High Performance Produc on rough 3D Prin ng «3DP Pilot»...Agenda 14h00 -14h10 Welcome and...

High Performance Production through 3D Printing

« 3DP Pilot »

Dr. Vincent Duchêne (IDEA Consult - 3DP Pilot Network Manager)

5th Plenary Meeting – Brussels, 22 Septembre 2015

Agenda

14h00 - 14h10 Welcome and Introduction

14h10 – 15h20 Debriefing progress in cases for joint-demonstration

15h20 – 16h00 Debriefing on reactions from private sector

16h00 – 16h10 Preparation Brokerage Event early 2016

16h10 – 16h50 Access to finance: which funding opportunities?

16h10 – 16h30: H2020, regional funding, Transnational Investment Platform, ERA-Net

16h30 – 16h50: The Investment Plan for Europe (EC-DG Grow)

16h50 – 17h00 Varia

17h00 Closure of the meeting

14h – 14h10: Introduction

Se

pt

20

15

Ma

rch

20

15

Mapping

Definition &

Elaboration

Cases

Matching

Action

Set up

Collaboration

Jun

e2

01

5

De

c2

01

5

Bilateral contacts (Coord-reg leaders)

Broad

Specific,

operational

Multilateral contacts

Preparation Brokerage Event

Set-up partnerships

Organising the Pilot: Governance – Communication – Generic activities

Survey

Plenary meeting (3/6)

(working sessions, per case)

Se

pt

20

14

Bold: plenary network meeting

…

25

/02

20

16

Submit H2020

Structuring

the Efforts

Approaching companies (ind test)

Fine-tuning Cases

Set up new interregional funding mix

Turning political committment to structural support

From ‘pilot’ to SSP ?

Analysis mapping data

First matching

Plenary meeting (22/9)

(fine tune cases – industry check)

Roadmap - Timeline

Our objective � “to accelerate market

uptake of 3DP applications in the EU

through development of industry-led,

transregional demonstration platforms”

Which activities for joint-demonstration ?

02/10/2015 5

Generic support for e.g.:

• Knowledge sharing/best practices

• Matchmaking

• Training

• Certification

Shared technology platform for joint-

demonstration

(common to various applications,

products, domains, sectors)

Product-driven

demonstration

(specific applications,

products or processes)

Bu

sin

ess

-dri

ven

De

mo

nst

rati

on

• Mainly Private funding

• Competition, IPR (excl)

• Closed, bilateral

• Public-Private €

• Not open, but multilateral

• IPR agreements

• Mainly Public Funding

• Open

By connecting/upscaling:

�demonstrate potential

& validity

�disseminate

‘solutions’ and good

industrial practices

�support emergence of

‘standards’

14h10 – 15h20: Debriefing on the

progress in cases for joint-demonstration

Domain Joint-demo Case Leading region (co-leaders)

Automotive 1 “Hybrid materials for lightweigh, structural

components (Metal – CFRP)”

Emilia-Romagna (Lombardy, Aragon, Norte,

Saxony, baden-Wurttemberg)

Automotive 2 “Functionnally graded components (metal,

non-critical)”

Aragon (Emilia-Romagna, Norte, Baden-

Wurttemberg, Thuringia, Wallonia)

Machinery & Tooling “Structural parts with complex shapes” Wallonia (Lombardy, Aragon, Catalunya, Norte,

Orebrö Lan, Baden-Wurttemberg)

Creative Industries “Fashion - 3DPrinted Wearables” Catalunya (Lombardy, Flanders, South

Netherlands)

Textiles “Adding a dimension to 2D textiles” Lombardy (Flanders, South-Netherlands,

Catalonia, Nord-Pas-de-Calais)

3DP Smart Bike “3DPrinted bike & accessories” Flanders (Lombardy)

Healthcare “Customized Insoles & Ortheses” Emilia-Romagna

See also concept notes


Debriefing Case

Automotive 1 – Hybrid materials

5th Plenary Meeting22 September 2015, Brussels

Objectives, Scope and Division of Labour

1. Objectives & Scope:

– Develope 3D-Printing-based technology for hybrid (metal-composite),

lightweight components for automotive applications � weight reduction,

safety, flexibility & cost-efficiency

– How? � connecting joint-demo facilities between regions = manufacturing

chain, testing, validating, certification of technologies & processes common

to various applications / products (“shared, joint tech platform”)

– � strong potential to impact other value chains outside automotive

(machinery, construction etc)

2. Participating regions, actors and division of labour:

– Case leader: Emilia-Romagna

– Participating regions: Aragon, Norte, Saxony, B-W, Lombardy

– Others: Wales ?

– Division of labour: ER: Manufacture, Aragona:Design, Saxony and BW:test

02/10/2015 8

Timeline & Roadmap

1. April-Sept 2015:

– Mapping + matching: Identification synergies between regions, first concept note

– June: discussion 1st concept note + new regions / actors / inputs

– July-Sept: fine-tuning concept, contacting companies

2. Oct 2015 – early 2016 ...

– Writing a Revised concept note

– Concept tested with some companies

– Collecting all interests and define pilots

– Specify targeted technologies / activities

– Elaborate ‘the case’: • Which configuration ?

• Which activities?

• Which funding model?

• ...

– Prepare the Brokerage Event (25/2/2016)

02/10/2015 9

Contacts with Industrial Companies

1. Contacted companies1. Contacted companies– Lamborghini, some suppliers to Lamborghini, Ducati, FIAT, Automotive

cluster Aragon, Porsche and some suppliers, Daimler and some suppliers ... Plus some Machinery & Tooling companies in IT

– For three of them an abstract of interest has been subscribed (generic, no specific application was intentionally specified). Some Keywords: fatigue sensitive, durability, lightweight

2. Outcomes– From genuine interest (especially components manufacturers) (companies

ready to co-invest) to interest “only if” major players are in (companies at the window)

– Constraints: Funding must start from public sector; cofunding by companies is obviously acceptable for materials, moulds, tools.

– IPR must be clearly set; still no talks on Institutional setting.

– A joint-techn platform could be initially based on main existing facilities, by connecting demonstrators on different regions. Public funding could be used to (1) fill the gap for basic equipments and (2) people work

– Timeline: 3 years?

02/10/2015 10

Possible diffused Pilot Line

02/10/2015 11

MANUFACTURE

TEST 1

durability TEST 2

Crash

DESIGN FOR

MANUFACTURING

COMPANIES

Design

specification Raw materials,

moulds

Product

specification


Debriefing Case

Automotive 2- Metal products 3D Printing for Automotive components, tools and moulds



1. Objectives & Scope:1. Objectives & Scope:

AM metal for automotive components demonstration activities: freeform morphologies

and function graded materials (Titanium, Metal matrix composites, Aluminum, Inconel, Titanium Aluminide, Invar, among others).

Complex parts trying to follow the natural automotive flow from niche / motorsport vehicle parts to medium to high series production vehicles, e.g. exhaust manifold, suspension arms, steering knuckles.

And metallic inserts for carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastics, as this technology enables fast rate production of high performance components and for special tooling (e.g. enhanced process to produce injection molding inserts with conformal cooling for the optical plastics).

Direct Metal AM should be also considered Metal casted on AM molds, as well.

Business Relevance and ‘distance-to-market’:High performance parts, tools and moulds

– TRL from 5 to 8

– Potential: New design and competitive products, higher performance, complementary existing post-process competences, Faster penetration of the market, faster production, bridge production, new solutions, new design (thinking)

02/10/2015 13



02/10/2015 14

Source: Aitiip (Aragón)

Added value of joint-

demonstration:

Value chain is covered

on AM process,

Design, Post-process

and leading

applications in

automotive sector

with leading players



Value chain is covered on AM process, Design, Post-process and

leading applications in automotive sector with leading players

– Case leader: Aragón (Spain)

– Participating regions: Emilia-Romagna (Italy), Norte (Portugal)

– Others: Asturias (Spain), Lombardy (Italy), Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany),

Thuringia (Germany)

– Division of labour: all regions must provide industries and problem to solve

02/10/2015 15

ACTION COORDINATOR

1 Selection of demonstrators Aragón

2. Advanced products and tools design and characterization Norte

3. Process: Laser structure and machining Emilia Romagna

4. Process: manufacturing system and demonstrators Aragón

5. Testing Norte

How would the joint-demonstration activities look like ?

DESIGN• Application of new Design concepts with complex shapes, topology optimization, and light

weight structures to take advantage of one of the strongest points of AM, the freeform ability in

part design;

• Sustainable design and Environmental impact of Direct and Indirect Metal AM vs Conventional

Technologies in order to verify the environmental footprint of these new processes.

PRODUCTION AND TECHNOLOGICAL IMPLEMENTATION• Establish component properties and characteristics (strength, stiffness, density, accuracy etc.) as

functions of process parameters including laser specification, material characteristics and feed,

process path etc.

• Optimise laser surface structuring procedures for optimization of bonding.

• Application of innovative high-production molding techniques to high advanced components.

TESTING TECHNIQUES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS• Testing characterization of materials, light weight structures and parts, as manufactured and

heat treated. Performing of destructive tests on coupons or samples like tensile, static,

dynamic, fatigue, microstructure and x-ray, or NDT testing on parts e.g. dimensional and

geometrical analysis, Digital image correlation, 3D measurement with structured light and

photogrammetry.

02/10/2015 16

Timeline & Roadmap

1. April-Sept 2015:

– Mapping + matching: Identification synergies between regions, first

concept note

– June: discussion 1st concept note approved + new regions / actors /

inputs


2. Oct 2015 – early 2016 ...

– Concept tested with some companies: what do we learn ? Constraints ?

Options ? (see next slide)

– Collecting all interests and define pilots (see flyer attached)


– Elaborate ‘the case’: configuration, activities, funding model


02/10/2015 17


1. Which companies contacted

– OPEL-GM and SEAT suppliers and CAAR – ARAGON automotive cluster (Brembo, Alumalsa, Thermolympic, Mypa, Fersa) and others as Aernnova, Sispra, EMILIA ROMAGNA and NORTE companies (as Ferrari, Magneti Marelli, CACIA (Renault), Faurecia, Simoldes), ASTURIAS (as ARCELOR Mittal), BADEN-WUERTTEMBERG (as Daimler, Bosch) and THURINGIA (as Portec,...)

– OEMs, large industries and SME.

2. What do we learn?

– They would like to know exactly:• Real timeline

• Stimated máximum – minimum budget (included demo?, pilot?, investment?, subcontracting activities?, in kind effort?)

• Minimum amount of regions/participants

• Finance model: grant, bank loans,

• Confidencialty, IPR and exploitation issues

02/10/2015 18


Debriefing Case Acceleration platform for 3D Printed Complex Parts in Machinery & Tooling



– Accelerate the uptake by SMEs of 3DP for complex parts and

components.

– Focused on mature AM technologies implementation, close to industrial

expectations.

– Demonstration platform generating R&D requirements based on

industrial requests, demonstrate usefulness of sofa technologies.

– Partners provide expertise and equipment covering main components of

value chain, form design to post processing.

– Create critical mass by linking infrastructures, exchange best practices,

promote transdisciplinary collaboration.

– Three working models defined: top down model, challenge model,

trigger model.

– Participating regions: Wallonia, Lombardy, Aragon, Catalona, Norte

02/10/2015 20

Timeline & Roadmap

1. April-Sept 2015:


concept note



2. Oct 2015 – early 2016 ...

– Work an a communication strategy (flyers, …)

– Test the concept with companies, taking into account the potential

funding schemes.



– Choose between the 3 working models?


02/10/2015 21



– Anyshape, Addiparts, Walloon AM platform (Wallonia)

– BLM (Lombardy)

– ADIRA, CEI-Zipor (NORTE)


– Interest of end users

– What is the best suited funding scheme?

– Ownership of the results?

– Virtual platform with connection points in each region?

02/10/2015 22


Debriefing Case “Creative industries : Customized Consumer Goods in Fashion, Furniture, Lighting and Visual

Communication”



1. Objectives & Scope:1. Objectives & Scope:To address Customized consumer goods in the domains of:

– Fashion: Jewellery, Footwear, Accessories, Wearable, …,

– Furniture and lighting & Visual Communication.

by providing technological and know-how capabilities covering the whole value chain.

How ?

– � connecting joint-demo facilities between regions to share novel Design tools and skills for AM/3DP, all available materials, integration with conventional manufacturing techs and post-processes, testing equipment, product certification & education & training.

– � improving desing tools, materials, building capacities, manufacturing speed, costs, and size, automation in post-processes, access to testing and certification facilities, acces to consultancy services to develop new bussines on the basis of AM/3DP.

2. Participating regions, actors and division of labour:Case leader: Catalunya

Participating regions: Flanders, South Netherlands, Lombardia

Division of labour: Set up a network of Industrial Users and Solution Providers (All participant regions, coordinated by Catalunya).

02/10/2015 24

Timeline & Roadmap

1. April-Sept 2015:

– Mapping + matching: Identification synergies between regions, first concept note



2. Oct 2015 – early 2016 ...

– Concept tested with some companies.

– Collecting of the interests and exact definition of the chains to be implemented.

– Detailed specification of the technologies to be used and the activities to do (workplan).

– Elaborate ‘the case’: • Which configuration ?

• Which activities?

• Which funding model?

• ...


02/10/2015 25



– Catalan companies related to Creative Industries (see the list in the

Concept Note document)

– Hewlett Packard, Philips, Materialize.

– Some potential parters from Lombardia envisaged, also belonging to

Lighting Industries.

2. What did we learn?

– Wish list of these companies, related to challenges to implement

AM/3DP in their current production processes.

02/10/2015 26


Debriefing Case

Adding a dimension to 2D printed textiles




– Adoption of 3D-Printing technologies fo the textile sector � add new

aesthetic and functional-technical effects

– Development of a demonstration plant: a machine that can print (wheel

to wheel) in a continuous way on textile

– Focus on polymers with textile � Possibility to use it on a broad way of

fabrics � less competition � strong potential


– Case leader: Lombardy

– Participating regions: Flanders, South Netherlands, Nord Pas de Calais

– Others: Catalunia, Baden-Württemberg

02/10/2015 28

Timeline & Roadmap

1. April-Sept 2015:


concept note


2. Oct 2015 – early 2016 ...

– Concept tested with some companies: what do we learn ? Constraints ?

Options ?


– Identification of the most appropriate technology level

– Elaborate ‘the case’


02/10/2015 29



– Tessitura Taiana, Stamperia di Lipomo (textiles producers); Bottinelli

informatica (software); Reggiani (machinery); J-teck (ink); Armani,

Missoni, Versace (lead users in fashion); Brics’s (accessories); Colmar

(technical textile)


– Strong interest on a fashion textile focus � ready to go ahead, no

funding needed at the beginning

– Main constraints: long timeline, loosing the focus on the textile

02/10/2015 30


Debriefing Case 3DP Smart Bike




– Scope: the bike & everything in it’s near surrounding (�1m)

– Objective:

• combine 3D printing (in polymers or metals) with electronics (possibly “printed-on”)

• to make the bike and its biker smarter, safer, better aerodynamic, reduced vibration and

overall performing.

– How: use 3D printers, electronics printers with new designs of

components to generate new functionalities

– Goal: service to create new applications around “3DP smart bike”.

–


– Case leader: Flanders

– Participating regions: South Netherlands, Lombardy, Catalonia

– New interest: North Rhein Westfalen (NRW)

– Division of labour: to be discussed02/10/2015 32

Timeline & Roadmap

1. April-Sept 2015:


concept note


– July-Sept: attempt to fine-tuning concept

2. Oct 2015 – early 2016 ...

– Fine-tune concept to come to a selection of applications

– Interaction between industry and defenition of applications



– Bring industry together in specific pilots

and elaborate the case in a small group.

– Look for complementary partners/industry during the Brokerage Event

(25/2/2016)

02/10/2015 33



– No companies contacted yet!

Focus on:

– Bike companies, design companies, software producers, material

producers, 3DP producers, lead users

– Bike fleet managers, hire & share industry, user communities


– Be more specific before industry is ready to show interest or co-invest in a

pilot

– From RTD’s point of view a lot of different projects/pilots start up at the

same moment. Difficult to pay the same amount of attention to all of

them.

02/10/2015 34


Debriefing Case Healthcare

Cecilia Maini (Aster), Alberto Leardini (Rizzoli) – Bologna, Italy



1. Objectives & Scope:1. Objectives & Scope:– E.g. 3D-Printing for Healthcare, particularly for orthopaedics orthoses

(insoles, braces, splints, exoskeletons etc. ... closer to market) �personalisation, weight reduction, wearability-usability, safety, environment, flexibility & cost-efficiency;

– How ? � connecting hospitals, research centres, scientists, orthopaedics vendors, 3DP service providers, for: joint-demonstrations in various application disciplines in medicine, advanced design, product optimisation (materials, shapes, mechanics, etc.), new feature testing, efficacy validation, normative related issues, medical certification processes;

– � strong potential to impact other value chains outside orthopaedics (rehabilitation, physical therapy, sport & performance, aging, etc).

2. Participating regions, actors and division of labour:– Case leader: Emilia-Romagna (ASTER & Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli)

– Interested regions: Lombardia, South Netherlands, Aragon, Skane, Flanders ( ... others ?)

– Others (to be investigated): UK, Germany

– Division of labour: Rizzoli (Hospital & Research) to coordinate the various research and clinical activities

02/10/2015 36

Timeline & Roadmap

1. July-Oct 2015:1. July-Oct 2015:– July: mapping + matching: first concept note, preliminary identification of

synergies between regions

– Sept: discussion 1st concept note + new regions / actors / inputs

– Oct: fine-tuning of the concept, contacting further companies

2. Oct 2015 – early 2016 ...– Concept discussed with some companies, resulted in: a) necessary

knowledge / knowhow is dispersed, b) medical regulations are constraints, c) materials and 3D shapes / thickness etc. to be investigated further

– Collect all interested entities (clinical, scientific, technological, industrial), and define pilots


– Elaborate ‘the case’, among the following: • Configurations: insoles, HAFO, wrist braces;

• Activities: material/shape analyses, wearability, stiffness tests, motion/pressure analyses

• Funding: Emilia-Romagna, National Ministry, EC, private

• ...


02/10/2015 37



– Technology: EnergyGroup, WASP, 3DZ, Delcam ...

– Industry: Vibram, Corazza, Biotecnica, RTM


– Genuine interest to develop the discipline, to share knowledge, to merge competences and to recognise local excellences

– Worry on the new field because of the healthcare normatives (materials, allergies, insurances, etc.) and constraints because of funding

– Possible options to meet these interests: external direct funding (size tenths of thousands €; some Co-investment , no Foundations/Grants ... too slow)

– A ‘joint-techn platform’ would collect research centres with instrumental measurements, 3DP vendors with knowhow, orthoses manufacturers for the final utilisation

– Timeline: Nov ‘15 - Jan ‘16

02/10/2015 38

15h20 – 16h00: Debriefing on

reactions from private sector

1. Genuine industrial interest? 2. Readiness to co-invest? 3. Which format would take this cross-regional public-private joint-

demonstration?4. Which options / constraints ? 5. What about timing? 6. What does this mean in terms of governance / organisation?7. …

Imec business model

Source: imec

Imec business model

Source: imec

• Cited as good practice for managing strategic partnerships in high-tech sectors

• Program IP: clear rules for IP sharing among program partners*

• Extendable from single core (imec) to dual core

*More info, see: Leten, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Roijakkers, N., Clerix, A., Van Helleputte, J. (2013) IP Models to Orchestrate Innovation Ecosystems:

IMEC, a Public Research Institute in Nano-Electronics. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 55, NO. 4, pp. 51-64

16h00 – 16h10: Brokerage Event

• 25 Feb 2015 (tbc): Vanguard Brokerage Event

• Back-to-back to Vanguard Political Meeting (24/2/2015, tbc)

• Grant from DG Regio to the Vanguard regions (Pilots) to organise event and

its preparation & follow up (400.000€, 6 months from November on)

• Flexible event, i.e. meeting different needs of different pilots

• 3DP Pilot � 3 potential types of sessions:• « Advanced »: strong cases, including companies (and ideally also IPR agreements

and investment / funding mix)

• « Work-in-progress »: defining / refining the concept (amongst RTOs, cluster

organisations etc), looking for partners …

• « Explorative »: new cases

• Transversal sessions (IPR rules, funding mixes, certification & standards etc)

16h10 – 16h50: Access to Finance

Which funding mix(es) ?

• H2020• Aligning regional funding

• ERDF means for more cross regional collaboration• Opening vouchers’ systems

• Transregional Investment Platform• ‘MANUNET’ Era-Net Cofund (Basque

Country)• Investment plan for Europe: modalities,

instruments (EC, DG Grow)

H2020 calls (H2020 calls (H2020 calls (H2020 calls (draftdraftdraftdraft WPsWPsWPsWPs))))

• INNOSUP-3-2016: « ADMA Uptake for SMEs » (Services to accelerate the uptake of advances manufacturing by SMEs) � postponed to 2017 … �

• FoF 05-2016 (Jan2016): Support for the further development of Additive Manufacturing technologies in Europe, i.e.

– Review of tech development & deployment

– Identify gaps & opportunities for innovation & deployment

– Bottlenecks for transferability

– Community building activities

– Building skills capacity

– CSA, EU contribution €750K to €1mio (but only 1 project)

– Application as « Vanguard 3DP Pilot »?

AligningAligningAligningAligning regionalregionalregionalregional fundingfundingfundingfunding (1/2)(1/2)(1/2)(1/2)

1. ‘Opening’ part of regional funding towards each other1. ‘Opening’ part of regional funding towards each other– Using ”own resources” for interregional projects without extensive

bureaucracy, based on our own (and our partners) needs

– Each participating region uses its own resources (ERDF, ESF, national/regional funds…)

– Each projet in every region adds a budget line for interregional cooperation: traveling, expert costs etc.

– No transfer of funds (ERDF Regulation article 70)

– Good practice ? � FIN-Tampere: • part of ERDF-budget earmarked for investment in 3DP (incl demonstration)

(2,3 mio€)

• Part of which can be spent outside the region/country

• Travel costs, exchange of experts ...

• Replicable in other regions ?

� Who volunteers to further investigate this ?

AligningAligningAligningAligning regionalregionalregionalregional fundingfundingfundingfunding (1/2)(1/2)(1/2)(1/2)

2. Opening own, regional “Vouchers’ systems”

– IDEA: allowing the voucher to be spent outside the region

– ‘best value for money’-principle: each region/RTO takescare of own Cies/SMEs, but place where Demo-services are bought doesn’t matter

– Expected effects: increase mobility, rationalization & focused investments

– � very closed to EC ‘one-stop shop’ idea, in line with EC tool for SME access to KETs Infrastructure

– Wallonia strongly considers opening its vouchers’ system

– Others ? Who? (contact details …)

TransregionalTransregionalTransregionalTransregional Investment PlatformInvestment PlatformInvestment PlatformInvestment PlatformTransregionalTransregionalTransregionalTransregional Investment PlatformInvestment PlatformInvestment PlatformInvestment Platform

EFSI (Juncker Plan)

– Investment Platform for pooling of projects with

thematic focus

Specific Challenge:

Pooling resources to foster the competitiveness of Europe’s advanced manufacturing industry,

by the co-funding of manufacturing research projects.

Scope:

� Coordinate the research and innovation efforts of the participating Countries and Regions.

� Supporting in particular SMEs .

� With a special focus on the key areas of new production processes, adaptive manufacturing

systems and technologies for the factory of the future.

� Coordination with the relevant players at European level.

� International cooperation on R&I issues on manufacturing at global level.

Expected Impact:

� Creation of sustainable cooperation structures at regional, national and transnational level.

Deadline: 21 January 2016

Contribution from the EU between EUR 8 and 10 million

Cristina Ugarte (+34 94 420 94 88; [email protected])

NMBP-21-2016: ERA-NET on manufacturing technologies

supporting industry and particularly SMEs in the global competition

Investment Plan for Europe (EC)Investment Plan for Europe (EC)Investment Plan for Europe (EC)Investment Plan for Europe (EC)Investment Plan for Europe (EC)Investment Plan for Europe (EC)Investment Plan for Europe (EC)Investment Plan for Europe (EC)

16h50 – 17h00: Varia

1. Action & Scoping note: a progress 1. Action & Scoping note: a progress report

2. Next steps / to do’s:

High Performance Produc on rough 3D Prin ng «3DP Pilot»...Agenda 14h00 -14h10 Welcome and...

Documents

Transcript of High Performance Produc on rough 3D Prin ng «3DP Pilot»...Agenda 14h00 -14h10 Welcome and...