HEPATIC SYNTHESIS AND URINARY ELIMINATION OF...
Transcript of HEPATIC SYNTHESIS AND URINARY ELIMINATION OF...
DMD #18127
1
HEPATIC SYNTHESIS AND URINARY ELIMINATION OF ACETAMINOPHEN
GLUCURONIDE ARE EXACERBATED IN BILE DUCT-LIGATED RATS
Silvina S.M. Villanueva, María L. Ruiz, Carolina I. Ghanem, Marcelo G. Luquita, Viviana A. Catania,
and Aldo D. Mottino.
Instituto de Fisiología Experimental (CONICET) - Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas
(UNR). Rosario. ARGENTINA (SSMV, MLR, MGL, VAC, ADM).
Instituto de Farmacología Experimental (CONICET) - Cátedra de Fisiopatología. Facultad de Farmacia y
Bioquímica (UBA). Buenos Aires. ARGENTINA (CIG).
DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as doi:10.1124/dmd.107.018127
Copyright 2007 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
2
Running title: Disposition of acetaminophen glucuronide in BDL rats.
Author for correspondence:
Aldo D. Mottino, PhD Instituto de Fisiología Experimental Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas Universidad Nacional de Rosario Suipacha 570. (S2002LRL)-Rosario ARGENTINA TE: 54-341-4305799 FAX: 54-341-4399473 E-mail: [email protected]
Text pages: 16
Tables: 0
Figures: 2
References: 40
Words in Abstract: 253
Words in Introduction: 626
Words in Results and Discussion: 1773
Abbreviations:
APAP - acetaminophen, APAP-GLU - acetaminophen-glucuronide, Bsep - bile salt export pump, BDL -
bile duct ligation, GST - glutathione-S-transferase, GSH – glutathione, Mrp2 and Mrp3 - multidrug
resistance-associated proteins 2 and 3, NAPQI - N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine, UGT - UDP-
glucuronosyltransferase.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
3
ABSTRACT
Renal and intestinal disposition of acetaminophen glucuronide (APAP-GLU), a common substrate for
multidrug resistance-associated proteins 2 and 3 (Mrp2, Mrp3), was assessed in bile duct ligated rats
(BDL) 7 days after surgery, using an in vivo perfused jejunum model with simultaneous urine collection.
Doses of 150 mg/Kg b.w. (i.v.) or 1 g/Kg b.w. (i.p.) of APAP were administered, and its glucuronide was
determined in bile (only Shams), urine and intestinal perfusate throughout a 150 min period. Intestinal
excretion of APAP-GLU was unchanged or decreased (-58%) by BDL for the 150 mg and 1 g/Kg b.w.
doses of APAP, respectively. In contrast, renal excretion was increased by 200% and 320%, respectively.
Western studies revealed decreased levels of apical Mrp2 in liver and jejunum but increased levels in
renal cortex from BDL animals, whereas Mrp3 was substantially increased in liver and not affected in
kidney or intestine. The global synthesis of APAP-GLU, determined as the sum of cumulative excretions,
was higher in BDL rats (+51 and +110%) for these same doses of APAP, as a consequence of a
significant increase in functional liver mass, with no changes in specific glucuronidating activity.
Expression of apical breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp), which also transports non-toxic metabolites
of APAP, was decreased by BDL in liver and renal cortex, suggesting a minor participation of this route.
We demonstrate a more efficient hepatic synthesis and basolateral excretion of APAP-GLU, followed by
its urinary elimination in BDL group, the latter two processes consistent with upregulation of liver Mrp3
and renal Mrp2.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
4
INTRODUCTION
Biliary elimination of drugs is mainly mediated by members of the ABC (ATP binding cassette) family of
transporters such as multidrug resistance protein 1 (Mdr1, Abcb1), multidrug resistance-associated
protein 2 (Mrp2, Abcc2) and breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp, Abcg2). Together with hepatic phase
I and phase II biotransformation reactions, they constitute a coordinated system to metabolize and excrete
into bile a wide variety of xenobiotics, including drugs of therapeutic application (Suzuki et al., 2003;
Catania et al., 2004; Aleksunes et al., 2005). Cholestasis, defined as decreased or ceased bile flow, is the
most frequent event related to liver disorders. Bile duct ligation (BDL) is an experimental model of
extrahepatic cholestasis widely used to resemble bile duct obstruction. Expression and function of major
canalicular transporters involved in bile flow formation, the bile salt export pump (Bsep) and Mrp2, are
impaired in BDL in rats (Trauner et al., 1997; Lee et al., 2000; Paulusma et al., 2000). We have
demonstrated recently that BDL rats, at 7 and 14 days post-surgery, present an impairment in the
glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-mediated conjugation of 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) in vivo,
thus leading to decreased synthesis of the model Mrp2 substrate, dinitrophenyl-S-glutathione (DNP-SG)
(Villanueva et al., 2006). It is not known, however, whether conjugation reactions mediated by another
relevant phase II biotransformation pathway, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), as well as subsequent
elimination of the corresponding derivatives via Mrp2 are similarly affected in hepatic vs. extrahepatic
tissues under BDL conditions.
Acetaminophen (APAP) is one of the analgesics most frequently used. At therapeutic doses, the
drug undergoes hepatic glucuronidation and to a lesser extent, sulphation (Thomas et al., 1993). Only a
small fraction of APAP results in the formation of the cytotoxic metabolite, N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone
imine (NAPQI), which reacts with cellular glutathione (GSH). Efficient glucuronic acid conjugation of
APAP is in consequence a crucial step in prevention of APAP toxicity. A previous report suggests that
biliary excretion of APAP glucuronide (APAP-GLU) is mediated by Mrp2 (Xiong et al., 2000).
Additionally, this metabolite can be excreted into blood through multidrug resistance-associated protein 3
(Mrp3, Abcc3), a basolateral Mrp family member, suggested to present a higher affinity for APAP-GLU
than Mrp2 (Xiong et al., 2000; Manautou et al., 2005). Mrp3 expression is low in human and rat liver
under normal conditions (König et al., 1999; Soroka et al., 2001). However, the expression of apical Mrp2
is down-regulated and, in contrast, that of sinusoidal Mrp3 is up-regulated in BDL rats (Trauner et al.,
1997; Paulusma et al., 2000; Donner et al., 2001; Soroka et al., 2001; Dietrich et al., 2004). More
importantly, biliary secretory function is severely affected in this model of obstructive cholestasis. Thus, a
vectorial change in the excretion of APAP-GLU from apical to basolateral transport is expected, causing
this metabolite to be excreted into blood instead of into bile. Interestingly, APAP liver toxicity was
attenuated in BDL rats, as judged by assessment of serum markers of liver damage and histology
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
5
(Acevedo et al., 1995), thought the mechanism remains unknown. In view of the impossibility of biliary
excretion of APAP and its metabolites in this model of cholestasis, extrahepatic tissues could compensate
for impaired liver function. Whether derivation of non-toxic metabolites of APAP or APAP itself to
extrahepatic tissues, additionally contributes to explain higher tolerance to APAP toxicity at the liver, was
not explored. We here evaluated liver, renal and intestinal formation and intestinal and urinary
elimination of APAP-GLU under conditions of BDL in rats, either in response to i.v. administration of a
subtoxic test dose (150 mg/Kg b.w) or after i.p. administration of a toxic dose (1 g/Kg b.w.) of APAP.
The results indicate that irrespective of the dose of APAP, BDL rats produced more APAP-GLU than
controls, with a significant elimination through urine and a minor contribution of the intestine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals. Leupeptin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pepstatin A, sucrose, APAP, APAP-GLU, UDP-
glucuronic acid (UDPGA), D-saccharic acid 1,4-lactone, Triton X-100, UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-
N-AG) and palmitoyl-lysophosphatidylcholine (PLPC) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St.
Louis, MO). All other chemicals and reagents were commercial products of analytical grade purity.
Animals and surgical procedures. Adult male Wistar rats weighing 300 to 350 g (National University of
Rosario, Argentina) were used. Animals had free access to food and water and received human care as
outlined in the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. BDL
was performed as described previously (Gartung et al., 1996) under ether anesthesia. Experiments were
performed 7 days after surgery. Controls underwent a sham operation that consisted of exposure, but no
ligation, of the common bile duct, and were studied 7 days later.
In vivo synthesis and excretion of APAP-GLU. Studies were performed using the in situ single-pass
intestinal perfusion technique (Gotoh et al., 2000) with simultaneous urine collection (Villanueva et al.,
2005). To evaluate the synthesis and disposition of APAP-GLU in response to administration with a
subtoxic dose of APAP, the bile duct (only in Shams), small intestine and urinary bladder were
cannulated under urethane anesthesia, as described (Villanueva et al., 2005). After a 30-min stabilization
period, a single dose of 150 mg/Kg b.w. of APAP was administered i.v. as described (Ghanem et al.,
2005). Bile, intestinal perfusate and urine were collected for 150 min at 10-, 15- and 30-min intervals,
respectively. Biliary, intestinal and urinary flows were determined gravimetrically. Additionally, a blood
sample was taken from the tail vein 5 min after administration of APAP. APAP-GLU content was
assessed in bile, intestinal perfusate, urine and serum by high-performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC) as described previously (Howie et al., 1997), with minor modifications (Ghanem et al., 2005).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
6
To evaluate the synthesis and disposition of APAP-GLU in response to administration with a
toxic dose of APAP, the animals were injected i.p. with 1 g/Kg b.w. of the drug. After 45 min, they were
anesthetized with urethane and the bile duct (only in Shams), small intestine and urinary bladder were
cannulated. One h after APAP was given; bile, intestinal perfusate and urine were collected for 150 min.
At the end of this period, the animals were sacrificed by exsanguination. APAP-GLU content was
assessed in all the samples by HPLC. Whereas the experiments on i.v. administration of the test dose of
APAP were performed to study in detail its glucuronidation and subsequent elimination of APAP-GLU
under non-saturating conditions (Ghanem et al., 2005), administration of the 1g/Kg dose, in the way of an
i.p. single injection, was used to study APAP-GLU synthesis and disposition under toxic conditions.
Because of the potential role of the kidney in elimination of APAP and its major metabolite
APAP-GLU in experimental obstructive cholestasis, it was also of interest to evaluate urinary excretion of
intact APAP as well as its tissue content and that of APAP-GLU in renal cortex. The tissue content was
evaluated at the end of the 150 min urinary collection period in rats receiving 150 mg/Kg b.w. of APAP.
Homogenate preparation and subsequent HPLC analysis were performed as described (Ruiz et al., 2006).
Western blotting studies. Because of the different localizations of Mrp2 and Bcrp with respect to Mrp3
(apical vs. basolateral), and to perform a comparative analysis of their expression in response to BDL, we
prepared homogenates from liver, jejunum and renal cortex, which were solubilized with Triton X-100 as
described (Cao et al., 2002). The final preparations were used immediately in western blot studies using a
monoclonal antibody to human MRP2 (M2 III-6, Alexis Biochemicals, Carlsbad, CA), a rabbit polyclonal
antibody to mouse Bcrp (M-70, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and a rabbit polyclonal
antibody to rat Mrp3 (Ogawa et al., 2000), respectively. Expression of UGT1A6, demonstrated to be a
major isoform involved in APAP glucuronidation (Kessler et al., 2002), was evaluated by western
blotting of liver, jejunum and renal cortex microsomal preparations (Catania et al., 1998) using a specific
rabbit polyclonal anti-rat antibody (Ikushiro et al., 1995). The immunoreactive bands were quantified
using the Gel-Pro Analyzer (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD) software.
UGT activity. Microsomal APAP glucuronidating activity was measured as described previously
(Kessler et al., 2002), except that PLPC (0.15 mg/mg protein) was used to fully activate the microsomal
suspension and D-saccharic acid 1,4-lactone (2 mM) was routinely included in the incubation media to
inhibit enzymatic hydrolysis of APAP-GLU. Hepatic UGT activity was alternatively assessed in the
presence of UDP-N-AG, the physiologic activator of UGTs, instead of PLPC. UDP-N-AG was
incorporated to the incubation mixtures at a 2 mM final concentration. The APAP-GLU formed was
detected by HPLC.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
7
Statistical Analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using the
Student’s t test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
BDL induced a significant increase in the liver weight to body weight ratio by 68% over Shams (0.052 ±
0.004 vs. 0.031 ± 0.003 for BDL and Sham rats, respectively, p < 0.05, N = 3) and in the mass of both
kidneys relative to body mass (+33%, 0.008 ± 0.001 vs. 0.006 ± 0.001, p < 0.05, N = 3). In contrast, the
relative mass of the fragment of small intestine perfused in vivo for transport studies was not affected by
BDL (0.013 ± 0.003 vs. 0.015 ± 0.002, N = 3). This portion of the small intestine (~50 cm long)
corresponds mainly to jejunum, where the highest expression and activity of Mrp2 were reported (Gotoh
et al., 2000; Mottino et al., 2000), whereas expression of Mrp3 and Bcrp were the lowest (Rost et al.,
2002; Tanaka et al., 2005). Excretion rate of APAP-GLU by these three organs is shown in Fig 1. Biliary
elimination of APAP-GLU after administration of a subtoxic, test dose, of APAP (150 mg/Kg b.w.) to
Sham rats showed its maximum value at 40 min, and thereafter decreased with time (Fig 1A). Although
statistically significant differences in intestinal excretion of APAP-GLU were observed in some periods
in response to BDL (Fig 1B), these differences had little impact on the cumulative measure (inset), which
did not differ between groups. In contrast, urinary excretion of APAP-GLU was increased significantly by
BDL from 60 min onwards (Fig 1C). Cumulative renal excretion of the glucuronide was increased by
200% in BDL rats respect to Shams (inset in Fig 1C). Total excretion of APAP-GLU was also calculated
for each organ and expressed as percentage of the dose of APAP. The data are shown in Fig 1D (left).
Under normal conditions, biliary and urinary excretion of APAP-GLU accounted for elimination of 13
and 9% of the administered APAP, respectively, with a minor contribution for the intestinal excretion (~
1%). The data also indicate that normal contribution of biliary excretion of APAP-GLU, absent in BDL
rats, was overrode by its renal excretion, which exhibited an increase of 264% with respect to Shams.
Intestinal elimination was not affected in BDL group. The total amount of APAP-GLU eliminated by
hepatic and extrahepatic tissues after administration of the test dose was significantly increased (+51%) in
BDL group, as seen in the same figure, clearly indicating exacerbated production of the glucuronide
derivative in this group when compared to Shams. We additionally evaluated serum APAP-GLU levels 5
min after administration with this same dose of APAP. The data indicate higher values for BDL rats
(1194 ± 247 µM) than for Shams (496 ± 64 µM), p < 0.05, N = 3, suggesting more efficient basolateral
secretion into blood. Urinary excretion of intact APAP was also increased in BDL rats (18.1 ± 0.3% of
the dose) when compared to Shams (11.9 ± 2.4% of the dose), p < 0.05, N = 3, likely reflecting
impossibility of excretion through bile. Renal tissue content of APAP-GLU by the end of the experiment
was higher in BDL (3.4 ± 0.2% of the dose) vs. Sham (2.3 ± 0.2% of the dose) rats, p < 0.01, N = 3, as it
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
8
is the content of intact APAP (1.3 ± 0.1% and 0.9 ± 0.1% of the dose for BDL and Sham rats,
respectively, p < 0.05, N = 3). These data are consistent with increased exposition of the kidney to APAP
and its glucuronide, as a consequence of a failure in their biliary elimination.
Cumulative elimination of APAP-GLU in response to administration of the 1 g/Kg b.w. dose of
APAP is shown in Fig 1D (right) as percentage of the total dose of APAP. Intestinal contribution in
Shams was minor, as already seen for the test dose, and was further decreased by BDL surgery (-55%). In
contrast, a substantial increase in APAP-GLU urinary excretion was observed in BDL rats when
compared to Shams (+397%), which again, overrode normal contribution of biliary elimination. Fig 1D
shows that the amount of APAP-GLU excreted by all tissues, was exacerbated in BDL rats when
compared to Shams (+110%), clearly indicating overproduction of the glucuronide derivative, as reported
above for the test dose.
APAP-GLU is a model substrate for both Mrp2 and Mrp3 (Xiong et al., 2000; Manautou et al.,
2005). Though Mrp2 has been considered a crucial step in liver elimination of endogenous and exogenous
glucuronides, more recently, Mrp3 was found to play also a significant role, as clearly demonstrated using
the Mrp3 null mice model (Belinsky et al., 2005; Manautou et al., 2005; Zelcer et al., 2006). To establish
a potential association between disposition of this metabolite and its plasma membrane transport in the
three tissues, we estimated the expression of Mrp2 and Mrp3 by western blotting. Fig 2A shows a
significant decrease in the content of hepatic and intestinal Mrp2 protein in BDL rats by 42% and 47%,
respectively, with respect to controls, whereas it was increased by 57% in renal cortex. These data on
tissue-dependent regulation of this transporter under conditions of obstructive cholestasis agree well with
previous reports (Trauner et al., 1997; Paulusma et al., 2000; Lee et al., 2001; Tanaka et al., 2002;
Dietrich et al., 2004; Villanueva et al., 2006). BDL treatment also resulted in a marked induction of
hepatic Mrp3 (+202%), in agreement with previous reports (Donner et al., 2001; Soroka et al., 2001). The
current western blot studies further demonstrate that expression of Mrp3 in jejunum and renal cortex was
not affected by BDL surgery (Fig 2A). Because of its high affinity for APAP-GLU, the remarkable
induction of hepatic Mrp3 could have explained an increase in blood accumulation of this metabolite
under BDL conditions, even in absence of increased glucuronidation capacity. Up-regulation of renal
Mrp2 may account for subsequent tubular secretion and thereby urinary elimination of this metabolite,
which was found to be significantly increased in response to administration of either a test or a toxic dose
of APAP. It should be considered, however, the possibility of a proportion of this metabolite to be
eliminated in urine by glomerular filtration. This needs further examination. In contrast to renal findings,
contribution of jejunum to elimination of APAP-GLU was of much less relevance. Moreover, decreased
expression of Mrp2 detected in intestine from BDL animals correlates well with impaired excretion of
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
9
APAP-GLU, as detected in vivo under saturating conditions resulting from administration with the 1 g/Kg
b.w. dose of APAP.
Bcrp is involved in apical transport of sulfate conjugate of several drugs, whereas glucuronides
are transported to a lesser extent (Suzuki et al., 2003; Zamek-Gliszczynski et al., 2005; Zamek-
Gliszczynski et al., 2006). Because some overlap exists in substrate specificity between Bcrp and Mrps, it
was also of interest to explore the effect of BDL on expression of Bcrp in homogenate from the different
tissues. The data in panel A from Fig 2 clearly show downregulation in liver and renal cortex. Intestinal
content was below the limits of detection with the current methodology. Decreased levels of Bcrp in
kidney strongly suggests a minor role for this pathway as a compensatory mechanism to eliminate the
non-toxic metabolites of APAP, APAP-GLU and APAP sulfate, under conditions of experimental
obstructive cholestasis.
Because of the findings on increased production of APAP-GLU in vivo, it was of interest to
explore the origin of overproduction of this metabolite. UGT activity towards APAP was first examined
in vitro in fully activated microsomes. The data (nmol/min/mg protein) indicate that neither liver (4.1 ±
0.4 vs. 4.9 ± 0.9, N = 3), nor jejunum (1.1 ± 0.3 vs. 1.4 ± 0.3, N = 3) or renal cortex (2.5 ± 0.2 vs. 2.1 ±
0.1, N = 3) exhibited any change in UGT activity in BDL when compared to Sham rats. These data
correlate well with the data on detection of a major UGT isoform involved in APAP conjugation by
western blotting. Fig 2B shows that only intestinal UGT1A6 was affected by BDL, with an increase of
27% over Shams. This likely had no consequences on APAP glucuronidating activity as reported above.
Because UGT activity detected in fully activated microsomes likely correlates with the number of
catalytic units or enzyme molecules (and thus with western blot studies) but not necessarily with the in
situ activity as conditioned by the lipid environment, we performed an additional assay using liver
microsomes in the presence of the physiologic activator UDP-N-AG, which does not produce membrane
perturbation (Zakim et al., 1977; Hauser et al., 1988). The study indicates that UGT activity did not differ
between BDL (1.5 ± 0.1 nmol/min/mg protein) and Sham (1.7 ± 0.8 nmol/min/mg protein) rats (N = 3).
Microsomal protein yield per liver mass unit was neither affected (36 ± 5 and 41 ± 6 mg per g of liver
weight in DBL vs. Sham rats, respectively). In consequence, UGT activity per liver mass unit is also
expected to be preserved in BDL rats. Because a net increase of the liver weight was observed in BDL vs.
Sham rats (16.5 ± 1.3 vs. 10.4 ± 0.3 g, p < 0.01, N = 3), it is likely that the higher amount of APAP-GLU
produced in cholestatic rats and expressed as percentage of the dose of administered APAP, resulted from
a net increase in functional liver mass. The possibility that the renal cortex or the intestine also
contributed to production of the excess of APAP-GLU in BDL group is less likely, since their UGT
activities were lower than that of the liver, and the increase in kidney mass in response to BDL was less
relevant when compared with the liver one.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
10
Liver glutathione conjugation of CDNB was severely impaired in BDL rats, whereas renal cortex
constituted the main place for its metabolism and subsequent elimination through urine (Villanueva et al.,
2006). It is known that Mrp3 has preference for glucuronides rather than for glutathione conjugates as
substrates (Hirohashi et al., 1999; Zelcer et al., 2001). Taken together, the evidence clearly demonstrates
tissue-specific differences in conjugation of different phase II substrates, as well as in re-distribution and
disposition of the corresponding conjugates, in this model of obstructive cholestasis.
In summary, we demonstrate that cholestasis by BDL led to a marked increase in liver synthesis
of APAP-GLU followed by its efficient urinary excretion, whereas intestinal elimination played a minor
role. This was consistent with upregulation of basolateral Mrp3 in liver and apical Mrp2 in renal cortex.
This may contribute to explain reduced sensitivity of BDL rats to APAP toxicity, as previously reported
(Acevedo et al., 1995). In contrast, dowregulation of renal Bcrp would indicate a minor role for this
protein in exacerbated urinary elimination of non-toxic metabolites of APAP.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We want to express our gratitude to Dr. J. Elena Ochoa for her valuable technical assistance. We also
thank Drs. Y. Sugiyama and H. Suzuki (University of Tokyo, Japan) for kindly providing the anti-rat
Mrp3 antibody and Dr. S. Ikushiro for kindly providing the anti-UGT1A6 antibody.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
11
REFERENCES
Acevedo C, Bengochea L, Tchercansky DM, Ouviña G, Perazzo JC, Lago N, Lemberg A, and Rubio MC (1995)
Cholestasis as a liver protective factor in paracetamol acute overdose. Gen Pharmacol 26:1619-24.
Aleksunes LM, Slitt AM, Cherrington NJ, Thibodeau MS, Klaassen CD, and Manautou JE (2005) Differential
expression of mouse hepatic transporter genes in response to acetaminophen and carbon tetrachloride. Toxicol Sci
3:44-52.
Belinsky MG, Dawson PA, Shchaveleva I, Bain LJ, Wang R, Ling V, Chen ZS, Grinberg A, Westphal H, Klein-
Szanto A, Lerro A, and Kruh GD. (2005) Analysis of the in vivo functions of Mrp3. Mol Pharmacol 68:160-168.
Cao J, Stieger B, Meier PJ, and Vore M (2002) Expression of rat hepatic multidrug resistance-associated proteins
and organic anion transporters in pregnancy. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 283:757-766.
Catania VA, Luquita MG, Sánchez Pozzi EJ, and Mottino AD (1998) Enhancement of intestinal UDP-
glucuronosyltranferase activity in partially hepatectomized rats. Biochim Biophys Acta 1380:345-353.
Catania VA, Sánchez Pozzi EJ, Luquita MG, Ruiz ML, Villanueva SSM, Jones B, and Mottino AD (2004) Co-
regulation of expression of phase II metabolizing enzymes and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2. Ann
Hepatol 3:11–17.
Dietrich C, Geier A, Salein N, Lammert F, Roeb E, Oude Elferink RP, Matern S, and Gartung C (2004)
Consequences of bile duct obstruction on intestinal expression and function of multidrug resistance-associated
protein 2. Gastroenterology 126:1044–1053.
Donner MG, and Keppler D (2001) Up-regulation of basolateral multidrug resistance protein 3 (Mrp3) in cholestatic
rat liver. Hepatology 34:351–359.
Gartung C, Ananthanarayanan M, Rahman MA, Schuele S, Nundy S, Soroka CJ, Stolz A, Suchy FL, and Boyer JL
(1996) Down-regulation of expression and function of the rat liver Na+/bile acid cotransporter in extrahepatic
cholestasis. Gastroenterology 110:199–209.
Ghanem CI, Ruiz ML, Villanueva SS, Luquita MG, Catania VA, Jones B, Bengochea LA, Vore M, and Mottino AD
(2005) Shift from biliary to urinary elimination of acetaminophen-glucuronide in acetaminophen-pretreated rats. J
Pharmacol Exp Ther 315:987-995.
Goon D, and Klaassen CD (1990) Dose-dependent intestinal glucuronidation and sulfation of acetaminophen in the
rat in situ. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 252:201-207.
Gotoh Y, Suzuki H, Kinoshita S, Hirohashi T, Kato Y, and Sugiyama Y (2000) Involvement of an organic anion
transporter (canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter/multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 in
gastrointestinal secretion of glutathione conjugates in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 292:433–439.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
12
Hauser SC, Ransil BJ, Ziurys JC, and Gollan JL (1988) Interaction of uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronic acid with
microsomal UDP-glucuronosyltransferase in primate liver: the facilitating role of uridine 5'-diphospho-N-
acetylglucosamine. Biochim Biophys Acta 967:141-148.
Hirohashi T, Suzuki H, and Sugiyama Y (1999) Characterization of the transport properties of cloned rat multidrug
resistance-associated protein 3 (Mrp3). J Biol Chem 274:15181-15185
Howie D, Adriaenssens PI, and Prescott LF (1997) Paracetamol metabolism following overdosage: application of
high performance liquid chromatography. J Pharm Pharmacol 9:235–237.
Ikushiro S, Emi Y, and Iyanagi T (1995) Identification and analysis of drug responsive expression of UDP-
glucuronosyltransferase family 1 (UGT1) isozyme in rat hepatic microsomes using anti-peptide antibodies. Arch
Biochem Biophys 324:267-272.
Kessler FK, Kessler MR, Auyeung DJ, and Ritter JK (2002) Glucuronidation of acetaminophen catalyzed by
multiple rat phenol UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Drug Metab Dispos 30:324-330.
König J, Rost D, Cui Y, and Keppler D (1999) Characterization of the human multidrug resistance protein isoform
MRP3 localized to the basolateral hepatocyte membrane. Hepatology 29:1156-1163.
Lee JM, Trauner M, Soroka CJ, Stieger B, Meier PJ, and Boyer JL (2000) Expression of the bile salt export pump is
maintained after chronic cholestasis in the rat. Gastroenterology 118:163-172.
Lee J, Azzaroli F, Wang L, Soroka CJ, Gigliozzi A, Setchell KDR, Kramer W, and Boyer JL (2001) Adaptive
regulation of bile salt transporters in kidney and liver in obstructive cholestasis in the rat. Gastroenterology
121:1473–1484.
Manautou JE, de Waart DR, Kunne C, Zelcer N, Goedken M, Borst P, and Elferink O (2005) Altered disposition of
acetaminophen in mice with a disruption of the Mrp3 gene. Hepatology 42:1091-1098.
Mottino AD, Hoffman T, Jennes L, and Vore M (2000) Expression and localization of multidrug resistant protein
mrp2 in rat small intestine. J Pharm Exp Ther 293:717–723.
Ogawa K, Suzuki H, Hirohashi T, Ishikawa T, Meier PJ, Hirose K, Akizawa T, Yoshioka M, and Sugiyama Y
(2000) Characterization of inducible nature of MRP3 in rat liver. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 278:438–
446.
Paulusma CC, Kothe MJ, Bakker CT, Bosma PJ, van Bokhoven I, van Marle J, Bolder U, Tytgat GN, and Oude
Elferink RP (2000) Zonal down-regulation and redistribution of the multidrug resistance protein 2 during bile duct
ligation in rat liver. Hepatology 31:684-693.
Rost D, Mahner S, Sugiyama Y, and Stremmel W (2002) Expression and localization of the multidrug resistance-
associated protein 3 in rat small and large intestine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 282:720-726.
Ruiz ML, Villanueva SS, Luquita MG, Vore M, Mottino AD, and Catania VA (2006) Ethynylestradiol increases
expression and activity of rat liver MRP3. Drug Metab Dispos 34:1030-1034.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
13
Soroka CJ, Lee JM, Azzaroli F, and Boyer JL (2001) Cellular localization and up-regulation of multidrug resistance-
associated protein 3 in hepatocytes and cholangiocytes during obstructive cholestasis in rat liver. Hepatology
33:783–791.
Suzuki M, Suzuki H, Sugimoto Y, and Sugiyama Y (2003) ABCG2 transports sulfated conjugates of steroids and
xenobiotics. J Biol Chem 278:22644-22649.
Tanaka Y, Kobayashi Y, Garbazza E, Higuchi K, Kamisako T, Kuroda M, Takeuchi K, Iwasa K, Kaito M, and
Adachi Y (2002) Increased renal expression of bilirubin glucuronide transporters in a rat model of obstructive
jaundice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 282:656–662.
Tanaka Y, Slitt AL, Leazer TM, Maher JM, and Klaassen CD (2005) Tissue distribution and hormonal regulation of
the breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp/Abcg2) in rats and mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 326:181-187.
Thomas SH (1993) Paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning. Pharmacol Ther 60:91–120.
Trauner M, Arrese M, Soroka CJ, Ananthanarayanan M, Koeppel TA, Schlosser SF, Suchy FJ, Keppler D, and
Boyer JL (1997) The rat canalicular conjugate export pump (Mrp2) is down-regulated in intrahepatic and obstructive
cholestasis. Gastroenterology 113:255-264.
Villanueva SS, Ruiz ML, Luquita MG, Sánchez Pozzi EJ, Catania VA, and Mottino AD (2005) Involvement of
Mrp2 in hepatic and intestinal disposition of dinitrophenyl-S-glutathione in partially hepatectomized rats. Toxicol
Sci 84:4-11.
Villanueva SS, Ruiz ML, Soroka CJ, Cai SY, Luquita MG, Torres AM, Sánchez Pozzi EJ, Pellegrino JM, Boyer JL,
Catania VA, and Mottino AD (2006) Hepatic and extrahepatic synthesis and disposition of dinitrophenyl-S-
glutathione in bile duct-ligated rats. Drug Metab Dispos 34:1301-1309.
Xiong H, Turner KC, Ward ES, Jansen PL, and Brouwer KL (2000) Altered hepatobiliary disposition of
acetaminophen glucuronide in isolated perfused livers from multidrug resistance-associated protein 2-deficient TR(-
) rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 295:512–518.
Zakim D, and Vessey DA (1977) Regulation of microsomal UDP-glucoronyltransferase. Mechanism of activation
by UDP-N-acetylglucosamine. Biochem Pharmacol 26:129-131.
Zamek-Gliszczynski MJ, Hoffmaster KA, Tian X, Zhao R, Polli JW, Humphreys JE, Webster LO, Bridges AS,
Kalvass JC, and Brouwer KL (2005) Multiple mechanisms are involved in the biliary excretion of acetaminophen
sulfate in the rat: role of Mrp2 and Bcrp1. Drug Metab Dispos 33:1158-1165.
Zamek-Gliszczynski MJ, Nezasa K, Tian X, Kalvass JC, Patel NJ, Raub TJ, and Brouwer KL (2006) The important
role of Bcrp (Abcg2) in the biliary excretion of sulfate and glucuronide metabolites of acetaminophen, 4-
methylumbelliferone, and harmol in mice. Mol Pharmacol 70:127-133.
Zelcer N, Saeki T, Reid G, Beijnen JH, and Borst P (2001) Characterization of drug transport by the human
multidrug resistance protein 3 (ABCC3). J Biol Chem 276:46400-46407.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
14
Zelcer N, van de Wetering K, de Waart R, Scheffer GL, Marschall HU, Wielinga PR, Kuil A, Kunne C, Smith A,
van der Valk M, Wijnholds J, Elferink RO, and Borst P (2006) Mice lacking Mrp3 (Abcc3) have normal bile salt
transport, but altered hepatic transport of endogenous glucuronides. J Hepatol 44:768-775.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
15
Footnotes:
This work was supported by grants from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica,
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, and Universidad Nacional de Rosario,
Argentina.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
DMD #18127
16
FIGURE LEGENDS
Fig 1. Biliary, intestinal and urinary excretion of APAP-GLU.
Excretion of APAP-GLU, a common substrate for both Mrp2 and Mrp3, in bile (A), intestinal perfusate
(B), and urine (C) was evaluated at 10, 15 or 30 min periods, respectively, after administration of a 150
mg/Kg b.w. dose of APAP. Insets depict cumulative excretion of APAP-GLU by 150 min. The total
amount of APAP-GLU excreted by the whole organs, expressed as percentage of the amount of APAP
administered, is depicted in Fig 1D for the dose of 150 mg/Kg b.w. (left) or for the dose of 1 g/Kg b.w.
(right). Data are means ± SD of 3 animals per group.
* significantly different from Sham group (p < 0.05).
** significantly different from Sham group (p < 0.01).
Fig 2. Expression of Mrp2, Mrp3, Bcrp (panel A) and UGT1A6 (panel B) in liver, intestine and
kidney.
Twenty µg of protein from hepatic homogenates and 40 µg from jejunum and renal cortex homogenates
were loaded in the gels for simultaneous detection of Mrp2 and Mrp3. 60 µg of protein from liver and
renal cortex homogenates were loaded in the gels for detection of Bcrp. Fifteen µg of protein from hepatic
and renal cortex microsomes and 30 µg from jejunum microsomes were loaded in the gels for detection of
UGT1A6. These amounts of protein gave a densitometric signal in the linear range of the response curve
for the different antibodies. Uniformity of loading and transfer from gel to nitrocellulose membrane was
controlled with Ponceau S. Data on densitometry are means ± SD of 3 animals per group. Bcrp was not
detected in jejunum in spite that 100 µg of protein were loaded in the gel.
* significantly different from Sham group (p < 0.05).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on December 20, 2007 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018127
at ASPE
T Journals on A
ugust 19, 2019dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from