History of Teacher Evaluation
Transcript of History of Teacher Evaluation
A HISTORY LESSON
© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 2
Please Do Now
Click ahead when you’ve completed the appropriate section
of your Handout
A Brief History Lesson
4http://addparsley.com/blog/tag/teaching/
We’ll review three distinct phases of teacher evaluation in our nation’s history.
The first phase of teacher evaluation focused on Teacher traits or teacher dispositions.
One of the first pieces of literature on the topic, The Commonwealth Teacher-Training
Study, was published in 1929.
Phase 1: Teacher Traits 1929
7http://www.tower.com/commonwealth-teacher-training-study-w-w-charters-paperback/wapi/120956650
Authors Charters and Waples listed 83 different traits that teachers should
possess.
You may be surprised to learn that if you were a teacher in the 1930’s you’d be evaluated
by traits such as these…
Phase 1: Teacher Traits 1929
9
Cheerfulness:
http://www.tower.com/commonwealth-teacher-training-study-w-w-charters-paperback/wapi/120956650
Phase 1: Teacher Traits 1929
10
Cheerfulness:a) Does not look sullenb) Acts as if he were glad to be
livingc) Performs disagreeable tasks
pleasantly d) Looks as if he had a good timee) Cheers up the other fellowf) Smiles, even when things go
wrongg) Says “Good morning” to pupils
http://www.tower.com/commonwealth-teacher-training-study-w-w-charters-paperback/wapi/120956650
Phase 1: Teacher Traits 1929
11
Dignity:
Phase 1: Teacher Traits 1929
12
Dignity:a) Does not pretend to be going to
cry whenever boys misbehaveb) Does not apply rouge and
powder before pupilsc) Does not sit on top of desk and
swing feetd) Does not answer pupils back in
the same saucy way that they talk to him
e) Does not whine about things that do not suit him
However, by the mid-20th century there was a move to professionalize the teaching
profession.
Doctors and lawyers weren’t being evaluated by their personalities, but rather, by
standards and certification requirements.
Phase 2: Teacher Inputs Mid-20th Century
14http://www.publicadvocates.org/more-civil-rights, http://printable-db.net/search.php?id=28624
Just as lawyers had the bar exam, the teaching profession developed state certification tests.
The thought was that performing well on these tests, and later, participating in ongoing
professional development, that great teachers could be made and evaluated.
Phase 2: Teacher Inputs Mid-20th Century
16http://www.publicadvocates.org/more-civil-rights, http://printable-db.net/search.php?id=28624
The more PD sessions you attended, the better the teacher you were.
Phase 2: Teacher Inputs Mid-20th Century
18http://www.publicadvocates.org/more-civil-rights, http://printable-db.net/search.php?id=28624http://www.mountainside-medical.com/products/Littmann-Master-Classic-II-Stethoscope,-27%22-Black-Tubing.html
The problem with this scenario, though certainly better than being evaluated on your personality, was that this system on focused
on teacher inputs.
In addition, we’ve learned that these teacher tests are not predictive of the quality of teachers or their students’ outcomes.
.
That brings us to phase 3.
Phase 3: Student Outcomes 21st Century
21http://dc.gov/DCPS/In+the+Classroom/How+Students+Are+Supported
Teacher evaluation based on student outcomes.
At Relay, you’ve done the hard work of establishing your Pathway in your SGA modules, and by
building your teaching competencies in your Core and Content modules.
Phase 3: Student Outcomes 21st Century
23http://wordsmith.edublogs.org/http://dc.gov/DCPS/In+the+Classroom/How+Students+Are+Supported
Data Narrative =Your students’ outcomes
+The knowledge, skills, and
mindsets you developed to get them there
Data Narrative: Report of Your Research and Analysis
The Data Narrative is an opportunity for you to
share what you’ve learned and what you’ve
accomplished over the past two years. Make it
your own!