Hbsc3403_v2 - Planning and Assessing Science Teaching & Learning

7
ASSIGNMENT / TUGASAN ________________________________________________________________________ HBSC3403_V2 PLANNING AND ASSESSING SCIENCE TEACHING & LEARNING/ MERANCANG DAN MENILAI PENGAJARAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN SAINS MAY 2015 SEMESTER / SEMESTER MEI 2015 PEDALAMAN

description

HBSC3403_V2 - PLANNING AND ASSESSING SCIENCE TEACHING & LEARNING

Transcript of Hbsc3403_v2 - Planning and Assessing Science Teaching & Learning

ASSIGNMENT / TUGASAN ________________________________________________________________________

HBSC3403_V2

PLANNING AND ASSESSING SCIENCE TEACHING & LEARNING/

MERANCANG DAN MENILAI PENGAJARAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN SAINS

MAY 2015 SEMESTER / SEMESTER MEI 2015

PEDALAMAN

INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS / ARAHAN KEPADA PELAJAR1. This assignment contains only ONE (1) question that is set in both Malay and English. / Tugasan ini mengandungi SATU (1) soalan sahaja yang disediakan dalam bahasa Melayu dan bahasa Inggeris.2. Answer in Malay or English. / Jawab dalam bahasa Melayu atau bahasa Inggeris.

3. Download the language version of the assignment template concerned from the MyVLE for preparation and submission of your assignment. Your assignment should be typed using 12 point Times New Roman font and 1.5 line spacing. / Muat turunkan templat tugasan versi bahasa yang berkenaan daripada MyVLE untuk penyediaan dan penyerahan tugasan anda. Tugasan anda hendaklah ditaip dengan menggunakan saiz fon 12 Times New Roman dan langkau baris 1.5. 4. Your assignment should be between 2500 to 3000 words excluding references. Do not copy the assignment question and instructions to your answer. Only assignment answer developed within the approximate word limit will be assessed. The number of words should be shown at the end of your assignment. / Tugasan anda hendaklah mengandungi 2500 hingga 3000 patah perkataan tidak termasuk rujukan. Bilangan perkataan hendaklah ditunjukkan di hujung tugasan anda. Jangan menyalin soalan dan arahan tugasan dalam jawapan anda. Pemeriksa tidak akan membaca jawapan tugasan yang melebihi had patah perkataan yang dibenarkan. Jumlah perkataan hendaklah dinyatakan di penghujung tugasan anda. 5. You must submit your assignment TO YOUR FACE-TO-FACE TUTOR. You are advised to keep a copy of your submitted assignment for personal reference. / Anda dikehendaki menghantar tugasan KEPADA TUTOR BERSEMUKA. Anda dinasihatkan menyimpan salinan tugasan yang diserahkan untuk rujukan sendiri. 6. Your assignment must be submitted before 30th June 2015. Submission after 30th June 2015 will NOT be accepted. / Tugasan anda hendaklah diserahkan sebelum 30hb Jun 2015. Serahan selepas 30hb Jun 2015 TIDAK akan diterima.

7. Your assignment should be prepared individually. You should not copy another persons assignment. You should also not plagiarise another persons work as your own. / Tugasan hendaklah disiapkan secara individu. Anda dilarang meniru tugasan orang lain. Anda juga dilarang sama sekali memplagiat kerja orang lain sebagai kerja sendiri.

8. Please take note that PENALTY will be imposed on late submission of assignment as specified in the Registrars Office circular 6/2012 (Refer to Registrars Announcement in myVLE). / Sila ambil maklum tentang PENALTI yang akan dikenakan ke atas penghantaran lewat tugasan seperti yang tertera di pekeliling pejabat Pendaftar 6/2012 (Rujuk Registrars Announcement di myVLE).EVALUATION / PENILAIAN

This assignment accounts for 25% of the total marks for the course and shall be assessed based on the Rubrics or Answer Scheme attached. You would be given feedback on the assignment before the Final Semester Examination commences. /

Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 25% daripada jumlah markah kursus berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik atau Skema Jawapan yang dilampirkan. Anda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan Akhir Semester bermula.

PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION / PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH

Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. If plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows: /

Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan, secara automatik, akan disemak untuk menentukan kadar pertindihan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong seperti berikut:

No. / Bil.Similarity Percentage /

Kadar PertindihanMarks Deduction /

Potongan Markah

1.0 300

2.30.01 505

3.50.01 70 10

4.70.01 - 100100

ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

You are assigned as a teacher for the lower secondary school. Choose ONE topic from the Science syllabus and prepare a two hour lesson plan by using the 5E Learning Cycle. Discuss in detail the requirement for development of performance assessment if you plan to conduct a summative test. Prepare the summative test questions that consist of FIVE objective questions and TWO structural questions by using the Blooms Taxonomy. Then create a table of test specification that shows the topics that will be evaluated for the test.[Total: 40 marks]

SOALAN TUGASAN

Anda ditugaskan sebagai seorang guru di sebuah sekolah menengah rendah. Pilih SATU topik dalam silibus Sains dan sediakan satu rancangan pengajaran selama dua jam dengan menggunakan Kitaran Pembelajaran 5E. Bincangkan dengan terperinci keperluan untuk membangunkan penilaian prestasi jika anda merancang untuk menjalankan ujian sumatif. Sediakan soalan ujian sumatif yang terdiri daripada LIMA soalan objektif dan DUA soalan struktur dengan menggunakan Taksonomi Bloom. Kemudian sediakan jadual spesifikasi ujian yang menunjukkan topik-topik yang akan dinilai dalam ujian tersebut.[Jumlah: 40 markah]

ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS Criteria Weight Missing

Item Low Fair Above average Excellent Max Marks

01234

Introduction0.5There is no introduction to the paper.The introduction does not mention the structure and objectives of the assignment and important concepts.The introduction previews the structure of the assignment in a clear manner.The introduction previews the structure of the assignment and objectives in a clear manner.The introduction previews the structure and objectives of the assignment. Important concepts were also clearly explained.2

Topic covered in the Sciences syllabus1No discussion on topic covered in the Science syllabus.No focus on the topic covered in the Sciences syllabus.The topic covered in the Science syllabus was vaguely described..Described in sufficient details of the topic covered in the Science syllabus.Topic covered in the science syllabus was described clearly.Described clearly the details of the topic covered in the Science syllabus.The topic covered in the science syllabus was described in detail.4

Daily Lesson Plan using 5E Learning Cycle2There was no lesson plan.The lesson plan did not use the 5E Learning Cycle.The lesson plan used the 5E Learning Cycle but was incomplete with simple description.Although the 5E lesson plan was complete it lacked details in description.The 5E lesson plan was complete with detailed descriptions.8

Development of Performance Assessment 2No discussion on development of performance assessment.Incomplete, inaccurate and not relevant discussion on development of performance assessment. Only able to state and elaborate at least 2 step of the process. The content is incomplete, inaccurate and less relevant. Able to state and elaborate at least 3 levels of the process. The content is complete, accurate and relevant. Able to state and elaborate 4 steps of the process. The content is comprehensive, accurate and relevant . Shows a deep understanding of information.8

Summative test 2There were no questions prepared or all the questions were prepared wrongly.

Able to prepare only objective questions but not accordingly to the Bloom Taxonomy.Able to prepare all the questions but not according to the Bloom Taxonomy.Able to prepare all the objective questions correctly according to the Bloom Taxonomy however the structural questions did not follow the Bloom Taxonomy.Showed deep understanding of the information gathered.

Able to prepare all the questions correctly according to the Bloom Taxonomy.8

Table of Specification 2There was no Table of Test Specification.Able to prepare the Table of Test Specification but did not matched to the correct criteria.Successfully prepared the Table of Test Specification and matched to the correct criteria for certain questions.Successfully prepared the Table of Test Specification and matched to the correct criteria. (Only for the objective questions).Successfully prepared the Table of Specification and matched to the correct criteria for all questions.8

Organisation

0.5Not relevant.Many details were not in logical order. There was little sense that the writing was organised.Details were not in logical order and distracts the reader.Details were placed in a logical order but presented less effectivelyDetails were placed in a logical order and presented effectively. The paper was interesting.2

TOTAL MARKS 40

2