Generalized Functions for the Fractional Calculus€¦ · Generalized Functions for the Fractional...

24
NASA/TP—1999-209424/REV1 October 1999 Carl F. Lorenzo Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Tom T. Hartley The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio Generalized Functions for the Fractional Calculus

Transcript of Generalized Functions for the Fractional Calculus€¦ · Generalized Functions for the Fractional...

NASA/TP—1999-209424/REV1

October 1999

Carl F. LorenzoGlenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Tom T. HartleyThe University of Akron, Akron, Ohio

Generalized Functions for theFractional Calculus

The NASA STI Program Office . . . in Profile

Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated tothe advancement of aeronautics and spacescience. The NASA Scientific and TechnicalInformation (STI) Program Office plays a key partin helping NASA maintain this important role.

The NASA STI Program Office is operated byLangley Research Center, the Lead Center forNASA’s scientific and technical information. TheNASA STI Program Office provides access to theNASA STI Database, the largest collection ofaeronautical and space science STI in the world.The Program Office is also NASA’s institutionalmechanism for disseminating the results of itsresearch and development activities. These resultsare published by NASA in the NASA STI ReportSeries, which includes the following report types:

• TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports ofcompleted research or a major significantphase of research that present the results ofNASA programs and include extensive dataor theoretical analysis. Includes compilationsof significant scientific and technical data andinformation deemed to be of continuingreference value. NASA’s counterpart of peer-reviewed formal professional papers buthas less stringent limitations on manuscriptlength and extent of graphic presentations.

• TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientificand technical findings that are preliminary orof specialized interest, e.g., quick releasereports, working papers, and bibliographiesthat contain minimal annotation. Does notcontain extensive analysis.

• CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific andtechnical findings by NASA-sponsoredcontractors and grantees.

• CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collectedpapers from scientific and technicalconferences, symposia, seminars, or othermeetings sponsored or cosponsored byNASA.

• SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific,technical, or historical information fromNASA programs, projects, and missions,often concerned with subjects havingsubstantial public interest.

• TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English-language translations of foreign scientificand technical material pertinent to NASA’smission.

Specialized services that complement the STIProgram Office’s diverse offerings includecreating custom thesauri, building customizeddata bases, organizing and publishing researchresults . . . even providing videos.

For more information about the NASA STIProgram Office, see the following:

• Access the NASA STI Program Home Pageat http://www.sti.nasa.gov

• E-mail your question via the Internet [email protected]

• Fax your question to the NASA AccessHelp Desk at (301) 621-0134

• Telephone the NASA Access Help Desk at(301) 621-0390

• Write to: NASA Access Help Desk NASA Center for AeroSpace Information 7121 Standard Drive Hanover, MD 21076

Carl F. LorenzoGlenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Tom T. HartleyThe University of Akron, Akron, Ohio

Generalized Functions for theFractional Calculus

NASA/TP—1999-209424/REV1

October 1999

National Aeronautics andSpace Administration

Glenn Research Center

Available from

NASA Center for Aerospace Information7121 Standard DriveHanover, MD 21076Price Code: A03

National Technical Information Service5285 Port Royal RoadSpringfield, VA 22100

Price Code: A03

NASA/TP—1999-209424 1

Generalized Functions for the Fractional Calculus

Carl F. LorenzoNational Aeronautics and Space Administration

Glenn Research CenterCleveland, Ohio 44135

Tom T. HartleyThe University of Akron

Department of Electrical EngineeringAkron, Ohio 44325–3904

Introduction Previous papers have used two important functions for the solution of fractional order

differential equations, the Mittag-Leffler function [ ]qq atE (1903a, 1903b, 1905), and the

F-function [ ]F a tq , of Hartley & Lorenzo (1998). These functions provided direct solution and

important understanding for the fundamental linear fractional order differential equation and forthe related initial value problem (Hartley and Lorenzo, 1999). This paper examines related functions and their Laplace transforms. Presented forconsideration are two generalized functions, the R -function and the G -function, useful inanalysis and as a basis for computation in the fractional calculus. The R -function is unique inthat it contains all of the derivatives and integrals of the F-function. The R -function also returnsitself on qth order differ-integration. An example application of the R -function is provided. Afurther generalization of the R -function, called the G -function brings in the effects of repeatedand partially repeated fractional poles.

Functions for the Fractional Calculus This section summarizes a number of functions that have been found useful in the solutionof problems of the fractional calculus and more particularly in the solution of fractionaldifferential equations.

Mittag-Leffler FunctionThe Mittag-Leffler (1903, 1903, 1905) function is given by the following equation

[ ] ( ) ( )1.0,10

>+Γ

=∑∞

=

qnq

ttE

n

n

q

This function will often appear with the argument −at q , its Laplace transform then, is given as

[ ]{ } ( )( ) ( ) ( )2.0

10

>+

=

+Γ−=− ∑

=

qass

s

nq

taLatEL

q

q

n

nqnq

q

2

Agarwal’s FunctionThe Mittag-Leffler function is generalized by Agarwal (1953) as follows

( ) ( ) ( )∑∞

=

+

+Γ=

0

1

, 3.m

m

m

ttE

βα

αβ

βα

This function is particularly interesting to the fractional order system theory due to its Laplacetransform, given by Agarwal as

[ ]{ } ( )4.1, −

=−

α

βαα

βα s

stEL

This function is the ( )α β− order fractional derivative of the F-function, (of Robotnov (1969)

and Hartley (1998)), with argument a =1, to be presented later.

Erdelyi’s FunctionErdelyi (1954) has studied the following related generalization of the Mittag-Leffler function

( ) ( ) ( )5,0,,0

, >+Γ

=∑∞

=

βαβαβα

m

m

m

ttE

where the powers of t are integer. The Laplace transform of this function is given by

( ){ } ( )( ) ( )6.0,

1

01, >

+Γ+Γ=∑

=+ βα

βαβαm

msm

mtEL

As this function cannot be easily generalized it will not be considered further.

Robotnov and Hartley’s FunctionTo effect the direct solution of the fundamental linear fractional order differential equation

the following function was introduced (Hartley and Lorenzo, 1998)

[ ] ( )( ) ( )7.0,

0

1 >+Γ

−=− ∑∞

=

− qqnq

tattaF

n

nqnq

q

This function had been studied earlier by Robotnov (1969, 1980) with respect to hereditaryintegrals for application to solid mechanics. The important feature of this function is the powerand simplicity of its Laplace transform, namely

[ ]{ } ( )8.0,1

, >−

= qas

taFLqq

Miller and Ross’ FunctionMiller and Ross (1993, pp.80 and 309-351) introduce another function as the basis of the

solution of the fractional order initial value problem. It is defined as the v th integral of theexponential function, that is

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )9,

1,,

0∑∞

=

∗−

++Γ===

k

kvatvat

v

v

t kv

attatvete

dt

davE γ

NASA/TP—1999-209424

3

where ( )γ ∗ v at, is the incomplete gamma function. The Laplace transform of equation (9)follows directly as

( ){ } ( ) ( )10.1Re, >−

=−

vas

savEL

v

t

Miller and Ross then show that

( ) ( )11,...,3

1,

2

1,1

1,...3,2,1,

1,1

1

1 ===−

=

−∑=

qvq

asajvEaL

v

qq

jt

j

which is a special case of the F-function of Robotnov and Hartley.

The above functions are studied in considerable detail by their originators and others. Theinterested reader is directed to the supplied references.

A Generalized Function It is of significant usefulness to develop a generalized function which when fractionallydifferintegrated (by any order) returns itself. Such a function would greatly ease the analysisof fractional order differential equations. To this end the following is proposed, considerthe function

[ ] ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )12.1

,,0

11

, ∑∞

=

−−+

−+Γ−≡

n

vqnn

vq vqn

ctatcaR

Our interest in this function will normally be for the solution of fractional differential equationsfor the range of .0=> ct For Rct ,< will be complex except for the cases when the exponent

( )( )vqn −−+ 11 is integer. The more compact notation

[ ] ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )13,1

,0

11

, ∑∞

=

−−+

−+Γ−=−

n

vqnn

vq vqn

ctactaR

is also useful, particularly when c = 0.The Laplace transform of the R -function is

[ ]{ } ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )14.11

,,0

11

0

11

, ∑∑∞

=

−−+∞

=

−−+

−+Γ−=

−+Γ−=

n

vqnn

n

vqnn

vq vqn

ctLa

vqn

ctaLtcaRL

Consider first the case for c = 0, then we have

[ ]{ } ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )15.1

,0,0

11

, ∑∞

=

−−+

−+Γ=

n

vqnn

vq vqn

tLataRL

Now from (Erdelyi et al, 1954)

{ } ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )16.0Re,1Re1 1 >−>+Γ= −− svsvtL vv

Then equation 15 becomes

[ ]{ } ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )17.0Re,01Re1

,0,0

1, ∑∞

=−+ >>−+=

nvqn

nvq svqn

sataRL

NASA/TP—1999-209424

NASA/TP—1999-209424 4

[ ]{ } ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )18.0Re,01Re

1,0,

01, ∑

=+− >>−+=

nqn

n

vvq svqns

a

staRL

This can be written as a geometric series that converges when .1<qsa It can be shown, by

long division, that

( ){ } ( ) ( ) ( )19.0sRe,0Re,,0,, >>−−

= vqas

staRL

q

v

vq

Now for c ≠ 0the shifting theorem for the Laplace transform (Wylie p. 281) is

( ) ( ){ } ( ){ } ( )20,0≥=−− − btfLebtubtfL bs

where the unit step function ( )u t b− effectively causes ( )f t b− = 0for t b< . Under the

assumption that [ ] 0,,, =tcaR vq for t c< , this theorem and the result (equation 19) are applied

to yield

( ){ } ( )( ) ( )21.0Re,01Re,0,,, >>−+≥−

=−

svqncas

setcaRL

q

vcs

vq

Table 1, in a later section, presents a summary of the defining series and respective Laplacetransforms for the functions discussed in this paper.

Properties of the Rq,v(a,c,t)FunctionThe general time domain character of the R -function is shown in figures 1, 2, and 3. Figure 1shows the effect of variations in q with 0=v and .1±=a The exponential character of the

function is readily observed (see, q =1). Figure 2 shows the effect of v on the behavior of the

R -function. The effect of the characteristic time a is shown in figure 3. The characteristic time is

1/ aq . For q a=1 1, / is the time constant, when q = 2 we have the natural frequency, when qtakes on other values we have the generalized characteristic time (or generalized time constant).

Figure 1b. Effect of q on ( ),,0,10, tRq −0.1,0.0 −== av

Figure 1a. Effect of q on ( ),,0,10, tRq0.1,0.0 == av

5

( )tRv v ,0,1on ,25.0 −0.1,25.0 −== aq

Figure 2b. Effect of ( )tRv v ,0,1on ,50.0 −0.1,50.0 −== aq

Figure 2c. Effect of ( )tRv v ,0,1on ,75.0 −0.1,75.0 −== aq

Figure 2a. Effect of

Figure 2d. Effect of ( )tRv v ,0,1on ,00.1 −0.1,00.1 −== aq

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

t

R-F

unctionR(0.25,v,-1,0,t)

v= -0.45

v= 0.15

v= -0.45 to v= 0.15 in steps of 0.15

a= -1.0, q=0.25

v=0.00

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

t

R-F

unctionR(0.50,v,-1,0,t)

v= -0.45

v= 0.45

v= -0.45 to v= 0.45 in steps of 0.15

a= -1.0, q=0.50

v=0.00

v=0.15v=0.30

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

t

R-F

unctionR(0.75,v,-1,0,t)

v= -0.45

v= 0.60

v= -0.45 to v= 0.60 in steps of 0.15

a= -1.0, q=0.75

v=0.00v=0.15v=0.30

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

t

R-F

unctionR(1.00,v,-1,0,t)

v= -0.45

v= 0.60

v= -0.45 to v= 0.90 in steps of 0.15

a= -1.0, q=1.00

v=0.00v=0.15v=0.30

v=0.75

v=0.90

NASA/TP—1999-209424

6

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

t

R-FunctionR(1.0,0,a,0,t)

a= 0.00

a= 0.50

a= -2.0 to 0.5 in steps of 0.5

a= -2.00

q=1.0, v= 0.0

a= -0.50

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

t

R-FunctionR(0.50,0,a,0,t)

a= 0.00

a= 0.50a= -2.0 to 0.5 in steps of 0.5

a= -2.00

q=0.50, v= 0.0

a= -0.50

Figure 3d. Effect of a ( )taR ,0,on 0,00.1

0.0,00.1 == vq

Figure 3a. Effect of a ( )taR ,0,on 0,25.0

0.0,00.1 == vqFigure 3b. Effect of a ( )taR ,0,on 0,50.0

0.0,50.0 == vq

Figure 3c. Effect of a ( )taR ,0,on 0,75.0

0.0,75.0 == vq

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

t

R-F

unctionR(0.75,0,a,0,t)

a= 0.00

a= 0.50

a= -2.0 to 0.5 in steps of 0.5

a= -2.00

q=0.75, v= 0.0

a= -0.50

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

t

R-F

unctionR(0.25,0,a,0,t)

a= 0.00

a= 0.50

a= -2.0 to 0.5 in steps of 0.5

a= -2.00

q=0.25, v= 0.0

a= -0.50

NASA/TP—1999-209424

NASA/TP—1999-209424 7

Eigen-propertyThe R -function also has the eigenfunction character under qth order differintegration with

.0=v This is seen as follows. Consider

( ) ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )22.1

,,0

11

0, ∑∞

=

−+

+Γ−

=n

qnqtc

n

qqtc qn

ctdatcaRd

Now, Oldham and Spanier (1974 p.67) prove the following useful form

[ ] ( )[ ]( ) ( )23.1

1

1 −>+−Γ−+Γ=−

pvp

axpaxd

vppv

xa

Applying this equation we have

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )24.0,,

0

1

0, >Γ

−= ∑∞

=

qnq

ctatcaRd

n

nqn

qqtc

Now let n m= +1, then,

( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )25011

111

>+Γ

−= ∑∞

−=

−++

qqm

cta

m

qmm

or

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )26.01

lim,,,,11

-1m0,0, >

+Γ−+=

−+

→q

qm

ctaatcaRatcaRd

qmm

qqqtc

The right most term in equation (26) is zero for ct ≠ , thus, for ct > the final result is

( ) ( ) ( )27.0,,,,, 0,0, >>= qcttcaRatcaRd qqqtc

Thus, for 1=a the function is seen to return itself under qth order differentiation.

Differintegration of the R-FunctionIt is of interest to determine the differintegral of the R -function, that is

[ ] ( ) ( )( )

( )( )( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )28.11

,,0 0

1111

, ∑ ∑∞

=

=

−−+−−+

−+Γ−=

−+Γ−=

n n

vqnutc

nvqnnutcvq

utc vqn

ctda

vqn

ctadtcaRd

Oldham and Spanier (1974 p.67) prove the following useful form (equation (23) repeated)

[ ] ( )[ ]( ) ( )29,1

1

1 −>+−Γ−+Γ=−

pvp

axpaxd

vppv

xa

which is applied to equation (28) to yield

[ ] ( ) ( )( ) ( )

( ) ( )( ) ( )30.01

,,0

11

, >−+−+Γ

−= ∑∞

=

+−−+

vquvqn

ctatcaRd

n

uvqnn

vqutc

Thus we have the useful result

[ ] ( )[ ] ( )31.,,,, ,, vqtcaRtcaRd uvqvqutc >= +

That is, u order differintegration of the R -function returns another R -function.

8

Relationship Between mqq,R and 0,qR

From the definition of R we can write

( ) ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )32.11

,,0

11

0

11

, ∑∑∞

=

−+−

=

−−+

+−Γ−−=

−+Γ−=

n

qnnmq

n

mqqnn

mqq qmn

ctact

mqqn

ctatcaR

Letting n m r− = , yields

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )33,1

,,11

, ∑∞

−=

−+++−

+Γ−−=

mr

qmrmrmq

mqq qr

ctacttcaR

or

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )34.11

,,1 11

0

11

, ∑∑−

−=

−+∞

=

−+

+Γ−+

+Γ−=

mr

qrrm

r

qrrm

mqq qr

ctaa

qr

ctaatcaR

Recognizing the first summation on the right hand side as ( ),,,0, tcaRq gives the final result as;

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )

( )( ) ( )35.1

,,,,1 11

0,, ∑−

−=

−+

+Γ−+=

mr

qrrm

qm

mqq qr

ctaatcaRatcaR

It is noted, that when ( )r q+ ≤1 0 and integer the elements of the summation term vanish.

Fractional Impulse FunctionConsider the function ( ),,0,00, tRq then we can write,

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( )( ) ( )36.1

lim,0,lim,0,00

11

00,

00, ∑

=

−+

→→ +Γ==

n

qnn

aq

aq qn

tataRtR

In the limit the terms n > 0, of the summation vanish, thus

( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )37.lim,0,

110

00,

q

t

q

tataR

qq

aq Γ

=−−

From equation (19) the associated Laplace transform pair is given by;

( ){ } ( ) ( ) ( )38.0Re,0Re1

,0,00, >>= sqs

tRLqq

Relationship of the R-function to the Elementary Functions Many of the elementary functions are special cases of the R -function. Some of these areillustrated here.

Exponential Function Consider ( )taR ,0,0,1 , by definition, we have

( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )39,!1

,0,0 0

0,1 ∑ ∑∞

=

=

=+Γ

=n n

nnn

n

at

n

tataR

thus

( ) ( )40.,0,0,1taetaR =

NASA/TP—1999-209424

9

Sine Function

Consider ( )taRa ,0,20,2 − , by definition, we have

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( )41,....!5!3!12

,0,5432

0

12122

0,2

−+−=+

−=− ∑∞

=

−+ tatata

n

taataRa

n

nn

thus

( ) ( ) ( )42.sin,0,20,2 attaRa =−

Cosine Function

The cosine function relates to ( ),,0,21,2 taR − again by definition

( ) ( ) ( )

( )( )( )( ) ( )43,....

!4!21

!2121,0,

4422

0

22

0

112122

1,2

−+−=−=−+Γ

−=− ∑∑∞

=

=

−−+ tata

n

ta

n

tataR

n

nn

n

nn

thus

( ) ( ) ( )44.cos,0,21,2 tataR =−

Hyperbolic Sine and Cosine

Consider ( )taRa ,0,20,2 , by definition, we have

( ) ( ) ( )

( )( )( )( ) ( )45,...

!5!3!1221,0,

5533

0

122

0

12122

0,2

+++=+

=+Γ

= ∑∑∞

=

+∞

=

−+ tatata

n

taa

n

taataRa

n

nn

n

nn

thus,

( ) ( ) ( )46.sinh,0,20,2 tataRa =

In similar manner

( ) ( ) ( )47.cosh,0,21,2 tataR =

R-Function Identities

Trigonometric Based IdentitiesA number of identities involving the R -function may be readily shown based on the

elementary functions. The exponential function, equation (40)

( ) ( )48,,0,0,1xaexaR =

may be expressed as

( ) ( )49.,0,0,1 xiRe xi = Then from equation (42)

( ) ( ) ( )50,,0,sin 20,2 xaRaax −=

and expressing the sine function in complex exponential terms gives

( ) ( ) ( )51.2

1sin xixi ee

ix −−=

NASA/TP—1999-209424

10

Combining equations (49) ,(50) and (51) then yields the identity

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )52.,0,-02

1,0,1 1,00,10,2 xiR,xi,R

ixR −=−

In similar manner using the cosine function, equation (44)

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )53,2

1,0,1cos 1,2

xixi eexRx −+=−=

from which

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )54.,0,+02

1,0,1 1,00,11,2 xiR,xi,RxR −=−

The hyperbolic functions may also be used as a basis, using sinh function, yields

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )55.,0,1-012

1,0,1 1,00,10,2 xR,x,RxR −=

The cosh function gives

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )56.,0,1+012

1,0,1 1,00,11,2 xR,x,RxR −=

Many other identities may be found based on the known trigonometric identities, a few examplesfollow, from

( ) ( ) ( )57,1cossin 22 =+ xx

we have

( ) ( ) ( )58.1,0,1,0,1 22,1

22,0 =−+− xRxR

From the identity

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )59,cossin22sin xxx =

derives( ) ( ) ( ) ( )60.,0,1,0,122,0,1 1,20,20,2 xRxRxR −−=−

From the trigonometric identity

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )61,sin4sin33sin 3 xxx −=

we determine the identity

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )62.,0,14,0,133,0,1 32,00,20,2 xRxRxR −−−=−

Further IdentitiesOther identities may be derived as follows. Let v q p= − , then the Laplace transform of the

R -function may be written as

( ){ } ( ) ( )63.1s

=,0,, assastaRL

qqpq

pq

pqq +=

+− −

NASA/TP—1999-209424

11

This may be rearranged to give

( ) ( )64.111

+−+=

+− as

a

sass qpqqp

Inverse transforming gives the identity

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )65.,0,,0,0=,0, 0,, taaRtRtaR ppqq −−−−

Another set of identities follows by factoring the denominator of Laplace transform, thus

( ) ( )( ) ( )66.1

,0,2/12/2/12/

+−

=−

⇔asas

sas

staR

qq

v

q

v

q,v

Now a partial fraction expansion of the denominator gives

( )67.2

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

2/12/

2/1

2/12/

2/1

2/12/

2/1

2/12/

2/1

+−

−=

+−

−=

as

sa

as

sa

asa

asas

q

v

q

v

qqv

Taking the inverse transform, yields

( ) ( ) ( ){ } ( )68.,0,,0,2

1,0, 2/1

,2/2/1

,2/2/1 taRtaRa

taR vqvqq,v −−=

Very many more such identities are possible, indeed because of the generality of the R -function,powerful meta-identities may be possible.

Relationship of the R-Function to Other FunctionsThe generality of the R -function allows it to be related to many other functions. In this

section it will be related to the important functions discussed in the introductory section of thepaper. The Laplace transform facilitates determination of the desired relationships. The doublearrow will be used to indicate the transform pairs, thus for the R -function;

( ) ( ) ( )690Re,,, >−−

⇔ vqas

stcaR

q

v

vq

Mittag-Leffler’s Function The Mittag-Leffler function and its transform relate to the L-function as;

[ ] ( ) ( )70.,0,1,

1

taRas

satE qqq

qq

q −⇔+

⇔− −

The time domain relationship is

( ) [ ] ( )( ) ( )71.

1,0,

01, ∑

=− +Γ

−=−=−n

nqnq

qqq qn

tataEtaR

Also, because [ ] ( )[ ],,,,, ,, tcaRtcaRd vqvqtc −=− +αα it follows that

( ) ( )[ ] ( )72.,,0,1 q

qqqtc ctaEtcaRd −−=−−

NASA/TP—1999-209424

pq −,

12

Argarwal’s FunctionThe Argarwal function and its transform relate to the R -function as follows;

[ ] ( ) ( )73.,0,11 ,, tR

s

stE pqqq

pqq

pq −

⇔−

The time domain relationship is

( ) [ ] ( ) ( )74.,0,10

1

,, ∑∞

=

+−

− +Γ==

n

pnqq

pqpqq pnq

ttEtR

Erdelyi’s FunctionThe relationship between the Erdelyi function and the R -function is given by

( ) [ ] ( ) ( )75.,0,10

1,

1, ∑

=

−−− +Γ

==n

nqq

qqq qn

tttEttR

ββ

ββ

β

Robotnov and Hartley FunctionThe F-function and its transform relate to the R -function as follows;

[ ] ( ) ( )76.,0,1

, 0, taRas

taF qqq −⇔+

⇔−

The time series common to these functions is given as;

( ) [ ] ( ) ( )

( )( ) ( )77.1

,,0,0

11

0, ∑∞

=

−+

+Γ−=−=−

n

qnn

qq qn

tataFtaR

Miller and Ross’s FunctionThe Miller and Ross function and its transform relate to the R -function as follows

( ) ( ) ( )78.,0,, ,1 taRas

savE v

v

t −

⇔−

The time series common to these functions is given as;

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )79.

1,,0,

01 ∑

=

+

− ++Γ==

n

vnn

tv, vn

taavEtaR

Example - The Dynamic ThermocoupleThis problem was introduced originally in Lorenzo and Hartley 1998, and frequency domain

solutions are presented there. Here, it is desired to determine the time domain dynamic responseof the thermocouple, figure 4, which is designedto achieve rapid response. The thermocoupleconsists of two dissimilar metals with a commonjunction point. To achieve a high level ofdynamic response, the mass of the junction andthe diameter of the wire are minimized. Becausethe wires are long and insulated they will betreated as semi-infinite (heat) conductors. Thisanalysis will determine the time response of thejunction temperature ( )T sb in response to the

k1 1,α

k2 2,α

Tg

( )Q ti

( )Q t2

( )Q t1

Tb

Figure 4. Dynamic Thermocouple

NASA/TP—1999-209424

13

free stream gas temperature ( )T sg . For the semi-infinite conductors the conducted heat rate

( )Q t is given by

( ) ( )80,2/1btc

j

jj TD

ktQ

α=

where k is the thermal conductivity and α is the thermal diffusivity. For the transfer functionthe effects of initialization are not required, therefore, all ( )ψ t 's are zero. Thus the followingequations describe the time domain behavior:

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )81,tTtThAtQ bgi −=

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )82,1

211

0 tQtQtQDwc

tT itv

b −−= −

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )83and,,0,,, 21

12/1

0

1

12/10

1

11 taTtTd

ktTD

ktQ bbtbt ψ

αα+==

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )84,0,,, 21

22/1

0

2

22/10

2

22 taTtTd

ktTD

ktQ bbtbt ψ

αα+==

where h A is the product of the convection heat transfer coefficient and the surface area and

wcv is the product of the junction mass and the specific heat of the material. Taking the Laplacetransform of these equations yields

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )85sTsThAsQ bgi −=

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )8611

321

+−−= ssQsQsQ

swcsT i

vb ψ

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )8712/1

1

11 ssTs

ksQ b ψ

α+=

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )8822/1

2

22 ssTs

ksQ b ψ

α+=

Eliminating the Q’s, and solving for ( )T sb yields

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )89,32

2

21

1

12/1

1

+−−

++

= sssk

sk

shATcbss

sT gwc

bv ψψ

αψ

α

where ,1

2

2

1

1

+=ααkk

wcb

v

and .vwc

hAc = Factoring the leading denominator and

NASA/TP—1999-209424

14

expanding in partial fractions gives

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )90,1

32

2

21

1

1

22/1

1

12/1

12112

+−−

+

++

= −− sssk

sk

shATsswc

sT gv

b ψψα

ψαββ

ββββ

where β12

2

1

24= + −

bb c and β2

2

2

1

24= − −

bb c . Then with appropriate choices for the

functions of s in the right most bracket this equation may be inverse transformed to yield the timedomain response. To demonstrate the value of the R -function, we select (determine)

( ) ( ) ,/03 sTs b=ψ Further assume ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )T t T t T s

T

s sg b gb= + ⇒ = +2 0

2 0 12 , and

( ) ( )ψ ψ1 2s s= are arbitrary functions of time. The solution may be written directly as:

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[( ) ( ) ( ) ]

( ) ( ) ( ){ } ( )

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ){ } ( )91.,0,,0,01

,0,,0,1

,0,,0,02

,0,,0,02

20,2/110,2/112

1

0

20,2/111/2,0

2

2

1

1

12

21/2,-221/2,-1

12,2/111/2,-112

tRtRTwc

dtRtRkk

wc

tRtRT

tRtRTwc

hAtT

bv

t

v

b

bv

b

ββββ

ττψτβτβααββ

ββ

ββββ

−−−−

+−−−−−

+

−−−−−

−+−−

=

Further Generalized FunctionsFunctions yet more general than the R -function may be developed. One such function will

be derived here. It is simpler here to work backward from the s-domain to the time domain. Thus,we consider the following function

( ) ( ) ( )92rq as

ssG

−=

ν

where ν , ,q and r are not constrained to be integers. Then this may be written as

( ) ( )93.1r

qqrv

s

assG

−−

−=

Now the parenthetical expression may be expanded using the binomial theorem to give

( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )94,1,

11

1

0

<

−−Γ+Γ−Γ= ∑

=

−q

j

j

qrq

s

a

s

a

rjj

rssG ν

or

( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )95.

11

1

0∑∞

=

−−−−−Γ+Γ

−Γ=j

jqrqj sarjj

rsG ν

NASA/TP—1999-209424

15

This expression may be term by term inverse transformed yielding

[ ] ( )( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )96.1,0Re,0Re,11

1,

0

1

,, <>>−−+Γ−−Γ+Γ

−−Γ=∑∞

=

−−+

qj

qjrj

rq s

asvqr

qjrrjj

tartaG

ν

ν

ν

Thus we have the following transform pair

[ ]{ } ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )97.0,0Re,0Re,,,, >>>−−

=qrqrq s

asvqr

as

staGL

ν

ν

The form of equation (96) presents evaluation difficulties, since when r is an integer

( )Γ 1− r and ( )Γ 1− −j r can become infinite. Equation (96) maybe rewritten as follows: from

Spanier and Oldham (p.414, eq.43:5:5)

( ) ( )( )( ) ( )

( ) ( )( ) ( )98,2,1,01

1

21�

=−Γ−=

−−−Γ=−Γ n

x

x

nxxx

xnx

n

n

where ( )1− x n is the Pochhammer polynomial. From this result with x r= −1 , we can write

( ) ( )( )( ) ( )

( ) ( )( ) ( )99,2,1

11

11

11 �

=−Γ−=−−−−−

−Γ=−−Γ jr

r

jrrr

rrj

j

j

Substituting this result in equation (96), yields the following more computable results

[ ] ( )( ) ( ){ }( ) ( )

( ) ( )( ) ( )100.1

11,

0

1

,, ∑∞

=

−−+

−+Γ+Γ−−−−−−=

j

qjrj

rq qjrj

tarjrrtaG

ν

ν

ν�

or in terms of the Pochhammer polynomial

[ ] ( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )101.1,0Re,0Re,1

,0

1

,, ∑∞

=

−−+

<>>−−+Γ+Γ

=j

q

qjrjj

rq s

asvqr

qjrj

tartaG

ν

ν

ν

In similar manner relationships of increasing generality may be determined. Podlubny (1999)presents a form that is a special case of the G -function where r is constrained to be an integer. Itis also clear that taking r =1specializes the G -function into the R -function. It is the authors’judgment that the F- and R -functions will prove to be the most useful in practical applications.Table 1 summarizes the advanced functions studied in this paper along with their defining seriesand Laplace Transforms.

NASA/TP—1999-209424

16

SummaryThis paper has presented a new function for use in the fractional calculus, it is called the

R -function. The R -function is unique in that it contains all of the derivatives and integrals ofthe F-function. The R -function has the eigen-property, that is it returns itself on qth order differ-integration. Special cases of the R -function also include the exponential function, the sine,cosine, hyperbolic sine and hyperbolic cosine functions. Further, the R -function contains, asspecial cases; the Mittag-Leffler function, Agarwal's function, Erdelyi's function, Hartley'sF-function, and Miller and Ross's function. Numerous identities are possible with theR -function some of these have been shown in the text.

The value of the R -function is clearly demonstrated in the dynamic thermocouple problemwhere it enables the analyst to directly inverse transform the Laplace domain solution,(operational (s) form) to obtain the time domain solution.

A further generalization of the R -function, called the G -function brings in the effects ofrepeated and partially repeated fractional poles. This generalization carries increased timedomain complexity.

A R -function based trigonometry is also possible. It is a generalization of the conventionaltrigonometry, and will be the subject of a future paper.

Table 1 Summary of Defining Series and Laplace

Function Time Expression Laplace Transform Remarks

Mittag-Leffler [ ] ( )E ata t

nqq

qn nq

n

=+=

∑Γ 10 ( )s

s s a

q

q −( )q−1 differintegral of

Agarwal ( )( )( )

( )E tt

mq

m q

mα β

β α

α β,

/

=+

+ −

=

∑1

0Γs

s

α β

α

−1

Erdelyi ( ) ( )E tt

m

m

mα β α β, =

+=

∑Γ0

( )( )∑

=++Γ

+Γ0

1

1

mmsm

mβα

0, >βα

Robotnov / Hartley [ ]( )

( )( )F a ta t

n qq

n n q

n

, =+

+ −

=

∑1 1

0 1Γ1

s aq − eigenfunction

Miller-Ross ( ) ( )E v aa t

v kt

k k v

k

, =+ +

+

=

∑Γ 10

s

s a

v−

Current Paper ( )( )

( )( )∑∞

=

−−+

−+Γ=

0

11

,1

,n

vqnn

vqvqn

tataR

s

s a

v

q − eigenfunction & differintegral

Current Paper ( )( ) ( ) ( )( )

( ) ( ) ( )( )G a tr a t

j r j q vq v r

jj r j q v

jj

, , , =−

− + + −

+ − −

=

∑1

0 1 1Γ Γ ( )s

s a

v

q r−eigenfunction & differintegrals

repeated & partially rep.l

NASA/TP—1999-209424

17

ReferencesErdelyi, A., Editor, Magnus, W., Oberhetinger F., and Tricomi F.G., Tables of IntegralTransforms, vol. 1, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1954, LCC Number 54–6214.

Hartley, T.T. and Lorenzo, C.F., A Solution to the Fundamental Linear Fractional OrderDifferential Equation, NASA /TP—1998-208963, December 1998.

Hartley, T.T. and Lorenzo, C.F., The Vector Linear Fractional Initialization Problem,NASA /TP—1999-208919, May 1999.

Miller, K.S. and Ross, B., An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional DifferentialEquations, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993.

Mittag-Leffler, M.G., Une generalisation de l’integrale de Laplace-Abel, Proc. Paris Academy ofScience, pp. 537–539, March 2, 1903(a).

Mittag-Leffler, M.G., Sur la nouvelle fontion ( )xEa , Proc. Paris Academy of Science,

pp. 554–558, October 21, 1903(b).

Mittag-Leffler, M.G., Sur la representation analytique d’une branche uniforme d’une fonctionmonogene, Acta Mathematica, vol. 29, pp. 101–181, 1905.

Podlubny, I., Fractional Order Systems and PI Dλ µ Controllers, IEEE Transactions on AutomaticControl, vol. 44, no. 1, January 1999.

Spanier, J. and Oldham, K.B., An Atlas of Functions, Hemisphere Publishing Corp. (Subsidiaryof Harper & Row, Publishers Inc.) 1987.

Wylie, C.R., Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1975.

Robotnov, Y.N., Tables of a Fractional Exponential Function of Negative Parameters and ItsIntegral (in Russian), Nauka, Russia (1969).

Robotnov, Y.N., Elements of Hereditary Solid Mechanics (in English) MIR Publishers,Moscow, 1980.

NASA/TP—1999-209424

This publication is available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information, (301) 621–0390.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

2. REPORT DATE

19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT

18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of thiscollection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 JeffersonDavis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.

NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18298-102

Form Approved

OMB No. 0704-0188

12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER

5. FUNDING NUMBERS

3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

6. AUTHOR(S)

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)

14. SUBJECT TERMS

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT

16. PRICE CODE

15. NUMBER OF PAGES

20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT

Unclassified Unclassified

Technical Paper

Unclassified

National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationJohn H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis FieldCleveland, Ohio 44135–3191

1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank)

10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationWashington, DC 20546–0001

October 1999

NASA TP—1999-209424/REV1

E–11944

WU–523–22–13–00

Unclassified -UnlimitedSubject Categories: 59, 66, and 67

23

A03

Generalized Functions for the Fractional Calculus

Carl F. Lorenzo and Tom T. Hartley

Fractional calculus; Fractional differential equations; Systems; Generalized functions;Eigenfunctions

Distribution: Standard

Carl F. Lorenzo, NASA Glenn Research Center, and Tom T. Hartley, The University of Akron, Department of ElectricalEngineering, Akron, Ohio 44325–3904. Responsible person, Carl F. Lorenzo, organization code 5500, (216) 433–3733.

Previous papers have used two important functions for the solution of fractional order differential equations, the Mittag-Leffler function Eq[atq] (1903a, 1903b, 1905), and the F-function Fq[a,t] of Hartley & Lorenzo (1998). These functionsprovided direct solution and important understanding for the fundamental linear fractional order differential equation andfor the related initial value problem (Hartley and Lorenzo, 1999). This paper examines related functions and their Laplacetransforms. Presented for consideration are two generalized functions, the R-function and the G-function, useful inanalysis and as a basis for computation in the fractional calculus. The R-function is unique in that it contains all of thederivatives and integrals of the F-function. The R-function also returns itself on qth order differ-integration. An exampleapplication of the R-function is provided. A further generalization of the R-function, called the G-function brings in theeffects of repeated and partially repeated fractional poles.