' ,

MINUTES OF THE 138'h• MEETING (SPECIAL MEETING) OF THE GOA ST ATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD HELD ON 29'"

MARCH, 2019, AT 11.30 AM, IN THE CONFERENCE HALL OF THE GOA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, SALIGAO.

I. The 138th meeti~ (Special meeting) of the Goa State Pollution Control Board was held on 29 March , 2019 at 11.30 a.m. in the Conference hall of the Goa State Pollution Control Board. '

The following members attended the meeting.

I. Mr. Ganesh Budhu Shetgaonkar, Chairman 2. Director of Mines and Geology was represented by Mr. Dee pale

Mavenkar 3. Director of Health Services was represented bv Dv, Director 4. Ms. Unnati Sahastrabhudhe, Panch member, Villaze Panchayat Velzuern 5. Mr, Rajsingh Rane, Councillor, Mapusa Municioal Council 6. Mr. Savio Messias, President, Travel and Tourism Association of Goa 7. Mr. Saniav Naik, Panch, Village Panchavat Sanvordem 8. Chairman of Confederation of Indian Industries was represented by

Vioce-Chairman, Mr. Blaise Costabir 9. Dr. Shamila Monteiro, Member Secretary

II. At the outset Member Secretary informed the members that this particular meeting was scheduled to be held on 1 s"" March, 2019. However, the board was ', than in receipt of complaints from one Adv. Sunaina Chari levelling allegations that the conduct of the Board meeting was in violation of the Model Code of Conduct. These complaints were forwarded to the Board by the Chief Electoral Officer. TI1e office of the Chief Electoral Officer considering the Board's reply to the aJlegations of Adv. Sunaina Chari directed the Board to place the matter before the Screening Committee. The approval of the Chief Electoral Officer for convening the Board meeting has now been received. Hence today's meeting was scheduled.

Member Secretary placed the complaints received from Adv. Sunaina Chari on behalf of various organisations before the Members. Members on perusing the allegations in the complaints have found the same to be baseless and untrue and have decided that the gcnuiness of the complaints and Adv. Sunaina Chari as well as the allegation in the complaint require to be investigated.

,

Decision: It was resolved that the matter be referred to the State Government for conducting a detailed inquiry in the matter and to probe the veracity of the

,._, same .

. . Agenda item qo, OJ Confirmation of the minutes of the 13 7'" meeting. (Special meeting) of the Board held on 21st February, 2019.

The minutes of the 137th meeting (Special meeting) of the Board held on 21st February, 2019 wereJorwarded_to the members vide this office letter'no. 4/137/19-PCB/Admn./19961 dated 22/02/2019 were confirmed so as to enter in the minutes Book.

Agenda item no. 02 Follow up action on the decision taken at the 137'" meeting (Special meeting) of the Board held on 21st February, 2019.

Agenda item no. 01 - With reference to the decision taken at the 137th meeting (Special meeting ) of the Board, Members have decided to amend the guidelines for imposition of Polluter Pays penalty of the Board as follows:

....,,.,.., ••..••.•..•.•. "' ,,u.LH_, •.••. ......,.,_,u,.,.., .•.••. V.A. •.•..•...•....•.•• ..., •..•.•.••.•.•

1 Oneratins Without the Consent of the Board Red Small 40% of fees /yr OR Rs. I 0000/yr. whichever is category hizher

Medium 40% of fees /yr OR Rs.15000/yr. whichever is hizher

Large 40% of fees /yr OR Rs.20000/yr. whichever is hizher ·"

Orange Small 15% of fees /yr OR Rs.5000/yr. whichever is category hizher

Medium 15% of fees /yr OR Rs. l 0000/yr. whichever is hiuher

Large 15% of fees /yr OR Rs.l 5000/yr. whichever is hizher

Green Small 10% of fees /yr OR Rs.2000/yr. whichever is category hiaher

Medium 10% of fees /yr OR Rs.5000/yr. whichever is hizher

Large 10% of fees /yr OR Rs. I 0000/yr. whichever is hizher

•

-~9

Categorization of the industry will be based on the year, violation is observed and not the prevailing categorisation.

2. Violations observed durtnz insnection a. Discharze/Emissiou/Bu rninz of Waste/Disposal of solid waste

Red Category 20% of fees/incident or Rs. 40,000/- whichever is hiaher

Orange Category 15% of fees/incident or Rs. 20,000/- ' whichever is hizher Green Category 10% of feesfin~Ldent or Rs. l 0,000/- -·

whichever is hizher b. I'l1sd1i,t'ge + Emission /Discharge + Noise / Emissions +

Dlsoosat.of Solid wa·ste . Red Category 3 0% of fees/incident or Rs. 50,000/- for

small units, whichever is hizher 30% of fess or Rs. 1 lakhs for medium units, whichever is hizher 30% of fess/incident or Rs. 2 lakhs for large units, whichever is hizher

Orange Category 25% of fees/incident or Rs. 25,000/- for small units, whichever is hizher 25% of fees/incident or Rs. 40,000/- for medium units, whichever is hizher 25% of fees/incident or Rs. 60,000/- for lame units, whichever is hi 1er

Green Category 20% of fees/incident or Rs. 25,000/-, whichever is hiaher

C, Exceecli,ng prescribed limits for Air I Water/ Noise/ Inefficient workina ef Pollution control devices Red Category 40% of fees or Rs. 1 lakh for small units,

whichever is higher --

40% of fess or Rs. 5 lak:hs for medium units, whichever is hizher 40% of fess or Rs. l O lakhs for large units, whichever is hisher

I Orange Category 30% of fees or Rs. 25,000/- for small units,

whichever is hizher 30% of fees or Rs. 50,000/- for medium unit_s, whichever is higher 30% of fees or Rs. 1 lak:h for large units, whichever is higher I

Green Category 20°/o of fees or Rs. 25,000/-, whichever is I hicher

1

• '

.

This penalty will be in addition to the late fees charged by the Board as stated above, who fail to apply for Renewal of Consent prior to expiry of validity or the establishments who are operating without the Consent of the Board which are 50% of the fees applicable and if the unit is found to be operating without the Consent of the Board.

It was further decided that if the establishment is still found violating, then the penalty will be double for every additional violation.

The above penalty is for industries/ estabJishmenY h_otels/ hospitals ~_t_~. ·who are under the-purview of Water and Air Act. However for violations under Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 including Construction and Demolition Waste and all other types of waste is as follows:

Severe ( ecologically Area less than 50 sq.mtrs. Rs.5000/- per sensitive areas/ heritage incident sites/ near educational Area between 50sq.mtrs. - Rs.10000/- per institutions, hospitals I 500sa.mtrs. incident places of worships I Area above 500sq.mtrs. Rs.25000/- per archaeological incident monuments/ CRZ areas/ water bodies) Medium ( in public Area less than 50sq.mtrs. Rs.2000/- per areas/along roads/ gardens/ incident orchard area/agricultural Area between 50sq.mtrs. - Rs.5000/- per land) 500sq.mtrs. incident

Area above 500sq.mtrs. Rs.10000/- per incident

Small ( any other location Area less than 50sq.mtrs. Rs.2000/- per not considered in severe incident and medium)

'

Agenda item no. 2 - (a) The members noted that Mis South West Port Limited (SWPL) and Mis Adani Mormugao Port Terminal Pvt. Ltd., (AMPTPL) have deposited an amount of Rs. 10 lakhs each as penalty in terms of Polluter pays Principle. (b) The members further noted that Amendment to Consent to Operate has been issued to Mis SWPL and Mis AMPTPL incorporating the conditions as decided by the Board. And that Mis AMPTPL has deposited a Bank Guarantee amounting to Rs. 1 Crore with a validity period in line to the Consent issued towards satisfactory compliance of the Consent conditions.

'

'

Agenda item no. 03 Consents issued under OCMMS Software (On-line Consent Management and Monitoring System) .

The members perused the details of Consents issued by the Board under OCMMS Software (On-line Consent Management and Monitoring System) from 6th February, 2019 to 7'" March, 2019, by the Delegated Authorities for grant of Consents under Red, Orange and Green category of Industries.

Agen'd,i item no. 04 Requisitioning of the services of the staff of the Board by the State Government

Member Secretary informed the members that the State Government while sanctioning various posts in the Goa State Pollution Control Board on J:0108/201 L, have stated that 'the State Government reserves the right to utilise the services of any or at! the Officers I Officials of the Goa State Pollution Control Board for its activities and any other task assigned from time to time. Further vide letter dated. I 1/07 /20 I 11, it is stated that the liability on account of expenditure incurred to meet the requirements of salaries and all other allcwarrces of the said posts shall vest with the GSPCB and shall be drawn from their own funds, with no liability on the Government.

Member Secretary further informed the members that the officials of the Board are trained in their respective fields and decided that henceforth no staff of the Board other than those already deputed in addition to their own work in GSPCB should be deputed to any other department or for election related work.

Agenda item no. 05 Application of Mis South West Port Ltd. (SWPL) for Consent to Operate under Air Act and Water Act

Member Secretary informed the members that the application of Mis South West Port Ltd. for renewal of Consent to Operate under the Air Act and the Water Act was discussed at the 1361h and J37'h meetings of the Board, since the unit had defaulted in carrying out operations during high wind conditions, the same was kept in abeyance. The Consent of J\1/s S\\'PL expires on 3 l/03/20 l 9.

• •

The members perused the various complaints received by the Board in this respect (enclosed as Annexure 'A'), same were read out by the Member Secretary. The members also perused the ambient air monitoring data for the months of January to March, 2019, the comments of Dr. Sengupta, former Member Secretary of Central Pollution Control Board, Mr. M.K. Verma, scientist, CPCB in connection with the Affidavit filed by Goa Foundation,

which includes observations of Dr. D.B. Boralkar. As regards to the submission made by Goa Foundation that the machinery of Mis SWPL is obsolete as per the submission made in National Green Tribunal, it is observed that the Board has issued NOC in July, 2016 for replacing the mobile harbour crane with grab ship unloader. from existing diesel engine to electric engine and was also granted Consent for modernisation and installation of rapid in motion wagon loading system at berth no. 5A and 6A in the year 20 I 3. With regard to issue of air quality in the Vasco city and surrounding areas, the reports of the AAQM for the months of January, February and March were placed before the Board.

______ The Board after taking int<:> COll~ideration !h_e Phase I report of Dr. Sethl of _ Source apportionment, comments of Dr. Sengupta, Ex. Member Secretary, Central Pollution Control Board on the IIT study as well as comments on N.K. Verma, ex- Scientist, Central Pollution Control Board and also the observation of Dr. Boralkar on the IIT study report decided to accept the recommendation made by Dr. Sengupta and N.K. Verma and direct MPT to implement the said recommendation.

The Board also took in consideration that the Source Apportionment study is in. progress and there is no conclusive evidence the high value of PM IO recorded at fuse call and Sada are due to handling of coal at berth no. 5A and 6A which is also a part observation made by Dr. Boralkar in his comments on behalf of Goa foundation and decided to recommend the renewal of Consent to operate at 0.4 MMT/month.

De •.. ~.ision: The Board resolved to grant renewal of Consent to Operate to Mis SWPL to handle coal at berth no. 5A and 6A for 0.4 MT/month and handling of • limestone and steel of I million MT/annum each for a further period of one year upto 3 I /03/2020.

The Board also resolved to direct Mis Morrnugao Port Trust (MPT) to include the recommendations made by Dr. Sen Gupta in the Source Apportionment Study and implementation of wind protection wall for dust emission control, including use of chemical binders and suppression.

The Board also resolved to direct MPT to implement the recommendations made by BITS Pilani in their study report and implement the measures on the other berths as the existing coal handling berths are already equipped with the record systems.

With reference to the conditions imposed on the units with regard to 'wind speed', the Board is in receipt of two representation from Mis South West Port Ltd. and Mis Adani Mormugao Port Terminal Pvt. Ltd. requesting to amend the Consent condition as issued vide addendum no. 5/356/18-PCB/CJ-5403 dated

•

25/02/2019. The unit has requested to change the condition 6 (XXV) 'The port handlers shall not carry out.activities when the wind speed is more than 10 km/hr. The unit has requested for permissible wind speed of l O m/s against the l O km/hr imposed by the Board.

After deliberations and scientific presentation made. by the Scientific staff of the Board (Annexure 'B' ) on the wind speed data, scales and studies, decided to amend the conditions of Consent to permit handling of coal upto wind speed of 30 kms/hr with the following conditions (i) Normal operations permitted upto a wind-speed of 28 km./hr. (i.e. Beaufort _s,-ale_c- Q_1)_. (ii) Precautionary

.... ···------~measured should be in place with proportionate scaling-down Operations when the wind-speed exceeds 28 km/hr. (i.e. Beaufort scale - 05) (iii) All operations should stop at a wicd-speed of 30 km./hr. and amend the Consent of Mis Adani Mormugao Port Terminal Pvt. Ltd. (AMPTPL) as well as of Mis SWPL accordingly. However, the condition·ofwind speed will not be applicable to rail wagon loading activities and during monsoons.

The Board also resolved to amend the conditions of Mis AMPTPL to reduce stack height to 9 metres and to improve his existing wind shield .

j"

·&. Agenda item no. 06 Request received from Mis Mormugoa Port Trust for coal handling at Mooring Dolphin l, 2 and 3

Member Secretary, informed the members that Mis Mormugao Port Trust has made an application to the Board for Consent to Operate for handling coal at Mooring Dolphin l, 2, and 3.

Members perused the agenda notes and· decided that Mis Mormugao Port Trust be called to make a presentation before the Board of his proposed activities. The item has been def en ed to the next Board meeting.

Agenda item no. 07 Request from M's Momrngao Port Trust for grant of Common Consent for the entire berth.

1 •

Member Sccretar, informed the members that Mis Mormugao Port Trust has made a request for grant of Common Consent for entire Port of Ml'T. On perusal of the request made hv the unit, the members decided that MPT makes a presentation before th, Board of the activities carried out at the Port and have deterred this item to the next Board meeting.

Agenda item no. 08 Revision of the of fees for Authorization issued by the Board under the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016

Member Secretary informed the members that the Board at its 122"• • th

meeting held on 28 November, 2016 had proposed to levy a fee of Rs. I 0,000/- for issue of Authorisation for Municipal Solid Waste. The fee was required to be reviewed in lieu of Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 which has included in its ambit Village Panchayat or any facility handling solid waste. Member Secretary further informed that the fees are ne_CJJlire!i tg' be imposed as the Board will be required to conduct-inspections, compilation of annual reports and attending to complaints.

It is now decided that the following fee structure be followed to levy fees for authorisation / approvals as folio

Municipal Councils I Coroorations Rs. 15,000/- Village Panchayats ( based on the grading of the Rs. 5,000/- to Panchayat Rs. 10,000/- Any other facilitv Rs. I 0,000/-

III. With the perrrussion of the Chairman, Member Secretary placed the following items for discussion:

Table item no. 01 Public Interest Litigation - Writ Petition no. 33 of2017

Memebr Secretary informed the members that the office was in receipt of ' a Notice from the Hon. High Court of Bombay at Goa Panaji, which was forwarded to the members, in respect of Public Interest Litigation - Writ Petition no. 33 of2017 -Kashinath Jairam Shetye and 15 Ors. V/s The State of Goa, through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Goa and 5 ors. wherein the Constitution of the Board has been challenged.

Member Secretary further informed the members that Notification constituting the Board is issued by the the Director/ Ex- officio Joint Secretary, Science, Technology and Environment in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (I) and (2) of section 4 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 (Central Act 6 of I 974), conveying the approval of the Government of Goa to re-constitute the Goa State Pollution Control Board for the period of three years from the date of Notification in Official Gazette.

Members after deliberations decided to write to the State Govenunent to defend the Board members in the Court of Law.

,

It was also resolved that the Board shall appoint an independent Advocate to defend the case in the Court of Law. The members also authorised Member Secretary and Chairman "to appoint an independent Advocate to defend the interest of the Chairman, Member Secretary and the Board members.

Table item no. 02 Categorisation of Industries

Members perused the categorisation of industries as below and decided to categorise as fol lows; a. -- Categorisation of marriage halls .... Under Green category of industries

b. Categorisation of units dealing in assembly of antenna ..... Under Green category

c. Categorisation of units carrying out metal primer application / hand painting activity for fabrication work under White category

d. Categorisation of manufacture of sanitary pads Category

under Greeri

Table item no. 03 Application of Mis Pravin Kumar Gosalia, for Renewal of Consent to Operate under the Air Act and the Water Act, T.C. no. 4/NSD/BAUX/68 located at Betul, Quepem Goa.

Member Secretary informed the members that the Board is in receipt of • an application from Mis Pravin Kumar Gosalia, for Renewal of Consent to Operate under the Air Act and the Water Act, T.C. no. 4/NSD/BAUX/68 located at Betul, Quepem Goa.

The members noted that the lease has expired, as such members suggested that the Board gets clarification from the unit in this regard.

IV. Th, meeting ended with thanks to the Chair.

'

\ __ .,_~j-;J\,<ij ( Dr. Shami la Monteiro)

Member Secretary

... ,~~q - ,.., ( Mr. "(J"anesh B. Shetgaonkar )

Chairman

,. ' _\',.

COJIJPLAINTS RECEl\'ED AGA1NS1 THE DUST POLLUTION

CAUSED DUE TO COAL I-lANDLING AT MPT.

I. Compfaiot By Mr.Savio Correia:

Board is in receipt of a Complaint/objection from Mr.Savio Correia dated

28/02/2019 and email, stating the units are still operating in the wind

' speed condition of greater that !OKM/hr. Complainanu:equested.tbat.the-- - -- --- -· -· -

I OKM/hr imposed by the board may be maintained. Also it is requested

that as ,i mitigation measure the stack height may be maintained to 6 meters only:

2. Compll!int from Goa Foundation dated 14/03/2019;19/03/2019 and ' , :,,

2 l/03/20tj):

Board is in receiptof an objection from Goa Foundation requesting no to

grant renewal of consent to Mis South west port ltd. It is submitted that

the two technical reports submitted by llT professor and BITS pilani

should not be relied upon. It is submitted that the IIT report on which the

board revoked the suspension of consent is a draft interim report and is ,

not based on empirical data or analysis Further states that the model

adopted isa complete failure since the actual emission levels are 14 times

what is assumed in the model. Secondly. complainant states that the

BlTS reports on the mooring dolphin is technical incompetent as the

wind rose are wrongly interpreted in the report.

c Complainant further register their objection with regards to application of

MPT for handling coal at mooring dolphin i ,2,3 stating that they have

not obtained any EC and the BTTS repo: 1· is technically incompetcnj

Complainant has requested that they r:1?'. he heard before taking ,m~

decision with regards in 1c;;e\vrl] of c,1J11-;_11' (\in1plainant has rcqcesred tint CTO renewal sh1J1_;Jd :101 be ~ranted !;.'1 enhancemern is hand] ing

.. ,

capacity to be issued, no CTO to be granted for coal handlmg at mooring

dolphin, Application of MPT for common consent should be adjoined.

• In the representation dated 21/03/2019 .it is submitted that Mis SWPL

has already imported coal in excess in past years by exceeding the

handling capacity and board vide order dated 9/0 l/20 l 8 directed SWPL

to halt the coal handling operations at the port. Further is submitted diat

the total quantities imported by SWPL in excess of th.e .consent terms are

equivalent to four year import handling and hence the CTO should. not be

granted for coal handling for .next fo.ur years.

• In above stated representation, it is stated that the opposition to Renewal

of Consent is in lieu of the admission made by SWPL in their petition

No. 173/2018 which seeks directions to the Central Government to

consider their application forenvieonmentat clearance.

3. Complainant from Goa First dated 08/3/2019

• Complainant bas stated that both the unit i.e Mis SWPL and Mis

AMPTPL are operating their conveyor belts and operation during the • night time thus creating noise pollution above 70c!BA against the 45 dBa

Standards. Complaint has requested that action may be initiated against the unit to reduce the noise levels.

•

4. Ccmplaint from Mr. Sherwin Correia,Goa First, l\1r. Ashley Ncronha, Aarn Admi Party.

The Board had also received letters from Mr. Sherwi 11 Correia and

others residents of Monnugao and Vasco da Gama daled 18/02/2019

sL:w1g that there is gross degeneration of air quality in thcrr locality due

t<.1 coal handling operations a1 the Port. Vide the said le11er, the

co;n31Ja_1_nant~ have also objected 10 resumption of coal handl ing activity

:11 l\1 Is h1ormug;10 }\)11 ·1 rust (1\,1_/Yf) and have demanded 1-0 be heard

before the Board . A similar representation was also received from 'Goa

First' dated 12/02/2019 and 18/02/2019, containing similar allegations

and demand regarding dust and noise pollution caused by SWPL and

AMPTPL. . The Board also received from the Aam Admi Party dated

18/02/2019 requesting the Board to revoke the Consent to Operate issued

by it to all the Coal handling units and Mis Mi'T on the ground that these - -- ---- - - -- - - --

companies do not have title of ownership on the land they are located

upon. They had also requested to be heard before the Board today. A

representation dated 12/02/2019 from Mr. Ashley Noronha, President

'Life is beautiful - NGO' has been received by the Board in which

concerns regarding health of the people including minor children has "- . . __ .:, neen. raisec.

5. l,etter received from Mormugoa Police station dated 11/02/2019

Le.tter received from Mormugoa Police station dated 11/02/2019

forwarding the Complaint of Goa First to GSPCB to take necessary

action for causing dust pollution and noise pollution by SWPL and

AMPTPL. •

6. Complainant from Mr Jaycsh Shetgoankar (J\1ormugoa Citizen

forum) dated 25/02/2019

• Complainant has submitted that they object to the revocation of the

directions. It is submitted that the JJT report is Draft interim report which

cannot be relied upon. Complainant has stated that the wind speed at port

is always around 13.6KMPH and 111,, board has given lOKM/br wind

speed thus the port 1s unsuitable forc, ,J handling at the port

7. Complainant Letter· from AUeixo Reginaldo Lourenco

Board is in receipt of an Complaint forwarded from the CM's office

forwarding the Complaint of Alleixo Reginaldo Lourenco

(MLA,Curtorim) regarding the dust pollution caused by the coal handling units at the MPT.

8, Representation from Goi! ,Fi.-stto no to issue CTO renewal t-o SWPL ----- ---- ----· "-

and mooring0dolpltine da."(ed 14/03/2019.

It is requested that the board sftollid not renew the CTO 0f Mis SViPL

and coal handling a mooring dolphin.It is submitted that the units are

operating even-at 10'1'i-M/hr wind speed.

!( Grievances flirn,ar-ded by O.epaJ'tittent of Environment and

Greveances- <11'paitinent r,e,garding coal and garbage -issues.

Complianant .Mr. Deepak Naik: has submitted complainant regarding dust

- pollution caused by SWPL and AMPTPL.

REPRESENTATION RECEIVED FROM PORT USERS

l. Letter from Morrnugna Port and Railway workers union dated 13/03/2019

Representation _ltave been recived from Monnugoa Port and Railway

workers union requesting t.o grant CTO to the Mis SWPL and grant

common consent lo the MJ'T.Also it is requested that full handling capacity of 62 .5 MMT may be granted to MPT.

2. Representation from Goa Porr and Dock Employee Union dated 18/03/2019

Reprc~cnl;,iJ•un has been i ecrvcd from Goa Port and Dock Employee

Union to 1;,·rant single consent 10 operate for /'vfPTC'"] 0 for mooring

dnlpln;1 for coal hand]rng ;:it i ,2,.l,,tu elax the l OK.J\'1/J Ir I estrict 1011,ro

~

grant consent to operate lo S\VPL for rrs original capacity and grant

permission for covered shed.

REPRESENTATION FROM MIS AMPTPL AND MIS SWPL

I. Mis AMl'TPL:

Board is in receipt of an letter dated 25/02/19 and dated 04/03/2019 from Mis

Adani Mormugoa Port terminal Pvt-Ltd requesting amendment in the consent

conditions as issued vide addendum 5/356/18PCB/CI-5402 dated

25102/2019.Unit has requested to change the condition 6(XXV) "The port

-handlers shall not carryout. activiti.es when the wind speed is more than lOKmlhr''.

Unit submits that, in their presentation dated 21/02/20 I 9(hearing) they had

submitted that at 45KM/Hr they stops their operations and in most of the other

ports the operations are stopped at 46KM/Hr (25Knots).It is submitted that as

per the US weather bureau description at wind speed of I OKm/Hr the same is

considered to be light wind.12Km/hr to 28Km/hr as moderate breeze and 29- •,

38Km/Hr as fresh wind and 39 and greater is considered as strong wind. Unit

has requested to consider wind speed as 45KM/br as maximum permissible

wind speed against the lOKM/hr imposed by the board.

Io the second letter dated 04/03/2019, unit has requested that to consider following

1. T11e waler sprinkling will be intensified at 25KM/H wind speed

11 Restriction for carrying out the normal operation not be made applicable

during the monsoon SC..-JSOJJ

111. Wind speed restriction ma , not be application dunnu the , ake loadrng

operations ~

~

Board is also in receipt of a Complaint/objection from Mr.Savio Correia dated

28/02/2019 and email, stating tbe units are still operating in tbe wind speed

condition of greater tbat IOKM/hr. Complainant requested that the l OKM/hr

imposed by the board may be maintained. Also it is requested that as a

·~~ .. .mitigation measure tbe stack height may bemaintained to 6 meters only.

2. l\1JS. SWPL

Board is in receipt of an letter dated 25/02/19 from Mis Soutbwest port Pvt Ltd

requesting amerulm.ent in the consent conditions as issued vide addendum.

5/356/l 8PCB/CI05403 dated 25/02/2019.Unit has requested to change the

condition 6(XXV) "The port handlers shall not carryout activities when the wind speed is more than I OKm/lir".

Unit has submitted that during the presentation on 21/02/2019 it was discussed •,

for 1 Orn/s wind speed. Also it was not discussed for daily average, weekly

average. It is submitted that as a normal practice .the port operations are stopped

at 25Knots (46KM/hr/l2.86m/s).lt is submitted that owing to special condition

they can stop the operations at 19.SK.nots (36Kin/br/l Om/sj.It is further

submitted that the grab ship OEM doesn't permit the operation above

20m/s.Unit submitted request to operate half of the wind speed as suggested in by the grab ship OEM ie to 1 Om/s.

ln the ;'-;f>,:.'ond letter dated 04/0:~/20 J 9, unit has requested that to consider follo\', mg

-r·i..c w:,'cr sprinJding wil! he i1rn.."11:-;,fied at 25K.MJH wind speed

A-___ ~

ii. Restriction for carrying· out the normal operation not be made applicable

during the monsoon season.

u1. Wind speed restriction may not be ,mplication during tfte rake loading

operations as they have in motion rake loadiag system.

Board is also in receipt of a Comi;1laiJJt!o:bjection from Mr.Savio Correia dated

28/02/20 I 9 and emailJ stating tlIB units are siill operating in the wind speed

condition of greater that 10.KM/hr. Complainant requested that the lOKM/br

imposed by the board may be maintained, Also it is requested that as a

mitigation measure the stack height may be maintained to 6 meters only.

In view of the above board may decide on the matter further.

•• •

0 .~ 't "' - " •••• r,J +-' ~ Cl.)

I l,.... s:::

=· ••• cs O 0 ...c: I 0 •,-., ~

u (/) -+-> •••••••• ro ·5 ~ u ~ •••••• 0 ~ ••••• H s -+-> , ,-.,

- =--.-= -- 0-. if) ~ ~---:-- • ---- ---

§" ,,-; 't u

'; E ~ s::: -+-> ro ~ .,..., Cl..l

"d 'D cs ~ Cl.)"' Q) Q) :....

C'-2 ·-= ...c: s ~ _(/) ;3 if) -cs -+->

= ~ • ,-; Cl.) (j .--< .--< -+-> :.... ~ ro ~ ~ Cl..l

'= ••••• +-' ~ u ~ = (I) 0 CS ;3 E: Q) ·_p I,... Cl)

~ - ,...:.. ro c:s : ~ ~

Q) t ~ '"C:l "' ~ tsst~~ •• I' = ' Q) ~ ~ s ~

+as "d ...c: o .,..., .s -"2 ~....,-Cl) d ro s::: :.... ·= = "d "d 0

~ Q) u "' (~ e u ro v ~ [ ••. 1 ~ +-' 0-. -+-l -+-> . • ,--< if) if) 0 . ,_, tlA&'i• ~HI S:::'t [~ fi;~ V . ,_,

a Q) "d "d E: f!'' . ' " :I,- ,,--< ~ ~ Cl..l ;3 ~r~ u ,,-; :....

Cl) ;j 8: cs ~

~ ., '

• •

.

.-

Q) .c: Q I- Q) ~ ...c: - . .•...• "'O C: ~ Q) 0 Q) '-' Q) £ ~ 0.. (/) ..•....• g (f) Q) 0 V) OJ ...,_. -a. - ro. a> C: '"O "'O ••••••• -0 l:> cu C: C: If) C: •.•..... c: -~ ~ C0 ro 1§ 0 '" .--.. .•..... - ,;, :.;:::. ~ I !I) (/) <;I) i:::'. (.) ..••.• ..••... cu ,_

•• __. ""O O O "'O , ~.cc:: c:©E c: • ·--: -o ·- ~ _,_.. . = ·-~

""O ·~ 3 _ ro ,_ ro ~ >-, .;c >, r-- >-, 0 :::i (I) ..o 3 -.::: -a::i- _o co o- ..s:::: -0 c:: (l) 0 -0 (/) +-' (L) I;;;.; .c: ..•.... Q) (l) (U - N e t ~ Q) ~ 0 ·;::: - 0 C0 CL O '"O ..S:::: Q) C: - -- ----- (/) '+- Q) --,-· __. Z..c:-.:::;_ o-0> (.) .g (l) ~ C: -0 -- cu C: (U (.) - 0 ·- C: O') (.) !l) m w Q. z 3 ·:s: c: -~ ~ ...c: . == E O> ._ . V) en (.) ""O ~ E C O ·;::: 2 (l) c (l.)LU e e Q)"O ::lf1

. 0 -Fl __. '+- ......, ({) Q) . S:: C: (l.) ..- c:-- r:::: w cu a> E · = §~ l 0 -~ 0 0 >-, Q) 0.. (I) ·,--• • E ·- ,_ ,_ ti) Q) .

-o 'i7- cu m o c: en (l) o c CU......,> C: Q.> o CU..r::: ·- ·- - (/) . ·- ..c (l) - ~ 9 1,1) cu C: .•.....• ..•...• ••..• ••••• "-' ID <F> 0-'---""'- ,- - Q) V) Q) - '"' . ,u - Q) ..S:::: ·- - Q) '" C O....c: £ -- -0 - Q)'- ..c: (/) •••.•• - Q) -0 cu - ..,..., --

(/) 0)- ..•...••....••..•.• o '+- c: cu ::J u ro ·- ....,,

Cl) E· o w . . 0) (/) en ,_ g- a5 - <C .• ~ c: -5 G <e <e t .p ,_ :--- - ,o CU ctS - 0 . <( en c -a u e e ~ ttl '::i g> ..•..• c:: ·- C Q) CL CL - ::I CU +::: V) CU > > - '::::: CL CL c,:s .CT' Q). <.I) ::J (L) >>-o cu roc:>U>m~C.9 ~

•

..

~;;:±~~~~'?(()&>&> ~ ~ktg.Rt5 ~g_~ ~ 33 ~ 0~ .., - -(1)0 ...., ••• 0 ::r ~ ••.. ,...._ ,.-. ~ -· 3 lO. - ~ (I) :r ~- :c ~ (I) :::r .!:: (I) I.fl "C - - • - •••• I.fl -c., < pi ::r - i I.fl (I)

- o.~ Q .......,.,. ~ -, 3

Q CO Ol .t,. N -'-1 p p O O S!: :::C: <OOOU1NU'I _,,_, (l)CD (1) u, . - -· ••••• I I I I I IO -,(0 _.. ....•. co Ol .t:. ' _.. 0 .•.••. CD :::r •. .i:,.···rv . 1.11- - 0 0 0 · tv <.n < -· 0 Ul 01 ;;f :,

< (!) VI

,:::m.t,.wrvrv_..._., ~.~o;,,:-::1: ;..,. J;:. ->- .t:. 00 N --..J -" , , :, -· (00111111 .,\,(.,.) 0:J 0 -.. Ol .i:,. W N N ..a. 0 ;..._ lif Q. -..wwow--..i.....,cr> -N .-.t.n w O" 1,-.. - L.-- - ,.-.. ..-... --..J - ;,::' "C C" 0 --..J 0) 0, .i:,. (.,.) I\.) I I 3 (I) Oci;O">WN_... ....•. o _,_O) ...,<I> < I I I I I I CD__. ~c.. (I) .•..•. --..J 0) U1 ,_, w __, - -· .._.. ....•. .i:,. ....•. o-o :, -J_._...._ (O._ ~ - -~ _ ~ CO Q;! --..J Ol U1 ~ ----· N .....,,_ 0 ~ D)

I • ..,,CD (.,.) - Cl ....•. Cb C: ....•. -

0 ;:i.

-I t'D '""I 3 ::::s 0 •••• 0 (0 '< C: (/) t'D a. ~ '""I

• •

}'

\ ~

~ OJ

I ¥1 I ~ I !w l~~I' I (!I • ~ • !I)

C: ·-i"> - "'--,T "'""·"'' ,r.1, ' --0-¥ 0 r,_,· (i;,:.r, :ff I ;ii a ;:.. 'ifr·' -EM{' -e.r-

m I . ,.T_ .ii

" "' , • • () •• ·,ti ;"nJ:S.:~ ·it,1. I ~ !l) - ·-- ---- -- ------·· (!I

~ .,._ ',,i; ~ ' -·- ,-'~· :,;,:;

~ I;\ ·~ Cl .., ·'JI' 0 . ·----· ··-·· --·- -· •

J =·· ~Z-~·'!JJ 3:ii!~I ~!vl ·:fl! I ~ ~ , __ ,...

~ a -il' • ;i ·,J - ., • • -~ i '" -~'·'. /0', 1\'~-1'. ?-:t.· f1&\ ·,,O'\ .\ ~~. lt'•: ~?" ·, .,'

-c'ttJ.r• • ·-n, Q.n., "" ~:r-' ,. {~ /:~·

i .;{:c ,.., iif ,t

0 " '5! ·~ g ~ & •• ,. E ,. ~ "m ]l ; ' li. C ~ • • • " ~ " • • u :.J" i if 1' i • 2 i 'Q_i;

~ '!l ·o o 1 !l ;;i • " '" ., • --;--" • , !I -· ' ; " • ? ' -

~

~ N

~·· 1 t ' ' ~ I ~ • ~ ~.

~); I .-1,,,, :trllit"il,C ··\.

r+ ;::;: 0 -·

Vl

;.

' 3 (D Q_

7' 0"" 3 :J. •.•••.•••• O'Q ::r

' '

•......• crj u ·- bl) 0

s O' ct::

'

-1 ~ ,---, ,---, ,---,

~ p >-< -· ...... ...... ••••• ::l ...... ...... '--' -· -· '--' ,-+ ,-+ < '--' ::r" ::r" ...... > ~ [/) '"d ,---, z st, (1) (1)

0 :-- < - a >-i 0 ~ - p (1) (1:) s· (1) ----- - 0 0 0 ::r" ......

[/) '"d "d :-, ::l p b:i q >-3 >-+, (1) (JQ g (1:) p -· ,-+ ,---, I ~ - 0 ::r" >-i -· 0- p -. p_. 0 .:! 0 ,-+ (1), (1:) I (1) --~ ,-+ -e ~::i -~ p --·---·~ - . . - --·a- ·1'-d

~ p 0 ~ p "'I (1) p_. 0- ::l b:i ::l ~ -,. >-i ::r" ::r" 0 [/) [/) (1:) "' ;:?.. (1) < [/) ~ o a (') 5· (6 0- (1) ::r"

~ "d (1) ~ ::l ::l (1) ~ 0 ...... C) (l) p (1:) [/) 0 "d ,-+ ::: "'I

>-i ~ I "d (1) (1) -· - -,. p_. "' ;:?.. >-i c::, (1) ,-+ >-i [/) 0 a [/) (') ••..•• (1) s "d ,-+ ~ 0 p_. ~ ,-+ ...... >-i 0 ..._ ::l • ::r" :=I: 0 "d (1:) [/) [/) ••••• (l) (1) "d p I ::r" :=I: o' p_. 0 < 0 (1)

[/) ,-+ p_. ::: c::, ::: - (l) p ::r" - "d ~ - 0 p_. ~

(l) p_. ::: < ,-+ ::l "d 0 ,-+ ..... 0- ,-+ -· ::r" ::l

(l) 0 ::l p ;:?.. p_. ,-+ (JQ ::r" p < I

(l) -· ,-+ [/) ::l 0 -· ::r" "d < 0 ::l (l) • • (l) < "d -· ::l p_. 0 (l) - ::l p_. I p_. -· p [/) p ::l p_. -· 0 ,-+ "d >-i 0 p_. I -· (JQ (1) [/) 0 (1) >-+, I 0 [/) "d ::l (1) < 0.. I w "d (l) [/) >-i 0 (l) -· (l)

I (l)

(l) s p_. 0 - ~ p_. >-+, ;:?.. a "d 0 w (l) • (l) >-i >-+, 0 p_. ----- ::r" >< 0 N 0 :-, 0 "d 00 § "d 0 (l)

~ (1) (1)

"' >-i • [/) " . p_. -· a p [/) 0 ....•

::l ----- -· . 0 -----

N p ::r" :::i-' ::l ,-+ :-, :-, 00 (1) [/)

,

C/) ;....; ;....; il) 00 p ,..c ,..c 1il N 0 ----- p . ,....; ----- . 1il ] 0 C/) . .,....; "O

0 H C/) t: il) il) ] 0 il) p_. 00 p_. u ;....; 0 N 0 :>< <2 "O 0 4-, H il) • I!) M 0 p_. ] 1il 4-, ,B "O - 0 I "O (1) I!) (1) •.-< (1) 0 H "O C/) I!)

~ p_. M I il) p p_. C/) 0 I 4-,

~

(1) 0 C/) I!) "O 0 ,p_. •.-< I u .•.... "O p "O C/) •••••• ro "O p .,....; u ,. - ~ (1) "O p •.-< p_. I!) ' (1) p 0 ~ p_. • ,..c / . ..... p

~ u ro (1) .C/) .•.... . ,....; ,B I

1il en

I!) "O ro p 0 p ,B •••••• .•.... .D ••••• 0 ~ p_.

"O p

~ .•.... ;::::l I!) ;;:;-- "O gs 0 - 1 ro I!) - ;::::l a - "O C/) c.8 I!) 0 I 1il 0 "O t:! ,..c p_. (1) (1) .,....; C/) C/) Q) p_. 0 t:!

~ s . p -.. 0 H .,....; ~ "O 0 i:::s ..•.... p_. s H (1) v C/)

0 I!) ~ ...... H .•.... "' "O C/) H .•.... p_. I ;::::l . ro .,....; (1) H .•..... - (1) C/) )... ;::::l .•.... p_. u C/) Q) ro I!)

~ 0 .,....; p ---- I!) p_.

I!) p '-3 ,..c ~ I!) 0 s 0 ;::s (1) .D H •.-< v i:::s C/) > ...., "' 0 C/) (1) ro

~

Q) C/)

,..c .§ H .._ p i::q p

.D I!) ;.._ ~ 0 ----0:J_ _t:; ro p_. 'S ~ ~ ---- (1) I 0 0 1il 'I!) .D .•.... ;:s 0 "O . ,_; ,B u i:::s .,....; I '--'. H - .•.... (1) E--, .,....; ro Q) ;::::l co 4-, ./:J .§ i::q ro p ;....; p_.

0 ~ C/) u .,....; ,..c 0 ~ - -----

il) Q) I!) ro ] - ~ 0 - ,..c H u <t'. z ·- p... I!) il) .•.... .____, C/)

•.-< .s ,..c > ,,,....._ +-' ,,,....._ .,....; ,,....; ,,,....._ . ,....; ..... p +-' :$ ,,....; ·~ . ,....;

~ - . co '--' '--' .__,

t--

'