Human database relations (March 2004)

24
Understanding Media for Techies Human communications expressed using database relations Kiran Jonnalagadda <[email protected]> http://jace.seacrow.com/

description

I made this presentation to myself in March 2004 as a way to clarify my understanding of the then emerging field of social media. This may be incredibly obvious to you now in 2014, a full decade later.

Transcript of Human database relations (March 2004)

Page 1: Human database relations (March 2004)

Understanding Media for Techies

Human communications expressed using database relations

Kiran Jonnalagadda <[email protected]>http://jace.seacrow.com/

Page 2: Human database relations (March 2004)

One to One

All communications between individuals. Friends talking on the phone or over instant messenger, a

couple over a dinner table, a doctor and a patient, etc.

Page 3: Human database relations (March 2004)

One to Many

The broadcast model. Weblogs, magazines, television, newspapers; the traditional mass media.

Page 4: Human database relations (March 2004)

Many to One

The feedback model. Market research, customer service, product registration forms, letters to the editor,

comments on a weblog posting.

Page 5: Human database relations (March 2004)

Many to Many

Group discussions. IRC, mailing lists, in some sense, even LiveJournal. Not advertiser friendly except for

word-of-mouth. Not scalable, not long lived.

Page 6: Human database relations (March 2004)

Many to One to Many

Moderated discussion group. Left group (contributors) cannot scale or moderator is overloaded. Examples are

Slashdot (top level posts), Boing Boing.

Page 7: Human database relations (March 2004)

Delving Deeper

Is “many” really many?Should we distinguish between a few and many?

Page 8: Human database relations (March 2004)

Let’s look at this by media category...

Page 9: Human database relations (March 2004)

Newspapers, Magazines & TV

Page 10: Human database relations (March 2004)

The Consumer’s Perspective

A few contributors submit to the newspaper, magazine or TV channel, which presents their

work in a unified voice to several readers.

Page 11: Human database relations (March 2004)

Feedback Loop #1

A few readers write letters to the editor (print media only, not TV), which the editor selects from

and publishes for everyone to read.

Page 12: Human database relations (March 2004)

Feedback Loop #2

Readers/Viewers write directly to contributors, who may feature this feedback in their next

contribution.

Page 13: Human database relations (March 2004)

Feedback Loop #3

Readers/Viewers talk to an independent polling agency, which creates a report and shares it with

media and advertising organisations.

Page 14: Human database relations (March 2004)

Online News & Discussion Sites

(Like Slashdot or Kuro5hin)

Page 15: Human database relations (March 2004)

Top-level News Posting

The same as before: a few contributors, a moderator, several readers. But: lower costs, lower

revenues, more contributors, fewer consumers.

Page 16: Human database relations (March 2004)

Feedback Loop (Discussion)

This is where it gets interesting. Unlike traditional media, the Web is not a linear flow.

Read Unmoderated

Prefer Moderated

Page 17: Human database relations (March 2004)

What is a Group?

Is a “group” really a group, or just individuals bunched together for convenience? What happens

when they are treated as individuals?

Page 18: Human database relations (March 2004)

Individual Treatment

Traditional media crafts a common message that appears to be addressed to the individual.

Page 19: Human database relations (March 2004)

Individual Treatment

But on the Web, you really are having a conversation between individuals.

Page 20: Human database relations (March 2004)

Lots of Individuals

People rightfully worry about how public their conversations are, who is reading them.

Page 21: Human database relations (March 2004)

Advertisers Didn’t Understand

If you can’t bunch them into a group, how do you advertise to a mass audience?

Page 22: Human database relations (March 2004)

Advertising on the Web

On the Web, even ads have to be individualised. Advertisers have to accept that people talk to each other.

Page 23: Human database relations (March 2004)

To be Continued...

Page 24: Human database relations (March 2004)

The End