HFC network introduction and EPOC requirements from...

14
HFC network introduction and EPOC requirements from ZSCN EPOC project team, cable working committee of CRTA Dongqing Zhang - ZSCN Guangsheng Wu - Huawei LinZhi Wang - Broadcom Mr. Yao Yong Technical committee of CRTA 1 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC October 2012 Additional Interim Meeting

Transcript of HFC network introduction and EPOC requirements from...

HFC network introduction and

EPOC requirements from ZSCN

EPOC project team, cable working committee of CRTA

Dongqing Zhang - ZSCN

Guangsheng Wu - Huawei

LinZhi Wang - Broadcom

Mr. Yao Yong – Technical committee of CRTA

1 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

Network Overview

• CATV subscriber number – 0.66M

• Bi-directional covered subscriber number –

0.31M

• Bi-directional penetration ratio is improving.

• Basic topology – Fiber to the residential curb ,

with 1 amplifier and centralized distribution

coaxial cable network.

• Accumulated nearly 10,000 records during per

month test within 3years. User CNR is

maintained at more than 44.5dB.

2 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

EPoC requirements

• Why EPOC?

– Because FTTH is difficult. Zhongshan cable

network is with fiber-to-the residential curb.

– all IP and service development trends

• Spectrum for EPOC

– 5-65MHz and 900-1200MHz

– 5-65MHz spectrum requires to be co-

existence with HPAV EOC.

3 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

Channel test

• Tested at lab environment , with Node+1 topology and

all kinds of tap/splitter/ cable/amplifier

• Selected 2 sites at real network, and tested

noise/interference, etc.

• Mainly tested downstream/upstream Node+1/+0 cable

network characteristics, including signal level, C/N(SNR),

MER, loss - frequency response, group delay, and

calculated micro-reflections accordingly.

4 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

Lab test • Topology

H

L

CATV

HPAV

SP

16

SP

16 30m-9

50m-9

10m-5

S

T

B

• Connected 31 STBs, and separately tested parameters under different conditions, e.g. STB connect/disconnect, STB power on/off.

Test point

SP4

amplifier

SP2

5 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

Network sites

器件箱处需甲方提供220伏不间断电源。

7C-FB电缆线

放大器

二分配器

6C-FB电缆线

四分支器

终端匹配器

图例:

图例:

1/F

初审 制图

图号

图名 4幢楼内系统图

比例 设计 日期 10.7.01

项目

负责

审定

总体负责

校核

项目

2/F

3/F

4/F

5/F

6/F

7/F

8/F

9/F

10/F

11/F

12/F

13/F

14/F

15/F

16/F

9C-FB电缆线

17/F

18/F

豪逸御华庭有线电视工程

20分配

器件箱(55×35×18cm)

分支分配器箱(25×20×10cm)(建设方提供)

过线盒(建设方提供)

金属线槽(100×50mm)(建设方提供)

PVC管1×1Φ 20(建设方提供)

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

19/F

20/F

21/F

22/F

23/F

24/F

25/F

到各户

26/F

到各户

20分配

20分配

16分配

2010082-S4

10分配 到商铺

16分配

27/F

28/F

16分配

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

到各户

Test site1

Test site 2 – with HPAV EOC deployed

6 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

CNR test results

Under Node+1 scenario: almost all channels C/N≥43dB.

HPAV EOC signals exist at 5-67MHz spectrum.

All test sites are almost the same, without significant interferences exist.

No freq(MHz) mode power C/N(dB) MER(dB) BER

Z01 112.25 PAL-D -32 45

Z02 120.25 PAL-D -30 43

Z03 128.25 PAL-D -29.3 44.9

DS06 168.25 PAL-D -28.2 47.3

DS08 184.25 PAL-D -28 46.3

Z19 331 64QAM -27 43.3 42 0

Z37 482 64QAM -26 43.4 42 0

DS22 538 64QAM -26.7 42.3 40.7 0

DS23 554 64QAM -26.3 43 41 0

DS25 607.25 PAL-D -24 48.6

DS31 751.18 PAL-D -23.8 48.9

7 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

Below figure shows noise existed below 55MHz, but it was due to

poor connections on a connector of one splitter-16.

If all connectors are well connected, the false noise will disappear.

Poor connection may cause false

noise/interferences.

8 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

The noise floor for both downstream and upstream of N+0 is below

test equipment noise floor (R&S ETL noise floor is about -

165dBm/Hz) , and no significant interferences found.

9 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

Lab test with network analyzer -N+1/+0

N+1 S21 N+1 group delay

N+0 S parameters N+0 group delay 10 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

Real network test –N+0

Test site 1 N+0 S21 Test site 1 N+0 group delay

Test site 2 N+0 S parameters Test site 2 N+0 group delay 11 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

Micro-reflection analysis of test site1

Node+0

• Because all ports of the network are open, without

75ohm terminal match. There exist serious micro-

reflections especially above 1.0GHz frequency.

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0Micro reflections 1.0-1.2G

Time (uSec)

Loss(d

B)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0Micro reflections 1.2-1.4GHz

Time (uSec)

Loss(d

B)

12 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

Conclusion

• Under N+0 scenario:

– Given EPOC transmitter power is equal to DVB-C (104dB

μ/8MHz), and the transmission loss is approximately

40dB@860MHz, ≤45dB@1200MHz, and CNU receiver signal

level ≥69dBμ per 8MHz.

– The channel SNR can be higher than 56dB

• Under N+1 scenario: the test SNR is almost higher than

40dB.

• At Zhongshan cable network, with OFDM PHY, the

modulation order can reach 4096QAM

• There are almost no users at two test sites, all network

ports are open, micro-reflections is quite clear.

13 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting

Thanks!

14 IEEE P802.3bn> EPoC – October

2012 Additional Interim Meeting