper,
M.S. Conradi, Measuring the progression of emphysema in a canine
model with 3He diffusion MRI, Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 13
(2005) 47.
[59] T.S. Tanoli, J.C. Woods, K.T. Bae, M.S. Conradi, J.C. Hogg, J.D. Cooper,
D.A. Yablonskiy, Hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI of acinar airways in
canines with induced emphysema: comparison with computed tomogra-
phy, Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 13 (2005) 1804.
[60] J.C. Woods, C.K. Choong, D.A. Yablonskiy, K. Chino, J. Bentley, J.
Wong, J.A. Pierce, J.D. Cooper, P.T. Macklem, M.S. Conradi, J.C. Hogg,
Comparison of morphometric data and 3He diffusion MR in emphyse-
matous human lungs, submitted for publication.
[61] J.P. Dugas, J.R. Garbow, D.K. Kobayashi, M.S. Conradi, Hyperpolarized3He MRI of mouse lung, Magn. Reson. Med. 52 (2004) 1310–1317.
[62] L.W. Hedlund, G. Cofer, S. Owen, G.A. Johnson, MR-compatible
ventilator for small animals: computer controlled ventilation for proton
and noble gas imaging, Magn. Reson. Imaging 18 (2000) 753–759.
[63] X.J. Chen, L.W. Hedlund, H.E. Moeller, M.S. Chawla, R.R. Maronpot,
G.A. Johnson, Detection of emphysema in rat lungs using magnetic
resonance measurements of 3He diffusion, Proc. Natl Acad. Soc. 97
(2000) 11478–11481.
[64] E. Weibel, Design of airways and blood vessels considered as branching
trees, in: N.S. Cherniack (Ed.), The Lung: Scientific Foundations, Raven
Press, New York, 1991, pp. 711–720.
[65] B. Haefeli-Bleuer, E.R. Weibel, Morphometry of the human pulmonary
acinus, Anat. Rec. 220 (1988) 401–414.
[66] D.C. Douglass, D.W. McCall, Diffusion in paraffin hydrocarbons, J. Phys.
Chem. 62 (1958) 1102–1107.
[67] C.H. Neuman, Spin echo of spins diffusing in a bounded medium,
J. Chem. Phys. 60 (1973) 4508–4511.
[68] E.L. Hahn, Spin echoes, Phys. Rev. 80 (1950) 580–594.
[69] H.Y. Carr, E.M. Purcell, Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear
magnetic resonance experiments, Phys. Rev. 94 (1954) 630–638.
[70] A. Nagai, W.M. Thurlbeck, K. Konno, Responsiveness and variability of
airflow obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinico-
pathologic correlative studies, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 151 (1995)
635–639.
[71] A. Nagai, W.M. Thurlbeck, Scanning electron microscopic observations
of emphysema in humans. A descriptive study, Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 144
(1991) 901–908.
[72] M. Salerno, J.R. Brookeman, E.E. deLange, J. Knight-Scott, J.P.Mugler III,
Detection of regional microstructural changes of the lung in emphysema
using hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI, in: Eighth Conference of
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Denver, 2000.
[73] D.A. Yablonskiy, B. Saam, D.S. Gierada, S.S. Lefrak, J.D. Cooper, M.S.
Conradi, Diffusion lung imaging of hyperpolarized 3He in patients with
emphysema: changes in the structure of Alveoli, in: RSNA 84th Scientific
Assembly and Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 1999.
[74] H.O. Coxson, R.M. Rogers, K.P. Whittall, Y. D’Yachkova, P.D. Pare,
F.C. Sciurba, J.C. Hogg, A quantification of the lung surface area in
emphysema using computed tomography, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
159 (1999) 851–856.
[75] J.C. Woods, D.A. Yablonskiy, K. Chino, T.S.K. Tanoli, J.D. Cooper,
M.S. Conradi, Magnetization tagging decay to measure long-range 3He
diffusion in healthy and emphysematous canine lungs, Magn. Reson.
Med. 51 (2004) 1002–1008.
[76] J.C. Hogg, P.T. Macklem, W.M. Thurlbeck, The resistance of collateral
channels in excised human lungs, J. Clin. Invest. 48 (1969) 421–431.
[77] P.B. Terry, R.J. Traystman, H.H. Newball, G. Batra, H.A. Menkes,
Collateral ventilation in man, N. Engl. J. Med. 298 (1978) 10–15.
[78] L.A. Engel, P.T. Macklem, Gas mixing and distribution in the lung, Int.
Rev. Physiol. 14 (1977) 37–82.
[79] J.R.Owers-Bradley,A.Bennattayalah, S.Fichele, J.C.McGloin,R.Bowtell,
P.S. Morgan, Diffusion and tagging of hyperpolarized 3He in the lungs,
Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Honolulu, 2002, p. 2016.
[80] P.T. Macklem, Airway obstruction and collateral ventilation, Physiol.
Rev. 51 (1971) 368–436.
[81] H.F. Lausberg, K. Chino, A. Patterson, B.F. Meyers, P.D. Toeniskoetter,
J.D. Cooper, Bronchial fenestration improves expiratory flow in
emphysematous lungs, Ann. Thorac. Surg. 75 (2003) 393–398.
[82] L. Alex, L. Dougherty, MR imaging of motion with spatial modulation of
magnetization, Radiology 171 (1989) 841–845.
[83] J.R. Owers-Bradley, S. Fichele, A. Bennattayalah, C.J.S. McGloin,
R.W. Bowtell, P.S. Morgan, A.R. Moody, MR tagging of human lungs
using hyperpolarized 3He gas, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 17 (2003) 142–
146.
[84] H.C. Torrey, Phys. Rev. 104 (1956) 563.
[85] S. Fichele, M.N. Paley, N. Woodhouse, P.D. Griffiths, E.J. van Beek,
J.M. Wild, J. Magn. Reson. 174 (2005) 28–33.
[86] C.K. Choong, P.D. Toeniskoetter, J.D. Cooper, H.F. Lausberg, K.T. Bae,
J.A. Pierce, J.C. Hogg, Exp. Lung Res. 30 (2004) 319–332.
[87] J.A. Courtney, R.L. Amstrong, A nuclear spin relaxation study of the spin-
rotation interaction in spherical topmolecules,Can. J. Phys. 50 (1972) 1252–
1261.
[88] P.A. Rinck, S.B. Peterson, P.C. Lauterbur, NMR-imaging von fluorhalti-
gen substanzen, Fortschr. Rontgenstr. 140 (1984) 239–243.
[89] J.M. Perez-Sanchez, R.P. de Alejo, I. Rodriguez, M. Cortijo, G. Peces-
Barba, J. Ruiz-Cabello, In vivo diffusion weighted 19F MRI using SF6,
Magn. Reson. Med. 54 (2005) 460–463.
[90] R.E. Jacob, Y.V. Chang, C.K. Choong, A. Bierhals, D.Z. Hu, J. Zheng,
D.A. Yablonskiy, J.C. Woods, D.S. Gierada, M.S. Conradi, 19F MR
imaging of ventilation and diffusion in excised lungs, Magn. Reson. Med.
54 (2005) 577–585.
[91] P.P. Mitra, P.N. Sen, L.M. Schwartz, Short-time behavior of the diffusion
coefficient as a geometrical probe of porous media, Phys. Rev. B 47
(1993) 8565–8574.
M.S. Conradi et al. / Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48 (2006) 63–83 83
[92] T.M. de Swiet, P.N. Sen, Decay of nuclear magnetization by bounded
diffusion in constant field gradient, J. Chem. Phys. 100 (1994) 5597–5604.
[93] K.W. Miller, W.D.M. Paton, E.B. Smith, R.A. Smith, Physiochemical
approaches to the mode of action of general anesthetics, Anesthesiology 36
(1972) 339–351.
[94] M.S. Conradi, M.A. Bruns, D.A. Yablonskiy, A.N. Sukstanskii,
S.S. Gross, J.C. Leawoods, Feasibility of diffusion-NMR surface-to-
volume measurements tested by computer simulations, J. Magn. Reson.
169 (2004) 196–202.
[95] J.C. Woods, D.A. Yablonskiy, C.K. Choong, K. Chino, J.A. Pierce,
J.C. Hogg, J. Bentley, J.D. Cooper, M.S. Conradi, P.T. Macklem,
Long-range diffusion of hyperpolarized 3He in explanted normal and
emphysematous human lungs via magnetization tagging, J. Appl.
Physiol. 99 (2005) 1992–1997.