HAL DEPAN THESIS 14 feb 2014 - digilib.uns.ac.id · is better than Role-Play Method in teaching...

perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id

commit to user

THESIS

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DISCUSSION METHOD IN TEACHING SPEAKING SKILL

VIEWED FROM THE STUDENTS’ INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT

(An Experimental Research on the Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 7 Purworejo in the Academic Year of 2012/2013)

By

BAMBANG HIRUSETYADI (S 891108024)

Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Graduate Degree of English Education

MAGISTER PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY

SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY SURAKARTA

2014


commit to user

APPROVAL

THESIS

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DISCUSSION METHOD IN TEACHING SPEAKING SKILL

VIEWED FROM THE STUDENTS’ INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT

(An Experimental Research on the Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 7 Purworejo in the Academic Year of 2012/2013)

By

Bambang Hirusetyadi (S 891108024)

This thesis has been approved by the Consultants and Head of Magister Program

of English Education of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret University Surakarta

In December 2013

Consultant I

Dr. Ngadiso, M. Pd NIP 196212311988031009

Consultant II

Dra. Dewi Rochsantiningsih, M.Ed., Ph.D. NIP 19600918 198702 2001

Approved by

Head of English Education Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of

Sebelas Maret University

Dr. Abdul Asib, M.Pd NIP 19520307 198003 1 005

ii


commit to user


commit to user

PRONOUNCEMENT

This is to certify that I myself write this thesis entitled “The Effectiveness

of Discussion Method in Teaching Speaking Skill Viewed from The Students’

Intelligence Quotient” (An Experimental Research on the Tenth Grade of SMA

Negeri 7 Purworejo in the Academic Year of 2012/2013). It is not plagiarism or

made by others. Anything related to others’ works is written in quotation, the

sources of which are listed on the list of references.

If then this pronouncement proves wrong, I am ready to accept my

academic punishment, including the withdrawal or cancellation of my academic

degree.

Surakarta, November 2013

Bambang hirusetyadi S891108024

iv


commit to user

MOTTO

· Saying Bismillah before doing something in order to get the blessing of

Allah S.W.T.

· Saying Alhamdulillah as many as possible because many good things,

blesses and fortunes have been given to us by Allah S.W.T, the Almighty,

the Creator of the universe.

DEDICATION

v


commit to user

This work is dedicated to:

· My beloved wife and son

· My beloved parents, brothers and sisters

· My beloved teachers and lecturers

· My beloved colleagues and friends

· My students

vi


commit to user

ABSTRACT

Bambang Hirusetyadi, S 891108024, 2013. The Effectiveness of Discussion Method in Teaching Speaking Skill Viewed from The Students’ Intelligence Quotient (An Experimental Research on the Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 7 Purworejo in the Academic Year of 2012/2013). A thesis, English Education Department of Graduate School, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta. Consultan I: Dr. Ngadiso, M.Pd; Consultant II: Dra.Dewi Rochsantiningsih, M.Ed. Ph.D.

The aims of this research are to describe whether: (1) Discussion Method is better than Role-Play Method in teaching speaking skill; (2) The speaking skill of students having high IQ is better than that of those having low IQ; and(3) There is an interaction between the methods of teaching and students’ intelligence quotient.

This experimental research was carried out at SMA Negeri 7 Purworejo from 26 January 2013 to 25 March 2013. The sample was taken using cluster sampling from the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 7 Purworejo. The sample consists of 60 students which are divided into two classes, X.9 consisting of 30 students as an experimental class and class X.8 consisting of 30 students as a control class. School documents were used to get scores of students’ intelligence quotient. After treatment was conducted in 8 meeting, the researcher conducted a speaking test to get the research data. Having got the research data, researcher analyzed the data in term of their frequency distribution, normality of the sample distribution, and data homogeneity. Then, researcher used ANOVA test (multifactor analysis of variance) to test the research hypotheses. Referring to the summary of multifactor analysis of variance, it can be concluded that: (1) Discussion method is more effective than role-play method in teaching speaking skill for the tenth grade of SMAN 7 Purworejo in the Academic Year of 2012/2013; (2) Students having high IQ do not have a significant difference in speaking skill than those having low IQ for the tenth grade of SMAN 7 Purworejo in the Academic Year of 2012/2013; and (3) There is no interaction between teaching methods (discussion and role-play method) and students’ IQ in teaching speaking skill for the tenth grade of SMAN 7 Purworejo in the Academic Year of 2012/2013.

The result of the research implies that discussion method is a very effective method to teach speaking skill to the tenth grade students. Therefore it is recommended that (1) teachers apply the discussion method in teaching speaking skill because it is proved to be a good method; (2) teachers motivate students to be more active and involved in the teaching and learning process to improve speaking skill; and (3) teachers encourage students to explore and develop their knowledge as a base to speak or convey their opinion and ideas in speaking class actively. Key words: Discussion Method, Role-Play, speaking skill, intelligence quotient,

experimental study.

vii


commit to user

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Bismillah, the researcher would like to say Alhamdullillah, all of the

praises are just for Allah S.W.T, the creator of this universe who has given him

everything so that he can finally complete the thesis. In addition, he is unable to

finish the study without the contributions, helps, suggestions, and comments from

so many people that he would like to express his gratitude to:

1. Prof. Dr. Ir. Ahmad Yunus, M.S, the Director of Graduate School of

Sebelas Maret University for his guidance.

2. Prof. Dr. M. Furqon Hidayatullah, M.Pd, the Dean of Teacher Training

and Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret University for his guidance.

3. Dr. Abdul Asib, M.Pd, the Head of English Education Department of

Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret University for

his guidance.

4. Dr. Ngadiso, M.Pd, the first consultant for his valuable guidance,

suggestions, and criticism in completing this thesis.

5. Dra. Dewi Rochsantiningsih, M.Ed. Ph.D, the second consultant for her

valuable guidance, suggestions, and criticism in completing this thesis.

6. The lecturers of English Education of Sebelas Maret University Surakarta,

for their lectures, guidance, suggestions, and criticism.

7. The Principal of SMA Negeri 7 Purworejo, for his permission to pursue a

Magister degree at the English Education of Teacher Training and

Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret University Surakarta.

8. His research collaborator, all colleagues and friends for their supports.

9. All students of SMAN 7 Purworejo.

Finally, the researcher always expects criticism from any readers to make this

thesis better. Then, he hopes that this research can give an important

contribution to the development of education.

Surakarta, .. November 2013

Researcher

viii


commit to user

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

TITLE PAGE .......................................................................................................... i APPROVAL PAGE BY THE ADVISORS......................................................... ii LEGITIMATION PAGE BY THE EXAMINERS ............................................. iii PRONOUNCEMENT ........................................................................................... iv MOTTO ................................................................................................................. v DEDICATION ....................................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................ xi LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................. xii LIST OF APPENDICES ..................................................................................... xiii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1

A. Background of the Study ........................................................................... 1 B. Identification of the Problems ................................................................... 4 C. Limitation of the Problems ........................................................................ 5 D. Problems Statement ................................................................................... 5 E. Objectives of the Study .............................................................................. 6 F. Benefits of the Study.................................................................................. 6

CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW.............................................................. 8

A. Theoretical Descriptions ............................................................................ 8 1. Speaking

a. Definition of Speaking ..................................................................... 8 b. Speaking Skill in ELT .................................................................... 10 c. Characteristics of Successful Speaking Activities........................ 12 d. Speaking Assessment ..................................................................... 14 e. Micro skills and Macro skills of Speaking.................................... 18

2. Discussion Method a. The Definition of Discussion Method ........................................... 20 b. Teaching Steps ............................................................................... 21 c. The Advantages .............................................................................. 24 d. The Disadvantages ......................................................................... 26

3. Role-Play Method a. Definition of Role-Play Method .................................................... 26 b. Teaching Steps ............................................................................... 27 c. Advantages ..................................................................................... 29

ix


commit to user

d. Disadvantages ................................................................................. 30

4. The Comparison between Discussion Method and Role-Play Method in Teaching Speaking a. General principles ........................................................................... 31 b. Teaching Steps ................................................................................ 31

5. Intelligence Quotient a. Definition of Intelligence ............................................................... 32 b. Types of Intelligence ...................................................................... 33 c. Factors Influencing IQ.................................................................... 38

B. Review of Related Research.................................................................... 39 C. Rationale ................................................................................................... 43 D. Hypotheses ............................................................................................... 46

CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY

A. The Place and Time of research .............................................................. 47 B. The Research Method .............................................................................. 47 C. Population, Sample, and Sampling ......................................................... 49 D. Techniques of Collecting Data ................................................................ 50 E. Techniques of Analyzing Data ................................................................ 51 F. Statistical Hypotheses .............................................................................. 56

CHAPTER IV. RESEARCH FINDING

A. The Implementation of the research ....................................................... 58 B. The Description of the Data .................................................................... 62 C. The Normality and Homogeneity Test ................................................... 71 D. Hypothesis Test ........................................................................................ 72 E. Discussion of the Result of the Study ......................................................74

CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION, IMPLICATION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 83 B. Implication and Suggestion ..................................................................... 84

BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................ 88

APPENDICES ...................................................................................................... 93

x


commit to user

LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table 2.1 Ur’s scoring of speaking test........................................................... ..16

Table 2.2 Weir’s scoring of speaking test ........................................................ 17

Table 2.3 The comparison between discussion method and role-play Method ................................................................................................ 31

Table 2.4 IQ classification ................................................................................. 37

Table 3.1 Research Time Schedule ................................................................... 47

Table 3.2 The diagram of factorial design 2 X 2 .............................................. 48

Table 3.3 The design of multifactor analysis of variance ................................ 53

Table 4.1 The summary of the implementation of the research ...................... 58

Table 4.2 Frequency Distribution of Data A 1 .................................................. 63

Table 4.3 Frequency Distribution of Data A 2 .................................................. 64

Table 4.4 Frequency Distribution of Data B 1 .................................................. 65

Table 4.5 Frequency Distribution of Data B 2 .................................................. 66

Table 4.6 Frequency Distribution of Data A1B1 ............................................... 67




Table 4.10 Normality Test ................................................................................. 71

Table 4.11 Homogeneity Test.............................................................................. 72

Table 4.12 Multifactor Analysis of Variance .................................................. 73

xi


commit to user

LIST OF FIGURES

Page

Figure 4.1 The Histogram and Polygon of Data A1 (Experimental class taught by using discussion method)……. .... 63

Figure 4.2 The Histogram and Polygon of Data A2

(Control class taught by using role-play method).......................... 64

Figure 4.3 The Histogram and Polygon of Data B1

(Students having high IQ) .............................................................. 65

Figure 4.4 The Histogram and Polygon of Data B2

(Students having low IQ) ............................................................... 66

Figure 4.5 The Histogram and Polygon of Data A1B1

(Students having high IQ taught by using discussion method) .... 67


(Students having high IQ taught by using role-play method) ....... 68


(Students having low IQ taught by using discussion method)..…69


(Students having low IQ taught by using role-play method) ........ 70

xii


commit to user

LIST OF APPENDICES

Page

Appendix 1 Lesson Plan for experiment class ............................................... 93

Appendix 2 Lesson Plan for control class ..................................................... 96

Appendix 3 Readability of speaking test ....................................................... 99

Appendix 4 Score 1 of speaking test ........................................................... 102

Appendix 5 Score 2 of speaking test ........................................................... 106

Appendix 6 Average score of speaking test ................................................. 110

Appendix 7 High IQ and low IQ for experiment class ................................ 112

Appendix 8 High IQ and Low IQ for control class ...................................... 113

Appendix 9 Descriptive analysis of A1 ( Discussion Method) .................... 114

Appendix 10 Descriptive analysis of A2 ( Role-play Method) ...................... 115

Appendix 11 Descriptive analysis of B1 ( Discussion Method) .................... 116

Appendix 12 Descriptive analysis of B2 ( Discussion Method) .................... 117

Appendix 13 Descriptive analysis of A1B1 ( Discussion Method) ................ 118




Appendix 17 Normality test of A1

(Experimental class taught by using Discussion Method) ...... 122

Appendix 18 Normality test of A2

( Control class taught by using Role-play Method) ............... 123

Appendix 19 Normality test of B1 ( High IQ )................................................ 124

Appendix 20 Normality test of B2 ( Low IQ ) ................................................ 125

Appendix 21 Normality test of A1B1............................................................... 126

Appendix 22 Normality test of A2B1 .............................................................. 127



Appendix 25 Homogeneity test ....................................................................... 130

Appendix 26 Anova test .............................................................. 131

xiii


commit to user

HAL DEPAN THESIS 14 feb 2014 - digilib.uns.ac.id · is better than Role-Play Method in teaching...

Documents

Transcript of HAL DEPAN THESIS 14 feb 2014 - digilib.uns.ac.id · is better than Role-Play Method in teaching...