Golden Growth
description
Transcript of Golden Growth
![Page 1: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Golden GrowthRestoring the Lustre of the European Economic Model
Zagreb, June 4-5, 2012
![Page 2: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
The European Economic Model
Trade
Finance
Enterprise
Innovation
Labor
Government
![Page 3: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
The achievements
Trade
Finance
Enterprise
Innovation
Labor
Government
Convergence Machine
Brand Europe
Lifestyle Superpower
![Page 4: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Europe—“Convergence Machine”
![Page 5: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
The convergence machine
Figure 1: In Europe, a rapid convergence in living standards—not much elsewhere(annual growth of consumption per capita between 1970 and 2009, by level of consumption in 1970)
Note: n = number of countries. *** statistical significance at the 1 percent.Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on Penn World Table 7.0 (Heston, Summers, and Aten 2011); see Chapter 1.
Corr. = -0.80***n = 26
-2
0
2
4
6
8
0 3 6 9 12 15
Europe
Corr. = -0.21n = 15
0 3 6 9 12 15
East Asia
Corr. = -0.25n = 22
0 3 6 9 12 15
Latin America
Ann
ual p
er c
apita
con
sum
ptio
n gr
owth
1970
-200
9, p
erce
nt
Initial level of consumption per capita, 1970PPP, thousands of 2005 international dollars
![Page 6: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Trade (goods)
Figure 2: Almost half of the global goods trade involves Europe(merchandise trade in 2008, US$ billion)
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on WTO (2009); see Chapter 2.
![Page 7: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Trade (services)
Figure 2.19: India and the United States have more sophisticated services exports than the European Union
(Service EXPY, 1990–2007 (left), and shares in service EXPY, 2007 (right))
Source: Lundstrom Gable and Mishra (2011); see Chapter 2.
![Page 8: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
New members’ trade has become more diversified
Figure 2.3: The European Union’s new members are more important partners for the EU15, the EU15 less for the new
(shares of regional trade for EU15 and EU10, 1996–2008)
Note: The EU10 includes new member states joined the EU in 2004. Source World Bank staff calculations, based on UN Comtrade; see Chapter 2.
![Page 9: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Trade shares with the EU15 have declined
Figure 2.3: The European Union’s new members are more important partners for the EU15, the EU15 less for the new
(shares of trade with EU15 for Croatia, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Romania, 1995–2010)
Source World Bank staff calculations, based on UN Comtrade; see Chapter 2.
40
50
60
70
1995 2000 2005 2010 1995 2000 2005 2010 1995 2000 2005 2010 1995 2000 2005 2010
Croatia Slovenia Bulgaria Romania
All products: Exports Imports
![Page 10: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Factory Europe has become brainier
Figure 2.9: Advanced and emerging Europe are trading more sophisticated intermediate goods(EXPY for intermediate goods, thousands of US$, 1996–2008)
Note: Trade in intermediates is defined by the BEC nomenclature.Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on UN Comtrade, and WDI; see Chapter 2.
14.0
14.5
15.0
15.5
16.0
16.5
17.0
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Exports Imports
EU10 with EU15 World World with EU15Trade in intermediate goods of:
![Page 11: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Intermediates trade of Croatia and new EU entrants becomes more sophisticated
Figure 2.9: Advanced and emerging Europe are trading more sophisticated intermediate goods(EXPY for intermediate goods trade with the EU15, thousands of US$, 1996–2008)
Note: Trade in intermediates is defined by the BEC nomenclature. EXPY for trade with the rest of the world follows the similar pattern.Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on UN Comtrade, and WDI; see Chapter 2.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1996 2000 2004 2008 1996 2000 2004 2008 1996 2000 2004 2008 1996 2000 2004 2008
Croatia Slovenia Bulgaria Romania
Trade in intermediate goods: Exports Imports
![Page 12: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Financial integration
Figure 3.2: Capital flows in emerging Europe are particularly large(percentage of GDP; period average of group median values)
Note: “EU coh.” refers to the EU cohesion countries, “EU cand.” refers to EU candidate countries, “E. prtn.” refers to EU eastern partnership countries, “LAC” refers to the Latin America and the Caribbean region. CA stands for current account and FX is foreign exchange.
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on IMF WEO; see Chapter 3.
![Page 13: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Sharper increase in FDI and other capital inflows
Figure 3.2: Capital flows in emerging Europe are particularly large(percentage of GDP; period average values for Croatia, Slovenia, Bulgaria, and Romania)
Note: CA stands for current account and FX is foreign exchange.Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on IMF WEO; see Chapter 3.
-20-15-10-505
101520253035
Croatia Slovenia Bulgaria Romania Croatia Slovenia Bulgaria Romania
2001-2004 2005-2008
FDI Portfolio Other Total capital flows CA balance FX reserves, change
![Page 14: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Financial flows have helped in emerging Europe
Figure 4: In Europe, foreign capital has boosted growth in emerging economies(current account deficits and annual per capita growth, 1997–2008, by groups of countries, percent)
Note: Average growth rates calculated using 3 four-year periods in 1997-2008.Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on IMF WEO; see Chapter 3.
![Page 15: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
More equity flows to the east, more debt in the south
Figure 3.14: Greater debt exposure in Southern Europe, more equity exposure in the east(aggregate external net equity and net debt exposures, percentage of GDP, 2002–09)
Note: Arrows begin in 2002 and end in 2009. The arrows for each region are median values. The dot is the median value for the referenced group. Ireland is excluded from net debt position as its data are distorted because international mutual funds hosted by Ireland are recorded as positive net debt, even though these resources are not related to the domestic economy.
Source: Updated and extended version of dataset constructed by Lane and Milesi-Ferretti (2007); see Chapter 3.
EU12
EU candidates
Eastern partnership
EU cohesion
Croatia
Slovenia
Bulgaria
RomaniaAsia (2009)
LAC (2009)
-10
-20
-30
-40
-60
-80-100
Net
equ
ity p
ositi
on, 2
002-
09
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40Net debt position, 2002-09
![Page 16: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Needed: real integration
Box figure 1: More monetary and financial than real integration in Europe during the last decade(arrows begin in 1997 and end in 2008; the origin indicates complete nominal and real integration)
Note: The figure shows the extent of economic integration. The vertical axis combines in one index of dissimilarity three indicators of nominal integration—volatility of exchange rates, convergence in inflation rates, and convergence in interest rates. The horizontal axis does the same with three indicators of real integration—extent of synchronization in business cycles measured by indexes of industrial production, trade integration, and per capita income. Bulgaria is not shown since the data at the starting point is not available.
Source: Sugawara and Zalduendo (2010).
EU12
EU candidates
Eastern partnership
CroatiaSlovenia
Romania
EU15
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Nom
inal
inte
grat
ion
(0 =
full
inte
grat
ion)
0 1 2 3 4Real integration (0 = full integration)
![Page 17: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
European workers are less mobile
Figure 15: Europeans are less mobile, even within their own countries(labor mobility, share of working-age population that has moved, 2000-05)
Source: Bonin and others (2008); and OECD (2005 and 2007); see Chapter 6.
![Page 18: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
European Convergence
See Spotlight One.
![Page 19: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
“Europe”—Global Brand
![Page 20: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
The making of “Brand Europe”
Table 1: Relentless growth in the United States, revival in Asia, and a postwar miracle in Europe(average annual compound growth rates, GDP per capita, 1820–2008, US$ 1990 Geary-Khamis PPP
estimates)
Note: Regional aggregates are population weighted; see Spotlight One for details.Source: Maddison (1996); and Conference Board (2011).
![Page 21: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
The making of “Brand Europe”
Figure 5: European enterprises have delivered jobs, productivity, and exports(performance of European sub-regions and benchmark countries, 1995–2009)
Note: Growth rates in employment and productivity are compound annual growth rates. Average values by group are shown. China and Japan, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Romania, and Croatia are also included in the calculation of the corresponding regional averages.
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on WDI and ILO (2010); see Chapter 4.
1.3
1.3
0.4
0.9
-0.1
-1.3
0.6
-0.0
-0.1
1.2
-0.1
1.0
1.7
2.4
1.4
1.0
3.0
3.5
2.5
3.4
3.6
2.8
6.6
1.6
1.2
7.8
2.0
0.4
50.2
49.4
57.5
58.2
47.9
31.3
31.2
35.7
38.7
11.2
13.4
26.7
64.0
23.2
EFTA
EU15
EU12
Slovenia
Bulgaria
Romania
EU candidates
Croatia
Eastern partnership
United States
Japan
China
East Asia
Latin America
-1 0 1 2 0 2 4 6 8 0 20 40 60
Employment growth, percent Productivity growth, percent Exports, percentage of GDP, 2009
![Page 22: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Two productivity gapsNorth vs. South, and EU vs. US
Figure 5.1: Mind the gap: convergence followed by slowdown in Europe’s productivity relative to the United States
(GDP per hours worked in Geary/Khamis $, United States =100)
Note: EU15 North = Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom; EU15 Continental = Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, and the Netherlands; EU15 South = Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain.
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on Conference Board (2011); see Chapter 5.
![Page 23: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Productivity levels differ in Europe—as expected
Figure 6a: Much of Europe is becoming more productive, but the south has fallen behind(labor productivity levels in 2002, thousands of 2005 US$)
Note: For Belgium, Greece, and Norway, productivity levels refer to 2003. The three lines show average values for countries covered by each line.Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on Eurostat; see Chapter 4.
![Page 24: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Productivity growth—not exactly what was expected
Figure 6b: Much of Europe is becoming more productive, but the south has fallen behind(labor productivity growth, 2002–08, annual percentage increase)
Note: The period considered varies: Belgium and Norway (2003–08), Greece (2003–07), and the Czech Republic, France, Latvia, Romania, and the United Kingdom (2002–07). The three lines show average values for countries covered by each line. Expected growth for EU15 South is obtained by computing gaps in productivity levels between EU15 South and each of the other two groups and then applying these shares to the difference in growth between the first (that is., EFTA, EU15 North, and EU15 Continental) and the third (EU12) groups.
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on Eurostat; see Chapter 4.
![Page 25: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Entrepreneurial structures must be suitable for a big market
Figure 7: Smaller firms contribute half of value added in the EU15 South, but just a third elsewhere(contributions to value added by size of enterprises, 2009)
Note: The numbers in parentheses are the total value added expressed in billions of constant 2005 U.S. dollars. The EU15 comprises Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (North); Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, and the Netherlands (Continental); and Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain (South). The EU12 comprises Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania (North); the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, the Slovak Republic, and Slovenia (Continental); and Bulgaria and Romania (South).
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on Eurostat; see Chapter 4.
![Page 26: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
FDI has turned eastward, away from the south
Figure 8: Western European investors have been looking east, not south(foreign direct investment inflows in Europe, percent, 1985, 1995, 2005 and 2008, percent)
Note: The numbers in parentheses are the amount of inflows expressed in billions of U.S. dollars.Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on UNCTAD (2010); see Chapter 4.
![Page 27: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Doing business is now most difficult in the EU15 South
Figure 9: Southern and Eastern Europe must make it easier to do business(principal components index of the ease of doing business in 2011, scaled from 0 [poor] to 100
[excellent])
Note: Averages are computed using principal component analysis. EFTA here comprises Iceland, Norway, and Switzerland. The EU15 comprises Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (North); Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands (Continental); and Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain (South). The EU12 comprises Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania (North); the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, the Slovak Republic, and Slovenia (Continental); and Bulgaria, Cyprus, and Romania (South).
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on Doing Business; see Chapter 4.
90.7
82.879.5
76.0
87.2
74.4
64.469.4
74.568.0 65.7 66.5 68.9
61.657.4
0
30
60
90
USA JPN EFTA EU15 North Conti-nental
South EU12 North Conti-nental
SVN South BGR ROM HRV
![Page 28: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Another productivity gap has been growing—between the EU15 and the US
Figure 10: Productivity growth in Europe’s larger economies has slowed down since the mid-1990s
(EU15 labor productivity, indexed to the United States and Japan)
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on the OECD Productivity Database; see Chapter 5.
![Page 29: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Europe specializes in old sectors, the US in new
Figure 11: The United States specializes in younger, more R&D-intensive products(relative technological advantage and R&D efforts by young and old innovation leaders in the United
States, Europe and the rest of the world)
Note: R&D intensity is measured as the ratio of R&D spending to total sales, for firms established after 1975 (young leading innovators or “Yollies”) or before 1975 (“Ollies”). The relative technological advantage is calculated as the share of each region or country (say Europe) in the R&D of a particular sector (say the Internet) relative to the share of Europe in world R&D; values greater than 1 indicate the region is technology specialized in the sector.
Source: Bruegel and World Bank staff calculations, based on the European Commission’s Institute for Prospective Technological Studies R&D Scoreboard; see Chapter 5.
![Page 30: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Some economies are doing well, but they are small
Figure 5.3: Europe’s leaders invest as much in innovation as the United States and Japan(business and public R&D expenditure, percentage of GDP)
Note: Data refer to different years by country.Source: European Commission (2011b) and UNESCO; see Chapter 5.
![Page 31: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
And the US lead in top tertiary education is growing
Figure 5.16: Europe is falling behind the United States in top university rankings(world’s top 100 universities)
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on data from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Thomson Reuters/Times; see Chapter 5.
![Page 32: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Europe—Lifestyle Superpower
![Page 33: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
The lifestyle superpower
Figure 12: Outspending the rest of the world(general government spending on defense [United States] and social protection [Europe], 2004–09,
share of total world spending)
Note: For social protection spending, due to the data availability, averages over 2004–09 by country are used. n is the number of countries included in the calculations. Data cover general government but, if unavailable, refer to central government only.
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (2011), IMF GFS, WDI, World Bank ECA Social Protection Database, and Weigand and Grosh (2008).
UnitedStates43%Rest of
the world57%
Military (n=124)2010
Europe(n=36)58%
Rest ofthe world
42%
Social protection (n=96)2004-09
Government expenditurepercentage of world total
![Page 34: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Fewer workers in Europe
Figure 14: Europe’s labor force will shrink, while North America’s will grow by a quarter(projected cumulative change in working-age population, 2010–50, percent)
Note: North America is the US and Canada; North-East Asia includes China, Hong Kong SAR, China, Japan, Macao SAR, China, Republic of Korea, and Taiwan, China. Croatia, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Romania are also included in Emerging Europe.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Data Base; see Chapter 6.
North America
North-East Asia
Western EuropeEmerging Europe
Slovenia
Bulgaria
RomaniaCroatia
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Wor
king
-age
pop
ulat
ion,
201
0=0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
![Page 35: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Europeans are living longer, and retiring earlier
Figure 13: Europe’s pension systems have to support people for many more years(changes in life expectancy at 60 and effective retirement age, 1965–2007)
Source: OECD (2011) and updated data from OECD (2006).
![Page 36: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
European governments spend about 10 percent of GDP more
Figure 16: Governments in Europe are big(the world resized by government spending in dollars, 2009)
Source: World Bank staff using IMF WEO.
![Page 37: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Social protection spending is the (only) reason
Figure 17: Social protection explains the difference in government size between Europe and its peers
(government spending, percentage of GDP, 2007–08)
Note: “Social protection” includes benefits related to sickness and disability, old age, survivors, family and children, unemployment, and housing. Western Europe comprises Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden (North); Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom (Center); Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain (South).
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on IMF GFS and IMF WEO; see Chapter 7.
![Page 38: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Croatia is as big as EU12 countries, but smaller than the west
Figure 17: Social protection explains the difference in government size between Europe and its peers
(government spending, percentage of GDP, 2007–08)
Note: “Social protection” includes benefits related to sickness and disability, old age, survivors, family and children, unemployment, and housing. Data for Croatia are not for 2007-08 but for different periods, which are taken from Selected Indicators in the report.
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on IMF GFS and IMF WEO; see Chapter 7.
17.6
6.6
4.6
13.7
18.8
6.6
4.5
16.9
17.1
2.53.4
8.0
15.4
5.9
6.3
15.7
17.6
3.74.2
10.7
16.1
4.33.8
11.3
16.7
6.8
6.7
21.1
18.3
7.0
4.6
18.5
13.6
6.2
4.0
19.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
Croatia Serbia Albania Slovenia Romania Bulgaria Sweden Italy Germany
Social protection Education Health Non-social spending
![Page 39: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Others also subsidize the elderly, but not for nearly as long
Figure 18: Small differences in annual pensions per beneficiary, big in overall public pension spending
(public pension spending in 2007)
Note: Median values by group are shown. Western Europe comprises Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden (North); Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom (Center); Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain (South). Anglo-Saxon comprises Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States.
Source: World Bank staff calculations, based on Eurostat and the OECD Pensions Statistics; see Chapter 7.
![Page 40: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Big adjustments ahead, because of current imbalances and future health costs
Figure 19: Western Europe has to reduce fiscal deficits by 6 percent of GDP, emerging Europe by less
(illustrative fiscal adjustment needs, 2010–30, percentage of GDP)
Note: The fiscal impacts of aging on pensions and health care systems are missing for EU candidate and eastern partnership countries. For this exercise, the sum of adjustment in health care spending is assumed to be the same as for the new member states. The adjustment in pension related spending is assumed to be the same as that for southern Europe. For the country composition in each group, see note for figure 17.
Sources: Calculations by staff of the Institute for Structural Research in Poland and the World Bank, based on IMF WEO; see Chapter 7.
![Page 41: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Imperatives
![Page 42: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Towards a greener economic model
See Spotlight Two.
![Page 43: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Keeping what has been achieved
• Restarting the Convergence Machine: Services• Facilitate the trade in business services• Strengthen regulatory coordination for finance
• Rebuilding Brand Europe: Productivity• Restart the convergence machine• Improve enterprise where productivity growth has slowed• Download “killer apps” of innovation from the United States
• Remaining the Lifestyle Superpower: Demography• Restart the Convergence Machine• Rebuild Brand Europe• Make labor markets more competitive• Make government more efficient, or make it smaller
![Page 44: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Imperatives, strengths and weaknesses
Government
Labor
Innovation
Enterprise
Finance
Trade
Demographic Trends
Productivity Growth
Modern Services
![Page 45: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
It’s been done before (in Europe)
Table 8.1: Benchmark countries for selected policies
Source: Iwulska (2011), available at www.worldbank.org/goldengrowth.
Policy areaSelected countries
Europe World
1 Restructuring private debt Sweden Korea, Rep.
2 Managing financial foreign direct investment (EU) Poland (Non-EU) Croatia
3 Crisis-proofing financial integration Czech Republic Canada
4 Increasing value-added Slovak Republic Singapore
5 Job creation Ireland New Zealand
6 Export generation Germany Korea, Rep.
7 R&D policy Switzerland United States
8 Tertiary education United Kingdom United States
9 Management quality Sweden United States
10 Internal mobility Ireland United States
11 Labor legislation Denmark United States
12 Immigration policies Sweden; United Kingdom Canada; United States
13 Social security Iceland Japan
14 Social service delivery Finland Singapore
15 Reducing public debt Turkey New Zealand
16 Green growth policies Germany California (US)
![Page 46: Golden Growth](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051518/56816024550346895dcf2b9b/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Available atwww.worldbank.org/goldengrowth