Husbands' Traditionality and Wives' Marital and Personal Well-being in Mexican American Families...
-
Upload
kellie-berry -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Husbands' Traditionality and Wives' Marital and Personal Well-being in Mexican American Families...
Husbands' Traditionality and Wives' Marital and Personal Well-being in Mexican American Families
Yuliana Rodriguez, Jill K. Walls, Heather M. Helms, & Monsy Bonilla
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
In this investigation, we examined the link between husbands’ traditionality and their wives’ marital and personal well-being in 125 Mexican American couples with young children. During 2- 3 hour home interviews with couples recruited via cultural insiders and snowball sampling methods, husbands and wives described themselves and their marriages, the extent to which they ascribed to gendered views about marriage and parenting, and their familiarity with and acceptance of various dimensions of Anglo and Latino culture. Analyses were conducted to: 1) examine the link between husbands’ traditionality and wives’ reports of marital quality and personal well-being, and 2) examine whether or not this link varied based on wives’ level of acculturation. Post-hoc analyses addressed how more vs. less acculturated wives differed on a number of background characteristics.
1) Is husbands’ traditionality related to wives’ marital quality and personal well-being?
2) Does the association between husbands’ traditionality and wives’ marital quality and individual well-being vary as a function of wives’ acculturation status?
3) How do more acculturated wives differ from less acculturated wives?
Variables M SD Range
Age
Wives 27.66 5.81 16 – 47
Husbands 29.91 6.04 18 – 48
First born 5.66 3.93 .08 – 13.64
Years in US
Wives 8.74 4.44 0 – 22
Husbands 11.20 5.26 2 – 27
Nuclear family size 4.02 .93 3 – 7
Total household size 4.79 1.38 3 – 10
Marital duration (years) 6.66 3.99 1 – 15
Education (years)
Wives 9.72 3.14 0 – 16
Husbands 9.06 3.17 1 – 18
Work hours (per week)
Wives 38.24 6.30 16 – 60
Husbands 43.55 8.37 20 – 80
Income (annual)
Wives $15,028 $6,564 $2,500 – $31,600
Husbands $24,886 $8,832 $8,000 – $69,000
Family $32,976 $12,826 $6,000 – $83,4000
Sample Characteristics (N = 125 Couples)
Construct Measure Author Scale & Reliability
Husbands’ Traditionality Gender Roles Attitude Scale Marital roles & childrearing subscales: 10 items
Hoffman & Kloska, 1995
5 point scale, higher scores indicate more traditional attitudes
α =.84 husbands
Wives’ Acculturation Status
Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans- II
Anglo orientation: 13 items
Mexican orientation: 17 items
Groups for analyses:
Less acculturated = Mexican
More acculturated = Mexican/bicultural & slightly Anglo
Cuellar, Arnold, & Maldonado, 1995
5 point scale, higher scores indicate more Mexican orientation (i.e., less acculturated)
Anglo orientation:
α = .87
Mexican orientation:
α = .81
Wives’ Marital Quality Marital Love and Conflict
Love subscale: 9 items
Conflict subscale: 5 items
Braiker & Kelley, 1979
9 point scale, higher scores indicate greater levels of love and conflict
Love: α = .86
Conflict: α = .59
Wives’ Personal Well-being Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
12 items (shortened version)
Radloff, 1977 4 point scale, higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms, α = .79
Abstract
Research Questions
Measures
Results & Conclusions
Bivariate Correlations Entire Sample
(N = 125)
Less Acculturated
Wivesa
(n = 105)
More Acculturated
Wivesa
(n = 20)
HUSBANDS’ TRADITIONALITY:
Wives’ Marital Love
Wives’ Depression
Wives’ Marital Conflict
-.22*
.16t
-.01
-.18t
.12
-.12
-.42t
.39t
.41t
Note: a Less Acculturated = Mexican status; More Acculturated = bicultural + slightly Anglo.
† p < .10. * p < .05.
Acknowledgements: This research was funded by a UNCG Regular Faculty Grant, the HES Grant Incentive Program, and an Agricultural Research Service Award (P.I. Dr. Heather Helms). Many thanks to participating couples, project manager Mary Julia Moore, and Darlene Pitaluga, Ashley Valezquez, and Diana Escobar for their assistance with data collection. Correspondance concerning this poster should be directed to Monsy Bonilla at [email protected].
Sample
Correlations Between Husband’s Traditionality and Wives’ Marital and Personal Well-Being
•Marital Status: 69.6% married, 30.4% cohabiting (but living as married)
•Child Gender: 58.4% male, 41.6% female
•Firstborns’ Generational Status: 7.2% 1st generation, 90.4% 2nd generation, 2.4% 3rd generation
•Ethnicity:•Wives: 96% Mexican, 1.6% Puerto Rican, 2.4% other Latin origin•Husbands: 93.6% Mexican, .8% Puerto Rican, 5.6% other Latin origin
•Parents’ Birth Place:•Wives: 93.6% Mexico, 4% US, 2.4% other Latin country•Husbands: 91.2% Mexico, 3.2% US, 5.6% other Latin country
•Employment Status: •Husbands: 98.4% employed, 1.6% non-employed•Wives: 52% employed, 48% non-employed
•Acculturation Status:•Wives: 84% Mexican oriented, 13.6% Mexican/bicultural, 2.4 % slightly Anglo oriented•Husbands: 68.8% Mexican oriented, 29.6% Mexican/bicultural, 1.6% slightly Anglo oriented
Overall, the more traditional husbands are, the less love wives report in their marital relationships. However, the consideration of wives’ acculturation status further qualifies this finding and suggests that the negative association between husbands’ traditionality and wives’ love is more pronounced for more vs. less acculturated wives.
A positive association exists between husbands’ traditionality and wives’ depression and conflict for more acculturated wives only suggesting that the more traditional their husbands are, the more depression and marital conflict these wives report.
A mismatch between husbands’ traditionality and wives’ acculturation status has negative implications for wives’ personal well-being and marital quality.
Variables
Less
Acculturated
(N = 105)
More
Acculturated
(N = 20)
Age 28.55 23.00
Education 9.35 11.63
Child’s generational status
1.92 2.08
Family size 4.10 3.60
Years in US 8.13 11.90
Marital duration
7.14 4.06
Wives’ Acculturation Group Comparisons
Note: All comparisons are significant at the p < .05 level