Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

25
Applica’on of Muon Spin Rota’on to studies of cavity performance limita’ons Anna Grassellino University of Pennsylvania, TRIUMF

description

http://www.surfacetreatments.it/thinfilms Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations (Anna Grassellino - 20') Speaker: Anna Grassellino - TRIUMF - Vancouver, Canada | Duration: 20 min. Abstract In this contribution a new experiment to investigate magnetic flux entry in Nb coupons and HFQS limited cutout samples will be presented. The experimental technique, called muSR (muon spin rotation), utilizes a probe magnetic moment to reveal local magnetic fields in the sample under study. Through the use of low energy spin polarized muons, the experiment can probe near surface local magnetic fields with extreme sensitivity. Being a ‘local’ rather than external and global technique, it offers a different and precise way to measure the field of first penetration in type-II superconductors. The experiment will study the nature of the transition from superconducting to mixed state in the marginal type II superconductor Nb, for samples with different treatment and grain size, and for RF characterized (via thermometry) HFQS limited cutout samples. Studying the latest will provide an opportunity to look for correlation of the onset of HFQS with the appearance of flux entry into the sample, detectable via the extremely sensitive muSR probe. Models for HFQS and MFQS which muSR can help probing will be discussed.

Transcript of Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

Page 1: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

Applica'onofMuonSpinRota'ontostudiesofcavityperformancelimita'ons

AnnaGrassellinoUniversityofPennsylvania,TRIUMF

Page 2: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

Some of the most powerful tools available in condensed matter physics and materials science are instrumental methods that utilize a Magnetic Moment and/or Electric Quadrupole Moment to probe the local magnetic, electronic or structural properties of matter:

Conventional Methods

Intrinsic probe: Nuclei Electrons

Nuclear Beam Methods

Implanted probe: Muons Radioactive Nuclei

Page 3: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations
Page 4: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

1. Produce a non-equilibrium polarization

2. Monitor how the polarization evolves in time or changes with frequency

General Procedure:

Page 5: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

Pion Decay:

Conservation of Linear Momentum: µ+ emitted with momentum equal and opposite to that of the νµ

π+ → µ+ + νµ

Conservation of Angular Momentum: µ+ and the νµ have equal and opposite spin

A pion resting on the downstream side of the primary production target has zero linear momentum and zero angular momentum.

Weak Interaction: only “left-handed” νµ are created. Therefore the emerging µ+ has its spin pointing antiparallel to its momentum direction

Page 6: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

µ+-Decay Asymmetry

Angular distribution of positrons from the µ+-decay. The asymmetry is a = 1/3 when all positron energies are sampled with equal probability.

Page 7: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations
Page 8: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

The muon is sensitive to the vector sum of the local magnetic fields at its stopping site. The local fields consist of:

• those from nuclear magnetic moments • those from electronic moments (100-1000 times larger than from nuclear moments) • external magnetic fields

As a local probe, µSR can be used to deduce Magnetic volume fractions.

Page 9: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations
Page 10: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

•  greater sensitivity enables studies of dilute or isolated impurities

•  magnetism can be studied in zero external magnetic field

•  can study dynamical ranges not accessible with conventional methods

Major Advantages of and

• can be implanted into any sample (gas, solid or liquid)

•  polarization independent of sample and sample environment

10-4 10-2 100 102 104 106 108 1010 1012 1014

Fluctuation Rate (Hz)

Page 11: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

Conventional Methods

Probe: host nuclei host electrons muons radioactive nuclei

Lifetime: infinite infinite 2.2 µs 100 ms - hours

Polarization Method: apply large apply large natural optical field field pumping

Polarization (max.): << 1 % << 1 % 100 % 80 %

Detection: absorbed absorbed anisotropic anisotropic RF radiation microwave decay of decay of radiation muon nucleus

Sensitivity: 1017 spins 1017 spins 107 spins 107 spins

Nuclear Beam Methods

Page 12: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

Transverse-Field µSR

The time evolution of the muon spin polarization is described by:

where G(t) is a relaxation function describing the envelope of the TF-µSR signal that is sensitive to the width of the static field distribution or temporal fluctuations.

Page 13: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

•  “Local”extremelysensi'vemagne'cfieldprobe(vsmagne'za'onetc)

•  Canimplantatdifferentdepths:canstudysurfacevsbulk

•  Canbeusedtostudythinfilms,surfacesandmul'‐layeredcompounds

•  Cananswerseveralques'ons:1.  IsHFQSduetoearlyfluxpenetra7on?2.  RoleoftrappedfluxonHFQSand/orMFQS?3.  Fielddependenceofpenetra7ondepthand

coherencelength?4. Magne7cimpuri7es?

for Q-slope studies and

Page 14: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

HFQS:earlyfluxpenetra'on?

•  MeasureHp,Hc2,Tc

•  Vibra'ngsamplemagnetometerand3experimentalprotocols(ZFCwarming,FCC,FCW)

•  Samples:S1(pris'neasreceivedbyvendor),S2(BCP+10h600C),S3(S2plus10h120C)

Roy,MynenietSahni,Supercond.Sci.Technol.22(2009)105014(6pp)

Page 15: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

HFQS:earlyfluxpenetra'on?

[ARomanenkoandHPadamsee2010Supercond.Sci.Technol.23045008]

Decreaseinaveragedisloca'ondensityobservedbyEBSDincutoutsamplesafer120Cbaking(whichremovestheHFQSincavi'es)

Workinghypothesis–surfacedisloca'onsprovidesitesforearlyfluxpenetra'on(belowbulkHc1)resul'ngintheHFQSduetofluxoidmo'oninNb

Beforebaking Aferbaking

Page 16: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

16

HFQS:earlyfluxpenetra'on?

RFSide

OuterSide

Page 17: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

HFQSandMFQS:trappedflux?

•  Oscilla'ngfluxoidscancauselossesinmediumandhighfieldregimes(Gurevich,Rabinowitz)

•  LookwithmuSRforcorrela'onhot/coldspotswithhigher/lowertrappedflux Ciova',Gurevich–Evidenceofhighfield

radiofrequencyhotspotsduetotrappedvor'cesinNbcavi'es,PRSTAB,11,122001,2008

Page 18: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

Descrip'onoftheexperiment•  Measurefieldoffirstpenetra'oninRFcharacterized(via

thermometry)HFQSlimitedsamples,andcomparewithHFQSRFfieldonset:–  Hotvscold–  Unbakedvsbaked

•  Studythenatureofthetransi'on:intermediatemixedstate?Anycorrela'onbetweenIMSandhotspots?

•  Trappedflux(hot/cold,baked/unbaked):zerofieldmuSR•  Fieldrange0‐200mT,Temperaturerange1K‐4.2K•  5samples:

–  Pris'neNb–fromvendor–  Hot/coldspotcutoutfromlargegraincavity(beforeandaferbake)–

providedbyAlexanderRomanenko,HasanPadamsee(Cornell)•  Beam'meapproved:~1daypersample12shifs,star'ngOct

27th

Page 19: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

MFQS,HFQS:fielddependenceoffundamentalsuperconduc'ngparameters?

•  Fielddependenceofpenetra'ondepthandcoherencelength?

•  Determinedbygapstructure:doublegapinNb?•  StudyvortexcoresizewithmuSR

Page 20: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

50

100

150

200

! ab

)

NbSe2

H/Hc2

T = 0.02 K T = 2.5 K T = 4.2 K

0 5 10 15 20 250

20

40

60

80

100

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

! e /

! n

" ab

)

H (kOe)

Freeze out thermal excitations of quasiparticle core states to reveal multiband vortices.

Page 21: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

“Effec've”Magne'cPenetra'onDepth:Magne'cFieldDependence

0.0 0.1 0.2500

1000

1500

2000

LuNi2B

2C

V3Si

YBa2Cu

3O

6.95

! ab

)

H/Hc2

NbSe2 • V3Si fully gapped

• LuNi2B2C anisotropic gap

• YBa2Cu3O6.95 dx2

-y2-wave gap

• NbSe2 multiband

Page 22: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

PureVanadium(marginaltype‐II)

Laulajainen, Callaghan, Kaiser & Sonier PRB 74, 054511 (2006)

Page 23: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

Impactonlow,mediumandhighfieldQ‐slope

•  Fielddependenceofpenetra'ondepth

•  Fielddependentlossesduetoincreasedvolumewheredissipa'onoccurs

Rs ∼ (µ02ω2λ3σnΔ/T)exp(-Δ/T)

H(t)E(z,t)

Rs ∝µ02ω 2λ4Δn0kBTpF

ln Δω

+ C0

exp −

ΔkBT

Ermolov, Marchenko, Chizov, 1986

λ(H)

Page 24: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

Impactonlow,mediumandhighfieldQ‐slope

•  Fielddependenceofcoherencelengthcancause‘gain’(sta'onarytrappedflux)

•  Sumofgain(coherencelength)andlosses(penetra'ondepth)couldexplainalsolowfieldQ‐slope

Page 25: Grassellino - Application of Muon Spin Rotation to studies of cavity performance limitations

Descrip'onofthesecondexperiment

•  Determinethefielddependenceoftheeffec'vepenetra'ondepth(andvortexcoresize)inthevortexandintermediatemixedstates.Willdothisatseveraltemperaturestoinves'gatethepossibilityoftwoSCgaps.

•  TakeadvantageofmuSRuniquesofwareformeasurementsofthevortexlarceinamarginaltype‐II

•  TF‐muSR,dilu'onrefrigerator•  Pris'nesinglecrystalsample•  Beam'meapproved:12shifs