GCS SAT Report 2007-08 file9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 1 GCS...

28
9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 1 GCS SAT Report 2007-08 Presentation for Board of Education Gongshu Zhang, Ed. D. Chief Accountability and Research Officer , GCSNC September 11, 2008

Transcript of GCS SAT Report 2007-08 file9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 1 GCS...

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 1

GCS SAT Report

2007-08

Presentation for Board of Education

Gongshu Zhang, Ed. D.

Chief Accountability and Research Officer , GCSNC

September 11, 2008

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 2

Understanding of SAT

Appropriate Interpretation of Its Score

• SAT assesses broadly applicable intellectual skills and knowledge that develop slowly over time through the individual’s experiences both in and out of school.

• Relationships between test scores and other factors such as educational background, gender, ethnicity, parental education, and household income are complex and interdependent. These factors do not directly affect test performance, rather, they are associated with educational experiences.

• Not all students in a high school or school district take the SAT test. Since the population of test-takers is self-selected, using aggregate SAT scores to compare or evaluate schools, districts, states, or other educational units must be very cautious.

• Interpreting SAT scores for subgroups requires unique considerations. The most significant factor to consider in interpreting SAT scores for any group, or subgroup, of test-takers is the proportion of students taking the test.

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 3

Part I

GCS Performance in SAT

Number of Students Who Took SAT: 1999 to 2008

2484

2984

22532309 2376

2689 2714 28452923

3089

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

2400

2800

3200

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

9/11/2008 4GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt

5

Percentage of Students among SAT Takers

22.6 22.7 23.5 23.7 24.3 24.028.1 29.9 30.9 31.8

55.255.8 53.4 53.2

7.16.8 7.2

8.0

7.4 8.3

9.610.0 11.8

13.2

8.3 9.9 10.413.6

18.7 17.1

7.14.4 3.9 1.8

58.962.0

54.7

60.7

49.750.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

African American White Other Not Respond

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt

6

Mean Verbal/Critical Reading Score – 1999 to 2008

400

430

460

490

520

550

GCS_W 522 523 527 527 532 537 535 528 530 535

GCS_All 494 495 495 492 494 504 492 490 487 488

GCS_AA 431 433 420 420 416 426 416 421 415 418

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt

7

Mean Math Score – 1999 to 2008

400

430

460

490

520

550

GCS_W 526 532 538 538 539 543 542 542 540 549

GCS_All 498 504 503 503 503 508 502 504 498 503

GCS_AA 424 428 421 424 421 423 422 434 423 428

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt

Number of Students Took SAT: 1999 to 2008

1359

1589

13961401 1400

13351373

1633 1632 1650

0

425

850

1275

1700

589

950

510523 558

654 651

832874

956

0

425

850

1275

1700

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

AA

W

9/11/2008 8GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt

9

Mean Total (RM) Score – 1999 to 2008

800

830

860

890

920

950

980

1010

1040

1070

1100

GCS_W 1048 1055 1065 1065 1071 1079 1076 1070 1070 1084

GCS_All 992 999 997 994 997 1011 994 994 985 990

GCS_AA 855 861 842 843 836 848 838 855 838 846

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt

10

Mean Writing Score – 2006 to 2008

400

430

460

490

520

550

GCS_W 522 522 527

GCS_All 482 479 480

GCS_AA 414 408 411

2006 2007 2008

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 11

Mean Total (RM) Score Gain: 2007 and 2008

0

-9

6

8

-18

14

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

2006-2007 2007-2008

All AA White

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 12

Mean Total (RMW) Score Gain: 2007 and 2008

0

-13

7

12

-25

18

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

2006-2007 2007-2008

All AA White

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 13

code school name 2007 2007 2007

score goal score met score goal score met score goal score met

319 Andrews H 422 429 433 Y 420 424 436 Y 411 414 422 Y

326 The M C Bennett 405 411 375 N 366 370 399 Y 408 410 365 N

355 Dudley H 424 430 417 N 437 442 438 N 420 422 418 N

358 Eastern H 439 446 460 Y 462 467 473 Y 429 432 442 Y

390 Greensboro M C 509 516 461 N 506 511 460 N 489 492 458 N

394 Grimsley H 548 556 544 N 547 553 557 Y 535 539 539 Y

395 The Early C at Guilford 656 666 640 N 629 635 639 Y 642 645 628 N

399 M C at GTCC Greensboro 433 440 512 Y 413 417 492 Y 415 417 460 Y

401 M C at GTCC Jamestown 465 472 473 Y 476 481 473 N 457 460 441 N

406 H Point Central H 457 463 481 Y 477 481 497 Y 454 457 478 Y

407 HPCH ACD 440 447 422 N 480 485 412 N 420 423 392 N

408 M C at GTCC H Point 446 453 457 Y 465 470 459 N 446 449 414 N

483 M C at NCA&T 375 381 346 N 381 385 335 N 336 338 323 N

484 Northeast H 441 448 449 Y 450 454 459 Y 434 436 431 N

490 Northwest H 543 551 532 N 558 564 558 N 535 538 529 N

508 Page H 483 490 497 Y 491 496 507 Y 477 480 494 Y

529 Ragsdale H 489 497 487 N 513 518 508 N 484 487 487 Y

544 Smith H 392 398 408 Y 412 416 437 Y 390 393 398 Y

545 Smith ACD 427 434 396 N 411 416 416 Y 419 421 387 N

547 Southeast H 483 491 474 N 499 504 490 N 469 472 460 N

556 Southern H 456 463 441 N 468 473 448 N 444 447 429 N

562 Southwest H 483 490 476 N 494 499 494 N 476 479 462 N

589 Weaver Education Center 582 591 563 N 535 540 545 Y 543 546 530 N

595 Western H 499 506 515 Y 520 525 530 Y 497 500 513 Y

2008 SAT Result

2008

WritingCritical Reading

2008

Math

2008

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 14

Seven High Schools Met all Three SAT Goals 2008

Andrews High

Eastern High

M C at GTCC Greensboro

High Point Central High

Page High

Smith High

Western High

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 15

Six High Schools

Exceeded NC Mean Total (MRW) Score of 1489

The Early College at Guilford

Grimsley High

Weaver Education Center

Northwest High

Western High

Page High

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 16

Five High Schools

Exceeded US Mean Total (MRW) Score of 1511

The Early College at Guilford

Grimsley High

Weaver Education Center

Northwest High

Western High

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 17

N 99 98 N Critical

code School Name total percentile percentile total Math Reading Writing

8 2 6 30 9 16 5

394 Grimsley High 3 1 2 10 2 5 3

490 Northwest High 1 1 4 3 1

595 Western High 1 1 4 2 2

395 The E C at Guilford 1 1 3 1 2

508 Page High 1 1 3 1 2

406 H P Central High 1 1 1 1

319 Andrews High 1 1

529 Ragsdale High 1 1

547 Southeast High 1 1

562 Southwest High 1 1

589 Weaver EC 1 1

Top 2% in US: Total (MRW) Score Perfect Score: 800

GCS Total

Schools with Top SAT Performers of the United States 2008Number of Students

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 18

Part II

GCS, NC, and the United States

19

Percentage of SAT Tested: 2001 to 2008

0

20

40

60

80

100

GCS 73.8 71.6 71.7 68.1 70.0 70.3 70.7 65.0

NC State 65.0 67.0 68.0 70.0 74.0 71.0 71.0 63.0

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt

20

Mean Total (RM) Score of Public School Students – 2001 to 2008

800

830

860

890

920

950

980

1010

1040

1070

1100

GCS 997 994 997 1011 994 994 985 990

NC State 989 994 999 1003 1008 1006 999 1003

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 21

Mean Total (RM) Score: 2008Percent Test-Taker -- GCS vs. NC = 63.0 : 63.0

1003 1003

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

GCS NC

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 22

Mean Total (RM) Score

1096

852

1062 1062

846

1084

855 852

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

AA White AA White

GCS NC

GCS : NC = 65% : 63% GCS : NC = 63% : 63%

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 23

Mean Total (RM) Score by School GPA Grade

928

996

1137

769

827

907

983

1113

752

823

942 945

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

C B A C B A

GCS NC

African American White

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 24

Percentage SAT Tested: 2007 and 2008

45.0

70.765.0

48.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008

Guilford Nation

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 25

Mean Total (RM) Score: 2007 and 2008High School Rank: Top Tenth -- GCS vs. NC vs. Nation

1170 11621185

1174 11711182

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

2007 2008

GCS NC Nation

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 26

Mean Total (RM) Score: 2007 and 2008Percent Test-Taker -- GCS vs. Nation = 70.7: 48.0 (2007) & 65.0: 45.0 (2008)

1084

846

985 991

1070

838

1065

856

1061

862

1017 1017

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

All AA White All AA White

GCS Nation

2007 2008

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 27

Mean Total (RM) Score: 2007 and 2008Percent Test-Taker -- GCS vs. Nation = 48.0 : 48.0 (2007) and 45.0 : 45.0 (2008)

924

1175

856

106510781096

1168

922

1061

862

1017 1017

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

All AA White All AA White

GCS Nation

2007 2008

9/11/2008 GZHANG GCSNC C:\presentation\2008\BOE_SAT_09112008.ppt 28

Summary

• In 2008 the total SAT (MRW) score increased 7 points from 2007, with math 5 points, critical reading and writing 1 point each.

• Among ethnic groups White made greatest progress with total score gain by 18 points, and AA made second largest progress with total score gain by 12 points.

• GCS White students have significantly outperformed NC and US White students, by all means, as measured by total (MR) score for the recent years. Our AA students performed better than NC AA students when taking participation rate into account.

• Seven high schools met tough 2008 SAT goals in all 3 subjects. Six schools outperformed NC total (MRW) mean, and 5 schools outperformed US total (MRW) mean.

• Eight students were at the top 2% nationwide. Thirty student-tests received perfect score (800).

• We should challenge our high performing students further. Most importantly we must accelerate our students with color strongly in SAT progress, especially close the gaps between White and AA students with solid measures.