HOANG CONG TIN Hue University of Sciences VIETNAM
description
Transcript of HOANG CONG TIN Hue University of Sciences VIETNAM
HOANG CONG TINHue University of Sciences
VIETNAM
PRIMARY PRODUCTION IN THE SARGASSO SEA:An Integration of Time Series In-Situ Data and
Ocean Color Remote Sensing Observations
PP estimated using satellite is closely related with values measured in the field under overcast sky (Kahru et al., 2009).
INTRODUCTION
The theory to calculate the PP from ocean color satellite images or in-situ data was developed (Platt, 1986).
Understanding the methods to calculate PP from remote sensing and field data using Bermuda Atlantic Time Series Study (BATS) as a case study.
Primary productivity (PP) is an extremely important component in the Earth’s biogeochemical cycle and related to other factors (Field et al., 1998).
DATA AND METHODS
* SeaWiFS satellite images L3 data (2004)Available at http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/
1. Data and Materials
* SeaWiFS derived satellite time series Chl-a data at GiovanniAvailable at http://reason.gsfc.nasa.gov/Giovanni/
* Chl-a, Primary Production in-situ data from BATS Available at http://bats.bios.edu/
* NOAA Pathfinder ver 5.4km (24 pixels/degree) SSThttp://www.nodc.noaa.gov/SatelliteData/pathfinder4km
2. Methods
* Calculate and statistically analyze satellite data by using R, Matlab, MS. Excel software.
* Using SeaDAS software to analyze and process SeaWiFS images.
DATA AND METHODS
Nonlinear regression model (Gaussian) equation used to parameterize Chl-a profiles at BATS station
3. Study siteDATA AND METHODS
The map of Bermuda island and BATS stationSource: BIOS’ website
Located 75km Southeast of Bermuda at 31o50’N, 64o10W
Monthly sampling
CHL, SST, PAR CHL.a SST
PARPrimaryProduction
DATA AND METHODS
DATA AND METHODS
Collect in-situ data from BATS: Chl-a, PP
Process and analyze satellite imagery using
SeaDASCalculate parameters for
light transmission underwater from Chl-a
biomass profile (R software)
Estimate photosynthetic parameters (Platt et al.
1980)
Calculate PP in the water column
Collect satellite imagery (SeaWiFS): SST, Chl, PARThe flow chart for
calculate primary production from satellite image
Chlorophyll a concentration in Sargasso Sea
RESULTSMonthly-averaged maps of Chl-a distribution in the Sargasso Sea from SeaWiFS image
Bermuda
Satellite-derived Chl-a variation by year
The correlation between in-situ and satellite Chl-a
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG OCT SEP OCT DEC
Months
mgC
m-3
Sea Surface Temperature in Sargasso Sea
RESULTSMonthly-averaged maps of SST distribution in the Sargasso Sea from Pathfinder-5.0 image
Bermuda
PAR in the Sargasso Sea
RESULTSMonthly-averaged maps of PAR in the Sargasso Sea from SeaWiFS\NASA server
Bermuda
JAN 2004 FEB 2004 MAR 2004 APR 2004
MAY 2004 JUN2004 JUL 2004 AUG 2004
SEP 2004 OCT 2004 NOV 2004 DEC 2004
RESULTS Chl-a in 2004
JAN 2004 FEB 2004 MAR 2004 APR 2004
MAY 2004 JUN2004 JUL 2004 AUG 2004
SEP 2004 OCT 2004 NOV 2004 DEC 2004
RESULTS SST in 2004
Chl-
conc
entr
ation
(mgC
m-2
)
Time
Temporal variability in Chlorophyll-a derived from satellite at BATS
RESULTS
?* Data analyzing* Missing data
Nonlinear regression model (Gaussian) equation used as a standard profile and fitted to Chl-a BATS profiles .
RESULTSThe vertical of chlorophyll biomass can be represented by a shifted Gaussian curve for which the parameters vary widely with regions and seasons .
(Platt & Sathyendranath, 1988, 1989; Platt et al. 1991)
Calculate B0, h, σ, zm from Chl-a in-situ vertical profile
Daily Production using a shifted Gaussian biomass profile
JAN 2004
CHLOROPHYLL VERTICAL PROFILE AT BATS
FEB 2004 APR 2004 MAY 2004
JUN 2004 JUL 2004 SEP 2004
B0 = 0h = 60.57 σ = 57.97zm = 53.51
B0 = 0h = 66.23 σ = 123.89zm = 18.68
JUN 2004 - FITTED JUL 2004 - FITTED AUG 2004 - FITTED
B0 = 0.04h = 14.58σ = 16.38zm = 93.29
AUG 2004
SEP 2004
CHLOROPHYLL VERTICAL PROFILE AT BATS
OCT 2004 NOV 2004 DEC 2004
DEC 2004 - FITTED
depth Lat Lon Day alphaB P_mB z_m B_0 h sigma Cloud Yelsub140 31 -61 30 0.016 1.53 53.5 0 60.57 57.97 70 0.03140 31 -61 60 0.016 1.53 18.7 0 66.23 123.9 50 0.03140 31 -61 90 0.016 1.53 18.7 0 66.23 123.9 40 0.03140 31 -61 120 0.016 1.53 40.4 0 54.32 86.14 20 0.03140 31 -61 150 0.016 1.53 41.7 0 34.45 51.26 30 0.03140 31 -61 180 0.016 1.53 93.3 0.05 14.58 16.38 40 0.03140 31 -61 210 0.016 1.53 17.4 0.14 15.03 20.43 55 0.03140 31 -61 240 0.016 1.53 20 0.03 15.48 31.12 50 0.03140 31 -61 270 0.016 1.53 97.4 0.04 16.38 21.47 60 0.03140 31 -61 300 0.016 1.53 26.5 0.08 16.05 7.03 75 0.03140 31 -61 330 0.016 1.53 78.4 0.02 15.72 56.39 70 0.03140 31 -61 360 0.016 1.53 83 0 12.46 45.8 70 0.03
αB & PmB after L. M. Lorenzo et al. (2004) for model inputs
In si
tu d
ata
calc
ulat
edm
gC/m
^3/d
ay
Days
Calculated PP from satellite and in-situ dataRESULTS
Using Lorenzo parameters
RESULTS
Platt, Trevor; Sathyendranath, Shubha; et al, Nutrient Control of Phytoplankton Photosynthesis in the Western North Atlantic. Nature; Mar 19, 1999; 6366; Research Library, pg.229
Prim
ary
Prod
uctio
n(m
gC m
-2 d
-1)
Months
Calculated In-situ
The comparison of primary production between remote sensing data and ship-board data at BATS
αB, PmB from L. M. Lorenzo et al. (2004)
αB =0.016Pm
B = 1.53
Prim
ary
Prod
uctio
n(m
gC m
-2 d
-1) Calculated
In-situ
Months
αB, PmB from Platt and Sathyendranath (1992)
αB = 0.087-0.136Pm
B =2.96 - 5.25
Prim
ary P
rodu
ction
(mgC
m-2
d-1
)
Months
(oC)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
SSTPAR
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Chl_satChl_situ
Chl-a
conc
entr
ation
(m
gCm
-2)
Prim
ary p
rodu
ction
(mgC
m-2
d-1)
Months
Months1000
800
600
400
200
Phot
osyn
theti
callya
ctive
ra
diati
on a
nd SS
T (Em m-2 d-1)
(oC)
RESULTS Temporal variability in Chlorophyll-a derived from satellite and in-situ data at BATS
MAR 2004
MAR 2004
MAR 2004
Conclusions
• Surface chlorophyll-a in the Sargasso Sea shows distinct seasonal variation.
• Primary production in the Sargasso Sea exhibits seasonality: dominant feature is the Spring bloom.
• The model used to calculate PP needs to be refined and tested with additional field data.
+ Gained knowledge on ocean color remote sensing and primary production.
+ Used SeaDAS & R software to process satellite data
+ Applied methods to calculate Primary Production from remote sensing
* Analyzed satellite and in-situ data by R software * Running PP model using a vertical Chl-a profile
Lessons learned from the simultaneous analysis of field and satellite data
Acknowledgements
We would like to thanks Dr. Trevor Platt, Dr. Shubha Sathyendranath, Dr. George N. White, Dr. Heather , Dr. Li Zhai and Mr. Tom Jackson for their professional instructions.
Thank you
JAN 2004 NOV 2004
Prim
ary P
rodu
ction
(mgC
m-2
d-1
)
Months
(oC)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
SSTPAR
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Chl_satChl_situ
Chl-a
con
cent
ratio
n (m
gC m
-2)
Prim
ary
prod
uctio
n(m
gC m
-2d-
1)
Months
Months1000
800
600
400
200
Phot
osyn
theti
cally
acti
ve
radi
ation
and
SST
(Em m-2 d-1)
(oC)
RESULTS The temporal variability of Chlorophyll-a derived from satellite and in situ data in BATS
0.000
10.000
20.000
30.000
40.000
50.000
60.000
70.000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
SST
PAR
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Chl_sat
Chl_situ
0.000
10.000
20.000
30.000
40.000
50.000
60.000
70.000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
SST
PAR
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Chl_sat
Chl_situ
Prim
ary P
rodu
ction
(mgC
m-2
d-1
)
Months
Months
Chl-a
con
cent
ratio
n (m
gC m
-2)
(oC)
Prim
ary
prod
uctio
n(m
gC m
-2d-
1)
Months
Months
(oC)
Phot
osyn
theti
cally
acti
ve
radi
ation
and
SST
Satellite Primary Production Model